Conference Session

Capstone Design II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James J. Pembridge, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

the work habits and personalities of theirstudents (48%) and put a lot of effort to get to know their students personally (59%). Within theworkplace environment, Kram noted that young managers that had been supported by mentorsthrough friendship frequently had informal exchanges with their mentors. Similarly, relatedresults from this capstone survey 12 have shown that the interactions between capstone facultyand their students are frequent and often times occur outside of the classroom. This indicates thatwithin the capstone course faculty go beyond the simple lecturer role and actively seek to buildrelationships with their students in an effort to advance their career and psychosocialdevelopment. One area that was not as well described by

Conference Session

Knowing Our Students III

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Guili Zhang, University of Florida; YoungKyoung Min, University of Florida; Matthew Ohland, Clemson University; Timothy Anderson, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

(GPA) in student decisions to remain in or leaveengineering is studied by comparing and contrasting the GPA distributions of engineeringstudents who withdrew from the university or changed majors from engineering (leavers) tothose of students who graduated in engineering (stayers). Student record data for 39,240engineering students at the nine SUCCEED universities from 1987 to 2002 are used to computethe distributions, determine GPA differences between the two groups of students, identify thetrends of each distribution, and study the difference between them over time. The cumulativeGPAs of leavers and stayers are compared after completion of the same number of semesters.The population includes first-time-in-college undergraduate students who

Conference Session

Integration of Engineering and Other Disciplines (Including Liberal Arts)

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine Hennessey Wikoff, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Cynthia Wise Barnicki, Milwaukee School of Engineering; James R. Kieselburg II, Grohmann Museum at Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Multidisciplinary Engineering

—amechanical engineering professor, a liberal arts professor, and an art museum director—bringtruly multidisciplinary perspectives to the STEAM challenge of coherently integrating art andengineering education. The paper describes a unique relationship that has developed betweenone university’s engineering curricula and the collection of an art museum on its campus. Thepaper presents a longitudinal study of engineering students at this institution who engaged withart as part of their curriculum at both the freshman and junior levels.Among our findings: • Students liked the flexibility and freedom, the self-guided discovery that using art as a starting point afforded. No students were put off by the art. • The decision to integrate art

Conference Session

Modeling Student Data

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gillian Nicholls, University of Pittsburgh; Harvey Wolfe, University of Pittsburgh; Mary Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry Shuman, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

junior high school through college is of vital importanceto the field of engineering education. Producing a sufficient number of engineering graduatesdepends directly upon the number and quality of students that enter college and selectengineering as a major. Students that are lost to engineering by dropping out of high school;choosing not to pursue a college degree; dropping out of college; or switching out of engineeringrepresent “leaks” from the engineering education pipeline. Some of these students would nothave ultimately earned an engineering degree due to greater interest in other fields of study, butothers might have persisted to graduation with greater preparation, encouragement, andengagement. This study examines the factors that

Conference Session

Student Learning Assessment Methods

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lisa Jo Elliott, Pennsylvania State University, Erie; Faisal Aqlan, Pennsylvania State University, Erie; Richard Zhao, Pennsylvania State University, Erie; Morgan Scott Janney, Pennsylvania State University, Erie

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

by U.S. Senators and Represen- tatives. Aqlan is a member of ASEE, ASQ, SME, and IEOM. He is also a senior member of IISE and has served as president of IISE Logistics and Supply Chain Division, co-founder of IISE Modeling and Simulation Division, director of IISE Young Professionals Group, founder and faculty advisor of IISE Behrend Chapter, faculty chair of IISE Northeast Conference, and track chair in IISE Annual Conference. He currently serves as IISE Vice President of Student Development and holds a seat on IISE Board of Trustees. He also serves on IISE Technical Operations Board and leads IISE Cup initiative, which is an international competition to recognize organizations for innovative and effective

Conference Session

Track: Collegiate Technical Session 12

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Michael Scott Sheppard Jr., Arizona State University; Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Collegiate, Diversity

Member.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Dr. Samantha R. Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor within The Polytechnic School, one of six schools in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She is a mixed-methods researcher with focus on the preparation and pathways of engineering students. Her specific research interests include engineering student persistence and career decision-making, early career engineering practice, faculty pedagogical risk-taking, and entrepreneurial mindset. She completed her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering at Northeastern University and her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Prior to ASU, she worked as an engineer at A

Collection

1999 Annual Conference

Authors

W. F. Walker; S. MacGuire; L. D. Benefield; Glennelle Halpin; Gerald Halpin

Session 2353 An Evaluation of an Integrated Pre-Engineering Program: Results From the Freshman Year and Beyond Glennelle Halpin, Gerald Halpin, Larry D. Benefield, William F. Walker, Susanne MacGuire Auburn UniversityAbstractIn the fall of 1996, faculty in engineering, mathematics, and physics departments at AuburnUniversity launched an experimental pre-engineering program. The 2-year program consists of ateam-taught sequence of mathematics, engineering, and physics courses that have been integratedso as to enable pre-engineering students to grasp

Collection

1999 Annual Conference

Authors

Glennelle Halpin; Gerald Halpin; L. D. Benefield; William Walker; S. MacGuire

Session 2353 An Evaluation of an Integrated Pre-Engineering Program: Results From the Freshman Year and Beyond Glennelle Halpin, Gerald Halpin, Larry D. Benefield, William F. Walker, Susanne MacGuire Auburn UniversityAbstractIn the fall of 1996, faculty in engineering, mathematics, and physics departments at AuburnUniversity launched an experimental pre-engineering program. The 2-year program consists of ateam-taught sequence of mathematics, engineering, and physics courses that have been integratedso as to enable pre-engineering students to grasp

Conference Session

Understanding Our Students

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joachim Walther, University of Georgia; Nicki Wendy Sochacka, University of Georgia; Nadia N. Kellam, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. As a later individual exercise, the student were asked to compile a written account of one of their learning experiences and analyze it in terms of their learning and formulate decisions for future, similar situations for an example of a useful structure for the analysis see: 32.Thematic analysis of student reflections in the focus groupsThe focus groups in the context of the study were digitally recorded and transcribed for thesubsequent analysis using the qualitative data software NVivo8. The following presents an earlythematic analysis of the focus group transcripts. The presentation in the context of this paperserves two purposes: (i) to explicate and explore some of the categories of emotional indicatorsthrough students

Collection

1998 Annual Conference

Authors

Sherra E. Kerns; Robert T. Nash; David V. Kerns

Florida State University.SHERRA E. KERNS. Dr. Kerns is Professor and Chair of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, andProfessor of Management of Technology at Vanderbilt University. She is a Fellow of the IEEE and has been active inABET 2000 accreditation development. She recently completed a term as President of the National ElectricalEngineering Department Heads Association. She has also served on the faculties of Auburn and NC State University.ROBERT T. NASH. Dr. Nash is Associate Professor of Management of Technology and Electrical Engineering. Hecurrently serves as Director of Graduate Studies for the Management of Technology Program and advises a portion ofthe undergraduate MT students. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE

Conference Session

TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

PoliciesKindness in teaching can begin when a faculty member considers the rules for the class,articulated on the syllabus. Being clear about the expectations in the course by providing adetailed syllabus can be viewed as an act of kindness [59]. For example, there was no penalty instudents’ perceptions of instructor support even when fairly restrictive policies were articulated[60]. Inviting students to attend office hours, explaining policies for office hours, and extendingthe potential to meet with students beyond pre-established meeting times are all practices thatembody kindness. Inviting students to meet at self-arranged times may be particularly importantfor non-traditional students who may be juggling a complex array of work, personal health,and

Conference Session

Analysis of Feedback Loops, Understanding the Impact of a LSAMP Scholar Program, Sustainable and Equitable Infrastructure, and Indigenous Innovators

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Martha Lucia Cano-Morales, Rowan University; Michael Corey Weinberg; Eduardo Rodriguez Mejia; Juan M. Cruz, Rowan University; Gwen Lee-Thomas, Quality Measures, LLC; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Mayra S. Artiles, Arizona State University; Abimelec Mercado Rivera, Arizona State University; Stephanie G. Adams, University of Texas at Dallas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

persist in theprogram.The second hypothesis takes into consideration the factors in the student’s experience. Theliterature shows that the sense of belonging is an important factor in URM students because ithas an impact on productivity and motivation [6]. The hypothesis drawn in this case is that thereare factors in the academic system that increase the sense of belonging in URM students whichcan create a positive loop that led to persistence.Finally, we use the factors in the category of faculty-student interaction. The literature shows thatmentorship increases success in graduate students, especially if the mentor is from the sameethnicity as the URM student. Interaction with faculty members increases the students’ exposureto information, and

Conference Session

Minority Student Success

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Annita Alting, Grove School of Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York; Feridun Delale, City College of the City University of New York; Joseph Barba, City College of the City University of New York

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

invites faculty members on a regular basis toprovide descriptions of available research projects that undergraduate students can take. Grovestudents are informed on a regular basis when opportunities become available through e-mail andthe school’s web site. The selected “Bridges” students received a stipend and were required towrite a report or paper about their work and present it with a poster at an undergraduate researchsymposium. Special efforts were made to recruit women and minority students. Appendix 1provides a typical example of an undergraduate research project.2b. The summer research course for potential transfersSince 2007 the Grove School of Engineering offers a four-week summer research course forcommunity college students

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado Boulder; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Chris Swan, Tufts University; Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

.” immediately upon graduation.”Placement and Structure in Formal CurriculumThe location of ESI in the formal curriculum can send certain messages in the hidden curriculum.ABET mandates that students in accredited programs demonstrate the attainment of ESIoutcomes [18], but departments and programs have significant autonomy over how thoseoutcomes are achieved. Decisions regarding how ESI is taught are the confluence of a range offactors such as curricular space, faculty expertise and teaching load, and university generaleducation requirements. These decisions have implications beyond the course setting in whichstudents receive formal exposure to these topics. An interviewee described his perspective on theimportance of placement in the curriculum. I

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Technical Session 6: Undergraduate and Faculty Research

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maysam Nezafati, Georgia Institute of Technology; Irene Reizman, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

could benefit from research training from an EM perspective to helpthem see and prepare for a career in creative, entrepreneurial activities.Allowing students to not only learn about but also to practice EM-focused activities in the contextof their current, ongoing research, can encourage students to demonstrate the unmet need andopportunities they are addressing through their research. Supporting students and faculty in UGRexperiences through an EM lens has the potential to unleash the innovation and agency of next-level undergraduate students, who may become graduate students, and who may become our nextleaders in engineering.Future work:Our one-year follow-up survey will be distributed to this baseline cohort in the fall of 2023, whichwill

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - WIPS 3: Identity & Belonging

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Libby Flanagan, Clemson University; Madison Pollock, Clemson University ; Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University; Karen A. High, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

University of Michigan in 1985 and her M.S. in 1988 and Ph.D. in 1991 in chemical engineering both from Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Karen’s educational research emphasis includes faculty development and mentoring, graduate student development, critical thinking and communication skills, enhancing mathematical student success in Calculus (including Impact of COVID-19), and promoting women in STEM. Her technical research focuses on sustainable chemical process design, computer aided design, and multicriteria decision making. She also has extensive experience in K-12 STEM education and program evaluation and assessment. She has held a variety of administrative positions: 1) Director of STEM Faculty Development

Conference Session

Best of Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Surupa Shaw, Texas A&M University; Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

educational laboratories. ▪ Personalized Education o A satellite campus is typically unique in providing small-class sizes, a true collaborative learning environment, and an opportunity for personalized education for students. The class and campus environment creates an opportunity for faculty to engage in academic activities that can lead to developing professional relationships with students. The small class sizes allow the faculty to know their students on a more personal basis, which can lead to increasing the motivation of students. Meyer [12] conducted a literature review and survey and discovered that departments offering small class-sizes

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Retention of Undergraduate Students

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University; Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

STEM majors and careers. Some of the factors they found to influence theundergraduate experiences of women of color in STEM persistence were: STEM enrichmentprograms, interactions with peers and faculty, academic sense of self, and personal agency anddrive7. Edzie developed a 15-question survey instrument based on the Motivated StudentLearning Questionnaire8, 9, and additional qualitative research findings. This instrument was usedto gather undergraduate student data regarding student self-efficacy as compared to pre-collegiate factors potentially contributing to STEM persistence. Although Edzie’s work wasconducted at a Midwestern university, amongst a population of predominately white students, thesurvey includes probing questions relevant

Conference Session

Undergraduate Retention Activities

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Karan Watson; John Weese

increase is higher forwomen than for men. A linear regression analysis of the data for 1998 to 2003 yieldsretention rate equations of: %RMen = 67.6 + 0.65(Year – 1998), %RWomen = 62.4 + 1.29(Year – 1998).These equations predict that the retention rate for women will match that for men in2006 and that the retention rate for women will surpass the rate for men in 2007.Cohort six-year graduation rates for FTIC students in the College of Engineering for theyears 1996-2002, 1997-2003, and 1998-2004 reveal an average 50.1% for women and48.6% for men.As reported in [9], Texas A&M has taken decisive action to address diversity throughvigorous recruitment of students and the addition of faculty from

Conference Session

Research in Multidisciplinary Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carol Barry, University of Massachusetts-Lowell; Jacqueline Isaacs, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

in the Center’s laboratories (i.e., early June to mid August). Students, asindividuals or in collaboration with other undergraduates, conducted research under the guidanceof their faculty advisors, other faculty, graduate students, and post-doctoral researchers. In thisprogram, students with diverse technical backgrounds gained skills in electron and atomic forcemicroscopy; chemical synthesis; MEMS and NEMS fabrication; dip pen nanolithography;template-guided assembly and transfer of polymers and nanoparticles; high rate polymerprocessing; assessing the impact of nanoparticles on the environment; and exploring economicand ethical issues associated with nanomanufacturing. The participants presented the results oftheir research at the end of

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Strategies Beyond the Classroom to Tackle Gender Issues

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine G Nelson, Arizona State University; Susan Shapcott, University of Bath ; Jenefer Husman, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

stand out that affected your choice to pursue engineering? This program? 18. Do you think being a woman will help your hinder your career as an engineer? Why? 19. Are male and female engineers equally rewarded for the same work?” 20. Do you think there are preconceived expectations of your performance because you are a woman? If yes, can you think of an example? 21. Do you feel you have to prove yourself as a woman? 22. Do you think female students are taken less seriously? 23. Do you feel like you’re going to be equally compensated? 24. As a female, do you feel that it hurts you’re chances of being an engineering/having an engineering future? 25. Do you plan on going to graduate school, working in

Conference Session

Innovative K-12 Engineering Programs

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dewey Spangler, Virginia Tech; Olga Pierrakos, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

The first-third of GSEN focuses on the engineering profession and quantitative methods.The last two-thirds of GSEN focuses on the instruction of statics of rigid bodies using vectoralgebra and calculus. University statics courses have traditionally been used to increase attritionin engineering programs. Often, students who complete such courses do not develop a properfoundation for additional engineering coursework. Many have to repeat this course or take it at alocal community college that offers an atmosphere more conducive to learning. Some universitystudents, frustrated with the pace and lack of personal attention, become disillusioned withengineering and pursue other professions. Providing the opportunity of in-depth engineeringeducation

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

the Idea of a University [1]. In those discourses, he argued thatinteractions between students outside of the classroom are as important for learning as theclassroom. It is in the discussions they have that learning is accomplished. Newman was notreferring to engineering per se, but to mixed groups of students and he was concerned withlearning for life. The 1998 MIT task force report defined a community as a “…students,faculty members, staff and alumni who have come together on campus for the commonpurposes of developing the qualities that define an educated person” [27]. Such communitieshave the goal not only of learning but of helping the student to learn about himself/herself. Itshould be noted that Tacaks and Chambliss found that not all

Conference Session

The Best of First Year Programs: Best Paper Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cory Brozina, Youngstown State University; Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

tracked for five semestersbeyond.Foundationally, this engineering major discernment study is theoretically founded in SocialCognitive Career Theory (SCCT) to consider students decisions14-15. SCCT is used to evaluate thegoals, outcomes expectations, and self-efficacy beliefs14. An engineering education based studyon engineering major discernment used SCCT by VanDeGrift and Lao reported that courseprojects, faculty advisory interactions, and other laboratory experiences were influential inengineering major selection. The current study expects to reveal that other targeted courseexperiences would likewise influence students16.Research Questions: 1. How effective is the engineering informed decision making module at meeting its intended goals

Conference Session

Gender and Minority Issues in K-12 Engineering

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tirupalavanam Ganesh, Arizona State University; John Thieken, Arizona State University; Monica Elser, Arizona State University; Stephen Krause, Arizona State University; Dale Baker, Arizona State University; Chell Roberts, Arizona State University; Sharon Kurpius-Robinson, Arizona State University; James Middleton, Arizona State University; Jay Golden, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

first of thesefocused on eliciting students’ notions of current career goals that were then juxtaposed againstthe multi-faceted aspects of engineering student graduates (females and underrepresentedpopulations). The second of these were facilitated by project directors and were featured on thedifferent Engineering fields. Students and parents explored Engineering Go For It!: Make aDifference, Change the World10 with an interactive presentation from the facilitators. Theexperience started with a review of images from the “Engineering Is…” sections (pp. 4-9) of thepublication that was followed by small group discussions with participants and family members

Conference Session

Recruitment & Retention of Women I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lois Calian Trautvetter, Northwestern University; Rose M. Marra, University of Missouri, Columbia; Lisa R. Lattuca, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Katie L. Piacentini, University of Missouri - Columbia; David B. Knight, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

develop mentoring relationships. Summerbridge programs can provide an effective method to reduce college readiness gap betweenincoming students9, while another study10 reports that institutions that were high producers offemale and underrepresented degree recipients also offered summer bridge programs. Since the dimension of organizational context can be integral to the learning, recruitment,and retention of female and underrepresented students and to the recruitment and retention offemale and underrepresented faculty members in engineering, it is the main focus of this researchpaper. The guiding questions for this inquiry are: Page 22.1185.4

Conference Session

FPD VI: Presenting "All the Best" of the First-year Programs Division

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lorelle A. Meadows, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Elizabeth S. Hildinger, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

engineering programs can force students to narrowtheir career choices prematurely, negatively influencing student retention. In addition, severalstudies cite the positive influence of “engaging” learning experiences on student educationalexperiences14,15. These engaging activities include active learning, the conveyance of excitementand enthusiasm for a subject by faculty, cohort development and direct student-facultyinteractions.Finally, it is important to recognize that retention to graduation is only a single measure ofsuccess. For the measurement of a truly successful engineer, we should also examine theperformance and practical experiences that have been gained in and around the educationalsetting. May and Chubin10 provide a detailed overview of

Conference Session

Best of Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Trowbridge, Arizona State University; Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

contributed to the development of an interdisciplinary grand challenges focused course and introduction to engineering course in both in-person and online (MOOC) formats at ASU. She is also actively involved in the ASU Kern project and Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), focused on students’ development of entrepreneurial mindset. Amy received the national 2019 KEEN Rising Star award from KEEN for her efforts in encouraging students in developing an entrepreneurial mindset. She is also a member of the current interim Executive Committee for the international GCSP Network, and mentors schools to develop GCSPs as part of the GCSP New Programs committee.Dr. Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University Dr. Haolin Zhu

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Endeavors: Engineering, Art and Society

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Katherine Hennessey Wikoff, Milwaukee School of Engineering; James R. Kieselburg, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Margaret T. Dwyer, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Candela Marini, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

approaches in problem-solving and communication of ideas.IntroductionThis paper discusses an ongoing, successful effort to create a culture of art at a STEM-centereduniversity, not only within the engineering curriculum but also throughout campus life and itsphysical spaces.In what follows, we will offer an overview of the educational model of our university and thequestions and concerns we seek to address. We then offer detailed information of three differentlines of inquiry we have pursued to gather data on the current culture and mindset guidingpedagogical and career decisions: a 2013-14 longitudinal study which examined four cohorts ofhonors students, a 2019 focus group study, and a 2021 student/faculty survey. The results presenta fairly

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peilin Fu, National University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

2004-2008, and a Research Associate in the Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology during 2003-2004. Dr. Fu is an Associate Editor of the Journal of Control Science and Engineering, and has been served as the International Program Committee Member and Organizer of several international conferences and workshops. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Trifecta of Engagement in an Online Engineering Management CourseAbstractThis paper focuses on how to engage students in an online environment. The Trifecta ofEngagement framework is introduced. In order for students to be fully engaged in