: • An ability to function effectively on teams (Outcome e) • An ability to communicate effectively (Outcome g) • A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning (Outcome h) • An ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibility (Outcome i) • A respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal, and global issues (Outcome j)In the Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) Program at Milwaukee School ofEngineering (MSOE), the Capstone Project course has been used a curricular point for bothinstruction and assessment with respect to these outcomes. The Capstone Project course is a 10
the ability to generate sets of working drawingsthrough an intense final group project. For the past three years, the approach to this final projecthas been for the instructor to give a fairly well defined description of a problem and leave thedevelopment of an early-stage solution to the creativity of the students. This approach hasyielded positive results with respect to preparing them for their sophomore and senior levelengineering design courses. However, in order to incorporate the ethical and societalresponsibility of the engineering profession, while maintaining the traditional emphasisnecessary in graphics science, a service-learning element has been included in the final projectbeginning Fall 2001 wherein the students define their
. International Experiences 10 Tours Begin 10a. Library Skills 10b. Student Panel 11a. Ethics 11b. Registration Review (Registration begins this week) 12 Fall Break – students work on projects, classes do not meet 13a. Units and Dimensions 13b. Estimation of Answers 14 Thanksgiving—students work on projects, classes do not meet 15a. Minidesign #3 Demonstration in Class 15b. Course Evaluation 16 Grade review, meetings with instructor Page
with rapid changes intechnology, they must also broaden their focus, cultivate entirely new skills, and consider unfamiliar territory suchas economics, policy, and ethics. In this paper, we suggest an unlikely avenue of potential relief: history. Morespecifically, we report our experiences over the past half dozen years with team-teaching a course entitled“Electrical Engineering in American Life.” An outgrowth of earlier reforms intended to enhance retention ofengineeringstudents, this course has evolved in ways we believe make it an ideal instrument for implementing the letter and thespirit of the new criteria in engineering education. The roots of our course go back to January 1993, when engineers and historians at Georgia Tech joined
students who are working can more easily relate to ethical issues, can sense the interpersonalissues involved and can sort out the responsibility lines. Typically, these students enter college fiveto fifteen years later than the traditional students, work full time in industry, and invest five to tenyears earning an A.S. degree. For instance, they pick up well on the career implications of mostethical dilemmas. They bring to the classroom an appreciation for the pressures in the industrialworld and the methods used to cope with them. The younger students, in general, try to follow atypical textbook approach in their course of action, and then come up with a solution, which,although correct in theory, sometimes would not go over well in a real
effectively and to be effective teachers as well as learners.Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education• Ability to cope with ethical dilemmas and conduct themselves in an ethical and professional manner.In addition, the program seeks to increase and enhance the involvement of women andunderrepresented minorities in the networking and general information technology areas and toprovide educational benefits to undergraduate and masters students in the participating academicdepartments. Multiple implementation strategies are being applied.• Creating a research program focused on overcoming barriers to achieving a vision of the future
in ResearcherReflexivity, Adhering to Research Ethics, Framing the Research Problem and Questions,Identifying a Critical Framework, Conducting the Literature Review, Choosing ResearchMethods, Engaging with Participants, Crafting Instrumentation and Collecting Data, Analyzingand Interpreting Data, and Reporting on Research.After analyzing 12 standards bodies from seven countries and several dozen research articles[12–23], the working group created guidelines for each of the major areas. For example, Figure 2shows the resultant critical framework guidelines resulting from the analysis.4 ReflectionThrough our analysis, the working group merged valuable standards offering insights, guidance,and concrete examples for conducting education research
anything, 3) collaborates, and 4) innovates. Theentrepreneurial/enterprising engineer needs a global perspective and the globalization of roboticsbrings several implications for robotics engineers, including manufacturing, food production,defense, and telepresence.Thus, the globalization of robotics carries many potentially disruptive societal impacts.Destruction of existing jobs / creation of new jobs. Enhanced security / reduced individualliberty. Longer lifespan / quality of life. Telepresence / never quite being present. Because of thedisruptive potential of their craft, Robotics Engineers bear a special responsibility to humankind,embodied in a Code of Ethics for Robotics Engineers. We conclude that in addition to a broadand rigorous
procedures used. QA scope covered all operations and all Based on our quality policy to units of the Faculty including affiliatedpursue upgrading teaching and institutes. Working team from eachlearning, research process with good unit had been setup to review thequality taking into considerations both existing system. The procedures werecultural and ethics, the Faculty of then drafted to match withEngineering has therefore adopted the requirements and practices. Staff andCUQA system which comprised of 14 faculty were trained on requirements,basic and 7 progressive requirements. procedures and internal audit practices.The Faculty had then
exercises arealso an integral part of this REU experience. Environmental ethics, diversity and communityimpact of engineering activities are the topics of mini workshops. All these topics havetremendous relevance to pollution prevention and sustainability but can be absent from atraditional engineering curriculum. It is anticipated that the undergraduate research experiencepromotes interest in pursuing graduate school and strengthens leadership skills and self esteem.IntroductionMany engineering programs worldwide are integrating pollution prevention, green engineeringand sustainability modules in their traditional curriculum. The College of Engineering at RowanUniversity is taking numerous innovative measures to integrate environmental education
establishment of the Global Forum on Nuclear Education, Science, Technology, and Policy. Aditi holds undergraduate and doctoral degrees in Nuclear Science and Engineering from MIT. Her work, authored for academic as well as policymaking audiences, has been published in Nuclear Engineering and Design, Nature, Nuclear Technology, Design Studies, Journal of Mechanical Design, Issues in Science and Technology, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, and Inkstick. Aditi enjoys hiking with her dog, reading speculative fiction, and experimenting in the kitchen.Dr. Katie Snyder, University of Michigan Dr. Snyder is a lecturer for the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She teaches design, ethics, and
) teachundergraduate students, (2) administer a degree program (i.e., Department Chairs), (3) serveas a top-level administrator over all engineering degree programs (i.e., Deans), and (4) workprofessionally in engineering. Survey items address areas including instructional strategies,instructional technologies, assessment strategies, curricula, evaluation of teaching, andpreparation of graduates. With over 2100 respondents, these survey results can informconversations about the future of ECE education. This paper focuses on responses from theover 600 academic respondents. When asked about teaching and assessing problem solving,moral/ethical reasoning, and design, respondents were most likely to teach problem solvingand design. This suggests that ethics may
may have heard of frequently, may even fear violating, butmany students fail to integrate the underlying values and purposes of abiding by academicintegrity within their own lives. The debate over whether academic dishonesty is on the rise orwhether technology has altered the way that violations appear is ongoing; however, what isimperative is that engineering educators begin to work to integrate this crucial aspect of one’seducation into the objectives of their courses. Students need to learn that academic honesty is acritical part of their educational endeavors and that their future work as an engineer is dependentupon the professional ethics that they must uphold.There are many types of academic integrity violations, ranging from minor to
studentdevelopment. Those student development areas are: Knowledge (Critical Thinker), Relationships(Mentor), Ethics (Active Citizen), Well-being (Healthy Individual), and Service (Catalyst forPositive Change). By identifying these development areas, in the framework the university seeksto nurture personal leadership development within individuals as they interface with and interactwith their peers and the community, university and civic. The adapted model is shown in Figure3. The “pillars” serve as linkages between the university’s values and leadership identitydevelopment in a way that reflects the mission of the university in preparing students for their
thestudents involved obtained a thorough understanding of the engineering concepts and alsoimproved their soft skills, including team working, communication, and ethical and problemsolving skills. In-depth information about the evaluation results, course map and instructionalstrategy are provided in this paper.IntroductionEngineering curricula have experimented with multiple methodologies that expose students toreal-world problems. There are also deep concerns about American internationalcompetitiveness, amid indications that the U.S. is doing a relatively poor job at retaining andtraining students in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines14.Too many talented students get the impression from introductory courses that
Session 2661 Engineering, Technology and Society: Increasing the Dialogue Between Liberal Arts Majors and Engineering Students Joan A. Burtner Mercer UniversityAbstract The EC2000 Criterion 3 a-k outcomes have increased engineering educators’ awarenessof the importance of contemporary and global issues in undergraduate engineering education. Inan effort to increase college students’ understanding of ethical, professional, and contemporaryissues related to engineering, a senior-level discussion-based seminar has been offered at MercerUniversity
the basic principles intact: an emphasis on ethics and leadership, a spirit of pragmatism,and a pedagogical approach that emphasizes both experiential and classroom learning. Theprogram has experienced significant growth over the past 4 years, from 70 students in 2 cohortsin residence in 2007 to over 130 students in 4 cohorts today.The program is primarily targeted at working professionals with a bachelor’s degree inengineering or applied science and several years of experience. Key features that differentiate theTufts MSEM include a significant focus on imparting leadership knowledge and skills tailored toengineers in professional practice, an integrated, modular program architecture that allows forimmediate application of classroom learning
higher self-efficacy in using ChatGPT as a learning tool in comparison with othergender identities. Furthermore, Freshmen engineering students tend to have high perceptions onusing ChatGPT as a learning tool, while junior engineering students have the lowest. Finally,freshmen engineering students tend to have high perceptions on ease of accessing ChatGPT, whilesophomore engineering students have the lowest.Keywords: ChatGPT, concerns with ChatGPT, ethical considerationsIntroductionEngineers working in Open Artificial Intelligence (OpenAI) developed the language model ChatGenerative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT). It's a kind of artificial intelligence (AI) systemthat can produce text responses to a variety of questions and prompts that seem
: 1. pre-test, post-test of each student to determine knowledge gain, ability to apply knowledge and student creative thinking from the different delivery systems, 2. EKE (essential knowledge element) Protocol for rating of activities, reports etc., 3. EKE Protocol for rating of programs and course/instructional delivery, 4. discipline, subject/course-specific structure of knowledge, 5. ethics and life-long learning, and a 6. universal network/registry of epistecybernets and products. This paper focuses on the EKE Protocol for rating of programs and course/instructionaldelivery, particularly its usage in the assessment and evaluation of the interdisciplinarymaterials research program and plastics materials courses at
ADVANCED NANOTECHNOLOGY ENTREPRENEURIAL EDUCATION Christopher C. Ibeh Pittsburg State University (PSU), Pittsburg, KS 66762 AbstractDevelopment of the “Advanced Nanotechnology Entrepreneurship” course is an ongoing projectat PSU that is part of a three course entrepreneurship series funded through an NCIIA (NationalCollegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance) grant. The course focuses on product design anddevelopment with emphases on the entrepreneurial elements of team-based design,benchmarking, design optimization, on-time market entry, life cycle cost analysis [LCCA], datamining, patents, safety and ethics. The course is
has over 30 years’ experience in engineering practice and education, including industrial experience at the Tennessee Valley Authority and the US Army Space and Missile Defense Command. Her research inter- ests include Engineering Ethics, Image and Data Fusion, Automatic Target Recognition, Bioinformatics and issues of under-representation in STEM fields. She is a former member of the ABET Engineering Ac- creditation Commission, and is on the board of the ASEE Ethics Division and the Women in Engineering Division. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Can ABET Assessment Really Be This Simple?AbstractWith the hard roll-out of ABET’s new outcomes 1-7 in the 2019
educators will be “restricted” professionals [1]. Some countries however, such as the UK and Sweden, dorequire intending university faculty to have training in teaching and learning. It can be argued that such training servesas the teaching equivalent of the PE; the PEE, as it were.All of this implies a second characteristic of a profession, that is, that it possesses a codified body of knowledge andexpertise. A third characteristic of a profession is that it has agreed standards of behavior, and a set of ethical standardsthat members abide by or face sanctions for violating.This paper argues that, certifications or degrees aside, university teaching should be a professional activity and effectivetraining should be required. If engineering
as a member of an interdisciplinary team. 21. Self Directed Learning Demonstrate the ability for self-directed learning. 22. Ethical Responsibility Apply standard of professional and ethical responsibility to determine an appropriate course of action. Page 26.1465.4Department outcomes and identifies eight specific outcomes that are being used to assessprofession skills. Course embedded indicators on tests, assignments, and projects are used toevaluate each of the 22 CEE Department outcomes. Results from embedded indicators and othermeasures are evaluated to ensure overall desired performance
-world reinforcementof sustainable engineering practices and promotes the education of ethically responsible andinternationally aware students. We postulate that this move away from competition-basedmotivations and towards community service will be particularly appealing to non-traditionalengineering students such as minorities and women.This paper will examine the case study of EWB-Westlake High School, the first ever high schoolEWB chapter, which was chartered in the Fall of 2006, and conducted a work trip to Tanzania inJuly, 2007. The program assessment surveys address which specific activities were effective andwhich need future refinement, and explore the impact that an engineering service learningprogram can have on the future goals of the
Human Needs: Expanding the Scope of Engineering Senior DesignAbstractThe culminating design experience in engineering curricula is usually intended to provide aframework within which the emerging engineer can draw upon an acquired base of knowledge inhis or her discipline to solve an open ended problem in that discipline or in a multidisciplinarycontext requiring contributions from that discipline. In this paper, we show how the culminatingdesign experience can be framed so as to expand the scope of its contribution in the education ofengineering students. We describe a pedagogical framework within which educational outcomesassociated with multidisciplinary activity, legal, ethical, and professional responsibilities, and
Paper ID #42586Engagement in Practice: A Road Map for Academia and Non-Profit CollaborationKerrie Danielle Hooper, Florida International University Kerrie Hooper is currently an Engineering and Computing Education Ph.D. student at Florida International University. She obtained her Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from the University of Guyana in 2019 and then worked for two years in the industry as a Data Analyst & Systems Administrator, before pursuing her doctoral degree. Her research interests are in AI ethics, responsible technology in education, women’s careers in computing, and arts-based approach to STEM
, the committee identified Outcomes 5 – Material Science andOutcome 24 – Professional & Ethics as outcomes that may be challenging for programs to fullyimplement.The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis of Montana State University’scivil engineering curriculum with respect the BOK2 outcomes associated with the baccalaureatedegree. Specific emphasis is given herein to these identified “challenging” outcomes.Institutional ProfileOn February 16, 1893, the Agricultural College of the State of Montana was founded as thestate's land-grant college. Renamed The Montana College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts, theinstitution was popularly known as Montana Agricultural College, or MAC. By the 1920s, theinstitution's preferred
AC 2012-3847: CCLI: MODEL ELICITING ACTIVITIESDr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Shuman is the Founding Editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in engineering education literature, and is co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost
,feeding to their fear about saying the wrong thing.The disconnect between the two groups often results in explicitly marginalizing classroomenvironments, i.e., environments where students feel unwelcome from blatantly marginalizing ordiscriminatory behaviors [1]. The data demonstrates that faculty are interested in developingimplicitly inclusive classrooms but fear that their lack of expertise on these topics will lead tofailure and having a negative impact on students. However, students voiced strong support andinterest in having faculty discuss and teach about inclusivity and ethics in their engineeringclassrooms. To create implicitly inclusive environments, faculty are encouraged to acknowledgeand discuss such topics in their classes and
Paper ID #214362018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Infusing inclusion, diversity & social justice into the undergraduate Com-puter Science curriculum at Boise State UniversityProf. Donald Winiecki PhD, Boise State University Don Winiecki, Ed.D., Ph.D. is the ‘Professor of Ethics & Morality in Professional Practice‘ in the Boise State University, College of Engineering. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in ‘Foundational Values‘ and ‘Professional Ethics‘ in the Computer Science Department and Organizational Performance &