institution developed and uses mentoring to provide a structuredprogram of different engagement activities. These efforts focus on creating a culture of opencommunications among engineering students, and on increasing engagement of engineeringstudents with faculty, engineering professionals, and peers to develop resiliency and persistencetowards earning an engineering degree and pursing an engineering career. Included is therationale for each activity, together with a brief summary of how it is being implemented.Statistical and observational survey data as evidence to the success or effectiveness of theseefforts is presented and discussed, with particular attention focused on evidence of studentretention. Analysis of examples of mentoring activities
characterize teaching and what attributes do they possess thatalign with attributes of teachers? Information from program applications and electronicquestionnaires were our data sources. The questionnaire asked about background, demographics,reasons for pursuing a teaching internship, attributes of professionals in teaching and in STEM,previous internship experiences, whether they felt a sense of belonging in their currentdepartment, and future goals. Results showed that most interns have various reasons for pursingthe internship opportunity, have considerable experiences working with youth, want to teach atsome point in their careers, and feel a sense of belonging in their STEM departments. Mostinterns also highlighted different attributes needed to
obtainingengineering degrees and to enter the workforce as engineers.1 For the past three years, the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) student chapter at IndianaUniv./Purdue Univ. Ft. Wayne (IPFW) has been active in a number of functions to increase the sense ofcommunity, self-confidence, and mentoring among female engineering, technology, and computer sciencestudents. They have been active in recruiting a wide range of students, including both traditional andnontraditional female engineering, technology, and computer science students. Entering freshmen havebeen targeted through introductory letters, visibility during the orientation/registration process, andclassroom visits. SWE activities, including picnics, guest speakers, plant tours, career days for
organizations provide a great opportunity for undergraduate students toform collaborative study groups. Because these organizations are comprised of studentsin all classes, freshmen through seniors and even graduate students, students are able towork with other students to study for exams and assist in the understanding of homeworkproblems and course content. Lastly, guest speakers are routinely incorporated into regularly scheduledorganizational meetings. These speakers are often industry professionals, local officials,and career development staff. Roundtable discussions between student group membersand a panel of young engineers are great ways for students to ask questions about careeropportunities, expectations, interview insights, and other
teacher for 2009-2010. She received the WEPAN Engineering Educator Award 2009, ASEE Minorities Award 2006, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005, and the National En- gineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by AAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of Women Engineers. Her awards are based on her mentoring of students, especially women and underrepresented minority students, and her research in the areas of re- cruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Ms. Anita Grierson, Arizona State University Anita Grierson, AZ State University ANITA E. GRIERSON is the Director of the METS Center in
College, aHispanic-Serving community college in Redwood City, collaborated with San Francisco StateUniversity, a comprehensive urban university, to design and implement the summer engineeringinstitute which is funded by the US Department of Education’s Minority Science andEngineering Improvement Program (MSEIP) grant to increase the likelihood of success amongunderrepresented and educationally disadvantaged students interested in pursuing careers inSTEM fields. Prior to its partnership with Cañada College, SFSU has many years of experiencein offering an engineering residential program funded by the California Department ofTransportation (Caltrans). With the newly funded grant from the DOE, the Summer EngineeringInstitute has been designed and
inhospitable to transitions and career paths that fall outside the dominant narrative ofthat story.This research explores the professional transitions experienced by an engineering facultymember across role types, discipline affiliations, and institution types. Though personal andfamilial transitions were also occurring, the scope of the research is major professionaltransitions initiated by an engineering faculty member (e.g., change in institution, change indepartment, change in role title or type), rather than those related to tenure and promotion,administration, and retirement. Existing studies of faculty transitions tend to focus on careerprogression for tenure-track faculty members, transitions into the academy, transitions into thediscipline of
to provide experiencedalumni help to the students in their professional development and in identifying and navigatingtheir career paths. The program was structured by annually forming 11-12 mentoring circles,each containing three mentors (most typically, one member who was a member of the ArkansasAcademy of Chemical Engineers and graduated at least 20 years ago, and two other alumni whograduated 5-10 years ago) and 4-6 students that are all in the same year of school. Studentparticipation in the program is voluntary and just under 50% of our students participate annually.Following the program kick-off soon after school starts in the Fall semester, the circles averagefour mentoring events during the Fall semester, followed by a final Program
, more women are currently encouraged topursue construction as their professional fields. This study examines potential associationsbetween gender and students' motivations for joining the construction program, the obstaclesthey encounter, their expectations, and their future career plans. Data from all first, second, andthird-year students in the Building Construction Science (BCS) program at Mississippi StateUniversity were collected using a quantitative survey. The survey covered different aspects ofstudents’ experiences and decisions. The results showed that both male and female students wereattracted to the program because of job opportunities, relatively high salary, and the challengingnature of the program. However, there were some clear
during orientation week.• Students shared stories about their cultural heritage.• Open discussion on how cultural heritage shaped educational experiences.• Fostered a sense of community and belonging.CAREER READINESSHands-on projects and activities.Exploring different career paths.Developing professional skills.Connecting with industry professionals. EXAMPLE OF HANDS-ON PROJECTProject: Mock Business Activity: Industry Job Startup. Shadowing Day.Mock BusinessStartup ProjectOverview• Market Research: Analyzed industry trends, customer needs, and competition.• Business Strategy: Developed value proposition, target markets, and marketing plan.• Financial Planning: Created budgets, forecasted
Paper ID #38513Challenging the Notion of Role Models in Engineering Outreach Programsfor Youth (Fundamental)Dr. Kelli Paul, Indiana University-Bloomington Dr. Kelli Paul is an Assistant Research Scientist at the Center for Research on Learning and Technology at Indiana University where her research focuses on the development of STEM interests, identity, and career aspirations in children and adolescents.Dr. Karen Miel, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Karen Miel’s research focuses on PK-16 students’ reasoning and decision-making in collaborative engi- neering design and the ways educators facilitate
students in grades six through eight to measure their self-reported attitudes inmathematics, science, engineering and technology. The results showed a significant increase incampers’ self-perceived attitude in mathematics. In addition, semi-structured interviews wereconducted with 22 campers to explore how the camp experiences altered attitudes toward STEMstudy and impacted their career interest. Interview findings indicated (1) campers hadopportunities to develop STEM, robotics, and programming knowledge through various hands-on activities which made the camp fun and interesting, (2) teamwork and single-gender learningenvironment helped campers become more open to STEM subjects, and (3) coding andprogramming were two major themes in miniGEMS that
Charles and Bradley are the first to conduct a robust study of gender segregation in avariety of fields across 44 countries, using their Gender Essentialist and Self-Expressive ValueSystems Framework.1 The study’s counter intuitive findings suggested that gender segregation infields traditionally regarded as ‘masculine’, such as engineering, is much more pronounced inadvanced industrialized countries like the US. They found that cultural beliefs in fundamentaland innate gender differences express themselves in curricular and career choice moreprevalently in economically developed countries where self-expression and individualism incurricular and career choice is highly valued, in contrast to less economically developedcountries where curricular
, including: During each WBE, STL was found to occur, regular STIR dialogs supportedSTL, and STL strengthened self-efficacy. These and other qualities of STL were found to helpadvance Broadening Participation in STEM as it is theorized in the literature.1. Introduction1Broadening Participation in STEM (BPiS) is a major initiative funded by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) in a range of micro-, meso-, macro-, and exo-level programs that span formaland informal education settings for pre-kindergarten thru secondary, undergraduate, graduate,and postgraduate levels, on to transitioning into the STEM workforce as researchers, scientists,engineers, or other STEM professional careers. According to the NSF, “A diverse and capableworkforce is vital to
industry.Demand for Technicians. The demand for technicians and technologists in the aerospaceindustry in total is not available through the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (USBLS) website(www.bls.gov). The US demand for aircraft and avionics mechanics and technicians is expectedto grow 5%, with an increase in employment of 7,300 from 2019-2029 which does not includethe replacements due to retirement or other attrition [10]. The outlook for Aerospace Engineeringand Operations Technicians is expected to grow 7%, with an increase of 800 technicians between2019-2029 [11]. The outlook for Aerospace Engineers is listed as an increase of 1900 between2019-2029 [12]. These are only a fraction of the technically demanding careers for degreedtechnologists and
motivations to pursue a career in STEMareas in the event context. It focuses specifically on the various roles, such as externalresearchers (invited speakers), academicians (workshop instructors), and collaborating students(workshop assistants) who participate in the event. It aims to understand more profoundly theorganization required to establish strategies that would allow continuity to this powerfulinitiative.Data was collected from interviews with the participants (workshop instructors, workshopassistants, and invited speakers). The results showed that all those involved valued the initiativeand would participate in it again. This type of event is necessary to empower girls andadolescents to choose STEM careers. Opinions ventured by students
/service include 2015 AAAS Mentor Award, Fellow in American Institute of Chemical Engineers Board of Directors, NSF Presidential Award for Ex- cellence in Science, Math and Engineering Mentoring, Council for Chemical Research Diversity Award. She is the founding director of the Promoting Underrepresented Presence on Science and Engineering Faculties (PURPOSE) Institute”. A certified coach, Grant consults and empowers STEM individuals at all levels in the academy towards excellence in career and professional development. Her workshops on mentoring and academic career development for NSF ADVANCE programs at Purdue, Cornell, Texas A&M, University of Toledo, UVA, Prairie View A&M, and the ADVANCE Annual PI meetings
well as their ideal future teaching methods, are characteristic ofessentialism and perennialism, two philosophies that were commonly demonstrated for themduring their undergraduate and graduate careers. Several discrepancies between Inventoryresults and student self-reflections support the need for educational interventions to informgraduate students (i.e. future instructors) about educational philosophies and their implicationsfor teaching and learning.MotivationToday’s graduate students represent the next generation of faculty. This particular generation ofgraduate students has participated in a variety of teaching styles and interventions, from lecture-based classes to problem-based learning and technology-centered instruction. As they
original medium-sized private selective research (or comprehensive) university.The top reasons that students cited were similar at all three institutions. They included:innovation/creativity/design, building things, math/science, practicality/real worldapplications, knowing how things work, and problem solving. The least popular reasonswere also similar for all three institutions: preparation for another career, group work, afamily member in engineering, previous experience in engineering, and engineeringbeing a broad field.Statistically significant differences in responses were found amongst the different typesof institutions. Two of the overall most popular responses, math/science and problemsolving, were significantly more popular at the medium
undergraduate and graduate courses in engineering education for the department. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The Effect of Summer Engineering Camps on Students’ Interest in STEM Based on Their Age (Work-in-Progress)IntroductionSTEM fields play an important role in the United States’ economy and will continue to in thefuture [1]. However, although STEM jobs are being created, the number of students interested inthose careers is not sufficient [2]. Due to the shortage of skilled STEM workforce, there exists anongoing need for better ways to get students to participate and become more involved in STEM.The
students; twentypercent of this population is female. The majority of the students graduating from thisprogram choose Technical Sales as their career. The diverse curriculum of thisengineering major causes students to be well sought out by the industry. However, acareer in Technical Sales is not a traditional choice for women, thus leaving the femaleundergraduates apprehensive about their career goals. So, a group of students and the IDfaculty decided to found an organization that catered to the needs of the female IndustrialDistribution Engineer and resolve this concern. This new organization was namedSociety of Women in Industrial Distribution (SWID).SWID was established with the intention of stimulating and catapulting female
-risk for academic disqualification. Thisprogram was aimed at these at-risk first and second year students.In the Summer of 2015, 26 students were chosen to participate in a one-week science exploratorysummer program in Chemistry, Engineering, and Mathematics. The program involves a threeand a half day exploratory workshop in one of the three disciplines, led by an experiencedfaculty member, and concluded with a half-day career workshop conducted by the UniversityCenter for Career Education and Community Engagement. This workshop program was modeledafter previous work that has been shown to increase interest and retention in science andengineering disciplines for underrepresented minorities [1] [2]. The major focus of the programwas to use
little or no history ofcommitting to a two year sequence of engineering curriculum. Many, in fact, have trouble committing to acomplete calculus sequence or to calculus-based physics. In addition, there is the difficulty of goodarticulation agreements that ensure seamless transfer of two year’s worth of engineering classes betweenTYC’s and universities. A few states, in fact, by law make such transfer impossible.However, the opportunities for increased recruitment of both traditional and under-represented groups tothe educational track leading to an engineering career that are afforded by the community colleges of thisnation may be too large to continue to ignore. The possible increased opportunities for retaining a largerpercentage of beginning
and ways to increase gender-fair practices in preparingteachers, particularly in the areas of mathematics and sciences. A main objective of the projectwas to identify ways to make the fields of math and science more attractive to females or identifythose issues that discourage females from following a career path in math and science so that theycan be avoided. Each university used different methods to address the InGEAR theme. At Georgia Southern University (GSU) yearlong workshops for faculty and academicsupport personnel were developed to address different elements of the project. A study wasconducted to assess gender equity issues related to professions, salary and advancementnationwide and on campus. A library of research articles
Paper ID #43613Exploring Outcome Expectations in Artificial Intelligence and Internet ofThings in First-Year Engineering Students (Work in Progress)Ing. Andrea Ramirez-Salgado, University of Florida Andrea is a doctoral candidate in Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Florida, specializing in Educational Technology. Her work centers on understanding the dynamics of teaching and learning approaches that shape the identity of computer engineers to support computer engineering career choices, particularly in women first-year engineering students. She is committed to designing inclusive curricula that cater to the
, particularly in regards to engineering identity, career goals, expectancy value, and others that emerge.This work is ongoing, and this work in progress paper describes the current data analysis andplans to continue to investigate these questions.MethodsAs part of a larger survey, the EDVES survey [6] was administered electronically and consistedof 38 questions Likert-like question, plus demographic questions. The Likert-like questionresponses were on a 7-point scale, from strongly disagree to strongly agree. A link was sent to allstudent enrolled in FoD three times during the school year: during the first week of fall semester2022, during finals week of fall semester 2022, and during finals week of spring semester 2023.The EDVES survey has
on Long Islandby establishing a Green Building Institute (GBI). The primary function of the GBI at FSCis to assist educators to create and implement new curricula and learning experiencesdesigned to educate and produce a workforce that will be available for employment ingreen industries, construction trades, and related enterprises1. The educators who willcollaborate in this project are university faculty from FSC, Educational OpportunityCenter instructors, adult and secondary technical instructors from ESB, and High Schoolinstructors through LI Works Green Career Academies. As a public college of appliedscience and technology founded in 1912, FSC enrolls 6,800 undergraduate students inSchools of Engineering Technology, Health Sciences, Arts
of women in the technical professions of anengineering university has a number of advantages while presenting many problems. Among themany problems are the following: (1) a lack of career advancement for women in engineeringeducation; (2) a shortage of women in administrative positions with influence in the decisionmaking process; (3) the resurgence of chauvinistic stereotypes for women; and (4) the conflictbetween family and professional life.This paper explores the impact of gender bias in the Russian academic community and assessesthe obstacles for technically trained women in the male dominated Russian university.IntroductionSince 1917 and until the end of the Soviet era, the role of women was very important in theengineering and
106 138 77% 2023 71 105 68% 2024 79 121 65%Inductive coding was used to analyze the questions students asked, and common questions andthemes were noted.FindingsFive categories of responses emerged from the coding. These categories are: • Questions about professor’s past industry experiences • Questions about professor’s current teaching career • Questions about professor’s general career and life pathway • Questions about the specific course and its operation • Questions about hobbies and personal interestsSome questions did not fit into any of these categories, and did not
a quarter of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) jobs. Inthe last twenty years, many educators and researchers have worked to develop strategies andprograms to increase the participation of women in STEM careers. Research shows that strategicintervention at the middle school-level can have great impacts on female students’ perspectivesof careers in STEM fields. At Rowan University, the Society of Women Engineers: Engineers inTraining (SWEET) Program, a program led by engineering faculty and the students of theuniversity’s chapter of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE), was established to help redefinethe role of women in STEM fields. Through a series of workshops, the SWEET Programexposed middle school-aged girls to