that produces the interrupts required fortiming and running your model, either on our hardware target or on a simulator 8. Figure 2. Student experiment on the lab Page 12.943.43. Lab ContentsWeekly laboratory assignments are provided enhancement on Discrete time signal and systemlab. A brief description of the some topics covered and the use of exercises are given below.3.1 Analog/Digital ConversionIn many continuous time signal applications, it is getting more attractive to convert a continuous-time signal into a digital-time signal. Sampling and quantization determine the accuracy of thedigital signal. The ideal
facilities. Johnson etal.[5] describe lean laboratory exercises that combine two methods of discovery-based learning:learning by exploring and simulation-based learning, based on a physical simulation of a clockassembly. Other games available to highlight important points in lean manufacturing include:airplane manufacturing exercises (Billington[1]), the Lean Leap Logistics game (Holweg andBicheno[4]), classroom simulations (Prusak[7], Verma[9], or production projects simulating anassembly production environment (Blust and Bates[2]).Simulations can significantly increase students knowledge on lean, as Verma et al.[9] proves itusing pre- and post-simulation surveys. A common important point for these games is, asChaneski3 emphasizes when describing a
experiment is carried out in a non-adiabaticsystem to allow a greater insight in this experiment and to enhance its pedagogical value. Thisexperimental system has been developed for an undergraduate laboratory in thermodynamics forMechanical/Chemical Engineering students.IntroductionThe heat of combustion1 of a fuel is the amount of heat generated by the complete combustionof a unit weight of fuel and it is expressed in Joules/kg (or other similar units such as BTU/Ib orcalories/gram). It is experimentally determined by combustion of an accurately weighed sampleof fuel in a calorimeter and measurement of the heat released. In this experimental system, anOxygen Bomb Calorimeter2 has been used. The temperature rise, T, resulting from the heatreleased
farmers in a Village in Africa. Students weregiven two laboratory sessions (4 hours), over 2-5 days to complete the project and encouraged toresearch the environmental, social, and cultural characteristics of the region which their groupwas assigned (eg. Ghana, Zimbawae, Burkina Faso).Food for thoughtThroughout the entire “Food For Thought” project students were utilizing all the fundamentals ofengineering design (Conceptualization, Evaluation, Testing, and Redesign). This project provedto be extremely challenging for students given the time allotted for the project (8 hrs, over 4 lab Page 12.437.4sessions).This project was created by building
designs from different groups into more complex systems. After students havelearned the design process in class, they repeat the process in their collaborative term project,typically an arithmetic logic unit (ALU) designed using different modeling techniques.3) CPBL implementation in Microcomputer Programming (EE345)Due to the promising implementation results of CPBL in EE442 and EE347, we began to use itin EE345 staring from Fall 2006. Assembly language programming and microcontrollerinterfacing are often taught with a lab component or at least TA office hours. In lieu of those, wecan integrate simple hands-on exploratory and development projects into the lecture. Years ago,our microcomputer programming course was taught in a laboratory with
? Page 12.712.7 Figure 2. Advanced Scientific Process and Application Skills For the morning session of the second workshop day, the teachers were divided into twogroups. One group went to the Auburn University Solar House shown in Figure 3. This housewas constructed for the 2002 Solar Decathlon competition held in Washington D.C. by the USDepartment of Energy. The operation of the electrical system in the solar house was describedand related to the ideas and concepts presented on the first day of the workshop. The solar housewas utilized as a platform to discuss energy efficiency in the design and construction ofresidential dwellings. A second group convened in a computer laboratory to discuss weatherdata. A real-time
Innovation Laboratory where students involved inindustry sponsored projects and entrepreneurial projects will develop and prototype theirinventions.Program Evaluation PlanTo assess the success of the proposed project, the team has devised a comprehensiveassessment and program evaluation plan that includes periodic collection of quantitativeand qualitative data. The evaluation plan consists of two primary components; 1) overallevaluation of the program and individual program components by various constituents(students, faculty, alumni, and industry), and 2) assessment of student learning andgraduate capability to perform published program learning outcomes.Program EvaluationThe proposed program has five goals for enacting our vision for
AC 2007-502: USING THE SENIOR DESIGN JURY TO DIRECTLY ASSESSPROGRAM OUTCOMESMichael Bronzini, George Mason University Michael S. Bronzini currently holds the Dewberry Chair in Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering (CEIE) in the Volgenau School of Information Technology and Engineering at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, and is also the Chair of the CEIE Department. Prior positions include Director of the Center for Transportation Analysis at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Chair of the Department of Civil Engineering at Penn State University, and Director of the Transportation Center and Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Tennessee. Dr
cost estimation and related topics at Universities such as UCLA, Caltech, Page 12.411.5University of California at Riverside, and the University of Wisconsin at Madison. These shortcourses have also been presented at over 25 companies, national laboratories, and governmentagencies. Many of these engineers and managers have strongly felt this topic should be introducedinto the engineering undergraduate curriculum. To prepare our graduates at Harvey MuddCollege for the challenges they will be facing in their careers in the complex global economy, wehave introduced an elective course on cost estimation for our engineering majors. This
homework seems toincorporate that principle in a manner agreeable to both students and faculty.References 1. A.W. Chickering and Z.F. Gamson, “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education,” American Ass. For Higher Education Bulletin, 29 (1987), 3-7. 2. E. F. Redish, J. M. Saul, and R. N. Steinberg, "On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer- based laboratories”, American Journal Physics, 65 (1997), 45-54. 3. McGraw Hill Homework Manager home page. 4. Wiley Higher Education home page (link to Technology Solutions and Wiley Plus). 5. A. Bright, R. Wang, E102 Advanced Systems Engineering syllabus home page. Harvey Mudd College. 6. S. Servetto, ECE 562, Fundamental
materials so the students can explorethe subjects further with reading. Second, demonstration or hands-on laboratory of FRPmachining processes would give the students better insight on the subject. Third, a newcourse assessment can be taken to allow the students to make comments on specificcourse topics.4. SummaryMachining of FRP composites is one of the most difficult and least understood areas inmanufacturing technology. Thus, it is necessary to include machining and tool regimes ofFRP composites into the manufacturing curricula, especially at the schools in the regionsof the country where major aerospace industry exist. The Machine ManufacturingProgram at Portland Community College offers the machine tool course with FRPcomposite machining
Engineering from the University of Cincinnati, with specialization in human factors engineering. Dr. Pennathur's interests are in the science of learning in engineering education. Dr. Pennathur has considerable expertise in human behavioral research methods. He has developed human behavior and performance models in personnel skills and training for advanced electromechanical troubleshooting and fault-finding tasks, disability models in older adults (work funded by NIH), and modeling physical and mental workload for soldier safety and performance (work funded by the US Army Research Laboratory jointly with Fort Bliss and William Beaumont Army Medical Center). These projects have all included extensive
supply chain is determined by the system integrators. The delivery consortium hasfive major companies in that category so our solution is a serious top-down attempt totackle root-cause features and allow the benefits to flow to the wider economy.Process to collect informationHighly networked systems pose a significant educational challenge. The basic conceptsof systems design are taught in most engineering programs. However, the operationalknow-how to create and sustain the large complex systems that are our concern onlyexists in the business world. The scale and concentration of resources are far beyond thecapabilities of any university. The laboratory to study next-generation systemcharacteristics therefore has to be within the industry sector
betterunderstanding of the teaching pedagogy which includes multi-disciplinary teaching andintegrated lecture laboratory of the U.A. Whitaker School of Engineering at FGCU. While ourprimary focus was on student learning, we also conducted surveys to understand the student’sperspective of the WSOE teaching approach. We also had the opportunity to workcollaboratively and learn from other faculty’s teaching style. Although our teaching willincrease, the information gathered through development and teaching of this course will impactour future classes and our engineering career thereafter.ServicesGiven our nascent program, it is not surprising that there is currently only a small number offaculty in the U.A. Whitaker School of Engineering with 8 total faculty
Michael G. Jenkins is chair and professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of Detroit Mercy where is specializes in materials, mechanics of materials, machine design and reliability/probability. He has been involved in pedagogy in higher education for the past 15 years and test engineering and R&D activities for the past 25 years. His post PhD positions include 12 years at University of Washington in Seattle, 5 years at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and 1 year as a postdoctoral invited researcher at the University of Tokyo. Prior to his PhD he worked at PACCAR Technical Center for 2.5 years. He has authored or co-authored over 75 archival publications, over 100 proceedings
and projects. It wasdeveloped to allow students to survey the various engineering disciplines without great depthin any specific discipline. Goals of the course included learning design strategies and conceptswhile encouraging teamwork. The course consists of lectures (1hr/wk ), laboratory work Page 12.765.2(3hrs/wk ) and recitations (2hrs/wk ) for an academic semester. Course evaluation survey results clearly indicate that students prefer a competition labover a conventional lab. We believe the spirit of competition and the extra credit incentivesprovided a reward for the student teams’ efforts and encouraged learning. After the
associate professor (1979-87); Tuskegee University as assistant professor of mechanical engineering (1976-78), and Jackson Engineering Graduate Program as adjunct faculty (1975-76). Over the period 1980-85, he was employed in summers and academic years at Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) of California Institute of Technology and IBM. He worked in HVAC industry with B&B Consulting Engineers (1975-76). He earned his B.E. (Mechanical) degree from Sardar Patel University in India in 1970. Upon immigrating to USA, he earned his M.S. (1972) and his Ph.D. (1975), both in Mechanical Engineering from Mississippi State University. His specialty areas of interest include renewable energy, biomedical
., 2000, A multidisciplinary team project for electrical engineering, computer engineering, and computer science majors.8) Brockman, J., Batill, S., Renaud, J., Kantor, J., Kirkner, D., Kogge, P., and Stevenson, R., 1996, "Development of a multidisciplinary engineering design laboratory at the University of Notre Dame." Proc. of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.9) Otto, K., Bezdek, J., Wood, K., Jensen, D., and Murphy, M., 1998, "Building better mousetrap builders: Courses to incrementally and systematically teach design," Proc. of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.10) Garcia, M.A., and Patterson-McNeill, H., 2002, "Learn how to develop software using the toy Lego
theoretical background and system developmentmethodology used in development. Additionally an overview of the system is presentedfollowed by lessons learned from these efforts. By providing this information the authorshope to encourage the innovative application of IT in Capstone programs at otheruniversities.Background: Project OverviewThe Auburn Engineering Technical Assistance Program (ATAP) has used their fundingfrom the National Science Foundation (ENG#0332594) to marshal the diverse resourcesand interests of different (a) units of a state cooperative extension system, (b)departments of an academic institution, (c) research laboratories, (d) industrialdevelopment units of private corporations and government, and (e) manufacturingcompanies. The
, Page 12.1092.2based on a combination of the two aforementioned introductory engineering courses. Thisrecruitment effort was in its earliest formative stages in late fall 2001. The course, led by Goffand Gregg, was envisioned as an intensive, hands-on, four credit hour class combining twoweeks of classroom and laboratory work on the Virginia Tech campus with an equal duration atthe University’s Center for European Studies and Architecture (CESA) facility in Riva SanVitale, Switzerland. Teamwork issues associated with this venture were ad hoc. Academicissues were dealt with by the authors Goff and Gregg; however the difficulties of itinerary andlogistics were handled by a senior staff member from the Dean’s Office. This course
achievement levels. However, the results of theassessment tools identified areas which might benefit from improvement. Based on thisassessment, recommendations are made for the purpose of continuous improvement. This paperprovides information on the Program Outcomes assessment process issues and challenges and willbe of benefit to engineering technology programs seeking accreditation or re-accreditation.1. IntroductionThe curriculum of the Electrical Engineering Technology program covers a broad basededucational experience that emphasizes practical, hands-on laboratory work, closely coordinatedwith theoretical classroom discussion. Students receive a solid foundation of coursework inelectric circuits, digital electronics, solid-state electronics
/ trusses, machines Iowa State Statics http://bits.me.berkeley.edu/cw/00/02/36/1/static.exe Authorware John Hopkins Truss designer Web-based software http://www.jhu.edu/~virtlab/bridge/truss.htm Engineering Mechanics Statics & dynamics Missouri- http://web.umr.edu/~oci/index.html Rolla MecMovies - Mechanics of Materials Basics to combined stress states http://web.umr.edu/~mecmovie/index.html Missouri Virtual Laboratory for Structural Mechanics State http://www.ae.msstate.edu/vlsm/ Engineering Mechanics of Solids MIT
of hand tools, manually-operated machine tools,and CNC machines. An adjacent instructional welding laboratory provides metal joiningcapability. Access to these facilities was granted to the student SAE groups forfabrication, but finding a suitable location for the large frame jig and the long-termassembly process was not an easy matter. After several false starts in various locationsthroughout the engineering complex at MSU, it came down to intervention by the facultyadvisor and ‘squatter’s rights’ to claim and maintain sufficient floor space in the weldinglab. The facilities and space concerns added even more realism to the project as studentsrealized that they were not the only game in town.Educational Component and OutcomesFrom the
Applications in Engineering Education, v 11, n 2, 2003, p 75-82.[3] Haque M., “Interactive animation and visualization in a virtual soil mechanics laboratory,” Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual, Volume 1, 10-13 Oct. 2001, p TIC - 5-9 vol.1.[4] Harada Y., “Development of courseware for introduction of nonlinear frame analysis using free scientific software package,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, v 12, n 4, 2004, p 224- 231.[5] Lau H., Mak K., “The virtual company: A re-configurable open shell for problem-based learning in industrial engineering,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, v 47, n 2-3, November, 2004, p 289- 312.[6] de Coulon F., Forte E., Rivera J., “KIRCHHOFF: an educational
Laboratory (see subject’s wrist)Student Questionnaire Responses The students who participated in the program were given a short questionnaire atthe beginning of the program to assess their level of education and experience and todetermine their reasons for participating in the program. Of the seven students whoattended high school in the US and did not have any engineering courses at Texas Tech,four had completed calculus in high school, two were on track to complete calculus intheir senior year, one completed pre-calculus, and three had some experience inprogramming C++. When asked what attracted them to engineering, students typically Page
Page 13.1082.2organization would not be competitive. Dupont realized that they must optimize both customerand stakeholder value and Six Sigma evolved to what is known as the Third Generation. Animportant part of Six Sigma Generation III, was tying Six Sigma projects to the organization’sstrategic objectives.While working with industry, it is clear that many know Six Sigma simply as a quality programand think that it is nothing new. It is true that many of the tools in the Six Sigma toolkit can betraced back to AT&T Bell Laboratories in the 1920’s where Shewhart introduced his revolutionson variation. Components from Deming, Juran, Feigenbaum and others are prevalent throughoutSix Sigma as well. However, Six Sigma has evolved far beyond a
, government, and national laboratories is a must. The proposal solicitation lists the following stated activities and specific areas of interest: “The extent of integration of sustainability into the engineering curricula at institutions of higher education in the United States may be identified by several key activities and indicators including but not limited to: (1) curricula development activities such as new core courses or electives or amending existing courses to include sustainability themes; (2) centers and institutes on campus related to sustainability; (3) conferences related to sustainability developed and hosted by faculty, departments, or engineering schools; (4) institutional support and funding for research relating engineering
AC 2008-1509: KINESTHETIC STRUCTURESKevin Dong, California Polytechnic State University Page 13.830.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Kinesthetic StructuresAbstractThis paper describes how students are engaged in hands-on activities that reinforce complexengineering principles. In addition to utilizing chalk board examples for design and analysisproblems, physical modeling, not necessarily traditional laboratory testing, is implemented tolink engineering theory with building behavior. Students design, build, and learn how structuresbehave in three dimensions.IntroductionFive years ago, the author switched careers and from practice to
with staff at the Albany Nanotechnology Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, the Cornell Nanoscale Science and Technology Center, and the Nanofabrication Manufacturing Technology Partnership of Penn State regarding several week-long sessions at their locations. Page 13.423.4 The nanotechnology electives include: • Semiconductor Manufacturing: The Making of Integrated Circuits Reviews the history of semiconductor manufacturing, the processes used in making integrated circuits, e.g. photolithography, deposition, implantation, etching, metallization, CMP, and packaging. • Micro-electro-mechanical
also work in the design studios, electronic andmeasurement laboratories and they use for solving the tasks more than 15 different softwaretools.After the roll-out of the racing car the students start testing the systems and components, andadjust the performance, primarily the vehicle dynamics, using modern on- and off-board tools.The signals acquired with the telemetric system are saved onboard and evaluated later offlinewith Matlab® or Diadem®. Supported by industrial sponsors they drive the car on provinggrounds. The aim is to be perfectly prepared for the competitions.The SAE ® competition consists of two event packages: the static events and the dynamicevents. During the static events the university teams have to defend their technical