served as Director of Research & Development for a multimedia development company and as founding Director of the Center for Integrating Research & Learning (CIRL) at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University. Under Dr. Spiegel’s leadership, the CIRL matured into a thriving Center recognized as one of the leading National Science Foundation Laboratories for activities to pro- mote science, mathematics, and technology (STEM) education. While at Florida State University, Dr. Spiegel also directed an award winning teacher enhancement program for middle grades science teachers, entitled Science For Early Adolescence Teachers (Science FEAT). His extensive background in science education
investigated uses a semester long team-based designproject to introduce students to the engineering design process. Course enrollment representsapproximately 80% of all incoming first-year engineering students (total enrollment = 660; 525identified as first-year students). Other students in the course include upper level students thattook the course out of sequence from the traditional plan of study. Due to the volume of students,the course offered two large auditorium style lecture sections and multiple (32) smallerlaboratory sections. Each week students would meet in their smaller laboratory classes,maximum of 32 students. Additionally, students were required to attend one of the two largerlectures (~350 students per lecture), each week.Students
indicating that basic microcontroller programmingknowledge would have been valuable not only for completing the projects in the introductorydesign course, but also for use in upper level engineering courses and projects of personalinterest. Not only were students eager to learn microcontroller basics, instructors also recognizedthat by introducing students to these skills, the resulting projects may be higher quality and therange of design challenges that can be assigned may be broadened.Use of microcontroller technology in freshman level courses is not new, and these concepts havebeen taught through in-person laboratory instruction with positive results at numerousuniversities [2], [3], [6]. Additionally, multiple universities have employed a
engineering.Teaching in the programs are mainly carried out as lectures, lessons, and laboratory sessions. In atypical engineering course, 30−40% of the education is carried out as lectures, 30−40% aslessons and 20−40% as laboratory experiments. In addition, case studies and project works areused in about half of the courses. Some projects are small (down to 15% of the course workload)and some may make up the whole course.In the present study, two courses are of interest. One is a course in Engineering thermodynamicswhich both the ME, DPD and IEM students take; the ME students as the very first course of theprogram, and the PDP and IEM students at the middle of the second year. The other is a bachelor(capstone) project course that the IEM students take as
senior-level laboratory and desgnsequencesIn addition to the modules described above, early-stage, functional teaming curricula (e.g., teamnorming, conflict management, effective team communication, and team roles) evolved fromconversations in the PLC. These modules were piloted in senior laboratory and design sequences(Mallette, Bothwell, & Kelly, 2018), courses that have significant team components, whereweekly- and term-projects are completed by student teams of three. The students were providedwith teaming tools and instruction to enable them to engage in successful teaming practices. Forexample, we emphasized team norming during the team formation stage, which includedconstruction of a team-generated contract specifically outlining the
/nasatlx.html. R (version 3.3.1) was used to conduct thedata analysis for the study with the integrated development environment RStudios. R is a statisticalcomputer environment and language that was developed by Bell Laboratories. It provides a largevariety of statistical and graphical capabilities and is an open sources product [14].Results and Data AnalysisThe quiz scores are shown in Table 1 and Figure 8 Table 1: Quiz Score Statistics Quiz Scores Statistics Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu Max Analytical .20 .40 .60 .6043 .80 1 Conceptual .27 .60
with a world-renowned reputation, MIThas an abundance of scientific & technological resources and engineering talents, whichprovides a core support for its technology improvement and service network. By allowingstudents to break through the established worldview and experience diverse life experiences,MIT supports students' growth and gives students a better understanding of the world andwhere they are. In the process of serving the society with technology, MIT has formed agroup of well-targeted and distinctive laboratories. The D-Lab (Development Lab), which isaimed at coping with the challenges of poverty, is a typical representative. D-Lab was founded in 2002 by Amy Smith, a senior lecturer in Mechanical Engineering.D-Lab has
courses for architecture and construction management students. Prior to joining the faculty at Cal Poly she worked in applied research at the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory in Champaign, Illinois. She is a member of the Education Committee of the ASCE Forensic Engineering Division. Her research is in the areas of engineering education, including engineering case studies in undergraduate education as well as early education to promote interest in engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Implementing Bluebeam Software in Architectural Engineering Design CoursesAbstractA critical aspect of structural
, iii) Use of video forlearning, iv) How application of Universal for Design for Learning principles and online contentmay provide greater equity and access, v) The limited understanding of imposter syndromeeffects and interventions in engineering education and the potential to improve students’self-confidence. Three case studies are presented. The first case study described the use of thetool in CS and ECE courses and analyzed which student behaviors lead to statistically-significantfavorable learning outcomes. The second case study examined the use of ClassTranscribe toaddress challenges of a Bioengineering laboratory course and student preferences for further useof ClassTranscribe-based learning in Bioengineering. The third case study
, Morgan State University Dr. Willie L Thompson, II is an Associate Professor of the Electrical and Computer Engineering De- partment within the Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. School of Engineering (SOE). Dr. Thompson serves as the Director for the Laboratory for Tactical and Communication Systems, which focuses on research for the design, implementation, and security of advanced wireless embedded systems. Dr. Thompson secured and led the SOE’s first DoD prime contract for the development of a multi-band, multi-mode software-defined radio (SDR) for next-generation DoD telemetry applications. In addition, he led the de- velopment of a NASA SDR Testbed for space communication technologies. During his industry tenure, Dr
the context of responsible laboratory behavior, and intellectual propertyrights and in the professional obligation to hold the safety and welfare of the public paramount.Teams of students are assigned dedicated space in a large laboratory shared with other teamswhere considerate and ethical behavior in this environment is stressed. One 75 minute lecturesession is typically devoted to a patent lawyer guest speaker, whose overview of intellectualproperty (IP) rights includes the ethical responsibility of honoring IP ownership. A key secondsemester engagement employs the National Institute of Engineering Ethics video, Incident atMorales, to dig deeply into the engineers’ obligations to public welfare.The engineering capstone design experience
points in database design. Database design knowledgeis technical as well as practical. Many skills are required including problem-solving, critical think-ing, creativity, communication, team working, and time management. Traditionally, expositionallectures or closed and hands-on laboratories are used to teach database design. Exams are usuallyused to evaluate knowledge and skills required in the database design process. In the rest of thisarticle, we refer to such methods as traditional methods. Unfortunately, despite their wide use,traditional methods are found to be ineffective for teaching and learning the abstract and complexdomain of database design [2, 3]. While existing teaching methods for design learning providesome clues, there is no
demonstration projects across thenation. The new projects could fully integrate research and practice, beginning with the initial phase ofproject development, and could be conceptualized as living laboratories that provide opportunities forboth researchers and practitioners (NRC, 2011, p.107).”The CRC will provide the opportunity to add to the literature concerning private and publiccollaborations about fragile communities of color and those that are socially vulnerable. How do privateand public organizations support, prepare and plan in these communities? Often underservedcommunities do not trust governmental agencies due to past social injustices, continuous inequalities,fear of governmental control, and deportation. Emergency preparedness is
excitement that a student has when they encounter more detailed instruction on similartopics in future courses.The format for Springer 1 is also unique as it is scheduled as two 2-hour laboratories but, inactuality, the length of the laboratory period is variable depending on what is being covered on aparticular day. If the material coverage is predominantly lecture-based, then the time period usedmay be as little as 50 minutes. If most of the material coverage is active project-based learningwith little instruction, then the full 2-hour period is used.The first week of the course covers the civil engineering profession and sub-disciplines, history,and societal context as well as an overview of the project. About 30 minutes is allocated
concluding activities occurredon the campus of Purdue University. The six week, on-campus portion of the program beganwith an orientation week. The orientation week included hand-on demonstrations to topics suchas electronics materials properties, global supply chains and computer assembly/disassembly,training from the libraries on how to conduct primary literature surveys, and field trips toadvanced manufacturing facilities and recycling centers. During the orientation week, teachersalso completed project specific training on laboratory methods, modeling tools, and safety, asappropriate to each research group, and discussion about teaching engineering in a service-learning context. As the program progressed, participants completed weekly
their Section 7.E (Library Services).The responses embedded in the Section 4 data indicated that outcome 3.g tended to be addressedmany times in the curriculum. Frequently, laboratory courses (where students typically writereports) were identified as such courses, as well as technical writing courses, often offered in anEnglish department, technical drawing courses, and design courses. The broad scope of 3.g,including written, oral, graphical communication and ability to identify and use appropriateliterature means that any time students are writing or giving presentations as part of a course, itmight be counted as addressing that outcome. One institution even re-defined 3.g to be only“ability to communicate effectively through written, oral
, which heldundergraduate research positions, expressed greater confidence in research and professionalabilities, 88% reported significant growth in structuring and conducting a research project, and73% attested awareness of a graduate school environment [2], [3], [7]. According to Hurtado et al.[1], these undergraduate research opportunities have further facilitated the decision of pursuingSTEM careers and Ph.D. studies post-graduation [5].However, experiencing success, such as procuring an internship position, joining an undergraduateresearch laboratory, or being able to attend graduate school, highly depends on maintaining acompetitive grade-point average (GPA). Grades in higher education are of great value since theyinfluence multiple
Paper ID #28572How Extra Credit Quizzes and Test Corrections Improve Student LearningWhile Reducing StressDr. Brian Scott Rice, Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Brian S. Rice is an assistant professor in the Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering Technology Department at Rochester Institute of Technology since 2016. He joined the RIT faculty after spending over 25 years in applied research while working at University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Ener- getics, Lockheed Martin Corporation, and Eastman Kodak Company. Areas of applied research include system dynamics and controls, solid mechanics, heat transfer, and
, studentclub meetings, departmental or college guest lecture series, departmental information sessions,and meetings with individual faculty members. For those students specifically interested in CE orEVEG, the following additional major exploration opportunities were created for all studentsenrolled in the Fall semester course: (1) guided construction site tours of a large campus project,(2) CE/EVEG major information session, (3) faculty and student departmental picnic, (4) guidedtours of academic and research laboratories, and (5) lunches between small groups of FYEstudents and individual CE/EVEG faculty members. Table 1 provides a summary of these majorexploration opportunities. For each event, sign-in sheets were used to track student
institutions cater theirtraining to specific populations, use qualified, in-person trainers, and instruct participants how tointervene. These recommendations motivated a chemical engineering department at a technicalinstitute to develop a custom in-person training program in collaboration with the Title IX andBias Response (T9BR) and the Violence Prevention and Response (VPR) offices.The in-person trainings, entitled “Promoting a Professional and Inclusive Lab Culture,” weremandatory for all laboratory groups in the department, including faculty, staff, and trainees. Topromote discussion and interaction within the context of individual lab cultures, training sessionswere small (~20 participants) and grouped lab members together. The trainings were
would be “incredibly helpful”.AE scholars also use a wide variety of tools and platforms for sharing research data. Manyfaculty think of the published thesis or journal article as the public sharing of data. However,internally, data is shared through local tools like emails and shared laboratory disc drives. Datathat is not sensitive is shared through document sharing platforms like Microsoft OneDrive,Dropbox, and Google Drive. Services like QNAP's Network Attached Storage (NAS) are alsoused for backup, storage, and transferring large data. Although sharing data internally wasgenerally not considered a challenge by most respondents, getting large amounts of simulationdata from one place to another was a problem. At least one faculty member
Curriculum Study (BSCS). Dr. Spiegel also served as Director of Research & Development for a multimedia development company and as founding Director of the Center for Integrating Research & Learning (CIRL) at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University. Under Dr. Spiegel’s leadership, the CIRL matured into a thriving Center recognized as one of the leading National Science Foundation Laboratories for activities to pro- mote science, mathematics, and technology (STEM) education. While at Florida State University, Dr. Spiegel also directed an award winning teacher enhancement program for middle grades science teachers, entitled Science For Early Adolescence Teachers (Science FEAT). His
recognized excellence in the academic community. ‚ The history of these institutions generally indicates that they earned their reputations for educating engineers at the undergraduate level; research emphasis ordinarily came later as the programs developed, and as scientific and technological advances dictated the need for more research within the academic community. ‚ Comprehensive doctoral programs usually have considerably larger and more comprehensive laboratory facilities. ‚ Many of comprehensive doctoral programs actively engage undergraduates involvement in research ‚ Undergraduate class sections at comprehensive doctoral institutions tend to be larger. The
. Therefore, students not only learned about the requirements for their homedesigns, but they also got an insight of things to consider when implementing certainaspects of their design. For example, students were warned not to put technologicalsystems in their homes that would frequently break and would be high in maintenancecosts because this would be an expense that home owners could not handle.Professor Jeff Haberl from the Energy Systems Laboratory [4] within the Department ofArchitecture at Texas A&M University and PhD student, Mini Malhotra, spoke to thestudents about past and current projects between the College of Architecture and Habitatfor Humanity. Both speakers were able to summarize past research and give feasibleideas to implement
large course project. Limiting thespace and time to convey ideas has the added benefit of focusing student attention on theimportant technical objectives of a laboratory exercise. After implementing thisinstructional model, the faculty have observed a rise in the quality of written, oral,graphical and technical work. Furthermore, end of course evaluations indicate thatstudents understand how the sequence of short assignments develop technicalcommunication skills. Page 12.331.2 Building Engineering Communication Skills 2IntroductionAll too often the authors’ have received reports that are 30 pages long with
optimization. He has consulted for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wimpey Offshore Ltd., and Argonne National Laboratory. Address: Department of Civil Engineering, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL 62026; telephone: 618-650-2815; e-mail: mrossow@siue.edu. Page 13.844.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Learning Statics by Studying Worked ExamplesIntroductionThe traditional way to learn in a problem-solving course such as statics is to solve a largenumber of homework problems. This approach is often inefficient and frustrating becausestudents spend so much time
). Page 13.1095.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Statics and Dynamics Projects Emphasizing Introductory Design and ManufacturingAbstractThis paper describes in detail 4 major projects undertaken by mechanical engineering students inan abbreviated laboratory (lab) component of a combined statics and dynamics course, oftentaken by sophomores. For each of the projects, there was a significant analysis, design,manufacture, and testing aspect with significant interdependent synergy. Specific requirementswere provided and the projects were essentially fun-spirited design contests with either aperformance index or a class vote determining the best overall project. Two projects were in
(6), 356-361. [3] Koszalka, T. (2002). Technology resources as a mediating factor in career interest development. Educational Technology and Society, 5(2), 29. [4] Ogot, M., & Kremer, G. (2006). Developing a framework for Disassemble/Analyze/Assemble (DAA) activities in engineering education. Chicago, IL. [5] Donovan, E. (1982). The influence of the eighth grade science teacher's gender, classroom laboratory emphasis, level of understanding of science and career interest on eighth grade girls' science and engineering career interests. Florida Institute of Technology, University Microfilms International. [6] Sheppard, S. D., 1992, "Mechanical Dissection: An Experience in How Things Work," Proceedings of the
2003. She has been a research associate in the Laboratory for Responsible Manufacturing (LRM) at Northeastern University since September 1999. She has also been employed as an Assistant Professor by Yildiz Technical University till February 2006. Dr. Kongar is currently an Assistant Professor at Bridgeport University and a Part-Time Researcher in the Center for Industrial Ecology at Yale University. Her research interests include the areas of supply chain management, logistics, environmentally conscious manufacturing, product recovery, disassembly systems, production planning and scheduling and multiple criteria decision making. She has co-authored several technical
economic development, but alsowith respect to quality of life as it pertains to conditions that promote sustainable humanprosperity and growth (e.g. opportunity, economy, privacy, community, education, andhealth). In August 2008, James Madison University (JMU) will enroll its first engineeringstudents into a unique engineering product and process design program focused onsustainable societies. A significant component of this integrated program is the sixsemester 10-credit design laboratory sequence that stretches from the sophomore year tograduation. We present a divergence from the generally accepted approach tosustainability (normally referred to as “sustainable engineering” or “environmentalsustainability”) and include instruction in