, they are inherently benefitting society.Missing from the conversations were discussions of civic responsibility for an engineer. Onestudent talked about wanting to positively affect society by working on building codecommittees, and two other students highlighted an engineer’s ability to educate the public aboutissues like hydraulic fracturing. None of the students, however, talked directly about the needfor engineers to influence legislation or guide public policy. With only six of the 535 membersof congress being engineers, and only 11 from Science, Technology, Engineering orMathematics (STEM) backgrounds17, it is not surprising that ideas of civic responsibility arelacking in the discourse surrounding the role of engineers in society.(c
., Engineering Ethics, 4th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.2. Lathem, S., M. Neumann, and N. Hayden. 2011. The Socially Responsible Engineer: Assessing Student Attitudesof Roles and Responsibilities. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3):p. 444-474.3. Redish, E., Smith, K., Looking Beyond Content; Skill Development for Engineers. Journal of EngineeringEducation. 97(3):p. 295-307.4. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. 1997.ABET Code of Ethics ofEngineers.http://wadsworth.cengage.com/philosophy_d/templates/student_resources/0534605796_harris/cases/Codes/abet.htm (accessed January 3, 2014).5. Gilbane Gold. 1989. 24 min. Lubbock, TX: National Institute for Engineering Ethics, Texas Tech University.(DVD)6. Sweeney, R. 2013
. New York, NY: Henry Holt.11. Mead, G.H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.12. Musil, Caryn McTighe. Gender, Science and the Undergraduate Curriculum: Building Two-Way Streets. Washington, DC: AACU, 2001. wee www.acu-edu.org/publications13. National Council for Research on Women, Balancing the Equation: Where are Women and Girls in Science, Engineering and Technology? (2001)14. Nelson, M.B. (1998). Embracing victory: Life lessons in competition and compassion. New York: William Morrow.15. Rosser, Sue V., ed., “Building Inclusive Science: Connecting Women’s Studies and Women in Science and Engineering,” Women’s Studies Quarterly, 200016. Rosser, Sue V.ed., Teaching the Majority: Breaking the
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Session 3561Jones, Elizabeth A. Transforming the Curriculum: Preparing Students for a ChangingWorld, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 29(3), Adrianna J. Keyser, Series Editor,San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 2003.Myers, Chet and Thomas Jones. Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the CollegeClassroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.National Academy of Sciences. “Improving Undergraduate Instruction in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Report of a Workshop,”http://www.nap.edu/openbook/0309089298/html, The National Academy of Sciences,copyright 2003.CHARLES E. LEISERSONProfessor Leiserson
their ETCS 101Introduction to Engineering, Technology and Computer Science course2. Without a doubt, the introduction of early intervention programs and application-orientedfreshman engineering courses are significant steps toward increasing student retention,motivation and success in engineering. That said, the correlation between retention rates andthe inability of incoming students to progress through the required calculus sequence cannot beignored. This problem is not unique to WSU, and in recent years has received substantialattention in the engineering education literature10-16. The general consensus thus far is that thetraditional approach of teaching students the required mathematical theory simply as aprerequisite to subsequent
Physics and Chemistry courses. This is one of theadvantages of five-year programs, which prepare versatile professionals with a solid backgroundformation, as noted by a recent ABET accreditation visit to this campus. Students’ opinionsconcur since they are aware that any additional skill learned represents an edge for their eventualjob search.References1. J. A. Jacobs, Advanced Engineering Materials: Products from Super Stuff, The Technology Teacher, 52 [8],(1993): pp.15-22.2. D. R. Askeland, The Science and Engineering of Materials, 3rd. Edition, PWS Publ. Co., Boston, MA, (1994).3. W. D. Callister, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 5th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, NY,(1999): pp. 40-45.4. S. M. Kresta, Hands-on
the mechanism ofinteraction of biophysical factors in the processes of tissue development, healing, and adaptation. Dr. McLeodreceived a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1986. Page 6.440.9 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education
’ attitudes towards engineering, design, and technology with anintroduction to makerspace [14], the researchers analyzed the sense of belonging among studentsby utilizing an adaptation of a previously validated scale [15]. For the sorting procedure, threesurvey statements were sampled to represent and assess belonging.Methods and ResultsA total of 43 survey statements were sampled from 5 different sources (described in the previoussection) by mapping each statement to the intended construct. Table 1 provides a detailedaccount of the statements that were extracted from each survey instrument.Table 1: Survey statements sampled with intended sub-construct. Intended sub- Statement
as a social experience particularly in terms of gender and race among underrepresented college students in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics). He has presented his scholarship at research conferences organized by the American Educational Research Association, Association for the Study of Higher Education, and Out in STEM Incorporated. Luis holds professional experience in various STEM student support initiatives at Rutgers University including the STEM Talent Expansion Program, Upward Bound Math-Science, and Project Advancing Graduate Edu- cation. He is a certified K-12 mathematics teacher in New Jersey with a Master’s degree in Mathematics Education and Bachelor’s degree in Mathematics from
for Engineering and Technology(ABET) states that “to succeed in these global professions, graduates must be prepared to thrivein diverse and inclusive environments” [37]. Furthermore, the American Society of EngineeringEducation affirms that “diversity and inclusiveness is essential to enriching educationalexperiences and innovations that drive the development of creative solutions in addressing theworld's challenges” [38]. Many professional societies reiterate these sentiments in their ownstatements. For example, the Society of Manufacturing Engineers is “commit[ed] to promotingdiversity and inclusion of all within our community [and] believe that diverse perspectives andtalents are essential within manufacturing research” [39].Rationale
,computer science, and information technology as potential areas of study. This research seeks todetermine why students choose one engineering field vs. another and what influencers affect thatdecision. This research also seeks to investigate why students chose to change majors into thefield of engineering or why students switch from one engineering major to another. Research Question 4: How do important influencers on the choice of engineering major affect students’ choice to select an engineering major or switch majors within the engineering field?Understanding results could lead to the development of K-12 programs that expose students tocorrect perceptions of the wide variety of engineering majors and careers, and allow
Science Foundation that provides resources for the research and development of distributed medical monitoring technologies and learning tools that utilize biomedical contexts. His research focuses on (1) plug-and-play, point-of-care medical monitoring systems that utilize interoperability standards, (2) wearable sensors and signal processing techniques for the determination of human and animal physiological status, and (3) educational tools and techniques that maximize learning and student interest. Dr. Warren is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Jianchu Yao, East Carolina University Jianchu (Jason) Yao
has a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech and received a Master’s of Civil Engineering and an Ed.D. in Technology Education from N.C. State University. He specializes in developing and integrating project-based activities into the K-12 classroom that incorporate engineering and STEM learning concepts as well as providing professional development for K-12 teachers.Dr. Frank M. Bowman, University of North Dakota Dr. Frank Bowman is Associate Professor, Tom Owens Fellow, and Associate Chair in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of North Dakota. He holds a Ph.D. from the California Institute of Technology and a B.S from Brigham Young University, both in Chemical Engineering. His research
focus is human performance and cognition.Dr. Adedeji B. Badiru P.E., Air Force Institute of Technology Prof. Badiru is Dean and senior academic officer for the Graduate School of Engineering and Management at the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT). He has oversight for planning, directing, and controlling operations related to granting doctoral and master’s degrees, professional continuing cyber education, and research and development programs. He was previously Professor and Head of Systems Engineering and Management at the AFIT, Professor and Department Head of Industrial & Information Engineering at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, and Professor of Industrial Engineering and Dean of University
Paper ID #21663Global Engineering Competency: Assessment Tools and Training StrategiesProf. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies
Theodori, Johns Hopkins University Whiting School of Engineeering Ms. Theodori is a Program Coordinator for the Johns Hopkins University Whiting School of Engineer- ing’s Technical Management, Engineering Management and Space Systems Engineering. She also has developed online and blended classroom courses for the program and lectures in Information Research and Advanced Technology. Ms. Theodori is a Principal Staff member at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory working in information management, policy and communication. Judith re- ceived her Bachelor’s in Labor Relations from San Francisco State University in 1983, and her Masters in Library Science from Queens College in 1998.Dr. James D Beaty
. degree from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India in 1987 and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Michigan State University, East Lansing, in 1990 and 1993 respectively. From 1995 to 1999 she was with the Mixed-Signal Design Group at LSI Logic Corporation, Milpitas, CA where she worked on high-speed data communication IC design and testing.Dr. Tonya Lynn Nilsson P.E., Santa Clara University Tonya Nilsson is a Lecturer in Civil Engineering at Santa Clara University (SCU), where she is also one of six Faculty Associates in their Collaborative for Teaching Innovation. Prior to joining SCU, Tonya was an Associate Professor at CSU - Chico
Health Engineering in the Depart- ment of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering and the Director of the Center for Research in Water Resources at the University of Texas in Austin. Dr. Reible holds a Ph.D. in Chemical Engi- neering from the California Institute of Technology, and is a Board Certified Environmental Engineer, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #28764 a Professional Engineer (Louisiana), and was elected to the National Academy of Engineering in 2005 for the ”development of widely used approaches for the management of contaminated sediments”. His
AbstractOften, engineering departments are faced with the need to update laboratory exercises andequipment. However, adequate funds do not always exist to accomplish these upgrades in atimely manner. Another challenge faced by departments are satisfying Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) requirements for a major design experience within thecurriculum. ABET guidelines state, “Students must be prepared for engineering practice throughthe curriculum culminating in a major design experience based on the knowledge and skillsacquired in earlier course work and incorporating engineering standards and realistic constraintsthat include most of the following considerations: economic; environmental; sustainability;manufacturability; ethical
models, synthesis techniques and engineering principles governing the technology in their project. By insisting that the ECE Design I proposals explore and identify the models and engineering principles involved, the temptation of "cut-and-try" designing can possibly be diverted and at best completely avoided. This proposal is strong enough to effectively avoid inappropriate "cut-and-try" designing. (encircle choice) (emphatically disagree) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (emphatically agree) E) Project's scope; (too simple) (just right) (too ambitious) (encircle choice) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 F) Project's effect on student's ability to use engineering
,learning to think critically allows students to make up their own minds. Conventional engineering Page 8.918.5education, by not questioning any application of technology, creates a values vacuum in whichProceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Session 2692everything is sanctioned, or nothing, so that students have no basis for decision-making.Applying Liberative Pedagogies in the Engineering Classroom
AC 2011-1837: EVOLVING IDENTITIES: UNDERGRADUATE WOMENPURSUING THE ENGINEERING PROFESSORIATESarah Hug, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Sarah Hug is Research Associate at the Alliance for Technology, Learning, and Society (ATLAS) Institute, University of Colorado at Boulder. Dr. Hug earned her PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Her research and evaluation efforts focus on learning science, tech- nology, engineering, and mathematics, with a special interest in communities of practice, creativity, and experiences of underrepresented groups in these fields across multiple contexts.A. Susan Jurow, University of Colorado at Boulder A. Susan Jurow is an Assistant Professor and Co
. Evidence that the students incorporated sustainability into theirconcept of civil engineering was also collected based on other course assignments. There issome evidence that female and minority students may be more likely to articulate the importanceof sustainability in the context of civil engineering, although more research is needed on thistopic due to the small numbers of female students in the class.BackgroundAll engineers should be familiar with the concept of sustainability. ABET lists sustainability asone of the constraints for engineering designs under Criterion 3 Program Outcome C.1 TheNational Academy of Engineering’s (NAE) The Engineer of 2020 report notes “Engineeringpractices must incorporate attention to sustainable technology, and
Paper ID #22068Additive Manufacturing Studios: a New Way of Teaching ABET StudentOutcomes and Continuous ImprovementDr. Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technological University Currently, Dr. Fidan serves as a Professor of the Department of Manufacturing and Engineering Tech- nology at Tennessee Technological University. His research and teaching interests are in additive man- ufacturing, electronics manufacturing, distance learning, and STEM education. Dr. Fidan is a member and active participant of SME, ASEE, ABET, ASME, and IEEE. He is also the Associate Editor of IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing
AC 2009-1982: MASTERY PROJECTS IN THE UNDERGRADUATE ROBOTSTUDY TEAM: A CASE STUDYDavid Ahlgren, Trinity College David J. Ahlgren is Karl W. Hallden Professor of Engineering at Trinity College. He holds the B.S. from Trinity College, M.S. from Tulane University, and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. His professional interests include semiconductor electronics, simulation and modeling, and educational robotics.Igor Verner, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology Igor M. Verner is Associate Professor at the Department of Education in Technology and Science, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology. He received the M.S. degree in Mathematics from the
), espoused by theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) [5], has required manyengineering education professionals to consider the detailed articulation of educational objectivesand their assessment for the first time. Accordingly, a number of seminars and symposia havebeen developed to address these issues [6]. After some six years, many engineering educationalprofessionals still have many questions concerning educational objectives and their assessment;in many cases because they are unaware of the work of, for example, Bloom [7], Krathwohl [8],Harrow [9], and Mager [10,11].Educational objectives, and methods for their assessment, have been around for many years.Many of our so-called objectives are, in reality, goals and, as such
Industrial Engineering in 2001 and is currently a member of the full time faculty as an Assistant Professor. She is the course coordinator and one of the lecturers of the “Ethics in Engineering” course offered to student’s studying engineering. In May 2003 Dr. Atasoylu was appointed Vice Dean for the Faculty of Engineering. She is on the board of directors of the Research Center for Water and Marine Sciences at EMU since November 2002, on the board of directors of the Advanced Technology Research and Development Institute since December 2004 and an Advisory Board member of the EMU Continuing Education Center since September 2004. She is also an active member of several committees
Veterinary Medicine degree from Cornell University as well as a Bachelor of Arts in Elementary Education from the College of Santa Fe.Dr. Glenda R. Scales, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Glenda Scales serves as both Associate Dean for Global Engagement and Chief Technology Officer in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech. In this dual role she serves as Executive Director of Virginia Tech’s Academy for Global Engineering, as well as the Director of Engineering Online. In 2020, U.S. News and World Report ranked this online graduate program #10 in the nation. Additionally, she provides leadership at the state level and at Virginia Tech for Cardinal Education. This state-wide distance learning
StudentsIntroductionIncreasing achievement of underrepresented students in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) is a critical and difficult task [1]. Underrepresented students make up asmall fraction of the STEM workforce (13%) compared to white students (71%) [1]. Mentorship,particularly research mentorship, plays an important role in the development of scientific identity[2] and improves students’ moral, performance, and retention rates [3]. Therefore, mentoringunderrepresented students in research is critical for increasing their achievement. Students whoreceive research mentoring have described mentors as colleagues who provided them anopportunity to flourish. These students were more likely to identify as scientists, whereas thosewho did not
from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and her M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. Her current engineering education research interests include engineering students’ understanding of ethics and social responsibility, sociotechnical education, and assessment of engineering pedagogies.Jon A. Leydens (Professor) Dr. Jon A. Leydens is a Professor of Engineering Education Research in the Division of Humanities, Arts, & Social Sciences at the Colorado School of Mines. Dr. Leydens’ research interests are focused on three areas of engineering education: social justice, sustainable community development, and communication.Jenifer Blacklock (Director of the Western Colorado University PartnershipProgram) Dr