required, 4 credit-hour, first-yearengineering course at a medium-sized, private university. Course learning outcomes includedtopics in design and intellectual property, among a range of other foundational areas.Coursework included a major team-based, design-and-build project. This project had a slightlycompetitive aspect in that bonus points were awarded to the team that built the best project.Three years ago, one of the authors conceived and implemented a “class patent” system wherebyteams could write and submit an application to patent a project idea. By patenting an idea, a teamcould hope to gain competitive advantage in achieving the best project. As a pedagogical study, we sought to determine the effects of the class patent system
AC 2007-803: MEASURING STUDENT ABILITY TO WORK ONMULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMS: BUILDING AND TESTING A RUBRICCarolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of Engineering at Montana State University. She works on various curriculum and instruction projects including instructional development for faculty and graduate students, assessment of student learning, and program evaluation. Prior to coming to MSU, Plumb was at the University of Washington, where she directed the Engineering Communication Program. While at the UW, Plumb also worked as an Instructional Development and Assessment Specialist for the School of
AC 2008-1523: DEVELOPMENT OF AN AD-HOC CURRICULUM ADVISINGTOOL TO IMPROVE STUDENT PROGRESS USING CPM AND PERT ANALYSISVirgilio Gonzalez, University of Texas-El Paso Page 13.416.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Development of an Ad-hoc Curriculum Advising Tool to Improve Student Progress Using CPM and PERT AnalysisAbstractThe paper demonstrates the application of two project management tools designed to help thestudents complete their curriculum sooner. The first tool provides a visualization map of coursesequences, customized for each student, making advising adjustments that will optimize the timeto obtain the degree under a constrained
Illinois State University, and a technology education teacher at Central Catholic High School in Bloomington, Illinois. His professional activities have included directing several curriculum development projects for the State of Illinois, researching people's attitudes towards technology, working with public schools to enhance their technology education programs, and serving as a curriculum consultant for the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He is currently an active member in the National Center for Engineering and Technology Education.Linda Katehi, University of Illinois Linda Katehi is the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs at the University of Illinois at
Mechanical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 1998, and has five years of experience as a Mechanical Design Engineer at General Electric Aircraft Engines.David Burnette, Ohio University David Burnette was both an undergraduate student who participated in the OU ME Sr. capstone design project, and an OU ME graduate student who helped compile the student comments and complete the literature search for this study. He is currently an employee of the Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory. Page 13.1349.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 USING PERFORMANCE REVIEWS IN CAPSTONE
AC 2008-1728: GEARING UP FOR THE FUTURE: A K-12/UNIVERSITYPARTNERSHIP TO CREATE AN ENGINEERING MAGNET ELEMENTARYSCHOOLElizabeth Parry, North Carolina State University ELIZABETH A. PARRY is currently the Project Director of RAMP-UP, a K12 math outreach program funded by the GE Foundation and the National Science Foundation GK-12 Program. She obtained her BS degree in engineering management with a minor in mechanical engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla in 1983. After over 10 years with IBM, she has spent the last 20 years working on K-12 engineering and STEM issues and initiatives, particularly in support of underrepresented groups.Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University
this trend. The Engineering Projects in Community Service learning (EPICS)Program at Purdue University8,9 has reported higher percentages of underrepresentedstudents and chapters of Engineers Without Borders have reported many chapters beingat or near gender balance.While the university programs are an asset, to impact the pipeline of engineering studentswould require pre-college programs to draw students into the college pipeline. Drawingstudents into this pipeline requires students to have a basic knowledge of engineering, tobe interested in engineering, and dissipating the current views of what it means to be anengineer. This paper will describe how a service-learning model has been adapted to thehigh school environment to encompass these
performance criteria were also provided. The five performance criteria developedfor this outcome, are based on Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Conference The University of New Mexico - Albuquerque Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering Education 1. Ability to define a problem: This performance criterion is assessed by determining if students are able to (i) identify the customer and the needs, (ii) identify and list the design objectives, and (iii) identify the design constraints. 2. Ability to plan the project: This performance criterion is also assessed by determining if students are able to (i) define the
, Page 13.1038.3operated, and managed a highly successful REU Program in Nanotechnology for over ten years.This program began under the National Nanotechnology Users Network (NNUN) whichconsisted of five of the current NNIN sites: Cornell University, Howard University,Pennsylvania State University, Stanford University, and University of California Santa Barbara.In 2004, with the awarding of the NNIN, the REU program grew to include seven additionalsites: Georgia Institute of Technology, Harvard University, University of Michigan, Universityof Minnesota, University of New Mexico, University of Texas (Austin), and University ofWashington. The objectives of the NNIN REU program are: • Provide advanced nanotechnology research project experience
AC 2009-1798: COLLABORATION WITH INDUSTRY TO PROMOTE ENERGYCONSERVATION AND EDUCATIONMahmoud Alahmad, University of Nebraska, LincolnPatrick Wheeler, University of Nebraska, OmahaAvery Schwer, University of Nebraska, LincolnDale Tiller, University of Nebraska, LincolnAndrea Wilkerson, University of Nebraska, LincolnJoshua Eiden, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Page 14.334.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Collaboration with Industry to Promote Energy Conservation and EducationAbstractThe cooperation between academia and industry exposed Architectural Engineering studentsto a unique learning opportunity. The project
teamwork, and satisfies the majority of the ABET 3a-k criteria. Experiencegained from disseminating the case studies through the earlier NSF CCLI grants, as well asreports from others, shows that there are many significant challenges in introducing multimediacase studies into engineering classrooms. Some of the challenges are: changes in the role of theinstructor, apprehension about using innovative materials, difficulties in evaluating and testingstudents, and training students to engage in effective team work. The goals of this project werederived in order to address these challenges. They are to provide faculty members with hands-on experience of working in teams, explain case study teaching strategies, connect STEMtheories to the real-world
competence in design4.Design ModelA conceptual model for knowledge and abilities is one of three legs of the Assessment Triangle,used as a basis for knowing what students know1. Therefore, creation of valid assessments forcapstone engineering design courses requires such a model for engineering design. Design modeldevelopment presented here is part of a National Science Foundation project entitled:“Transferable Assessments for Capstone Engineering Design Courses”. Project leadership froma diverse multi-institution and multidisciplinary team offers potential for producing a model thatis transferable across widely varied capstone course environments.Achievement targets in capstone engineering design courses must be stated clearly so thatperformance
lead an Innovative Curriculum Design Team and directed OSU faculty and students in the research component of the project. On the smART project, Kerry serves as the arts partner and K-12 education specialist.Dr. Deborah M. Grzybowski, Ohio State University Dr. Deborah Grzybowski is a Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education and the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at The Ohio State University. She received her Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering and her B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering from The Ohio State University. Her research focuses on making engineering accessible to all students, including students with visual impairments, through the use of art-infused curriculum
sustainability in software engineering is presented in [11].Among the conclusions, authors highlight that in spite of the increasing attention sustainabilityhas received in software engineering during the last years, it is still not clearly defined norunderstood. In practice, software sustainability issues arise due to main factors: firstly, the time-to-market pressure during software development projects on which sustainability is anafterthought, and secondly, the software engineers’ lack of education and skills for applyingsustainability-improvement techniques [12].Three main approaches for classifying software sustainability works are as follows [5]: (i)considering sustainability as a part of software quality [13], (ii) using quality attributes
@uw.eduAbstractMicroprocessor Systems Design is a core course in our curricula of both Computer Engineering andSystems (CES) program and Electrical Engineering (EE) program. It is offered to seniors in the autumnquarter and requires prerequisite on Computer Architecture which covers subjects including instructionset design, and assembly programming.As a continuation of a 200 level core course - Introduction to Logic Design, and a 300 level core course -Digital Systems Design with FPGA using Verilog, also functioning as a bridge to Senior Project, our 400level Microprocessor Systems Design course focuses on introducing hardware and software designtechniques for microprocessor-based systems.Back to a decade ago, when first designing this course, several processor
Engineering Calculus II course focused on mathematic topics more relevant to EET andMECET. In addition, the course included laboratory projects which utilized the open-sourceSageMath software and illustrated the applications of the mathematics to EET and MECET. Theeffectiveness of the new Engineering Calculus II course was assessed using two methods. A finallaboratory project was assigned at the end of the course and assessed with a rubric. In addition,the effect of the new course on EET students was assessed using the Electrical/ElectronicsTechnology Outcome Assessment that was regularly used for assessment for ETAC/ABETaccreditation. Approval to use student data was obtained from the university's InstitutionalReview Board (IRB) which ensures that
fermentation processes.Andrew Phillips, University of GlasgowDr. Duncan J Bremner, University of Glasgow Dr Duncan Bremner has over 30 years in the semiconductor industry and has held operational and strategic executive roles in product development and technology planning within leading organisations such as National Semiconductor and The Intel Corporation. Duncan is presently employed by the University of Glasgow’s School of Engineering working with both academic staff and industry partners to develop collaborative projects. He is also responsible for the development and delivery of the course on Professional Practice for Engineers in China. Duncan has been active in promoting a system view of Sensor Systems and more
-BasedCurriculum Matrix, which combines Barrows’ Taxonomy of teaching methods with Jonassen’sProblem Typology, was used as a tool. The tool helps enumerate the different types of problem-based learning (PBL) techniques that were used in the course. The tool illustrated that the courseused more PBL the second time it was taught. Outcomes of teaching the SCM course in twosemesters were compared by class average grade, grade distribution, students’ perception of thelevel of challenge in their work on a design project, and IDEA teaching evaluation scores fromstudents. The paper will explain the process used and show the results from the first and secondtime the course was taught.KeywordsProblem-Based Learning, Supply Chain ManagementIntroductionIn the senior
Materials, Quality Control/Quality Assurance, Pavement Management and Rehabilitation, and Statistics related to Pavement Materials. In the past, Dr. Villiers worked on several projects sponsored by various agencies including the Florida Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and University Transportation Research Center Region-II. Some of his most recently completed and on-going work include the use of driving simulator to investigate patterns of drivers’ behavior during various rainfall event using different roadway geometries. Deliverables from this project may help Florida Department of Transportation and other agencies with future decision making, such as variable message signs, determining
team development experience which he uses to influence and enrich his involvement with various training and development research based projects purposed to build effective and impactful teams and leaders.Mr. Zachary W Cook, Seattle Pacific University Zachary W. Cook is a master’s student in Industrial-Organizational Psychology at Seattle Pacific Univer- sity. He is passionate about developing people, and utilizing research based practices in this endeavor.Natalie Goode, Seattle Pacific University Natalie Goode is a Master’s student at Seattle Pacific University studying Industrial-Organizational Psy- chology.Mrs. Caitlin H. Wasilewski, Seattle Pacific University Caitlin H. Wasilewski is an Industrial
Engineering & Policy from Washington University in St. Louis.Dr. Frazier Benya, National Academy of Engineering Frazier Benya is a Program Officer in the National Academy of Engineering’s Center for Engineering Ethics and Society (CEES). She manages the projects run by CEES including the Online Ethics Center (OEC) for Engineering and Science website. Her work at the NAE has focused on ethics education for engineers and scientists; climate change, engineered systems, and society; energy ethics; and ethical and social issues with advancing military technologies. She received her Ph.D. in History of Science, Technology, and Medicine from the University of Minnesota in 2012 and her M.A. in Bioethics, also from the
explores student in-code comments as a self-explanation strategy for a given worked-example. The context of the study is a materials science and engineering programming coursethat involves in-class programming activities, as well as five computational projects ondisciplinary problems. The guiding research questions are: What are the characteristics of student self-explanations of programming worked examples involving a disciplinary context? How are student’s self-explanation characteristics related to their performance in a computational project involving a disciplinary context?Background Literature Computer programming is a complex skill to learn6. When novice programmers startlearning to code, they need to
, program and project management. LTC Raby teaches EV450 (Environmental Engineering for Community Development) and EV 481 (Water Resources Planning and Design).Mr. Erick Martinez, United States Military Academy Erick Martinez is a Captain in the United States Army and an Instructor in the Department of Geogra- phy and Environmental Engineering at the United States Military Academy. He is a 2007 graduate of the United States Military Academy with a B.S. in Environmental Engineering and recently graduated from the University of Florida with an M.E. in Environmental Engineering. He teaches Environmen- tal Engineering for Community Development, Environmental Science, and Environmental Engineering Technologies.Col
electrical and systems. He has conducted several projects to reduce carbon dioxide and other building emission impacts by evaluating and improving the energy practices through the integration of sustainable systems with existing systems. His current research focuses on engaging and educating students in sustainable and green buildings’ design and energy conservation. He is currently investigating various ways to reduce energy consumption in office buildings. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Energy Consumption Trends for AC Systems in a Typical House Maher Shehadi, PhD Assistant Professor, School of Engineering
(UGA) College of Engineering Capstone Syllabus, acapstone is a “two-semester sequence course that is project based and focused on problemframing, stakeholder analysis, concept generation, and project management skills.” The goal “isto review concepts in the design process and tools in design methodology with a focus onengineering systems development cycle. Students working in multidisciplinary teams areassigned to design problems that are open-ended, requiring creativity and involving iterativesolutions.” It continues to state that “Design systems will work independently with a facultymentor and adopts the design that can be rapid prototyped or manufactured and evaluated againstthe design requirements. Student teams present their design
results in designs that are not optimized. A mechatronic systemsapproach involves the simultaneous optimization of all aspects of the design over its life cycle.The Mechatronics course was designed as a first course in mechatronics that makes use of themore advanced mathematical knowledge of electrical and mechanical engineering seniors. Thecourse emphasized mathematical modeling and a term project involving the design of amechatronic system was required. Twelve of the enrolled students were electrical and one wasmechanical engineering majors. All aspects of mechatronics were covered, including:mechatronics system design, modeling and simulation of physical systems, sensors andtransducers, actuators, system control, signals and systems, signal
were funded as curriculumdevelopment projects in 1998 (e.g., Enhanced Engineering Education Experience DUE-8854555and Integrated First Year Engineering Curriculum DUE-8953553), with the first of the eight fullfledged engineering coalitions funded in 1999 as multi-institutional experiments in innovation inengineering education. By 1991, an award was made to Richard Felder of North Carolina StateUniversity for a longitudinal study of the effects of innovative teaching (DUE-9150407) and in1993 prestigious NSF Young Investigator awards were given to engineers Cynthia Atman of theUniversity of Washington (DRL-9358516) and Martin Ramirez of Johns Hopkins University(DRL-9358518). Atman’s research examined how first-year engineering students
representatives. Selected projects may follow one of two paths:the new venture path (regional start-ups) or the technology transfer path (licenses).The most promising products/systems take the new venture path, and the student developers whohave now graduated are offered the opportunity to continue in the development of a newbusiness through an undergraduate-dedicated technology incubator located at Texas A&MUniversity. To develop and grow its business, each company receives one full year of support inthe incubator. After this, the company leaves the incubator and local economic developmentcouncils work with these start-up businesses by offering incentives to keep them in local area .If the project is not selected for incubator support, the student
first in Pittsburgh and then in Brazil. AnNSF IGERT provides graduate education and research opportunities; a US Department ofEducation GAANN project provides additional graduate fellowships. A University of PittsburghGAP (Global Academic Partnership) will provide funding to bring US and Brazilian researcherstogether to develop additional research initiatives. Finally, the School of Engineering isestablishing student chapters of both Engineers without Borders (EWB) and Engineers for aSustainable World (ESW) that will enable students and faculty to address problems of thedeveloping world through global service learning.The following sections will present more details of our current and planned activities focusing onthe progress at the end of the
two representative student projects. This workalso discusses the results of two surveys on student perceptions of a course in AR under thehypothesis that, because AR encompasses several elements shown to be engaging in theclassroom, students would perceive AR as highly engaging. The first survey was administered tostudents who participated in the course, while the second was given to the general computingpopulation within SPSU. The goal of the survey is to help educators make informed coursedecisions using the data collected.IntroductionAs a new technology emerges, students are naturally curious about how it works and how itmight be applied across a variety of contexts. Frequently, however, there are significant costsassociated with working