): p. 409-426. 4. Artemeva, N., S. Logie, and J. St-Martin, "From page to stage: How theories of genre and situated learning help introduce engineering students to discipline-specific communication". Technical Communication Quarterly, 1999. 8(3): p. 301-316. 5. Cross, K., M. Paretti, and H. Matusovich. "Student beliefs about learning communication skills", in 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2013. 6. Ford, J.D. and L.A. Riley, "Integrating communication and engineering education: A look at curricula, courses, and support systems". Journal of Engineering Education, 2003. 92(4): p. 325-328. 7. Manuel-Dupont, S., "Writing-Across-the-Curriculum in an Engineering Program". Journal of
-2022, winning the Reid Miller Teaching Excellence Award in 2022.David Lin, Washington State University David Lin is an Associate Professor with a joint appointment in the Voiland School of Chemical Engi- neering and Bioengineering and Department of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience at Washington State University, Pullman, WA. His teaching interests are in Bioinstrumentation, Biomechanics, Control Systems, and Physiology. His research interests are in the Biomechanics of the musculosketal systems and multi-scale physiology of muscle contraction. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: A Themed Problem-Learning Redesign of
how to integrate and teach engineering in their classrooms. Weconjecture that this is due to engineering being viewed as more difficult to comprehend andintegrate than translanguaging practices.Preliminary ResultsThus far one of the teacher participants, Emma (a pseudonym), has taught two engineeringchallenges in her classroom. As she had an additional number of Spanish speaking students joinher class, she created a group with all the Spanish speaking students to work together andappointed the bilingual student as a leader and facilitator of the group. Emma designed a Spanishlanguage version of the English language brainstorming sheet used by the rest of the class(Figure 1). During testing, Emma also asked the students questions in Spanish
engineering curriculum. Therefore, the introduction of divergent thinking canbe met with resistance, especially if it is not related to and integrated into the engineeringcurriculum. If it is perceived as a different field, then students may not understand that studyingtheir ethical decisions will relate directly to their careers. To combat this, some instructorsapproach ethics from a convergent (cognitive) perspective and/or engage students by grabbingtheir attention (heroic actions, catastrophic events, fictionalized scenarios) that may not be aseffective at changing behavior due to taking too large of an imaginative leap.Preparation for ethical conflicts makes one more likely to act ethically [23], but most ethicaldecisions engineers face in
undergraduate degree program in biomedical engineering at the University of Utahaccepted its first freshman class in fall 1999. An integral part of the curriculum is a sequence oftwo courses in the freshman year, Fundamentals of Bioengineering I and II, whose purpose is toexpose the students to the field of bioengineering as well as to introduce some importantscientific, engineering and physiological topics which help lay the foundation for later courses.Laboratory experiences in the form of a Major Project are included in each course. The firstsemester course covers biomechanical, bioelectrical, instrumentation and computer topics; thesecond semester covers biochemical, metabolic, cellular, and integrative (e.g., biosensors)subject material. We
university to enhance engineering students’ abilities to transfer and apply mathematicsto solve problems in engineering contexts. A recent curriculum innovation resulting from theseefforts involves the integration of collaborative, applied, problem-solving workshops into thefirst-semester engineering mathematics course. This paper will summarize the project team'swork to develop two instruments - one to gauge students’ abilities in using mathematics inengineering contexts; and the other to gauge students' self-efficacy perceptions related tostudying engineering and to learning and applying mathematics – that can be used to assess theeffects of this innovation and others like it. The paper will report on the processes being used todevelop and adapt
drying, and the integration of engineering and education.Richard Gilbert, University of South Florida RICHARD GILBERT is a professor of Chemical Engineering in the College of Engineering at the University of South Florida. He is a co-pi on the FL-ATE Center Grant. He has developed educational materials for ISA (Instrument Society of America), AVS (American Vacuum Society) Science Educator’s Workshop, and the National Science Foundation through a grant to develop high school science and math curriculum content. He is currently working with D. L. Jamerson Elementary School to develop curriculum content for its Center for Math and Engineering
and internships. As we identified in the I-Corps curriculum, aminimum viable product of the Engineering Ambassadors Network is an advanced presentationstrategy that we teach to our Engineering Ambassadors: the assertion-evidence approach.8 Ourresearch has found that audiences of STEM presentations have a deeper understanding and betterrecall when the presenter follows the assertion-evidence approach, as opposed to the commonpractice of style of having a phrase headline supported by a bulleted list.9 Through the I-Corps curriculum, we realized that we could dramatically increase ourmarket size on communicating the minimum viable product by creating slightly altered versionsof the websites that we created for targeting the Engineering
) education and mentorship activities, in an effort to help students see therewards of careers in STEM and increase students’ interest in pursuing a career in these fields.Students who participate in the centers’ programs are better prepared to pursue and successfullygraduate in STEM majors, especially engineering. The Center also conducts training institutesthat provide teachers with pre-engineering curriculum to better prepare students to enterengineering degree programs. The curriculum focuses on pre-engineering skills and teachers aretrained to use instructional strategies that support connections between standards-based science,mathematics and real world engineering. The current paper describes 1) a new training programto introduce students and
through the integration of active learning and technology-enabled frequent feedback. Prior to her role and Director of Instructional Effectiveness, she worked as the Education Project Manager for the NSF-funded JTFD Engineering faculty development program, as a high school math and science teacher, and as an Assistant Principal and Instructional & Curriculum Coach.Dr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. He also serves as an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT). His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher
multi-disciplinary in nature and integrates principles of many engineering disciplinesincluding, but not limited to, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, and controlsengineering. These courses typically incorporate problem-based learning and project-basedpedagogy to effectively build the student’s knowledge and understanding. Old DominionUniversity’s Mechanical Engineering Technology (ODU MET) program offers undergraduatecourses related to Advanced Manufacturing including Robotics; Automation; LeanManufacturing; Computer Integrated Manufacturing; and Advanced Manufacturing Processes.Recently, two new courses related to mechatronics were added to the same focus area. In addition,ODU MET program has placed an increased emphasis on
studydemonstrated that students in the treatment group were engaged in active discussion and reflectionand showed higher scores for intercultural competence measured using Intercultural DevelopmentInventory (IDI). A similar study was conducted by Krishnan et al. [11] has also revealed theimportance of curriculum infusion and guided reflections in helping students develop interculturalcompetence. Both studies have emphasized that curriculum integration is an effective and moreeconomical method to impart intercultural learning. The prior studies [1], [4] conducted at theintersection of STEM and intercultural competence have revealed that infusing the concepts ofintercultural competence in pedagogy and allowing the students to reflect on their experiences
Paper ID #18137Comparison of Intrinsic Motivation of Freshmen Engineering Students asthey Participate in a Multinational Design ProjectDr. Jorge Rodriguez P.E., Western Michigan University Faculty member in the Department of Engineering Design, Manufacturing, and Management Systems (EDMMS) at Western Michigan University’s (WMU). Co-Director of the Center for Integrated Design (CID), and currently the college representative to the President’s University-wide Sustainability Com- mittee at WMU. Received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering-Design from University of Wisconsin- Madison and received an MBA from Rutgers
purpose of integrating theory with practice, students derivedmany other advantages3, 4, 12, 14, 15, 18, 25, 33, 37 from participating in cooperative educationprograms, which may be optional in some of the academic institutions where they are offered.Some of these advantages include the development of social skills, engagement in teamwork,improvement of communication skills, enhancement and greater clarity of future career goals,salary advantage, and the development of practical skills.An Interpretation of Work Based Learning in the Context of InterdisciplinarityA curriculum inclusive of a cooperative education strategy could be interpreted as aninterdisciplinary program5, 26, 31 where the work place learning experience is conceptually viewedas
, published in 2016 with SAGE. She has published numerous articles in journals including Journal of Curriculum Studies, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, and Educational Philosophy and Theory.Dr. Chongzheng Na, Texas Tech University Chongzheng Na is an associate professor at Texas Tech University. He graduated from Tsinghua Uni- versity (B.E.), Pennsylvania State University (M.S.), and University of Michigan (Ph.D.). Before joining Texas Tech, he was a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard University and an assistant professor at University of Notre Dame. His research and teaching interests include developing innovative water treatment technolo- gies and incorporating knowledge related to such efforts in
all of it.” In managing technology, it is clear that the task ahead is not trivial.SummaryThe University of St. Thomas’s Technology Management Program is a new master’s degreeprogram offered by the Department of Manufacturing Systems and Engineering with courseofferings jointly by the Graduate Programs in Manufacturing Systems and Engineering, theGraduate School of Business and the Graduate Programs in Software.The importance of technology, both as an asset and as a determinant of success for the totalenterprise, is a core concept of the Master of Science in Technology Management Program. Theprogram is dedicated to the linkage of technical and business cultures as integrated functions ofthe technology-based organization and to the
used the research to refine the instrument in its 2nd and 3rd editions. They reduced the number of the basic scales from its original 14 to 10, eliminating overlapping categories. They also limited the number of questions to an efficient 60 items [10].II. Methodology: Implementation of LASSI in the department A. The decision: The Assessment Committee in the department of mechanical engineering oversees evaluating each ABET student outcome. The committee accomplishes this task by assigning one or more outcomes to its members who in turn devise appropriate evaluation methods, coordinate integration of the methods in the curriculum, analyze the data, and
AC 2007-219: A CASE STUDY OF COURSE CLUSTERING STRATEGY TOENHANCE RELATIONAL LEARNINGMing Huang, University of San Diego Ming Z. Huang is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of San Diego. Dr. Huang is a registered Professional Engineer and is actively involved in research focusing on integrating industry practices with engineering educations. Dr. Huang received his B.S. from the National Taiwan University in Taipei, Taiwan in 1980, M.S. from the University of Rhode Island in Kingston, Rhode Island in 1984, and Ph.D. from the Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio in 1988, all in Mechanical Engineering.James Kohl, University of San Diego James G. Kohl is an
, “Constructive Alignment of Interdisciplinary Graduate Curriculum in Engineering and Science: An Analysis of Successful IGERT Proposals,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 355–369, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2010.tb01068.x.AppendixE: Engineer of 2020Label CompetencyE1 Strong analytical skillsE2 Practical ingenuityE3 CreativityE4 CommunicationE5 Principles of business and managementE6 LeadershipE7 High ethical standardsE8 ProfessionalismE9 Dynamism, Agility, Resilience, and FlexibilityJ: Job PostingsLabel CompetencyJ1 Course content/knowledge of unit operations (e.g., as kinetics, separations, transport)J2 Specific skills/knowledge (catalyst
, College of the Canyons Kathleen Alfano is Director/Principal Investigator of the California Regional Consortium for Engineering Advances in Technological Education (CREATE), an NSF ATE Regional Center for Information and Manufacturing Technology. She graduated from Chestnut Hill College with a B.S. in Chemistry (1976), Purdue University with a M.S. in Education (1981), and the University of California, Los Angeles with a Ph.D. in Higher Education, Work and Adult Development (1993). Dr. Alfano has been on the faculty at College of the Canyons since 1996. Page 12.1392.1© American Society for
of communication skills and thegrowth of their expert-like behaviors is the focus of this paper. It begins with a very brief reviewof literature, continues with an equally brief identification of some critical assumptions and theirimplications for assessment of communication in engineering students, and concludes bysuggesting quantitative and qualitative assessment strategies and one way to ensurepedagogical integrity for the assessment process. data can provide a rich picture of students’communicative competence.Research about engineering communicationResearch in rhetoric establishes a positive relationship between technical knowledge and anability to communicate that knowledge, so students can improve their understanding of
attract a more diverse student body. At present,engineering in Western countries is an overwhelmingly male-dominated field. GalvanizeU/UNHaims to help reverse this trend, as well as support a greater number of students from differentbackgrounds, by offering scholarships from partner organizations with similar goals. Another of GalvanizeU/UNH’s core goals is to create a new path for how data scienceeducation is perceived and taught. To train a new class of data scientists, educators mustemphasize problem solving and design thinking over tools and technology. Its curriculum modelfeatures needs/competency-based, learner-centric and project-based instructional strategies, andincludes opportunities for industry partnerships and continuous
learningwithout specifically requiring service learning activities in undergraduate curriculum. Focus onmulti-disciplinary team experience, formulation and solution of engineering problems, andeffective communication1 all comprise the easily achieved outcomes from service learningopportunities.While a single engineering department is capable of developing an experiential learningopportunity for undergraduate students, the development of a robust service-learning programcan be hindered by a lack of resources and inability to provide truly interdisciplinary projects forstudents. Faculty support, continued program maintenance, and overall program managementrequires resources not always available at a department or college level. A formal service-basedor
most important skill an engineer canpossess, but on the other hand they also see writing or documenting as a necessary evil11.Jeyaraj13 mentions both direct and indirect forms of communication as being important inengineering workplace. As an example, some undergraduate engineering courses use the indirectform of communication present in literature books such as “The Goal” to teach about LeanEngineering principles and the job nature of an engineering manager14.Writing-across-the-curriculum approach can be integrated with critical thinking with the help ofwriting prompts, low stakes writing assignments, problem-based assignments and reflectionsincorporated into engineering courses15, 16. While these approaches are currently widely used
, transportation, environmental, surveyingand project/construction management. While as many as one third of graduating civil engineersgo to work in the land development industry (University placement statistics, 2001-2005), fewcivil engineering programs in the country have any course or emphasis in land developmentwithin their curriculum. This paper describes an ongoing initiative that brings togetherundergraduate CEE students and faculty with industry professionals in an effort to improve landdevelopment design education.Prior to this initiative, the CEE Department had one course titled “Land Development Design”,taught once per year and it was available for more than 10 years. Historically, this course wasalways taught by an adjunct instructor, usually
Paper ID #43121Board 171: The Design of a Course to Train STEM Pre-Service Teachers(Work-in-progress)Dr. Garth V Crosby, Texas A&M University Dr. Garth V. Crosby is an associate professor in the Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution Department at Texas A & M University. He obtained his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Florida International University in Computer Engineering and ElectricalDr. Maram H Alaqra, Sharjah Education Academy Dr. Maram Alaqra has over 17 years’ experience in education, working across higher education and K-12 settings. Dr. Alaqra has taught graduate and undergraduate courses at
theexplosion of information technology1. In order to manipulate more complex systems and toexplore designs in an economically and ecologically sound manner, EEs have come to rely onextensive use of computer modeling; this is consistent with the evolution of the EE.Prior to 1900 EE was primarily concerned with the generation and transmission of electricpower as well as its uses with respect to rotating machinery. With the advent of the vacuumtube, EE entered the “electronic age” which ‘flourished’ in response to the needs of World warII. The semiconductor replaced the vacuum tube after the 1950s as the principal component ofdesign and when the transistor became integrated into larger entities (“integrated circuits”),functional design replaced discrete
. Current interests include bone tissue mechanics, engineering pedagogy, and robotic football. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Improving Student Engagement in a Senior-level Manufacturing Course for Mechanical Engineering StudentsIntroduction:The mechanical engineering curriculum prepares students for employment in a broad range ofindustries [1]. In the Midwest, many graduating mechanical engineering students will findemployment in manufacturing-related fields. This is especially true in Ohio, where 17.8% of thetotal gross state product is accounted for by over 12,000 manufacturing firms [2]. For this reason,manufacturing courses play an important role in preparing mechanical
aid data, and he continues to explore these subjects. He is also interested in engineering education culture as well as leadership and policy issues in engineering education.Rocio Chavela Guerra, Purdue University Rocío C. Chavela is a doctoral candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She obtained a B.S and a M.S. in chemical engineering from Universidad de las Américas, Puebla, Mexico. Her research interests involve faculty development, curriculum Page 15.554.1 development, and engineering education research communities. She is an Engineering Education
graduate students in STEMinterdisciplinary training and prepare them for the national workforce [3]. The NRT at ouruniversity prepares masters and doctoral students to solve the grand challenges at the nexus ofFEWS, which are complex and interdependent, and require solutions integrating engineering,natural sciences, and social sciences. Only a small percentage of college students in the UnitedStates take an interdisciplinary capstone course [4], and interdisciplinary capstones are moreprevalent at the undergraduate level [4]. At the graduate level, capstone courses are limited andvaried [5] [6] [7]. Faculty from the colleges of Engineering, Agriculture, and Arts and Sciencesat our university developed the NRT Capstone as a new part of the NRT