Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 1261 - 1290 of 12597 in total
Conference Session
A Global Engineer: International and Domestic Engineer
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Isaac W. Wait, Marshall University; Andrew P. Nichols, Marshall University; Wael A. Zatar, Marshall University
Tagged Divisions
International
AC 2011-301: COMPARISON OF PREFERRED LEARNING STYLES FORINTERNATIONAL AND DOMESTIC UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERINGSTUDENTSIsaac W. Wait, Marshall University Isaac W. Wait is an assistant professor of engineering in the College of Information Technology and Engineering at Marshall University in Huntington, West Virginia. Dr. Wait teaches and conducts research in the areas of water resources and environmental engineering. Dr. Wait joined Marshall in 2009 after teaching for four years at the American University of Sharjah, in the United Arab Emirates.Andrew P Nichols, Marshall UniversityWael A. Zatar, Marshall University
Conference Session
Fundamental: K-12 Students' Beliefs, Motivation, and Self-efficacy
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cole Hatfield Joslyn, Purdue University, West Lafayette; James Holly Jr., INSPIRE Institute, Purdue University; Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
in mathematics education and has worked as an engineer, a pastor, and a high school math teacher.Mr. James Holly Jr., INSPIRE Institute, Purdue University James Holly Jr. is a Ph.D. Student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received a B.S. from Tuskegee University and a M.S. from Michigan State University, both in Mechanical Engineering. His research interest is exploring formal and informal K-12 engineering education learning contexts. Specif- ically, he is interested in how the engineering design process can be used to emphasize the humanistic side of engineering and investigating how engineering habits of mind can enhance pre-college students’ learning abilities.Dr. Morgan M Hynes, Purdue
Conference Session
NSF Grantees: S-STEM 4
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kim Bullington, Old Dominion University; Cynthia Tomovic, Old Dominion University; Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; Anthony W. Dean, Old Dominion University; Rafael Landaeta, Old Dominion University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
and the tools provided within it, participantsare able to create a portfolio of knowledge to help ensure their career readiness as they prepare tograduate and enter the engineering workforce. The program aims to cover six objectives:development of camaraderie, career awareness, engineering identity, professionalism, financialsecurity, and engineering self-efficacy [6].CamaraderieCamaraderie, defined as “friendship and encouragement to other like-minded military veteranstudents” [6] is a major objective of this project. Camaraderie has played a leading role in thesuccess of the program. The weekly seminars provide a platform where students come togetherand share their personal and academic challenges and successes; it provides student veterans
Conference Session
New Approaches and Applications to Enhance Technological Literacy - Part I
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alicia L Lyman-Holt, Oregon State University; Laia Cari Robichaux, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
. The mini-wave flume has been speciallydesigned to facilitate engineering literacy. Engineering literacy is defined as a “person [who] isable to understand the relationships between parts and the whole, uses models for representingconcepts, and applies knowledge to solve problems in our [lives]” viii. Knowing about engineersand engineer training, and engineer “habits of mind” ix could aid citizens in public policydiscourse and decision making by consumers x. However, despite efforts in engineeringeducation, the majority of Americans have little to no understanding of what engineers do andwhy it is important to our society xi. The mini-flume activity allows participants to experiencehow civil engineers involved in coastal engineering work
Conference Session
Notable Topics in Civil Engineering Education
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Greg Rulifson P.E., University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
engineering”, including 20 attitudes (Table 1): “commitment, confidence, considerationof others, curiosity, entrepreneurship, fairness, high expectations, honesty, integrity, intuition,judgment, optimism, persistence, positiveness, respect, self-esteem, sensitivity, thoughtfulness,thoroughness, and tolerance.”2, p. 148 Interestingly, the attitude entrepreneurship is omitted fromthe list in Appendix O of the BOK2, p. 172; this is perhaps indicative of the difficulty in convergingon a single set of appropriate or desirable attitudes. Some of these attitudes are reflective of a“People Mind” as described by Goldberg and Somerville12, such as consideration of others.Despite the seeming certainty of the list of important attitudes that were articulated for
Conference Session
Curricula of the Past, Present, and Future
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cristina Pomales-Garcia, University of Michigan; Yili Liu, University of Michigan; Virginia Soto, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
) educational technology, (3) the student’s rolein the engineering college, and (4) the professor’s role in the engineering college. Theparticipants were instructed to write 10 words or phrases that come to their mind when they thinkabout each of the questions and rank their answers in the order of importance. Following theindividual questions, ten questions were discussed in a focus group. The results of the studyshowed that when it comes to evaluation of education and teaching methods, students would liketo see more opportunities to give input in the system and be more involved as part of the creationin all levels and steps. Current literature on Excellence in Engineering Education stresses theimportance of skills and knowledge but leaves out two
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics II
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christopher Papadopoulos; Andrew Hable, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
(e.g., the purchase of paint)defense-related goods and services. However, these estimates do not include defense-related purchases by agencies other that DOD, such as DOE or NASA; whether or not thedata reflects effort related to defense sales to foreign governments is unclear. Furthermuddying the data is the fact that some of the engineering effort reflected in the DODdata is provided by engineers in foreign countries under contract with US companies.With these caveats in mind, our complied data indicates that about 8.8% of professionalengineering effort is devoted to defense-related activities – about 3 times higher than forthe overall workforce defense effort (2.8%). Some specializations, such as aerospaceengineering and electrical
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics V
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tammy VanDeGrift, University of Portland; Donald Chinn, University of Washington, Tacoma
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
AC 2009-2512: AN EXERCISE TO ENGAGE COMPUTING STUDENTS INDISCUSSIONS OF PROFESSIONAL ISSUESTammy VanDeGrift, University of Portland Dr. Tammy VanDeGrift is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Portland. Her research interests include computer science education and computer science theory. In the arena of computer science education research, she is especially interested in conducting studies that investigate students' preconceptions of computing ideas.Donald Chinn, University of Washington, Tacoma Dr. Donald Chinn is an Associate Professor at the University of Washington, Tacoma. He helped create a supplementary problem solving workshop program
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Courses
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Samuel Aaron Snyder, Virginia Tech; Desen Sevi Özkan, Virginia Tech; Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Tech; Thomas W. Staley, Virginia Tech; Stephen Biscotte, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
FacultyInterdisciplinary Identities in Self-Managed Teams,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol.100, no. 2, pp. 374–396, 2011.[20] J. G. Donald, Learning To Think: Disciplinary Perspectives. The Jossey-Bass Higher andAdult Education Series. ERIC, 2002.[21] J. S. Stark and L. R. Lattuca, Shaping the College Curriculum: Academic Plans in Action,John Wiley & Sons, 2011.[22] C. E. Coburn, L. Choi, and Mata, “‘I would go to her because her mind is math’ - NetworkFormation in the Context of a District-Based Math Reform,” in Social Network Theory andEducational Change, A. J. Daly and J. W. Little, Eds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard EducationPress, 2010.[23] V. A. Durrington, J. Repman, and T. W. Valente, “Using Social Network Analysis ToExamine the Time of Adoption of
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Experiences
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Harold T. Evensen, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Molly M. Gribb P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Adel Nasiri, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
Paper ID #26619Internet of Things Curriculum Workshop: An Interdisciplinary, Cross-InstitutionalEffort for Education in an Expanding FieldDr. Harold T. Evensen, University of Wisconsin, Platteville Hal Evensen earned his doctorate in Engineering Physics from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where he performed research in the area of plasma nuclear fusion. Before joining UW-Platteville in 1999, he was a post-doctoral researcher at the University of Washington, part of group that developed automation for biotechnology. His recent research includes carbon nanotube electronics.Dr. Molly M. Gribb P.E., University of Wisconsin
Conference Session
NGSS & Engineering Education
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica Cellitti, Drexel University ; Rasheda Likely, Drexel University; Magdalene Kate Moy, Drexel University; Christopher George Wright, Drexel University
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
“effective method of inquiry” [2]. With this in mind, science education is moving toward givingstudents an experiential learning opportunity rather than just relying on memorization fromtextbooks. Although theoretically beneficial, the NGSS represent a conceptual shift from scienceinstruction to interdisciplinary knowledge, particularly that of engineering. The NationalResearch Council [3] reports that, “[f]or science teachers to embrace their role as teachers ofscience communication and of practices of acquiring, evaluating, and integrating informationfrom multiple sources and multiple forms of presentation, their preparation as teachers will needto be strong in these areas” [4]. Unfortunately, these standards did not provide
Conference Session
Engineering Career Attitudes
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University; Oluwatosin A. Bewaji, Texas A&M University; Madison Elaine Spier, Texas A&M University; Gustavo Mosqueda Elizondo III, Texas A&M University; Chiamaka Theclar Umah; Todd Sherron, Texas State University; J. Timothy Lightfoot, Texas A&M University; Carolyn L. Cannon, Texas A&M University; Robin S.L. Fuchs-Young, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
Paper ID #23942Promoting the STEM Pipeline and Enhancing STEM Career Awareness ThroughParticipation in Authentic Research Activities (RTP, Diversity)Dr. Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Bugrahan Yalvac is an associate professor of science and engineering education in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received his Ph.D. in science education at the Pennsylvania State University in 2005. Prior to his current position, he worked as a learning scientist for the VaNTH Engineering Research Center at Northwestern University for three years. Yalvac’s
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Programs
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gang Zheng, University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute; Horst Hohberger, University of Michigan - Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute; Chengbin Ma, University of Michigan–Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute; Pradeep Ray, University of Michigan Joint Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
again as different majors to form multidisciplinaryteams and work on industry-sponsored projects; the Global Multidisciplinary Design Project(GMDP) extends the boundaries of capstone design projects to involve internationalcollaborations; liberal arts courses broaden students’ horizon beyond engineering fields and helpstudents to think about engineering problems from different perspectives. The JI offers minors innon-engineering fields including entrepreneurship, data science, and computer science, toprovide concentrated studies in the non-engineering fields. Through the engineering curricula,our goal is to train effective engineers with interdisciplinary experience, technical knowledge,innovative minds, a deep understanding of professional
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Experiences
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Alexandra Hain, University of Connecticut; Sarira Motaref P.E., University of Connecticut
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
improve student learning.IntroductionIt is critical for engineers to recognize the actual shape of elements from 2D drawings, identifypotential applied loadings scenarios on structural elements, and predict the expected deformationand possible failure mechanisms. The ability to visualize and manipulate objects in one’s mind isa vital skill in engineering [1]. Previous studies have shown that accurately visualizing objects in3D improves spatial understanding [2], which has been associated with success in engineeringprograms. However, students often tend to struggle with 3D visualization due to a lack oftraining [3]. One option for improving visualization and spatial skills is providing opportunitiesfor students to interact with handheld models
Conference Session
Engineering Identity 1
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katherine E Winters, Virginia Tech; Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington, Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT); Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Paper ID #7111From Freshman Engineering Students to Practicing Professionals: Changesin Beliefs about Important Skills over TimeDr. Katherine E Winters, Virginia Tech Katherine Winters earned her PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech studying the career goals and actions of early career engineering graduates. She also has BS and MS degrees in Civil Engineering from BYU.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia TechMs. Samantha Brunhaver, Stanford University Samantha Brunhaver is a fifth year graduate student at Stanford University. She is currently working on her PhD in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in
Conference Session
Engineering Education Research
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Jolly Lesley; David Radcliffe
Session 1630` Dilemmas in Framing Research Studies in Engineering Education David F Radcliffe, Lesley Jolly Catalyst Centre, School of Engineering, University of Queensland, AustraliaAbstractThere has been considerable debate about the need for more empirical, evidence based studies ofthe impact of various interventions and practices in engineering education. A number ofresources including workshops to guide engineering faculty in the conduct of such studies haveemerged over recent years. This paper presents a critique of the evolution of engineeringeducation research and its underlying assumptions in
Conference Session
Understanding Engineering Design
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Gul Okudan Kremer; Madara Ogot
, Learning, Personality, Social, 14, 179-199.45. Kruglanski, A. W. and Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “seizing” and “freezing.” Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.46. McLain, D. L. (1993). The MSTAT-I: A new measure of an individual’s tolerance for ambiguity.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 183-189.Gül E. OKUDAN is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Design and an Affiliate Faculty of IndustrialEngineering at Penn State. She has a doctorate in Engineering Management (UM-Rolla). Her research interestsinclude manufacturing strategy modeling and measurement, design cognition, solid modeling and productdesign teams. She is a member of ASEE and ASME.Susan MOHAMMED is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Penn
Conference Session
Engineering Education Research
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Barbara Williams; Paul Blowers
the quality of an education; nevertheless, Page 8.109.11many college ranking systems purport to do just that, often to the dismay of college admissions Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationofficers. As much as critics of ranking systems complain about their unfairness and unreliability,practically everyone uses them for different purposes in one form or another and they are here tostay. With those sentiments in mind we would like to make the case for a more inclusive processin these ranking
Conference Session
Engineering Education Research
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Robin Adams; Reed Stevens; Lorraine Fleming; Cynthia Atman; Sheri Sheppard; Theresa Barker; Ruth Streveler
Center.9. Light, R.J. (2001). Making the Most of College: Students Speak Their Minds. Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press.10. Astin, A.W. (1997). Student Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education. In E.J. Whitt (Ed.)College Student Affairs Administration. Massachusetts: Simon & Schuster.11. Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N.M. (1997). Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.12. Felder, R. (1995). A Longitudinal Study of Nontraditional Instruction in Engineering Education. ASEE AnnualConference Proceedings, 2,2291-2294.13. Felder, R., Felder, G., and Dietz, E.J. (1997). A Longitudinal Study of Alternative Approaches to EngineeringEducation: Survey of Assessment Results. Proceedings
Conference Session
International Engineering Education
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Bahadur Khan Khpolwak; Mohammad Saleh Keshawarz
Session 2160 An Attempt to Resurrect Engineering Education in Herat, Afghanistan M. Saleh Keshawarz, Bahadur Khan Khpolwak Associate Professor and Chairman of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA/Dean, Faculty of Engineering, Herat University, Herat, AfghanistanAbstractFormal Engineering Education goes back to 1956 when engineering courses were offered as partof the Faculty of Science. However, it was not until 1996, when Engineering College started itsoperation as an independent college. The new college was built through the
Conference Session
Engineering Engagement Activities
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yury Alexandrovich Kuleshov, Purdue University; Anne M Lucietto, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology Division (ETD)
Paper ID #44264Designing a Series of Activities to Expose High School Students to ManufacturingMr. Yury Alexandrovich Kuleshov, Purdue University Yury A. Kuleshov is a graduate student earning his Ph.D. in Technology degree from Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. He received his Diploma in Engineering (6-year program) from Bauman Moscow State Technical University, where he majored in Robots and Robotic Systems, and specifically Underwater Robots and Vehicles, and his M.S. in Engineering Technology degree from Purdue University. He has experience working as an engineer, a research and teaching assistant, and an
Conference Session
Engineering Mathematical Potpourri
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jean Hodges, Virginia Commonwealth University, Qatar
Tagged Divisions
Mathematics
inspired the focus of her research and academic work: how we learnthe psychology of writing and creating. She has presented on this topic in professional meetings and academic venues. From 2005-2010 she collaborated with Dr. John Schmeelk on a five-year series of studies that revolutionized the teach- ing of Contemporary Mathematics at VCUQatar. Results from these studies have been presented in Abu Dhabi and Qatar, as well as at previous annual meetings of ASEE. Page 22.86.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF USING WRITING AS A CRITICAL
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Topics
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joe Gregory, The University of Arizona; Rick Steiner, The University of Arizona
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering Division (SYS)
Paper ID #42593Leveraging Active Learning Techniques to Teach Model-Based Systems EngineeringDr. Joe Gregory, The University of Arizona Dr. Joe Gregory is a postdoctoral research associate at the University of Arizona. His research interests include engineering education, digital engineering, model-based systems engineering, and the application of semantic web technologies to support engineering. In 2022, he received his PhD in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Bristol for his development of the SysML-based ’Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’. He is the co-chair of the Digital Engineering Information Exchange (DEIX
Collection
2001 Annual Conference
Authors
Leslie Crowley; Ray Price; Jonathan R. Dolle; Bruce Litchfield
emotion and intelligence, areopen to various interpretations.2 EEI attempts rather to distill from a broader constellation onecrucial and overlooked concept in engineering and technology curricula. And that is thatemotions are real and important, and as significant an indicator of success as intellectual andacademic ability.3 By beginning with this main concept, we can help our students to movetowards developing the self-awareness necessary for acquiring and honing other criticalcompetencies.II. BRIEF BACKGROUND OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCEDaniel Goleman, psychologist, journalist in behavioral and brain sciences, and author ofEmotional Intelligence and Working With Emotional Intelligence, writes: “In a sense we have two brains, two minds
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Programs
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Edward F. Crawley, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Anette Hosoi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Gregory L. Long Ph.D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Timothy Kassis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; William Dickson, General Motors; Amitava 'Babi' Mitra, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
cogently present to senior managers and team members --- was adifferentiating skill even for entry-level engineers.Feedback was sought from sophomores in the first cohort both through anonymous online surveys andthrough face-to-face discussions. They responded that what they liked most about NEET was that theywere becoming part of a professional community; this feedback though welcome, was somewhatunexpected as NEET had not been designed with that goal in mind. Sophomores appreciated the project-centric approach and the interactions NEET was starting to develop with industry.Though it is far too early to come to meaningful conclusions for the medium to longer term, the initialresponse is encouraging. Over 5% of the Class of 2020 engineering
Conference Session
Aerospace Engineering Curriculum
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Keith Koenig; Masoud Rais-Rohani; Thomas Hannigan
Session 3202 Keeping Students Engaged: An Overview of Three Introductory Courses in Aerospace Engineering M. Rais-Rohani, K. Koenig, T. Hannigan Mississippi State UniversityAbstractThe traditional approach of teaching major-specific courses beginning in the first or secondsemester sophomore year has many drawbacks that could lead to stifling student's enthusiasmand interest in his/her field of study and very often to the loss of many talented students to otherprograms. To alleviate this problem and to keep students engaged and interested in their
Conference Session
Unique Student Opportunities in BME
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeffrey Johnson, University of Cincinnati / Engineering; Eileen Crisanti, University of Cincinnati; Jill Collet, University of Cincinnati; Edward Grood; Linda Moeller, University of Cincinnati
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
AC 2008-2265: UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH CO-OP IN BIOMEDICALENGINEERINGJeffrey Johnson, University of Cincinnati / EngineeringEileen Crisanti, University of CincinnatiJill Collet, University of CincinnatiEdward Grood,Linda Moeller, University of Cincinnati Page 13.1307.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Under gr aduate Resear ch Co-op in Biomedical Engineer ingAbstr actWe present our model for expanding a mandatory cooperative education program to includeresearch co-op. Yg"nkokv"vjg"fghkpkvkqp"qh"c"Ðtgugctej"eq-qrÑ"vq"cp"gzrgtkgpvkcn"ngctpkpi"opportunity in academic research laboratory. While we recognize that research experiences canoccur in industry, we
Conference Session
Capstone Design Courses II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hsiao-Wen Wang, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Paper ID #15919Inspiring Future Hydraulic Engineers with Problem-Based LearningProf. Hsiao-Wen Wang, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Inspiring Future Hydraulic Engineers with Problem-Based LearningI. Abstract In Taiwan, the importance of the hydraulic engineering field is growing, particularly in terms of recent water supply sustainability issues and the ongoing prevalence of weather-related events and challenges, such as droughts and floods. In order to inspire 21st century students who will serve as professionals in the hydraulic engineering field, problem solving
Conference Session
Technological Literacy and the Non-science College Student
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mariana Tafur, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Demetra Evangelou, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering learning, the measurement and support of change of ”habits of mind,” particularly in regards to sustainability and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully provide access to and support learning of complexity. Page 25.1379.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Troubleshooting Skills for Non-Engineers In Technological JobsAbstractAlthough there is an
Conference Session
Track 1 - Session 1
Collection
2014 ASEE International Forum
Authors
Andras Gordon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Richard J Schuhmann, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Richard F. Devon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Andrew Michael Erdman, The Pennsylvania State University; Ahmad Atieh, Taibah Univeristy; Peter Dietrich, Corvinus University Budapest
Tagged Topics
Curriculum and Lab Development
Paper ID #10995Cultural Accommodation in Virtual Engineering Academic TeamsMr. Andras Gordon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Andras Gordon is an Instructor of Engineering Design in the School of Engineering Design, Technology and Professional Programs, College of Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University.Dr. Richard J Schuhmann, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDr. Richard F. Devon, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkMr. Andrew Michael Erdman, The Pennsylvania State UniversityDr. Ahmad Atieh, Taibah Univeristy Ahmad Atieh had received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of Ottawa