volunteer engineers.After the fourth month of programming, librarians and ASCE volunteers completed a survey andinterviews. All library staff and nearly all ASCE representatives agreed that collaborating with their partnerlibrary or ASCE branch benefited their organization. ASCE volunteers valued librarians’ expertise inworking with youth and appreciated that they took the lead in planning program activities and logistics,which made it easier for volunteers to participate in outreach. Librarians acknowledged the dedication andenthusiasm of their ASCE partners and valued their content knowledge both because it exposed theirpatrons to real-life engineers, but also because it made library staff feel more comfortable presenting thistype of program
,networking, the Linux operating system, nor circuitry, they are encouraged to look and usetutorials and materials available on the Internet as well as collaborate with their peers.The evaluation is to the group as a whole, each team member will have the same grade. Theevaluation has four instances throughout the semester: - Proposing the project: The team has to come up with three ideas for a project after two weeks from the start of the semester. They have to choose one out of those three to start the development and planning process. The ideas are presented to the class, where peers and the instructor can make comments and ask questions, further solidifying their projects details. Students propose three ideas and receive
NSF Advance-PLAN projectdesigned to address gender equity through policy change on a statewide level. The project isbased on the model of change that identifies effective change as a top-down policy drivenapproach through a central authority, in this case, a statewide board of regents that oversees allpublic universities. The model for top-down change is particularly suited to a small, rural statewhere a) n-values for gender related statistics at any institution may not be statisticallysignificant b) institutional relations allow for cross-state cooperation and c) size of theinstitutions allows for timely implementation and assessment of policies. In addition,intercollegiate cooperation allows for provosts of all six institutions to serve as
intermediate dynamics is useful in a real-life setting.Figure 4 captures student responses regarding ancillary skills they may have developed as aresult of the project. Here the results were more mixed. Based on subplots B and C the majorityof students felt the project did help them in experimental planning and data capture and inlearning new ways to produce visualizations in MATLAB. However, few students found theproject provided practice in producing physical hardware using campus MakerSpaces. This islikely because many teams ended up producing their sensor mountings using off-the-shelfcomponents and did not need to use the campus facilities.Finally, Figure 5 presents results regarding how much students enjoyed the project and how wellthey thought
. Be in touch! Katey.Shirey@knowlesteachers.org9th-grade Units, Food Availability Theme 10th-grade Units, Water Theme(State standardized tests: Biology & Geometry) (State standardized tests: Chemistry & Algebra II)1) Design a flexible room plan to support productive 7) Create a water filter to be used at a specific site ingroup inquiry and learn about ratios, composite India, Canada, Australia, or Kenya and learn aboutfigures, nature of science, and defining a challenge. circles, Reimann Sums, chemical properties and site analysis.2) Design a portable microscope to identify pathogenson crops and learn about life, cells, optics
the Master Teacher was to aidother teachers in course module development and assessment, to host Brown Bag Seminar, andto co-organize one-day teacher conference. The teacher recruitment was more challenging than we anticipated. We planned to recruit12 teachers but was only able to accept 8 among those who met the criteria. We have preparedthe RET 3-fold flyers and setup a dedicated website for the RET program. The PI gave apresentation on the RET site program in the Area 5 Mini-CAST conference hosted by ScienceTeachers Association of Texas for Texas Region 5, where LU is located as the only four-yearuniversity. Even though some teachers expressed their interests, many did not apply even afterthe PI followed up with invitation emails
microgravity on aRussian airliner with S7 Airlines. The official contest launch day was March 5th, 2019, andsubmissions were accepted until May 6th, 2019. The contest prompted student teams, under theguidance of one adult advisor, to submit their idea for an art project to launch on Blue Origin’sNew Shepard launch vehicle. The overall goal of the contest was to encourage students ages11-18 to participate in artistic creativity within the realm of aerospace engineering designprojects. The focus of the contest submission was on the formation of plans and ideas, not a fullyengineered detailed project outline. The main sponsor for Art in Space was Cognizant, a leadingcompany in encouraging continuous learning and preparing for the technology of the
apply to studentprojects, as shown in Table 1. Table 1: Common causes of systems engineering failures. Adapted from [13]. Systems engineering failure causesFailed to consider Actor(s) in the organization failed to consider an aspect in the system design. In many cases,design aspect this causal action describes a design flaw, such as a single-point failure or component compatibility.Used inadequate Actor(s) in the organization used inadequate justification for a decision.justificationFailed to form a Actor(s) in the organization failed to form a contingency plan to implement if an unplannedcontingency plan event occurred.Lacked experience
de Asuncion. Later the same year, he is appointed to lead the research department of the School of Engineering. From 2017 he is appointed to be the head of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Universidad Nacional de Asuncion. He is currently working as the director of the Planning Directorate of the Paraguayan Space Agency. For his contributions to the Paraguayan society in the field of science and engineering, he was acknowledged as the ”Exceptional Protagonist of 2017” by the Ultimahora news, a major newspaper in Paraguay. Another distinction, the ”Outstanding Citizen Award,” was granted by the city council of the city of Asuncion in 2017.Dr. Derlis Ortiz CoronelLucas Domingo Moreira Bogado, Facultad de
outcomesaddressed include the following: 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 5. an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives This paper will look at key issues of the report as they are presented by NCSEA and fromthe perspective of engineering educators. The conclusion of this paper proposes a “short course”or workshop outline in order to facilitate implementation in a curriculum at a small scale. It willcover SE3 topics relating to management and organizational leadership and consider theirapplicability to students in both engineering management and
Graph paper (preferably with large squares) Code + Chords Software (on our website) Pencil Shape Reference Worksheet (on last page) Code + Chords Youtube Video: Coding a Shape* *Note: Code + Chords videos are meant to be watched in sequential order, and this activity should only be used after watching the previous videos. Lesson Plan.1 Show students the Code + Chords video: Coding a Shape. This video will cover the basic shapes of the Code + Chords software and how to create them. 6 Ask students to then create a rectangle. Remind
imposterphenomenon. The ALA panel described in [4] includes a description of how mentors at thePhoenix Public Library take a year to monitor new selectors followed by deeper training.Another key assumption outlined in [10] is that training is required at both a macro and microlevel. The macro level includes subject expertise, the publishing landscape and knowledge aboutdisciplinary patterns and habits. Many articles described their in-depth training methods for newselectors [11], [12], [13]. One paper describes an intensive six-month collection developmenttraining program that University of Tennessee at Knoxville undertook for new selectors that wasvideotaped for future generations as training. The training included topics such as selection,approval plans
) to increase undergraduate students’ interests in pursuing advanceddegrees in water science/engineering, with a particular emphasis on women and minorities.In addition to the program-level objectives, we identified five student-level outcomes thatprovide a framework for the assessment plan. We proposed that through participating in thisREU, students would: (S1) conduct independent research in water science or engineering; (S2)gain an understanding of urban water infrastructure challenges and the ERC’s systems-levelapproach; (S3) experience the enthusiasm and passion our ERC research team has for waterscience and engineering; (S4) express increased interest in pursuing graduate degrees inengineering and science; (S5) demonstrate increased
solutions, aiming for50 solutions during a 20-minute brainstorm session. Lastly, students are given one hour to picktheir top three ideas, quickly prototype them and exchange feedback with peers.Project Week 4During this week’s lab, students first summarize the feedback they receive for their prototypesfrom the previous lab. Afterwards, they choose a list of criteria to evaluate their prototypes andconstruct a decision matrix to pick their top design solution. They then plan on how toimplement their top solution by creating a bill of materials and developing a Gantt chart.Project Week 5This week’s lab is for proposal presentation. Each student team gives a 5-min presentation topitch their project. Students are asked to use the Need, Approach
was sponsored bythe FAA with the intent of increasing educational opportunities for young students and motivatingstudents to consider STEM-related careers. A secondary goal was to generate foundational materials,plans, and tools so the camp elements could be replicated by others across the USA.This paper outlines the long-term motivation for UAF’s involvement in this Drone Camp and relatedactivities, as well as skills learned by the students participating. It highlights the FAA mechanism topush STEM education, the approaches used, and details the camp structure. It also details lessonslearned from this 1st event, including student feedback, and provides a look at future outreach activitiesto be conducted over the next couple
oftheir individual skills and how those perceptions evolved as students gained knowledgeand experience. This section summarizes and discusses the findings.Quantitative ResultsQuantitative data was gathered through surveys and CATME peer evaluations. Thesurveys asked students to rate their self-perception on skills in: - Q1: effectively communicating - Q2: resolving conflicts - Q3: managing a team (e.g., establishing goals, organizing, and planning tasks) - Q4: enjoying teamwork (e.g., building rapport and fostering inclusiveness) - Q5: delegating tasks and trusting othersThe rating scale included five options: “strongly disagree,” “disagree,” “neutral,”“agree,” and “strongly agree”. The first three were considered
with them to the software industry. Additionally, instructors can use this feedback from students to determine more difficult to comprehend topics that they should target when using guided PCR in CS2 course.C. Students’ feedback: Error checklist needs improvement Insights: We discovered that some students were unable to follow the error checklist thoroughly because steps were unclear and some of the students found the checklist distracting. The researcher plan to make improvements on the error checklist prior to conducting further experiment. We will also need to conduct more extensive training that will communicate to the students the purpose of the checklist in PCR and demonstrate to the students the correct way to use the
sustainability and climate action, using methods from visual and environmental anthropology, popular education, asset-based community development, partic- ipatory facilitation, and museum education. Since August 2015, she has been the inaugural Director of the Center for Serve-Learn-Sustain at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Serve-Learn-Sustain is a campus-wide academic initiative launched in January, 2016 to prepare students to use their disciplinary expertise to address the world’s most pressing sustainability challenges in ways that advance community well-being and create thriving natural systems. Dr. Hirsch is Adjunct Associate Professor in the School of City and Regional Planning at Georgia Tech and serves on the
or develop new ones(Medwell, &Wray, 2014). Also, the process of planning requires reflection of personalknowledge and experiences. Smart and Winograd (2013) explain clearly that, “experience ofitself does not result in learning, rather reflection is a deliberate act requiring planning, it is anactive, persistent and considered process requiring the practitioner to become aware of and tochallenge that which is taken for granted.” Consequently, the reflection that comes withexperiential learning is vital to the retention of knowledge. Knowledge that can then bepersonalized is better ingrained into memory.Reflection that accompanies failure and confusion is an even stronger form of learning. Theprocess of problem solving involves continual
a success rate below 70% requires an action plan for improvement.The details and implementation process of the SEE program, the assessment of the program, andthe continuous improvements to the program are to be presented and discussed during the 2018ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.2. SEE-STEM Selection CriteriaStudents within engineering and engineering technology programs who completed their first yearand satisfy the eligibility requirements as indicated below are eligible to participate in thesummer SEE-STEM scholarship program. Student must be pursuing a Bachelor of Science (B.S.) degree in at least one of the following disciplines: Mechatronics Engineering Mechanical Engineering
counterpartsbecause they do not matriculate with prior knowledge on how the academic process works. Tothat end, effective mentoring and counselling can help them through the transitional process. Inthis paper, a case study of a mentoring program that is specifically designed to help FGengineering students at a major university is presented. The paper discusses the implementationprocess of the mentoring program including recruiting of faculty/staff mentors, student peermentors, the mentoring relationship management platform, and the connection plan at TexasA&M University, College Station, Texas. The paper also presents the survey results of the“initial experience” of mentees and mentors and how that has informed the future strategies tosustain and grow
” or “low” or “high” or “strongly or “do not or “strongly Statement disagree” “disagree” know” “agree” agree” (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)1. My interest in environmental engineering is - 3/2 6/3 5/7 3/5 1/02. My knowledge level in environmental engineering 1/0 7/7 7/4 3/5 0/1 research is -3. I am planning to pursue graduate study in environmental
have been impressive in sustainable urbanstructures and planning, renewable energy usage, sustainable transportation systems, and greenpolicies at the local, state and national levels [6]. All of these sustainable efforts have led toeconomic growth and innovation within Germany [6]. The German’s have instituted laws topromote a more environmentally sustainable country, the product of decades of work totransform their country into a “green” energy, urban and transportation model. Germany hasprospered under this sustainable plan and maintained growth, even after the recession in 2008,emerging with a strong economy [6]. The German government’s current sustainabledevelopment strategy plan is based on a long term holistic, integrated approach with
this educational research project, game-based in-class and after-class learning activities aredeveloped to teach selected inventory control strategies to undergraduate and graduate students.Students from Supply Chain Management and System Simulation courses are targeted, who aretaught by different instructors. The activities include teaching the inventory control policies tostudents in a regular class setting, then providing an overview on a game developed on MS Excel.In the game, the lead time and customer demand variables are defined uncertain, and not given tostudents, which make the assignment an ill-structured problem. A 12-month planning andexecution period is given to students with qualitative and quantitative information about
linkages between knowing, learning, and analytics, andthat knowing is not an objectively defined or agreed-upon term [14].Since the main thrust of this paper is about designing navigating and planning instructional andassessment activities, the knowledge-learning-instruction (KLI) framework [12] developed out ofthe knowledge tracing literature [13] serves as a productive starting point. The KLI frameworkdifferentiates between observable events (instructional events and assessment events) andunobservable events (learning events). Therefore, moves by an instructor (instructional events)aimed at producing learning (learning events) set up moments during which the learnerdemonstrates knowing (assessment events). The learning that occurs as a result of
not commonly addressed in the IBC. Supplement Code excerpts (IBC and other), permitting forms, website links, Handouts building plans, specifications, Examples Ideal Utilized to first highlight what a provision means. Idealized or simplified plans Real Real project photographs and plans Utilized to show how to expand a code provision to a real project that has complexity. Material in a professional setting similar to what they would see upon graduation
beginningFall 2016 semester. The university’s recent strong partnership with this major EngineeringProcurement Construction (EPC) Company also makes telecommunications, oil & gas pipeline,electrical power transmission and renewable energy curriculum central to the University andCollege’s strategic planning that will produce future engineering technology graduates who areready for implementing conventional and renewable energy technologies and applications ontheir areas of concentrations. This strategic partnership targets to support current and futureacademic program developments, enhances curriculum based on company’s needs and finallyestablishes a pro-active relationship to prepare Sam Houston State University students for thefuture workforce
. Malaysia educational statistics," Educational Data Sector, Educational Planning and Research Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia, July 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.moe.gov.my/images/Terbitan/Buku-informasi/QUICK-FACTS- 2014/QUICK%20FACTS%202014.pdf. [Accessed Feb. 3, 2018].[14] W. Kigotho, "Jordanian women raise academic bar," University World News, no. 321, May 23, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=2014052215013392. [Accessed Feb. 3, 2018].[15] World Bank Group. "Labor force, female (% of total labor force)," The Work Bank, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.TOTL.FE.ZS. [Accessed Feb. 3, 2018].[16] L. Whitehead, "Engineering a
potentiallymake improvements in curriculum based on these findings. Therefore, this paper takes theFirst-year Engineering Honors Program at the Ohio State University in the United States andthe Engineering Experimental Class at Beihang University in China as their case studies ofinternational comparison of the entire first two years’ curriculum. As an intermediary ofteaching activities and the basic guarantee of achieving educational goals, course is ablueprint and plan for cultivating what types of people. This paper takes courses as theresearch object, compares the whole course setting, and studies the syllabi of basic coursesand teaching methods reflected in the syllabi. Methodologies including text analysis,frequency analysis, comparative research
engineering graduate students on their needs for library instruction. Thesurvey differentiated between students who are writing theses and those who are not. By lookingat students who are doing research and those who are not as two separate populations, the surveymay identify needs for instruction that go beyond common library instruction topics such asliterature reviews and the library had not previously considered. This paper will summarize theresults of the survey and discuss plans for implementation of an instruction program ofinformation literacy topics.BackgroundIn fall semester 2017, a group of graduate students in the College of Engineering (CoE) at theUniversity of Michigan (U-M) were awarded a community grant from the U-M Rackhamgraduate