covered in the course by integrating experiencesusing a FE analysis program, b) provide students with a basic understanding of FE theory, c)provide students with the skill set needed to model and analyze combined load problems using aFE analysis program; and d) provide students with an understanding of how element type, meshsize, support conditions, and other modeling decisions may impact FE analysis results.Previous studies have sought to incorporate FE modeling and analysis content as early as thefreshman year into the engineering curriculum. However, implementing these approaches inStrength of Materials courses often requires students to spend considerable time learning FEtheory before being able to use commercial FEA programs. A few studies
discipline to narrowly defined engineering technology activities; b) an ability to apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to engineering technology problems that require limited application of principles but extensive practical knowledge; c) an ability to conduct standard tests and measurements, and to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments; d) an ability to function effectively as a member of a technical team; e) an ability to identify, analyze, and solve narrowly defined engineering technology problems; f) an ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical and non-technical environments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical
c 4.18 3.75 4.06 a 4.17 4.10 4.00 f 4.12 3.88 3.74 d 4.05 3.91 3.88 g-‐3 3.91 3.77 3.90 i 3.88 3.73 3.69 b 3.71 3.72 3.77 j 3.26 3.35 3.31 g-‐1 3.25 3.52 3.37 h 3.19 3.40 3.29 g-‐2 3.15 3.46
Arthur B. Powell Rutgers University Rutgers University muteb.alqahtani@gse.rutgers.edu powellab@andromeda.rutgers.eduDynamic geometry environments can support learning of geometry through meditating learners’activity. To understand how dynamic geometry environment mediate the activity of mathematicsteachers, we used Rabardel’s categories of instrument mediations in an instrument-mediatedactivity [1, 2]. We analyzed the discursive and inscriptive interactions of 4 mathematics teacherswho worked for 15 weeks in a team to construct geometric figures and solve open-endedgeometrical problems in a collaborative, dynamic geometry environment. In addition
Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2), 29.9. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2009). Development of a classification system for engineering student characteristics affecting college enrollment and retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 361.10. Doolen, T., & Long, M. (2007). Identification of retention levers using a survey of engineering freshman attitudes at oregon state university. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 721-734. doi:10.1080/0304379070152078411. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139-151.12. Strobel, J., & Pan, R
). 100 Principles of Game Design. New Riders.12. Faber, M., Unfried, A., Corn, J., & Townsend, L. W. (2012). Student Attitudes toward STEM: The Development of Upper Elementary School and Middle / High School Surveys. Friday Institute for Educational Innovation.13. Falkner, K., Vivian, R., & Falkner, N. (20015). Teaching Computational Thinking in K-6: The CSER Digital Technologies MOOC. Australian Computing Educaiton Conference, 27-72.14. Google. (2015). Retrieved from Blockly: https://developers.google.com/blockly/15. Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2009). Effects of Inquiry-based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence. International
based on multiagent framework with applications to the power grid, and the integration of an intelligent virtual laboratory environment in curriculum. He is an associate editor of Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems: Series B, and is a member of IEEE, ASEE, and Sigma Xi.Dr. Michael Haney, University of IdahoDr. Michael John Santora, University of Idaho Dr. MIchael Santora is a Clinical Assistant Professor at University of Idaho since Fall of 2013. He has worked in industry as a R&D Controls Engineer creating OEM machinary. He specializes in controls, embedded systems and automation.Dr. Brian K. Johnson, University of Idaho, Moscow Brian K. Johnson received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering
Taxonomy, students apply these fundamentals in agroup construction simulation known as the K’NEXercise. Upon completion of theK’NEXercise, and armed with a better understanding of how to utilize project controls tomanage construction, students work in groups to design a base camp in an austere environment.In support of these three sections of the course, CE450 – Construction Management has thefollowing course objectives: a. Develop, refine and manage the triple constraints of a project (Scope, Budget and Schedule) throughout the Project Life Cycle Phases. b. Plan, organize, estimate, schedule and control a construction project (K’NEXercise). c. Design a base camp and its construction.For the K’NEXercise, students in each section are
). Corresponding pins of each connector are permanentlyinterconnected by the PCB. Figure 1 shows The BitBoard layout and nomenclature.Connector A is a 40-pin header plug used to connect The BitBoard to other devices such as anAltera DE1. Connectors B and C are 40-pin header sockets used to connect signals to thesolderless breadboard using jumper wires.A BitBoard connected to a DE1 via a forty-conductor ribbon cable is shown in Figure 2. TheDE1 provides power and input/output to The BitBoard. Altera has recently released a newdevice, the DE0-CV2, that is also compatible with The BitBoard. Power LED Solderless Breadboard PCB Forty-Pin Header Socket (B) Forty-Pin Header Plug (A
when predicting the behavior of the biasing network. To this end, we designed a taskto further investigate the nature of student difficulties with biasing networks. Although therehave been previous work on filters and phase relations in ac circuits in engineering courses5,6, to Fig. 1. (a) Standard schematic of a typical biasing network encountered in a transistor amplifier circuit. (b) Thévenin equivalent circuit for the same biasing network, which is the circuit used in this assessment. the best of our knowledge, this is the first investigation of student understanding of ac biasing(and
., Froyd, J., Merton, P., & Richardson, J. (2004). The Evolution of Curricular Change Models within the Foundation Coalition. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(1), 37–47. 4. Fournier-Bonilla, S. D. B., Watson, K. ., Malavé, C. ., & Froyd, J. (2001). Managing Curricula Change in Engineering at Texas A&M University. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(3), 222–235. 5. Borrego, M. (Virginia T. (2007). Development of engineering education as a rigorous discipline: A study of the publication patterns of four coalitions. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 5–18. 6. Bjorklund, S. a., & Colbeck, C. L. (2001). The View from the Top: Leaders’ Perspectives on a Decade of Change in
accessibility andavailability of laboratory facilities offered by the department. In dealing with this issue, a mobilelaboratory kit 'Analog Discovery' (AD) kit is integrated into EML and offered to all students. Fig. 2shows the AD kit, its pin-out, and the software interface [15]. (a) (b) (c) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Fig. 2. a) Analog Discovery kit, b) pin-out, and c) interface of ‘Waveform’. The AD kit is a small (3.2"×2.6"×0.8"), portable and low-cost ($99 for US student) multifunctioninstrument that can measure, record and generate analog and digital signals. Driven by a
), 139-153.14. Hrastinski, S. (2008). What is online learner participation? A literature review. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1755-1765.15. Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 213-23016. International Council on Systems Engineering (2015) INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities, 4th Edition, Wiley.17. He, W. (2013). Examining students’ online interaction in a live video streaming environment using data mining and text mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 90-102.18. Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject
HSNGB 1 Housing Back Custom 3D printed part $0.25 $0.25 9 INSTR 1 Circuit Design handout Appendix - - Total Cost: $2.53 $1.71Step 1. The large square pad on the Printed Circuit Board (PCB) must be tinned for the batterycontact (Figure 1). a. PCB Front b. PCB Back Figure 1. Printed Circuit Board Battery PadStep 2. The battery holder (BT) is installed on the bottom of the printed circuit board (PCB)with its open side towards the lower edge. Its two terminals are then soldered into place on thetop side of the board (Figure 2
disciplines.The current sustainability programs include: a) a whole school aerobic food waste composting system and organic farming, b)energy consumption monitoring of existing buildings, c) upcoming installation of an air pollution monitoring equipment thatwill correlate with the data collected by the Hong Kong government, d) a Center for Renewable Energy Education that willteach students about RE and also produce solar energy for classroom consumption, e) an underwater robotics program wherestudents are designing and building ROVs for marine debris collection, and f) a student lead environmental group thatmanages the paper and used cooking oil recycling on campus. The above listed programs integrate the fundamental scienceand math concepts with
eight-week, common course on the fundamentals of materialsscience and engineering, weekly research meetings leading to brainstorming of ideas, feedbackand support, and weekly lesson plan seminars and (b) a diverse and sustainable set of educationalactivities for translation to the home institutions of the teachers.A major goal of any RET program is to create partnerships between the university site andparticipating schools that allow for translation of research experiences and new knowledgegained into classroom activities. We learnt that incorporation of lesson plans developed by theteachers into their existing courses is difficult--- there is little time to bring in new materialbecause of demands to cover standards-based content that students
. (2012). Education for Life and Work:Developing Transferrable Knowledge and Skill in the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.:The National Academies Press.9 Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning: Areview of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning (PDF). Powerful Learning:What We Know About Teaching for Understanding. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass10 Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning (PDF).11 Huhta, Ari (2010). "Diagnostic and Formative Assessment". In Spolsky, Bernard andHult, Francis M. The Handbook of Educational Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.pp. 469–482.12 Nicol, David; Macfarlane-Dick, Debra (2005). Rethinking Formative Assessment inHE: a theoretical model
Paper ID #17478The Relationship Between Course Assignments and Academic Performance:An Analysis of Predictive Characteristics of Student PerformanceMrs. Deborah Ann Pedraza, Texas Tech University I am a Systems and Engineering doctoral student at Texas Tech University. I have Bachelor’s degree in the Mathematics from The University of Houston - Victoria, an MBA - The University of Houston - Vic- toria, and a Master’s Degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering - The University of Massachusetts- Amherst. I teach Mathematics, Engineering, and Computer Science at Cuero High School in Cuero, TX and adjunct for The Victoria
-9288.1029.5. Guan, J., et. al., (2009), Innovation Strategy and Performance during Economic Transition: Evidences in Beijing,China, Research Policy, 38: 802-812.6. Bagchi-Sen, S. (2001). Product Innovation and Competitive Advantage in an Area of industrial Decline: TheNiagra Region of Canada. Technovation, 21: 45-54.7. Van Horne, C., Frayret, J., Poulin, D. (2006). Creating Value with Innovation: From Centre Expertse to ForestProducts Industry, Forest Policy and Economics, 8: 751-761.8. Boyle, A., (2008). Engineering’s Greatest Challenge: Our survival. Available athttp://www.nbcnews.com/id/23175788/ns/technology_and_science-innovation/t/engineerings-greatest-challenge-our-survival/#.VnliDPkrJmM , accessed December 21, 2015.9. Obama, B. (2013
the semester (see Appendix A) and became less detailed as the semesterprogressed (see Appendix B).Hands-on activities introduced concepts that the students had not previously studied. Rather thanpresenting the mathematical derivation as the introduction to a topic, students were again dividedinto groups and given materials and actions to impose on these materials. A hands-on activity foreach major course topic was created (reactions, stress/strain axial loading, torsion, and bending)to introduce the basic concepts. A provided outline for these “discovery labs” aimed to help thestudents to first observe and describe a physical phenomenon and then represent itmathematically. For example, students were asked to build models of different joints
education and research departments, and UAS technol- ogy demonstrations involving outside entities. He has served in a variety of operational assignments as a C-130H, RQ-4A/B and Air Commando pilot. He has been engaged in multiple combat operations in Southwest Asia, Afghanistan, and Africa. He is a command pilot with approximately 3,800 hours includ- ing 1143 combat and 606 combat support hours. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Motivating Students with an Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Airmanship and Research Program1. IntroductionUAS operations have proven to be a key asset to the warfighter over the past decade and theiruse is expected to increase in the
’ oral presentations (see Appendix B).The categories cover various aspects of the content, delivery, and slide/poster design, which arediscussed on the first day of each workshop. The instructor also fills out the same review formduring the student presentations. These forms are collected and given to the students at the endof the presentations. In addition, audience members are encouraged to provide real-time oralfeedback to the presenter directly following the presentation.In the written evaluation of these workshops, which the students complete on the final session,there is a question asking how useful they felt the peer reviews were on a scale of one to ten.Because these workshops are part of a new program that began in January 2015, they
, the air stream reachesthe floor of the room and splits with a greater portion of it returning towards the inlet and therebycausing a recirculation zone. a) b) c) d)Figure 12 a), b), c), and d) x-velocity distribution over 5 seconds, Re = 427Experimental ResultsExperimental results were obtained by the students using Pitot tube measurements to evaluate theflow. They determined the velocity profile at a number of streamwise locations to help visualizethe streamwise development of the
% 84% Grade 82% 80% CGsection 78% GDsection 76% 74% 72% a b c d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 StudentcourselearningoutcomeFigure 6. Course assessment results for each learning outcomeThe common learning outcomes are:At the end of the course, students will demonstrate the ability to: a) Communicate mechanical designs via freeform, orthographic and axonometric hand sketching b) Read and interpret mechanical drawings of parts and assemblies c) Demonstrate familiarity
, “How do youdescribe your gender” that only allows for a single choice24? Further, including both “Male” and“Transgender Male” in an attempt to correct this problem immediately “othering” (i.e.,intentionally or unintentionally classifying a group as non-normative) the trans people answeringthe survey. Adding a modifier to the normative male communicates that people who identify astrans are not part of the “normal” categories; this is especially true when nonbinary gendersappear after the binary options seemingly as an afterthought. Another example is when binarycategories appear alongside trans and “cisgender”b options. While an improvement overquestions which list “Transgender” as a mutually exclusive category for gender (as opposed to“Male
school” 6. Miaoulis19 argued thatinterest in engineering and science begins to drop off in middle school, therefore the curriculumneeds to be reinforced to help students succeed in real-world problems and maintain studentinterest and enrollment. To address even more nascent student beliefs, Engineering isElementary, a curriculum targeting students in middle school and even younger, has pointed toevidence that (a) people choosing careers in engineering and science gain interest as early aselementary school, (b) interest in science tends to decline after elementary school, and (c)engaging students with this material at an early age can help them consider engineering andscience as a future career, which would not have happened otherwise 20.If we
engineering students. This process included firstidentifying suitable problems. A suitable problem for the DST is defined as an authentic, real-world design problem that has yet to be solved, and that would require significant effort, time,and expertise to solve; the purpose of the DST is not to assess ability to solve a design problem,but rather to measure how students get started framing a design problem.We located two appropriate problems for the DST, both from an email requesting ideas forsolving technological problems, issued by Deutscher Technologiedienst GmbH (used withpermission, and with minor adaptations for our purposes, see Appendix B & C).The DST was given during class time in the first week of class. Students were given 15 minutesto
., Carlson, L. E., and Sullivan J. F., “Improving Engineering Student Retention through Hands-On Team Based, First-Year Design Projects, 2007 ASEE 31st International Conference on Research in Engineering Education, Honolulu, HI2. Marra, R. M., Palmer, B., and Litzinger T.A., “The Effects of a First Year Engineering Design Course on Student Intellectual Development as Measured by the Perry Scheme”, Journal of Engineering Education, January 2000 pp 39-453. Hoit, Marc, and Ohland, M.,”The Impact of a Discipline-Based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention”, Journal of Engineering Education, January 1998, pp 79-854. Whitfield, R. J., Allam, F. Y., and Riter, E. A. ,”An Overview of Highly Successful First Year
rubrics was to rate theperformance of each student to the criteria predefined in the rubric. It would have been beneficialto record the number of students being assessed in the tables in Appendices B, C, and D. Thesample size may impact interpretation of results. For example, in Appendix D, there weresignificantly fewer students in the summer than in fall and spring semesters.Performance levels may be divided into three to six point scales and given labels such as basic-proficient-advanced. In this paper, PIs were assessed on a scale of 1-4. Others have effectivelyassessed PIs on a scale of 1-3, further simplifying the assessment process [6]. Having three levelsof performance allows the instructor to easily map the grades to rubrics levels
existing sharedmaterials to make the content current.Negotiating a Joint Enterprise: Developing Showcase Lessons and a Model InfrastructureCourse OutlineA successful aspect of the CIT-E CoP has been to bring members together for summerworkshops to build relationships and move the work forward (see Appendices A and B foragendas). In 2014, individuals came together for an initial three-day CIT-E workshop. Prior tothe workshop, participants met regularly through webinars to discuss the shared vision for CIT-Eand to understand participants’ needs for materials and resources. The 2014 summer workshopincluded an idea exchange poster session where members shared their current or proposedinfrastructure course models and solicited feedback and questions