Session 1360 ESTABLISHING AND ASSESSING EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES FOR ENGINEERING PROGRAMS Nashwan Younis Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Department of Engineering Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne Fort Wayne, IN 46805-1499AbstractChanges are often very difficult. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) has changed the criteria for accrediting engineering programs. This paper describes theprocess for developing and assessing an engineering
undergraduate curriculum. Two specific criteria of the Accreditation Boardfor Engineering and Technology (ABET) such as the ability to formulate problems, andknowledge of contemporary issues, rely on a student’s ability to locate and synthesizeinformation in its various formats. Developing information literacy skills will allowstudents to exert more control over the structuring of their own learning within andbeyond the classroom. This discourse begins by examining some of the tangible and marketable benefitsof information literate engineering students. This is followed by an examination of asuccessful collaboration between an engineering faculty and a librarian in the instructionof undergraduate and graduate students in becoming more
AC 2012-4402: IMPROVEMENTS IN COMPUTATIONAL METHODS COURSESIN CHEMICAL ENGINEERINGDr. Joshua A. Enszer, University of Maryland Baltimore County Joshua Enszer is a full-time lecturer in chemical engineering at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control and modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarnations: electronic port- folios as a means for assessment and professional development, implementation of computational tools across the chemical engineering curriculum, and game-based
filled by instructors from other faculties who do notcontribute to the engineering program. By integrating a communications instructor into afirst year program, and specifying three distinct but complementary roles for saidinstructor, S____ School of Engineering has created an atypical, but beneficial position,one that ensures a high quality of instruction for students and a stronger, more focusededucational team.Bibliography1. Universities surveyed include University of Toronto, University of Alberta, University of Western Ontario, University of Waterloo, University of British Columbia, MIT, California Institute of Technology, Texas A&M, Michigan State and others.2. Wikoff, K., Friauf, J., Tran, H., Reyer, S., Petersen, O
suggests thatas much as half a course could be devoted to these topics as core material included in everycomputer engineering program. An expedient way in which this can be done is to require a 3-hour core course in "Embedded Systems and Real Time Programming" as part of the computerengineering curriculum.Hughes and Nelson1 define computer engineering as the following: "Computer engineering embodies the science and the technology of design, construction, implementation and maintenance of the hardware and the software components of modern computing systems and computer-controlled equipment. Computer engineers are solidly grounded in the theories and principles of computing, mathematics and engineering, and apply these theoretical
. Page 9.1414.6 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationBiographical InformationKevin Dahm in an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. fromWorcester Polytechnic Institute in 1992 and his Ph.D. from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1998. Hiscurrent primary teaching interest is integrating process simulation throughout the chemical engineering curriculum,and he received the 2003 Joseph J. Martin Award for work in this area.Ravi P. Ramachandran is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering atRowan University
preparing students for a future of rapid technological changeand globalization.The major goals of this project are to answer four specific research questions: • RQ1: What factors contribute to students’ motivation to pursue engineering? • RQ2: How do motivational attributes correlate to learning and cognition in engineering, especially problem-solving and knowledge transfer? • RQ3: How do motivational attributes change over time as knowledge, experience and skills in one’s field develop? • RQ4: What relationship, if any, do the particular aspects of bioengineering (BioE) and mechanical engineering (ME) have to motivation, learning and cognition in those
Your Car,” Scientific American, December, pp. 112-115.6. McMahon, T. A., and Bonner, J. T., 1983, “On Size and Life,” Scientific American Books, Inc., New York, N.Y.7. Alexander, R. M., 1992, “Exploring Biomechanics: Animal Locomotion,” Scientific American Library, New York, N.Y.8. Kolecki, J., “Estimation Problems,” www.grc.nasa.gov. Click on Education, Learning Technologies Project, and Mathematical Thinking in Physics to reach estimation problems. Page 10.587.6 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright @ 2005, American Society for
marketing period. There are manyimportant studies, such as concurrent engineering have been performed about this subject andthese studies have been successfully integrated to the conventional design process1. As a resultof the growth of the companies, departments could be located in the different places and far fromeach other, so that the professionals have less and limited opportunity for face to facecommunication and brainstorming. Therefore, it is a necessity to modify and adapt classicalmethods to the current situation. Developments, especially on the communication andinformation technology, increase the adaptation possibility of conventional methods to the newsituations. It is very well known that, the computer is an important device for
Teams Proceedings, Thomas Walter Center for Technology Management, 1996.[2] Bowen, D.M., Site visit to Colorado University, 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, Colorado, November, 2003.[3] Bowen, D.M, Alvaro, M., Mejia, D., and Saffi, M., “Team Skills of Engineers – Do We Teach What Industry Wants?,” International Conference on Engineering Education, Gainesville, Florida, October, 2004.[4] Caenepeel, C., and Wyrick, C., “Strategies for Successful Interdisciplinary Projects: A California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, Perspective,” International Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 391-395, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2001.[5] Hirsch, P.L., et.al., “Engineering Design and Communication: The Case for
State Teaching andLearning Consortium. The web site design and the interactive editor were created by Ken Kubiak.Bibliography1 The Engineering Case Library (ECL) by the Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) of ASEE, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and Carleton University. Contact: Richard A. Layton, P.E., Ph.D., Rose-HulmanInstitute of Technology.Biographical InformationLAURA L. PAULEY is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State University, University Park. Since2000, she has also served as the Professor-in-Charge of Undergraduate Programs in Mechanical and NuclearEngineering. Dr. Pauley teaches courses in the thermal sciences and conducts research in computational fluidmechanics. She received her Ph.D. from Stanford
Session 1475 Faculty Development – The Future of Engineering Education Noel N. Schulz and Kirk H. Schulz Bagley College of Engineering Mississippi State UniversityABSTRACTThe economic woes of the last several years have hit universities hard. Endowments havelittle or no return. Corporate funding is harder to get. More and more people arecompeting for National Science Foundation dollars where supply is not meeting thisincreased demand. Operating budgets have been reduced providing little or no travelfunds for faculty. Senior faculty who often teach multiple classes are
Postgraduate School. His primary academic andpedagogical interests are in the areas of distance/asynchronous learning technologies and methods, object-orientedprogramming, and object-oriented modeling.REVEREND JOSEPH K. GOODMAN, Undergraduate engineering student in the Bradley School of Electrical andComputer Engineering at VPI & SU. Reverend Goodman’s interests and experience include the area of networkdesign and administration, interactive web server design and programming, and public licensed software. Page 9.955.8
Writing: A Case Study", Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, Vol.24, No.1, Winter 1994, p.9. Andrew Goodwyn, English in the digital age: information and communications technology (ICT) and the teaching of English, London: Cassell, 2000 Page 9.554.5 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education” Ronald L.Miller and Barbara Olds, "A Model Curriculum for A Capstone Course in Multidisciplinary Engineering Design". Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.83
. Page 8.85.6 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”6 Ipsaro, A. J. (1997). White Men, Women, & Minorities in the Changing Work Force: Race, Sex, Power,Technology, Global Markets, Innovation. Denver, CO: Meridian Associates. BiographyDENISE M. DRISCOLL, PhD, is a social psychologist with 8 years of experience as a faculty member teachingand researching the processes involved in changing stereotypes and prejudice, as well as 6 years of experience asan administrator in the Diversity Resource Office directing projects, writing grants, and
broader skills needed to prosper in the twenty-first century.”Eleanor Baum of the Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art suggests that "Wewill expect engineers to have a background well beyond technology and science…the biggestchange for universities will be to turn engineering into a liberal art”4. Baum claims engineers arehired for their analytical and problem-solving skills more than their technical skills. Yetcommunication skills are equally important because information becomes knowledge only whenconclusions drawn from analyses and potential solutions to problems are effectivelycommunicated to those who need to make decisions or implement solutions. Sister Joel Read,President of Alverno College states that “When problems arise
Engineering Education: An Integrated Writing andCommunication Program for Materials Engineers.” Journal of Engineering Education, 85:4:343-352.LISA LEBDUSKA is Director of the Center for Communication Across the Curriculum and an adjunct assistantprofessor of writing at WPI. She received her PhD in English from the University of Rhode Island. Her most recentarticle, “Peer Writing Tutors,” will be appear in Student-Assisted Teaching by Anker Publishing, and reflects herresearch in peer tutor training, writing in the disciplines, and technologies of writing.DAVID DIBIASIO is Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering and assessment coordinator for theInterdisciplinary and Global Studies Division at WPI. He received his PhD in chemical engineering from
systems design, and desiccant technology. He serves as Director of the MSU Industrial Assessment Centerand was the ASEE Southeastern Section President for 1999-2000.W. G. STEELEW. G. Steele is a Giles Distinguished Professor and Professor and Head of Mechanical Engineering at MississippiState University. He received degrees in mechanical engineering from MSU (BS) and North Carolina StateUniversity (MME and Ph.D.) and has industrial experience with Westinghouse (Bettis Atomic Power Lab). Sincejoining the faculty at MSU in 1979 he has pioneered the use of uncertainty analysis in experimentation and design,has authored the leading book on the uncertainty in experimentation, and has served on national and internationalcommittees concerned with
, organization and production systems must be shared with the educational community.Only when we, as educators, have properly inspired our students’ minds can we feel that we aredoing our share to help continue this country’s competitive engineering edge in the twenty-firstcentury global economy.Bibliography1. Amrine, H. T., Ritchey, J. A., Moodie, C. L., & Kmec, J. F. Manufacturing Organization and Management.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1993.2. Kalpakjian, S. & Schmid, S. R. Manufacturing Engineering and Technology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, Inc. 2001.3. Schey, J. A. Introduction to Manufacturing Processes 3/e. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill PublishingCompany. 1999.4. Tlusty, G. Manufacturing Processes
Education, Vol. 83, No. 4, Oct 1994.Biographical InformationFAHMIDA MASOOM is a Lecturer in the College of Engineering, Mathematics and Science. She graduated from theUniversity of Rajshahi, Bangladesh with a B.Sc. Honors in Applied Physics in 1983. She completed her M.S. (1986) inEngineering Mechanics at the University of Wisconsin. Fahmida taught at Savannah State College in Georgia for twoyears before coming to UW-Platteville. Her research interests are in the areas of Digital Design.ABULKHAIR MASOOM is a Professor in the College of Engineering, Mathematics and Science. He graduated fromBangladesh University of Engineering and Technology with a B.Sc. in ME in 1977. He completed an M. Eng inMechanical and Aeronautical Engineering at Carleton
. 44, No. 1, 1999, pp. 110-125. 6. Hartman, J. C., “Engineering Economy: Suggestions to Update a Stagnant Course Curriculum”, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, 1998. 7. Bafna, K. and Aller, B., “Enhancing the Learning of Engineering Economy with Innovative Technology and Teaching,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, 2007. 8. Coates, E. R., Vajpayee, S. K., and Juneau, J., “Introducing Engineering Economy Students to Real Options”, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, 2003. 9. Evans, E., Nachtmann, H., and Needy K., “A Look into Engineering Economy Education Literature”, American Society for
-year’s effort was therefore devoted to a self study.SignificanceThe significance of this study revolves around five issues.• This study provides an example of the difference between the research paradigms known as phenomenology and phenomenography.• It provides an example of how research methodologies developed for use in science education can be adapted for institutional research that provides a basis for the self-study required by accrediting agencies such as NCA (The North Central Association Commission on Institutions of Higher Education) and ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology).• It provides an example of cross-discipline curriculum reform efforts that involve not only
Session #1617 Geometric Conceptualization In the Architectural Engineering Curriculum Katherine A. Liapi The University of Texas at AustinAbstractGeometric conceptualization has always been among the essential mental tools requiredfor the invention and modeling of spatial structures, as well as for the structural, spatialand dimensional coordination in buildings. The downplayed role of geometry in mostarchitectural engineering curricula may be responsible for engineering students’ lowperformance in geometric conceptualization and visualization. This paper presents
Session 2557 Interdisciplinary Teams? An Industrial Engineering/Physical Therapy Project Dennis E. Kroll1, Ph.D., Andrew J. Strubhar2 1 Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering & Technology 2 Physical Therapy Bradley University Peoria, IllinoisAbstractAt the 1995 ASEE Annual Conference, we reported on a newly developed project combining 4thsemester Industrial Engineering students and 8th semester Physical Therapy(PT) students.[3]This project required them to
without a real design and testing inthe lab. Excitement and anticipation could always be noticed on the day of testing. Loadingprojects to failure or crushing concrete specimens was always the highlight of any event. Itdrew the loudest cheer, and one could feel the emotional attachment between the teams andtheir projects. Almost all the students who did these projects in the past few years felt that thegrading criteria was fair. These projects are regularly reviewed and upgraded to incorporatenew rules related to the latest methods of design and testing.Bibliography1. “Engineering Criteria 2000, Third Edition,” Engineering Accreditation Commission of The Accreditation Boardfor Engineering and Technology, December 1997ASHRAF M. GHALY
; • Student-teacher interaction is reduced in an off-campus program, but can be maximized through effective use of the Internet and electronic mail; • Instructors must plan to allocate additional time and effort for planning and preparing courses, as well as for commuting to the classroom location. Page 5.582.6Bibliography1. Lewis, V.W. Jr. (1997). “Expectations of On-Campus and Remote Students in a Course in Civil Engineering Technology.” Proceedings of the 1997 ASEE Annual Conference, American Society for Engineering Education, Milwaukee, WI, June 15-18.2. Lowman, J. (1995). Mastering the Techniques of Teaching. Jossey-Bass
ConferenceProceedings.11. Martinazzi R. and Samples, J., “Using Active Learning to Teach Technical and Non-Technical Skills in theSame Course”, 1997 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings.12. Katzenback, Jon R. & Smith, Douglas K., “The Wisdom of Teams”, Harvard Business School Press, Boston,MA., 1993.ROBERT MARTINAZZIAssociate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown. B.S.Aerospace Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, M.S. Mechanical Engineering from Carnegie MellonUniversity. Registered professional engineer. Interest include engineering economics, management and leadershipdevelopment. Worked as project engineer for Armstrong World Industries, does engineering managementconsulting work
. and Jennings, A.A., “A Hydraulic Barrier Design Teaching Module Based on HELP 3.04 and HELP Model for Windows V2.05”, Environmental Modelling and Software, (in press), 1998.Roy, D., Jennings, A.A. and Maillacheruvu, K.,“Air Pollution Transport Teaching Modules”, Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, June 28 - July 1,1998, (in press). Page 3.378.7Biographical Information Dr. Jennings is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Case Western Reserve University.He received his undergraduate degree from the Rochester Institute of Technology in 1975,his M.S. degree from the University of
Session 2570 Internal and External Challenges for Minority Engineering Programs Mary Ann McCartney, Maria A. Reyes, Mary R. Anderson-Rowland Arizona State UniversityAbstractThe Office of Minority Engineering Programs (OMEP) in the College of Engineering andApplied Sciences (CEAS) at Arizona State University (ASU) is a growing support system forunderrepresented minority students and others. Nearly 500, approximately 14%, of theundergraduate students in the CEAS are underrepresented minorities (African Americans,Hispanics, and Native Americans). During the Fall 1995 semester, the OMEP served over 300students
of the week, the 21 differentteams tested their designs in an exciting, head to head competition game entitled Robo-Guard.Robotics Games As a ToolGames are fun and sports are exciting. By presenting engineering as a sport, engineering can beviewed as an inclusive, interesting, and exciting activity. While having roots as the MIT 2.70Design Course, many institutions have recognized the value of hands-on design competitions toteach engineering design. Nationally, the original MIT 2.70 design contest has been developedas an engineering outreach project known as FIRST (For Inspiration and Recognition of Scienceand Technology) that teams industry engineers with high school students to build sophisticatedrobots capable of playing mechanical sports