to gainexperience ordering parts from various suppliers discussed in the class. Overall, they felt moreconfident going in to senior design. Since some of the students in the class were also involved instudent organization activities such as the student chapter of the Institute of Electrical andElectronics Engineers (IEEE), the class gave those students the tools needed to work onprototyping designs for group projects.The plans for modifications during future offerings of the course include the potentialincorporation of a second software tool such as EAGLE. Once the basic design principles arecovered, the plan is to have students design the same board using two different software: Onewith KiCAD and one with EAGLE (or another tool). This is
understandingof what design entails and how to translate this propositional knowledge into practice. As aresult, students in the teachers’ classrooms learned how to engage in engineering practices,gradually developing knowledge of how to identify essential features of a design problem, gatherinformation that informs the problem, plan, construct, test, evaluate, and optimize a designsolution. In this manner, teachers and students, over time, became active, legitimate participantsof the community of practice, generating new knowledge of both science and engineering coreideas, crosscutting concepts, and related skills.Context of the StudyThe context of this study was a large, multi-year university school partnership that included theparticipation of over
shown to increase the fun elements and also acts as a motivation factor forstudents to become more active in learning. In future, we plan to conduct systematic literaturereview on the effect of gamification beyond just CS/SE by expanding it to STEM baseddiscipline. Additionally, we plan to continually improve the design and usability of SEP-CyLEby using most influential game elements. While there are some studies underway, we plan toreport the results and conduct additional studies guided to builder a larger body of evidence onusefulness of gamification in CS/SE education.7. Acknowledgements:This work is supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grants DUE-1225742and DUE-1525112. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or
abid for a souvenir supply contract with the university. Just like with most project-based learningmodules (PBLs), following was the hook statement – “Your university is planning to celebrateits 150 years of existence in few years. They are planning to sell souvenirs to market the brandand cover the cost of celebrations. Your startup company is bidding for the supply contract.”Student groups were required to select materials and manufacturing process for those articles. Inaddition, they were to compare the selected manufacturing process with other manufacturingprocess. Student teams were required to meet with the customer to find out type and number ofsouvenirs required. The customer in this case was instructor. Deliverables included
. After incorporation ofthe course modifications that have been identified by following the methodology, studentsatisfaction evaluation scores doubled.IntroductionIn established courses in long-running programs, courses may be stable for a long time, whichcan produce to consistency, but also may lead to staleness of the educational delivery.Community colleges are often more prescriptive where the outcomes and lesson plans aresupplied to the instructor by the administration. At a typical four-year university there is agreater level of academic freedom to innovate courses and bring in new material. This can leadto content drift. There are, however, collegiate programs that have regulatory constraints. Thisarticle seeks to document a process to
Paper ID #21075A Hands-on Project for Avionics Systems Course in Aviation EngineeringTechnology ProgramDr. Chenyu Huang, Purdue University Chenyu Huang is currently a Post-doc Researcher in the School of Aviation and Transportation Technol- ogy at Purdue University with a demonstrated history of working in the higher education industry. He has a Bachelor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering, Masters’ Degrees in Air Traffic Planning and Management, and Aerospace and Aviation Management, Ph.D. degree focused on Aviation Data Analytics, Avionics, and Aviation Safety Support Systems from Purdue University. Chenyu is an FAA
the same as the previous “Return” buttons.After reviewing above tabs, students have learned construction information of a sluice gate fromperspective of construction materials, masonry work, earthwork and foundation. In the followingtabs, students will experience the construction process of a sluice gate by virtually building asluice gate by themselves. The Construction Process Simulation tab is unique to the previoustabs. There are seven sub-tabs under this tab, which are Start, Construction Plan, Foundation,Bottom Layer, Middle Layer, Top Layer, and Finish, working as a step-to-step process to build asluice gate. Figure 8 shows the Start tab and Construction Plan tab. Figure 8: MUSSN Construction Process Simulation Tab and Construction Plan
channels if one channel is not enough, etc. High level detail of the differences between QAM (single tone), CDMA and OFDM technologies covered providing students with pros and cons of each technology when applied to specific issuesBasic RF planning over wireless channels Teaches students what power levels based onmost pertinent to IoT required error rates are required to plan for a(ABET: a, c, e) successful wireless
assessment, and predictive modeling & machine learning. For more information, please visit his personal blog at https://gokhanegilmez.wordpress.com/Dr. Dusan Sormaz, Ohio University Dr. Dusan N. Sormaz is a Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Ohio University, Athens, USA. Dr. Dusan N. Sormaz’s principal research interests are in Lean manufacturing, Simulation, Addi- tive Manufacturing, Process planning, and application of knowledge-based systems in manufacturing. He teaches Lean manufacturing, Simulation and Computer Integrated Manufacturing courses at Ohio Uni- versity. His student team recently received the 1st place among 220 teams from 11 countries in the Global simulation competition sponsored by
practicingengineer is the design of infrastructure, devices or systems. Civil and environmental engineershold the majority of all professional engineering licenses [2]. In the civil and environmentalengineering professions, practitioners deliver plans and recommendations for theirimplementation. Every day, the public drives on these roads and bridges; lives, goes to school andworks in these structures; and relies on safe drinking water and proper wastewater treatment.According to the NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers, “Engineering has a direct and vital impacton the quality of life for all people” [4]. As such, practicing engineers have an incredibleresponsibility to “Hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public” [6]. Licensure ofthe
Paper ID #22141What is Engineering Leadership? A Proposed DefinitionRobyn Paul, University of Calgary Robyn Paul is the Program Evaluation and Planning Specialist in the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary. She is responsible for supporting the decision-making and reporting needs of SSE, particularly those related to accreditation and the teaching and learning processes. Robyn is also finishing up her master’s thesis in engineering education where she is looking at the impact of engineering leadership development on career success.Dr. Arindom Sen, University of Calgary Dr. Sen is the Associate
comment classifications and student performance in the studiedintroductory course and plan to track student success through subsequent programming coursesas well. As we begin to look at student performance, we are utilizing McGill and Volet’sconceptual framework for analyzing student programs and diagnosing deficiencies [20]. Thisframework links three types of programming knowledge (syntactic, conceptual, and strategic)with the view of knowledge from cognitive psychology (declarative, procedural, andconditional). We believe using this framework to link our qualitative codebook withprogramming knowledge will allow us to further evaluate students’ thinking processes and thechanges in programming knowledge over time. Furthermore, in addition to
engineering design process [3], [4], [5] and how it maps with the RCV development project; • Demonstration track for the RCVs to run o A streamlined method that would enable 45-88 student groups to demonstrate their RCV design project at the end of the semester. o A plan to house the track within the existing Makerspace facility without taking up an “unreasonable” amount of space. • Rules for RCV demonstrations; • Grading rubrics for each of the deliverables as they pertain to each unique engineering discipline; • Methods for incorporating soft skills (i.e., project management, oral communication, documentation development, portfolio development); • Ethics studies
presentations using teleconferencing technologies with remote sites for both faculty and students. ● The laboratory environment utilizes virtual machines for the PC interface students use to monitor and configure the PLCs. This reduces cost by minimizing the hardware required.Conversely the design, acquisition, and implementation of the lab environment also presentedchallenges: ● Cost: The laboratory access and scheduling hardware and software cost was approximately $9995.00 with a $2,995.00 yearly license. Additionally, each pod cost was approximately $23,358 and control plane infrastructure to support four lab pods was $7178.00 with plans to scale the infrastructure to 24 lab pods total. ● Labor: After design, the
members in this work that was attached to a grade.discussion had different solutions. 2.4 Recommendations for future study Bearing in mind the observations and shortcomings of the interventions we plan to augment our interventions by ensuring the drawbacks observed were addressed. One recommendation is to have icebreaking games at the beginning to make the group
contingencies required to meet deadlines. These two cases areshown in Table 2. Table 2. Alternative Project Management Examples Textbook Case Authentic Case 1 Problem Definition Procure ingots for given metallurgy 2 System Analysis Develop weld procedure 3 Design Input & Output Extrude 30’ lengths 4 Design Database Pull bore and hone ID for tubing 5 Develop Input Screen Turn OD and shape tapered stress joint 6 Develop Output Screen Weld 150’ lengths 7 Develop Database Inspect 8 Test System Shipping with contingency plan (Houston to Europe) 9 Implement System
World Council on System Engineering and Information Technology (WCSEIT), Vice President of Safety Health and Envi- ronment Research Organization (SHERO) and Vice President of World Council on Communication and Arts (WCCA). He is Chairman of Working Group ”Ingenieurp¨adagogik im Internationalen Kontext” since 2002, Member of International Monitoring Committee in IGIP since 2004, Member of Strategic Plan- ning Committee of Education Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc (IEEE- EdSoc) since 2009, Board Member of ”Global Council on Manufacturing and Management” (GCMM) since 2004 and Director of Brazilian Network of Engineering (RBE) since 1998. He is also Member of Board of Governors
fluency, design fluency, cognitiveflexibility (the mental ability to think about multiple concepts), planning, response inhibition,handling novel situations, working memory, reasoning, problem solving, and abstract thinking(Alvarez, Emory and Emory 2006; Lezak, Howieson, and Loring, 2004; Monsell, 2003). Normanand Shallice (1980) outline five types of situations where routine activation of behavior wouldnot be sufficient for optimal performance: 1. Those that involve planning or decision making 2. Those that involve error correction or troubleshooting 3. Situations where responses are not well-rehearsed or contain novel sequences of actions 4. Dangerous or technically difficult situations 5. Situations that
(SDSU). The case study presented in this paper demonstrates howapplication of engineering management and quality improvement tools, such as Kaizen and Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, along with an enhanced approach to our commonly used teachingobservation process contributed to improved instructor’s outcomes.Formative versus Summative Teaching ObservationObservations of teaching can take the form of summative or formative evaluation, which servedifferent purposes for the faculty member being observed. The Iowa State Center for Excellencein Learning and Teaching2 has published a literature review, and statement of best practices, insummative peer evaluation of teaching, that is, where that evaluation plays a role in personneldecisions such as
courses they should take before transferringto Seattle University.We participate in many recruitment activities. We visit community colleges and present aboutour scholarly interests, give students an overview of electrical and computer engineering, andprovide details about our program. Participation in such recruitment activities is essentialbecause many potential transfer students are not even aware that Seattle University offers aprogram in ECE.Potential transfer students are encouraged to meet with the department chair long before theyapply for transfer. They are advised on what courses they should take in their last year beforetransfer. Their transcripts are evaluated by the chair and they are given a draft plan of studies sothey know how
perceived divisions between STEM andthe liberal arts by linking those perspectives and assignments to broader habits of mind that arenecessary for engineers and designers. We then describe our strategies for integrating a richdesign experience into the course and consider how that integration alters typical approaches todesign projects. Finally, we discuss our plan to implement assessments that account for bothstudents’ technical abilities and their application of course theories and concepts.Course development was supported at the Institution by a summer course development grant thatencouraged faculty to partner across disciplines to create unique course offerings. Thepartnership between the Humanities & Social Sciences (HSS) and the
experience of teaching it for the first time during the 2017-2018 academic year, and plans for the future.IntroductionIn 1997, ABET rolled out the Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000), which introduced for the firsttime an understanding of social context as a requirement for engineering education. This is anacknowledgement that engineering practice does not occur in a vacuum, but must be responsiveto the various economic, political, and cultural forces around it. In the years since EC2000,many engineering programs have struggled to meet this criteria in a meaningful way [1]. Thereasons are primarily two-fold. First, the addition of so-called “soft skills” into the curriculum inno way reduces the amount of technical content that is also necessary to
productive.In addition, part of this program must include appropriate training and support for those who arementoring the students. Assessments need to continually redefine desired outcomes and goals ofsuch programs.Another shortcoming was that the program gave students and faculty a stipend, but it did notprovide any research related expenses. This is potentially limiting for some projects if faculty donot plan for student researchers far enough in advance.Changes that will be made for the upcoming summer program will include faculty sessions toprovide structure and methods for appropriate mentoring. In addition, SURE students will bepaired with a faculty member who is not a part of the research project, serving as a role modeland guide for
ensure that all students attain marketable skills as part of theirhigher education. 60x30TX is a statewide plan developed by the THECB to enhance theworkforce of the state through higher education. As stated in the introduction to the plan: “Texas has become increasingly engaged in a global economy dependent on skilled and knowledgeable workers. Most of those workers come from higher education. Although Texas is improving at increasing college completions for students from groups that traditionally have not earned certificates or degrees in large numbers, the state has not improved quickly or broadly enough to keep up with the changes in demographics. Completions in Higher education must
collaborative project. 5. Apply common workplace practices, tools and software in a semester long team project, including: project planning tools, team management tools, tools to generate solution alternatives, decision analysis methods, risk analysis methods, and value proposition analysis / baseline comparison. 6. Communicate, pitch, and justify your design decisions in a variety of formats. 7. Use field sketching to communicate ideas visually to colleagues and stakeholders and to develop ideas through iteration. 8. Use standardized engineering graphics conventions as applied to technical sketching and computer-aided design/solid modeling software to communicate formalized design ideas.Students are divided into 5
Paper ID #27399Engineering Graduate Students’ Salient Identities as Predictors of PerceivedTask DifficultyMr. Derrick James Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno Derrick Satterfield is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education and Chemical Engineering at the Uni- versity of Nevada, Reno. He graduated from the University of Nevada, Reno in May 2017, and plans to pursue a career in academia in the future. His research interests are in graduate student attrition rates within academia, engineering identity development and the factors that influence decision making on persistence.Ms. Marissa A. Tsugawa, University of Nevada
Idea Generation Workshop Dissecting Student Entrepreneurial Technology Impact of Simulation in Manufacturing and Startups - Triumphs and Agonies Prototyping Opportunity Assessment Opportunity Assessment Business Model Generation and Hypothesis Business Model Generation and Hypothesis Testing Testing Intellectual Property (IP) and Start-up Legal Intellectual Property (IP) and Start-up Legal Structures Structures Market Size Analysis, Value Proposition, and Market Size Analysis, Value Proposition, and Elevator Pitch Elevator Pitch Components of Business Plan & Incubator Visit
automation and the Internet of Things (IoT) are explored. Data were collected atfour different summer camps. In a three year long and NSF funded project, a researchteam of engineers and learning scientists designed four summer camps for middle gradestudents and implemented them in two different cities in Texas. At these camps, that eachlasted one week, students planned, designed, and established a “Smart Home” by using3D printers, computer-aided design (CAD) tools, and the IoT technologies. Parents wereinvolved in the summer camp activities at different occasions. For example, parentsbrainstormed with their children and conducted research with them to complete the take-home assignments on engineering concepts and cutting edge technologies
offering graduate school research experience, improving students’ academicperformance and confidence, and having a lasting impact on their career paths2. Hirsch et al.suggested that their REU program could provide preparing undergraduates to be more capablemembers of their profession3. Further, it was found that most participants in a summer researchprogram in electrical engineering for minorities at Georgia Tech were either enrolled in graduateschool or were planning to enroll within the next two years4.Sores stated that Florida A&M University senior design projects used C-Stamp microcontrollersrather than topic-specific microcontroller for robot design. He also stated that C-Stampmicrocontrollers are more student-friendly and allowed
nearly quadrupled from its fall 1993 enrollment of 10,500. UVU isnow the largest bachelor-degree granting institution in the state. While this institutional transitionhas been the result of much strategic planning, it has strained state and community resources andcontinues to create a number of challenges, particularly in the availability of scholarship funds.UVU has a dual mission – that of a comprehensive university offering bachelor’s degrees and afew master’s degrees, and that of a community college offering associate degrees andcertificates. As part of its community college mission, the institution maintains an open-enrollment policy. Student demographics are similar to those of a community college, withmany students seeking a “second