coursedevelopment, leading to complete integration of intent and collaboration processes among thepartners.Early in the curriculum-development effort, faculty committed to following an inquiry-led modelfor the classroom, focusing on student-led collaboration rather than faculty-initiated learningprocedures. To facilitate this approach, the curriculum was developed around key concepts andquestions, rather than around lectures and information dissemination. By creating general areasof inquiry that span across disciplines, multiple faculty could provide the perspectives of theirown disciplines to inform a broader understanding of the topic relevance. For example, on thetopic of environment and society, the engineering faculty led the discussion and
Paper ID #15069Video Instruction to Complement All Learning Styles in a First-Year Intro-duction to Engineering CourseDr. Jack Bringardner, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Jack Bringardner is an Assistant Professor in the First-Year Engineering Program at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. He studied civil engineering and received his B.S. from the Ohio State University and his M.S and Ph.D. at the University of Texas at Austin. His primary focus is developing curriculum and pedagogical techniques for engineering education, particularly in the Introduction to Engineering and Design course at NYU. He has a background in
gains from first yeardesign.References[1] N. L. Fortenberry et al. “Engineering Education Research Aids Instruction,” Science Vol. 317, August 2007.[2] Beier, M.E. and Rittmayer, A.D., “Motivational Factors in STEM: Interest and Self-Concept,” Olio Digest(2010), 7-11.[3] Bandura, A., “Self-Efficacy in Human Agency,” American Psychologist, Vol. 37, 1982.[4] Stevens, R., O’Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A. and Amos, D.M., “Becoming an Engineer: Toward a ThreeDimensional View of Engineering Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, July 2008.[5] Savage, R., Chen, K., Vanasupa, L.,“Integrating Project-based Learning Throughout the UndergraduateEngineering Curriculum.” Journal of STEM Education Volume 8, Issue 3 & 4 June-December 2007.[6
development in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 An Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Measures for Assessment of Professional Skills in an Undergraduate Civil Engineering CurriculumIntroductionThe undergraduate Civil Engineering curriculum at The Citadel emphasizes preparation ofgraduates to serve as principled leaders in design, construction, maintenance and operation of thebuilt-environment. In support of this vision, department faculty adopted a series of outcomesfocusing on the professional skills needed to prepare graduates for successful engineeringcareers. Course material is provided recurrently within the curriculum that emphasizes studentdevelopment of
2 School of Computing, University of GeorgiaAbstractProject-Based Learning (PBL) is a pedagogical method that combines theory and practice byinvolving students in real-world challenges. Continuous feedback is crucial in PBL, guidingstudents to improve their methods and foster progressive thinking. However, PBL faceschallenges in widespread adoption due to the time and expertise needed for effective feedback,especially with increasing student numbers. This paper presents a novel approach usingGenerative AI, specifically an enhanced ChatGPT, to provide effective PBL feedback. For anundergraduate Web Technology course, we integrated three methods: 1) fine-tuning ChatGPTwith feedback from various sources; 2) using additional course-specific
ManufacturingEngineering Technology Program," Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference and Exposition, pp. 7.824.1-9, 2002.[4] D. Crevier, "Educational Experiments in Machine Vision," IEEE Transactions onEducation, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 90-92, 1996.[5] G. Morison, M. D. Jenkins, T. Buggy and P. Barrie, "An Implementation FocusedApproach to Teaching Image Processing and Machine Vision - From Theory to Beagleboard,"Proceedings of the 6th European Embedded Design and Research, pp. 274-277, 2014.[6] R. N. Savage, K. C. Chen and L. Vanasupa, "Integrating Project-based Learningthroughout the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no.3, pp. 15-27, 2007.[7] C. Jiang, Y. Wan, Y. Zhu
of StudentEngagement (NSSE) which is administered to each freshmen and senior student.The Department of Engineering at WKU is an ABET accredited program that has a mission ofproject-based engineering education. The department has chosen to engage students through thistype of educational experience. Since the programs in the Department of Engineering are ABETaccredited, the ABET criterion must be satisfied. The three programs in the department; civilengineering, electrical engineering, and mechanical engineering; have created individualassessment programs in order to continuously improve the programs. Project courses and designexperiences play an integral role in the delivery of the project based courses at WKU. This paperwill examine the
isequivalent to one 50 minute lecture period or a 30 minute lab) shared between all complementarystudies. Our accreditation board acknowledges the need for interpretation and judgement whiledistributing these units across the range of topics covered by this category, noting: While considerable latitude is provided in the choice of suitable content for the complementary studies component of the curriculum, some areas of study are essential in the education of an engineer. Accordingly, the curriculum must include studies in the following: a. Engineering economics b. The impact of technology on society c. Subject matter that deals with central issues, methodologies, and thought
undergraduate and experienced graduate students who have a demonstrated interest in issues of sustainable development. 2) Integrating the research experience into education initiatives that are focused on sustainable development. 3) Ensuring the research experience focuses on appropriate technology (defined here as the use of materials and technology that are culturally, economically, and socially suitable to the area in which they are implemented). 4) Using an operational model for sustainable development that is a global partnership, so students understand how to integrate and transfer the best and most appropriate knowledge, methodologies, techniques, and practices between the developed and developing
courses in the MEM, chosen case studiesand their analyses and presentations and engagement in a team project. Out of thesethe first two were assessed on a formative basis. The team project and submitted caseanalysis were assessed on a summative basis. A table showing sample projects ispresented. Feedback obtained from a sample of the two past student cohorts indicatesthe effectiveness of the method.1 Introduction Capstones are integrative learning experiences near the end of a curriculum thatenhance student learning through reflection, application, and synthesis of previouslygained knowledge and skills throughout the program [1]. These gained knowledgeand skills allow the students to make valuable connections between theory they havelearnt and
/softwareare covered. The final two weeks are dedicated to student-initiated experiment-design projects.For pedagogical reasons, the problem-based learning (PBL)2,3 was adopted for this course. WithPBL, students are empowered to self-direct their educational experience by designingexperimental systems and/or subsystems against given specifications. It is an instructionalmethod which uses real-world problems to facilitate students’ critical thinking and problemsolving skills while accomplishing the course objectives. Students get involved and takeresponsibility for their learning experience, and the instructor becomes a resource. The purposeof implementing PBL is to motivate the student to integrate and utilize their knowledge. In thisinstrumentation
aspects particularly in education, technology-enabled learning, and feedback driven grading approaches. His thesis was titled ”Micro-credentialing with Fuzzy Content Matching: An Educational Data-Mining Approach.” ECE Best TA Award, Three Minute Thesis finalist, and Senior Design Day Showcase winner of Fall 2021, are a handful of many awards obtained within this pursuit. In addition, the PhD research led by Mr. Amoruso is aiming to integrate machine learning in the collected educational data gathered in his Master’s research.Dr. Ozlem O Garibay, University of Central Florida Dr. Garibay has over 20 years of combined experience in creating and developing multimillion-dollar complex software systems and research in
. They state that design intent not only describes an artifact’s requirements andconstraints, but can also serve an expectant role in the design process. Their research examinedmethods used to share design intent information between models, but encountered difficultiesresulting from an absence of standards and data-exchange procedures. Dorribo-Camba andContero echoed these thoughts by stating that design intent is often embedded in the modelingapproach and in the dependencies between features in the CAD software17. Their research detailsmethods to represent annotations in order to enable increased design communication. Theseannotations are then housed and integrated in a Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) system.While many authors have
accountability,individual homework grades were recorded and individual tests were given throughout the year.A thorough understanding of the projects prepared students for most of the material on the tests,but some material was covered only in supplemental lectures and homework problems. Detailsof our curriculum design, delivery methods and our implementation experiences are availableelsewhere.1, 2Our overall project assessment goals were to evaluate how the project-based, spiral curriculumaffected students’ ability to: solve problems at several levels of cognition, work in teams, workindependently, master the fundamentals of chemical engineering, and integrate material fromseveral courses. We were also interested in how it affects student attitudes and
for learning, and a variety of attitude changes.11Inaddition, LTS may help attract and retain a greater diversity of students in engineering.12,13To allow more students to reap the benefits from LTS, faculty must be willing to integrate SLinto their courses and mentor extracurricular LTS activities. However, little is known about thebest practices, benefits, and challenges of LTS from an engineering faculty perspective. Resultsfrom the few studies on faculty to date are summarized below.The SLICE program at UMLhas conducted assessment of faculty via both an annual writtensurvey instrument and in-depth interviews with 14 faculty.14 The reach of this program has beenphenomenal, growing from a single faculty member engaged in SL in 2003 to 37 of
seven year review and assessment of Lawrence Technological University’s Alternative Energy Engineering Program initially funded through grants from the State of MichiganAbstractLawrence Technological University applied for and received two funding grants from the Stateof Michigan in 2003 and 2004 to develop curriculum and to establish courses in the field ofAlternative Energy Engineering. Lawrence Tech in 2003 was one of five schools in Michigan toreceive these initial funds. This paper reviews the decision making process originally used toestablish the curriculum, the engineering courses developed through these grants, theestablishment of an Alternative Energy Engineering laboratory, and the subsequent evolution ofthe
there is more freedom to incorporate their own knowledge and experience into the solution. Engineering has been a huge motivator for the students to put forth an effort with TAKS so they may participate in these other activities. TAKS scores on the science tests across the state are extremely low. Science has usually always taken a back seat to reading and math. Looking more closely at the scores, it is also apparent that the physical science strand is the worst performed. Teachers typically stick to the areas that they are comfortable teaching. Life science is where most of the curriculums start so these areas are covered before the crunch of test time approaches. Earth sciences are fun and the
Education Transfer Plan to integrate theknowledge gained through the work experience into the classroom.[1,4] The Georgia InternFellowships for Teachers (GIFT) program is sponsored by the Georgia Institute of Technologythrough its Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing.[6] Since1991, this program has placed an average of 75 teachers per year in university and industrysettings to gain practical knowledge about current industry practices.[6] Program evaluations onboth the IISME and GIFT program reveals that after participating, classroom teachers are morelikely to use "real-life" examples, incorporate hands-on activities, integrate other fields ofknowledge within their course curriculum, and use scientific inquiry as a
that products designed to applicable constraints and combined withlocal empowerment can have an impact in markedly improving the lives of the less fortunate.Consequently, Polak’s ASEE presentation inspired instructors of the first-year engineeringcourses at Ohio Northern University to undertake, what was to some, a radical redesign of theircurriculum: the incorporation of a capstone project focusing on poverty alleviating designs for aThird World country.First-Year Engineering CurriculumThe first-year engineering curriculum at Ohio Northern University is a year-long (three quarter)sequence. The intent of the sequence is to both introduce students to interdisciplinary topics ofimportance in engineering and to integrate the students into
, interdisciplinarity and continuity, integration and synthesis (ofinstruction, practice and experience). It encourages active learning and collaboration andcommitment to inquiry beyond the curriculum. Finally, good general education builds dynamicassessment and improvement into curricular processes.”1The recommendations that were eventually adopted unanimously by the Faculty Senateemphasized, above all, the active engagement of students in their education. A variety ofmeasures were taken to foster curricular experimentation, encourage dialogue and criticalthinking, and incorporate collaboration and teamwork into the courses that comprise the generaleducation program. In order to establish this kind of expectation right from the start forincoming students, a
Paper ID #37157Student Perceptions of Programming Instruction in aMakerspace vs Synchronous Remote EnvironmentJames E. Lewis (Associate Professor) James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals in the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. His research interests include parallel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology (Tablet PCs) used in the classroom.Nicholas Hawkins (Assistant Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
Page 14.257.3abroad in addition to the expectation among students that studying abroad is an integral andimportant part of their undergraduate education. Kettering University sends the majority of itsstudents to Western Europe (mostly to Germany). While Americans who study abroadtypically study in the humanities and social sciences, notable increases have been seen inbusiness and technical fields such as engineering and in hard science fields.Safety has been one of the main concerns for all study abroad programs in the years followingSeptember 11, 2001. This, in addition to the current world economy has been very challengingto maintain good number of study abroad student applicants. In the continuing debate over thefuture of International
Learning approach should be equally effective in a curriculum for Bioengineering majorsas well.In Contextual Based Learning, the fundamental biology and physiology required of Bioengineerscan be introduced to the students in the context of design problems, the solution of whichrequires an understanding of specific engineering concepts. In such a modular learningenvironment, an integrated understanding of the science, along with the analytic skills and howthey are utilized to solve design problems, are presented in a coherent context, providing thestudents with incentive to learn material which in a traditional content based approach mayappear arbitrary and dull. Importantly, the fundamental engineering knowledge can beintroduced over an extended
at the University of Michigan. She studies curriculum, teaching, and learning in college and university settings, particularly how facDr. Joi-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan Joi Mondisa is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering and an Engineering Education Faculty Member at the University of Michiganˆa C”Ann Arbor. Dr. Mondisa holds a PhD in Engineering Education, an MS in Industrial ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Receiving curricular messages: Engineering students’ understandings of valued practices in their fieldAbstractThis research paper examines the curricular messages perceived by students about
needand desire to reduce the gap in student learning and real world problem solving asgraduates enter the workforce. The National Academy of Engineering has appealed toengineering programs to integrate theory and practice in the curriculum, and introducemore innovative learning methods that simulate industrial decision making in theclassroom and laboratory [1]. Hence, the challenge for engineering educators is the useof more innovative methods for instruction and learning to replicate real world problemsolving, and provide an environment for intellectual exchange of ideas and solutions in aclassroom setting. This is further reinforced by the Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology (ABET) to encourage the use of a cadre of tools and
adjusting teaching methodsin the classroom to accommodate student learning styles. One teaching method proven effective iscomics, where panels of animations are coupled with informative text. Though commonlyperceived in an entertainment setting, comics provide an effective alternative to traditionalteaching methods such as textbooks or lectures1. In this study, comics have been specifically usedto demystify the field of chemical engineering and introduce the many opportunities it presents tostudents and professionals alike. 1.1 Chemical Engineering Enrollment The perception of chemical engineering curriculums in national undergraduate programs, aswell as of existing post-graduate opportunities, are often restrictive in nature. Students often
to process and identify connections with environmental, ethical, and societal factors.The components of an effective service learning reflection can be described by the 5 C’s:continuous, connected, challenging, contextualized, and coached [11]. The reflection should becontinuous throughout project, that is, it should happen before, during, and after the experience.The connection component should link the service experience to the course curriculum. Thereflection should challenge students to engage with current issues, while also contextualizing thework in a way that fits the specific project. Finally, coaching is necessary for supporting studentsintellectually, emotionally and academically.Student reflections can also be useful tools for the
students to engineering. For example, Busch-Vishniac andJarosz (2004) suggested that integration of team experiences to the curriculum of engineeringthat traditionally had been left to senior year, in earlier years would improve the reputation ofengineering and help students enjoy the academic experience more. Similarly, Gunasekera andFriedrich (2009) argued that the dominant theory-based and not value-oriented pedagogies inSTEM “alienate those students who learn best in creative, cooperative settings that considervalue and emphasize design and synthesis” (p. 162).Intentional instruction about teamwork, particularly when it emphasizes diverse teams andinclusive work practices, offers students professional skills they need to be successful, while
Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(24), 273-279.12. Mohagheghi, S. (2020, June). A pedagogical approach for developing an entrepreneurial mindset in engineering students. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.13. Johnson, E., Budnik, M., & Tougaw, D. (2009, June). Integrating Entrepreneurship Throughout an Electrical and Computer Engineering Curriculum. In 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 14-757).14. Sarkar, D. (2020, July). Engineering the Future–Communicating Across Borders Through Elevator Pitches. In 2020 First-Year Engineering Experience.15. Condon, M. & Ruth-Sahd, L. (2013). Responding to introverted and shy students: Best practice guidelines for educators and advisors
. Page 4.13.8Conclusions A 4-point beam bending experiment was developed for use in a classroom setting.Students work in teams, and are able to measure the load deflection characteristics of a beam andcalculate the modulus of elasticity for different materials.Acknowledgement The authors would like to thank the National Science Foundation for their supportthrough the Foundation Coalition, Director Karen Friar, University of Alabama. Project No. NSFEEC-9221460Bibliography1 Malave, C.,"Teaming in the Integrated Curriculum of the Foundation Coalition at Texas A&M," ASEE NationalConference, Washington, D.C., June 1996.2 Griffin, R. B., Ragupathi, P., Johnson, E., “Development of a Thermal Conductivity Experiment for Use in Class