of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for Scholarly Publications.Dr. Mayra S. Artiles, Arizona State University Mayra S. Artiles is an assistant professor in engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her research expertise includes engineering doctoral education structure, experiences of underreprAbimelec Mercado Rivera, Arizona State University Abimelec Mercado Rivera is a Puerto Rican doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the En- gineering Education Systems and Design program at Arizona State University. Abimelec received his ©American Society for
that highlights and seeks to address the two-fold gap identified above.Section 2 focuses on engineering design, which is the specific aspect of engineering examined inthis paper. Section 3 outlines a case study and analysis of the design practice of an engineeringprofessional, as EP addresses a grassroots engineering problem. Section 4 discusses theimplications of this analysis. We close with a conclusion section.Section 1: The need for a socio-technical understanding of engineeringA core component of Engineering Education Research (EER) focuses on the differences betweenclassroom problems and workplace problems, and points to the need to prepare students for real-world problem-solving. “If students are to learn to think like engineers, they
, which Spitzer and others call for,requires purposeful, planned transformation to develop graduate education as an integrated system forlifelong learning that is concurrent with the working professional’s on-going practice of engineering inindustry. Determining the specifications for integrated professional curricula requires that a cleardistinction be made between the differences of traditional research-based graduate education for academicscientific research and that of practice-based professional graduate education for technology developmentand engineering leadership of systematic innovation in industry. We believe that the characteristics thatdifferentiate these two types of graduate studies can be distinguished best by using modern
employees for a new project or ventureConvince a customer or client to try a new product for the first timeConvert a useful scientific advance into a practical applicationDevelop your own original hypothesis and a research plan to test itGrasp the concept and limits of a technology well enough to see the best ways to use itDesign and build something new that performs very close to your design specifications
science department, we have a need to demonstrate this computer-basedtechnology to our new graduate and undergraduate students as a means to enhance theirlearning experience and motivate them to utilize their computer knowledge and skills insolving real-life problems. Aside from the scientific algorithm involved, the projectaddresses several practical considerations involved in the design and development of iris-based recognition systems such as system functionalities as well as the flexibility and theacceptability for the user interface. Two computer science students were assigned the taskof designing, building and implementing a prototype using software development toolsand scientific computing methods. In this paper, we provide general
. The Integrative GraduateEducation Research and Traineeship on Magnetic and Nanostructured Materials (IGERT-MNM)is a collaboration between Purdue University, Cornell University, and Norfolk State Universityto train interdisciplinary science and engineering doctoral students for future roles as leaders inthe materials science and engineering fields. As part of this socialization into future careers,students proceed through a variety of modules. This paper specifically covers student learning ina pedagogy module, which introduces students to best practices in teaching and learning.Graduate student reflections on the development of high-school level student and teacher scienceand engineering activities were analyzed via thematic coding methods in
a monetary incentive, there isthe possibility that participants might not be genuine and honest with their answers. While wecleaned the data for participants who answered all the same answer and who did not completemore than two items, this limitation is still a possibility. Third, the study was not designed toseparate doctoral students from master’s students, nor research-based master’s students from “non-thesis” or “coursework-only” master’s students. While we sampled graduate students from similarinstitutions with high research productivity, there may be underlying variation in the sample thatis not immediately evident. Therefore, suggestions for future work include performing anExploratory Factor Analysis on the used data to extract new
. 12. Kurfiss, J.G. (1988) Critical Thinking: Theory, Research, Practice and Possibilities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2. Washington, D.C.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education and the Association for the Study of Higher Education.BiographiesJANICE MILLER-YOUNG is a P.Eng. with a background in mechanical engineering and a PhD in biomechanics.She has worked in the oil industry, has consulted for sports equipment companies and academics on biomechanicsresearch, and has been teaching engineering design for three years. She also incorporates writing-across-the-curriculum and inquiry-based learning concepts in more traditional courses such as statics and dynamics.RYAN WARRINGTON has an MSc in mechanical engineering with a
learning (TEL) initiativewithin the CoE. Wendt Commons’ TLS team identified specific goals and outcomes in theareas of faculty engagement, knowledge transfer, and improving the quality of teaching andlearning services in the CoE, namely: ● Increase faculty engagement by providing valued and high quality services ● Facilitate knowledge transfer of best practices and support peer to peer interaction ● Support application of sound pedagogical practices informed by engineering education research ● Foster a community of practice around exceptional and innovative approaches to teaching and learning by helping faculty to build connections, both internally and externally ● Adopt evidence-based quality measures to guide course design
2016, a new interdisciplinary Energy Science and Engineering master anddoctoral graduate major degree program called the “energy course” was created withapproximately 140 faculty from 6 departments and approximately 100 students. To graduatefrom the master or doctoral energy course, students must complete energy theory, discipline-based and career oriented coursework, and prepare a research-based thesis. In this paper, bothenergy programs will be introduced, discussed and summarized based upon a best practices pointof view.Energy EducationEnergy and in particular renewable energy education and degree programs in higher educationhave been growing over the last two decades with the green economy1. For example, the Univ.California Berkeley’s
, moresatisfied students with enhanced career potential. Beginning in AY 2009-10, the Collegebrought together faculty advisors from the eight departments to discuss best practices, establishnew academic policies, and to begin to draw all the departments towards convergence inadvising methods. It soon became clear that to reach convergence on new college-wide advisingpractices, a program with faculty support and recognition was needed. Consequently in AY2011-12, the College launched the Designated Faculty Advisors (DFA) program, for which theDean and the Provost split the funding needed to provide course released time for 16 facultyadvisors. In addition to expanding their advising repertoire, the presence of engineering facultyfrom every department lent
research on women in science and engineering into practical tips for faculty mem- bers. She earned M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Cognitive and Human Factors Psychology from Kansas State University and a B.A. in psychobiology and political science from Wheaton College in Massachusetts.Greg Pearson, National Academy of Engineering Greg Pearson is a Senior Program Officer with the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) in Washing- ton, D.C. Greg currently serves as the responsible staff officer for the NSF-funded project ”The Status, Role, and Needs of Engineering Technology Education in the United States.” He is also study director for the Chevron-funded project, Guiding Implementation of K-12 Engineering in the United States. He
hired as a member of a flight test team for one of theadvanced aircraft development programs in the Sikorsky (Parent organization: Lockheed Martin). Twoyears ago, he presented a talk about his experiences with Sikorsky and shared some lessons learned in hispast career. Moreover, another aeronautical engineering graduate was hired by Scaled Composites threeyears ago. He also had a technical talk in our institution and presented the latest projects in the company heworks for.One of common points for both presentations was the significance of what they learned here in SNHU thatwere employed in their aircraft research/design projects. Both graduates had a few recommendations abouthow to better teach aeronautical sciences and skill to students to be
. His research interests include capstone design teaching and assessment, undergraduate engineering stu- dent leadership development, and social network analysis. He is also a licensed professional engineer in the Commonwealth of Virginia.Prof. Tom Weis, Rhode Island School of DesignLt. Col. Harry Howard Jones IV c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Mechanical Engineering Design for Complex Environments: Incorporating Industrial Design Perspectives into a Multidisciplinary Capstone Design ProjectAbstract The rapid pace of global communications development coupled with an unprecedentedincrease in technological advancement has increased the need for
industry and the benefits received by educationalinvestments is limited and therefore the samples for this research are taken from industrialalliances, the case study of one company and current graduate students.This paper provides insight from members of the Buying and Information Group (BIG), astrategic alliance of twelve independent welding gas and supply companies located throughoutthe United States. The BIG group meets on a regular basis to discuss best practices within theindustry. While all of the companies within the BIG group provided information regarding theirviews on educational support, only half of the companies financially support education of theiremployees. Only Red Ball Oxygen provided us with permission to name its company in
workshops.We are part of a five year NSF-funded study, NanoTeach, which is examining best practices(pedagogy and content) for helping teachers to include NSE in physical science concepts. Theprogram is funded to Mid-continent Research in Education and Learning (McREL), Stanford,Georgia Tech, and Aspen Associates. Results from this study will begin to be available within ayear and will add additional results to help inform professional development programs in NSE.The NNIN NSE teacher professional development program is part of the agenda of the NNINsite at Georgia Institute of Technology. The other 13 NNIN sites do not offer professionaldevelopment programs for teachers. This site is also the primary coordinating site for all NNINeducation programs and
Paper ID #33519Motives, Conflicts and Mediation in Home Engineering Design Challengesas Family Pedagogical Practices (Fundamental)Dr. Jungsun Kim, Indiana University Bloomington Jungsun Kim, Ph.D. is a research scientist at Indiana University in Bloomington. Her research focuses on how students can consistently develop their talents throughout their educational experiences and in what ways parents, school, and community support students from underrepresented groups support it.Dr. Soo Hyeon Kim, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Soo Hyeon Kim is an assistant professor of Library and Information Science at School
part collectiveaction that had a positive impact in that community. The PRGs provided a forum for students todevelop a local community, be accepted by that community, and to develop their participation ina larger disciplinary community and feel validated as engineers and researchers.5 conclusion The PRGs provided a valuable incubator for engineering graduate students to developkey communication skills in a supportive environment that provided local and disciplinarycommunity. Students saw value in the immediate and long-term communication developmentthey achieved through the groups. This included improved immediate work as well as the skills,habits, and mindset to craft improved work on their own in the future. They additionally
McKilligan, Iowa State University Dr. McKilligan is an Associate Professor of Industrial Design. She teaches design studios and lecture courses on developing creativity and research skills. Her current research focuses on identifying impacts of different factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for design ideation, and foundations of innovation. She often conducts workshops on design thinking to a diverse range of groups including student and professional engineers and faculty member from different univer- sities. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and the ISU Site
accessible community for the very individuals to whom it was designed to serve.As demonstrated through recent ethnographic attempts to study these spaces, access into amakerspace emerges in a variety forms, including how easy a space is to enter, how one isintroduced and oriented to the space, and how the space is physical designed (Penney et al.,2016). Such accessibility to a makerspace, in general, can impact how students perceive makingand even how they perceive themselves as a maker (O'Connell, 2015). A space becomessuccessful and sustainable through providing access to technology and partnerships (Myers,2015).Beyond access, other literature noted best practices include: proper training for users, a clearlydefined mission, encouragement of
, 2010 A ew Engineering Taxonomy for Assessing Conceptual and Problem-Solving CompetenciesAbstractAn engineering taxonomy is being proposed in order to assess and enhance the student’sconceptual and problem-solving competencies. The taxonomy consists of the following taxa:pre-knowledge conceptual experiences; basic conceptual knowledge; applied conceptualknowledge; procedural knowledge; advanced knowledge and analytical skills; project-basedknowledge; and professional engineering knowledge and practice. A Concept and Problem-solving Inventory (CPI) has been developed in order to assess the student’s conceptual andprocedural skills. The CPI contains a set of mechanics problems designed to fit the three
designeducation3. TIDEE is “an interdisciplinary community of engineering design educatorscommitted to developing, implementing, and refining processes which lead to measurableimprovements in the readiness of our graduates for team-based design in the modernworkplace.” Over the last eight years TIDEE has provided regional leadership in designeducation that has resulted in:q Consensus on: • attributes of a quality engineer • learning outcomes associated with design • performance criteria at critical points in engineering degree programsq Best practices for: • designing curriculum for engineering design • creating assessment tools • facilitating student growth in professional skills • measuring student performance in a team-based
-efficacy beliefs in design, prototyping, making, and collaboration for middleschool students, so that students can develop positive attitudes towards processes that are integralto engineering.As identified in earlier work, students’ pre-collegiate experiences with engineering havesignificant impact on self-efficacy beliefs7. Fantz et al.7 conducted a quasi-experimental studywhere they surveyed engineering students’ 53 type of pre-collegiate experience with engineering,such as having robotics as a hobby, having formal engineering classes, or attending single/multi-day workshops; the researchers also used questionnaires to assess engineering students’ self-efficacy. For each of the 53 types of experiences, the researchers compared students
Paper ID #26415Academic Change from Theory to Practice: Examples from an EngineeringFaculty Development InstitutionDr. John Ray Morelock, University of Georgia Dr. John Morelock recently graduated from Engineering Education at Virginia Tech as a recipient of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. His dissertation studied the teaching practices of engineering in- structors during game-based learning activities, and how these practices affected student motivation. His research interests include engineering faculty development, student motivation, game-based teaching and learning, gamified classrooms, and engineering faculty
. Robin D Anderson, James Madison University Robin D. Anderson serves as the Academic Unit Head for the Department of Graduate Psychology at James Madison University. She holds a doctorate in Assessment and Measurement. She previously served as the Associate Director of the Center for Assessment and Research Studies at JMU. Her areas of research include assessment practice and engineering education research. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Validating a Sustainable Design Rubric by Surveying Engineering Educators: Comparing Professional Viewpoints with Established Sustainability
anecdotallyvalidated by many school hiring practices. Second, we did not want a school’s ranking to beimpacted by its own decisions; the ranking of a program has to be validated by decisions ofothers. Hence, we only consider the incoming edges of our hiring graph, i.e., only the Ph.D.shired by other programs impact its ranking. Third, the hiring graph is somewhat self-consistent inthe sense that we don’t need any external input in the process of ranking. For example, if we wereto consider hiring by industry, we would need to somehow have a notion of the relative value of a“Google hire” versus an “IBM hire”. Fourth, since the hiring slots tend to be few and expensive inresources, we postulate rankings based on hiring decisions are harder to “game”.There are
service-learning can be offered as part of students’ senior (capstone) design projects, when the NAE GCSPis not available to the students. Service-learning can facilitate the integration of applied research into the real-worldapplications [13]-[28]. This paper promotes research-informed service-learning approach inproject-based service-learning by integrating research into service-learning through education. Inthis paper, examples of research-informed practice for university graduate and undergraduateprojects are given, and service-learning is discussed as a powerful tool in education. The paperfurther discusses case studies of research-informed service-learning as a complementary approachto project-based curriculum and educational activities
J. Kerr, University of Tulsa Alison Kerr is a graduate student at The University of Tulsa. She is pursuing a doctoral degree in Industrial-Organizational Psychology. Her research interests include training development and evaluation as explored across a variety of academic disciplines and organizational settings. She is currently assist- ing on a number of training projects aimed at developing engineering students on relevant non-technical professional skills including ethical practice and presentation.Dr. Bradley J. Brummel, University of Tulsa Dr. Brummel is an Associate Professor of Industrial/Organizational Psychology at The University of Tulsa. He received his PhD from the University of Illinois at
. Putting theory into practice, she teaches a service-learning course at UCSC wherein interdisciplinary teams of students work in an layered apprenticeship model with community mentors to design and implement sustainable solutions to water, energy, waste, transportation and social challenges using ”green technology”. Dr. Ball has worked as a research fellow with two NSF Centers for Learning and Teaching and most recently on several NSF projects that focus the integration of engineering and social science to support the advancement of experiential learning for sustainability in higher education.Linnea Kristina Beckett, University of California - Santa Cruz Linnea Beckett is a PhD Candidate in Education at the University of
engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.ABET criteria a through k invite interpretation. This has been a source of concern for someeducators, but it has invited the IRRAE instructors to assess and articulate the research aims ofthe course and their applications to graduate work in engineering leadership. 2 Facility inresearch methodologies contribute to success in engineering professionalism: knowledge ofbasics, design of experiments, design of systems, problem analysis and solution, impact ofengineering work. It is also easy to see that research skills contribute to the professionalism of“life-long learning” and that the research tools increasingly available for secondary research are“necessary for engineering practice.”The