has a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech and received a Master’s of Civil Engineering and an Ed.D. in Technology Education from N.C. State University. He specializes in developing and integrating project-based activities into the K-12 classroom that incorporate engineering and STEM learning concepts as well as providing professional development for K-12 teachers.Dr. Frank M. Bowman, University of North Dakota Dr. Frank Bowman is Associate Professor, Tom Owens Fellow, and Associate Chair in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of North Dakota. He holds a Ph.D. from the California Institute of Technology and a B.S from Brigham Young University, both in Chemical Engineering. His research
ISU he worked in the Smart Home Lab researching topics in Software Engineering, Smart Homes, Pervasive Computing, Formal Methods, and Wireless Sensors. He published several papers and completed his dissertation entitled ”A framework for safe composition of heterogeneous SOA services in a pervasive computing environment with resource constraints”. In ISU he was also involved in several other activities like organizing the GMAP Symposium, participating in student organizations, and working as research assistant. After graduation he worked for a trading software company in New York City but once again his love for academics brought him back, this time as a professor in Computer Engineering Technology at CUNY - New
undergraduate student from the New York City College of Technology. Her major is in mechanical engineering technology. Her interest is in mechanical design, mechatronics and computer aided design.Ehab A. Ahmad, Mr. Ahmed is an undergraduate student at New York City College of Technology. He is pursuing a degree in mechanical engineering technology. He has technical skills in mechanical design, computer aided design, and product rapid prototyping.Mr. Ali Harb, New York City College of Technology Ali Harb Computer Integrated Manufacturing teacher at Brooklyn Technical High School and College Laboratory Technician at New York city College of Technology. I am experienced in robotics, design, and fabrication. I coach and
Paper ID #21663Global Engineering Competency: Assessment Tools and Training StrategiesProf. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies
Theodori, Johns Hopkins University Whiting School of Engineeering Ms. Theodori is a Program Coordinator for the Johns Hopkins University Whiting School of Engineer- ing’s Technical Management, Engineering Management and Space Systems Engineering. She also has developed online and blended classroom courses for the program and lectures in Information Research and Advanced Technology. Ms. Theodori is a Principal Staff member at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory working in information management, policy and communication. Judith re- ceived her Bachelor’s in Labor Relations from San Francisco State University in 1983, and her Masters in Library Science from Queens College in 1998.Dr. James D Beaty
. degree from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India in 1987 and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Michigan State University, East Lansing, in 1990 and 1993 respectively. From 1995 to 1999 she was with the Mixed-Signal Design Group at LSI Logic Corporation, Milpitas, CA where she worked on high-speed data communication IC design and testing.Dr. Tonya Lynn Nilsson P.E., Santa Clara University Tonya Nilsson is a Lecturer in Civil Engineering at Santa Clara University (SCU), where she is also one of six Faculty Associates in their Collaborative for Teaching Innovation. Prior to joining SCU, Tonya was an Associate Professor at CSU - Chico
Health Engineering in the Depart- ment of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering and the Director of the Center for Research in Water Resources at the University of Texas in Austin. Dr. Reible holds a Ph.D. in Chemical Engi- neering from the California Institute of Technology, and is a Board Certified Environmental Engineer, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #28764 a Professional Engineer (Louisiana), and was elected to the National Academy of Engineering in 2005 for the ”development of widely used approaches for the management of contaminated sediments”. His
AbstractOften, engineering departments are faced with the need to update laboratory exercises andequipment. However, adequate funds do not always exist to accomplish these upgrades in atimely manner. Another challenge faced by departments are satisfying Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) requirements for a major design experience within thecurriculum. ABET guidelines state, “Students must be prepared for engineering practice throughthe curriculum culminating in a major design experience based on the knowledge and skillsacquired in earlier course work and incorporating engineering standards and realistic constraintsthat include most of the following considerations: economic; environmental; sustainability;manufacturability; ethical
models, synthesis techniques and engineering principles governing the technology in their project. By insisting that the ECE Design I proposals explore and identify the models and engineering principles involved, the temptation of "cut-and-try" designing can possibly be diverted and at best completely avoided. This proposal is strong enough to effectively avoid inappropriate "cut-and-try" designing. (encircle choice) (emphatically disagree) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (emphatically agree) E) Project's scope; (too simple) (just right) (too ambitious) (encircle choice) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 F) Project's effect on student's ability to use engineering
,learning to think critically allows students to make up their own minds. Conventional engineering Page 8.918.5education, by not questioning any application of technology, creates a values vacuum in whichProceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Session 2692everything is sanctioned, or nothing, so that students have no basis for decision-making.Applying Liberative Pedagogies in the Engineering Classroom
AC 2011-1837: EVOLVING IDENTITIES: UNDERGRADUATE WOMENPURSUING THE ENGINEERING PROFESSORIATESarah Hug, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Sarah Hug is Research Associate at the Alliance for Technology, Learning, and Society (ATLAS) Institute, University of Colorado at Boulder. Dr. Hug earned her PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Her research and evaluation efforts focus on learning science, tech- nology, engineering, and mathematics, with a special interest in communities of practice, creativity, and experiences of underrepresented groups in these fields across multiple contexts.A. Susan Jurow, University of Colorado at Boulder A. Susan Jurow is an Assistant Professor and Co
. Evidence that the students incorporated sustainability into theirconcept of civil engineering was also collected based on other course assignments. There issome evidence that female and minority students may be more likely to articulate the importanceof sustainability in the context of civil engineering, although more research is needed on thistopic due to the small numbers of female students in the class.BackgroundAll engineers should be familiar with the concept of sustainability. ABET lists sustainability asone of the constraints for engineering designs under Criterion 3 Program Outcome C.1 TheNational Academy of Engineering’s (NAE) The Engineer of 2020 report notes “Engineeringpractices must incorporate attention to sustainable technology, and
Institutional Diversity. She received the Harold R. Johnson Diversity Service Award (2015), and the Sarah Goddard Power Award (2012), from the University of Michigan for her work on diversity-related issues.Lorelle A Meadows (Founding Dean of Pavlis Honors College) Dr. Lorelle Meadows joined Michigan Technological University in 2014 where, as founding dean, she led the creation of a new honors college uniquely committed to inclusion and equity and eliminating barriers to high impact educational practices. Dr. Meadows received her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Oceanic Science from the University of Michigan, College of Engineering. As an educator and administrator in higher education, she conducts interdisciplinary research at the
AC 2011-2162: RET PROJECT IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURINGLisa Denny Choate, Cannon County High School Lisa D. Choate is a mathematics teacher at Cannon County High School in Woodbury, Tennessee. She teaches Algebra One, Honors Algebra Two and Geometry.Kenan Hatipoglu, Tennessee Technological University Kenan Hatipoglu is a graduate research assistant at Center for Manufacturing Research and Ph.D. student at Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Tennessee Tech University, Cookeville, Tennessee. His research interests are in power system design and smart grid applications.Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technological University Dr. Ismail Fidan is a faculty member at the college of engineering of Tennessee Tech
Paper ID #17818Development of a Laboratory Module in 3D PrintingDr. Spencer Seung-hyun Kim, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Dr. Spencer Kim is an Associate Professor in Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Technology Department (MMET) at RIT, and serves as Associate Director of American Packaging Corporation Cen- ter for Packaging Innovation at RIT. He previously worked in the semiconductor industry. Dr. Kim, as a PI or Co-PI, received grants and sponsorship from NSF, SME, SPE, universities, and industries. In 2009 and 2013, he was nominated for the Eisenhart Award for Outstanding Teaching, RIT’s premiere teach
), espoused by theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) [5], has required manyengineering education professionals to consider the detailed articulation of educational objectivesand their assessment for the first time. Accordingly, a number of seminars and symposia havebeen developed to address these issues [6]. After some six years, many engineering educationalprofessionals still have many questions concerning educational objectives and their assessment;in many cases because they are unaware of the work of, for example, Bloom [7], Krathwohl [8],Harrow [9], and Mager [10,11].Educational objectives, and methods for their assessment, have been around for many years.Many of our so-called objectives are, in reality, goals and, as such
Veterinary Medicine degree from Cornell University as well as a Bachelor of Arts in Elementary Education from the College of Santa Fe.Dr. Glenda R. Scales, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Glenda Scales serves as both Associate Dean for Global Engagement and Chief Technology Officer in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech. In this dual role she serves as Executive Director of Virginia Tech’s Academy for Global Engineering, as well as the Director of Engineering Online. In 2020, U.S. News and World Report ranked this online graduate program #10 in the nation. Additionally, she provides leadership at the state level and at Virginia Tech for Cardinal Education. This state-wide distance learning
StudentsIntroductionIncreasing achievement of underrepresented students in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) is a critical and difficult task [1]. Underrepresented students make up asmall fraction of the STEM workforce (13%) compared to white students (71%) [1]. Mentorship,particularly research mentorship, plays an important role in the development of scientific identity[2] and improves students’ moral, performance, and retention rates [3]. Therefore, mentoringunderrepresented students in research is critical for increasing their achievement. Students whoreceive research mentoring have described mentors as colleagues who provided them anopportunity to flourish. These students were more likely to identify as scientists, whereas thosewho did not
from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and her M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. Her current engineering education research interests include engineering students’ understanding of ethics and social responsibility, sociotechnical education, and assessment of engineering pedagogies.Jon A. Leydens (Professor) Dr. Jon A. Leydens is a Professor of Engineering Education Research in the Division of Humanities, Arts, & Social Sciences at the Colorado School of Mines. Dr. Leydens’ research interests are focused on three areas of engineering education: social justice, sustainable community development, and communication.Jenifer Blacklock (Director of the Western Colorado University PartnershipProgram) Dr
classroom and laboratory curricula including online course platforms, and integrated technologies. She has been involved in both private and government grants as author and project director, and is currently PI of an NSF ATE grant, ”Increasing the Number of Engineering Technicians in Southeastern Pennsylvania.” A major goal of this collaborative effort with Drexel University is to connect for-credit, occupational technician education to workforce development certification programs. She was the faculty advisor to two student teams that made the final round of the NSF AACC Community College Innovation Challenge (CCIC) in 2016 and 2017. She and her students have been involved in STEM related outreach to local community
AC 2007-2603: LEARNING THROUGH WORK STUDY OPPORTUNITIES INCIVIL ENGINEERINGSubhi Bazlamit, Ohio Northern University Subhi M Bazlamit is a Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Ohio Northern University. Dr. Bazlamit is the Director of Pavement management Center for Cities Counties and Villages (PMC-CCV)Farhad Reza, Ohio Northern University Farhad Reza is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Ohio Northern University. Dr. Reza's research interests include pavement management,design and maintenance. Page 12.1012.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007
Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Quality engineering education for the Arab states regionAbstractReform in engineering education is needed in all parts of the world, as universitiesprepare graduates to enter the profession of engineering which has been transformed bymassive technological developments and by globalization of all aspects of concern toengineers. Engineering educators in the Arab states region face particular challenges inaddition to those facing similar educators in other parts of the world: tailoring programsto fill the needs of countries that are undergoing rapid modernization, providing access totheir education programs for segments of their societies that may not have had it in thepast, offering programs
AC 2009-728: CULTURAL INTELLIGENCE: ENGINEERING SUCCESS FOR AFLAT WORLDRichard Gash, United States Military AcademyStephen Ressler, United States Military AcademyEric Crispino, United States Military Academy Page 14.390.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Cultural Intelligence: Engineering Success for a Flat WorldAbstract The civil engineers we educate today will enter a truly global work force. Globalization,resultant from a proliferation of information technology, has increased the likely hood that civilengineers will find themselves working in cross-cultural situations. Success in suchenvironments will require, in addition to classical
field. Like in manyengineering courses there are laboratory experiments and design assignments. Some innovative compo-nents of this effort are the collaborative approach to teaching (engineer + architect), the use of televisedlaboratory experiments (as opposed to live demonstration labs) and the use of information technologies forfaculty-student interaction (fax, voice mail and electronic mail). The course is broadcast twice a week(three hours each time) for 12 weeks. Students in the region may watch the lectures at the broadcast time orthey may record them for future viewing. Students living outside the broadcast area subscribe to a systemthat delivers the videotapes by regular mail every week. The course has been offered for three terms and
2006-172: A WEB ENABLED STUDY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGBenson Tongue, University of California-Berkeley Benson Tongue is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. He received his MS from Stanford University and his BSE, MA, and PhD from Princeton University. He taught from 1983-1988 at the Georgia Institute of Technology and has been at Berkeley since 1988.Eric Lew, University of California-Berkeley Eric Lew is an undergraduate student, majoring in Mechanical Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. His projected graduation date is May 2007
2006-588: GROWTH OF A YOUNG ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PROGRAMYesim Sireli, University of North Carolina-Charlotte Yesim Sireli is an Assistant Professor at the Engineering Management Program at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She received a Ph.D. degree in Engineering Management from Old Dominion University, and also holds MSc and BSc degrees in Electrical Engineering. Her research interests include business forecasting, decision analysis, customer-oriented product development, quality management, and technology management.S. Gary Teng, University of North Carolina-Charlotte S. Gary Teng is the Director of Engineering Management Program and Center for Lean Logistics and
design, 4) increasedinterest in pursuing an engineering career, and 5) improved technological literacy [4]. With thesegoals in mind, the objective of this study was to examine how a newly developed instructionalmodel, known as Argument Driven Engineering (ADE), is related to changes in middle schoolstudents’ attitudes toward engineering and participation in engineering careers. This study ofengineering attitudes is important both for developing effective curriculum and pedagogy forengineering in science classrooms, and also for addressing nation-wide problems with diverserepresentation and participation in engineering degree programs and occupations.In 2012 the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology issued a reportprojecting
engineers!” in Undergraduate Mathematics Teaching Conference, N. GOrdon, Ed. Birmingham, AL: University of Birmingham, 2001, pp. 32–40.[14] J. A. Czocher, J. Tague, and G. Baker, “Where does the calculus go? An investigation of how calculus ideas are used later in coursework,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 673–684, 2013.[15] J. Flegg, D. Mallet, and M. Lupton, “Students’ perceptions of the relevance of mathematics in engineering,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 717–732, 2012.
and its implications for minority students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8):810–834, October 2004.[22] Carol J. Burger, Joseph A. Raelin, Rachelle M. Reisberg, Margaret B. Bailey, and David Whitman. Self- efficacy in female and male undergraduate engineering students: Comparision among four institutions. In ASEE Southest Section Conference, 2010.[23] Ronald J. Burke. Women and minorities in stem: a primer. In Ronald J. Burke and Mary C. Mattis, editors, Women and Minorities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, chapter 1, pages 3–26. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2007.[24] Kelly Cannon, Monica Anderson LaPoint, Nate Bird, Katie Panciera, Harini Veeraraghavan, Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos
technological determinism [e.g., 28] and perceptions of engineering expertise [e.g., 29], andexplore the relationship between engineering work and a broader service to society [e.g., 30].In fall 2015, semester-long, group based design challenges around food and sustainability weredesigned to offer students opportunities to experientially ground their developing conceptualunderstandings. More specifically, student teams investigated the broad challenge in specificlocal contexts with a focus on technical, social, cultural and economic factors. Workshopelements over the semester prepared students to engage in observations of the local context andengage with stakeholders to develop and represent a coherent understanding of the chosencontext and system