., 1986, Two courses of expertise in H. Stevenson, J. Azuma & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan, New York, W. H. Freeman & Co., pp. 262-272. 6. Schwartz, D.L., Bransford, J.D., & Sears, D., 2005, Innovation and efficiency in learning and transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective, Mahwah, Erlbaum, pp. 1-51. 7. Rayne et al., 2006, “The development of adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics,” Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 165-173. 8. Martin, T, Rivale, S. and Diller, K.R., 2007, “Comparison of student learning for challenge based and traditional instruction in Biomedical Engineering,” Annals of
on our observation of students and teams during the semester and on confidentialpeer evaluations that are completed by each student at the end of the semester. The peer evalua-tions allow each student to evaluate the work of his or her teammates and to comment on thefairness of the division of labor during collaborative work. With all of this mind, we shouldmention that for most students, the IAF is chosen to be unity.The grading policy described above is rather complex, and it relies heavily on the instructor’sawareness of the work ethic and “sociological health” of each of the teams. It should be men-tioned that as of the spring 1999 semester, we are only in the third semester of teaching Interac-tive Dynamics. Thus, it has not been taught
interdisciplinary study through integrating her previous work in mathematics andaccounting with marketing. She continues to search for ways to get both faculty and students out of their “functionalsilos.” Her other research interests include social responsibility in business, ethics, retail atmosphere, retailmanagement, and the use of technology to enhance learning.DARRELL W. DONAHUE Page 4.338.12Dr. Darrell W. Donahue has been at the University of Maine as an assistant professor for four years. He teaches avariety of classes including Food Process Design and Engineering, Statistical Process Control, and ComputerSimulation of Processes
significant improvements in DCI scores. Addressing student concerns about the broadcast method of delivery directly bydiscussing literature, the “The No Significant Difference Phenomenon” (reference 11),and grade results from previous semesters early in the class may be comforting tostudents. But, it does not help them maintain classroom discipline throughout thesemester. Similarly, an orientation to the importance of the study of dynamics over thefour millennia beginning with Hammurabi’s code and ending with contemporaryengineering failures caused by dynamic conditions from recent newspaper articles mayaddress the ABET program outcomes f (ethical responsibility), h (societal context), and j(contemporary issues)18, but does not engage
, minds-on”approach through in-class cooperative problem solving, experiments and demonstrations,computer exercises, and small-scale and semester-long projects.40 Also, Hamilton et al.describe the successes and challenges of starting an engineering college at the NationalMilitary Academy of Afghanistan.41 They highlight the use of face-to-face and distancementoring, cultural and ethical challenges, faculty development, providing resources andequipment, and ensuring the continuity and sustainability of programs. Finally, thereader may want to consult the article by Rugarcia et al. on methods to establish a culturefor a research university that maintains a strong engineering education emphasis. 42It must be noted that there are unique issues
) 31.6 (12) 68.4 (26) Ethics 49.0 (24) 51.0 (25) 12.5 (3) 87.5 (21) CAM 46.9 (23) 53.1 (26) 42.9 (9) 57.1 (12) Descrip. Geo. 54.2 (26) 45.8 (22) 30.8 (8) 69.2 (18) Desktop Pub. 28.6 (14) 71.4 (35) 71.4 (10) 28.6 (4) Website Dev. 31.9 (15) 68.1 (32) 68.8 (11) 31.3 (5) Animation 58.3 (28) 41.7 (20) 28.6 (8) 71.4 (20) Note: Maximum percentage for each subject was 100%. Note: % is percentage of responses, (n) is the total of responses for each category and question. Note: * indicates a
ups; ≠ knowledge and skills in the fundamentals of engineering practice; ≠ knowledge of selected professional-level skills commensurate with students’ future field and/or area of specialization; ≠ a strong oral and written communication skills; ≠ a focus on design issues involving life–cycle economics, environmental impact, sustainable development maintainability, applicable standards and ad hoc concerns; ≠ an awareness of business practices in the Region and elsewhere; ≠ an understanding of nontechnical forces that affect engineering decision-making; ≠ a perception of social, ethical, and political responsibilities; ≠ an awareness of the evolution of human civilization in general, with an emphasis on
solving problems within their field of study; 3. have the ability to gather and interpret relevant data (usually within their field of study)to inform judgments that include reflection on relevant social, scientific or ethical issues; 4. can communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions to both specialist andnonspecialist audiences; 5. have developed those learning skills that are necessary for them to continue toundertake further study with a high degree of autonomy.” In 2005 the EU Commission introduced the EQF-LLL / European QualificationsFramework for Lifelong Learning, to provide a common reference to facilitate therecognition and the transferability of qualifications, based mainly on knowledge, skills and
AC 2010-371: USING A LIVING-BUILDING LABORATORY (BUILDING AS ALABORATORY) AS A THERMODYNAMICS PROJECT IN THE ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY CURRICULUMJason Durfee, Eastern Washington University JASON DURFEE received his BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University. He holds a Professional Engineer certification. Prior to teaching at Eastern Washington University he was a military pilot, an engineering instructor at West Point and an airline pilot. His interests include aerospace, aviation, professional ethics and piano technology.Hani Saad, Eastern Washington University Dr. Saad received his high school education in Lebanon, his native country. He received his BS and MS degrees
discussed students’ tool use skills in the Engineering 112 class and during design class thefollowing semester in order to identify students who need additional instruction or furtherexplanation of how tool use and developing an effective design process are mutually dependent.VII. ConclusionWe are moving forward in our efforts to develop a design program that utilizes design and buildstrategies as well as cognitive processes to teach design. As the design sequence rolls out, weare teaching ethics and values, aesthetics, engineering communications and sustainability in fourcontexts (environmental, social / cultural, economic, and technical).Since the James Madison University School of Engineering is new (we have sophomores thisyear), our desire to
toexplore process optimization. These variables include the sheet resistivity of the conductiveoxide layers coating the glass slides, the thickness of the TiO2 layer, the concentration and soaktime for the dye agent, and the thickness of the carbon layer. Figure 3. Cross-section of TiO2 nanocrystalline solar cell.Course StructureA three-credit eleven-week (within Drexel’s quarter system) laboratory- and project-basedcourse was developed. Fifteen hours are devoted to laboratory work and fifteen hours to lectureson nano-processes that are the basis of the lab work, Six Sigma topics, ethics and sustainability,and nano entrepreneurship. Guest lecturers are planned for the classroom sessions
Computing II 77.8% Operating Systems 72.2% Data Structures 66.7% Algorithms 61.1% Programming Languages 50.0% Introduction to Software Engineering 33.3% Software Ethics 33.3% Computer Architecture 27.8% Computer Organization & Assembly Language 22.2% Database Systems 22.2
on par with that of a high school athletic coach. • In addition to their project work, students also receive some specialized HSE training which can include topics in applied workforce skills such as leadership, communication, entrepreneurship, and ethics, and does include basic engineering fundamentals such as the design process and project management. • Team members make formal presentations at undergraduate research expositions, and they conduct project-based interactive sessions at middle and elementary schools within their local school districts. Using these latter activities as a starting point, the Enterprise model is being introduced into K-8 education
learning,etiquette, writing, ethics, etc. Each semester students are given multiple opportunities tohave feedback provided on their written work and speaking skills. They also practicegiving effective feedback to other students. Each week a different practicing engineerfrom industry comes for lunch and “story hour” where she or he shares importantmessages and experiences from their careers.At the end of the semester there are several culminating events: • Practice Final Design Review: where students get faculty and peer feedback in a non-graded opportunity to give their design project presentation. After being given the opportunity to use the feedback for improvement the students present their final design work and summary of
program.1. Students will be equipped to define, characterize and solve energy problems using thefundamental knowledge and tools in basic mathematical, chemical, physical, and social sciences.2. Students will be quipped to design and conduct meaningful experiments, acquire appropriatedata, analyze, and interpret those data to solve relevant energy engineering problems.3. Students will know pertinent professional, ethical, social and environmental factors in energyengineering and understand the impact of these factors relating to global energy issues.4. Students will complete the program with the ability to communicate technical energy relatedissues effectively both orally and in writing.5. Students will gain an appreciation for lifelong learning
. By making thoughtful decisions and examining their consequences, Reflecting and Acting students may enhance personal moral commitment, enrich ethical understanding, and strengthen civic participation.More broadly, these objectives are ones that our energy group identified as important skillsneeded of professionals in the energy and energy related fields. While there are still engineers,scientists and policy wonks who sit quietly in their labs and offices thinking deep thoughts, theimpact will come from those who can critically approach challenges, work with others andeffectively communicate both the nature of that challenge and its potential solutions to a widegroup of decision makers. The
todefine a product, design manufacturing, and/or service processes, and to design a system todevelop, produce, and distribute the product, based upon the project goals. Consideration is givento the economics of their solutions to enable the customers understand the cost implications. Theenvironmental impacts of the proffered solutions are considered, and the students are expected todemonstrate the sustainability of their designs. Since many ethical issues present themselves inengineering design, the students demonstrate an understanding of such issues and, as relevant totheir design example, discuss them, including conflict of interests and tradeoffs between costs andbenefits to society. The students assess the effect of their designs, proposed
accept an “AP® credit” in engineering under several conditions:(1) in lieu of an introductory engineering course; (2) as a science elective; (3) as a generalelective; or (4) not at all. AP® Calculus was the most often cited model.The following is a synopsis of the most common course characteristics of the 35 Introduction toEngineering syllabus that were reviewed found that the learning objectives included: • Design process • Problem solving • Creative thinking • Teaming • Technical and Engineering communications • Ethics • Basic computer tools • Time management • Project management • Modeling • Graphics • Apply mathematics and science knowledge • What it means to be an
MethodologyThere has been some debate in the educational community about the fact that the results ofrandomized control trials (RCT's) seem to be having little beneficial flow-on effect toeducators' practices in the classroom 17. Scriven 18 has written that, "there are many issues ofgreat importance in education ...where it is ethically and/or practically impossible to useRCT's" whilst Wolfe and Crookall 19 maintain that classically acceptable experimentalresearch, as used in the physical sciences, is impossible to duplicate in realistic educationalsituations.A problem with randomized, control trial, experimental methods is that in many situations it isnot possible for some of the method's criteria to be met. For example, it may not be possibleto randomly
). Washington DC: National Academy Press.6. Kolb, D.A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice- Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, NJ, 1984.7. Kolb, D.A. 1985. Learning Style Inventory. McBer & Co., Boston.8. Perry, W.G. 1970. Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.9. Stice. J.E. 1987. Using Kolb’s Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning. Eng. Educ., 291.10. McCarthy, B. 1987. The 4MAT System. Teaching to Learning Styles and Right/Left Mode Techniques, EXCEL, Barrington, IL.11. Svinicki, M.D. and N. M. Dixon, “The Kolb Model Modified for Classroom Activities, “Coll. Teach., vol. 35, p. 141, 1987.12
1 2 3 4 5 Skills. Demonstrates Ability to Manage Projects and 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Associated Project Documents. Exhibits Discipline Specific Skills. 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Demonstrates Ethical and Social Responsibility and 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Personal Integrity. Demonstrates Ability to Coordinate and Integrate 1 2 3 4
transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 1-51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.8. Rivale, S., Martin, T., & Diller, K. R. (March 2008). Teaching for innovation and efficiency in engineering. Paper to be presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.9. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.10. Rayne et al. (2006). The development of adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 165-173.11. Martin, T, Rivale, S. and Diller, K.R. (2007). Comparison of student learning for challenge based and traditional instruction
. Evaluated decisions or actions based on a discussed code of ethics; 4. Critically discussed the role of engineering and science in advancing and supporting global and social solutions in an economically and environmentally sustainable manner; 5. Described the jobs and activities typically performed by mechanical, electrical, petroleum, and/or chemical engineers and geoscientist in the petroleum industry.Additional specific course learning objectives focus on measurable means of assessing thinkingskills and life-long learning. The level of student attainment of the above outcomes is measuredthrough a series of formative assessments during classroom activities, written assignments andpresentations
understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. g. an ability to communicate effectively. h. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context.It has been reported that students learn material better when learning takes place in a teamcontext3. Team-based learning facilitates the students to build team working skills, enhancecommunication skills, and develop positive interdependence and accountability4. Students alsolearn the social benefits from working in a group5-6. Most of the studies on team-based learningfound in the open literature are related to in a classroom-setting or in a multi-disciplinary teamenvironment within a single university.Persistent
Wright, Brigham Young University Geoff Wright is a Professor of Technology and Engineering Education at Brigham Young University. His scholarship centers on programming, multimedia pedagogy, and technological literacy. He has published and presented on these and many other technology and engineering related topics.Ronald Terry, Brigham Young University Ron is a Professor of Technology and Engineering Education at Brigham Young University. His scholarship centers on pedagogy, student learning, technology literacy, and engineering ethics and has presented/published numerous articles in engineering education
and interpret data (ABET outcome b). In particular, you will be expected to: 5 i. Interpret power usage and energy consumption data for the Atheneum building. ii. Design and execute and necessary experiments to confirm or verify analytical findings related to the building analysis. 2. The ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (ABET outcome c). i. Design and analyze alternate cooling systems for the Atheneum building. ii
.BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATIONWILLIAM JORDAN is Professor and Program Chair of Mechanical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. Hehas B.S. and M.S. degrees in Metallurgical Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines. He has an M.A. degree Page 10.226.14in Theology from Denver Seminary. His Ph.D. was in mechanics and materials engineering from Texas A & MUniversity. He teaches materials oriented courses and his main research area deals with the mechanical behavior ofcomposite materials. He also writes and does research in the areas of engineering ethics and engineering education. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for