think of others? • Some things, such as a person's forehead, indicate a problem when they are too hot or cold. Can you think of others? • Measuring the temperature of something can indirectly measure something that may be difficult to measure directly. Measuring the temperature of a wire can indicate the amount of current flowing through it. Can you think of other examples?A device providing a quick and inexpensive means of monitoring temperature visually could be used inmany ways in today's world. This module challenges you to create such a device.DESIGN CHALLENGE: As part of a team, you are to design, construct, and test a device that willdemonstrate a practical use for liquid crystals in the form of a
AC 2007-645: SUSTAINING MANUFACTURING WITH INNOVATIVERECRUITMENT STRATEGIESTruc Ngo, San Diego City College Dr. Truc Ngo holds a Ph.D. degree in Chemical Engineering, earned at Georgia Tech in 2001. During her time at Georgia Tech, she has published multiple research papers in major professional journals, including American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) Journal, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Journal of Supercritical Fluids and Green Chemistry. She was a National Science Foundation Research Fellow, President’s Fellow and the Recipient of Waldemar Ziegler Best Paper Award. Dr. Ngo has also spoken at many national and international conferences in the past ten years. For her
that theeducation of the future must be relevant, attractive, and connected to the needs of society atlarge. Considering this paradigm, the U. S. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) in its well-researched ABET Engineering Criteria 20005 (EC2000) proposed that thespirit of technopreneurship be integrated within the curriculum of all programs. It forcesuniversities to develop a process of assessing learning outcomes of programs that are consistentwith the original mission of the institution. The Criteria can be easily adapted to embrace alldisciplines. The desired attributes or outcomes for graduates of a baccalaureate program includean ability to:✔ apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering.✔ design and
9.840.1laboratory exercises, individual and group projects, and field experiences to enable 1451middle and high school students to directly experience authentic learning practices thatrequire them to use higher-order thinking skills; encourage creative problem-solvingskills that require collaborative learning, teamwork, writing, and presentation; cultivatean interest in service learning in which students are active participants, achieve outcomesthat show a perceptible impact, and engage in evaluative reflection; and better motivateand prepare secondary school students for advanced education. The Fellows have beentrained to create and implement these activities by taking
students in areas of progression and transition from undergraduate to graduate studies, research, and study abroad. Her research agenda and commitment to intellectual growth is driven by her life experience. While com- pleting her Master’s degree and for several years after, she worked in a family owned manufacturing firm. As a doctoral student, Shirl was recognized as an AGEP scholar and received the Bilsland Fellowship. Outstandingly, she collaborated in the creation of an innovation course and taught the initial offering. Un- til August 2014, she was a post-doctoral fellow researching entrepreneurship, innovation, and diversity. Today Dr. Donaldson’s research interests include entrepreneurship, innovation
and generated individual reports by each student for each of theexperiments. Four of the experiments were designed to compare experimental data withgenerally accepted correlations. The impact of a jet experiment used an apparatus that wasoriginally purchased from TecQuipment [11] and required the students to compare experimentaldata with data generated from a force balance. The depressurization of a tank experiment wasadapted from the work of Penney and Clausen [12] and the draining of a tank experiment (anoriginal experiment based on the work of Penney and Clausen) also compared experimental datato correlations from the literature and were particularly effective in applying Matlab principlesfrom the department’s Computer Methods course. The
participate voluntarily via the Collaboratory for Strategic Parnternships and Applied Research. His on-going projects include improving flight tracking and messaging systems for small planes in remote locations, and developing assistive communication technology for those with cognitive and behavioral challenges, such as high- functioning autism, or PTSD. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Formalizing Experiential Learning Requirements In An Existing Interdisciplinary Engineering Project CurriculumIn education, experiential learning has become a best practice, high-impact strategy, becauseengaging with real life problems heightens students’ interest, teaches them career
our mistakes and using these to build a strong foundation. WhileHenry Petroski was concerned about failures in engineering design, I believe the same applies toeducation. “I believe that the concept of failure – mechanical and structural failure in the context ofthis discussion – is central to understanding engineering, for engineering design has as its first andforemost objective the obviation of failure”.1 We also must learn from our past failures inengineering education. How can we justify such low graduation rates?I will take a brief tour down memory lane before looking at where we are today and where we maybe going in the future. Let’s start with the tools we had as engineers. To be an engineering student,you had to have your own slide
: varying behavior 7. Clearly has demonstrated impact with ideas and oral presentations 8. Takes initiative to assume responsibility 9. Directs program and project for implementation 10. Demonstrates the art of delegating, coaching, and providing follow-up IBM, however, practiced 100% guaranteed employment to their ET managers in 1970-1980 because it believed that today’s best mangers could never be equated as the worst ones nextyear! IBM never used the forced ranking method of bell-curve evaluation because it could not bedefended, until severe crisis hit the company due to external threat of competition as the entry topc became easy and IBM’s global dominance was reduced precipitously. Later researches havenot quite
bridge the gap between high school and college as well as preparing students for the rigors of mathematics. His research interests include engineering education, integration of novel technologies into engineering classroom, excellence in instruction, water, and wastewater treatment, civil engineering infrastructure, and transportation engi- neering.Mr. Ludvik Alkhoury, New Jersey Institute of Technology Mr. Ludvik Alkhoury is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Newark College of Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), Newark, NJ. He is currently the Lab instructor of Fundamentals of Engineering Design (FED) 101, a course that reviews the basic concepts of
- dyne (Pratt & Whitney), he helped design the Space Shuttle. As manager of Reactor Safety Analysis, Experimental Engineering, and Fluid Dynamics Technology at KAPL (Lockheed Martin), he conducted research for Naval Reactors. He currently serves as the Walter L. Robb director of Engineering Lead- ership and as an instructor in Engineering Science at Penn State. Erdman has chaired the local Jaycees, Department of Social Services Advisory Council, GE Share Board, and Curling Club; and served on the Human Services Planning Council, United Way, Chamber of Commerce, and Capital Fund Drive Boards of Directors. Erdman has also lectured on leadership topics at Penn State and RPI. He returned to campus frequently as a
a combination of the TEAMS (Tests of Engineering Aptitude,Mathematics and Science developed by the Junior Engineering Technical Society: JETS) test anda robotic competition between the twenty participating high schools and hosted by UNCCharlotte. The competitions are designed to encourage high school students to participate intechnology clubs and to provide some experience in a hands-on approach to solving engineeringtechnology problems.This paper will describe the activities of the project from the unique perspective of communitycollege faculty and staff that are directly responsible for the outcomes. We will also detailinformation about the high school clubs and the impact these activities have had on the students’awareness of engineering
after the course if they want tograduate in a reasonable time period (2 years or less). Since we use their topic, the research theyread and report on is relevant to their study.The use of breakout session to discuss problem statements, deliverables, and methodology givethe students opportunities for peer to peer review and critiques. Since the class has some workingprofessionals and a mix of majors, the peer to peer feedback is diverse and seems to positivelyimpact quality.RecommendationsThis approach can work well with mature, motivated graduate students. Use this approach withundergraduates is questionable. The approach only works for those well grounded in both thetheory and practice of the course topic and try to stay current via readings
and social cultures among the various STEM disciplines will undermine a ‘onesize fits all’ retention plan. Based upon departmental needs analyses and published research onpossible ‘fits’ from successful STEM initiatives at other institutions, we designed PRIMES toblend two general strands that would support these anticipated outcomes: 1. Transform Teaching and Learning: Improved retention as a result of expanding our undergraduate teaching assistance (UTA) programs and institutionalizing a formal UTA training pedagogy. A working knowledge in best practices will enable them to be both effective and engaging in the laboratory and/or classroom. 2. Increase Faculty and Student Interactions: Improved retention as a
is a State of Indiana Registered domestic mediator.Mr. Mark T Schuver, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mark Schuver is the Director for the Center for Professional Studies in Technology and Applied Re- search (ProSTAR) in the College of Technology at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. He is responsible for the administration/operations of the Center with Program Management oversight of the Rolls-Royce Master’s Degree, the Construction Management Master’s Degree and non-credit certificate programs for working professionals in the College of Technology. Prior to joining Purdue in 2002, Mark was employed by Caterpillar Inc. for 35 years with assignments in Product Design, Research and De- velopment
, M.Phil. in Engineering from the University of Cambridge, and M.S. in Civil Engi- neering from Stanford University. He is a licensed Professional Engineer (Alaska), LEED Accredited Professional, and Envision Sustainability Professional. His research interests include sustainable design, construction, infrastructure, and engineering education.Major Berndt Spittka P.E., U.S. Military AcademyDr. Seamus F Freyne P.E., Mississippi State University Page 24.762.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Inspiring Student Engagement through Two-Minute FolliesAbstractShort, in
: “Engineering programs must demonstratethat their graduates have…”ABET Criteria: Related Assignment:(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility 4, 5(g) an ability to communicate effectively 1-6(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering 3-5solutions in a global and societal context(i) recognition of the need for, and ability to engage in life-long learning 3-5(j) a knowledge of contemporary issues 4,5The course website structure appears in Table 3, which links the student to further resources inall key areas: syllabus and
AC 2008-701: ENERGIZING AN INTRODUCTORY CHEMICAL ENGINEERINGCOURSE WITH BIODIESELKatherine Taconi, University of Alabama, Huntsville Dr. Katherine A. Taconi is an Assistant Professor of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. She received her B.S. (2000) and Ph.D. (2004) degrees from Mississippi State University and joined the faculty at UA Huntsville in 2004. Her research efforts include investigating the biological production of value-added compounds from various waste streams and co-products of biofuel production, such as crude glycerol. As a faculty member, Dr. Taconi has taught Computer Methods for Chemical Engineers, Design and Analysis of
University (Fort Collins, CO, USA). She has experience working as a graduate teaching assistant for computer aided engineering, biomedical engi- neering capstone design, and biomedical engineering introductory classes. Nicole’s engineering education interests include active learning, metacognitive thinking, and the use of technology platforms. Her doc- toral research is focused on the material properties of spinal cord tissues to contribute to the understanding and treatment of spinal cord injuries.Jasmine Erin Nejad, Colorado State University Jasmine Nejad is a PhD student in the Biomedical Engineering program at Colorado State University (CSU). She completed her B.S. in Biochemistry and M.S. in Biomedical Engineering at
14.998.3Elementary school teachers were reported by their administrators to be most comfortablewith the life sciences and least with the physical sciences and largely ignorant ofengineers and engineering design.Moreover, at both the elementary school and middle school levels, there was perceived tobe a lack of awareness of STEM fields and careers and their importance.Following that meeting, an e-mail was sent to the Northeast Network partners askingthem to bring a list of "best practices" STEM programs for students in upper elementaryand middle schools to the next meeting of the Advisory Council. At this next meeting, theAdvisory Council members decided to concentrate on in-school programs for theelementary school students, as opposed to after school
Engineering (NAE), the National Science Foundation(NSF), and the National Research Council (NRC) have charged engineering schools to prepareengineers for global workforces.3-5 The American Society for Engineering Education’s (ASEE)Green Report (2010) also calls for engineering colleges to adapt curricula and programs to Page 26.874.3incorporate “an appreciation of different cultures and business practices, and the understandingthat the practice of engineering is now global.”6 Additionally, ABET requires engineeringprograms to demonstrate that their graduates have “the broad education necessary to understandthe impact of engineering solutions in a
and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data3. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs4. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams5. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems6. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility7. an ability to communicate effectively8. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context9. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning10. a knowledge of contemporary issues11. an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.Each program must have an assessment
innovative plan for thedevelopment, implementation, and evaluation of an effective curriculum of CFD intended as acommon course for senior undergraduate and junior graduate level students. The curriculum isbeing designed with learning objectives, applications, conditions, and exercise notes. One of themain objectives is to teach students from novice to expert users preparing them with adequatefluid mechanics fundamentals and hands-on CFD project works in order to prepare them for theircapstone design projects, higher education and further research in fluid mechanics. We haveplanned to incorporate a CFD educational interface for hands-on student experience in fluidmechanics, which reflects real-world engineering applications used in companies
children using different of engaging students of all ages, especially minorities andrepresentations and helps them to learn and practice traditionally excluded groups [3]. The target students for ourthe concepts using a “hands-on” approach. Further, use experiment are all African Americans and are amongst theof multiple representations supports the learning needs least likely to have access to and benefit from CS withoutof diverse learners, considering the grades and ages of intervention. Considering the ages of our population and thethe participants. Specifically, we present CS concepts to notion that CS concepts tend to be abstract, we employed astudents in three formats: 1) using
new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet's research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable structures, products, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change.Natalie Plata © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The Development of Sociotechnical Thinking in Engineering UndergraduatesIntroductionOver the course
curriculum. Engineering design courses are frequently used to givestudents opportunities to practice entrepreneurial skills while working on real world engineeringproblems (Shartrand and Weilerstein, 2012). Entrepreneurial-Minded Learning (EML) pedagogyhas been developed as techniques that emphasize students learning to create value, gather andassimilate information to discover opportunities or insights for further action (Melton, 2014). TheEML pedagogy provides engineering faculty with a useful and effective tool for embeddingentrepreneurship modules within individual technical courses. Rather than displacing technicalcontent, EML promotes inductive learning and allows students to explore the “why”, “real-worldrelevance”, and “impact” of the
and reflection in order to reach anethical decision. All of the potential scenarios encountered by practicing engineers could neverbe covered in one code of ethics. They are principles and standards to follow and not a cookbooksolution outlining steps to resolve every ethical situation.MethodologyA junior level course was developed a number of years ago titled Technology in WorldCivilization (Loendorf17, 2004) that was designed to broaden the students' perspective of pasttechnologies and how they were discovered and used. The main objectives of the course were to:(a) promote awareness of technological development, and (b) provide a rudimentaryunderstanding of their social, political, economic, and cultural impact. Three years ago, alearning
framework to integrate marketing’sfocus on the customer, research, information technology, and the core benefit into the innovationprocess with the engineer’s focus on function and technology. The contributions marketing andengineering make to each phase of the product innovation process are emphasized. The secondtheme is iteration and adaptation. As marketing and engineering develop information about theproduct and its potential market, the design and marketing plan must change. Suggestions aremade for improving the courses based on what has been learned and where the program is going.I. Introduction Before the winter2003 semester Engineering 610, Engineering Design, was taught nottaught with any links to a marketing course. The course
classroom energyand spontaneity. But time lags also make nearly impossible many activities that require synchrony,such as singing or performing coordinated gestures, such as high fives. Trying to sing choral musicin Zoom produces an unlistenable cacophony, and trying shake hands produces painfully awkwardhesitation and miscoordination. Impacts of Remote Interaction on Course ActivitiesThe Innovation in Technology course meets in a weekly three-hour class session for fifteen weeksplus a presentation to a panel of start-up experts during finals week. The course’s principal outcomesinvolve knowledge and skills useful in innovative design of technology: improvisation, storytelling,critical thinking, and creativity and ideation. For
: ≠ Orientation workshops for instructors which highlight the background educational research, student survey data from previous semesters, and provide activities to practice writing open-ended higher-order thinking questions. These workshops built a community of users and provided more information to faculty about best practices in scientific teaching. ≠ Meetings between the instructors and the programmer to learn how the instructors would tag responses. Our team began with the idea of being able to quickly sort responses and provide feedback. After talking to faculty we found that there are many methods of sorting responses and different perspectives on the types of feedback that should be sent to