course difficulty in engineering schools located inother countries, in order to discuss implications for different educational systems. 5. AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by CORFO under grant no. 14EN12-26862.The authors wouldlike to thank Paolo Fabia, Angela Parra, and Sebastián Vásquez for motivating this study asstudent representatives in 2019, aiming to create a shared meaning for course demandamong students, teaching staff, and managers.6. References[1] D. Gerrard, K. Newfield, N. B. Asli, and C. Variawa, “Are students overworked? Understanding the workload expectations and realities of first-year engineering,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2017.[2] M. Christie and E. de Graaff, “The philosophical and
solving skills. Many researchersand practitioners propose moving from using the acronym STEM to science, technology,engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM). The difference in STEM and STEAM is theinclusion of arts of any kind, aligning artistic creativity with STEM learning. Zimmerman andSprung concluded that motivation and self-confidence in computing for females is increasedwhen they can learn CS in the context of a content area, they are already comfortable with [1].Recognizing this cross-disciplinary connection approach, Mississippi State Universityresearchers in 2014 integrated a physical art component module that enabled girls to designrobots using crafting material, with positive results. In 2019, the team piloted a 4-day camp
, increase persistence rates both within degree programsand into the workforce. The initial study on student beliefs and endorsements wascompleted in 2017 and the video production intervention was piloted in 2018. At the time ofthe 2019 ASEE annual conference, the data analysis on the intervention will be completeand will be presented at the poster session.2. Background Goal-Congruity Theory (GCT) states that people are more likely to pursue a career thataffords the values they endorse (Diekman, 2010). From the perspective of a student, thereare two places that values are important: 1) what values does a student personally holddear? and 2) what opportunities does a student believe a given career provides for? Whenthese two types of values are
Braced Frame Analysis o Single Story Buildings: Grocery Store, Steel Warehouse o Multistory Buildings: AISC 3 Story Steel Building, 4 Story Building o Bracing Vs. Shear Wall Analysis Rigid Frame Analysis: 4 story Building – Unbraced Rigid FrameVI. AssessmentAssessments of the changes in the Structural Analysis, Structural Steel Design, and ReinforcedConcrete Design courses are being conducted using the Student Outcomes from the 2019-2020ABET Engineering Programs Criterion 3.10The student outcomes that are specifically assessed in the Structural Analysis course are asfollows: 1. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of
interview and think-aloud sessions are also ongoing. Theresearch team holds bi-monthly meetings in which each member independently reviews eachtranscript and generates a set of themes related to the reading and writing practices and cognitiveframeworks used by each engineer. These emerging themes inform our interpretation of theevaluative frameworks that engineers use while they read and wrote genres in the context ofsocially situated activities. After independently reviewing each transcript, the team membersthen discussed the similarities and differences that were found among each other’s perspectives.Preliminary results from the initial round of coding with the mechanical/aerospace andelectrical/computer engineers were presented at the 2019 ASEE
., & Duan, D., & Kubichek, R. (2022, August), A Remote Communication System Teaching Laboratory Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2—41257. [3] Scher, A., & Klopf, E. (2019, March), Development of Laboratory Assignments for Teaching Communication Systems Paper presented at 2019 ASEE PNW
revisions were identified to support undergraduate educators inlaunching or revising their own REU sites.Summary of REU Site ActivitiesThree cohorts of undergraduate students participated in our REU at the University of Alabama(UA), with one cohort in each summer of 2019, 2021, and 2022. The program was paused in2020 due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. For each summer of the program studentsattended campus in Tuscaloosa, Alabama for 10-weeks of research, professional development,social, and cultural activities. Participants were expected to spend 40 hours per week in programactivities, with approximately 32-35 directly on their research and 5-8 on professionaldevelopment, social, and cultural activities each week.The program activities for
sessions and spotlightpresentations at conferences or similar virtual events that attract technician educators. Theseleadership activities contribute to achieving broader impacts in the ATE Community.References[1] C. K. Pickering, E. L. Craft, and C. VanIngen-Dunn, “The Emerging Impact of Community College Hispanic-Serving Institutions (2-year HSIs) in Educating Technicians in Advanced Technologies – Defining the Opportunities and Addressing the Challenges,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019, Accessed: Jul. 09, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/33389.[2] C. K. Pickering, E. L. Craft, C. VanIngen-Dunn, A. T.- Gallegos, and E. DeWitt, “Emerging Role of 2
/Philosophy of Engineering Division, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June 24-27, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/106/papers/23382/view. [Accessed Dec. 29, 2019].[2] T. Polk, M. Smallwood, J. Sluder, R. Hart and J. Pacheco, “The impact of professional communications training on teamwork and leadership skills,” in Conference proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, USA, June 25-28, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/78/papers/19974/view. [Accessed May 28, 2021].[3] National Association of Colleges and Employers, “The four career competencies employers value most
women not only fill the state’s need for a highly skilled work force, but also provide apath to financial security for their families. Just saying we should engage these learners is notenough, we need to provide targeted support- curricular, academically and socially.References[1] Bowman, K. (2015). Texas versus California: Trends in Gender Diversity and Impacts by Engineering Discipline. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, 1-9. doi:10.18260/p.24843[2] Www2.calstate.edu. (2019). Graduation Initiative 2025| CSU. [online] Available at: https://www2.calstate.edu/csu-system/why-the-csu-matters/graduation-initiative-2025 [Accessed 30 Jan. 2019].[3] California State University (2019). Redefining Historically
improvements to theengineering education system are needed to overcome such barriers and allow widespreadteaching of social justice topics in engineering curricula. The United Nations (UN)’s 2030Agenda for Sustainable Development emphasizes the need to defeat poverty and embrace socialjustice for all humanity [7]. This agenda further underscores the need for fostering sociotechnicalthinking among future generations of engineers so that they can tackle the global societal andenvironmental challenges that have more severe consequences on marginalized communities.Interest and efforts to integrate social justice into engineering curricula have increased in recentyears. For example, in 2019, 117 American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE
engineering design,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2013.[3] C. Garibay and R. M. Teasdale, “Equity and Evaluation in Informal STEM Education,” New Dir. Eval., vol. 2019, no. 161, pp. 87–106, 2019.[4] B. Williams, J. Figueiredo, and J. Trevelyan, Engineering Practice in a Global Context. 2013.[5] R. E. Dunlap and K. D. Van Liere, “The ‘new environmental paradigm,’” J. Environ. Educ., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 10–19, 1978.[6] A. Byars-Winston, “Toward a framework for multicultural STEM-focused career interventions,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 340–357, 2014.[7] C. Kivunja and A. B. Kuyini, “Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 6, no. 5, p
. Effective for Reviews during the 2020-2021 Accreditation CycleIncorporates all changes approved by the ABET Board of Delegates Engineering AreaDelegation as of November 2, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/E001-20-21-EAC-Criteria-Mark-Up-11-24-19-Updated.pdfAssociation of American Colleges & Universities. (2009). Member Survey Findings. Retrievedfrom https://www.aacu.org/about/membership/surveytalkingpoints.https://www.aacu.org/leap/hipsAidoo, J., & Sipes, S. M., & Hanson, J. H., & Lovell, M. D. (2013, June), Capstone DesignAlumni Survey Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta,Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/19283Brouwer, R., & Sykes, A., & VanderLeest, S. H
for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, 2020 – 2021. ABET,Baltimore, MD, 2019. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-technology-programs-2020-2021/. [AccessedJanuary 22, 2020].[18] ABET ETAC Side By Side Criteria Final 01 01 19. ABET, Baltimore, MD. Available:http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/ETAC-Side-By-Side-Criteria-Final-01-01-19.pdf. [Accessed, January 22, 2020.][19] E. M. Cooney, “Adapting the VALUE Rubrics to ABET ETAC Outcomes A-K.” Paperpresented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana.https://peer.asee.org/20027.[20] AACU, Written Communication VALUE Rubric. Association of American Colleges andUniversities
Achievement Among Black College Students,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 599–625, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.46.5.0599.[36] B. Johnson and J. Main, “Underrepresented Minority Engineering Students’ Professional Experiences with Cooperative Education: Perceived Benefits, Drawbacks, and Pathways to Participation,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, pp. 1–18. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33474.[37] M. Polmear, A. D. Chau, and D. R. Simmons, “Intersection of Diversity, Out-of-Class Engagement, and Engineer of 2020 Outcomes for Civil Engineering Students,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000901.[38] G. E. Anzaldúa
and qualitative data analysis. Student GPA and industry careerwould be another avenue to explore and encourage educators in providing enriching experience.7. REFERENCES[1] Yoder, B. B. L., and Ph, D., 2011, “‘Engineering by the Numbers,’” pp. 11–47. [2].[2] Ra, S., Shrestha, U., Khatiwada, S., Yoon, S. W., and Kwon, K., 2019, “The Rise of Technology and Impact on Skills,” Int. J. Train. Res., 17(sup1), pp. 26–40.[3] Yoder, B. B. L., and Ph, D., 2017, “E Ngineering by the N Umbers,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.[4] Desai, N., and Stefanek, G., 2017, “A Literature Review of the Different Approaches That Have Been Implemented to Increase Retention in Engineering Programs across the United
: Perceptions of Requirements and Impediments for Civil Engineering & Construction Disciplines, in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2019: Tampa, FL.7. Rose, A.T., et al., “The Spaghetti Factor” – A Peer Leadership Model for the “Sticking Together” of Untenured Faculty Prior to Their Tenure Decision, in 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2005: Portland, OR.8. Lipscomb, J.W., Acquiring Tenure In Engineering Technology, in 1999 ASEE Annual Conference. 1999: Charlotte, NC.9. Porter, J.R., R. Fink, and J. Ochoa, Balancing Tenure Requirements With Family Life: Perspectives From Three Tenure Track Faculty Members, in 2001 ASEE Annual Conference. 2001: Albuquerque, NM.10. Stalcup, A.M., The
, a gap has been created between these branches of constructionto the point that their teaching approaches are different, thus forming a deficiency ofunderstanding between them and complex working environments in professional life.This study seeks to understand the cultural differences between civil engineering andarchitecture students, based on Hofstede's theory of cultural dimensions. Fivedimensions are evaluated: Individuality, Power distance, Uncertainty avoidance,Masculinity, and Long-term orientation. Data were collected from four groups: civilengineering students pre-pandemic and post-pandemic and architecture students’ pre-pandemic and post-pandemic to determine if the new teaching methods associated withthe COVID 2019 pandemic, may
Excellence, the 2010, 2014, 2018 and 2019 College of Engineering Student Council Professor of the Year Award, 2008 Excellence in Teaching Award for College of Engineering, and 2004-2005 Mechanical Engineering Instructor of the year award, 1999 ASEE- GSW Outstanding New Faculty Award. Dr. Manteufel is a Fellow of ASME with teaching and research interests in the thermal sciences. In 2015-2016, he chaired the American Society for Engineering Education Gulf Southwest section and in 2018-2019 he chaired the Academy of Distinguished Teaching Scholars at UTSA. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Texas. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
Design for Learning (UDL) framework,” in 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Covington, KY, USA, Oct. 2019, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028693.[A5] C. C. Hain, W. C. Turek, A. E. Zaghi, and A. Hain, “Board # 156 : Experiences of Pre- College Teachers Working with Undergraduate Engineering Students with ADHD in Research Laboratories,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 27786.[A6] M. Chrysochoou et al., “Redesigning Engineering Education for Neurodiversity: New Standards for Inclusive Courses,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, ASEE Conferences, Jul. 2021.[A7] A
Antonio, Texas: ASEE Conferences. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22002.“Peer Evaluation CATME Smarter Teamwork.” n.d. CATME (blog). Accessed February 13, 2023. https://info.catme.org/features/peer-evaluation/.Stengel, Jake P. 2022. “Development of Software Tools for Efficient and Sustainable Process Development and Improvement,” June.Warnock, James N., and M. Jean Mohammadi-Aragh. 2016. “Case Study: Use of Problem-Based Learning to Develop Students’ Technical and Professional Skills.” European Journal of Engineering Education 41 (2): 142–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2015.1040739.Yenkie, Kirti M. 2019. “Integrating the Three E’s in Wastewater Treatment: Efficient Design, Economic Viability, and Environmental
collected for the first three cohortsof the Endeavour S-STEM Program. Due to a pause in the program during the COVID-19pandemic, the three cohorts did not start in consecutive years. No freshman cohort was recruitedfor the fall of 2020. Table 1 shows a timeline of the first three cohorts. Engagement data (notpresented in this paper) has been collected each semester and institutional records (includingGPA and retention) have collected for each completed school year.Table 1Time Spent in Program for Each Cohort 2018 2019 2019 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022 2023 Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Cohort 1 Year 1 Year 2 Cohort 2 Year 1 Year 2 Cohort 3
workshops has been a focus on community.The power of the EU network is the crisscrossing nature of relationships linking faculty membersfrom different institutions including private and public, small and large, and urban and ruralschools. This has created a natural opportunity to develop and offer faculty developmentworkshops that build bridges linking faculty across disciplines and institutions. When the facultydevelopment workshops were originally conceived, it was believed that in-person experienceswere critical for community building, despite the significant investment in both cost and facultytime.In 2019 six in-person faculty development workshops were supported and offered under theauspices of EU. One unique aspect of each of the workshops
American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Inverted Approach to Teach InversionAbstractInversion is one of the most important weather phenomena that determines air quality and istypically covered in courses concerning air pollution. Anecdotal evidence indicates that followingtextbook readings and lectures, students generally express misconceptions about this topic. Addingactive learning to the classroom has been advocated amongst the best practices for highereducation, with physical in-class demonstrations being especially effective for engineeringeducation. The study explores the impact of adding a laboratory demonstration, centered oncreating an artificial inversion layer (with dry ice, smoke bombs, and bubble
. Marutschke, V. Kryssanov, H. T. Chaminda, and P. Brockmann, “Smart Education in an Interconnected World: Virtual, Collaborative, Project-Based Courses to Teach Global Software Engineering,” in Smart Education and e-Learning 2019, 2019, pp. 39– 49.[9] G. M. Warnick, “Global competence: Its importance for engineers working in a global environment,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2011.[10] Elizabeth Redden, “International enrollments declined at the undergraduate, graduate and nondegree levels in 2018-19,” Inside higher Ed, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.insidehighered.com/admissions/article/2019/11/18/international-enrollments- declined-undergraduate-graduate-and. [Accessed: 03-Feb-2020].[11] “Duration of
currently linked with amid-summer new student orientation, creating an extended orientation experience for mostparticipants (participation in the linked new-student orientation is not required). Students spenda total of four nights on campus in a residence hall, followed by a three-day rafting and campingtrip on a river that is about 2 hours from the university. The structure and activities of theprogram were described in more detail in the previous ASEE paper [4] mentioned above. TheRAISE program is also a required component of an NSF S-STEM scholarship program, which isa part of the Redshirting in Engineering consortium [5].RAISE offers students the unique experience of building a diverse STEM community. Programlearning outcomes include
student teams [2].Study Setting and MethodsThe study setting is an introductory engineering course at University of Delaware, a mid-sized,research-intensive state university in the US. The course is taken in the first semester (fall) by allincoming engineering students across all majors. The course is taught in two identical, large-enrollment sections of ca. 350 students per section with additional instructional help fromundergraduate TAs called peer leaders [3]. From 2016-2019, the course was offered face-to-facewith twice weekly 60 minutes of lecture and active learning exercises in a large auditorium [4].In Fall 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the course was offered in an entirely online formatwith asynchronous lectures [5]. In Fall 2021
Design (APRENDE): Development of a Funds-of-Knowledge Approach for the Formation of Engineers," in Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[19] J. A. Mejia, M. Arana, M. Roberto, and N. Reyes, "¿Por qué no los dos? The Importance of Translanguaging in Bridging Language, Literacy, and Engineering," in Proceedings of the 2020 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, 2020.[20] J. A. Mejia, A. Esquinca, V. Popov, M. Arana, M. Roberto, and N. Reyes, "Integrating Asset- based Practices, Engineering, and NGSS: Lessons from Working with Teachers through a Community-focused Approach," in Proceedings of the 2020 American Society for Engineering
standards in problem solving and written communication while retaining high student favor.References[1] Saterbak, A., & Volz, T. “Implementing Calibrated Peer Review To Enhance TechnicalCritiquing Skills In A Bioengineering Laboratory Paper”, 2008 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2008, pp. 13.708.1-13.708.13. doi: 10.18260/1-2—3128[2] Feldman, J. Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schoolsand classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Corwin, a SAGE Company, 2019.[3] Smeding, Darnon, C., Souchal, C., Toczek-Capelle, M.-C., & Butera, F. Reducing the Socio-Economic Status Achievement Gap at University by Promoting Mastery-Oriented Assessment,”PLOS One, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. e71678–e71678
2015ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015.[2] S. C. Ritter and S. G. Bilén, “EDSGN 100: A first-year cornerstone engineering designcourse,” in 2019 FYEE Conference, 2019.[3] L. Prendergast and E. Etkina, “Review of a First-Year Engineering Design Course,” in 2014ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.[4] R. W. Freeman, K. Gentry, and J. E. Goldberg, “Changing the Advising Model,” in 2016ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[5] S. Santillan, L. TeMiquel-McMillian, J. Ganley, and S. Tantum, “WIP - 360 Coaching toSupport Whole-Student Advising in the First-Year,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, 2022.[6] J. K. Brown, N. Stringer, R. K. Anderson, and L. Whisler, “Supporting Student LearningThrough Peer-led Course