and career. Hands-on group projects formed the bulk of the curricula, providinga semi-authentic feel of engineering work and an atmosphere that was envisioned to highlyengage the students.Incoming freshmen were enticed by a one-on-one laptop initiative, the prospect of no tests andvery little homework, and a formal agreement with an in-state engineering college which offeredguaranteed acceptance to those who met specified requirements. To encourage students of allabilities to apply, admission standards were kept relatively low, the key condition being anability to perform at grade level in math. For those below this level, provisional acceptance couldbe offered. Four years after the academy opened its doors, 340 students were enrolled
first-semester course which has three mainobjectives: (1) to prepare students for the rigor of future engineering classes; (2) to providestudents with a solid foundation of basic engineering skills; and (3) to introduce students to thedifferent engineering majors available at Clemson and possible career options. In Fall 2014, theGE program enrolled 1215 new freshman and 177 new transfer students1.Promoting problem solving development in first year engineering courses is critical to ensuringstudents’ transition successfully into upper-division courses and ultimately to a practicingengineer2. Innovative approaches to teaching problem solving skills have the potential ofappealing to a broader range of students in engineering3. “Traditional
Course Review (EOCR) processas the means to achieve these ends. More importantly however, the EOCR process instills aculture of assessment into all of our instructors, both junior and senior faculty.IntroductionA. Program Quality, Assessment and AccreditationThe goal of every undergraduate engineering department is to deliver a quality, but cost effectiveprogram to its students. More specifically, that its graduates attain the stated program objectivesand thereby be successful in their professional careers. The students, alumni, upperadministration and other constituents not only expect, but demand such achievement. A largemeasure of a program’s quality is it satisfying the criteria provided by such accreditation bodiesas ABET. Put another way
of solar furnaces he designed to help a low income community reduce their energy bills. This project was recently featured on NPR, the Denver Post and earned him the title ”Community Game Changer of the Month” from CBS Denver. He also was recently nominated for the Carnegie U.S. Professor of the Year award and the Presidential Award for STEM mentoring, both related to this project. Previous to his academic career Aaron Brown worked in the aerospace industry on such projects as the Mars Curiosity landing mechanism and Hubble robotics mission.Dr. Jeno Balogh, Metropolitan State University of Denver Page 26.274.1
asproject mentors. This project was conducted in close contact with several civil engineeringpractitioners who shared a professional perspective with the students. This integration andexposure to practitioners will help the students in their career planning process as well as later intheir professional life.Classroom Organization Students from a Freshman Civil Engineering Design course (CE195 – Freshman Design),a Junior Structures Laboratory class (CE 382 – Computer Aided Structural Analysis/Design andExperimentation ), and a Graduate Structures class (CE 564 - Numerical Methods in StructuralAnalysis) participated by vertically integrating the subject matter among these classes.Following are the highlights of the way the program was
Education Administration from George Washington University (Washington, DC). Under Mr. Goss’ direction, thousands of global engineering professionals from various corporate organizations have advanced their companies and employee’s careers with training through executive seminars, certifications, short courses and media distributed graduate degree programs.Dr. Philip Regier, Arizona State University Dr. Philip Regier is University Dean for Educational Initiatives and CEO of EdPlus at ASU. Page 26.307.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Starbucks College Achievement Plan: An Innovative Educational PartnershipOn
. Page 26.314.2Pedagogical ContextA controls laboratory experience should prepare students for a career in control systems 4 byperforming the following steps: building the system, 5 modeling and analyzing the system,developing a controller to meet performance requirements, simulating the controller and system,observing the physical system, collecting the data, and using the data to improve the systemmodel or control tuning. 6,7 Experiments based on DC motors 1,2 and inverted pendulums 6,8 havebeen identified to meet these goals for controls laboratory experiences.To date, five experiments have been designed for our new kit: introduction to the sensors,introduction to the equipment, first principles system identification, black box
Paper ID #13813Crafting a Successful High School Engineering ProgramMs. Marie Anne Aloia, Bayonne High School Marie is an alternate route teacher with an educational background in math, physics, chemical engineering and computer science. As the first girl in her family to go to college, and maybe to prove the point, she earned two bachelor’s degrees, one from Montclair State University by day, and 8 years later, one from New Jersey Institute of Technology, by night, while working full time by day at Exxon Research and Engineering. While a traditional female career, like teaching, was the last thing on her mind, she was
design, manufacturing, and instrumentation.Prof. Amos G. Winter V, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Amos Winter is the Ratan N. Tata Career Development Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechan- ical Engineering at MIT. He earned a B.S. from Tufts University (2003) and an M.S. (2005) and Ph.D. (2011) from MIT, all in mechanical engineering. Prof. Winter’s research group, the Global Engineering and Research (GEAR) Lab, characterizes the unique technical and socioeconomic constraints of emerg- ing markets and then uses engineering science and product design to create high-performance, low-cost, globally-relevant technologies. The group primarily focuses on assistive devices, brackish water desali- nation
participation, and a summary of lessons learned from thesepolicy experiences.I. IntroductionPolicy entrepreneurs promote significant policy change, and usually: have social acuity, defineproblems, build teams and lead by example1. Entrepreneurs “…wait in and around governmentwith their solutions (already) in hand, waiting for problems to float by to which they can attachtheir solutions, waiting for a development in the political stream they can use to theiradvantage”2. The policy agenda setting process “is one of choices looking for issues, problemslooking for decision situations, solutions looking for problems, and politicians looking for petproblems or policies by which they might advance their careers” 2-3. There are negativedefinitions of policy
- each team found particular difficulties in doing this, but the experience is viewed (both by instructors and students) as beneficial for the students' early career. c. The "client" for the project was represented by the multidisciplinary research team (including views from an agricultural economist, a systems engineer, the director of a renewable energy outreach effort for farming coops, and a policy analyst). Such multidisciplinary input from the "clients" tended to inhibit the student teams' independent search for multidisciplinary information on their own, but it tended to sharpen their action and
pathways study of engineering undergraduates, in Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education. 2008: Pittsburgh, PA. p. 1-17.2. Pierrakos, O., et al. On the development of a professional identity: engineering persisters vs engineering switchers. in Proceedings of the 39th Frontiers in Education Conference. 2009. San Antonio, TX: IEEE.3. O'Callaghan, E.M. and N.D.E. Jerger, Women and girls in science and engineering: Understanding the barriers to recruitment, retention and persistence across the educational trajectory. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 2006. 12: p. 209-232.4. Mau, W.C., Factors that influence persistence in science and engineering career
. After that a newprogram proposal was submitted and approved by the institute’s governing body.Results and DiscussionThe selected Engineering Technology program has both major and support courses to preparegraduates for technical and supervisory careers in a variety of industries. The program combinestechnical knowledge with communications skills and teamwork to provide the flexibility neededin today’s rapidly changing marketplace. The selected program educational objectives are: Demonstrate technical proficiency in the field Apply quantitative reasoning and critical thinking in solving technical problems Effectively communicate technical knowledge, ideas, and proposals to others, including upper management Lead
description of thesecourses to include the topics covered in the training sessions, thus making them an essential partof the course content.What We Hope to Achieve: We want to expose our students, faculty, and staff to inclusion anddiversity issues of which they might not be aware. By requiring students to go through training inboth the sophomore and seniors years, we hope to achieve maximum impact. The early exposureas sophomores will give the students a chance to apply the concepts they learn throughout theiracademic careers, while the second round of training as seniors will serve as a refresher coursebefore they begin their team-based senior projects and, later, enter the engineering workforce.We specifically designed this training curriculum to
2 =0.04682564∴F(t) = 0.2164i.e., 21.64 devices would fail after 10 years.3. Correlation Between Fundamentals and Preparing the Workforce for21st Century. The technology is evolving all the time, but the fundamentalprinciples hardly change. It is therefore the solemn duty of instructors in theclassroom to integrate the fundamentals in any State-of-Art technology. Thiswill ensure that the engineering students who are product of such teachingmethodology never become obsolete. During my own teaching tenure I havegraduated several hundreds of students who are placed in the high techindustry regionally, nationally, as well as internationally, who are vibrantand dynamic throughout their careers as have been found from the surveysof
more motivating, appealing and thereforeefficient manner through the use of digital animation and computer software7. In addition toutilizing methods like these in the classroom, the authors of this paper are putting forth additionaleffort to better prepare students for their career after college. This is being accomplished byprovided students with instructions describing how to create these interactive images on theirown. The idea is that they can become better acquired with the software which could beappealing to future employers, and they can use these skills for verifying the solution to varioushomework assignments in a variety of classes, and the like outside of college.Model DevelopmentThe topics of the interactive images (recorded
- ing his MAT as part of Boston University’s STEEP program which gives students the ability to earn an engineering BA and MAT in 5 years. Michael is also a member of BU’s varsity cross country and track and field teams and volunteers an after-school program for Boston Public School students. A native of Boston, Michael would like to return to the Boston Public Schools as a Math/STEM teacher after completion of the STEEP program.Dr. Gretchen Fougere, Boston University Dr. Fougere has split her career thus far in industrial and academic research and product development, management, and STEM education. At Boston University, she leads and has founded several nationally impactful technology and engineering programs that
to optimize the model. In our contrived problem, students are forced torethink the model, and how experiment can feed back and integrate to modeling efforts. Thisprofoundly reinforces the importance of virtual and real systems integration as a skill for the newknowledge manufacturing age.Current Course Status and ExpansionWe have now offered this course twice to a total of 32 graduate students. The courses have beenco-instructed by two faculty, one Adjunct Professor (with a 35-year professional career) in thefinite element-based simulation content of the course, and the second instructor in theexperimental and data analysis portion of the class (Figure 3). The OEM P.E. also gave lecturesin the importance and the use of testing and
participants are being surveyed using established valid and reliable measuresto identify any changes in students’ professional identity, research self-efficacy, intentions topursue graduate education and careers in biomedical engineering, and thinking and working likea scientist/engineer. Participants are also being surveyed to determine the extent to whichparticipation influences their sense of belonging as a researcher and development ofcommunication skills.Since this REU Site began in 2015, pre- and post-program interviews and surveys of BMECUReS REU participants have been conducted for only one cohort at this time. However, thepreliminary results are encouraging in that they suggest that the BME CUReS REU participantsexperienced increases in
Paper ID #17510A Comparison and Evaluation of Aeronautical Engineering Learning Out-comes using an Airborne Flight Laboratory and a Flight Simulator Labora-tory.Mr. Raymond Colin Lewis, University of New South Wales at the Australian Defence Force Academy Commenced flying career in the Australian Defence Force; became an Airline Pilot; returned to university to inform work as a Human Factors facilitator for the airline. Worked in Middle East as pilot before commencing as a Senior Lecturer for the University of New South Wales (Canberra) in 2001. As well as teaching, operated University aircraft for Aeronautical Engineering
forthe quality of life and welfare of the society. However the skills listed above are highly correlatedwith the quality level of engineering education given. Country specific educational habits andopportunities affect the learning pattern of individuals enrolled in engineering programs andtherefore have impact on the career and future. In this study, possible improvement suggestionsfor the engineering education in Turkey will be given while comparing the teaching methods andconditions of two Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) accreditedsurveying engineering education programs in Turkey and USA.1. IntroductionEngineering education in Turkey and USA are given with different number of total credits,curriculum, degree and
countries. For example in Pakistan firstBiomedical Engineering program was offered in early 1990’s. The major cause was lack ofresources and awareness which eventually resulted in absence of defined career path neither inacademia nor in industry. The situation is changing now with a positive rate. However, there stillis only a small fraction of students opting for this field in their undergraduate studies. This hasposed a challenge to academia to introduce students of different background to thismultidisciplinary field. A new introductory course for undergraduate ECE students was neededespecially. Several courses are offered at various institutes for non-biomedical students; howevera single course covering the breadth of this field without going
Pennsylvania State University. Following completion of his Ph.D., he took a faculty position in The Department of Kinesi- ology and Health at The University of Wyoming. After three years in this position, he decided to pursue a more research intensive career path and undertook postdoctoral training in Biomedical Engineering at The Mayo Clinic. In 2009, he began a faculty position in the Department of Health, Exercise, and Sport Sciences at Texas Tech University. In January 2012, Dr. Domire joined East Carolina University as an Associate Professor in Department of Kinesiology. Dr. Domire’s work focuses on the impact of tissue material properties on physiological and mechanical function. He also conducts research on computer
. Julie P Martin, Clemson University Julie P. Martin, Ph.D. is an associate professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson Univer- sity. Her research agenda has focused on diversity and inclusion in engineering education. In particular, her NSF-funded CAREER work has investigated how social relations—operationalized as social capi- tal—influence student academic decisions and success, especially for underrepresented and underserved students. Her CAREER research supports the need for continued proactive outreach, educational and support systems that have the potential to form ”resource-rich” networks in which students receive infor- mation and resources in routine exchanges. Dr. Martin’s current projects
agriculture and preparing them for careers in agriculture,horticulture, or dairy; 2) to acquaint its students with on-going thrust programs and relatedtransfer of technology programs in agricultural and allied areas; and 3) to help its studentsinteract with various agriculture and horticultural based industrial units in the region forinternships and placements. The college had poor performance for a few years before 2016. For example, the passingpercentage of its third (final) year students in 2015-16 was merely 16%. The first author joinedthe college as its principal (administrative head or dean) at the start of the academic year 2016-17and the second author joined the parent body Shri Shivaji Shikshan Prasarak Mandal of thecollege as its
, the CivilEngineering structural analysis class used the truss from the outdoor classroom as one of theirclass assignments, their design work (Figure 10) was used by the constructed managementstudents to fabricate the roof trusses (Figure 11). Figure 10: Roof Truss – As Designed Figure 11: Roof Truss – As ConstructedThis use of Micro-House Design/Construction projects in the curriculum exposes students tomaterial that is realistic, but not of overwhelming scope8. The students are given assignmentsthat are manageable, and that increase in scope and complexity over the course of a student’sacademic career. As a particular project progresses over time, students will be involved in theestimation, purchasing, planning
Paper ID #22355Investigating Influences on First-year Engineering Students’ Views of Ethicsand Social ResponsibilityMs. Swetha Nittala, Purdue University, West Lafayette Swetha is currently a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue. Her current work includes identifying and developing leadership and technical competencies for early career engineers and managers. She integrates her research in Engineering Education with prior background in Human Resource Management and Engineering to understand better ways to manage technical talent in organi- zations.Tasha Zephirin, Purdue University, West Lafayette
engineering educa- tion. His current duties include assessment, team development and education research for DC Colorado’s hands-on initiatives.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on
need and well understood career path for traditional disciplines it is clear thatmany of the skills needed to participate in the future workforce do not fit neatly into a particulardiscipline. An increasing number of jobs and professions require knowledge and skills that arenot provided through traditional coursework. Big data analysis and artificial intelligence are twosuch topics that individuals from traditional disciplines including electrical engineers,mechanical engineers, civil engineers and others are requesting that are not part of a traditionalcurriculum.The University Cincinnati Master of Engineering program provides a flexible platform on whichto construct new degree programs intended to meet the emerging needs of the workforce
computer science, engineering, and applied math through a comprehensive professional development program that included targeted lab-based research experience focused on computer science (CS) and engineering aligned with NGSS and advanced lesson study; • To build and maintain long-term collaborative partnerships between middle and high school teachers and the university research community that positively impact student achievement and career paths.These programs have served middle and high school teachers and their students in urban settings.To date, we have served 87 middle and high school teachers and their 12,436 students (combinedin nine years; 2010-2018). Accordingly, the programs had both broad-based and deep impact