; Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education FIGURE 3 Remote SCADA System One-Line Diagr am ExampleUndergraduate ProgramPresently, the Power Systems Simulator is being re-integrated into the laboratory section of anundergraduate course, Power Systems Analysis 1, at UPJ. Initially, the simulator will be used asa demonstration tool to reinforce the theoretical material studied in the lecture portion of thecourse. As the students become more familiar with the equipment, they will actually complete aset of laboratory assignments that have been designed for use with the simulator. An outline ofthe various laboratory assignments by topic is as
-time DSP software, selected software modules, with and without minor errors, are provided to the students. In addition, the students are provide with multiple references, including textbooks, lab manuals and web sites, and encouraged to independently search for supplemental material and legally available software.· Another issue is how to address the added load to the student curriculum credits. This issue, however, remains to be resolved. The current course (ECE455) is 3 credit hours with three 50-minute lectures per week. The integration of laboratory exercises has added a 3-hour lab per week into the existing course without reducing the lecture time or increasing the credit hours to 4 (3 for lecture and 1 for lab
communications systems in aircraft, including intra-vehicle MIMO performance. She has been involved in the Society of Women Engineers and the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers chapter government and activities. She is presently involved in the TA Scholar Program at the University of Utah working on a project to improve teaching and learning in her department.Cynthia Furse, University of Utah Dr. Cynthia Furse is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Utah and the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Studies. She is the PI of an NSF DLR project – Integrated System Level Design -- and an NSF STEP program -- Utah’s Engineers: A Statewide Initiative
Partnering with PhysicsAbstractThis work-in-progress paper will describe an effort at curriculum reform for the first yearengineering program at Texas A&M University. A variety of motivations for, and challengesencountered in this effort are discussed, which highlight how educational change often takesplace in tension between educational theory and institutional constraints. Preliminary discussionof results and future plans for assessment are discussed.IntroductionRetention of engineering students continues to be a concern nationally [1]. There are perhapsadditional pressures for improvement in retention at large state institutions, where legislatureskeenly watch metrics such as retention, and where the institutions have a mission to serve
. Christian and Community Service is an integral partof the Cedarville experience. Our students look for ways to incorporate service projects into theircurriculum. The faculty are more than willing to support such projects. Whether for a family living inthe Miami Valley here in Ohio, or a missionary working in Timbuktu (before entering the Old Guardcompetitions, a team of our seniors actually designed a ferry that could be manufactured in Mali, Africafor a missionary to use to cross the Niger River during its flood season), projects that help people tendto touch the hearts of the judges.4. Organization and Effective Delivery Combine to 60% of the Score. Over the 10 years duringwhich I have observed our regional Old Guard Oral Competition, the upgrade
earned only a D+ in a recent American Society of Civil Engineers’ (ASCE)survey2. This ASCE report also estimates that the investment needs to bring the condition ofthese deteriorated systems to an “acceptable level” is estimated at more than 1.6 trillion dollars.Consequently, we must emphasize the maintenance and renewal of our infrastructure by usingsound infrastructure management principles.The term “infrastructure management” has been used since the 1980s to describe the activitiesinvolved in maintaining and rehabilitating civil infrastructure systems, such as transportation,water, and wastewater. Transportation infrastructure management has typically focused onsystems of bridges or pavements. More recently, the term “asset management” has
differentproducts and services [26],[27]. This field has experienced exponential growth over the last twodecades, driven by events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and increased financial support.Several trends dominate the biotech industry today, each with exciting developments. Theproposed track and certification program offer courses related to both medical biotechnology andindustrial biotechnology. Curriculum design has been developed by faculty with extensivebackground in this area. Courses include Introduction to Biotechnology, Genetics and GeneticsLaboratory, Molecular Biology and Lab, Industrial Biotechnology, Bioinformatics, and SystemBiology and Biotechnology.IV.3.3 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Track :The Artificial Intelligence track integrates
which service learning can beintegrated into an academic class. While a common model is one wherestudents perform community service by directly volunteering or workingwithin a community agency, that integration method does not often matchthe curriculum of an engineering class. Hence, in 2.009, students take aproject model approach in which they work on solving an appliedengineering problem that community clients have targeted as a key need.All teams have the same general task of working with a client to create aworking prototype, but teams working on a service learning projectprovide community service by delivering a product prototype that has aclear service benefit to an identified under-served community group.While all teams communicate and
has also initiated an exchange program for faculty and students to visit the University of Utah and receive integrated training in applied research, non‐technical skills, and global competencies. Similar to the previously described components, the emphasis on the exchanges and training is the Water SDG. For example, the recent mission had joint research group meetings where alignment of research with the Water SDG was emphasized, a curriculum streamlining meeting that assessed the degree programs and their alignment with the Water SDG, and an Executive Seminar on Achieving the Water SDGs in Pakistan. The exchanges and training activities support development of all four capitals, with an emphasis on human
: • Developing internships • Working with consortiums • Developing industry connections • Maintaining strong and current articulation agreements • Keeping a focus on global connections Page 11.1175.2This ongoing project has significantly impacted OIT’s BS degree option programs inmanufacturing engineering technology, mechanical engineering technology, and mechanicalengineering, as well as the MS degree in manufacturing engineering technology. OIT hasestablished an MMET program that is a living and metamorphosing curriculum adapting to theneeds of the market place, which consists of both the students and industry. The course work isdesigned to
participation ofsteering oversight board and steering oversight committees at each level. Figure 2 representstypical curriculum lifecycle for an individual program, such as Smart Power Engineering,Electric Power Fundamentals, etc. It has a number of program outcomes and course outlines2. Fig.2. Curriculum Development for Typical ModuleFigure 3 represents curriculum structure of interrelated modules delivered either at one or atmultiple institutions. Administration and delivery infrastructure are unified and linked toconditions in Fig. 2. Such a structure with distributed modules and unified administration anddelivery network reflects the concept of the consortium by providing flexibility, integration ofexpertise, and
replacement for Chalk based teaching, each interactive way to learn with internet and PowerPoint presentation, posting coursework materials and communicating with the instructor) 5. In your student perspective, provide other suggestions to improve the teaching (technologically) that might enhance the future students’ learning process.Appendix – B: Final Examination 1. What is academic integrity? Provide an example that you have held in this semester as a part of academic integrity. 2. Have you registered for Spring 2019 semester? YES | NO If YES, how many credit hours did you register? Who helped you in advising in selecting your courses and in guiding the registration process? If NO, state the cause and how
of different disciplines and motivations. Universities have recognized this needand have adapted their curriculum to place additional emphasis on teaching the skills necessaryto be an effective team member. Yet universities, constrained by their organizational structureand missions, cannot completely mimic the realities of the workplace business environment.Classes have a finite length and students quickly learn that any problem can be endured throughthe academic quarter instead of truly working out a sustainable solution. Teams composed ofmembers with similar expertise are often willing to cover for the weaker team member due to theshort team life which is usually measured in weeks. In teams with mixed expertise, gradesearned are often
, math success, K-12 STEM curriculum and accreditation, and retention and recruitment of STEM majors.Anne Hay, Boise State University Anne Hay is the Coordinator of the Idaho SySTEMic Solution, a K-12 research project at Boise State University funded by the U.S. Department of Education. Ms. Hay has more than 25 years of teaching experience in K-12 through college programs, teaching German, English as a foreign language, biology, general science, life science, ecology and music. She received a B.A. and an M.S. in biology from Stanford University and a Teaching Credential from the University of California, Berkeley.Joshua Pfiester, Boise State University Joshua Pfiester is a Doctoral Student in Curriculum &
growth of knowledge, theever accelerating pace of technological advances and the complex and intertwined social,economic and technical relationships evolving in society, led to drastic alterations in engineeringcurricula. Engineering education attempted to integrate physical science, mathematics,engineering science, social science, economics, humanities and analysis in an unprecedentedattempt to accomplish both breadth and specialization in a four-year degree. Because of thiseffort, several key exposures were eliminated. At many institutions, the unintended victims of thiseffort were integration and synthesis, engineering design, engineering process, laboratories anddevice centered approaches to education.This flaw in engineering education
. Page 22.98.14 13 7. Cordes D. Teaching an integrated first-year computing curriculum: Lessons learned.Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference 1997.8. Craig A, Bullard L and Joines J. Computing across curricula. Proceedings of the ASEEConference 2008.9. Deek F, Friedman R and Kim H. Computing and composition as an integrated subject insecondary school curriculum. Proceedings of the ASEE Conference 2002.10. Dunne B, Blauch A and Sterian A. The case for computer programming instruction forall engineering disciplines. Proceedings of the ASEE Conference 2005.11. Finlayson B. Introduction to chemical engineering computing. Proceedings of the
, 19974. Groover, Mikell P., Automation, Production Systems, and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Prentice Hall,2nd ed., 2000.5. Singh, N. and Rajamani, D., Cellular Manufacturing Systems: Design, Planning and Control, John Wiley andSons Inc., 19966. Sekine, K., One-Piece Flow: Cell Design for Transforming the Production Process, Productivity Press, 19927. Monden, Y., Toyota Production System: An Integrated Approach to Just-in-Time, 2 nd ed., Institute of IndustrialEngineers Press, 1993JON H. MARVELJon H. Marvel is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Grand Valley State University. He holds a BE fromStevens Institute of Technology, an MS from the University of Michigan and a Ph.D. the University of Cincinnati.His is primary responsible for
learning resources amongteaching academics and between institutions. Further, there seems to be a specific resistance tosharing those materials that support the teaching and learning of technical content1.Collaborations seen in research networks seem not to have equivalent presence in teaching andlearning, despite a literature that points to the benefits of sharing curriculum resources 2,3.A few projects funded by the Federal Office for Learning and Teaching (OLT) in Australia havemade freely available resources as deliverables (A proactive approach to addressing studentlearning diversity in engineering mechanics 4; Promoting student engagement and continualimprovement: Integrating professional quality management practice into engineering
. Table 1. SCENIC infrastructure for place-based engineering in rural schools Tools • Integration into science courses available at the schools o Rural schools do not need to have an engineering course • Soil and air quality monitoring equipment o “Pods” provided by the university which could be too expensive for schools • Online curriculum, support and mentorship o Remote learning using free curriculum Partnerships • Local partners (i.e., community members, businesses, ranches, etc.) • University partners (i.e., instructors, researchers, and other universities
Learning Curricular Development ProjectBefore starting AY2023-2024 and implementing the new experiential learning curriculardevelopment project into the Chemical Product Design course, the instructors understood thatcertain deliverables for this project may slightly deviate from previous product designprojects. This misalignment is due to the limited market for experiential learning in the coreChE curriculum. As such, the focus, goal, or method to obtain certain deliverables may beslightly different. Table 2 as well as the following paragraph explain some of the coursedeliverables and how the experiential learning team achieved them.Table 2: Selected Course Deliverables for Chemical Product Design 1 and how an experientiallearning development team
traditional model ofengineering education—simply learn a multitude of skills and being satisfied with thereassurance that someday and in some mysterious way, they might become useful.References 1. John R. Waltrit and Charles J. Martin, “Longitudinal Assessment of the Integrated Curriculum in Engineering (ICE),” FIE 21002, http//fie.engrng.edu/fie2002/index.htm 2. Matthew W. Ohland and Benjamin L. Sill, “Communicating the Impact of an Introduction Engineering Course to Engineering Departments,” http//fie.engrng.edu/fie2002/index.htm 3. Nikos J. Mourtos and Burford J. Furman, “Assessing the Effectiveness of an Introductory Engineering Course for Freshman,” FIE2002, http//fie.engrng.edu/fie2002/index.htm 4. N
Paper ID #16346We Assess What We Value: ”Evidence-based” Logic and the Abandonmentof ”Non-Assessable” Learning OutcomesDr. Donna M. Riley, Virginia Tech Donna Riley is Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 We Assess What We Value: “Evidence-based” Logic and the Abandonment of “Non-assessable” Learning OutcomesAbstractThis paper seeks to analyze the recent proposed changes to ABET’s baccalaureate-levelprograms accreditation General Criteria 3 (Student Outcomes) and 5 (Curriculum) in light of
first is materials and processes which includes traditional machining,materials science, CNC machining and processes, and additive manufacturing. The second thrustarea is plant floor operations and includes statistical process control, lean manufacturing, PLCs,sensors, and actuators. An additional advanced manufacturing thrust includes robotics andautomation, automated inspection systems, and MES. These three thrust areas are correlated tothe four pillars of manufacturing knowledge in the following sections.The manufacturing engineering curriculum consists of traditional pre-engineering courses suchas calculus, physics, chemistry, and other core requirements. Fundamental engineering and mathcourses include graphics and 3D modeling, statistics
help students develop an integrated knowledge of a specific subject. In thispaper, we share our experience in achieving these goals by adding a model-building project to Page 22.1220.3the curriculum of an existing course.Manufacturing Automation and Control Course ModificationThe author teaches an undergraduate-level manufacturing automation and control course forEngineering Technology students at a U.S. university. The course covers the following topics:(1) programmable logic controllers and programming, (2) sensor technology, (3) industrialrobots and programming, (4) vision system, and (5) industrial interfaces. These are major typesof
Evaluation Form Page 25.286.5IV. Project DesignThe focus of this pilot study project was to develop a prototype of an Electronic Name Tag(ENT) system. This project focuses on creating an ENT that can be used for conferences,visitors’ badges etc. The development of the ENT will help the world become moreenvironmentally friendly. The ENT consists of a microcontroller, the brain of the system, whichis a programmable electronic integrated circuit with built in processor memory and peripherals.The microcontroller is programmed using the Basic Stamp Editor program. The microcontrolleruses this program to display the information on the liquid crystal
feed into the RFP response. All construction, vertical andhorizontal, has business components which accreditation boards deem essential tothe curriculum. The proposal will add to each course mix a strong businesscomponent of interested graduate students who would like to become more fluentwith aspects of construction while enriching the group with their knowledge andexpertise, as well as providing mentors and speakers to the whole class.The first year, faculty from other departments and colleges are involved as studentmentors. The second year, the faculty is further engaged and involved in (a)setting the integrated research agenda, (b) defining the experiential component ofproject RFP and selecting guest speakers from industry, (c) defining
integrative skills and approaches as well asspecialized training in a "discipline". Engineering education has emphasizedteaching specific components of knowledge-- “Statics”, “Strength of Materials”,“Heat Transfer”, “Electric Power” --without providing sufficient opportunities torelate all of these components into a unified understanding of system behavior.At the engineering undergraduate level, the curriculum is organized around adiscipline such as “Civil”, “Mechanical”, or “Electrical” engineering with aselection of courses from various subdisciplines, such as communication,controls, and structures. At the engineering graduate level this specializationbecomes even sharper. Universities are organized around disciplines andinterdisciplinary
integrated roboticsystem. The standard curriculum in the robotics course focuses on the programming of individualrobots, but the students never use the PLC to setup the I/O configuration. By completing thistutorial experiment, the students can gain a better understanding of how an integrated system isdeveloped and controlled.Advanced application – Quality controlThis experiment performs quality control testing on machined parts and sorts them based onpreset tolerances. The devices used in the physical part of the experiment are a YK220X SCARArobot, a YK250X SCARA robot, a machine vision camera, a conveyor belt, and a photoelectricsensor. The layout of the components in the workcell can be observed in Figure 9. Figure 9: Robotic cell
establish an Industrial EngineeringIndustry Advisory Board (IAB) and have these leaders from industry meet to establish aorganizational charter and to define their leadership structure. The faculty committee definedcriteria for inviting individuals to become charter members of the Industrial Engineeringprogram IAB. Six members were invited to join the IAB and five of these members attended theinaugural IAB meeting in November 2004. This meeting provided the IAB members with anoverview of the existing IE Program at TAMUC and helped them understand their role inimproving the engineering curriculum over time. This meeting also served as a forum to defineand discuss their critical role as our link to industry as engineering needs evolve. The IAB
-onprogramming experience, students develop the proficiency to apply computational tools insimulating and solving problems related to heat transfer, fluid dynamics, structural integrity, andother critical aspects of mechanical systems. The course aims to equip students with thenecessary skills to effectively utilize numerical methods and computer programming in thecontext of mechanical engineering, thereby preparing them for their future courses as well asreal-world engineering applications.This three-credit course is traditionally offered in two sections during autumn semesters, with anaverage enrollment of 100 students in each section, and in one section during spring semesters,with an average enrollment of 250 students. The course comprises two