Conference Session

Educating Students for Professional Success

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert J. Gustafson, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies, New Engineering Educators, Student

program, theory vs. application (hands-on), 2) faculty issues such astenure and reward systems and staying current with field and pedagogy, 3) specific curriculumcontent issues of communications, teamwork, technology use, ethics and 4) concern regardingstudent preparation and retention of information. Objective 3 Students will be able to recognize the options for types of instructionalapproaches.. Results from a pair of questions related to types of instructional approaches theypreferred as a student and then how they are or have been teaching demonstrate that a gap doesexist between the two (Figure 2). The largest gap occurs in the areas of active learning exercisesand laboratory

Conference Session

WIED Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elaine R. Millam, University of Saint Thomas; Ronald J. Bennett, Univeristy of Saint Thomas

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

productive manner. The teamagreed on one approach and all left the room feeling it was a win-win.Earlier in her career, Ellie was a project manager who had constant personality problems with thequality manager. Nothing she did seemed to be right. She learned to understand the social styleof this manager and through persistence and active listening broke down the communicationsbarriers in three months. They are now enjoying a great working relationship as the result ofEllie‟s perseverance.Doing the right thing is a trait that pervades those interviewed. Marsha Salter was an engineer ata company that produces fluid handling equipment. She believes that to be a good leader one hasto be ethical, do what is good for business and be able to sleep at night

Collection

1997 Annual Conference

Authors

Janet K. Allen; Farrokh Mistree; Jennifer Turns

term (see Table 1) and takes the student through the stages of conceptual design and meta-design (planning), through detailed design, to construction, demonstration, and even a littlemarketing. Table 1. ME3110 Class Periods Because teaching such a course Period Weeks Description ID presents serious logistical, Bid 1.5 Bid: Newly formed student teams must submit a report detailing their team’s work ethic and their statement of the problem, resembling a contractor bid. cognitive, and motivational DR1 1.0

Collection

1998 Annual Conference

Authors

Michael D. Murphy; Kristen L. Wood; Kevin Otto; Joseph Bezdek; Daniel Jensen

-Austin, USAFA, and MIT. Course Institution and Methods and Theories Activities and Outcomes LevelME 202 UT-Austin; Survival skills, professions in ME, world-wide Skill exer., web search, teamIntroduction Freshman web, email, modeling, ethics, first team dynamics, MBTI, air-waterto Mech. experience, intro. to engr. design, simplified rocket analysis, reverse engr. ofEngineering reverse engineering mech. products (toys, etc.)EM 290 USAFA; Design processes, customer needs, functional Incremental design notebookIntroduction Sophomore

Conference Session

How to Get Published: Tips from Journal Editors

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bevlee Watford, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

manuscripts:research investigations and research reviews. Research investigations should state the questionsaddressed and their context relative to the body of knowledge on the subject. The relevanttheories should be presented, research design described, limitations acknowledged, and researchmethods and instruments discussed so as to permit evaluation of the validity and reliability of theevidence offered. Ethical considerations in data collection, analysis, and reporting involvinghuman subjects should be addressed. A description of any statistical analyses, discussion of theuncertainties, and the significance of the results to advancing engineering education research orpractice should be provided. Research reviews should state the propositions addressed in

Conference Session

ADVANCE Grants and Institutional Transformation

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna M. Zajicek, University of Arkansas; Shauna A. Morimoto, University of Arkansas; Joseph Rencis, University of Arkansas; Valerie H. Hunt, University of Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Programs Using New Instrumentation Concepts

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jerry Keska, University of Louisiana, Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Instrumentation

of materials on the Internet, there isalso the ever-present danger of plagiarism. Consequently, the instructor should clearlyexplain the ethical and judicial repercussions of plagiarism. This will hopefully guide thestudents to police their own practices.10 Because OEPs require the students to doindependent study on the subject and to define a unique idea using limited knowledge,another good resource is the US patent database. Because each patent must have at leastone cookbook-type recipe concerning how to implement the idea, this makes patents avaluable source for students working on OEPs. However, in the case of patents theinstructor needs to very carefully guide the students in their selection of good qualitypatents. Even though most high

Conference Session

Aerospace Technical Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Crawley, MIT; Robert Niewoehner, United States Naval Academy; Jean Koster, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

contribute to understanding. It isappropriate to set aeronautical education in the context of aerospace product development forseveral reasons. First, it is what our graduates will do when they graduate. It culturally preparesthem for the activities of engineering, and excites them by satisfying their desire to perform theroles of an engineer. Secondly, it aids in teaching the skills that they will need in the workplace.If we are to teach students to communicate and work in teams, and especially to act ethically andcreatively, it is far easier to impart this understanding while working on authentic engineeringactivities. Finally, and most subtly, learning in context better supports the learning of the criticalaeronautics core competencies

Conference Session

Student Learning, Problem Solving, and Critical Thinking 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natasa S. Vidic, University of Pittsburgh; Nur Ozge Ozaltin; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

as the Advisory Board for the NAE Frontiers of Engineering Education.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry Shuman is senior associate dean for academic affairs and distinguished service professor of in- dustrial engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering educational experience, emphasizing assessment of learning and problem solving abilities, and studying the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. He was the principal investigator for a seven university NSF sponsored study on Models and Modeling that focused on using MEAs in engineering classrooms. Dr. Shuman is the founding editor of Advances in Engineer

Conference Session

Classroom Management

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

be grounded in research, periodically evaluated, andadapted to reflect the developing knowledge base. (11) Implementation of learning stylepractices must conform to accepted standards of ethics, and be carried out by competentinstructors, who can provide suitable activities that appeal to each learning style. Topromote effective learning, within the context of varied learning styles, it is important toform groups within the class. How do you form effective groups? How do you makegroups work? What do groups do? The answers to these questions will differ from onecourse to another, depending on: course type, course content, course level, prevailingculture, available resources, and applicable guidelines.Research has shown that some learners have

Conference Session

K-12 Engineering Resources: Best Practices in Curriculum Design, Part 1 of 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malinda S. Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder; Madison J. Gallipo, University of Colorado Boulder; Janet L. Yowell, University of Colorado, Boulder; Derek T. Reamon, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

good work ethic can achieve success in a STEM-related field. To helpalleviate these preconceived, negative stigmas about engineering, the STEM teachers plan tospend more time informally educating their school staff about the field of engineering, that it isfor any student who is willing to work hard and dedicate themselves to it; it is not just for “reallysmart” people who are good at math.Limitations of Study/Further QuestionsThe findings of these analyses should be placed within the limitations of this study. The cohortof participants is drawn from students attending Skyline High School in Longmont, CO. Studentsself-select into the program at this high school by applying to the STEM Academy during their8th grade year. While 8th grade

Conference Session

Mechanical Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diane L. Peters, Kettering University; Joy Arbor, Kettering University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Paper ID #8496Student Perceptions of Connections between Statics Class and Co-op WorkExperienceDr. Diane L Peters, Kettering University Diane L. Peters is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University in Flint, MI. Her engineering education research focuses on the links between industry and academia.Dr. Joy Arbor, Kettering University Joy Arbor is assistant professor of communication in the Department of Liberal Studies at Kettering University. She teaches communication, public writing, and ethics

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Education Session 3

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony Joseph, Pace University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

computing onsome fields might still be in its infancy.Like engineering, computing is a very creative process involving innovative design that isconditioned by business, economic, social, political, ethical, and technical constraints1,3 generallywithin the setting of a team structure. Therefore, one could conclude that the computingprofessional should at least be educated and trained on a comparable level as the future engineer. Page 24.1177.3One way to ensure that computing professionals are sufficiently well educated and trained inbusiness and economics is to expose them to entrepreneurship education and training in thecontext of teamwork

Conference Session

Curricular Issues in Computing and Information Technology Programs II

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Reneta Davina Lansiquot, New York City College of Technology; Ashwin Satyanarayana, New York City College of Technology; Candido Cabo, New York City College of Technology/CUNY

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology

. The linking of the CS1 problem-solving course in an LC withEG1 further integrates narrative elements into computer problem-solving courses; thisintegration should result in improved and more transferable computer problem-solving skills.2.3 Introduction to Computer Systems (CS0)In this foundational course for Computer Systems, students engage in an overall inspection of theworld of computing. As part of this course, students also learn introductory concepts related to theinner workings of the computer, such as operating systems, networks, and database systems. Thisoverview of machine architecture, software development, data organization, ethics, computersecurity, and the theory of computing is presented to introduce students to the key threads

Conference Session

Beyond the Classroom: Summer and Scholarship Programs to Engage Minorities

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College; Wenshen Pong, San Francisco State University; Nilgun Melek Ozer, San Francisco State University; Hamid Mahmoodi, San Francisco State University; Hao Jiang, San Francisco State University; Cheng Chen, San Francisco State University; A. S. (Ed) Cheng, San Francisco State University

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues: Persistence

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cate Samuelson, University of Washington; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

intentions to persist in male-dominated fields, such as engineering. 5 However, women who have had internships or otherforms of engineering-related employment tend to be less likely to perceive conflicts betweencareer and family, which can influence their decisions to persist in engineering.16Professional Development and SocializationStudents’ socialization or learning about the professional culture within engineeringorganizations can contribute to their professional development.17 Just as important is learninghow to function within an organization.15 Researchers argue that internships and co-ops providestudents with organizational and cultural experiences that facilitate mastery of communicationskills, professional ethics, and collaboration.17-19

Conference Session

Grasping the "Concept"

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrienne R Minerick, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

choosewhich topic was most interesting and join the team. Timing was such that the first item (theAgreement of Cooperation19) was due at the end of the first week of class so that the teams werestarted quickly with a clear, immediately milestone. Feedback was given on these agreements sothat students had all discussed how to deal with conflict, differing work ethic, and how to bestrespect each other’s ideas. The schedule and plan of progress reports were outlined in thesyllabus on the first day of class for the students. The progress reports were: • Team’s Agreement of Cooperation: Outline goals and guidelines of group participation. • Progress Report 1: Introductory description of proposed, novel analytical

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics I

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa L. Larkin, American University; Jessica Uscinski, American University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

thought in ModerateInnovative Thinking imaginative and creative waysGE-6 Assessing and weighing of moral and political beliefs and MinimalEthical Reasoning practices, and their applications to ethical dilemmasGE-7 Locating, evaluating, citing, and effectively using ModerateInformation Literacy informationGE-8 Applying mathematical, statistical, and symbolic reasoning StrongQuantitative Literacy and Symbolic to complex problems and decision makingReasoningTable IV represents the connections made to the 3 area-specific learning objectives. Area

Conference Session

Outreach Along the K-12 Pathways to Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelly Doyle P.E., University of Nevada, Reno; Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego; Catherine W. French, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; Heidi A Tremayne P.E., Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center; Sean P Brophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

. Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego Lelli Van Den Einde is a faculty lecturer (LPSOE) in the Department of Structural Engineering at UC San Diego’s Jacobs School of Engineering. Dr. Van Den Einde’s interest in teaching has influenced her current research efforts towards improving engineering education pedagogy through the use of technology in the classroom. She is involved in promoting academic integrity as a way to prepare our students to be ethical practicing engineers, and is the chair of the External Advisory Committee for the IDEA center, which promotes inclusion, diversity, excellence and advancement in engineering. She has conducted research in performance-based earthquake engineering and

Conference Session

Track 3: Technical Session 1: Bridging Educational Equity Gaps: A Systematic Review of AI-Driven Tools for Students Living with Disabilities in Engineering and STEM Education

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Kevin Zhongyang Shao, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Eric Kyeong-Min Cho, University of Washington; Sophia Tang, University of Washington; Hanlin Ma, University of Washington; Sep Makhsous, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

by improving social interactions and personalized learning. Italso discusses the limitations of existing AI tools, emphasizing the need for future developmentsto focus on personalization to cater to individual learning needs more effectively while takingprivacy and ethical considerations into account.Rather than focusing purely on NDDs, Bhatti et al. [17] analyzed diverse applications of AItechnologies aimed at assisting students with not only dyslexia and dyscalculia but also a widerspectrum of learning disabilities. Similar to the review by Barua et al., this study also examinedliterature involving facial expressions and eye-tracking analysis to monitor students’engagement. The authors highlight the potential of AI to provide personalized

Conference Session

Track 7: Technical Session 4: Diversity in STEM: Strategies of Professional Engineering Organizations in Recruiting and Retaining Women from Minority-Serving Institutions

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Rebeca Petean, Society of Women Engineers; Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

additional questions thatprompt questions aimed to explore individual experiences and capture nuanced recruitmentexperiences.The study's protocol was submitted for Institutional Review Board (IRB) review and was exemptfrom full review. To ensure the confidentiality of all participants in this study, the researchersexplained the interview's purpose and format, obtaining consent for recording, and consent toparticipate in the study. Moreover, a direct line of contact information was provided forfollow-up inquiries, and participants were given the verbal option to omit or add any informationwithin two months from the start of the interview. Adhering to ethical standards and privacylaws, all participants were fully informed about the terms of their

Conference Session

Sustainability and Social Responsibility

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gabriel Azure Antonio Mendez-Sanders, Carnegie Mellon University; Heather Phillips, University of Pittsburgh; Joanne Kay Beckwith, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

ChemE educators seekinnovative ways to engage and retain students, interventions like PORPs offer valuable insightsinto how contextualized learning can shape students’ perceptions of the field and their futurecareer prospects.Institutional Review Board ConsiderationsThis study, titled “Impact of People-Oriented Recitation Problems,” was reviewed anddetermined to be exempt under the 2018 Common Rule 45 CFR 46.104.d by the CarnegieMellon University Review Board (IRB). The exemption was granted on August 26, 2024, undercategories (1) educational settings and (2)(i)-(iii) tests, surveys, interviews, or observation.Limited IRB review was conducted where necessary, ensuring compliance with ethical researchstandards. The study's IRB determination is

Conference Session

Lightning Talk - Empowering Students and Strengthening Community Relationships

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division (COMMENG)

that its main beneficiaries are “vulnerable communities that can be rural, urban ormixed, and face social, environmental and economic problems.”[39] The main objective of theecosystem is to “generate transformations in the quality of life of vulnerable communitiesthrough collaboration between diverse actors (academic, private, social, etc.) and the applicationof engineering following frameworks of social justice, equity and sustainability, and the socialappropriation of knowledge as a bridge between technical solutions and community needs.” [39]The fundamental principles of the landscape are:o Respect for the diversity of knowledge and dialogue of knowledge.o Empathy, professional ethics and cooperation.o Co-creation: collaborative solutions

Conference Session

Informal Education and Outreach Programs for Women Engineering Students

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wynn Tranfield, University of California, Santa Cruz; Shelby Hallman, University of California, Los Angeles; Emily Halan Dovan, University of California, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

liaisons to onboard them to the project, checked in regularly, and provided opportunitiesfor survey instrument feedback. Several campuses experienced shutdowns and disturbances due to protests during thefour-week period the survey was open. During those periods of heightened institutional response,survey release dates were staggered. Each campus was offered an equal number of days tocomplete the survey.3. Participants and procedures This study followed ethical procedures approved by the Institutional Review Boards atUniversity of California, Santa Cruz, where data was collected and housed (HS-FY2024-218),and the University of California, Los Angeles (IRB#24-000478). The fully anonymous surveywas open to self-identified women graduate

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 8: Professional Development for Graduate Students

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Elisabeth Gehr, Purdue University; Emily Garcia, Purdue University; Suzanne Swaine, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Stephen McBride, Purdue University; Joseph Vincent Rispoli, Purdue University; Christopher Greg Brinton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

thedocument if one focuses on the research and scientific skills of statistical analysis, creativity andinnovation, ethical research, and technical skills (Figure 1). Figure 1: An example of how to write an IDP for research and scientific skills, taken from the Purdue University College of Engineering Individual Development PlanThe third step is for the student to meet with their PhD advisor to discuss the IDP and identifyguidelines for their relationship. Brief paragraphs are included for what makes a good researchmentor and mentee to remind each party about honesty, communication, and mutual respect(Figure 2). During this meeting, the student and advisor should answer each of the seven sets ofquestions to

Conference Session

Mechanics Division (MECHS) Technical Session 1A

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacklyn Wyszynski, University of Pittsburgh; David Adam DeFrancisis, University of Pittsburgh; David Pabst, University of Pittsburgh; Lee Allen Dosse, University of Pittsburgh; Matthew M. Barry, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics Division (MECHS)

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - AI and Digital Futures in Design Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel D. Jensen, Westmont College; William Johnston Allison; Camila Rapalo; Mark Rogers; Gregory Reich, Air Force Research Laboratory, Aerospace Systems Directorate; Landon Thomas Vanderhyde

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

suggestsalternative perspectives or analogies to inspire new ideas and solutions based on the framing andreframing of human inputs. This conversational interface allows for a fluid exchange of ideasbetween designer and AI which creates interactive dialogue that helps to create novel conceptsthat may not be possible though traditional DM (10).There are numerous drawbacks associated with GenAI that are noted throughout the literature. Itcan be non-deterministic, uncontrollable, or overly generic which means that many trials need tobe taken to reach a desired outcome (5). It is also a challenge to incorporate into the curriculumas educators need to be trained and educational frameworks need to be updated (8, 11, 12).Additionally, there are ethical concerns with

Conference Session

ENT-5: Pathways for Developing Entrepreneurial Skills Across Educational Levels

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Irene Reizman, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Maysam Nezafati, Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech & Emory University; Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University; Mary Lauren Benton, Baylor University; Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Mitchel Daniel, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Jonathan Rylander, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

and use those insights to drive informed decisions. ● Recognize ethical considerations relevant to data gathering and data visualization. 6. Maximizing the ● Describe the impact level of your research, including listing key results Impact of Your and identifying the groups most interested in those results. Research ● List a variety of options for sharing undergraduate research, including both traditional academic venues (conferences, journal articles) as well as venues for reaching audiences outside of the academic context. ● Identify the venues that might be most appropriate for

Conference Session

ENT-1: Innovative Approaches to Student Engagement and Belonging in Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauren H. Logan, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

a detailed description for each category and achievement level was given. Thecomplete rubric is provided in Appendix B.The EME as a class project is tied to ABET Student Outcome Three: “an ability to communicateeffectively with a range of audiences” and Seven “an ability to acquire and apply new knowledgeas needed, using appropriate learning strategies” [22]. For fall 2025, ABET SO4 (“an ability torecognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informedjudgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic,environmental, and societal contexts”) will be tied to the EME. For SO3, science communicationas a tangible skill feeds into an engineer’s ability to create value for

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division (CONST) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Blanca Esthela Moscoso; David Francisco Coronado; MiguelAndres Andres Guerra P.E., Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ; Valeria Dayana Izurieta

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering Division (CONST)

provide a more accurate and supportive measure of student achievement [24],[25], [26].Background/FrameworkAcademic integrity refers to the expectation that all members of the academic community actaccording to universal standards of responsibility, honesty, and sincerity, avoiding unethicalpractices such as plagiarism and cheating [27], [28], [29]. Plagiarism is defined as submittingsomeone else's work without proper citation and is a serious violation of academic ethics [30].Cheating on tests can be caused by multiple factors, including inadequate preparation, workloadoverload, or fear of failure [31]. In many cases, students are not taught values such as honestyand responsibility from the beginning of their education, making them more