-interview is conducted with the participant. Pre-determined questions focus on their driving experience, their assessment of aspects of thedriving interaction and interface, and their recollection of various aspects of the drive-along experience and their response.These research procedures are minimally risky, they are driving their personally ownedvehicle, on quiet campus roads or parking lots, and riding a car with “trained” passengersas researchers. Two elements outline ethical consideration in the study:a. Audio and video recording occurred. The recordings were used to code participantbehavior, to examine and transcribe interactions with the existing automation.Additionally, videos may be shown for educational purposes, in classrooms, labs
of Engineering in the New Century.9 In this report, the NAS identifies key attributesthat engineers in the 21st century are expected to exhibit to ensure their success and the successof the engineering profession. The key attributes are listed as: strong analytical skills,practical ingenuity, creativity, communication, business and management, leadership,high ethical standards, professionalism, dynamism, agility, resilience, and flexibility, andbecoming lifelong learners. The NAS also prepared reports entitled The Engineer of 2010,Rising Above the Gathering Storm, and Examination of the U.S. Air Force’s Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Workforce Needs in the Future and Its Strategy toMeet Those Needs.9-13 One statement is
]. However, there is some evidence to suggest that ambassadormembership does benefit the undergraduate students and their burgeoning sense of themselves asprofessionals, which involves a commitment to serving “the public with specialized knowledgeand skills through commitment to the field’s public purposes and ethical standards” [7]. Forexample, Anagnos and colleagues [8] surveyed students in two such programs and found reportedbenefits including exploration of career goals, a sense of belonging to the engineeringcommunity, and a perception that they were making a difference in the lives of others. In engineering, it may be argued that individuals from minority groups (women,individuals of color) benefit especially from professional
needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability”72. A thorough understanding and mastery of the design process is necessary tosolve these difficult challenges; however, one of the most critical stages of the design process,prototyping, has remained largely unstructured and unstudied. This work evaluated the impact onprototyping awareness of a guided prototyping framework. Future work will explore how PFXmay help engineering students test and iterate on designs faster and more effectively. Finally, our work aligns with the National Science Foundation’s second strategic goal “stimulateinnovation and address societal needs through research
life; thus, making this assignment a highly authentic assessment option due tothe personal nature of the question being asked; hence, there is no boilerplate answer that can befound online. Lastly, when in the lab, Lab Instructors reminded students about ethical and moralconduct when completing peer reviews for each assignment.In support of learning, students were given (a) a full lecture surrounding digital literacy, (b) alecture on the importance of citation when reporting research, (c) online APA references forexploration and review, (d) the option to take a Basic Library Training module for extra creditcompletion, and (e) were asked to conduct APA style and format guideline information researchoutside of class. Within the directions of the
. M. (August 13, 2015). STEM degrees are not earned by math alone. Diverse Education, p. 28.[33] Ramsey, K. and Baethe, B. (2013). The keys to future STEM careers: Basic skills, critical thinking, and ethics. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 80(1), pp. 26-33.[34] http://www.blackboard.com/, accessed 01.31.16.[35] Larkin, T. L. (2014). The student conference: A model of authentic assessment. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 4(Special Issue 2), pp. 36 – 46. Kassel University Press GmbH, Kassel, Germany. eISSN: 2192-4880. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i2.3445.
. Topics covered the same in both sections (using Active Lecture techniques) Equivalent Force Introduction Couples 3D moments Centroid Systems 3D Equilibrium Trusses Frames Ethics Friction Topics that used flipped lessons for sections A,B,D & E Parallel-Axis 2D Support Vector Review 3D Vectors Machines Theorem Reactions
sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Sharon A. Jones P.E., University of Portland Sharon Jones is the Dean of the Shiley School of Engineering at the University of Portland. She is a licensed civil engineer with degrees from Columbia University, the University of Florida, and Carnegie Mellon University. Her research interests focus on applying decision-making methods to evaluate sustain- ability policies with emphases on infrastructure, developing economies, and particular industrial sectors. She is also interested in engineering pedagogy
experiment results, that do not “make sense”. (6)9. …relating laboratory work to the bigger picture and recognizing the applicability of scientific prin- ciples to specific real world problems in order to solve them creatively. (7)/(13)10. .…choosing, operating and modifying engineering equipment. (8)11. …handling technological risks and engineering practices in responsible way. (9)12. …presenting experimentation results to technical and non-technical audiences in written form. (10)13. …presenting experimentation results to technical and non-technical audiences in oral form. (10)14. …working effectively in a team. (11)15. …applying professional ethical standards in terms of objectivity and honesty
, material selection, engineering standards, projectplanning and ethics, as well as the engineering practices of analysis and experimentation (tocollect data for making design decisions). While these objectives span each of the three designprocess steps, the deliverables are only assigned (and retained for assessment purposes) atspecific stages of the design process. The deliverables include physical artifacts of concepts,prototypes, and final designs, as well as oral and written reports. The collected portfolio is arecord of the design process. Figure 5. Demonstration of Proficiency within Capstone DesignAs examples of the scope of projects pursued, students have designed and constructed amotorcycle-powered dynamometer (and the
be used in real world. The PBL is used to preparestudents with skills such as leadership, team building, ethical behavior, creativity, criticalthinking, problem solving, and entrepreneurial skills.4 PBL has been implemented as part of thecurriculum5 or as a replacement of traditional classroom.6 There has been study where it hasbeen applied in multiple universities simultaneously where students from different degrees weregiven PBL based materials science course.7 For the specific field of materials sciences, PBL hasbeen implemented mostly for sophomores, juniors but rarely in a freshman classroom. In anincreasingly complex modern world, engineers are regularly challenged both technically as wellas socially to solve multifaceted problems
broad categories for these competencies. For example, as outlined inFurco and Billig’s Service-Learning: The Essence of Pedagogy11, some learning non-academicoutcomes that are intrinsic to the service-learning philosophy fall within these domains:vocational (career); personal; civic and cultural; ethical; and, social. For a more thoroughelaboration of these domains, the reader is directed toward the original source. Other key components driving the decisions behind the project selection in a service-learning context are the resources available and student capacities to meaningful engage in theproposed projects. Resources refer to the institutional, community, financial, and materialresources and support available to a service-learning
thesesponsors, especially those in the local region attend senior design classes to observe the progressof their sponsored teams, providing guidance and feedback at every stage of the project. Teamsoften visit the industries and observe the existing process or product they are trying to improve.What was unusual about the revision project described here is that external sponsors were invitedto provide feedback, not only on the project, but on the written proposal. Thus, not only thedesign project but also the proposal writing process simulated an authentic career experience.This authentic feedback and revision process provides an opportunity to study this instructionalmethod, and also raises potential ethical questions that might surface during a
, there remain pocketsof practice and education in “sanitary engineering.” For example, the National EnvironmentalHealth Association (NEHA), founded in 1937, exists, “To advance the environmental healthprofession for the purpose of providing a healthful environment for all,” [10], and the AmericanAcademy of Sanitarians (AAS), founded in 1966, exists to, “elevate the standards, improve thepractice, advance professional proficiency, and promote the highest levels of ethical conductamong professional sanitarians in every field of environmental health” [11].In 1998, the final report of the National Science Foundation (NSF)-sponsored meeting,“Research Frontiers in Environmental Engineering,” raised an important question, namely,“Should the non
the Executive Committee for the Computing Accreditation Commission of ABET, and also serves as a program evaluator for the Engineering Accreditation Commission. He is also a founding member and serves as Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions through a standardized rite-of-passage ceremony. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Partnering to Develop Educational Software Applications: A Four-Year Retrospective StudyIntroductionSeveral years ago, a project was added to the first-year programming sequence at Ohio NorthernUniversity that focused on
understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Figure 1. An early version of EC 2000’s a-k student learning outcomes [35].The most significant thing to note about EC 2000 is their overall emphasis on professional skills(see Figure 1). Of the eleven a-k learning outcomes, at least seven, and
specific aspect, the division was made on 0-4 and5-8 years. As the focus of the study was on transdisciplinary engineering design, it was decided that ineach group, representation from different disciplines be ensured to allow for a transdisciplinarydiscussion. Therefore, one representative from each of the engineering disciplines from eachgraduation group was randomly selected and invited to the interview. Table 1 shows that thenumber of focus group participants, their disciplines and graduation year range. The dates for thefocus group interviews were selected through the group vote with alumni in May 2018. Once thedates were set, participants were emailed the arrival instructions. Due to the ethics protocol andconfidentiality agreement, no
Entering Mentoring curriculum. Topics discussed includedAssessing Understanding, Cultivating Ethical Behavior in Research, and Addressing Equity andInclusion.4.4. Weekly meetings and other activitiesThe REU students met weekly with the program leads to discuss progress in their researchprojects and to continue the Entering Research training, covering topics such as the relationshipand communication with their mentors and coping strategies. The meetings took place viaZoom, and the program director, based at Rice, visited the participants at UTEP and ASU tomeet with them in person and conduct the weekly meeting from their facilities.In addition, participants received training from the Rice Center for Written, Oral and VisualCommunication on how to
judgment withinengineering and computing service-learning has focused primarily on the social, political, andcultural impact of technology on society. This emphasis notwithstanding, the EPICS programrecognizes the value of reflective judgment and has attempted to expand the use of criticalthinking skills to include reflections on the community partner (called the project partner), teamdynamics, the design process, and ethics [23]. This approach is consistent with the broader ABET program and the characteristics of theEngineer of 2020 reported by the NAE [26]. Direct contact on projects with groups such as not-for-profit organizations and the reflection on the impact a student is making on these groups,rudimentary in service-learning, are
full suite of modern design application software [31]For more than a decade now, reports from industry and government have called for engineeringstudents to be prepared for leadership roles [3]. In the late 2000’s ASCE established a vision forthe future that frames five critical learning outcomes [4,29]: (1) master builders, (2) stewards ofnatural environment, (3) innovators and integrators of ideas and technology, (4) managers of riskand uncertainty, and (5) leaders in shaping public policy. Based on this vision, there have beenrenewed studies in the last 10 years on capstones to meet current demands. Studies have included: Engineering ethics [24] Leadership skills [3] Integrating technology (for course admin
Paper ID #21574Understanding Engineering and Technology Student Perceptions: Barriersto Study Abroad ParticipationDr. Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University Gregg M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). His research and teaching interests include leadership, global agility, globalization, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many
they have not officially announced plans to do so otherwise, the question wascompletely changed. Instead, the question was rewritten to reflect planetary protection policies.The rhetoric surrounding planetary protection policies is presently a popular topic of discussionpertaining to current and future space exploration. What makes this issue so controversial andtimely is the ethical debate around the importance of planetary protection policies. These policiesare extremely crucial and timely for deep space travel to distant celestial bodies including theMoon, Mars, and asteroids. Thus, gaining the perspective of the undergraduate participants’opinions on this topic is meaningful to depict future policy initiatives around planetaryprotection.At
States Culture includes reflections wherein participants drewconnections to home by comparing or contrasting their experiences abroad with their experiencesback home (locally or nationally). Many students drew connections to everyday elements of lifeback home, like food, coffee, alcohol, transportation, stores, and universities. Others mentionedbuying souvenirs for friends or family back home, and one participant, Ian, mentioned wantingto bring his family to places he visited. Additionally, Matthew made several comparisonsrelating to work ethic between the countries he visited and the United States. He describeddisdain for the perceived alcohol culture among locals and general “laziness” he observed in thecountries he visited, drawing
; an example of Axis 7: Engineering’s Ethical Implications. These engineeringexperiences and many others like them occurring throughout the rocket module were unique andvaluable for high school students. The general lack of student recognition revealed by theirsurveys that they were, in fact, doing engineering may arise from the conflation of engineeringwith science endemic in schools identified by Pleasants and Olson [2]. The instructor could havedone a better job illuminating for students these “engineering teaching moments” as theyoccurred. Our own research contains examples of advanced projects adapted for high school thatfailed to hold student interest and attention because they were not designed or implemented withthe P-12 environment in
drug [Topol, 2004].Using these back stories, we created a series of scenarios along with questions. We framed eachquestion so as to obscure its origin while potentially allowing the student to draw out and discussa decision error of systems engineering. Why not simply give students descriptions of the failuresand the findings we discussed and have the students evaluate them? First, we wanted to eliminatebias due to students being familiar with a particular failure. For example, the Space ShuttleChallenger accident is a frequent topic in engineering ethics lectures. A learned, in-context,response from a previous exposure would not give us an indication of their abilities in systemsengineering. Second, the point of framing a question around a
, it allows for the solution to viewed as something realistic,usable, and practical, resulting in greater overall success [6]. As an engineer, it is important tolearn about those the project will impact to ensure that the product will meet their needs. Byasking students to consider the needs of others and providing realistic environments to practiceempathy in engineering design challenges, researchers hoped to achieve two outcomes: first,increased retention and initial registration in STEM-based classes after participating in theprogram, and second, greater overall success in designing and creating solutions.The empathy connections made in the program drew heavily from education research, includingNoddings’ ethics of care and Dweck’s growth