Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Muhammad Dawood, New Mexico State University; Karen Trujillo, New Mexico State University; Patti Wojahn, New Mexico State University; Melissa J. Guynn, New Mexico State University; Luis Manuel Rangel Jr.; S. M. Yahea Mahbub, New Mexico State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

the Southwest embarked on a study of how the introduction ofmetacognition and strategies on “learning how to learn” to engineering students could impacttheir performance in class. Our preliminary data indicates that 75% of freshmen, 50% ofsophomores, and 35% of juniors do not routinely adopt effective study strategies. Our NSF-funded research project focuses on freshman students enrolled in Engineering 100, Introductionto Engineering, which is part of the innovative First-year “Engineering Experience” program.Along with improving instruments to assess metacognitive thinking, we are developingminimally-intrusive interventions including a workshop, handouts, and reflective writingdesigned to improve students’ metacognitive awareness (their

Conference Session

Enhancing K-12 Mathematics Education with Engineering

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Moss, Clemson University; Dorothy Moss, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Three- Exploring Prisms Exploring Exploring Translations, Transformations Exploring Rotations Dimensional Pyramids Cylinders, Cones, Reflections, and on the Number Transformations Shapes Students develop a and Spheres Rotations Line

Conference Session

Graduate Education

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba; Patricia Kristine Sheridan, University of Toronto; Liz A. Kuley, University of Saskatchewan; Robyn Paul, University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

with high-levelreflection/qualitative questions and low-level reflection/quantitative questions. The second phasewill be a narrative analysis of individuals’ stories derived through semi-structured interviewsusing a protocol constructed from the analyses of the survey data. The survey was built usingMcAlpine and colleagues’ identity-trajectory framework3-5, which accounts for theinterconnectivity of the intellectual, institutional, and networking influences on a student’sidentity. The findings from these two phases will be used to describe the diversity of identities ofstudents studying EngEd in Canada, and to ascertain challenges and opportunities that exist forthem in this developing and unfettered field1.As a function of the overall study

Conference Session

Course Transformation in ECE

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh; Mohan Wang, University of Pittsburgh; Mohamed A. S. Zaghloul, University of Pittsburgh; Spencer Mark Sullivan; Kevin Chen

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

students (Edstrom et al., 2007; Prince & Felder,2006). The goal is for students to apply, integrate, and/or synthesize their knowledge, includingknowledge from previous coursework, in completing the project, which reflects the complexityencountered in an engineering environment (Sheppard et al., 2009; Prince & Felder, 2006;Edstrom et al., 2007). An inductive approach tends to drive or motivate the need for the contentor theory, which may be difficult or otherwise seem of minimal use until students beginstruggling with a real challenge (Prince & Felder, 2007). Project based learning (PBL) is a keypedagogical model that can address and improve transfer of knowledge from one context toanother, retention of information, and student

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Teams and Teamwork

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jean Carlos Batista Abreu, Elizabethtown College; Brenda Read-Daily, Elizabethtown College

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

reflections. The GallupStrengthsFinder Inventory has been previously implemented in engineering classrooms[6], [7], [8]. However, this study is the first to look at students’ perceptions of how thistool impacts their teamwork. Also, this paper addresses how students’ perceptions andattitudes concerning teamwork change as a result of working on a semester-long projectwith the same team.ContextThe activities described in this paper were implemented during one semester of anIntroduction to Engineering course at Elizabethtown College. The department offersABET-accredited BS degrees in engineering and computer engineering. Both majors arerequired to take Introduction to Engineering. The course was comprised of 46 studentsin two sections, 22 in Section A

Conference Session

Creating Equity Through Structure and Pedagogy

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chelsea Nneka Onyeador, Stanford University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Gloriana Trujillo, Stanford University; Carol B. Muller, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

reflection and evaluation data. Our analysis andrecommendations focus on inclusivity, which is the ability of students of all backgrounds toengage meaningfully with the course. Since the goal of such courses is to attract students with arange of experiences and backgrounds, inclusivity in every course component is critical.I. IntroductionIt is well documented that today’s engineering students, faculty, and practitioners in the U.S. donot represent the demographic profile of the national population [6]. While a strong argument infavor of diversity based on social and demographic group membership can be made on thegrounds of fairness, there is another, perhaps more compelling argument to be made. William A.Wulf captures that argument when he states

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Self Efficacy

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Desen Sevi Özkan, Virginia Tech; Cherie D. Edwards, Virginia Tech; Sreyoshi Bhaduri, Virginia Tech; Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

the specific characteristics of each of Gee’s four categoriesof identity. Participant reflection statements were coded using the same approach. Onceparticipant drawings and reflection statements were coded, we examined the codes andcategories to identify emergent themes.Keywords: arts-based research, sketching, first-year engineering, spatial visualization, identity,qualitative methods, exploratoryIntroductionSketching as a practice can be applied in various ways. The practice itself changes based on itsintended purpose or application. For this paper, we borrow the definition for the term sketchingfrom Song and Agogino, who describe it “broadly to include all early-stage forms of graphicalrepresentations of design, including rough freehand

Conference Session

Making, Hacking, and Extracurricular Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shaunna Fultz Smith, Texas State University; Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University; Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University; Vedaraman Sriraman, Texas State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

by doing” constuctionist pedagogies (Papert & Harel,1991) and reflective formative assessment strategies that emphasized process in addition to finalartifact products; and 4) on-going discussion of diverse purposes for making, including directapplication of content standards and connections, personally meaningful creation and expression,and creative experimentation and problem-solving.The course focused on the integration of makerspace themes into a variety of K-12 educationalsettings and included scaffolded activities covering non-digital and digital techniques for thefollowing topics: subtractive manufacturing, textiles, additive manufacturing, and simpleelectronics. The majority of the activities took place in the classroom makerspace

Conference Session

Flipped Electrical and Computer Engineering Classrooms 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rami Jubrail Haddad, Georgia Southern University; Youakim Al Kalaani P.E., Georgia Southern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

motivate theengineering students to actively learn and develop their well-needed self-reflection and self-judgment skills. This approach will help maximize the effectiveness of the homeworkcomponent and empower the students to learn from their own mistakes. In this model, students’grades are based on their ability to clearly identify their misconceptions, make corrections, andprovide a clear justification for how they graded their homework problems. In addition, thismodel is sought to not only discourage plagiarism but also to provide an accurate indicator of theperformance of every student in class. To validate our findings, we conducted both quantitativeand qualitative assessments taking into consideration all the pertinent parameters involved

Conference Session

Exploring Graduate Student Experiences

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Quintana M. Clark, Purdue University, West Lafayette Indiana; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

(ELT) has been suggested in The Art of Changing the Brain: Enriching Teachingby Exploring the Biology of Learning7. With respect to the brain’s structure and the learningcycles, Concrete Experiences (CE) comes through the sensory cortex located at the back of thebrain, Reflective Observation (RO) involves the temporal integration cortex at the bottom of thebrain, Abstract Conceptualization (AC) happens in the frontal integrative cortex of the brain, andActive Experimentation (AE) takes place in the motor portion of the brain. An illustration of alearning cycle and their correlation to regions of the cerebral cortex is shown in Figure 1. Thefour phases of the learning cycle are not necessarily sequential as shown. The learning cycle maybegin in

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 2: Design in the First Year: Challenges and Successes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathleen A Harper, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

reviewTeams were asked to identify aspects of their draft that were better than those they read, as wellas describe modifications that they would make to their report based upon what they saw fromtheir classmates. The complete instructions of the team portion of the exercise are Part 2 of theassignment in the appendix. The reflection was turned in, along with the feedback they providedto their classmates. Credit for both parts of the assignment was essentially effort-based. Teamsthen received the peer feedback and began working on the subsequent first-half draft of thereport. This draft included the two sections that were the subject of the peer review, plus a few

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Assessment in the First Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University; Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University; Matthew K. Miller, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

industrial engineering and engineering education have helped him develop innovative ways to deliver engineering curriculum for freshman engineers and talented high school students interested in engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Extended Exam Wrappers: A Comparison of Approaches in a Learning Strategies CourseAbstractThis Complete Evidence-Based Practice paper explores the use of exam wrappers in alearning strategies course designed for first-year engineering students in the General EngineeringLearning Community (GELC) at Clemson University. Exam wrappers are most commonly usedas tools to facilitate the process of self-evaluation as students reflect on

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sohum A. Sohoni, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Kerri S. Kearney, Oklahoma State University; Rebecca L. Damron, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

Optimization Students use complete PLP A C Compiler for PLP Add to the C Compiler for platform in embedded using GNU tools. PLP; perform multi-pass system applications optimizations.Figure 1: Courses that can use PLP. Ample course materials are available for a sophomore/juniorcourse on microprocessors, and for a computer architecture course. Materials are being developed for theother courses.On the hardware side, PLP is a System on a Chip design written in Verilog that can besynthesized on contemporary FPGA boards, with accompanying tools reflecting a contemporaryCPU architecture. All hardware components of PLP are

Conference Session

Pedagogy and Assessment in ECE

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gordon Skelton, Jackson State University; Wei Zheng, Jackson State University; HuiRu Shih, Jackson State University; Evelyn Leggette, Jackson State University; Tzusheng Pei, Jackson State University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

ENGINEERINGIntroductionThe research reported in this paper reflects an effort to enhance student self-awareness and toself-regulate their learning in a Special Topics Course taught during the fall semester at JacksonState University. The students were introduced to the concepts of software engineering,systems engineering and problem solving in support of a semester level project based upon smallteam dynamics. Emphasis was placed on monitoring the students’ feedback on a number ofissues related to self-regulated learning concepts of motivation, study techniques, self awarenessand metacognition. The primary purpose of the research was to attempt to understand andmentor junior and senior level students in computer engineering in regard to their learning andstudy

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

S. Natasha Beretvas; John Pearce, University of Texas at Austin; Kathy Schmidt, The University of Texas at Austin

Creating an environment for learning Helping students become autonomous, self-regulated learners Reflecting on and evaluating their teaching5.With these strategies in mind, ELVIS was employed during lectures for real-time demonstrationsof circuit performance in a second electronics class, EE 338K (a junior/senior level elective with20 students) in the College of Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin in the summer2003 term. The experienced faculty member (JP) was aware of the perplexing nature of thetopics for many students and he wanted to integrate ELVIS into his lectures in order to helpstudents visualize concepts that are more traditionally taught using only mathematical formulasand to give them a context for theoretical

Conference Session

Experiences in Engineering Community Engagement

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marybeth Lima, Louisiana State University

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

engagement indicators, student retention, and percentage of alumni who are active incommunity engagement, and (3) discuss major lessons learned during the course of 15 years as acommunity engaged faculty member.IntroductionService-learning is defined as “a credit-bearing, educational experience in which studentsparticipate in an organized service activity that meets identified community needs and reflect onthe service activity in such a way as to gain further understanding of course content, a broaderappreciation of the discipline, and an enhanced sense of civic responsibility.” (Bringle andHatcher, 1995). Service-learning in higher education was pioneered by Ernest Boyer (1990,1996) and by a number of others (Harkavay, 2004; Eyler and Giles, 1999

Collection

1998 Annual Conference

Authors

Alice Agogino; Ann McKenna

the other teams and the class discussed the merits and drawbacks of each. The majority of theresponsibility for analyzing the designs rested with the students in an effort to develop autonomy.As described in the SKI framework, autonomous learning was facilitated by having the studentsserve as social supports for each other through sharing design ideas, providing feedback, andcritiquing each other’s designs2.Self-reflection was also achieved through the sharing of designs and ideas. Since the activity wasstructured in a collaborative learning environment, individual student self-reflection becamevoiced through the group discourse. Therefore, the students’ thinking became ‘visible’throughout the class demonstrations and discussions. As

Conference Session

Nanotechnology/RFID

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patrick Anderson, CET; Ghassan T. Ibrahim, Bloomsburg University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

information. Page 22.1021.5 Figure 5, Tags sensitivity testTag Performance Analysis The performance of the ALN-9640 was analyzed to determine its sensitivity under twooperating conditions. The sensitivity test was repeated with the ALN-9640 located at differentdistances from the reader antenna. Figure 6 shows the degradation of the sensitivity when the tagwas placed further away from the reader antenna, which is a typical propagation characteristic ofRF signal. Figure 7 shows the degradation of the tag sensitivity when it was placed in anenvironment cluttered with RF signal reflecting metal cabinets and equipment (RF

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Michael Doran; Leo Denton; Dawn McKinney

vocabulary and reflective framework consistent with Maslow.Through reflection, students will anticipate and recognize how the achievement of specific goalssatisfies deeper objectives in their overall intellectual growth and self-actualization. Byparticipating in self-reflection, students will be able to carry associated self-regulated learninghabits into later courses and achieve a more active role in their learning experiences. While atfirst being an expected behavior that is prompted by the educational setting, motivated learningshould ultimately become an internalized life-habit. This approach prepares students to embarkon careers that require the practice of lifelong learning. This effort to address the motivationfactor should not disturb but

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenefer Husman, Arizona State University; Jonathan Hilpert, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne; Katrien Kraft, Arizona State University; Laura Baughman, Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne

paths.2 Ourresults provide an initial qualitative description of how teachers promote constructivist, inclusivepractices such as knowledge building and collaboration during instruction and how the use ofthese teaching techniques – such as activating student prior knowledge, engaging students inlearning activities, and promoting reflection – might relate to students use of learning strategiesand perceptions of a future career path.Theoretical FrameworkIn the fall of 2009 we began an evaluation of a professional development program at a largesouthwestern university in the United States designed to promote constructivist teachingpractices in freshman engineering classrooms. This program had the expressed purpose ofimproving engineering education

Collection

2024 South East Section Meeting

Authors

Amy Borello Gruss, Kennesaw State University ; Nicholas Anthony Clegorne

Tagged Topics

Diversity

decades, research is still in its infancy within the discipline of engineering educationwith only one research team studying VTS on engineering students. In 2017, Campbell and hiscollaborators introduced VTS to upper-level engineering students in hopes of creating morereflective engineers [14]. A comparison of essay responses before and after the VTS experienceshowed that students were indeed more reflective afterward, though the essay prompt was relatedto the art they previously viewed rather than engineering concepts [14]. They expanded upontheir work with graduate engineering students using instrumentations for insight, contextualcompetence, reflective skepticism, and interdisciplinary skills [15] and using reflective prompts[16] [17] [18

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Division Technical Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brett Tallman, University of Texas at El Paso; Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University - Bozeman; William J. Schell

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)

maintain that the ways engineers navigate thisexperience are unique, even compared to other autonomous professions [e.g. 31, 32-34]. Whileseveral scholars have explored how leadership is practiced in the engineering profession, one hasemerged as particularly useful; [12] proposed a model of three leadership orientations in theprofession: 1. Technical Mastery –leadership practiced by teaching others; 2. Collaborative Optimization – leadership practiced by gathering and influencing teams; 3. Organizational Innovation— leadership practiced by creating market solutions.These three orientations reflect the skills, behaviors, and values commonly exhibited by leadersin the engineering profession; they also provide a coherent and

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Hoffman, Quinnipiac University; Stefan C. Christov, Quinnipiac University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

motivating objective was togive students on-the-job experience with SE principles where teams of 5 to 6 students developeda simulated project. Reichlmayr briefly describes the postmortem process where teams useprocess metrics to reflect on and improve process management.Two recent papers further report the use of Agile software development methodology for courseprojects [8,14]. In one paper, the authors describe an upper-level course where students use theiterative features of Agile that allow them to repeat cycles where they “see and use tools thatthey can explain and check. [8]”. The second paper describes a capstone course motivated by thedesire for students to learn transferable skills [14]. In both cases, projects last an entire semesterwhere

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mia Minnes, University of California, San Diego; Sheena Ghanbari Serslev, University of California, San Diego ; Madison Edwards

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

University of California, San Diego sserslev@ucsd.edu Madison Edwards Chemistry and Biochemistry University of California, San Diego m4edward@ucsd.edu Abstract This study explores how industry internships, paired with scaffolded reflection, shape student attitudes and learning behaviors. Building upon the literature on student motivation, we seek to answer the following question: how do internships influence student attitudes towards their studies and their future approaches towards learning? Data at three critical points in a student

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela Minichiello, Utah State University; Ted Campbell, Utah State University; Jim Dorward, Utah State University; Sherry Marx, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

engineering calculus course taught via synchronous broadcast at a mid-size,Western, public university. The instructional innovation required first year calculus students toparticipate in an asynchronous, online discussion forum for graded credit. Data, consisting ofwritten reflections and transcribed interviews, were gathered from three STEM faculty memberswho each played a different role in the change process: a mathematics instructor implementingthe online forum within his course; an engineering faculty peer-mentor assisting with theimplementation of the online forum; and a STEM education faculty member evaluating theimplementation and observing the process of change. Situated within the interpretive researchparadigm, this study uses exploratory

Conference Session

Analysis of Effectiveness and Impacts of Graduate Programs: Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Wayne Coots, Purdue University; Sarah Knapp, Purdue University; Amelia Chesley, Purdue University; Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University; Dawn Laux, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

makes up the great bulk of what we know how to do in everyday and inprofessional life. It is what gets us through the day” (Schön, 1995). In his paper describing thisknowing-in-action, Schön suggests a concept like Dreyfus and Dreyfus, an expert who tries toteach their craft or practice must reflect on specific situations and contexts to describe how theywould approach them. It is in this manner that design knowledge is created, reflecting on thepractice and process to develop a knowledge base unique to each designer. Schön describes thisevent as either reflection-in-action or reflection-on-action.This reflection practice is crucial to design, for building knowledge and for developing a bestpractice. Reflection is also common in the

Conference Session

Continuous Improvement in Engineering Leadership Development Programs

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marnie V. Jamieson, University of Alberta; John M. Shaw

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

design courses and are evaluated as graduate attributeoutcomes integral to the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) evaluationprocesses. Continual course improvement processes require reflection on the success oflearning activities, the tools used for teaching, and alignment of learning outcomes,activities, and assessment. Peer evaluation and feedback tools can encourage studentlearning and leadership development. The method of data collection, the type of feedbackand the contextual validity of the feedback may impact students’ development of useful teambehaviours and personal strategies for working in team environments. Mixed methodsuccessive case study analysis provides insights enabling targeted improvements to learningactivities

Conference Session

Focus on Entry Experiences in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University; Lori Smolleck, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

. The course is designed to provide students with instructional methods andcurricular materials appropriate for teaching science concepts, processes and skills in theelementary grades. The course reflects best practices for the teaching of science asoutlined in the National Science Education Standards and the Pennsylvania StateStandards. Each of these reform documents emphasizes an approach to the teaching andlearning of science, which highlights scientific inquiry as a prominent feature. As such,teaching science as inquiry serves as the foundation of the course.The major goals for the course include assisting students in developing positivedispositions toward science teaching and learning, becoming familiar with the goals ofcontemporary

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bala Vignesh Sundaram, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus; Nadia Kellam, Arizona State University

participant decided on specific empatheticactions to implement in their course. We collected after-class audio reflective journaling andthree 1-hour interviews (spread evenly across the semester) as the data. We used a qualitativedata analysis approach, primarily utilizing inductive coding and thematic coding to arrive at ourfindings. Over the course of the semester, the faculty’s use of empathy in the classroomincreased. Positive feedback from the students during class and in regular student evaluations ofthe class encouraged the faculty to continue to explicitly adopt empathetic actions in this class.Our findings indicate that there are benefits of teacher empathy within engineering education.The immediate positive benefit for the faculty is an

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan; Kelley Dugan, University of Michigan; Shanna Daly, University of Michigan; Colleen Seifert, University of Michigan; Elizabeth Pollack

potential pitfalls, or things that might go wrong while addressing this problem?  How would you know if a solution to this problem was effective?Next, we present an example solution (presented in the form of a student project poster) for thesame problem and ask participants to reflect on the solution and offer critiques. Examplequestions in this portion of the interview include:  What are your first impressions about how the team addressed this problem?  What is something you think team did well with this solution?  What could the team have done differently?  Hypothetically, if the solution presented was ultimately unsuccessful, what might you assume were the key issues?After completing discussion of the first