much a part of what motivates many of our first-year students. By the time the professor sees the same students again in the 3rd year, there is acompletely different look on their faces, a look of being crushed by the weight of the “realities”that we teach so thoroughly in our curricula.What happened to the grand dreams? This paper takes the position that the dreamer still has aplace in aerospace engineering, and lays out examples of projects and course ideas/experiencesto tap the potential tied up in those brains. It is very much part of the mission of a university toconvey this inspiration to dream, the environment to do so, including the scientific, moral and
that synchronous courses beoffered at particular times (partner requests). Efforts were made to create long-term (2 to 3 year)schedules which provided the DL student with information about course future offerings.Furthermore, as DL programs became more popular at the university, access to a limited numberof DL classrooms (university controlled) became competitive. The department, and oureducational partners developed asynchronous classes which alleviated the time requirement, andallowed students who were on extended deployments to remain in the program. Furthermore, weused well-qualified adjunct faculty to teach courses pertinent to the degree. Many of thesefaculty were Ph.D.’s or MD’s employed by our partner, which allowed some of the courses
implement computer design in hardware 1.However, this project is unique for several reasons. First, students are given creativity to designtheir own instruction sets rather than use a preexisting one. Second, unlike similar projects atother universities, the project requires no specialized hardware or software. Third, the projectdoes not require students to know any particular background knowledge before the course apartfrom basic programming, a typical prerequisite for computer organization courses. Fourth, byrequiring students to simulate and evaluate their processors, the project teaches how realprocessor research and evaluation are performed.In Section 2 of this paper, we describe the student populations for which this project was
AC 2008-2922: THE ROLE OF DIAGNOSTIC REASONING IN ENGINEERINGDESIGN: CASE STUDIESDavid Crismond, The City College of New York Dr. David Crismond is an Associate Professor of Science Education at the City College of New York. He received his masters degree in 1992 from MIT’s mechanical engineering department, and earned his doctorate in Human Development and Psychology from the Harvard Graduate School of Education in 1997. His career in education has included public school teaching, developing engineering design-related interactive multimedia materials at MIT, and design-oriented science curricula at TERC and Georgia Tech. He has been Principal Investigator for the NSF-funded
ApproachThe approach used for assessment is adapted from our physics program. The purpose ofassessment is to determine what the students have actually learned, not what they know. Thisinformation is not used to assign grades to the students (although the post test is also used as asummative assessment tool, i.e. a quiz). Instead, this information is used to evaluate studentlearning and professor teaching. It is used to change both what we teach and how we teach it.In our lower division physics courses, these data are obtained by administering pre-tests and posttests to our students. At the beginning of each term, students are given a major pre-test looking atconcepts (not math skills) taught during that term. At the end of the term, they receive the
, he was at the Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand. Dr. Nagarur had been a visiting professor at Kansas State University, University of Technology at Eindhoven, the Netherlands, Thammasat University, Bangkok, and Bangkok University. Dr. Nagarur’s areas of research interest are operations management of supply chains, option pricing and risk assessment of financial systems, and clustering techniques for cell formations. His teaching interests include supply chains, stochastic processes, and financial engineering.Krishnaswami Srihari, State University of New York, Binghamton Distinguished Professor Srihari is currently the Chairman of the Department of Systems Science and
; Ehrmann, 1996; Kearns, Shoaf, & Summey, 2004; Smith, 2006)Others have studied issues associated with online courses including the problems with collectingonline assignments (Goldman, Cohen, & Sheahan, 2008; Jaffe, 1997), giving particular types ofassignments (Arbaugh, & Rau, 2007; Nichols, Shaffer, & Shockey, 2003; Lewis, & Abdul-Hamid, 2006)., and the composition of online student populations. (Buckley, 2003; Mentzer,Cryan,& Teclehaimanot, 2007) In future endeavors this body of knowledge could impact studentcourse satisfaction or dissatisfaction on student evaluation of teaching surveys.The purpose of this study is to examine due dates of online assignments in relationship to studentneeds. This study will benefit both
students to pursue both knowledge and wisdom, and to aspire to ethical and moral leadership within their chosen careers, their community, and the world. We value a spirit of community among all members of the college that respects academic freedom and inquiry, the discovery and cultivation of new knowledge, and continued innovation in all that we do.The mission statement of the University is reflected in these mission statements. In addition,these mission statements guided the development of our objectives, which are presented later inthis paper.FacultyA full-time teaching load in the College of Engineering at Villanova is 12 contact hours persemester. If a faculty member is an active scholar, this load is reduced to 9
Session 0475 Guidelines for Writing Proposals for Grants and Funds John H. Damell Western Kentucky UniversityAbstract With the financial constraints under which most universities are working today, educators must dependupon outside revenue to provide equipment and other resources for effective teaching. Educators must raise theirown funds to meet their needs for research and teaching, so they are compelled to write proposals for grants.Grants and other funding are increasingly becoming difficult to obtain. To be
Session 0475 Guidelines for Writing Proposals for Grants and Funds John H. Damell Western Kentucky UniversityAbstract With the financial constraints under which most universities are working today, educators must dependupon outside revenue to provide equipment and other resources for effective teaching. Educators must raise theirown funds to meet their needs for research and teaching, so they are compelled to write proposals for grants.Grants and other funding are increasingly becoming difficult to obtain. To be
improvement inteaching effectiveness or student learning. The MET Department’s contribution to this effortinvolved a project that focused on a restructuring of the credit hour count in the existing plan ofstudy with an emphasis on overall reduction of hours required. Outcomes for this project havebeen summarized in another paper by Hutzel, et.al [5]. A second project involves planning andimplementation of a more comprehensive recruitment/enrollment development plan. Thetechnical staff is working on a third project aimed at standardizing and documenting laboratoryprocedures to allow smoother transitions when laboratory courses are taught by different facultyor with different technical support personnel.In general, the university community has
Ph.D. from SIUC in 1991 and 2002 respectively. He teaches courses in electric power and machinery, industrial automation, and electric circuits. His research interests include power systems economics, power markets, and electric energy management. Page 14.534.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Energy Management and Renewable Power Design Projects from a University Power GridAbstractProject-based learning is a recognized method for engaging students. Projects involvingindustrial power systems give students exposure to current methods and practices relevant
AC 2009-186: INDUSTRIAL INTERNSHIPS: THE FINAL PART OF ATHREE-PHASE MULTISUBJECT EXPERIMENT IN PROJECT-BASEDLEARNING IN VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY STUDIESEmilia Bratschitsch, Joanneum University of Applied Sciences Emilia Bratschitsch is head of the Department of Vehicle Technologies (Automotive and Railway Engineering) and teaches Electrics, Electronics and Methods of Signal Processing at the University of Applied Sciences Joanneum in Graz (Austria). She is also a visiting lecturer at the Faculty of Transport of the Technical University of Sofia (Bulgaria). She graduated with a degree in Medical Electronics as well in Technical Journalism from the Technical University of Sofia and received her PhD
Hill, Peoria, IL. pp. 131-145.[12] Ssemakula, M. E., “A Hands-on Approach to Teaching Manufacturing Processes,” Proceedings of the 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Oct. 10-13, 2001, Reno, NV.[13] Fang, N., and Stewardson, G. A., “Improving Engineering Laboratory Experience Through Computer Simulation and Cooperative Learning,” 2007, Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 24-27, 2007, Honolulu, HI.[14] Dutson, A., Green, M., Wood, K., and Jensen, D., “Active Learning Approaches in Engineering Design Courses,” 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 22-25, 2003, Nashville, TN.[15] Gehringer, E., “Active and
PreventionAbstract Student projects have examined how to apply pollution prevention strategies to bothR&D and manufacturing in several chemical industries. This has been accomplished throughindustry-university partnerships with pharmaceutical and petrochemical companies. Severalgrants from the US Environmental Protection Agency have supported initiatives in greenchemistry, engineering and design. These projects have the broader goal of supportingsustainability in the chemical industry.Introduction Too often the teaching of a technical subject like green engineering is limited to anindividual class experience or one dimensional laboratory or design experience. The teaching ofpollution prevention in the curriculum is greatly enhanced by
technology students closer in terms of learning both aspects of this importanttechnique.In this paper, an assessment of learning is reported where these classes of load flow tools areused in laboratories for engineering instruction and for engineering technology instruction.Methodologies are presented for teaching load flow from both perspectives: from a basicprogramming perspective and from a holistic perspective using a high level software simulationpackage. The results are assessed and recommendations for improvement are presented.Programming perspectiveA five-bus electric power system presents a significant programming problem without becomeexcessively burdensome. In the work at hand, the power system diagrammed in Figure 1 waspresented to
Paper ID #17703Evaluating Freshman Engineering Design Projects Using Adaptive Compar-ative JudgmentDr. Greg J. Strimel, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Greg J. Strimel is an assistant professor of engineering/technology teacher education in the Purdue Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. His prior teaching experience includes serving as a high school engineering/technology teacher and a teaching assistant professor within the College of Engineering & Mineral Resources at West Virginia University.Dr. Scott R. Bartholomew, Purdue University My interests revolve around adaptive
Paper ID #17887Evaluation of Undergraduate Summer Research Internships in Various Ad-vanced Manufacturing ProjectsMrs. Perihan Fidan, Tennessee Technological University Perihan is a Ph.D. candidate in the Exceptional Learning Program of Tennessee Technological University. Her current research interests include STEM education and incorporating literacy into STEM classrooms. She is a graduate teaching assistant for Science Methods, Science for the Elementary Teachers, Learning Theories, and Field Experience in Education courses. She also serves as a president of the One World Student Club and a treasurer for the Ph.D. Honor
Paper ID #18907Impact of New FE Test AvailabilityDr. Jason Andrew Roney, University of Denver Dr. Roney is currently a Teaching Assistant Professor of Mechanical and Materials Engineering. Dr. Roney joined the University of Denver (DU) in Autumn 2014. Prior to joining DU, Dr. Roney held both industry and academic positions. One of his areas of research interest is Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education.Dr. Breigh Nonte Roszelle, University of Denver Dr. Breigh Roszelle completed her undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering at Colorado State University in 2006. She then continued in academia
, MATH 1348 Analytical Geometry,Year-2 PHYS 2425/2426 Physics I/II, CHEM 1311 Inorganic Chemistry I MATH 1316 Trigonometry, MATH 1348 Analytical Geometry, MATH 3320Year-3 Differential Equations, PHYS 2425 Physics I, CHEM 1311 Inorganic Chemistry I Identify Concept(s) to be Develop Draft Module Identify Bottleneck Covered Each Week including Sample Problems/ Concepts According to Teaching Examples and Solutions (Course Instructor) Schedule
Research, vol. 74, pp. 59-109[12] J. W. Thomas (2000). A review of research on project-based learning, accessed on Jan. 29.2019, www.bie.org/index.php/site/RE/pbl_research/29[13] B. D. Jones, “Motivating students to engage in learning: The MUSIC model of academicmotivation,” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 21 (2),272-285, accessed on Jan. 29, 2019, http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ899315.pdf[14] R. J. Marzano, D. J. Pickering and T. Heflebowen, The highly engaged classroom, MarzanoResearch Laboratory, 2011[15] A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency,” American Psychologist, vol. 37(2), pp. 122–147, 1982, doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122[16] A. Carroll and S. Houghton, “Self-efficacy and
fundamental engineering knowledge to model and design complexengineering systems. These findings have had a major impact on the revision of nationalaccreditation criteria for engineering programs [3]. The engineering education paradigm hasshifted to not being “what is taught” to “what is being learnt”through program educationalobjectives and student learning outcomes [4]. These developments in industry needs andaccreditation criteria have necessitated the need of changing the focus of delivery of engineeringeducation to more hands-on student-centered teaching and learning methodologies in contrastwith mostly static and one-way lecture-based teaching.Engineering Design and Project Based LearningThe primary goal of engineering curriculum is to prepare
and systems for sensing, electromagnetic systems, feedback and controls, renewable energy, automotive, biomedical, and consumer applications. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Charge Up! A Wireless Power Transfer Activity for High School Students Akshay Sarin† , Sung Yul Chu† , Heath Hofmann, Al-Thaddeus AvestruzAbstractCharge Up! is an engaging activity for inspiring young high school students to pursue careers inelectrical engineering. The activity is designed to teach fundamental principles of wireless powertransfer (WPT) to high school students. The students get exposed to the iterative engineeringdesign process by building an
have become very popular in USA and Canada. They exposestudents to real engineering environments in different countries far from their homeland where differentcultures have survived over centuries and millennia. International internships teach engineering internshow products are envisioned and used differently in different cultures. Conversely, internationalinternships expose students to how different tools are used for the same purpose in different countries,like an American kitchen knife and an Asian Bothi. Giving another example, again from Japan, in the areaof New Production System (NPS), Noboru Kawasaki writes, “A company that has even a shred of doubt inNPS will not succeed. NPS is like a Lotus Sutra, a Buddhist mantra that teaches
Paper ID #24273Effect of Entrepreneurial Mindset on Funding Opportunities forFundamental ResearchSamarth Gupta, Purdue UniversityDr. Greg J. Strimel, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Greg J. Strimel is an assistant professor of engineering/technology teacher education in the Purdue Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. His prior teaching experience includes serving as a high school engineering/technology teacher and a teaching assistant professor within the College of Engineering & Mineral Resources at West Virginia University. ©American Society for Engineering
students discover opportunities and solve problems with design. She is the co-instructor of the Clinical Immersion program in the Department of BioEngineering. Susan balances teaching with her professional career as a design researcher, consultant and strategist.Dr. Miiri Kotche, University of Illinois, Chicago Miiri Kotche is a Clinical Associate Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and currently serves as Director of the Medical Accelerator for Devices Laboratory (MAD Lab) at the UIC Innovation Center. Prior to joining the faculty at UIC, she worked in new product development for medical devices, telecommunications and consumer products. She co-teaches both bioengineering
Paper ID #22143Robotics in Electronics Engineering TechnologyDr. Asad Yousuf, Savannah State University Asad Yousuf is the Coordinator and Professor of Electronics Engineering Technology at Savannah State UniversityDr. Mohamad A. Mustafa, Savannah State University Mohamad Mustafa is a Professor of Civil Engineering Technology and the Chair of the Engineering Technology Department at Savannah State University (SSU). He has six years of industrial experience prior to teaching at SSU. He received his BS, MS, and PhD in Civil Engineering from Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.Mr. Alberto G. De La CruzAlfredo
Laboratory for Functional and Molecular Imaging, working in the development of high-contrast anatomical MRI techniques. In May 2006, she joined the Neuroimmunology Branch of NINDS, where she worked on brain imaging, using MRI and PET, in pa- tients with Multiple Sclerosis. Since August 2009, she has been with George Mason University, where she is an Assistant Professor of Bioengineering. Her research interests are in the fields of video analytics for stress detection, MRI image processing, and differentiated learning techniques for engineering education. Dr Ikonomidou has co-authored 22 papers in peer-reviewed journals, and is a member of IEEE.Prof. Anastasia P Samaras, George Mason University, VA USA ANASTASIA P. SAMARAS
Paper ID #14997Applying ”The New Age of Innovations Principles” to Software EngineeringEducationDr. Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Guruji Education Foudation Dr Pradeep Waychal is a founder trustee and the chair of Guruji Education Foundation that provides holistic support to the education of underprivileged students and operates on funding from friends. The foundation has recently extended its work in diverse areas such research in engineering education, youth employability and teaching computer science to adolescents. Earlier, Dr Waychal has worked at Patni Computer Systems for 20 years in various positions including the head
to describe the field. The manufacturing engineering education providesproduction related knowledge such as customer focus, quality and continuous improvement,manufacturing processes, product design, process design, laboratories, and many others. Fourpillars are: (i) Materials and manufacturing processes: understanding the behavior and propertiesof materials as they are altered and influenced by processing in manufacturing; (ii) Product,tooling, and assembly engineering: understanding the design of products and the equipment,tooling, and environment necessary for their manufacture; (iii) Manufacturing systems andoperations: understanding the creation of competitive advantage through manufacturingplanning, strategy, and control; (iv