research articles and book chapters about contemporary education analysis in urban contexts in journal such as Curriculum Inquiry, the Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, Educational Studies, The Urban Review, the Review of Educa- tion, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, and co-edited the volumes Unsettling Beliefs: Teaching Theory to Teachers (2008) and Ethics and International Curriculum Work: The Challenges of Culture and Context (2012). In 2008, Dr. Helfenbein served as the Section Chair for Critical Perspectives and Practices of AERA Division B-Curriculum Studies followed by serving as overall Program Chair for Division B in 2009 and was nominated into the Professors of Curriculum at AERA 2011. He is currently Editor of
. Duringmost of that first semester, the course materials were being delivered “just in time” for studentuse.EST104 Topical Syllabus A. Engineering as a Career B. Ethics C. Engineering Design and Teamwork D. Engineering Communication E. EXCEL - Workbooks & Graphs F. MATLAB programming – script files, functions, input/output, plotting, logic and conditionals, logic and relational operators, conditional statements, for loops, while loops.EST104 Schedule of topics for fall 2011 Week 1-5 EXCEL with applications to Ohm‟s Law and the Speed of Sound in air. Week 6 Flowcharting and Procedural Programming Week 7-10 MATLAB – Programming a Stepper Motor in MATLAB
, cultural, ethical, and environmental awareness. Personal skills, such as persistence, imagination, curiosity, risk taking, reading and comprehension, the cultivation of a positive can-do attitude, clarity of thought, goal oriented thinking, as well as life-long, lateral learning and artistic abilities. Social skills, such as teamwork, communication and humor. Students engage in business-like experience apart from the traditional classroomenvironment. They work as a team, take risks, push past failures, interact with prospectivecustomers and are exposed to business, as well as technical issues. As in a typical businessenvironment, the students attend regular meetings and
as a tool to examine complex environmental issues with a spatial context.Kelley notes, regarding the study: “While it can be used as-is with little preparation for anintroductory environmental studies course, other disciplines might want to preface the exercisewith a discussion of partitioning coefficients, remediation technologies, or environmental law,depending on the discipline. For my use, I spend a class period ahead of time discussing the useof chemicals in our society, the economic and political placement of the sites/businesses that usethese chemicals in our midst (often along railroad lines or barge terminals for bulk transport),some ethical considerations regarding where these sites are located (near poorer, or ethnic
internationalSenior Capstone Design projects. It is anticipated that the remaining three outcomes canbe accomplished through program modifications and changes to the assessmentinstruments.It should be noted that 7 out of 8 of the FIPSE-SEAEP anticipated U.S. student outcomesdirectly align with the ABET Criterion 3 Student Outcomes (a-k).11 Outcomes d, f, h, iand j are notoriously difficult for engineering programs to implement, and assess, inalready overcrowded curriculums: d. an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams f. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility h. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context i. a
training was usually administered by a teaching and learning center. For the “workshopsthroughout year/monthly discussions,” the training was usually administered by someone in theFYEP. This could have been an experienced GTA or a faculty member. Often the topicsdiscussed in either of these trainings related to managing groups of students, facilitatingquestions, teaching ethics, and encouraging participation.Regarding the formal pedagogy training documented in Table 2, Roberto commented that: “You are supposed to go to these like seminars at the beginning. Uh, when you are in your first year, like the first week, but I don’t think they like track your attendance or anything like that…Not everyone goes. Like I went to a couple
students in both semestersreceiving instruction was much higher than their peers. Each spring, the Chemistry librarian speaks to a class in Ethics that all firstyear graduate students must take. The Computer Science department offers a year-long course for first-year PhD students, and theComputer Science librarian spoke to the class both semesters. Department Count Workstation Digital Reference Circulation Instruction Any Library (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Use (%) Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall
communication skills. Small stepsin creating text and placing that text in the forefront of engineering courses can be a simple way tomake of engineering students a force in the world around them.The structure of the courses within a department could expand to all required courses as in thefollowing. The communication elements in each course are shown below.Table 1. Engineering Courses and the Communication Elements in eachFresh. EGR 100 – Intro to Engineering DesignYear Resumes, email, short engineering focused reports, engineering writing demands, problem solving, speaking, ethics, and orientation to the university/college/majorsSoph. ME 201 – ThermodynamicsYear Student communication survey, refresher
all participants (new and returning) each session. Table 4 shows theracial ethical composition of all participants (new and returning) each session. Table 1 Participant Cohorts Cohort Cohort Cohort #3 Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort #1 #2 #4 #3 #4 #3 After- Summer Imagine Investigate Imagine Investig Investiga Innovate school Pilot I ate II te I Pilot Spring
whencompared to other similar students. Penner et al.23 demonstrate that students who designedphysical models better understood science models, though their instruments seemed biasedtowards these students. Further studies are needed to evaluate the learning of engineering.However, with respect to some engineering habits of mind, researchers have shown that designprovides an opportunity for students to test their preconceptions21, creatively develop uniquesolutions through multiple paths13,14,24,25, engage in systems thinking25, iteratively refine theirdesign and thinking20, learn from failure18,26, collaborate and communicate22,24,27, manipulate andreflect with materials15,18,21,26, and ethically and civically design for people28. Therefore, thoughthe
theirproject. After the first few days, their comfort with the adverse conditions for the projectimplementation increased. Their self-confidence and commitment to their work also increasedas evidenced by their long work hours and excellent team work ethic, both within their team butalso with their co-workers from Peru.Impact of the course topic. Quantitative post-survey data indicated that 67% of courseparticipants found the course topic more interesting than those from other sections of the course.Qualitative analysis of open-ended survey responses and travel team interviews indicated twothemes in the data, one related to positive motivations generated by the course topic and anotherrelated to negative motivations.Subthemes under positive motivation
professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity3(j) a knowledge of the impact of engineering technology solutions in a societal and global contextSustainability projects are excellent vehicles for reinforcing criteria 3(h) - 3(i). They provide anopportunity for self-directed study in an area where course work may not be common, reinforceethical considerations and provide context for work in a global sense.Student Groups:The subject program uses three criteria when staffing students into project teams. Student interestis weighed along with student GPA and with project skill set requirements. A staffing algorithmhas been implemented in software, with some human manipulation
sure thateverybody finds a thing, but rather about making it accessible and easy to use and remix andshare once it's found. Radical transparency is not a magic bullet -- it's not an "if you build it, theywill come" route to millions of readers. But it is a way to give the readers you get an opportunityand a choice to engage more deeply with a work on their own terms. What surprised me was how foreign (and consequently scary due to being an unknown)transparency was to so many people in academia. The mode of sharing that I'd taken for grantedin the open source context was much more constrained by data privacy concerns in the scholarlyrealm. There are good reasons for this; ethics are vital, and sometimes preserving privacy is theright
where students can receive academic for a project that is uniquely provided outside 9of the normal engineering curriculum. This allows the GDTs an opportunity to address thetechnical, professional, and social aspects of global competency. To control the quality of the Page 24.82.8work done by the GDTs, the faculty advisor that heads a project creates a curriculum based onproblem-solving and design. Therefore the students receive credit for their work and are boundby the usual work ethic that is expected of a student in a normal engineering course. Faculty advisors are recruited based on their
programming optimization • Power-point slides from lectures • Four lab experiments with lab manuals • Publication in "5 de Mayo" conference ME Capstone Course I Spring • Power Point presentations on ethics on the 2013 Capstone project Linear Algebra Spring • One assignment on least-squares’ method 2013 Friday Academy Fall • Assignment for plotting PV and analysis on the 2012 - need of smoothing/shifting/storage to satisfy the
technical lectures, the students are also given lectures andinstruction on Intellectual Property, Research Ethics, Conducting Literature Searches, SoftwareTools (Matlab, LabView, MapleSim, etc.) and the required use of Log Books. Students are alsomade aware of external competitions and potential publication avenues for their completedworks. Page 23.271.12Technical Meetings with Advisor: Once the proposal is accepted, the student(s) and advisoragree on periodic meeting intervals. Suggested intervals are to start biweekly and adjust asneeded. During each meeting the student(s) will give an update of progress, comment on theiradherence to the initial
over the term (Figure 9). Page 23.365.10 Figure 9: Perry Model of Intellectual and Ethical Development as presented in lecture to students during a debriefing on the activity. The number “1655” on the slide refers to the session number at the conference in which the paper was presented.4. Analysis and DiscussionThe pre-activity definitions, alongside visual word analyses generated from the entire student set,represent an initial baseline against which post-activity definitions can be compared. Anecdotalevidence from instructors on the challenges of leading the activity in the classroom, solicited inpost-studio meetings
student interested in an internshipfinds a suitable one.From the point of view of the startups, the main reasons for participating in the program are to: • Gain access to talented candidates with a passion for entrepreneurship; • Have flexibility in addressing their human resource needs and at a low cost, given the NEW- PATH subsidy; • Increase the organization’s visibility, brand awareness and allure on campus; • Cultivate stronger relationships with our university, its students and faculty.The internship program has been extremely successful. The startups that have hired NEWPATHstudents as interns have been enthusiastic in their praise of the students’ abilities, work ethic,and enthusiasm. Students have learned first-hand lessons
, Proposed Solution Resumes, email, short engineering focused Paper, Justified Evaluation Paper, Writing Profile reports, engineering writing demands, problem Paper solving, speaking, ethics, and orientation to the university/college/majorsSoph. ME 201 – ThermodynamicsYear Student communication survey, refresher for past grammatical expertiseJunior ME 332 – Fluid Mechanics ME 371 – Machine Design IYear Laboratory Reports: (Approx. 9 @ 4-6 pages each) Short Technical Reporting Brief narrative of procedure
, and is one of the best universities in Mexico.The Tecnológico de Monterrey has more than 126,000 registered students and almost 8,000faculty members on its 33 Campuses. The Tecnológico de Monterrey has been accredited by theSouthern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). The mission of Tecnológico deMonterrey is to: form persons with integrity, ethical standards and a humanistic outlook, who areinternationally competitive in their professional fields and will, at the same time, be goodcitizens committed to the economic, political, social, and cultural development of theircommunity and to the sustainable use of natural resources. Given these missions, Tecnológicode Monterrey and its community are committed to contributing to the
. Figure 15. A snapshot of the Control screen of the CCM4. Assessment of Student Learning OutcomesStudent learning outcomes were assessed throughout the project duration in each department aspart of its own senior design course. As in senior design courses at most institutions, the studentlearning outcomes in the senior design in the three departments typically were assessed on some ofthe key ‘a thru k’ ABET-defined student learning outcomes such as a) ability to apply knowledgeof mathematics, science, and engineering, b) ability to design and conduct experiments, c) abilityto design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs, d) ability to function onmultidisciplinary teams, f) understanding of professional and ethical responsibility
in the software tools.• To design / develop / implement and validate an interactive multimedia presentation (web and /or CD-ROM / DVD-ROM oriented) in a specific area of the case using the opportunities of our open source architecture, the 3DVR and panoramic objects, the time and motion accurate interactive digital videos, and optional active code offered.• To design/ develop some team integration, presentation, communication and knowledge documentation skills of complex engineering systems in a collaborative fashion over the Internet and company intranets.• To understand professional and ethical responsibility and to communicate such research areas and future trends in the field the case covers.• To encourage
is playing a moreactive role on private and public projects alike through a more open planning process,environmental regulations, and community standards. To be sure, this involvement from end-users and stakeholders provides valuable input, but it adds an element of complexity to the wayprojects are conceived, designed, and built. The difficulties of managing complexity cancontribute to misapplication and unsafe practice. As the complexity in our society and on ourprojects mounts, the risk to public health, safety and welfare increases.To effectively manage the complexity of the future, to make informed, ethical, and safe decisions Page
project management.11. Understanding of the elements of asset management.12. Understanding of the elements of construction.13. Understanding of business fundamentals as applied to private, government, and non-profit sectors.14. Understanding of public policy and administration fundamentals.15. Understanding of and abiding commitment to practice according to the professional and ethical standards of the engineering profession.16. An appreciation for culture, environment, history, and human behavior.17. Knowledge and appreciation of the relationship of engineering to critical contemporary Page 8.922.11 issues.18. Recognition of the
related to weight, performance, and reproducibility. Students also learn about the advances in and applications of remote sensing technology. In parallel, playing off of the unit’s space theme and the activity of “launching” an aerial imagery system, students are asked to explore Page 25.533.15 engineering ethics and safety through a unit project focusing on the 1986 Challenger disaster.The primary focus of this unit is teamwork. Other student learning objectives emphasized orintroduced in this unit are safety considerations; system decomposition; requirements; designmodification; concept generation and selection; operations planning; team
students to develop team, communication,ethical reasoning, and societal and global contextual analysis skills. Therefore it issuggested that engineering schools focus more on outcome-based approaches bypromoting flexibility and creativity in student projects.2 In some ways, theserecommendations denote a growing emphasis on design and open-ended problem solvingas opposed to the traditional close-ended problems.To respond to these recommendations, it is crucial to prepare engineering GTAs toperform effectively in new and challenging learning environments. Since training isconsidered an important part of the GTA experience, it would be very beneficial tounderstand the training needs that can contribute to GTAs’ professional growth.Generally, there
industry engineering learning that happens in working in open source software companies them Sustainability and student P5 BS in civil engineering; minor in philosophy environmental awareness Ethical reasoning and social responsibility in engineers and developing those attributes; human- BS and MS in computer engineering; A young
reform and engineering education research grant,Departmental Level Reform (DLR), awarded to a group of engineering and education faculty inthe university [4, 5, 6]. The first course in the program, Engineering Exploration (ENGE 1024),is the most affected course by the DLR project. This course primarily focuses on hands-ondesign, problem solving, professional ethics and skills, contemporary issues like sustainability,globalization, nanotechnology, and critical thinking skills [7]. This course is taken byapproximately 1700 freshmen every year. The course delivery format includes one 50-minutelecture followed by one 110-minute hands-on workshop every week.One of the learning objectives of this course is gaining the ability to develop and
sameinstructor during the 10-week fall quarter 2011. The courses were SE 1 (Introduction toStructures and Design), which ended up with 178 students, and SE 103 (Conceptual StructuralDesign), which ended up with 123 students. SE 1 serves as the very first Structural Engineeringcourse (freshman level) and is a survey of the field of Structural Engineering, covering topicssuch as introduction to structural components of civil and aerospace structures, the designprocess, engineering ethics, and cost-benefit analysis. SE 103’s objective is to introduce students(junior level) to the creative aspects of the design process and to the professional aspect of theindustry