Paper ID #18528Application of Indirect and Direct Measures for Student Teamwork OutcomeAssessment within an Undergraduate Civil Engineering CurriculumDr. William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel William J. Davis is a professor in Civil & Environmental Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. He received his Ph.D. in civil engineering from Georgia Tech and is a registered professional engineer. His research interests focus on infrastructure resiliency, transportation facility planning and design, highway safety, and active living by design. He teaches courses in capstone sengineeirgn design, engineering management
)”Workshop on 9-12 August 2017 in Denver, CO. The workshop was held in collaboration withthe Kern Family Foundation and Lawrence Technological University. The main goal of theworkshop is to promote student engagement in “the three Cs: Curiosity, Connections, andCreating Value” [3]. Kern Engineering Entrepreneurship Network (KEEN) published theframework at their website as shown in figure 1. The entrepreneurial mindset plus engineeringskillset has been used to develop educational outcomes for several engineering courses.Following the experience from the ICE workshop, the authors began to embed their proposedEML modules in several courses for strategic planning purposes starting in September 2017 forthe fall 2017 quarter. EE375 Electronic Design I is
Paper ID #22128Integrating Systems Thinking in Interdisciplinary Education Programs: ASystems Integration ApproachDr. Adedeji B. Badiru P.E., Air Force Institute of Technology Prof. Badiru is Dean and senior academic officer for the Graduate School of Engineering and Management at the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT). He has oversight for planning, directing, and controlling operations related to granting doctoral and master’s degrees, professional continuing cyber education, and research and development programs. He was previously Professor and Head of Systems Engineering and Management at the AFIT, Professor and
inability to demonstrate a significant change to the limited sample size of the cohort.Furthermore, the wide range of program participant backgrounds (nearly 50% of studentsindicated they had previous experience in early concept generation) contributes to the largerstandard deviation of these data, further obfuscating a significance in trend.Future Plans: We plan to make several modifications for the 2018 Clinical Immersion Program. First,considering the feedback regarding Monday working sessions, we plan to modify Mondayworkshops. We will scale didactic lectures and activities to three hours and dedicate theremainder of the workshop time to team collaboration. This time will be punctuated by facultymeeting with the teams to provide
time are required in an evolving ratio during the startup phase and beyond. Luckily,many universities have programs that enable access to both at least in small amounts. Even alean startup will likely need some funds to travel for customer discovery work, attendconferences, host a website, and pay fees associated with registering a company. Here are somethings to look for in and around your campus.Funding your ventureThe first type of funding is non-dilutive grant funding, a.k.a. free money. Pitch competitions andbusiness plan competitions are common and can serve as an early source of funding. On-campusprograms like NSF I-Corps Sites offer a small amount of money ($3,000 as of now) to get startedwith customer discovery work that can lead to a
in Making (e.g. basic electronics, 3Dmodeling and printing, and computer programming) and basic industrial engineering concerns(e.g., industrial distribution, materials acquisition, process planning, and quality assurance). It isbelieved that high school students involved in this distance apprenticeship program will developcareer and college-preparation skills.In this paper, we pose the following research question concerning our M3 model: “How may theM3 model be actualized in a low resource community?”. We aim to illustrate the following.First, we want to outline our model for motivating STEM participation, this being our ‘Making-through-Micro Manufacturing’(M3) model. We believe that through participation in our model,students will develop
exposing next generation manufacturing technologies. Presentation #1 Opening remark: US Next Generation ManufacturingOrganizer: Richard Chiou, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Engineering Technology,College of Engineering, Drexel UniversityAbstract: Insights from outside of the manufacturing industry will be explored in the workshopfrom traditional manufacturing to factory planning and utilization, quality assurance and evenresearch and development. Indeed, industrial manufacturers can best serve their customers (andthemselves) by designing tools and equipment that improve the efficiency, costs, and performanceof factories and other capital projects. Whether enhancing their or their customers
teamwork dynamic in our first-year experiences. It is unclear exactly whatenables the second semester classes to have higher averages than the first semester courses, sinceall three courses have different subject matter, different styles of projects and different sets ofinstructors. But an upward trend of better teamwork satisfaction is hopeful. Moving forwardwe want to try to isolate a few of the sections of ED1 and ED2 and let students choose teamswith no restrictions and compare to the other sections. A pilot study in Fall 2019 to Spring 2020has been planned. Other plans include looking at the effect gender has on teaming as this yearwe used CATME team maker to ensure woman and underrepresented minorities are notoutnumbered on project
failures [13]. Of the 21 causes, we consider in this work the 10 that apply to studentprojects, as shown in Table 1. Table 1: Common causes of systems engineering failures. Adapted from [13]. Systems engineering failure causesFailed to consider Actor(s) in the organization failed to consider an aspect in the system design. In many cases,design aspect this causal action describes a design flaw, such as a single-point failure or component compatibility.Used inadequate Actor(s) in the organization used inadequate justification for a decision.justificationFailed to form a Actor(s) in the organization failed to form a contingency plan to implement if an
contemplating career interestsand options [34], [35]; in this study, 82% of participants readily named at least one career ofinterest to them and several participants also identified contingency career plans. This analysisidentified a group of students (66% of our sample) who have currently identified a career ofinterest other than engineering yet are open to an engineering career. We wish to keepengineering as a career as a possible future for these students. This work suggests that it may befruitful for engineering educators to identify ways in which engineering activities intersect withstudents’ interests, thereby helping engineering study and careers to resonate with these students. 3. Classroom video dataThe video data collection for the project
Stress [kPa] 100 50 0 0 5 10 15 Strain [%]ENGRD 2020 Discussion Activity —2—Uniaxial Tension Test Group Members:A1. Spend a few minutes brainstorming with your partner about what data you will need to collect. Use the space below to plan your experiments. For example, you may want to make an empty table which lists all the data you plan on collecting.A2. Get approval from your TA of your experimental plan before proceeding.ENGRD 2020 Discussion
a professor and head of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Colorado State University. He is a fellow of IEEE. A complete vita is available at: http://www.engr.colostate.edu/ ˜aam.Ms. Andrea M. Leland, Colorado State University With nearly twenty years combined experience in higher education and private industry, Andrea Leland has distinguished herself as a dynamic communicator and tireless ambassador of engineering education and research. For the past twelve years she has worked in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Colorado State University to advance its mission through well-planned communication strategies and relationship building. Leland has played an integral role
• Deliverables: o Product—Min: 20 units plus group members o Business plan & FULL product build & tooling data o Individual: End of semester paper (The Goal) Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018 American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 325 ENTC 4357—CIM Apps Capstone Class• Multi-step Process: o Student teams determine, design, & prototype product ideas for competition o Students/Faculty vote & product teams realigned o Product refinement o Tooling design
to PeersDESIGN PROJECT IMPACT | VIDEO TESTIMONIALS SURVEYExample Questions ● Have you been active in LSAMP after your first semester of freshman year? ● Have you participated in any undergraduate research opportunities or engaged in any project innovation? ● To those who said yes above...Did participation in the LSAMP STP play a role in your decision to to pursue undergraduate research? ● Do you feel that the Design Challenge prepared you for your undergraduate discipline? ● Are you interested in attending graduate/professional school? ● Have you applied to graduate/professional school? SURVEY RESULTSWere you aware of undergraduate If yes, did you plan to seek anresearch
University in Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona), aimed atdeveloping a small-scale test bed facility to support ongoing research on the subject of novelengines, as well as enhancing academic education. The project received support from a localindustrial company (Weistec Engineering) and the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. Thepaper reports how the idea was conceived from design concept to manifestation of a demonstratorengine through detailed planning and significant team efforts. The paper describes the planningand implementation process including required course development, securing funding for theresearch, and student involvements in the design process, construction and assembly, initialtesting, lessons learned, and plans for future work. The
confidence and interest in pursuing a STEM profession. Theprogram also helped the students improve their skills in teamwork, time management, scientificwriting, and presentation.II. Overview of the ASIPRES Internship ProgramA. Recruitment of Program ParticipantsThe ASPIRES interns were recruited through an online application process. Before the recruitingprocess starts, the faculty advisor of each research project prepared a description of the project aswell as required and recommended background knowledge needed for the research project. Theapplication package includes the applicant’s GPA, intended major, STEM courses completed,other skills, training and experience, a statement of academic plan, career goals, and researchinterests, and a statement
, or a couple of students can have the ”instructor role” to ensure the ratio is met. This isa resource-intensive activity so it is easier to implement in small-sized classes and programs. AtIRE and YCP class sizes are between 8-12 and 15-18 students, respectively. However, it is notused as a regular classroom activity and only occurs one to two times a semester due to theamount of planning and setup required.Finally, the instructor decides if this is to be an individual or group activity. For an individualactivity, there should be a variety of questions both in the content area and depth so students whoare stuck on one question can move onto another and use their time wisely. More details on thissetup can be found in iteration one and two in
, seminars, and workshops, and has developed courses, videos and software packages during his career. His areas of specialization include transportation planning, Engineering and management, legal aspects, construction contract administration, Renewable Energy and public works.Dr. Curtis R. Taylor, University of Florida Dr. Curtis R. Taylor, Ph.D. is the Associate Dean for Student Affairs for the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering and Associate Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Florida (UF). Dr. Taylor leads and manages all undergraduate student service activities including aca- demic, professional, and extra-curricular activities in the College. Dr. Taylor directs the soft
]. When an instructor delivers lecturematerials using inductive learning and teaching methods, students rapidly recognize the necessityof engineering knowledge and skills to overcome the given challenge. Ref. [7] introduces manyforms of inductive learning and teaching methods such as inquiry-based learning, discoverylearning, problem-based learning, project-based learning, hybrid (problem/project-based)methods, case-based teaching, and just-in-time teaching. The challenge of implementing thesemethods are (1) logistical problem, (2) the requirement of more planning from instructors’ end,and (3) the stimulation of student resistance and interpersonal conflict (Ref. [7]). In this work,inquiry-based learning for lecture and project-based learning
holisticlearning experiences to students through targeted engagement in project design and researchactivities in lower-division levels. Summarized below are some critical elements implemented by the ASSURE-US projectduring its first year. Please note that in the first year, the project did not implement any academicintervention strategies in lower-division bottleneck courses due to the paucity of time inidentifying target courses, developing intervention plans, and providing faculty development.Student-Teacher Interaction Council (STIC) Consistent with the literature (Lisagor et al., 2013; Concepción et al., 2009), theformation of the STIC is to build rapport with students, facilitate informal communicationbetween students and faculty
todevelop and implement the ALMs and DTs.Review of existing literatureA thorough review of the current state of the art sustainability and resiliency assessments of civilinfrastructure was performed to establish the key concepts to be introduced to the students. Thereview included both national and international databases to capture all aspects of S&R. Adocument was prepared summarizing this review. Based on this review it was identified thatcertain concepts such as life cycle analysis and risk and reliability should be introduced early inthe curriculum, so that they can be used later in discipline specific assessments in junior andsenior years. Table 1 shows the planned concept delivery for each course along with thecorresponding learning
]. However, high school GPAs may not be comparable across schools because they are basedon grading criteria from different teachers in different schools with varying curricula and districtstandards.College-level academic advising begins with new student orientation during the summer prior tothe student’s first-year. During this time, students, with the guidance of an advisor, must decidehow to balance the demands of the rigorous engineering course work with the progress towarddegree. For example, is putting a first-year student in calculus, physics, chemistry, compositionand an elective (as the eight-semester degree plan expects) setting some students up for failure?Is it better to delay a science course to allow time to adjust to the dynamics of
having either agraduate or undergraduate lead the class in person, as far as the high school was from Texas A&MUniversity (TAMU), we conducted the daily class through video teleconference. Figure 3: Instructional science kits made by students in CTE.Before we formally started the class, we hosted a 1-week in-person workshop for the students inthe class. We brought the 6 students and their two teachers to TAMU campus. We did thisbecause it was necessary to properly orient the students to Making practices and skills.We structured the class around the high school’s 6-week schedule for each semester. Each week istreated as a separate production pipeline step ranging from initial review of the lesson plan:1)decomposition of kit
significant scale. In fact, the planning of a consortium needs experiencedconsortium management and leadership skills of the senior leadership team of a consortium,technical team leaders within partner organizations, and the senior management of localpartner organizations for successful funded program.Consortium Objectives:The objectives of a consortium management: 1. Favors a functional partnership between different universities and labs, by identifying the strength of each organization and create better arrangement across the partners in the consortium. 2. Identify and develop strategies for effective partnership within a consortium in order to increase the outcomes of the program. Since all the consortium
technology, solar and wind energy systems in addition to requiredMathematics, Physics, and computer science programming courses. There were two studentswith design and development minor. Although majority of students started to work full-time asof June 1, 2019; two students started to work with the faculty during Spring 2019 semester forin-advanced planning and equipment and parts purchasing purposes. A conceptual design wascompleted during spring 2019 semester as shown in Figure 3. Figure 3. Proposed conceptual design of MRRT projectTo reduce the cost of the project, variety of existing solar PV panels are planned to be used iftheir current–voltage (I-V) characteristics are not causing mismatch problems. Figure 4 exhibitsthe
to our students in choosing a SimpleLink MCU. Regarding the adoptionof an MSP432 MCU, instructors have been closely monitoring the students’ feedback and theirlearning process. In addition, instructors plan to continue to provide effective and hands-onlearning experiences to students in this embedded system integration track. Fall 2019 Total number of Number of *Mean student *Average for ESET 269, ESET 349, enrolled students responses evaluation numerical grade ESET 369 earned by students Spring 2019 349 110 *3.93 *3.19 for ESET 469 Table 1. Embedded system
academic Center inFebruary 2009. At that time, the underlying foundation for ProSTAR’s professional educationactivities was a Master of Science degree with a primary focus in technology leadership andinnovation skills including tools for process improvement and quality management.In addition, this program incorporated other innovations beyond its delivery system, scheduleand fee structure. To be consistent with its goal of developing practical skills and knowledgeimmediately, or at least quickly, applicable to business and industry, its plan of study [3]incorporates a base of essential core studies, flexible and easily tailored courses to insurerelevance to emerging technologies, and a guided, industry focused applied research anddevelopment
concerns, such as bias in algorithm designand implementation [33]. The production of more ethically conscious algorithms, will help inreducing the potential negative impact of such technologies on society[33]. This paper is divided into several sections. In section 2.0 of this paper, literature relatedto machine learning is reviewed. A synthesis of the issues related to this domain are outlined.Specifically, a discussion of the importance of incorporating ethics in computer curriculumincluding algorithm bias is presented. Section 3.0 of this paper outlines a plan for raisingawareness of algorithm bias in a newly developed Introduction to Data Science course. Sub-sections 3.1 through 3.4 detail the plan by indicating the goal, identifying
plants are opening, and car manufacturers are investing in hydrogen fuel celltechnology. Hyundai released their first hydrogen powered car for sale in January of 2019. Aircraftmanufacturers such as Airbus and Boeing are looking into hydrogen fuel cell powered aircraft [7].With increasing pressure on commercial vessels to limit their carbon footprint, maritimecompanies have been researching hydrogen fuel cell propulsion applications in river tenders,ferries, and yachts, along with applications in auxiliary systems on larger vessels, includingpowering navigational equipment and heating, ventilation, and cooling systems [4]. In 1997, the United States Coast Guard researched and developed a plan to implement afuel cell power plant on its own
discussion. The groupsearched for examples of how to build something like this but realized that there was littleevidence that this had been created before. Using knowledge gained from the Sustainable andRenewable Energy major associated with the student group and with the support of our advisor,the group began designing the grill. Figure 1: Typical designs of a solar grill found while researching optionsDesign process After considerable deliberation, RES narrowed down the numerous design ideas to fourfinal design plans that could be used for the solar grill (Figure 2). The final design optionsdiscussed by the group included: 1) retrofitting a gas grill to work as an electric grill, 2) attachingsolar modules to the sides of a