withinthe course. This aspect of the research represents an area for a deeper exploration to answer thequestion – what are the appropriate forms and levels of design experience for undergraduates indifferent engineering disciplines?With respect to possible pedagogical change, the systems mapping exercise surfacedopportunities for adaptations to the class in the mind of the instructor as well. One that stood outfrom the discussion was the recognition that some of the activities necessary to perform analysiswere not consistent with practice. In practice, an engineer would not be limited to researchingjournal articles – which the instructor said can, at times, feel like a “treasure hunt, not anengineering exercise” – to find a necessary equation or
-benefits- access-equity (accessed Aug. 16, 2020). 10[10] M. Forsey, S. Broomhall, and J. Davis, “Broadening the Mind? Australian Student Reflections on the Experience of Overseas Study,” Journal of Studies in International Education, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 128–139, May 2012, doi: 10.1177/1028315311407511.[11] K. A. Davis, D. Reeping, A. R. Taylor, D., C. Edwards, H. G. Murzi, and D. B. Knight, “Characterizing Students’ Intercultural Competence Development Paths Through a Global Engineering Program,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2--30187[12] K. A. Davis, A. R. Taylor, D. Reeping
Paper ID #23767Increasing Student Self-Efficacy through Undergraduate Research Experi-ences: A Qualitative StudyAddison J. Litton, Utah State University Addison J Litton is an undergraduate student at Utah State University, studying Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science. He is doing research in engineering education, under the direction of Dr. Wade Goodridge and his graduate assistant Mr. Benjamin Call.Dr. Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State University Wade Goodridge is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. He holds dual B.S. degrees in Industrial Technology Education
. Crawley, E. F. The CDIO Syllabus: A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate Engineering Education, MIT CDIO Report #1, 2001. Available at http://www.cdio.org31. Gronlund, N.E. (2000). How to Write and Use Instructional Objectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.32. Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New Page 12.1340.15 York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.33. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N.R., and Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York: Basic Books34. Baxter Magolda, M. B
AC 2012-3387: ENHANCING CROSS-CULTURAL INTERACTION IN COURSESWITH A LARGE COMPONENT OF VISITING STUDY ABROAD STU-DENTSDr. Alex Friess, Rochester Institute of Technology, Dubai Alex Friess holds a Ph.D. in aeronautical engineering and a B.Sc. in physics from Rensselaer Polytech- nic Institute (Troy, N.Y. 1997), and has served as Associate Professor of mechanical engineering at RIT, Dubai, since 2009. In addition to undergraduate activities, he teaches in the sustainable energy concen- tration of RIT, Dubai’s mechanical engineering master’s program. Friess’ industrial and academic career spans a variety of consulting and entrepreneurial activities in Europe, Asia, and Africa, most notably as founding faculty in
Session 2547 Combining Computer Analysis and Physical Testing in a Finite Element Analysis Course William E. Howard, Thomas J. Labus, and Vincent C. Prantil Milwaukee School of EngineeringAbstractFinite element analysis (FEA) has become an essential tool in the product design process ofmany companies. A course in FEA is required in a large number of mechanical engineering andmechanical engineering technology curricula. Most FEA courses necessarily include somebalance of theory and practical use of a commercial FEA program. In a course recentlydeveloped at Milwaukee
for three years. Theaccomplishment is still fresh in their minds many months after the event. For many, theexperience defined their undergraduate engineering education and helped them attain a self-confidence and direction to their emerging careers.II. Description of the Project and PayloadThe SPIRIT project was a joint effort of ThePennsylvania State University and SUNY Geneseo,with additional participation from LincolnUniversity. Funding was provided by Penn StateCollege of Engineering, NSF sponsored EngineeringCoalition of Schools for Excellence in Education andLeadership (ECSEL), The NASA PennsylvaniaSpace Grant Consortium, the NASA Student RocketProgram, and Lockheed Martin Corp. In addition,several companies made non-cash
Paper ID #39142Assessment of the Utilization of Open Educational Resources during andafter the PandemicDr. Janardhanan Gangathulasi, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research, Chennai,India Dr. Janardhanan Gangathulasi is Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Head of Centre for Academic Studies and Research at the National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research Chennai. Dr. Janardhanan has over 20 years of research, teaching and consulting experience within the broad fields of civil, environmental engineering and engineering education. His research expertise includes
skills upon entry to the university. Students are cohorted in three primarySTEM courses, math, chemistry, and engineering, as well as a two-credit hour learning strategiescourse that focuses on building skills around being an effective learner and STEM student.Entangled Learning was used as the pedagogical framework guiding the design of the learningstrategies course, and the course aims to enhance students’ self-regulatory behaviors, learningskills and strategies, and habits of mind. Among other assignments, student learning is assessedthrough a series of learning journal assignments, including an extensive set of exam wrapperactivities, which will be the subject of this paper.This paper will present a focused exploration of the exam wrapper
phenomenon in a waythat would otherwise be impossible [16]. These benefits, combined with the relatively low costof implementing a VR framework, make VR scanning electron microscopy an effectivealternative to a real SEM laboratory.With this in mind, a team of researchers and students (including the authors) at Utah ValleyUniversity (UVU) investigated VR as a strategy for familiarizing students with the SEM, astrategy we hope will be disseminated to additional colleges and universities to better prepare thenext generation of nanotechnology engineers. Using VR hardware, the team designed a VR labincorporating a SEM for use in training students and faculty. The complete VR lab includes fourdifferent rooms containing essential tools used in
LPRDS – A Requirements-Driven team-Based Design of a 2kW Solar Energy System William D. Jemison and Christopher T. Nadovich Electrical & Computer Engineering Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042AbstractThis paper will describe a capstone senior design course that features a team-based requirements-driven project. The project scope is selected such that thetechnical requirements are sufficiently complex to require a team-based solution.The project implementation is designed to force the students to consider realisticformal engineering requirements and specifications while offering significantopportunities for student leadership. The most recent embodiment of
LPRDS – A Requirements-Driven team-Based Design of a 2kW Solar Energy System William D. Jemison and Christopher T. Nadovich Electrical & Computer Engineering Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042AbstractThis paper will describe a capstone senior design course that features a team-based requirements-driven project. The project scope is selected such that thetechnical requirements are sufficiently complex to require a team-based solution.The project implementation is designed to force the students to consider realisticformal engineering requirements and specifications while offering significantopportunities for student leadership. The most recent embodiment of
this problem when ratingstudent applications that featured essay questions. This program incorporated scholarship fundsand structural supports to help students successfully navigate their engineering undergraduatedegree program. These supports were chosen with specific target populations in mind, namelylow-income, first-generation, mathematically underprepared, and minority students. The projectteam chose to employ personas in an attempt to create a rubric that allowed for the holistic,subjective, “I know it when I see it” style of selecting students who showed a need for thescholarship program while having a shared vision of what “it” is. This paper presents the methoddeveloped to create this rubric using personas and the experience of the
engineering) 2. Developing and using models 3. Planning and carrying out investigations 4. Analyzing and interpreting data 5. Using mathematics and computational thinking 6. Constructing explanations (for science) and designing solutions (for engineering) 7. Engaging in argument from evidence 8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating informationThere are many similarities between the practices of scientists and engineers – e.g., both includeusing computational tools to test scientific theories and predict outcomes of engineering designs.While new technologies and pedagogies now afford us many opportunities to cultivate students’S&E habits of mind,4,5,18 developing novel approaches to integrate
Paper ID #37368Reading participation and assessment of spreadsheet skills acrossmultiple cohorts when using an interactive textbookSamantha YanoskoGrant ValentineProf. Matthew W. Liberatore, The University of Toledo Matthew W. Liberatore is a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Toledo. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all in chemical engineering. From 2005 to 2015, he served on the faculty at the Colorado School of Mines. In 2018, he served as an Erskine Fellow at the Uni
Paper ID #21738Motivational Attitudes and Behaviors in Capstone Projects: QuantitativeValidation of Assessment InstrumentsBashirah Ibrahim, Ohio State University Bashirah Ibrahim is a postdoctoral researcher in engineering education at the Ohio State University.Dr. Peter Rogers, Ohio State University Dr. Peter Rogers is a Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education The Ohio State University. He joined the university in October 2008 bringing with him 35 years of industrial experience. His career includes senior leadership roles in engineering, sales, and manufacturing developing products using
-based manufacturing capstone course. It will explain how concepts are learned throughsimulation and applied through project work within the university context. Page 8.1070.1 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Session 2163Nationwide Network and Its Services The Illinois Manufacturing Extension Center (IMEC) originated in the 1990's as aresult of a funded NIST project. IMEC is staffed by an experienced group
). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.12. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.) (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.13. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R. & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.14. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.15. Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.16. Atman, C. J., & Turns, J. (2001). Studying engineering design learning: Four verbal protocol studies. In C. Eastman
production” environment. This partnership of academia, industry and government hascome together to address a basic survival issue for our quality of life in this country; acompetitive defense manufacturing base and the creation of wealth through manufacturing. Withsome few exceptions (airplanes, drugs and software come to mind) we are second class citizensin producing everything from automobiles to televisions. The urgency of meeting this challengestimulated much of the enthusiasm from the participants and contributed in no small way to thesuccess of this program.B. Industry-based Projects in AcademeToday’s Engineer cannot be working on yesterday’s problems with yesterday’s tools. They haveto understand how to work in cross functional teams, to be
Paper ID #37850Understanding How Children on the Autism SpectrumEngage in Solution Optimization during a Design ActivityHoda Ehsan (Director of Quadrivium Design and Engineering ) Hoda Ehsan is the Director of Quadrivium Engineering and Design, and the Chair for Engineering and Computer Science departments at The Hill School. She holds a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Monica E Cardella (Director) Monica E. Cardella is the Director of the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education (SUCCEED) at Florida International University. She is also a Professor of Engineering and
Administrators in Higher Education.Donald Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Donald Carpenter, Ph.D., P.E., LEED AP is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering. He is actively involved in ASEE, is a Kern Fellow for Entrepreneurial Education, and serves as Director of Assessment for Lawrence Tech. His research interests involve academic integrity, assessment of student learning, and water resources.Janel Sutkus, Carnegie Mellon University Janel A. Sutkus, Ph.D., is Director of Institutional Research and Analysis at Carnegie Mellon University, where she is responsible for analysis and assessment of all administrative and academic functions. Her work focuses on student engagement
. Mugayitoglu has more than 16 publications, including peer-reviewed conference papers, conference posters, conference presentations, a journal article, and a book chapter.Dr. Mike Borowczak, University of Wyoming Dr. Mike Borowczak is an Assitant Professor of Computer Science and the Director of the Cybersecurity Education and Research center (CEDAR) at the University of Wyoming. He earned his Ph.D. in Computer Science and Engineering (2013) as well as his BS in Computer Engineering (2007) from the University of Cincinnati. His research focused on detection and prevention of information leakage from hardware side channels. His current research interests include investigating the safety, resilience, and security of
PerspectiveThe faculty member had straight-forward goals, centered around the student learning skills andconcepts, both soft and technical, that are seldom fully developed in a typical engineering course.The overall goal, in the mind of the faculty member, was not to entirely recreate an existingsecurity design but rather to give foundational understanding to the student and allow the studentto grow as an engineer. The student grew in their understanding of cybersecurity, digital hardwareengineering, research methods, and more. As such, the project was a success. As with manyprojects, time and resources were limited, but despite that, the results, from the supervisor’s view,were positive.5 Recommendations from the Student5.1 Recommendations for
Paper ID #35616The New Normal: Student Perspectives on Supportive University Policiesduring COVID and BeyondMaimuna Begum Kali, Florida International University Maimuna Begum Kali is a Ph.D. student in the Engineering and Computing Education program at Florida International University (FIU), in the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Ed- ucation (SUCCEED). She completed her B.Sc. in Computer Science and Engineering at the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET) in Bangladesh. She began her Ph.D. study in Com- puter Science but changed her program to Engineering and Computing
ASEE 2010 ZONE IV CONFERENCE MARCH 25-27 RENO, NEVADA PROCEEDINGSEDUCATING ENGINEERS IN THE WILD, WILD WEST HOSTED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO SPONSORED BY THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST, PACIFIC SOUTHWEST, & ROCKY MOUNTAIN SECTIONS OF ASEE TABLE OF CONTENTSFRIDAY, MARCH 26, 2010CONCURRENT SESSIONS, 8:30-10:00 A.M.Session DM: Designing and Manufacturing“Bicycle Frame Building for Engineering Undergraduates” Kurt Colvin & Jim Kish .............................................................................................................................. 1“GIRLS SEE Summer Camp: An Event
Employer and STEM Core Student Interactions Because STEM and technology employers traditionally recruit engineering internsexclusively from four-year colleges, they are used to meeting interns in-person for the first timeon their first day. As UW’s National Survey of College Internships reports (Joy, 2022), theaverage distance from a student’s home to an in-person site for internship was 331 miles. As stated, many employers are new to working with Community College students and donot see community colleges as producing the skills their company needs. With this in mind,Growth Sector and the STEM Core Network have worked deliberately with employers todevelop opportunities for employers to meet STEM Core students prior to an
Session 1149 The Next Level in TC2K: Continuous Quality Improvement Susan Scachitti, Gregory Neff, and James Higley Purdue University CalumetAbstractMany educators in engineering technology are currently working on preparations for theirnext accreditation visit by the Technology Accreditation Commission (TAC) of theAccreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET). With these visits come aneed to understand new evaluation criteria, TC2K; criteria focused on improving thequality of student outcomes.The TC2K evaluation criteria is a quality based standard that begins with basic qualityconcepts. This
, 2000]. In this manner students will engage in problem-based educational activities that notonly teach them subject specific content knowledge but help them develop into life-long learnersand problems solvers.7. AcknowledgementsThis work was supported primarily by the Engineering Research Centers Program of theNational Science Foundation under Award Number EEC-9876363. We thank Dr. Joseph T.Walsh and Dr. A.J. Welch for feedback during the development of this module.8. BibliographyBransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR (eds) How People Learn : Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (ExpandedEdition), National Academic Press, (2000)Schwartz, D. L. & Bransford, J. D. A time for telling. Cognition Instruction, 16, 475-522 (1998).Schwartz, D. L., &
Paper ID #41713Cultivating Scientific Communication Skills through Professional DevelopmentCourse Series for the Graduate CurriculumBritney Russell, University of ConnecticutAntigoni Konstantinou, University of ConnecticutAyah Abdallah, University of ConnecticutDr. Fayekah Assanah, University of Connecticut Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, 260 Glenbrook Road, Unit 3247, Storrs, CT 06269-3247. Dr. Fayekah Assanah is an Assistant Professor in Residence in the Biomedical Engineering Department. She leads multiple initiatives in the university’s undergraduate and graduate curriculum and directs the
Paper ID #38051Towards a Personalized Learning Approach toBroadenParticipation in Computer Science and PromoteComputational ThinkingEmmanuel Johnson (Postdoctoral Research Associate) Post Doctoral Research Associate USC Information Sciences InstituteTeresa M Ober (Assistant Research Professor)Philip GonsalvesMayank KakodkarJanice Zdankus (Vice President, Office of CTO) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Towards a Personalized Learning Approach to Broaden Participation in Computer Science and Promote Computational