Computer and Information Technology at Purdue Univer- sity. Dr. Ngambeki graduated from Smith College with a B.S. in Engineering and from Purdue University with a PhD in Engineering Education. Dr. Ngambeki’s research is focused on the intersection of human behavior and computing, specifically how educational and policy interventions can be used to improve human interactions with technology. Dr. Ngambeki’s key areas of research interest include: STEM Education, Cybersecurity Education, Cybersecurity Policy, Social Engineering, Information Technology Ethics, and Cybersecurity Workforce Development.Dr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and
Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making Systems Engineering I Systems Engineering II Electrical Engineering Capstone Table 1: Courses for MSEE Master’s ProgramThe EML approach using the KEEN framework will help provide further relevance andmotivation for the student in coming up with entrepreneurial ideas for their projects.Capstone Course DescriptionThe capstone course offers the student the opportunity to integrate skills developed throughoutthe graduate program by completing a project that focuses on a current issue or need requiring anengineering solution. Since the program has two system engineering courses, the capstonecourse was used
study proposes severalavenues for additional research.Narratives of Required Enthusiasm In interviews, engineering professors said that they hire student lab workers who seementhusiastic [11]. For example, Kate explained her normal procedure for hiring anundergraduate: “Usually [undergrads] approach me, say, ‘I’m looking for some research to do,’and I show them around the lab, and if they seem excited about it then I’m more willing to takethem on.” Excitement is not sufficient for selection, because Kate also expects curiosity andacceptable grades, but it is a significant factor. This practice implies a belief that performedinterest correlates with motivation, work ethic, and even ability. Likewise, undergraduatesexplained to me that
engineering educa- tion, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stan- ford University with an emphasis on structural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. Page 26.1747.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Work in Progress: Rubric development for year-long
combineengineering classes with social issues might be to use a multidisciplinary approach and tie into ahumanities course on “social factors in engineering use,” something jointly taught with ethics forexample. However, working across departmental lines was cited by one faculty member as oneof the biggest challenges at the college. Whatever specific approach is ultimately adopted, thereis an interest in exploring how service-learning can more fully integrated into the curriculum. Assuch, it may be time for S-L to begin to bring faculty together to explore those options.In a similar vein, there is concern among some of the faculty regarding the extent of theinstitutionalization of S-L. One faculty member expressed concern that SLICE is still
the Town of Dunstable’s wells. These projects were facilitated by a member of Dunstable’s Board of Health (which oversees water quality in the wells).• Students in various engineering statistics courses have performed statistical analyses of a survey data for the SLICE project and have analyzed crime data for the Lowell Police Department as well as health data from medical clinics in which the students have installed raiods, lights, vaccine fridges, and town water supplies.• In Engineering Ethics, which is required for engineering students, students have examined a number of issues related to Peruvian villages associated with the Peru Project. These issues included whether to provide solar-powered television systems, opportunities
of leadership Learn the 11. Realistic constraints (including DFX, Conceptual economic factors, etc.) Design 12. Development of related communication skills Process 13. Production of required documentation 14. Ability to do whole-brain thinkingMeet Project 15. Ability to apply the creative problem solving Sponsor process to a conceptual design problemRequirements 16. Ability to apply engineering analysis in complex open-ended problems 17. Use of quality tools (QFD, FMEA, robust engineering, etc.) 18. Engineering ethics, intellectual property, other just-in-time topics depending on project needs 19
An ability to understand professional, ethical, and emerging applications of mathematics, science, experiments and apply experimental results to An ability to conduct, analyze, and interpret, skills and modern tools of civil engineering
. Graduates are now calledupon to contribute to a dynamic global economy. They are sharing projects with colleagues around the Page 13.750.18world, and must exhibit managerial and entrepreneurial skills with a clearer understanding of othercultures and ethics (Chau, 2005). We believe that a good way to proceed is to: • Explore the most relevant skills to become more innovative • Develop multiple hands-on activity-based Innovation Modules, each of which aims at specific skills, and with focused objectives and outcomes • Aggregate the modules into Innovation Units that are actual classes required to be
An ability to understand professional, ethical, and emerging applications of mathematics, science, experiments and apply experimental results to An ability to conduct, analyze, and interpret, skills and modern tools of civil engineering
serves as an orientation course for freshman, orienting them to collegelife, assisting with the transition from high school to college and making sure they are aware ofall of the campus resources. In its capacity as an introductory course for incoming engineeringstudents, the course exposes students to all of the engineering disciplines taught at Speed School.It also increases their understanding of what engineers do, familiarizes them with engineeringdesign, ethics, professionalism, and some select software they will use in their engineeringcoursework.The course was redesigned in 2007, at the same time the Speed School was developing its i2aplan. It was decided at that time, the course design should include an emphasis on the
Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. She is co-coordinator of a first-year engineering course and her research interests include engineering ethics, curriculum development, and use of classroom technologies.Vinod Lohani, Virginia Tech VINOD K. LOHANI is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education and an adjunct faculty in Civil & Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech. He received a Ph.D. in civil engineering from Virginia Tech in 1995. His areas of teaching and research include engineering education, international collaboration and hydrology & water resources
their manner and work ethic and that the courses didnot improve that skill further. This is an interesting point and one that will warrant furtherdiscussion later when the USACE program is compared to the same class being offered in anacademic setting and in a non-Federal technically oriented planning and engineeringorganization.Figure 7 displays the responses of all the USACE people surveyed to help determine what someof the obstacles might be to getting improved participation in the Certificate Program. Whilestudents taking five or more courses basically said the subject matter was the biggest determiningfactor, those taking less courses indicated that additional impediments might be the time and daythe course is offered, the subject matter
presentationduring the Symposium (see subsection 3.F) and, possibly, a demonstration, if applicable. Duringthe course of the summer experience, the mentors provide guidance to their mentees aboutmatters of technical writing, ethics and scientific methodology. The write-up of the TR is beingperformed incrementally and a first draft is expected by week 7 of the summer experience.Eventually, the TRs and posters are collected in electronic form and posted on the Program’swebsite.D. All-Hands MeetingsAlmost each Friday the entire AMALTHEA community meets for the day at a common site,alternating between the campuses of both host universities. These meetings are referred to as All-Hands Meetings (AHMs). In total, each year 7 of them are held (end of week 2 to week
engineering students communicate better,become more ethical, and see the task of engineering in a larger cultural context. This is as itshould be, but is it possible that the field of design engineering might lend insight and wisdomback to the humanities? If engineering design principles are so helpful in unraveling themysteries of biology, might they also be useful in the social sciences? These are just some of thequestions being posed in an engineering elective course at Oral Roberts University (ORU),where undergraduate students wrestle with advanced concepts in reverse engineering. A recentarticle in ASEE Prism1 touts the benefits of having engineering students engage in the dissection
? What design constraints and factors are to be considered? Establish Value a. Feasibility (yes/no) Objectives b. Criterion Function Generate Feasible Accomplish functionality while considering feasibility criteria, including manufacture, support, operations, society, ethics, Alternatives environment, legalities, and safety. Apply the criterion function, including both objective measures Evaluate Alternatives and subjective factors
courses primarily address the state’scomprehensive technology and engineering curriculum. This curriculum includes instruction ondesign principles, various energy and power technologies (fluid, thermal and electrical systems),and communication, construction, and manufacturing technologies. In grades 10 through 12, thecourses cover more specialized curricula, governed by multiple vocational frameworks. TheEngineering Technology Vocational Framework includes Health and Safety, EmployabilitySkills, many varied Technical Skills (including but not limited to computers, electrical systems, Page 14.275.24applied ethics, design and modeling and
, thermodynamics, solid mechanics, fluids, and propulsion in a single course.The concept was to combine the material to emphasize the systems nature of aerospaceengineering. With this integrated approach to presenting the material, it became a naturalfit for the ABET 2000 requirements on social impact, ethics and economics. In responseto industry concerns that engineering students were becoming applied physicists insteadof engineers, MIT revamped its undergraduate curriculum. The result of a two-yearoverhaul was the Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate (CDIO) educational initiative.Emphasis is towards hands-on learning. Unified Engineering is still a key part of thecurriculum, but most core classes have added hands-on labs. Through the years, MIT
-Blackwood, Tracie Revis, Jeff Trevillion, Van Ha, Quintin Hughes, Bach Do, Yi Zhao,Ben Lopez, Johanna Rojas, Lauren Rieken, Anna Wong Lowe, Brittany Shanel Norwood,Sedelta Oosahwee, Tyler Combrink, Ruth Moaning, William Stephen Anderson, Ginger Murray,Andres Guerrero, Monica Flippin-Wynn, Mario Franklin, Wen-Yu Chao, Joshua Rogers andNathaniel Manzo; our National Advisory Board - Elaine Seymour, Karina Walters, LarrySchuman, David Bugg, James Borgford-Parnell, Mary Anderson-Rowland, and Antonio Lopez. References[1] Bouville, M., "Is Diversity Good? Six Possible Conceptions of Diversity and Six Possible Answers," Sciences and Engineering Ethics Vol. 14, 2008, pp. 51-63.[2] Chang, M.J., "Preservation
Global Century (2007), acknowledges theneeds for all college students to prepare for twenty-first-century challenges by gaining fouressential learning outcomes: 1) knowledge of human cultures and the physical and natural world,focused by engagement with big questions, both contemporary and enduring 2) intellectual andpractical skills, including inquiry and analysis, critical and creative thinking, written and oralcommunication, 3) personal and social responsibility, including foundations and skills forlifelong learning, ethical reasoning and action, intercultural knowledge and competence and 4)integrative learning, including synthesis and advanced accomplishment across general andspecialized studies. For Engineering students in particular
. That, of course, is expected and, indeed, desirable since ideas for program improve-ments should depend on the current state of the program, the details of the courses, the particularstrengths that the program’s faculty want students to acquire, etc. Page 14.493.131. Outcome 3.c: In some ways, this outcome which reads, “an ability to design a system, com- ponent, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, envi- ronmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”, captures the essence of engineering. Naturally, almost everyone of our technical courses
operations.The latter is particularly lacking. For example, absent entirely from the entrepreneurial mindsetapproach is the entrepreneur’s desire to create an organizational engine that runs, generatingrevenue and throwing off profit, without need for the entrepreneur’s constant attention.14The Case Study ApproachThe case study approach to teaching entrepreneurship is perhaps the least common type. It is anextension of the Harvard Business School case study method. Most entrepreneurship faculty areunfamiliar with this approach. Those who do adopt it will not find the rich set of case materialsthat are available in other disciplines. Case studies in management, organizational behavior,corporate finance, business ethics, and a wide range of other