with their mentees on anindividual level. The semester concludes with DREAM Day, when all participating menteesvisit Rice University for a day to test their designs, tour campus engineering facilities, and askquestions of a student panel about the college experience. Mentors do not receive payment orcourse credit for their time, nor do they fulfill any university requirement by participating. This study focuses specifically on the motivations of the student organizers of DREAM,known as Head Mentors. In addition to leading the mentoring sessions, Head Mentors alsoattend weekly planning meetings, recruit and assign mentors to specific school mentorshipsessions, manage the logistics of transportation and school communication, and plan
understand why it happens, but asengineering faculty, we hope to discourage this practice. Reasons to choose a particular course to do the Honors contract unknown 11% backup plan 11% satisfy credit hours 22% 20% already know topic 33% 20% know instructor 67% 60% interested in the course 67% 100% interested in know already satisfy credit backup plan unknown the course instructor know topic hours faculty 67% 67% 33
courses based on the engineeringdiscipline (Statics for civil engineering, Circuits for electrical engineering, and Statics andCircuits for mechanical engineering). Therefore, graduation rates for engineering majors arebased on only those that make it through these Gateway courses. At The Citadel, students mustdeclare a major before they arrive to campus for their first semester. The Registrar’s Office thenbuilds the appropriate course schedule around their major choice. So each student counts ingraduation statistics from the day they enter The Citadel. Therefore, some type of plan wasneeded to address the issues mentioned above.The new Dean led an inclusive team to establish a six year strategic plan (LEAD 2018) whilepresenting data noting areas
with program planning, management, and evaluation and an academic interest in leadership de- velopment in academic contexts. She holds a M.A. in Education from Michigan State University and an M.A. in English from The Ohio State University. Page 26.1785.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 “Leaning In” by Leaving the Lab: Building Graduate Community through Facilitated Book DiscussionsAbstractThis paper describes the design, implementation and evaluation of a facilitated discussion seriesdesigned to build community among graduate students in STEM
students), then integrate that advice into an action plan. • Students in a difficult circumstance are not always good at integrating and acting on advice. The UGO staff discovered that students often did not follow up with ODOS (which was always part of our advice), or if they did, subsequent follow-up with the UGO or ODOS was lacking. Students struggled to manage and act on the on-going conversations across the UGO and ODOS offices, especially when they are in a Page 26.1049.4 compromised state due to their circumstances. • ODOS was not near the engineering precinct. The ODOS offices are centrally located on
. Screencasts can be created by instructors or by students, and they can be used in a variety of ways. In this interactive session, we will share successful examples and discuss best practices for creating and using screencasts in and out of your classroom. It's time for action: Creating a plan to engage students in active learning is sometimes challenging. Generating an active learning In this workshop, participants will learn about a variety of active learning plan techniques and then formulate a plan for implementing active learning in their own course or for an advanced practice teaching
to improve communication on technical issues withnon-technical students. It will at the same time provide non-technical students with anappreciation for both the benefits and the possible problems inherent in developing theseexciting new technologies.These courses will be of special interest for teachers, (primarily for high school scienceteachers, but probably for a broader range, and including pre-service.) The original plan was tooffer a composite university-credit summer course for teachers, but the local structure ofcontinuing education for teachers has changed, and the current plan is to record a one-time Page 26.1182.5workshop for future
. Studentsare to demonstrate capacity for teamwork, ability to identify lacking analysis andcritically but constructively pursue development of that analysis. The question that Page 26.1586.4faced us was to design course content and activities that supported students indemonstrating the abovementioned skills.In the course SweSoc, teachers‟ have made a tradition of beginning every semesterwith a poll among the students. The poll serves to identify the geographical andeducational background of students attending the course.Most students have theirbackground in city-planning, the second largest category is in information andcommunication technologies while the third
within the ‘ethics’ section of a senior level “Professional Issues” course. Duringthe two years that the course instructors have been using the EPSA method, they have found theinterdisciplinary EPSA scenarios to generate more enthusiastic and higher level discussion thancase studies that focus solely on ethics. This paper describes the use of the different EPSAscenarios, the standardized questions which are used to prompt the student discussion, the EPSArubric, the EPSA Summary Score, the facilitation plan, and also describes how the EPSA methodcan be incorporated for use at both the classroom and program level. All material described inthe paper is included in the paper’s appendices.BackgroundEngineering programs often contain a senior level
Q6: Race Q7: What degree plan are you most interested in? Q9: For each of the following engineering fields please describe your likeness level (9 point Likert scale – dislike extremely to like extremely): Q10: Please describe your level of understanding about each engineering discipline (5 point Likert scale – poor to excellent): Q11: Define answer from Q8 (open response that pulled Q8 answer automatically) Q12: I am interested in answer from Q8 because (open response that pulled Q8 answer automatically). Q13: What opportunities are associated with answer from Q8 (open response that pulled Q8 answer automatically)? Q14
has 7 US patents, of which 3 have been commercialized by the university. He has published at the 2013 conference on this topic. This work is a continuation of earlier research. We plan to leverage this in developing a state-of- the-art course on the Internet of things for our undergraduates in Spring ’15.Mr. Jean Lapaix, Florida Atlantic University I am a senior electrical engineering undergraduate at Florida Atlantic University. I am interested in science and engineering and applying them towards math education. I am also interested in incorporating control systems to make platforms more intelligent and robust.Charles Perry Weinthal Currently Seeking a Master’s in EE Commodore Business Machines: EE: Engineering
problem solving.1. IntroductionProblem solving is seen as a desirable skill for recent graduates1, and also for students ingeneral2–5. This paper analyses problem solving strategies of first year students in a newlydeveloped program. The program has been created to focus on developing students for a neweconomic and social reality, in which higher order thinking skills are the driving force. Higherorder skills, such as analysis, evaluation, and creation, are extremely important for criticalthinking and unstructured problem solving. Or-Bach6 indicates “…the retrieval and handling ofinformation; communication and presentation; planning and problem solving; and socialdevelopment and interaction…” (p. 17) are abilities much in demand by the general
, all play a role in each case.Case 1: The Peace Bridge is an international border crossing for approximately 6million cars, trucks, and buses a year, connecting the City of Buffalo, NY to FortErie, Ontario over the Niagara River.24 It is owned and operated by the tax-exempt Buffalo and Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority (PBA), which draws itsrevenue primarily from toll charges, duty-free sales, and lease payments on itsproperty.25 For the past 7 years, PBA has been trying to implement a majorexpansion project that would widen the Bridge entry point into the US in order toimprove vehicle access to the 16-lane US customs plaza in the Lower West Side ofBuffalo. PBA’s plans have been met with fierce resistance from residents livingclose to the
Page 26.331.16EngineeringGraduation Baseline 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017Rate 5-year averageSix Year 44% 44% 45% 47% 50% 54%MethodologyAn evaluation plan utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data was implemented usinginternal evaluation tasks focused on data collection via surveys. The quantitative data wasanalyzed utilizing descriptive statistics while the qualitative questions were analyzed usingcoding and themes. The following evaluation questions were addressed: (1) How have projectactivities impacted retention and performance of engineering undergraduate students? (2) Howhave the project’s mentoring activities impacted the mentors
education and making college-wide decisions on curriculum.Engineering design is a complex process that has been simplified to embrace a systematic loop,which can be easily taught to students and utilized by professionals. It is well recognized thatsimplified design loops do not represent all aspects of design, and research in engineeringeducation has addressed complexities; even so, there remain aspects of the design process thatneed further research. In particular, understanding how engineering design is shaped by factorslike institutional and organizational structure.Our prior work has led us to believe that design aspects like space and time organize the entiredesign process and need to be consider when planning and executing project [4
the third week of the fall semester at the end of aclass meeting of an upper level required technical communications class (ECOM) at a westernpublic land-grant institution. Surveys were administered over the span of a week and responseswere collected in class after participants finished the paper survey. The population consisted ofengineering majors who have taken at least two years of engineering courses. The class isdependent on a four year plan and has prerequisites that restrict students from taking the courseuntil their third year of engineering. A total of 202 survey responses (96% response rate) wereturned in from the participants. A 96% response rate was obtained for this survey administrationdue in part to the instructor’s mandatory
serving his third term as an elected member of the Board of Education for the Yellow Springs Public Schools, where he has been president, co-chaired the 2020 Strategic Plan, and served as the dis- trict’s legislative liaison. He also serves on advisory committees and boards for several local and national organizations, including the Dayton Literary Peace Prize, Learn to Earn, International Leadership Asso- ciation, Springfield Museum of Art, TEDxDayton, ThinkTV Public Broadcasting, and Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Community Partner Leadership Council. Sean has published and presented extensively on higher education, collaboration, civic engagement, and talent retention. He is also a principle investigator for the
this theatre course forengineers we introduce participants to theatre and performance as they analyze and performselected plays about science. While the course is allocated as a Humanities and Social Sciences(HSS) credit, it is led by faculty from the Engineering Communication Program [ECP]. Thisservice unit within the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering [FASE] supports curriculumdevelopment and delivery in communication and design across all departments. As a result,alongside our work in this course we work with engineering colleagues in core technical coursesand plan standalone communication courses, giving us insight into content and modes ofinstruction from the engineering discipline. With this background, we can challenge our
in their first three years of study (Figure1). These workshops are envisioned as experiential learning activities based on team-basedengineering activities. The first three workshops intend to provide an introduction to (1) team-forming and building, (2) communication, and, (3) conflict management, respectively. The lastthree workshops provide reinforcement and opportunities for application in the same areas and inmultidisciplinary settings, as well as instruction in planning, role development, and collaborativeand creative problem solving. The workshops are designed based on the principle that teamworkskills are best learned by doing1, i.e., by practicing in a context that approximates common teamexperiences in engineering, while also
fourmiddle school science and math teachers. Prior to the workshop, the engineers and educationresearchers created a standards-aligned curriculum consisting of five math and five sciencelessons aimed at mitigating content-specific pedagogical struggles through the integration ofrobotics. Unlike a technocentric approach, in which lessons are planned around a technologicalapplication,11 the development of each lesson was driven by content-specific needs. Throughoutthe PD, a TPACK perspective was employed to introduce each lesson to the teachers, allowingthem to examine, understand, and critique the teaching and learning benefits derived from therobot-based lesson. The strength of TPACK became apparent during the third week of PD wheninvestigating a
Evaluation and Action Research Asso- ciates and also serves in the same role with the Gates Millennium Scholars Program/UNCF. Prior to this, he served as the Director of the Center for Assessment, Planning and Accountability (CAPA) with the UNCF Special Programs Corporation (UNCFSP). Dr. Nagle joined UNCFSP to establish the center in November, 2004.Prior to joining UNCFSP, Dr. Nagle was the Research & Evaluation Specialist Team Lead at NASA Peer Review Services in Washington, D.C. working primarily with NASA’s Office of Ed- ucation.Dr. Nagle was a public school educator in Pennsylvania and North Carolina for 11 years and has worked in the research and evaluation field for the past 20 years.Dr. Nagle has a B.S. in
) described thatengineering design is considered a team process in multiple socio-technological dimensions, andwhich is also reflected in the ABET Student Outcomes. The ABET Student Outcomes includethe abilities to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, createa collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives (3.5)and to communicate effectively with a range of audiences (3.3) (Engineering AccreditationCommission, 2017). Furthermore, social cognitive and constructivist theories highlight theimportance of social activities in design learning (Ertmer & Newby, 2008). Accordingly,engineering design is usually taught in team-based learning environments, and students’ teamingis
programs. Specifically highlighted as part ofthe transfer model are curriculum alignment and mapping, degree-specific “flight” plans, andprogram-geared advising. Participating students must satisfy rigorous core requirements butthey customize their track and their electives. Figure 2-Overal Structure of the CAPTURE ProgramThe CAPTURE program has expanded computer science and computer engineering capacityas follows: FAU students and State College students with either an AA or AS will be qualified for admission to the program. Therefore, the program is designed with sufficient flexibility to accommodate students with different backgrounds. FAU and the State Colleges have developed a streamlined and
students. Jorge collaborates with NEWT’s In- dustry Liaison Officer and Innovation Ecosystem Director, and the Student Leadership Council in the planning of educational opportunities for NEWT graduate students and postdocs with the center’s indus- try partners and other professional development activities. At Rice, Jorge is an Adjunct Professor in the Civil & Environmental Engineering and Bioengineering Departments, where he developed and teaches CEVE/GLHT 314: Sustainable Water Purification for the Developing World, a project-based course on sustainable strategies for safe water supply in low-income and developing regions of the world. He col- laborates in other project-based courses at Rice, such as Introduction
into future plans for makerspaces on the Boise State campus. As an undergraduate and graduate student, she has been involved with the Society of Women Engineers, and also taught a materials science laboratory course as a graduate teaching assis- tant. She has volunteered at numerous STEM outreach activities on and off of the Boise State campus throughout her time as a student and is passionate about increasing diversity in STEM and helping girls and women to recognize that STEM is a path that is open to them if they want to take it.Ms. Katherine Christine Tetrick, Washington State University Katherine directs the Washington STate Academic RedShirt (STARS) program at Washington State Uni- versity. She holds a Master
: How well did your team integrate and capitalize on your diversity, 1 2 3 4 5 i.e., backgrounds, experiences, etc. Leadership: How effective was your leadership plan and leadership efforts in 1 2 3 4 5 achieving project objectives? Communication: How effective was your team’s internal and external 1 2 3 4 5 communication skills?The students’ average response was 3.5 to 3.9 in all four TDLC skills. They felt they performed“above average” with respect to the TDLC skills. These responses correlated with the previoussurvey. The second part of the survey was an open-ended query question, “What advice withrespect to
doctoral programs, could beaccentuated for students enrolled in a novel program and entering a field that is small andfragmented. ENE 595A faculty desired to establish a network of support for its students, wherestudents would know and support one another, develop strong relationships with engineeringeducation faculty, and be introduced to the national and international engineering educationcommunity.INTRO Course ImplementationThe course was offered in a three-hour block (with a break after 90 minutes) once per week.Typically two to three content areas or activities were planned for each class, with the faculty (allof whom attended each class) taking turns leading the discussion or learning activities. Asdepicted in Figure 1 and presented in
conversations: prompted conversations,and spontaneous conversations. The prompted conversations were initiated by the programcoordinator, who articulated a brief question or statement asking students to reflect on key aspectsof their undergraduate research experiences, including: students’ expectations and goals for participating in the program students’ goals for their research projects ways to handle research obstacles lessons students learned through research students’ future goals and plans related to research, graduate study and careers Page 23.580.4Other than posting these initial conversational prompts/questions
Engineering Technology (Weber State University) Masters in Construction Manage- ment (Purdue University)Dr. Thomas James Paskett, Weber State University Dr. Thomas J. Paskett. I have a Ph.D. in Education with an emphasis in Adult Organization and Learning from the University of Idaho. I also have a Master’s Degree in Business Administration from the Uni- versity of Phoenix. I hold a Bachelor Degree in Architectural Studies from the University of Utah. My drafting experience began with my Associate Degree in Architectural Drafting Technology from Ricks College, now Brigham Young University-Idaho. I have been designing residential buildings since 1992 and have had home plans built for the Salt Lake County Parade of Homes. It
design process, working drawings, graphical communication, and docu- mentation.Project Proposal - Student teams were asked to create a vending machine concept that improved on the state-of-the-art. Following a creative problem solving session, each team developed a decision matrix to help select their best vending machine concept. A brief development pro- posal was written to describe the physical and functional concepts as well as the project plan (i.e., team roles, Gantt chart). This assignment introduced students to project planning and gave practice in written communication.Physical Layout and Product Flow - Using I-DEAS, students modeled both internal and exter- nal features of their vending machine. Several views were created