AC 2011-107: MACROERGONOMIC ANALYSIS OF INSTRUCTIONALTECHNOLOGY ADOPTION: A CASE STUDY ON TABLET PC ADOP-TIONLeanna M. Horton, Virginia Tech Leanna Horton is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Industrial and Systems Engineering Department at Virginia Tech and is a member of the Industrial Ergonomics and Biomechanics Laboratory. Her research is focused on the effects of job rotation on muscle fatigue and performance.Kahyun Kim, Virginia Tech Kahyun Kim is a graduate student currently pursuing Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech with a concentration on human factors and ergonomics. Her research interest is in the impact of various factors on team collaboration and effectiveness as well as team
teachingbackground. Throughout his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, he held teaching assistantships in the departments of mechanical engineering, electricalengineering, and mathematics. His primary duties were highly interactive, and includedlecturing, supervising and guiding students in laboratory settings, and guiding discussionsessions. Courses he was either solely or jointly responsible for included pre-calculus algebra,vibrations, acoustics, electrical communications, and instrumentation. During his tenure as afaculty in mechanical engineering at Purdue University, he taught a variety of courses in thesystems, instrumentation and controls division. He also developed and taught two cross-listedgraduate courses. One
teachers in sufficient quality and quantity to meet currentdemands[5]. Recent graduates enter the mathematics teaching profession already indesperate need of intensive professional development[6]. Moreover, state and districtefforts to recruit and retain teachers too often fail to benefit high-poverty, high-minority,and low achieving schools where inexperienced and out-of-field teachers are more likely[7] . Consequently, efforts toward professional development of the current teacherworkforce hold the greatest promise for improved achievement.Fortunately, NCLB facilitates partnerships between K-12 districts and higher educationinstitutions to provide teachers with professional development opportunities including
devise implementation plans for theirown classrooms. During the second week, each teacher was invited to bring two students toparticipate in a teaching laboratory, with the teachers teaching the modules in a highly supportedenvironment, surrounded by SENSE IT staff (see Figure 4). This opportunity to implement thematerials with students gave the teachers an opportunity to review the materials again and to seehow they worked with students. They found this a very effective approach, both in terms of theamount of additional time they were able to spend with the curriculum and in terms of howseeing their own students work through the modules increased their own confidence in theirability to teach the SENSE IT modules to entire classes.The
of network professionals.References[1] E. Lampi, “The Effectiveness of using Virtual Laboratories to Teach Computer NetworkingSkills in Zambia,” Ph.D dissertation, Career and Technical Education, Virginia PolytechnicInstitute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA, 2013. [Online]. Available:https://www.proquest.com/docview/1512636920[2] J. Allison, “Simulation-based learning via Cisco Packet Tracer to enhance the teaching ofcomputer networks,” Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology inComputer Science Education Vol. 1, Jul. 2022. doi:10.1145/3502718.3524739[3] S. Asadi, J. Allison, M. Khurana, and M. Nilashi, “Simulation-based learning for computerand networking teaching: A systematic literature review and
on experimental thermal hydraulics, and completed his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering at West Texas A&M University.Xi Zhao, Texas A&M University Xi Zhao is a holder of Associate and Practitioner Certificates from the Center for the Integration of Re- search, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL), which is dedicated to improving the teaching of STEM disci- plines in higher education. Ms. Zhao received a Bachelor of Engineering in Architecture and Master of Architecture. She is currently working on her doctorate in the field of building science, engineering, and design at Texas A&M University. Her research is partially supported by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers
learning and robotics together withthe specific machine learning and robotics applications in autonomous systems, the first author hasexplored the Machine Learning Course and Robotics Course currently available in differentUniversities [1-7]. Especially, during her 8 weeks summer visiting at Stanford University, shealso had a chance to explore resources to integrate into the course. Based upon all these works, shesuccessfully adapted/developed course EGR 391- Intermediate Research Topic Course to aResearch-based Course on Machine Learning and Robotics by combining teaching, research,and engagement. This course is especially designed for the team of junior undergraduate studentswho are participating in the NSF EIR and NASA ULI projects.The
, partnered with awheeled Pelican case and 250 grams of filament. A LibGuide provided instructionalmaterials. These circulating printers empowered students to explore 3D printing andtroubleshooting outside the library, in their own space and timeframe. Taking studentengagement to the next level, the librarians also developed and taught a 1-credit honorscourse where students worked in groups to build 3D printers. The course facilitated adeeper understanding of 3D technology through assembling 3D printers from kits,thereby teaching students the basic mechanics of 3D technology and use of tools. Thecourse had a small cohort of twelve students, split into four teams of three, who builtiMade3D Jellybox kits in a weekly class held within the engineering
Molecular and Multiscale Methods Laboratory (M5 Lab) at CMU, which focuses on computational micro- and nanoscale mechanics of fluids, soft matter, and active matter, with applications in Civil and Environmental Engineering across the nexus of water, energy, sustainable materials, and urban livability. The M5 Lab is particularly interested in particle-based simulations, systems out of equilibrium, uncertainty quantification in particle-based simulations, and high-performance computing. He teaches courses in molecular simulation and computational/data science. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Fishers
Paper ID #37327Development of an Introductory Nuclear Engineering Coursefor Non-MajorsIra Harkness (Instructional Assistant Professor) Ira Harkness is an instructional assistant professor in the Nuclear Engineering Program within the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Florida. He teaches courses on radiation detection, radiation interactions, and risk assessment for nuclear systems. His engineering education research interests include game-based learning and the use of technology in education. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
and Aerospace Engineering and founding PI of the MERGE ((MEchanical engineeRing desiGn pEdagogy) Lab focusing his research and teaching efforts on Capstone Design, Design for Manufacturing, and developing hands-on manufacturing courses. Sean advises UF's Formula SAE team (Gator Motorsports) and co-advises the UF Rocket Team (Swamp Launch). Sean has worked in industrial maintenance and aerospace, with his graduate work studying soft matter engineering, 3D bio-printing, and biotribology. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Continuous Improvement of an Experiential Learning Manufacturing Lab
(COSE), Center for Equityand Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CEETL), Center of Science and Math Education(CSME) as well as the Science Education Partnership and Assessment Laboratory (SEPAL), acommunity of scientists that conducts research on effective science education and providesresources to science teachers.ConclusionAny funded education initiative that wishes to have a long term, positive impact on a universitycampus must put forth significant effort to ensure that its core tenets are sufficiently embedded inthe university and academic department culture. To accomplish this, it is often necessary to seekfurther funding to continue work towards institutionalization of program components beyond theinitial support period. This case study
, and a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Carnegie Mellon University, USA. She joined Pur- due University Northwest in 1994 after three years of industrial experience. Dr. Zhou has more than 38 years of experience in the areas of computational fluid dynamics (CFD), combustion, energy, multiphase reacting flows, and air pollution control. She is on the cutting edge in the integration of computer simu- lation and virtual reality visualization for solving real world problems. Dr. Zhou has conducted a large number of funded research projects totaling over $25 million and collaborated with many experts from over 140 organizations including academia, K-12 schools, national laboratories, and various industries (e.g
methods to solve the system ofnonlinear differential equations that govern fluid flow and heat transfer, with some initial andboundary conditions. However, due to the limited computational resources available for classroominstruction, the problems used for illustration and laboratory assignments are limited to simplecanonical types. This means that students will not be able to analyze realistic problems withpractical applications, which are inherently complicated, computationally expensive, and requirehigh-performance computing (HPC) clusters that take advantage of massive parallelization. In thispaper, a course in the curriculum that addresses this issue is proposed. In this course, thefundamental theories of high-performance computing will
good example of this occurred at the University of Tennessee in the late 1990s [3]. At theUniversity of Tennessee [3] the two first-year courses were redesigned in response torecommendations of an industrial advisory board and ABET. The result was a FYE programwhich was deemed the “Engage Program”. The first semester course was a non-calculus-basedapproach that focused on computer programming, graphic skills, and problem solving. Thesecond semester course focused more on calculus-based content with emphasis on statics anddynamics. Basic concepts would be presented in a one-hour lecture and the concepts werereinforced during low-tech, hands-on laboratory exercises. Additionally, students would meetwith graduate teaching assistants in a
Paper ID #34262Middle School Capstone Engineering Projects (Work in Progress)Dr. Kenneth Berry, Southern Methodist University Dr. Kenneth Berry is a Research Professor at the Caruth Institute for Engineering Education (CIEE) in the Lyle School of Engineering at Southern Methodist University (SMU). He has worked as an education specialist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory until he received his doctorate in Educational Technology in 2001. He then taught at the Michael D. Eisner School of Education at California State University at Northridge (CSUN). In 2009, he moved to Texas to work at the Science and Engineering Education
, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based
projects funded by the US Department of Education. He has extensive international experience working on technical training and engineering education projects funded by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and U.S. Department of Labor, USAID. Countries where he has worked include Armenia, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, China, Egypt, Macedo- nia, Poland, Romania, and Thailand.Dr. R. Ryan Dupont, Utah State University Dr. Dupont has more than 35 years of experience teaching and conducting applied and basic research in environmental engineering at the Utah Water Research Laboratory at Utah State University. His main research areas have addressed soil and groundwater bioremediation, stormwater management via green
Assistant Professor of Surgery and Bioengineering at The Pennsylvania State University in Hershey, PA. He also worked for CarboMedics Inc. in Austin, TX, in the research and development of prosthetic heart valves. Dr. Zapanta’s primary teaching responsibilities are Biomedical Engineering Laboratory and Design. Ad- ditional teaching interests include medical device design education and professional issues in biomedical engineering. Dr. Zapanta’s research interests are in developing medical devices to treat cardiovascular disease, focusing on the areas of cardiac assist devices and prosthetic heart valves. Dr. Zapanta is an active member in the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, American Society of
Paper ID #31939Exploring the correlation between students reported self-efficacy andretentionMr. Joseph Dygert, West Virginia University Ph.D student in aerospace engineering at West Virginia UniversityDr. Melissa Lynn Morris, University of Nevada - Las Vegas Melissa Morris is currently an Assistant Professor in Residence in the Mechanical Engineering Depart- ment at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. She previously served as a Teaching Associate Professor for the Freshman Engineering Program, in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Min- eral Resources at West Virginia University (WVU). She graduated Summa
Paper ID #32084Three Years After Rollout: A Report on Systemic Changes in a First-YearEngineering ProgramDr. Amy J. Hamlin, Michigan Technological University AJ Hamlin is a Principle Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Tech- nological University, where she teaches first-year engineering courses. Her research interests include engineering ethics, spatial visualization, and educational methods. She is an active member in the Mul- tidisciplinary Engineering and the Engineering Design Graphics Divisions of ASEE. For the Multidisi- plinary Division she has served as the Secretary/Treasurer and
, CO, USA) in 2018. There she gained experience working as a graduate teaching assistant for computer-aided engineering, biomedical engi- neering capstone design, and biomedical engineering introductory classes. She also served as a Graduate Teaching Fellow for the College of Engineering during the 2016/2017 academic year. Nicole then com- pleted a two-year instructional post-doctoral fellowship with Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad in the Transforming Engineering Education Laboratory within the Biomedical Engineering Department at the University of Michigan. Through this fellowship, she spent the 2019/2020 academic year working with Shantou Uni- versity (Guangdong Province, China), teaching in their new BME program and
State University since September 2019, where she works to assist student learning in undergraduate dynamics classes and participates in research to improve student understanding of complex dynamics concepts.Maggie Nevrly, Cal Poly SLO Mechanical Engineering student interested in engineering education and social justice.Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal
“Parallel Triples.” As a professor who gives lectures and creates laboratory assignments inelectronics fundamentals, I will now be able to use this research to create “unmessy” parallelresistor examples with standard values that, unlike the formula 6Ω || 3Ω = 2Ω , will not cause mystudents to assume that the parallel resistance formula can simply be replaced with division.References1 Evelyn B. Christensen, “Pythagorean Triples Served for Supper,” Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Sept. 1997, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 60-62.2 Tony Atherton, “A History of Ohm’s Law,” Electronics and Power, June 1986, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 467-471.3 Aziz S. Inan, “What did Gustav Robert Kirchhoff
pounds). It’s anticipated that 39,030 pounds ofCarbon Dioxide will be saved every year. On average, around 2,615 trees would be required tooffset this early emission8.The disciplines of engineering and technology have a long history of adapting to the needs ofindustry and society so that they remain relevant over time. Thus, to help fill this currenteducational gap, teaching resources and a subsequent plan of action are necessary components tosuccessful integration of renewable energy concepts into mainstream engineering and technologycurricula. The purpose of this work is to incorporate renewable energy into engineeringtechnology courses at Georgia Southern University (GSU) making use of a recently acquired asolar power generation station. The
in each semester of the four year programs in civil, chemical and environmental engineering. He has consulted on PBL to several Universities, nationally and internationally. Roger has been a member of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE) Executive since 2001 and is its President in 2008. In February 2007, Roger was appointed at the University of Melbourne as Director of the Engineering Learning Unit to assist in the introduction of the new Melbourne Model in engineering, to support new project-based learning courses and new learning spaces and to improve teaching quality across the School of Engineering
covered. Other courses are beingexamined to determine if a similar active learning style could be applied. Many of theengineering and engineering technology courses utilize a hands-on laboratory approach but thelectures are conducted in the traditional way. They may be good candidates for the activelearning approach as well.Bibliography1. Allen, R. H. (2002). Impact teaching: Ideas and strategies for teachers to maximize student learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.2. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). Washington, DC: George Washington University.3. Crabtree, D. E. (1972). An introduction to flintworking. Occasional Papers No. 28
or laboratory, targeted violence against a professor • Research risks (loss of research data or specimens, misuse of grant money, data fabrication, plagiarism, failed collaborations) • Other risks: email privacy risks (non-university accounts), unfair student discipline, discrimination, plagiarism, embezzlement, tenure denial complications and lawsuits, loss of computer data, field trip accidents, suicide, etc.Operationally, Ann Franke advises to take a broad view of what could go wrong, focus on smallsteps for improvement, get help, follow up, adjust and stick with it for the long term.Though not focused on college teaching, Dunklee et al in "A Primer for School RiskManagement" identify the following relevant
. Also, many newlearners do not realize that copying and pasting other work, especially from online sources, isplagiarizing. An article by Brothers displays a pyramid chart, which is the result of a study byNational Testing Laboratories in Bethel, Maine (p. 78).9 The learning pyramid chart in thatarticle reveals the average retention rate for various methods of teaching and retention. Lectureretention is about 5% and reading about 10%. Creating an atmosphere of collaboration,participation, and learning-by-doing increases learning retention up to 50%, according toBrothers. Many learners come to class, sit and put in their time. Teachers must help studentsunderstand that attendance is a good start, but it not enough to justify a grade showing
the fatigue tester in teaching fatigue concepts to undergraduate students.Assessment, Evaluation and ImprovementThe evaluation plan is separated into two categories. The first category evaluates the design andperformance of the completed fatigue tester against the stated capabilities. The secondevaluation category measures the effectiveness of the completed system (fatigue tester +laboratory exercises) as a tool for enhanced student learning. Page 11.684.101. Fatigue tester design and performance.Several progress evaluations are planned. First, as particular subassemblies are completed, eachwill be measured for its ability to