AC 2010-1283: IN-SITU ETHICS: THE ETHICAL SENSIBILITY THATENGINEERS BRING TO THEIR WORKTraci Nathans-Kelly, University of Wisconsin, MadisonSandra Courter, University of Wisconsin, MadisonKevin Anderson, University of Wisconsin, MadisonChristine Nicometo, University of Wisconsin, MadisonThomas McGlamery, University of Wisconsin, Madison Page 15.709.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 In-Situ Ethics: The Ethical Sensibility That Engineers Bring To Their Daily WorkEngineering educators often acknowledge that engineering ethics should be integral toundergraduate skills curriculums. In fact, the body of work regarding teaching
advisors at all levels, but as much as possible the students are involved with the leadership. Forstudents to use many of the skills they developed in the example, there is a student board of directors that vets newprevious three years towards a real, or at least realistic, project project proposals to consider whether the incoming projectobjective. aligns with the ethos of the Collaboratory and is poised to be Messiah College Engineering recently replaced the senior successful.capstone with an Integrated Projects Curriculum (IPC). In the The
entrepreneurial mindset as required student attributes for graduation. Oncerequired as learning outcomes, faculty would benefit from training on teaching these professionalskills and assessment methodology for professional skills development.The site has already added acquiring an entrepreneurial as a student learning outcome andteaches entrepreneurial mindset in stand-alone courses. Still, recent research suggests it shouldbe integrated into technical content. It seems dangerous to off-load these important professionalskills to be only taught outside of the engineering curriculum in either humanities or other stand-alone courses. A more integrated approach is needed. Engineering programs can consider addingentrepreneurial mindset to the engineering
provide the students with an opportunity 46 0.50 to use their skills and capabilities to a good human end, which is why most of the students entered engineering programs.” Multiple When integrating ethical “I think it is better to teach this concept Courses discussions throughout across the curriculum a little in every curriculum is discussed class rather than one single class. When it has a particular class, the students end
] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the entrepreneurial mindset to engineers. Springer International Publishing, 2017.[2] H. E. Dillon, L. Hamilton Mayled, M. L. Nagurka, M. I. Carnasciali, and D. E. Melton, “Intercollegiate Coaching in a Faculty Professional Development Program that Integrates Pedagogical Best Practices and the Entrepreneurial Mindset Intercollegiate Coaching in a Faculty Professional Development Program that Integrates Pedagogical Best Pract,” 2020.[3] C. Vest, “Open Content and the Emerging Global Meta-University,” EDUCAUSE Review, 2006.[4] W. J. Frey, H. D. Sánchez, and J. Cruz-Cruz, “Ethics Across The Curriculum: An Effective Response To Abet 2000,” in 2002 Annual Conference
2025 ASEE Northeast Section Conference, March 22, 2025, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT, USA. Exploring Student Use of AI Tools in Heat Transfer and Finite Element Analysis Courses Rachmadian Wulandana Mechanical Engineering Program State University of New York (SUNY) New Paltz New Paltz, NY wulandar@newpaltz.edu Abstract— This study explores how students in Heat Transfer California State University to roll out an education-specificand Finite Element
ConvivenciaSocial.Program Models for International ExperiencesStudy abroad courses that are faculty led and short term are seen as one of the major vehicles forstudents to integrate an international experience in their curriculum. The opposite is true for theGlobalCUNY model, which consists of eight weeks or more of a research experience modeledafter the traditional REU programs. In earlier work, several essential operational elements wereidentified in the programming [43]. In the Colombia based programming, a site coordinator whoserves as a liaison to the host site’s international office is key. This role is sometimes filled by agraduate student who may also be conducting research with a host faculty. The internationaloffice is also crucial in securing housing
. While these courses teach multiple data models, they do not offer labs thatprovide students with insights into the tradeoffs between different data models. Such teachingmethodology hinders students’ ability to generalize the database knowledge to learning new datamodels. The primary motivation for developing TriQL is to bridge this gap. Thus, in this section,we discuss how we can integrate TriQL labs into a database curriculum, using CS 411 as anexample.CS 411 is an elective course taken primarily by graduate students or undergraduates nearing theend of their degree, with pre-requisites, including introduction to programming and datastructures. The course is structured to cover three main units: data models and query languages(relational model
as theyformulated plans for integrating ethics into their curricula, e.g., IIT 1, Towson State2 and OregonInstitute of Technology.3) It became clear that if departments were to be successful in integratingethics into engineering courses, some form of development would be required for most facultymembers.Shortly after the need for a faculty development activity became clear, the College of Engineeringand the College of the Liberal Arts received a gift from an Alumnus to start joint activitiesinvolving engineering and ethics. This gift explicitly linked the Douglas and Julie Rock EthicsInstitute in Liberal Arts and the Leonhard Center. When the Directors of the Institute and Centermet to discuss possible joint projects, they quickly decided
University of New York, Farmingdale c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Introducing a New Graduate Degree in Technology Management: Program Overview and Assessment PlanAbstractOffering a new graduate degree requires curriculum development, course scheduling anddeveloping an assessment plan. A proper assessment plan ensures program success andcontinuous improvement. This paper provides the initial assessment plan for a new master’sdegree. The timeline of the proposed assessment activities is shared and the initialimplementation of the assessment plan for the Spring 2019 semester is discussed. Datacollection techniques and assessment benchmarks for the course level and program
an environment ofunprecedented change, so their curriculum needs to prepare them for these social, cultural, andtechnical challenges.In a 2017 review of the academic literature on climate change education strategies by Monroe etal., the authors identified increases in curricular guidelines that address climate change,coinciding with increased interest in and funding for climate education [3]. ABET incorporatessustainability and ethics in criterion 3, in student outcome 2: “an ability to apply engineeringdesign to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety,and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors” andoutcome 4: “an ability to recognize ethical and
regions of the country.Graduate certificate programs in CS have gained popularity with non-STEM bachelor’s degreestudents. Many of these students go on to pursue an MS CS degree. Of the students entering theMS program from the certificate program, up to 60% have non-STEM undergraduate majors.The university’s objective to increase graduate enrollment has driven the CS department to offermore courses to meet the educational needs of this population.Researchers sought to determine whether a new robotics programming course could assist non-STEM undergraduate majors pursuing a graduate CS degree and underrepresented populations intransitioning to CS. The course development aimed to integrate more inclusive pedagogicalpractices. This paper presents the
technologies with power systems, probabilistic production simulations, and integrated resource planning. In recent years, he has authored a number of ar- ticles and has given numerous presentations on outcomes-based engineering curriculum development and the implementation of the ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. He has authored and/or co-authored over 45 articles, a textbook which has been translated into Chinese, 22 technical reports, 12 summary papers, and 15 discussions and reviews. His professional experience includes: (1) over 32 years of university administration, teaching, consulting and research, and (2) five years of full-time work in industry.Dr. Mojtaba B. Takallou P.E., University of Portland
,engineering as an integrative method for teaching STEM is well suited as a focus for inquiry-based teaching. The integration may also have been a manifestation of the creativity andknowledge of the teachers, the nature of the elementary curriculum, and the way in which themanipulatives promote multidisciplinary approaches to teaching and learning. Since the summerinstitute was hosted by the College of Engineering, the reason for the engineering focus mayhave rested simply on this aspect. In any case, determining the underlying reason for theteachers’ lesson content choices is an interesting possible future research question.The size of the student groups that the teachers used in their observed lessons was dominated bystudents working individually
organizations; 3) interpersonal, communication,and professional skills; 4) career management and advancement; and 5) career and life balance.The graduate students, departments, and faculties do recognize the importance of integratingprofessional development within the graduate curriculum [10], yet the feedback on theseinitiatives have reported low student acceptance and demand of opportunities to learn anddevelop such skills [1,10]. Though, overall it is evident that there is a scarcity of literature onprofessional development in engineering graduate education. In this paper, we describe thedesign of the professional program at the University of Calgary, and the results from an analysisof feedback data from the past two years. The program builds on the
the curriculum [1, 2]. In addition, studies have shown that PjBL hasimproved students’ retention of prior and current course material [3-5]. Outside of theimprovements in future engineering courses, the use of PjBL has shown to better preparestudents for the workforce and the challenges they may face. However, one concern ofimplementation of PjBL is that it may overwhelm a student especially when conducted in lowerlevel courses. In some cases, schools of higher education may choose to teach lower levelcourses following the conventional lecture format and allow students to participate incompetition teams as an extra-curricular activity.Numerous engineering programs across the world participate in competition programs, such asBaja SAE (Society
Page 15.1212.324 – Professional & Ethics as outcomes that may be challenging for programs to fully implement.The purpose of this paper is to provide a summary of how the civil engineering curriculum atRose-Hulman Institute of Technology (RHIT) compares with the BOK2 outcomes associatedwith the baccalaureate degree.Institutional ProfileRose-Hulman is an undergraduate-focused engineering college offering baccalaureate degrees inengineering, math, science and economics. RHIT also offers Master’s degrees in mostdepartments. Located in Terre Haute, Indiana, RHIT was founded in 1874 and has a populationof approximately 1,900 students, the majority of whom are seeking baccalaureate degrees inengineering and are traditional post-secondary learners
Paper 2005-2287 Expectation Management: Lessons Learned in Establishing a Start-up Multidisciplinary Technology Entrepreneurship Program* R. Keith Stanfill University of Florida Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringAbstractThe University of Florida Integrated Technology Ventures (ITV) program is designed to provideengineering and business students with an intense, immersive entrepreneurial experience.Participating students learn the entrepreneurial process as members of a virtual company led by aserial entrepreneur who acts as a volunteer CEO. The company is composed of a CEO
could address the degree to which teachers wouldimplement the recommended strategies to improve gender equity in the classroom.VI. Dateline Video Parts I and IIAn integral part of the gender equity workshop consisted of viewing the Dateline NBC video:Failing in Fairness Parts I and II. Originally broadcast as two segments on Dateline: Part I airedApril 7, 1992 and Part II aired Feb 8, 1994. Failing in Fairness is an examination of gender biasin American schools. The findings from twenty years of research by two social scientists, Myraand David Sadker, show that gender bias in our schools presents a challenge in providing anequitable education for boys and girls. Girls are consistently given less attention andencouragement than boys, especially
likely well covered in most accredited undergraduate mechanical engineering programs, thejudicious selection and application of such tools, the critical interpretation and verification ofresults, and the proper documentation of the procedures used are important topics that must beintegrated into programs. Perhaps the biggest challenge facing the inclusion of computationaltools and information technology within an undergraduate program is integration. The era of thestand-alone “computational methods” class and the assigned “computer project” is waning;students must be expected to recognize the need for computational methods in all courses acrossthe curriculum, and select and apply computational tools wherever and whenever appropriate.Student
course in the program is a sophomore levelintroductory course. The course objectives are to provide an introduction to basic computer toolsand an overview of the department. The changes in the curriculum dictated changes in most ofthe department’s engineering courses including the introductory course. The intent of this paperis to discuss the content of the introductory course and how the course emphasizes theinteractions between engineering and biology.I. IntroductionTraditional agricultural engineering programs have always emphasized a strong basicengineering background. This background spans many engineering disciplines including civil,chemical, electrical, and mechanical engineering. As an applied engineering discipline, much ofthe
everyoneinvolved. While much of the lecture material was similar to that presented in the old circuitscourse, one objective was to integrate some electronics and signals material in this first course.The addition of this new material necessitated selective removal of previously-covered circuitsmaterial, i.e. details of transient and phasor analysis, that would now be covered in futurecourses. The decision was made to include more exposure to diodes and to add a significantintroduction to MOS transistors in this first course. An introduction to the Fourier series wasadded to enhance the analysis of simple circuits excited by sinusoids.While the selection and integration of new material was somewhat challenging, much more workwas required to integrate the
maindeliverable and student assessment instrument for the course. The second step is for students toconduct research in the summer as outlined in the proposal.2. Research ProgramThe two-step research program was implemented as part of a curriculum enhancement project inthe Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering. The nanotechnology LINK project, orLearning Integration of New Knowledge, exposes undergraduate students to fundamentalconcepts and applications in nanotechnology, with an emphasis on end-of-life management ofproducts containing nanomaterials. Content is delivered across multiple linked courses (Pierceand Berge, 2014) using active learning pedagogical strategies. To complement and extendstudent learning of nanotechnology, research
and sharing curricula for their own classrooms.The workshop was designed as a learner-centered program to promote deep and meaningfullearning within the chosen Technology/Engineering curriculum strands with the followingsignificant core beliefs as a foundation: ≠ SPS teachers are experts in their classrooms ≠ The experiences and challenges of SPS teachers are valuable and important and must be validated and appreciated ≠ Workshop instructors have expertise in the subject matter, but do not have knowledge of the challenges of an SPS middle school classroom ≠ The workshop was a collaboration, not a top-down teaching experience ≠ Learning how teachers learn and teach is a
Paper ID #21548Active Learning Module Development for At-Risk Learners in EngineeringGraphicsDr. Jeremy V Ernst, Virginia Tech Jeremy V. Ernst is Associate Director of the School of Education at Virginia Tech. He currently serves as the Director of the Office of Educational Research and Outreach and is Program Leader of the Integrative STEM Education graduate program. He is also a Fellow of the Institute for Creativity Arts and Technol- ogy at Virginia Tech. Jeremy specializes in research focused on dynamic intervention means for STEM education students categorized as at-risk of dropping out of school. He also has
learning and development ofinnovation skills such as integrative learning, teamwork, and problem-solving.Collaborative learning (CL) as an approach to learning has been shown to benefit studentssocially, psychologically, and academically (Laal & Ghodsi, 2011), and as such, incorporatingthis strategy within innovation education may help provide students with richer learningexperiences. Specifically, CL has been found to develop social support for learners, builddiversity in understanding concepts, develop learning communities, increase student self-esteem,reduce student learning anxiety, and promote critical thinking skills, among other benefits (Laal& Ghodsi, 2011; Johnson & Johnson, 1989; Pantiz, 1999). CL is often a key component
implementedcurriculum and the learned curriculum6. Each of these phases is a part of the research and designprocess for curriculum as it is created and used in classrooms. In a similar vein, Kelly examinesthe use of design-based research in education by describing an example of research-basedsoftware development in mathematics education and points to ways engineering educationresearch could adopt design research methodologies5 for iteratively creating and testinginnovative teaching methods. Design has been used in engineering education primarily from the point of view of developingstudents’ abilities as designers and considering their use of design processes in learning to beengineers 7 or from the perspective of design professionals8. We use “design research
sector as a hardware/application engineer upon graduation from Texas A&M University.Mr. Vincent Michael Rodriguez, Texas A&M University Vincent Rodriguez is an senior undergraduate student in Electronic Systems Engineering Technology ma- jor at Texas A&M University. He is currently Associate Lab Manager for the Mobile Integrated Solutions Laboratory (MISL), and is the Software Lead for the STRATA-1 project, a NASA experiment that will run on the International Space Station (ISS). Vince is seeking a job in the private sector as a software engineer after the spring 2016 semester. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 STRATA-1
audiences. University engineeringprograms can fill this gap to promote their educational programs to youths in their regions. Theycan begin to integrate skill development with their outreach sessions to promote desiredengineering skills, or habits of mind, such as problem solving, collaboration, creativity,communication, ethical considerations, innovative thinking, etc. [3]. Recognizing the importanceof this preparation, the College of Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno coordinatedsummer camp programming for middle and high school students to introduce them toengineering disciplines and get them excited about pursuing an education in this field. TheCollege of Engineering summer camp program primarily focused on exposing students
, this provides us with a good starting point to thinkabout how cases can be effectively integrated in engineering ethics as an instructional method.ConclusionWhile case-based instruction is clearly the most commonly employed method of ethicsinstruction in the engineering curriculum, it is by no means the only method. Other methods ofintegrating ethics into the engineering curriculum include the use of external course work (e.g.,philosophy classes), service-learning projects, team-based senior design course work, and theacross the curriculum approach (integration of ethics in multiple courses throughout theacademic career). However, we know little about whether or not the use of case studies is betterthan the other methods of ethics