, A.G. and Safferman, S.I. 2004. Understanding k-12 engineering outreach programs. J. Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 130 (2): 95-108.5. Kimmel, H., Carpinelli, J., Alexander, L.B. and Rockland, R. 2006. Bringing engineering into k-12 schools: A problem looking for solutions? In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Chicago, IL.6. Hirsch, L.S., Carpinelli, J.D., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R. and Bloom, J. 2006. The differential effects of pre- engineering curricula on middle school students’ attitudes to and knowledge of engineering careers. In Proceedings of the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Milwaukee, WI.7. Apedoe, X.S., Reynolds, B
bendingmoment conditions above the yield moment, My, but less than the plastic moment, Mp. Forrectangular cross-sections, with a depth, h, and width, b, the plastic moment Mp = 1.5My. Theyield moment is the condition that just produces yield stress, y, at the top and bottom of thebeam, and the plastic moment is the condition that produces yield stress over the full depth of thebeam. A bending moment between these two values is the elasto-plastic moment, Mep. Figure 1. Normal stress-strain diagram for elastic, perfectly-plastic material. Page 26.212.3 Figure 2. Normal strain and stress distribution (profile view) due to elasto-plastic
., (2012) Attributes of aGlobal Engineer: Field-Informed Perspectives, Recommendations, and Implications, 2012 ASEE AnnualConference, San Antonio, TX, 2012[6] Parkinson, A., (2009), The Rationale for Developing Global Competence, Online Journal of GlobalEngineering Education, 4(2)[7] Pears, A.N., Daniles, M., and Cajander, A.S., (2014), Integrating Global Systems Development Skills intothe Engineering Curriculum, 2014 ASEE International Forum, Indianapolis, IN, 2014[8] Morkos, B., Summers, J.D., and Thoe, S., (2014), A Comparative Survey of Domestic and InternationalExperiences in Capstone Design, International Journal of Engineer Education, 30(1), 79-90, 2014[9] Blumenthal, Peggy, Grothus, Ulrich, (2008), Developing Global
contact with real world engineers. At these events, she asked several professionalengineer alumni “What was the most useful class you ever took?,” a common answer wasEngineering Leadership) and the importance of Calculus and math calculation skills on the job.She particularly wanted to clarify the importance of Calculus, after she received a disappointing“B” in her first semester. The engineers’ answers reinforce her sense that real-world engineeringhas a place, and a prominent place, for Rachel: And he's like, let me tell you-- on a really bad day I have to square something. Like I have to like make the cosine of Pi/3. And I was like oh really? He's like yeah… like… I don't, like, and he was saying like, you can always be an
Paper ID #12565Problematizing Best Practices for Pairing in K-12 Student Design TeamsMs. Gina M Quan, University of Maryland, College Park Gina Quan is a doctoral candidate in Physics Education Research at the University of Maryland, Col- lege Park. She graduated in 2012 with a B.A. in Physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Her research interests include understanding community and identity formation, unpacking students’ re- lationships to design, and cultivating institutional change. Ms. Quan is also a founding member of the Access Network, a research-practice community dedicated to fostering supportive
/ Page 26.12.13obamaadministrationlaunchescompetitionthreenewmanufacturinginnova [2] Kim, M. and M. L. Maher (2008). “The impact of tangible user interfaces on designers’ spatial cognition.” HumanComputer Interaction 23(2): 101–137. [3] Viswanathan, V. and J. Linsey (2012). “Physical models and design thinking: A study of functionality, novelty and variety of ideas.” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 134(9): 091004091001091012. [4] Sheppard, S. D. and R. Jenison (1997). “Freshman engineering design experiences: An organizational framework.” International Journal of Engineering Education 13(3): 190–197. [5] Jariwala, A. S., Burks Fasse, B., Quintero, C., Forest, C. R., Linsey, J., Ngo, P
Science, Technology & Society, 22(1), 31-41.18. Patterson, E. A., Campbell, P. B., Busch-Vishniac, I., & Guillaume, D. W. (2011). The effect of context on student engagement in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(3), 211-224. Page 26.1326.12
). Page 26.355.8Figure 2, using the same time axis, shows the university-wide pass rate in Calculus I, (number ofA, B, C grades divided by total 10th day enrollment.) The results show a clear correlationbetween the implementation of Coherent Calculus across multiple sections (beginning in Spring2014) and improved pass rates in the course. Calc I Pass Rate 80.0% 75.0% 70.0% 65.0% 60.0% 55.0% 50.0% Spring 2008 Spring 2009 Spring 2010
minimizing the tracking error should be explored. Second, a better voxel grid method thatimproves the quality of the resulting object models should be developed. Third and finally,prototype applications should be chosen and implemented to prove the validity and impact of thiswork.6. References[1] Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R. & Pezalla-Granlund, M., 2008, “New Pathways into Robotics: Strategies for Broadening Participation,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1) 59-69.[2] Benitti, F. B. V., 2012, “Exploring the Educational Potential of Robotics in Schools: A Systematic Review,” Computers & Education, 58(3) 978-988.[3] Mitnik, R., Nussbaum, M. & Soto, A., 2008, “An Autonomous Educational Mobile Robot Mediator
Deevelopmen ntAbstra actIn an effo ort to expandd The Univeersity of Maiine’s Electriccal Engineerring Technollogy program maprotectiv ve relay lab is being deveeloped. The lab is using donated Schhweitzer Enggineering Laabs,Inc. (SELLINC) micro oprocessor based b protecttive relays. TThe equipment is being setup to mim micreal worlld conditionss. Further, a CMC 356 relay r testing tool from OOmicron USA A is being ussedto validatte operation of the relays and exposee students too state of the art test equiipment. Theerelay lab will be used f a course specific to
? Page 26.231.8 B. Results from faculty surveyUse of solution manuals has a damaging effect on student learning.As indicated in literature, faculty traditionally believe that solution manuals have a damagingeffect on student learning and use of solution manuals is a type of cheating. The results of thissurvey question indicate that faculty have accepted the fact that problem solutions are availableand students can easily access them. The focus is now how to make the best of the situation andlook at solution manuals as a learning tool. As Figure 6 indicates, there is no strong opinionregarding the possible damaging effects of solution manuals on student learning among faculty. 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Strongly Agree
populated by instances where students were influenced fromhigh-school recruiters, college tours, and college pamphlets.References 1. National Science Foundation. (2013, November). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Enginering. Retrieved April 12, 2014, from National Science Foundation: www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/tables.cfm 2. Klotz, L., Potvin, G., Godwin, A., Cribbs, J., Hazari, Z., & Barclay, N. (2014). Sustainablity as a Route to Broaden Participation in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103, 137-153. 3. Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., Sheu, H.-B., & Lopez, A. M. (2011). Social cognitive predictors of the interests and choices of computing major
theforeseeable future.References[1] Dunne, B., Blauch, A., Sterian, A. (2005). The Case for Computer Programming Instruction for AllEngineering Disciplines. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference&Exposition[2] Hall, D., H. Hegab, and J. Nelson. (2008) Living WITH the Lab - A Freshman Curriculum to Boost Hands-onLearning, Student Confidence and Innovation. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. SaratogaSprings, NY. October 22-25, 2008, IEEE.[3] McKnight, S., Tadmor, G., Ruane, M., Rodriguez-Solis, R., & Saulnier, G. (2002). Creating ‘High-Tech Toolsand Toys Lab’ Learning Environments at Four Universities. ASEE/IEEE 32nd Frontiers in Education Conference,2: S3E7-6.[4] Jaeger, B., Freeman, S
Detroit Mercy. He has published more than 60 journal and conference papers. He is the Publicity Chair in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics. He is on the Conference Committee in 2012 International Conference on In- formation and Automation and International Symposium on Biomedical Engineering and Publicity Chair in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics. He was Chair of IEEE SEM - Com- putational Intelligence Chapter and is currently a Vice Chair of IEEE SEM-CIS and Chair of Education Committee of IEEE SEM. He was Chair in International Conferences such IEEE IJCNN2014 and IEEE SSCI2014
Paper ID #12371Student Perceptions on the Impact of Formative Peer Team Member Effec-tiveness Evaluation in an Introductory Design CourseProf. Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nathan Mentzer is an assistant professor in the College of Technology with a joint appointment in the College of Education at Purdue University. Hired as a part of the strategic P12 STEM initiative, he prepares Engineering/Technology candidates for teacher licensure. Dr. Mentzer’s educational efforts in pedagogical content knowledge are guided by a research theme centered in student learning of engineer- ing design thinking on the
then choosing one that is most appropriate. Students areencouraged to develop design and research ideas which may stem from the need to: a. Improve existing technology and methods b. Find new methods and processes c. Repurpose existing non-medical technology for a biomedical applications d. Modify a biomedical technology for use in environments with fewer resources e. Modify a biomedical technology for use by a different customer baseFigure 1: The general layout of the senior project course with the type of assessment tools used.The rationale behind repeatedly requiring the students to find/create many options and thenchoosing one/few, is to give them practice in developing and using a selection criterion based onreal-world
datatransmission. In this section, we introduce our assumptions and detection approach. Sensornetworks are susceptible to several types of attacks.WSNs is composed of base station and sensor nodes. Sensor nodes are grouped into clusters.Each cluster has several nodes as shown in Figure 2. A packet is transferred via a source node tothe base station using a route. During the transmission any malicious node drop a packet, theneighbor nodes work as monitoring and detect the packet that drop by the adversary. In ourapproach, any node located in an intermediate is responsible to detect the malicious nodes.The selective forwarding attack in example of Figure 3 may happen between sensor nodes. Thus,node “ A” transfers the packets to node “ B” and then node “ B
with companies with international experience. Also, a greaterappreciation of cultural differences allows for a well-rounded future manufacturer who in duecourse can compete globally more efficiently and develop products capable taking over marketsin different cultures8. As a result of the Experimental Vehicles Program, indirect culturaldiffusion transpires and ethnocentricity and cultural bias can be eliminated¹. Figure 2a-d showsEVP’s vehicles at competitions.Figure 2a-d. Examples of the EVP vehicles. a. b. c. d. Page 26.562.5Master of Science in Professional
. Figure 3 shows middle school students participating in some of these experiences.Spring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 10-11, 2015 Villanova University a. Building a paper cross b. Building a gum drop dome c. Building a wooden truss d. Load testing a truss Figure 1. Sixth grade students engaged in building and testing structures.Spring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 10-11, 2015 Villanova University a. xxx Figure 2. Seventh grade students testing the pH of household items using red cabbage indicator solution.Spring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 10-11, 2015 Villanova University a. Taking measurements b
exam performance could not be evaluated as a measure of theflipped classroom due to the changes in the overall examination strategy.In Figure 1, student scores on Exam 1 have been converted to probability density functions basedon the sample mean and standard deviation of the score set, assuming a normal distribution. (a) Figure 1(a) compares the overall distribution of scores from Fall 2013 and Fall 2014, while Figure 1(b) compares the
actual control-groups.Performance Results Fall 2014In the Programming class, the fall 2014 grade distribution shows similar trends to the gradedistribution from fall 2013-spring 20144. Table 2 shows that 16% more students in the SLCpassed the MATLAB course than students in the programming control group. Table 2: Pass/Fail rates in the MATLAB class for fall 2014 cohort Passing Failing FA14 Students AU W (A/B/C) (D/F) SLC (n=47) 66% 25.5% 0% 8.5% Control Group (n=16) 50% 37.5% 6.25% 6.25%Table 3 compares the specific
, and regulatory constraints/considerations. The domain of health care / health design is different from consumer product development, and more complex. (B) We seek to provide an immersive clinical experience. UIC is uniquely situated for its ability to provide a strong and meaningful clinical immersion experience. First-hand exposure to clinical environments provides a holistic view that will help students understand the broader impact that design can have on improved interactions, experiences, devices and ultimately medical outcomes. And it is only through this deep knowledge of the environment that they can frame (or re-frame) complex design problems to approach and solve
Squared2 ISMB Non ISMB UndeclaredPre HW 6 3.74 1.117 2.85 1.068 3.38 .744 3.773 .027* .090 a b bPost HW 6 4.71 1.043 4.85 .899 4.50 1.195 .276 .759 .007 a a aPre-Post HW 6 Difference .97*** 2.00*** 1.12*12 *** p < .001, ** p < .01, * p < .053 medium = 0.06, and large = 0.14 18. Eta-squared guidelines: small = 0.01,Groups with the same letter are
Paper ID #12210Work-in-Progress: Incoming Student Technology EducationDr. James E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals in the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. His research interests include paral- lel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology (Tablet PCs) used in the classroom.Dr. Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville Jeffrey L. Hieb is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the Univer
-Productivity Declines in the Construction Industry: Causes and Remedies (Another Look), AECbytes Viewpoint #67, March 14, 2013. 2. Kent, D. C. and Becerik-Gerber, B. (2010). Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(8), 815-825. 3. AIA California Council (2007). Integrated project delivery: a working definition. [WWW document]. URL http://ipd-ca.net/images/Integrated%20Project%20Delivery%20Definition.pdf (Visited October 4, 2012). 4. Ghassemi, R. and Becerik-Gerber, B. (2011). Transitioning to integrated project delivery: potential barriers and lessons learned. Lean Construction Journal, 2011, 32-52. 5. Sabongi, F. J. (2009
upon the number of good partsproduced and the defect rate 3. However, there has been no report so far that a simple hands-onexperiment has been designed to help the engineering students apply the control charts in theSQR course.3. design of the catapult experimentThe catapult project simulates the manufacturing improvement process. It uses a catapult tosimulate a production process and a target board as product specifications. As the major shootingequipment in the experiment, the catapult is shown in Figure 1 (a). The projectile is either atennis ball or a golf ball as shown in Figure 1 (b). The target board is made of plastic foam. It has3 concentric circles. The largest circle has the diameter of about 1 foot (as shown in Figure 1(c)). The
levels (to the left). Grades for each level are shown in thebottom row.Insufficient to Describes reading, and also includes and also includes Comprehensiveassess drawing work reflection on what reflection on aspects response with performed since has been learned of the course where insight, the last in-class from this activity I feel I lack demonstrated by a assessment (labelled *B*), confidence and what question for the (labelled *A*), is needed to help tutor to answer. overcome this
in engineering. These institutions may need to have moderate expectations relativeto retention, but could expect other valuable outcomes for their women students.1. Marra, R. M., & Bogue, B. (2006). Women Engineering Students' Self Efficacy--A Longitudinal Multi- Institution Study. Women in Engineering ProActive Network.2. Tsui, Lisa. "Effective strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: A review of the research literature." The Journal of Negro Education (2007): 555-581.3. Goodman, I. F. (2002). Final Report of the Women's Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) Project. Online Submission.4. Bottomley, L. J., Rajala, S., & Porter, R. (1999, November). Women in engineering at North Carolina
, H.H. "A synthetic analysis of the effectiveness of single components and packages in creativity training programs." Creativity Research Journal 18(4): 435-446 2006.5. Lande, M., Jordan, S.S., and Nelson, J. "Defining makers making: Emergent practice and emergent meanings". ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, GA, 2013.6. Sheridan, K., Halverson, E.R., Litts, B., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., and Owens, T. "Learning in the Making: A Comparative Case Study of Three Makerspaces." Harvard Educational Review 84(4): 505-531 2014 http://hepg.metapress.com/content/BRR34733723J648U.7. Forest, C.R., Moore, R.A., Jariwala, A.S., Fasse, B.B., Linsey, J., Newstetter, W., Ngo, P., and Quintero, C
responsibilities; evaluating task progress and group interaction;understanding the task; and generating new ideas or solutions. These communication challengesbecame the basis for reflective survey questions, observers’ notes, and class debriefings.Taking a design-based approach24, 25 in this, our second iteration of these processes, the studyprotocols occurred over three 50-minute class periods on consecutive days in a design-reflect-design process (i.e., Project #1, reflection on communication patterns, Project #2). The first andsecond authors were both present for all activities. Students were assigned to one of two roles forthe entire process: (a) engineering design-team member in three-to-five member teams, or (b)design-team student-observer. On Day 1