to change the level of participation of students byincreasing expectation and so making students more responsible for their ownlearning 10, 11.A possible approach to teaching computer networks topics is to allow students tolearn using real networks. Traditionally, computer networks courses have notprovided students with hands-on access to networking equipment and software; costand implementations factors have made it difficult 12,13. However, due to increasingpopularity of vendor-based courses as components of undergraduate curricula,students now have the opportunity to study a more practical approach and henceprogram networking devices (switches, routers). Furthermore, relatively inexpensiveequipment, such as switches and routers, and
Laboratories to Have a CAD/CAM Component: Implementation Issues,” Engineering Design Graphics Journal, Vol. 60, No. 2, 1996, pp. 26-41.16 Padron, Elsa Napoles, et al., “An Introduction of Finite Element Method in the Engineering Teaching at the University of Camaguey,” Cuba, Vol. 06-13, 1996, pp. 1-5.17 Boronkay, Thomas G. and Janak Dave, “Introduction of Finite Element Methods in the Lower Division Mechanical Engineering Technology Curriculum,” Proceedings of the 1997 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Milwaukee.18 Karadelis, J.N., “A Stimulating Approach to Teaching, Learning and Assessing Finite Element Methods: A Case Study,” European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1998, pp. 91- 103.19 Earley, Ronald E., “Use
fiction places the student inanother world to examine important human conflicts, issues, questions, and desires. Second,science fiction provides a mental laboratory in which students can perform thought experimentswith new technology. Third, a science fiction course can allow engineering students to interactwith students in less technical disciplines. This cross-fertilization is often very helpful inworking through issues of technology and its interaction with the human society within which itis embedded.I. IntroductionArchibald Putt has said “technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understandwhat they do not manage and those who manage what they do not understand.” We generallysuppose engineers, the designers of technology
from the learningtask. Fourth, feedback apparently plays a minor role in actual classroom situations. Fifth,teaching students to provide their own feedback and explanation is an effective alternative.These findings suggest that instructors may be more effective if they put less effort into gradingand commenting on students’ products and more effort into structuring their courses to helpstudents learn how to assess and reflect on their state of learning themselves. Two specificpedagogical strategies are suggested. First, giving students more assignments than the instructorcould grade or comment on will provide more of the kinds of practice they need to developexpertise. Second, helping students to learn how to assess and reflect on their state
College of Engineering and the Biology Department at North Carolina A&T StateUniversity (NCA&T).One example of cross-campus sustainable collaborations is team teaching by faculty from thetwo disciplines. The mechanical engineering department faculty has recognized that researchinto new biomaterials is a significant area of emphasis for modern materials research andtherefore is an area worthy of study. In order to prepare students, the regularly scheduled courseentitled Modern Engineering Materials is being upgraded to include biomaterials. Recognizingthat the human body is an amazing machine made up of a series of macro and nano-scalesystems including biological pumps, valves, pipes, filters, wiring, as well as contents underpressure, the
. Educating the engineer of 2020 adapting engineering education to the new century. 2005; http://site.ebrary.com/lib/librarytitles/Doc?id=10091305.18. Dix A, Ormerod T, Twidale M, Sas C, Gomes da Silva PA, McKnight L. Why dab ideas are a good idea. 2006.19. Abu-Khalaf AM. Improving Thinking Skills in the Unit Operations Laboratory. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2001;17(6):593-599.20. Chrysikou EG, Weisberg RW. Following the Wrong Footsteps: Fixation Effects of Pictorial Examples in a Design Problem-Solving Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 2005;31(5):1134-1148.21. Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, Weil B. Teaching innovative design reasoning: How concept– knowledge theory
andeducation of an engineer is now compared to that of an engineering technologist and othertechnologists (e.g., in terms of math/theory in the education, in terms of ability to work hands-on,and in terms of job roles in a interdisciplinary team). Students are now better exposed totechnology-related degree options other than engineering.Second, a technology professor joined the EGR120 teaching team. The course has since beenbroken into four curriculum blocks, taught “round-robin” by four professors: an EE section, anME section, a general engineering profession and projects section, and a hands-on/laboratory(technology-professor) section. The hope is that students who are dissatisfied with engineeringwill now have a contact and familiarity elsewhere in
four-year colleges and universities and a variety of vocational andtechnical degrees utilizing state-of-the-art laboratory facilities (including drafting and CAD,machining, metallurgy, metrology, robotics and automation, and electronics).Muskegon Community College (MCC) has a new 95,000 square foot building, the HigherEducation Center (HEC), where three cooperating universities (including WMU) were to offerupper division and graduate courses. MCC was (and is) extremely interested in expanding the Page 5.301.1upper division offerings from cooperating universities to better utilize the new facility and tooffer opportunities for its students to
provides itsgraduates with enormous opportunities at home and abroad. One only has to think of themergers, joint ventures and other collaborative schemes which have appeared over thepast few years as deregulation has begun to break down national barriers and literally to"open up the world." An engineer in telecommunications must be familiar with foreignlanguages, foreign markets, the Economics of telecommunications and certain legal andcontractual aspects of the profession.In 1977, we introduced the study of two compulsory foreign languages and every studentspent 8 hours per week studying them. We now teach ten modern languages. (Arabic,Chinese, English, French, German, Japanese, Polish, Portuguese, Russian and Spanish.)Teaching French in France
Paper ID #42238Using Comics to Promote Student Interest in the Breadth and Depth of ChemicalEngineeringIra Hysi, Northeastern UniversityDr. Luke Landherr, Northeastern University Dr. Luke Landherr is a teaching professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Northeastern University, conducting research in comics and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Using Educational Comics to Promote Student Interest in the Breadth and Depth of Chemical Engineering Abstract To encourage students to pursue chemical engineering at undergraduate and
AC 2011-871: ATTRACTING K-12 STUDENTS TOWARDS ENGINEER-ING DISCIPLINES WITH PROJECT BASED LEARNING MODULESAlok K. Verma, Old Dominion University Dr. Alok K. Verma is Ray Ferrari Professor and, Director of the Lean Institute at Old Dominion Univer- sity. He also serves as the Director of the Automated Manufacturing Laboratory. Dr. Verma received his B.S. in Aeronautical Engineering from IIT Kanpur, MS in Engineering Mechanics and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from ODU. Prof. Verma is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Virginia, a certi- fied manufacturing engineer and has certifications in Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma. He has orga- nized several international conferences as General Chair, including
week fortwo hours teaching each other to answer questions that are posted in their course locker.The questions are concept-based covering the lecture material for the prior week. Graduatestudent volunteers and the the instructor serve as guides but not tutors. The primary goalsare to provide an enquiry-guided learning environment, to discourage rote learning and tomake the subject more enjoyable.1. IntroductionCollege teaching methods have gone through a revolution in recent years with the conceptof active learning shown to be the way for students to learn. There is a vast amount of edu-cation literature that has established that active participation in the class room as opposedto passive listening keeps students better motivated in the
orientation but before classes started to easenew faculty tension. Sessions were held on the three tenure criteria: research, teaching, andservice. In each session, a panel of three tenured faculty (one senior and two recently tenured)spoke about what was required for success and answered junior faculty questions. Following thethree sessions, the junior faculty had lunch with senior administrators and a discussion with theengineering dean.A particular problem in new faculty integration is bringing women into departments in whichfew or no women currently work. We started a women in engineering research network toconnect junior and senior women in all engineering departments, and thereby attain a criticalmass for effective peer-mentoring. The network
publication at the level appropriate for each target audience),the PowerPoint presentations for the topic, the teaching notes including instructions on themotivation of the topic, descriptions of active-learning exercises that can be conducted during thelecture, example quizzes, and the evaluation surveys to be completed at the end of the module. Inaddition, laboratory exercises and simulations (Flash and Java animations) are beingincorporated into the module.Examples of Knowledge and Application Module DescriptionsIn this section we offer two examples: one KM and one AM. These and other modules will beevaluated during the Spring 2010 semester in our Nanophotonics EE 459 course using methodswe have developed previously [5-6].KM: Plasmonics
-12education and cope with the rapid advancement in science and technology, the National ScienceFoundation has funded a number of research projects at dozens of universities nationwide. Oneof these projects is the Science and Technology Enhancement Program (STEP) currently beingconducted at the University of Cincinnati. Graduate and undergraduate fellows of Project STEPare placed in different secondary schools to work with math and science teachers. The mainresponsibility of a fellow is to develop and implement hands-on activities that are creative,engineering-focused, and technology-driven. Activities are incorporated into lessons,demonstrations, laboratory exercises, and field experiences. By doing these activities, studentswill experience authentic
INFORMATIONDr Nirmala Khandan holds the John Clark Professorship in the Civil Engineering Department at New Mexico StateUniversity. He received his MS and PhD degrees from Drexel University in Environmental Engineering. He hasreceived several awards for teaching and research. His current research is focused o n educational materialsdevelopment, teaching, and learning.ACKNOWLDGEMENT Page 10.330.5This work was supported in part by a grant from the Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement program ofNational Science Foundation. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
academia. The UT-Austin ASEE student chapter was established in the fall of 1996.The steps taken to establish this student chapter are described by Matsumoto et al. 1 The primarypurposes of the student chapter at UT-Austin are: · to encourage students to consider careers in academia; · to enhance the teaching and presentation skills of prospective educators; · to develop the skills needed to establish and lead a research program; · to assist students in their search for academic positions. · to encourage undergraduate students to consider graduate school. The ASEE student chapter at UT-Austin has evaluated its effectiveness in achieving theseobjectives by surveying former graduate
to enhance the learning of biomechanical principles. The goal of thispaper is to describe the course, report on our instructive experience and students’ evaluation ofthe class and suggest future teaching strategies. Twelve, two-hour weekly sessions werescheduled during the fall 2001 semester to teach this course. Based on our experience, webelieve that the integration of ADAMS into existing bioengineering courses can greatly improvestudents’ understanding of biomechanical systems, while simultaneously adding to theirengineering skills. However, the efficient use of this software requires training and regular use.We suggest that students be required to take a course similar to the Introduction to ADAMS forBioengineers course discussed in this
of the robotic platform. The initial configurationand installation being handled by the EET students made it possible for future students to utilizethe robot for learning to operate the robot and incorporate skills from other disciplines toaccomplish the 3D welding process. Projects in the future can be aimed at accomplishing thetasks laid out in the Progress and Preparation for Future Students sections.SafetyAs safety is of the utmost importance, the number one priority was to design the work cell to beas safe as possible. The Department of Health and Safety (D.H.S.) on campus was contacted totour the lab and verify the safety of the work cell and laboratory layout. Currently there are onlygeneral lab safety training courses available and
Program, at The Citadel. She holds a B.S. in Materials Science and Engineering from Rice University as well as a M.S. and Ph.D. in Materials from the University of California Santa Barbara where she studied stresses in thin films. She previously developed nanoparticle-modified glass and auto- motive coatings (at PPG Industries, Inc.), conducted Raman spectroscopy of materials under static high pressure (at Los Alamos National Lab), studied the physics of electrochromic devices (at Uppsala Uni- versity, Sweden), and taught science, math, and reading to 4-year-olds (at a Charleston preschool). Now she enjoys teaching upper-level undergraduate and graduate Materials courses and encouraging students. Her research interests
models for students thinking of attending college 1(Knight et al., 2019; Hinojosa, 2018). In addition to mentorship, SCENIC also provides high quality environmental monitoringequipment to support engineering and science learning in rural communities. This is importantbecause rural high schools often cannot afford quality laboratory equipment like universityresearchers use. While schools closer to universities might have access to these resources simplydue to the privilege of proximity, the nature of geographic isolation for much of rural Coloradomakes accessing university resources a challenge. SCENIC seeks to disrupt this inequity
might be shown mathematics laboratories, the media production facilities, and computer-assisted instruction programs. But on the way to those installations, they will pass dozens of classrooms with instructors lecturing and conducting discussions just the way they and their predecessors have been doing for decades (p. 155).Service learning is an appropriate teaching and learning approach in which the workplaceprovides a practical setting for structured problem-based learning experiences.Blumenfeld, Soloway, Marx et al. (1991) concluded that technology can play a powerful role 151in project-based learning. Technology contributes to students’ learning by enhancinginterest
the structure, in a three dimensionalmodel and through the use of add-on software and/or third party software analyze and design thestructure. As educators, how do we, or for that matter do we, bring this software to theclassroom or laboratory. It allows our students to solve complex problems and potentially makesthem more marketable. However, if all we teach is the software, who answers the question “ Dothe results make sense?” As of today and it may change in the future, the computer does nothave a professional engineering stamp and the software provider implicitly states that it shares noliability and make no guarantees concerning the use of the output from its software. Is itpossible to make tens of thousands of input entries and have no
[4]. This was found to better prepare students for lectureson new concepts, as well as give instructors more time to teach the new concept in class as theydid not need to review prerequisite knowledge with students [4]. Similarly, another study foundthat having more tutorials or example problems was helpful in engineering students'comprehension of math [12]. Other studies tested new e-learning practices and programs [5], [9-10]. They found that this style of learning was the best alternative during the COVID-19 pandemic;however, it also produced more confusion during certain laboratory activities [5], [10]. Recognizethat these studies were conducted before and during the pandemic, so newer studies may finddifferent results as online learning
[22]. Professor Courtney Pfluger has taught design related courses for over 10 years, 6 years inFirst Year Engineering design courses including developing and implementing the redesign of the first-year engineering curriculum incorporating design and problem solving through data analysis usingcomputer tools. Professor Pfluger taught unit operations laboratory courses for 3 years and seniorcapstone design for 4 years. Professor Anastasia Hauser from University of Kentucky has two years ofexperience teaching capstone design and has integrated team-based learning into both capstonecourses. Prior to teaching capstone design, Professor Hauser worked in development within thepharmaceutical and medical device industries.3.3. Site Selection and
, Advising, Facilities, and Support Staff. Most of these CI componentswere identified using ABET’s criteria. Curriculum, Faculty, and Facilities directly correspond tothe ABET criteria with the same name. Courses correspond to ABET’s Student Outcomes.Administration and Support Staff (such as lab technicians and teaching assistants of a computingprogram) correspond to ABET’s Institutional Support. Research and Advising are not mentionedin ABET’s criteria but are addressed in the literature.In addition to the list of eight 360-CI components, we identify three more critical areas toconsider in a 360-CI comprehensive plan: 1) the coverage of the 360-CI components, 2) theintegration of those components, 3) the data used and generated by the components
, pp. 253-262.2. “Real-World Experience Can Revitalize Teaching”, Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, http://www.nwrel.org/nwreport/dec98/article.html, retrieved 3/18/2009.3. Uluatam, S. S. (1992) “Civil Engineering Experience and Education”, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, Vol. 118, No. 1, January, pp. 71-76.4. “Civil Engineering Overview”, Sloan Career Cornerstone Center, www.careercornerstone.org, retrieved Feb. 3, 2009.5. Akili, W. (2006) “Case Studies in Geotechnical/Foundation Engineering: Engaging Students and Bringing the Practice into the Classroom”, Conference Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. June 18-21, Chicago, IL.6
. Her current research interests include the effect of instructional technology on student learning and performance, effective teaching strategies for new graduate student instructors, and the impact of GSI mentoring programs on the mentors and mentees.Joanna Mirecki Millunchick, University of Michigan Joanna Millunchick is Associate Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, and is affiliated with the Applied Physics Program and the Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics at the University of Michigan. Prior to joining UM in 1997, Millunchick was a Postdoctoral Fellow at Sandia National Laboratories. She received her B.S. in Physics from DePaul University in 1990, and her Ph.D. in
description and a New Teaching FormatThe ENGE1024 course description is: “Introduction to the profession and the College ofEngineering; foundation material in: problem definition, solution and presentation; design,including hands-on realization working in teams; modeling and visual representation of abstractand physical objects; scientific computation; algorithm development, computer implementationand application; documentation; ethics; professionalism”.9The course is a 2-credit course and all engineering freshmen are required to pass the course witha C- or better grade. Traditionally, this course was taught by EngE faculty using two 50-minlessons every week. In spring 2005, the first two authors took the lead in piloting a new formatinvolving one 50
Paper ID #16713System Engineering Education for All Engineers - A Capstone Design Ap-proachDr. Armand Joseph Chaput, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics University ofTexas at Austin Dr. Armand J. Chaput is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics at the University of Texas (UT) at Austin and Director of the Air System Laboratory. He teaches Aircraft Design with a focus on Systems Engineering and Unmanned Air Systems (UAS). Dr. Chaput is a retired Senior Technical Fellow - Air System Design and Integration from Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company where he