adequate communication skills, and ABET specifically requires this as part of the outcomes assessment criteria. Admittedly, some universities include their communication courses on a larger list of electives that were included as humanities electives. • B: Humanities – most programs had some breadth requirement that included courses in political science, economics, history, psychology, sociology, etc. • C: Math and Science – these courses included math (calculus, statistics, differential equations), basic science (chemistry, physics, biology, ecology), and computer science where the emphasis is on programming or computer theory rather than CAD drawing or computer applications. • D
humanities, economics, political science, language and/or interdisciplinary technical subjects is not in the best interest of producing engineers able to communicate with the public, able to engage in a global engineering marketplace or trained to be life long learners.” (NAE 2005)The CAP^3 is actively engaged on many fronts as the implementation plan for PolicyStatement 465 moves forward. Referring to the master plan and the description of thecurrent and on-going committee, we have five broad goals to accomplish over the nextfive years. The goals are: 1. Secure a state to adopt B+30 for the educational requirements to be licensed; 2. Publish the Second Edition of Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge by February
, Salt Lake City, UT, June 20-23, 2004.2. J.S. Norback and J.R. Hardin. “Integrating Workforce Communication into Senior Design Tutorial.” IEEETransactions on Professional Communication, v 48 n 4 (December 2005): 413-426.3. N. Sommers and N. Saltz. “The Novice as Expert: Writing the Freshman Year.” College Composition andCommunication v 56 n 1 (September 2004). 124-149.4. E. Lindemann. A Rhetoric for Writing Teachers, 4th edition. Oxford UP, 2001.5. J. A. Reither. “Writing and Knowing: Toward Redefining the Writing Process.” College English 47 (October1985), 620-28.6. P. Hirsch, H.D. Smith, G. Birol, B. Yalvac, J. Casler, J. Anderson, and J. Troy. Establishing School-Wide
.” Donna furthercompares her work ethic to her American peers: “Like one of my American friends, hewas like, ‘Doesn’t matter’, you know, and I’m fighting down my B’s and getting B’s, anddoing everything that I can to not get a B….so when they say they’ll get a C whereas formost of us … C’s aren’t enough, …, we don’t want to even see that… You could tellbasically by their mentality in class and by the way they deal with work and assignmentsand stuff like that.”The acknowledgement of these differences was also cited by the African Americanengineering students. Morris, an African American civil engineering student discussedgender differences, but made special mention of African Caribbean female students.“…a lot of females don’t choose this major… So
global market influenced by geopolitics. Sterile re-sources are dealth with extensively in resource economics (e.g., e.g. Conradxxi Clark, xxii Neh-rerxxiii).Renewable Living Resources: In this category we include fisheries and forests, and living popu- Page 12.846.9lations in general. All share the possibility of multiple steady states, where harvesting balances Page 8 of 18growth. The search for good sustainable states involves the search for: a) control of the harvest-ing; b) monitoring mechanisms of the resource itself; c) a theory which explains natural variabil
, March 5, 7). The insidious charms of foreign investment.6. Economist (2005b, March 5, 16). Rivals and partners.7. Mehlman (2004). Assistance secretary technology policy united states of commerceOutsourcing and the future of American competitiveness. Offshore.8. Bartels, F. L. (n.d.) Outsourcing markets in services: International business trends, patternsand emerging issues. Vienna: UNIDO.9. Bengtsson, L. (2001). Analysis of a learning dilemma. Outsourcing Manufacturing.10. Mehlman, B. (2005). Outsourcing and the future of American competitiveness11. Bryce, D., & Useem, M. (1998). The impact of corporate outsourcing on company value.European Management.12. Bardhan, A., & Kroll, C. (2003). The new wave of outsourcing. Fisher Center
AC 2007-220: EXPERIENCES AND EXPECTATIONS OF DOCTORALINSTITUTION FACULTY COLLABORATING ACROSS DISCIPLINESMaura Borrego, Virginia Tech MAURA BORREGO is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and 2005 Rigorous Research in Engineering Education evaluator. Dr. Borrego holds an M.S. and Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Stanford University. Her current research interests center around interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering and engineering education, including studies of the collaborative relationships between engineers and education researchers. She was recently awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study interdisciplinarity in engineering graduate
Non-Hispanic, Black 5 Non-Hispanic, Black 4 Non-Hispanic, Black 2 Non-Hispanic, White 10 Non-Hispanic, White 8 Non-Hispanic, White 7 Page 12.1426.3 Table 1: Enrollment analysisProgram ResultsAll 29 students completing the 2006 Program received productive grades and college credit forboth courses. The distribution of final grades is presented in Table 2 below. Productive A B C D F W
AC 2007-596: UNDERSTANDING ABET OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMESOwe Petersen, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Petersen is Department Chair and Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He is a former Member of Technical Staff at AT&T Bell Laboratories and received his Ph.D. degrees from the University of Pennsylvania in 1971. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE and an ABET EAC program evaluator in Electrical Engineering.Stephen Williams, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Stephen Williams is Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He received the Ph.D. degree
Swaminathan is currently working on his Ph.D degree in Chemical Engineering at the Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN 38505. His research is to critically evaluate the pure component parameterization methodologies in equation of state modeling and their effect on mixture phase predictions. He received his B.Tech degree from University of Madras (India) and his MS degree from Tennessee Technological University.Lisa Zagumny, Tennessee Technological Univesity Lisa Zagumny is Assistant Professor of Qualitative Research, Educational Anthropology, Foundations, Tennessee Tech University, Box 5042, Cookeville, TN 38505; email lzagumny@tntech.edu. Her research interests overlap with a concern
American Society of Civil Engineers supports the attainmentof a Body of Knowledge (BOK) for entry into the practice of civil engineering at the professionallevel.” To promulgate an aspirational vision, support Policy 465, and be successfullyimplemented, the civil engineering BOK must specifically define the knowledge, skills, andattitudes of the future civil engineer. This paper describes the inclusive process being used todevelop the second edition of the BOK expected for the future practice of civil engineering. Thesecond edition of the BOK (BOK2) builds on the first edition of the BOK, which was released in2004. The BOK2 is the foundation on which tomorrow’s civil engineering accreditation criteriaand individual program curricula will be
. W., Parrott, S. A., Korn, W. S. & Sax, L. J. (1997). The American freshman: Thirty-year trends. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.6. Vetter, B., & Baboo, E. (1989). Professional women and minorities: a manpower data resource service. 6th ed. Washington D.C.: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology.7. AAUW (American Association of University Women). 2002. Tech-Savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age. Washington, D.C.: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.8. Cooper, J., Weaver, K. D. (2003). Gender and Computers, Mahwah, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum.9. Oakes, J. (1990). Opportunities, Achievement, and Choice: Women and Minority Students in
Page 12.906.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Instructional Strategies and Tools to Teach Six Sigma to Engineering Technology Undergraduate StudentsAbstractThis paper presents innovative instructional strategies and tools to teach Six Sigma toEngineering Technology undergraduate students. Six Sigma is an improvement methodologyfocusing on understanding and reducing variation in processes. Many students can easily learnand even apply the basic quality tools in a separate and non-integrated manner, but the realchallenge is to help the students learn and apply the tools of Six Sigma in a synthesized way toattain the true power of an integrated approach. This paper will discuss the
Tech he was Executive Director of the Technological Research and Development Authority of the State of FloridaClifford Bragdon, Florida Tech Dr. Clifford Bragdon is the Dean of the University College at Florida Tech. He has extensive natioan and international experience in creation of Aeropolis communities.P.N. Vaidy Vaidyanathan, University of Central Florida Pallavoor N. Vaidy Vaidyanathan is the Assistant VP for Research at the University of Central Florida.Tom O'Neal, University of Central Florida Dr. Tom O'Neal is the Associate VP for Research at the University of Central Florida and the CEO of the UCF Technology Incubator.Dennis Kulonda, Florida Tech Dennis Kulonda is a
regional/international one. 7. There is a possibility of resistance to foreign scrutiny. 8. There is consensus that accreditation should allow mobility. There are various mechanisms for this, including signatory status of the Washington Accord. 9. There are two alternatives for achieving global recognition: a. Develop a national/regional accreditation system, and then sign an accord, b. Adopt an existing accreditation system (e.g. British or American) 10. There is a possibility of incest in national accreditation systems, especially in small countries. 11. There is a certain degree of difficulty in joining consortia such as the Washington Accord; even more so for individual countries. 12. Various
Cornell University. The study was part of a research investigating the Page 12.197.4effects of wireless computing in collaborative learning environments. Two groups of studentsheard the same lecture; group A was allowed to open their laptops while group B was not.Immediately after the lecture a test of traditional measures of memory for lecture content wasperformed. Investigators found that students in group A suffered decrements in informationretention compared to those in group B. Statistical significant differences were found in therecall and total scores. However, differences only approach statistical significance in therecognition part of
outcomes, Clarkson University has adopted anoutcomes based set of graduation requirements. .The Clarkson Common Experience unifies eachstudent's learning in a major field of study with learning expectations that broaden the student'sunderstanding of our modern world. Graduates are expected to meet outcomes in fundamentalacademic abilities, in personal and social development, and in prescribed areas of knowledge.While some outcomes may be achieved in a single course, the Common Experience Curriculumidentifies four components that serve as common threads through multiple courses. These are:(a) learning to communicate effectively, (b) developing an appreciation for diversity in bothworking and living environments, (c) recognizing the importance of
. There is alsospace for additional comments, such as added objectives. An example of the survey for onecourse is given in Figure 3 in the Appendix. The report for this survey includes the number ofcheck marks in each box with all comments.The third survey is over the entire curriculum and is done in the fall of odd years. This survey isgiven in Figure 4 a and b in the appendix. The board is asked to rate how important our courses,both non-engineering and engineering, are for attaining the Program Objectives. The page fornon-engineering courses is shown in Figure 4a; the similar page for engineering courses is notgiven here. The board members are given space to recommend other courses. They are alsoasked to rate how well our students who
inengineering? and (2) What are the factors that attract women to and help them to persist in acareer in engineering? The methods consisted of a search of related research to identify probablyfactors followed by qualitative interviews with program persisters and switchers. The mostfrequently cited factors were selected for inclusion in the interview protocol for the qualitativeportion of this study. They were: (a) faculty support, (b) class environment, (c) departmentenvironment, (d) attraction to another discipline, (e) parental encouragement, and (f) self-confidence. The result was an evaluation of the relative merits of the factors for persisters andswitchers. Additionally a new metaphor relating to force field analysis is proposed. Thismetaphor was
goals of the Partnership for ImplementingEngineering Education were achieved and will hopefully be used to assist many educators in thefuture as technology and engineering become increasingly important throughout the world.References1. B. Mathias-Riegel, “Engineering that’s elementary.” ASEE Prism, Mar 2001.2. E. Barney Smith, R. Miller, “Education by Design: Connecting Engineering and Elementary Education.” ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI, January 2006.3. J. E. Miller, J. J. Rencis, “A University/Public School Partnership in K-6 Engineering Education.” ASEE 2004 Annual Conference & Exposition.4. K. Bush, J. Gray, M. Holmes, K. Kosinski, J. Orr, L. Razzaq, J. Rulfs, , “How do you Teach Engineering in Kindergarten and First Grade
ofteaching and effectiveness of professors. A research study was conducted in SPSU ConstructionDepartment to examine the teaching effectiveness. The spatial transferability of the facultyevaluation mechanisms, without regard to spatial socio-cultural differences, is discussed in thisstudy based on the collected data and following a thorough literature review and statisticalanalysis. The result of this study is the extension of the previous year study. It was found thatstudents’ GPA has direct relations with their perceptions regarding teaching evaluations.Students with higher GPAs are against missing lectures by faculty and disapprove the acceptanceof a lower class performance by faculty. Instead, they favor such course and faculty traits ashaving
. Ukulele strumming b. Bongos drumming c. Bass playing d. Band swaying together 2. Bear Dancer a. Hula bear “hula shake” swinging hips or rolling hips 3. Penguin sliding down the hill 4. Big polar bear skater (in the front) 5. Baby penguin waving a signRefer to Fig. 5 for various mechanisms and Fig. 6 and Fig.7 for scaled drawings of the entirefloat. A few of the mechanisms from the above list are discussed briefly below. Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference Copyright © 2007, American Society for Engineering Fig 5 – Layout showing Animation Systems Fig 6
fourhighest rated competencies were organizing the communication, displaying sufficient generalknowledge about the topic, showing confidence, and adjusting to the audience. Manypublications have described competencies that students should acquire to become goodcommunicators 13, 14, 15. Based on the employer input and communication skills literature, webelieve that the following competencies are core to oral communications: (a) Content-development skills, i.e., competence in ideation generation, amplification, and organization; (b) Presentation skills, i.e., competence in generating interest, sustaining attention, using appropriate language, and being clear 14; (c) Receptive skills, i.e., listening and interpretive competence; and (d
Suppress DIM line 2 on Text Alignment: Dimension line Precision: 0.00" Suppress EXT line 1 on Prefix: R= Suppress EXT line 2 on Suffix: lbs. 11. Select F1 layer from layer controls 12. Press L enter 13. Type 2.0,2.0 in response to Specify first point 14. Type @3.0<45 enter 15. Press Esc 16. Click Single line text from the Draw pull down menu and label point A and B (Arrowheads can be added by using Quick Leader in dimensioning) Proceedings
. Page 12.697.6 5To accelerate and standardize the evaluation procedure, the Office of Admissions and School ofEngineering administration decided to initiate the implementation of a prototype for a software toolto automatically rank and select candidates to the graduate program in Computer Science; since asignificantly high number of applications is submitted to this program every semester.The proposed DEA model in this study aims at (i) accepting students (a) with efficiency scores equalor higher than a predetermined technical efficiency value or (b) up to a given number, (ii) comparingthe accepted students with the DEA model results, and, (iii) preparing a base to observe the
AC 2007-1076: NON-TRADITIONAL BACHELOR DEGREE PROGRAMS ANDOPTIONS OFFERED BY ENGINEERING SCHOOLS: THEIR IMPACT ONTRADITIONAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMSE. Bernard White, George Mason University E. Bernard White received the Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degree from the University of Virginia (Charlottesville) in Systems Engineering. He has studied at a wide range of universities, earning bachelor and master degrees in mathematics from Mississippi Industrial College and the University of Illinois (Urbana), respectively. He earned a master degree in Urban Systems Engineering from Howard University (Washington, D.C.). Mr. White worked as a research engineer and assistant professor in the Howard
, November 2002.[33] Koppel, N. B., Cano, R. M., Heyman, S. B., and Kimmel, H. (2003). “Single Gender Programs: Do they Makea Difference?” Proceedings of the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO, November2003.[34] Cano, R., Berliner-Heyman, S., Koppel, N., Gibbons, S., Kimmel, H. (2004). “Evaluation of SummerEnrichment Programs for Womens’ Students”, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference & Exposition.[35] Hirsch, L. S., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R. and Bloom, J. (2006). “A Study of the Impact of Enrichment Programson Girls’ Attitudes Towards Engineering”. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on EngineeringEducation, San Juan, PR, July 2006
shown in Fig.2. The labs includes safety, proper use of hand and power tools, blueprint reading and sketching,precision measuring and layout, setup, operation, clean-up and basic maintenance of the lathe,milling machine and surface grinders and basic introduction to CNC setup and operation. a) Basic Machining Processes b) Advanced Computer Numerical Controlled Machining Figure 2. Students learning the machining process.Welding Laboratory: This laboratory allows students to gain knowledge and skills in cutting,arc welding, MIG and TIG welding and provides some exposure to oxy-acetylene cutting andwelding as shown in Fig. 3. The labs includes safety, blueprint reading and sketching, tools andmaterials
AC 2007-2296: BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS: INTEGRATING THEUNDERGRADUATE INTO THE FACULTY LABORATORYDavid Barnett, Saint Louis UniversityRebecca Willits, Saint Louis University Page 12.313.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Biomedical Engineering Projects: Integrating the Undergraduate into the Faculty LaboratoryAbstractOpportunities for undergraduate students to become involved in faculty research and designprojects can vary widely by institution. We have developed a senior projects sequence thatenables students to complete a yearlong faculty sponsored project that immerses the student inthe laboratory. While a majority of
. a. How it works b. For whom it works c. Its deployment: market value or other measure of value d. Its competition e. The trends f. The tradeoffs: strongest and weakest features (what the critics say) g. List references 3. The topic may be on technologies such as high intensity white LED lights, or microbial disposal of toxic waste, or on a major project (system), such as the Three Gorges or (saving) Venice. It could also focus on a failure like the Columbia Shuttle, or the New Orleans levees. See helpful links below. 4. Note: Some generic technology families like explosives, or nanotechnology, may appear to have no competition. They do.Comments