Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 1411 - 1440 of 1994 in total
Conference Session
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies: Aero and Mechanical Engineering
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University; Joseph F. Mandara, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
, District of Columbia. https://peer.asee.org/59902 Mariappan, J., & Newell, J. A., & Schmalzel, J. L., & Ramachandran, R., & Sukumaran, B., & Marchese, A. J.(1999, June), The Sophomore Engineering Clinic: An Introduction To The Design Process Through A Series OfOpen Ended Projects Paper presented at 1999 Annual Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina.https://peer.asee.org/79463 Simone, M., & Jansson, P. M., & Riddell, W., & Farrell, S. (2008, June), Communication In A Project BasedLearning Design Course Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.https://peer.asee.org/33184 E. Constans, J. Courtney, K. Dahm, J. Everett, C. Gabler, R. Harvey, L. Head, D. Hutto, H. Zhang Setting
Conference Session
Electrical and Computer Division Poster Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Paul Douglas Kearsley, Western Washington University; Andrew G. Klein, Western Washington University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
observable, an anonymous survey was administered andstudents were asked to self-report on their awareness of their higher-order cognitive thinking.While such self-reporting surveys have limitations, the results of this initial work in progresssuggest that under this model, students are more aware of their learning, they spend more timereviewing and evaluating their solutions, and they report that self-grading and self-correctingleads to an improved understanding of the material. Future work will expand this initial casestudy into a longitudinal study designed to test the impact of this model on student learning whencompared to a control group.References [1] R. Kelley and B. Dooley, “The technology of cheating,” in IEEE Intl. Symp. on Ethics in
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael M. Umbriac, University of Michigan; Amy Hortop, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
 lathe machines before they could use these machines to build their projects.  (The mills and lathes have controls which are much more complicated than those of the drill presses or bandsaws.) Two issues were identified.  Firstly, although the machine shop technicians demonstrated safe practices during the training, this was not hands­on training for the students. Secondly, there were two months between the end of the training and the start of the project work.  During this time, students could forget some of the procedures.  Other researchers have reported similar findings (Haynie, 2009.)   To resolve both of these issues, the machine shop technicians developed mill and lathe exercises, show in Appendices A and B.  The students have one month
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cassandra J McCall, Virginia Tech; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
Paper ID #15019Disciplinary Influences on the Professional Identity of Civil Engineering Stu-dents: Starting the ConversationMiss Cassandra Jo Groen, Virginia Tech Cassandra is currently a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, VA. Her research interests include student engineering identity development, communication practices and discourse strategies, power negotiation, and student artifact development. She earned her Masters (2011) and Bachelors (2009) degrees in Civil Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in Rapid City, SD.Dr. Denise Rutledge
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 10
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tobias Haertel, TU Dortmund University; Claudius Terkowsky, TU Dortmund University; Dominik May, TU Dortmund University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 285-295.17. Kim, K. H., & Coxon, S. V. (2013). The Creativity Crisis, Possible Causes, and What Schools Can Do. In J. B. Jones & L. J. Flint (Eds.), The Creative Imperative (pp. 53-68). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.18. Rollo May: The Courage to Create. New York: Nortin, rev. ed., 1994.19. U. Bertram, W. Preißing, “Navigieren im offenen System: Unternehmensführung ist ein künstlerischer Prozess,”, Leonberg: Container Verl., 2007.20. J. A. Fodor, “A theory of the cild’s theory of mind,” in Cognition, vol. 44, 1992, pp. 282-296.21. S. H Schwartz, “Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries,” in M
Conference Session
Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Connor Robert Bilchak, Columbia University; J. Patrick Abulencia, Manhattan College
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
such as transportation, electricitygeneration, etc.) which encompasses about 10% of typical Fig. 2. Student responses to survey multiple questions regarding A) the efficiacy of using commonly known structures to gain a sense of scale, B)annual use[8] . Over 80% of the students found that basing the their awareness of environmental concerns after the projects conclusion, andreservoir foundation on areas that were familiar to them aided C) how accurate they feel their reservoir design would compare to actualthem in understanding the volume of reservoir volume that requirementswas required. This is important to note from both a design
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emad Habib, University of Louisiana, Lafayette; David G Tarboton, Utah State University; Matthew Wayne Deshotel, University of Louisiana at Lafayette; David J Farnham, Columbia University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
(summary of the Water, Earth, and Biota initiative as a 2000highlight for Geosciences), Geotimes, 46(7), 25-26.4. Hooper, R., and E. Foufoula-Georgiou (2008), Advancing the Theory and Practice of Hydrologic Science, EosTrans. AGU, 89(39), doi:10.1029/2008EO390005.5. CUAHSI (2010). Water in a Dynamic Planet: A Five-year Strategic Plan for Water Science(http://dx.doi.org/10.4211/sciplan.200711).6. Shaw, S. B., and M. T. Walter (2012), Using comparative analysis to teach about the nature of nonstationarityin future flood predictions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16(5), 1269–1279, doi:10.5194/hess-16-1269-2012.7. Meselhe, E., McCorquodale, J.A., Shelden, J., Dortch, M., Brown, T.S., Elkan, P., Rodrigue, M.D., Schindler,J.K
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 11
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Victor Taratukhin, Stanford University; Anastasiia Baryshnikova, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Yury V. Kupriyanov, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Jörg Becker
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Paper ID #17224Digital Business Framework: Shaping Engineering Education for Next-Genin the Era of Digital EconomyProf. Victor Taratukhin, Stanford University Victor Taratukhin received his Ph.D. in Engineering Design in 1998 and Ph.D. in Computing Sciences and Engineering in 2002. Victor was a Lecturer in Decision Engineering and Module Leader (IT for Product Realization) at Cranfield University, UK (2001-2004), SAP University Alliances Program Director (2004- 2012). He is Managing Director, Competence Center ERP at European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS), University of Muenster, Germany (2012-present) and
Conference Session
Capstone Design Courses II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
April M. Bryan, Western Washington University; John Andrew Lund, Western Washington University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
M3 M1 M7 M2 M2 M3 M2 M4 M4 M4 M5 M5 M5 (a) (b) (c) Fig. 5 Final Product Family of Lamps: (a) Office Lamp
Conference Session
Curriculum Development in Two-Year Engineering and Engineering Technology Programs
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ibrahim F. Zeid, Northeastern University; Chitra N. Javdekar, Massachusetts Bay Community College; Claire Duggan, Northeastern University; Marina Bograd
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Two Year College Division
Business BU 100 Introduction to Business 3 AC 101 Financial Accounting I 4 MG 101 Principles of Management 3 MK 103 Principles of Marketing 3 MK 213 Principles of Sales 3 MG 210 Entrepreneurship 3 OA 201 Business Communications 3 Manufacturing MN 133 A New Product Development 2 MN 133 B Lean Six Sigma Fundamentals 2The 25 credit Manufacturing Technology Certificate program (see Table 1 for detailedcurriculum with advising notes
Conference Session
Research on Diversification, Inclusion, and Empathy II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joachim Walther, University of Georgia; Shari E. Miller, University of Georgia; Nicola W. Sochacka, University of Georgia; Michael Alvin Brewer jr., University of Georgia
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
navigate these situations.Example skill exercise: Following a discussion of the term “affective”, students are asked tocomplete the following series of activities. 1. Recall the most challenging situation you encountered this semester. This can relate to this course, other courses or experiences outside school. 2. In your group of two, take turns to share the details of the specific experience with your partner. Focus on the following aspects to facilitate a productive reflective process: a. What was the situation? What led up to it? What did you do/ say? What did other people do/ say? What happened afterwards. b. How did you experience the situation? How did you feel in the beginning
Conference Session
Environmental Engineering Division: Engagement, Experiential Learning, and Balance
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado - Boulder; Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado - Boulder; Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado - Boulder
Tagged Divisions
Environmental Engineering
- project management, 17 - business and public administration, and 18 -leadership.Given the background related to individuals’ needs for autonomy and the importance thatengineers possess both technical and non-technical skills, the following research questionsmotivated this study:(1) To what extent do top-ranked environmental engineering programs allow students to make choices in their courses (such as free electives and technical electives)? a. How do choice opportunities in EnvE compare to chemical and civil engineering degrees? b. How do choice opportunities in EnvE compare to non-engineering degrees in chemistry, math, and physics?(2) What is the balance of required technical and non-technical courses in top
Conference Session
Capstone and Collaborations in Civil Engineering
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kevin G. Sutterer, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; John Aidoo, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Jeremy R. Chapman, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; James H. Hanson P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Kyle Kershaw P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Matthew D. Lovell P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Jennifer Mueller PE P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Michael Anthony Robinson P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
” courses in the winter term, designated CE487x, arementored by sub-discipline faculty experts in 4 different sub-discipline areas. Each individualstudent is mentored in a part of the system design. The four sub-discipline courses are • CE487E – Environmental and Water Resources Design • CE487G – Geotechnical Design • CE487S – Structural Design • CE487T – Transportation and Land Development DesignKeeping in mind the mentoring structure in Figure 1 and course structure in Table 1, Figure 2depicts an example of how students from some of the ten teams might be organized in theirteams and courses. Figure 2. Organization of student teams in coursesTeam B in the figure corresponds to the sub-discipline assignments in Figure
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Learning Outcomes and Assessment
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Oscar H. Salcedo, University of Texas, El Paso
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
Academy ofEngineering. August.7 Borrego, B., Froyd, J. E. & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey ofAwareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments. Journal of Engineering Education, p188                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    8 Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal ofOperational Research, 177, 1333-1352.9
Conference Session
Labs & Hands-on Instruction II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Maria Lorelei Fernandez, Florida International University; Natalie Paul, Florida International University; Ismail Guvenc, Florida International University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
undergraduates in research projects is assessing the extent that theprograms are achieving their goals to motivate student interest in pursuing careers and advanceddegrees in STEM-related fields. The generation and use of data to modify and improve theprograms is often neglected. The purpose of this study was to gather data to understand variousaspects of undergraduate students’ summer research experiences in wireless communications andto consider successful aspects and areas for modification or improvement. We sought tounderstand the undergraduate students’ perceptions about their summer research projects, as wellas the contexts of their experiences with respect to the following aspects: (a) their researchprojects; (b) their methods of learning from
Conference Session
The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jonathan S Weedon, Case Western Reserve University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
”, but Criteria 5 (b) on curriculum requirements does define engineering designas “a decision-making process (often iterative), in which the basic sciences, mathematics, and theengineering sciences are applied to convert resources optimally to meet [ the client’s] statedneeds.”6 As a decision-making process, engineering design includes the act of judgment7.Decisions are arrived at through judgment; it is judgment that recognizes when a decision is to bemade and the reason for making each decision1. Engineering judgment cannot be taught directly, since its application requires the contextof the unforeseen, the in-process, contingent, and indeterminate. What educators do is putstudents in situations that call for the practice of engineering
Conference Session
Curriculum and New Course Development in ET
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ali Ahmad, Northwestern State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
resources, andprocess planning. The specific ABET ETAC student outcomes for Engineering Technology are4: a. An ability to select and apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of the discipline to broadly-defined engineering technology activities b. An ability to select and apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to engineering technology problems that require the application of principles and applied procedures or methodologies c. An ability to conduct standard tests and measurements; to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments; and to apply experimental results to improve processes d. An ability to design systems, components, or processes for broadly-defined engineering
Conference Session
Mentoring, Advising, and Facilitating Learning
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Thomas F. Schubert Jr. P.E., University of San Diego; Frank G. Jacobitz, University of San Diego; Ernest M. Kim, University of San Diego
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
distinct preference for the SMSE ideationspace: “I liked using the ideation space b/c there is more room to communicate with otherstudents, as well as the professor.” Other students had a positive perspective on both spaces: ”Ithink both spaces were fine, but more individual in office and a lot of peer help as well asprofessor’s help in ideation space.”Still, large spaces do have negative aspects: “I feel others are distracted if there are lots ofstudents making noise in the ideation space”; “[the] office is quieter”. One situation noticed byboth faculty and students was the tendency for students to cluster around the professor creating asituation similar to a wall-less office: “I believe that when the office hours were done in theideation space
Conference Session
Integrating Systems Engineering into the Capstone Project
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vigyan Jackson Chandra, Eastern Kentucky University
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering, Systems Engineering
-based learning in post-secondary education - theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education, 51(2), 287-314.12. Davis, J. R., & Arend, B. D. (2013). Facilitating Seven ways of learning: A resource for more purposeful, effective, and enjoyable college teaching. Sterling, VA: Stylus13. Flake, C. (1993). Holistic education: Principles, perspectives, and practices. Brandon, VT: Holistic Education Press.14. Sylwester, R. (1995). A celebration of neurons: An educator's guide to the human brain. Alexandria: VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.15. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.16. Egan, G. (2010). The skilled helper
Conference Session
Computers in Education Division Poster Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rachael Alexandra Mansbach, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Geoffrey L. Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Matthew West, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Dallas R. Trinkle , University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Andrew Ferguson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Andre Schleife, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
longitudinal integration of computational modules across the sophomore andjunior years was intended to reinforce student awareness of computation, build confidence inusing computational tools, and cement the idea of computation as the third pillar of sciencealongside experiment and theory. Accordingly, we expected that this integration would (a) makeabstract theoretical concepts more accessible, (b) promote active learning and hands-onengagement, and (c) develop student competency in computational materials science softwaretools.The second aim of this effort was to develop a new senior-year computational materials scienceelective MSE 498AF. The course has been dramatically reconceived to serve as an integratedcomputational materials science and
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Teamwork
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Pilar Pazos, Old Dominion University; Nina Magpili, Engineering Management & Systems Engineering (EMSE), Old Dominion University; Zikai Zhou, Old Dominion University; Luis Jose Rodriguez, Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
(2012): 401-417.21. Pazos, P., and M. Beruvides. "Incorporating training and feedback into the study of patterns in group decision making: The impact of communication medium." Team Performance Management 17, no. 1/2 (2011): 83-101.22. DeSanctis, Gerardine, and Marshall Scott Poole. "Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory." Organization Science 5, no. 2 (1994): 121-147.23. Venkatesh, Viswanath, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. "User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view." MIS Quarterly (2003): 425-478.24. Stevens, Michael J., and Michael A. Campion. "The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5A: Work-In-Progress: 5 Minute Postcard Session I
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rachel McCord Ellestad, University of Tennessee - Knoxville
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
, our US institutions still suffer from low retention ofengineering students across four years and an undergraduate population that lacks diversity.These issues were the impetus for the creation of a course to teaching engineering students howto develop their self-regulated learning skills.Development of a First Year Studies Course for Engineering Students In an effort to teach first year engineering students at a large, southern research university(LSRU) how to develop self-regulated learning skills, a course was developed and piloted in Fall2015. This first year studies course, FYS 101-eng, was a 13 week, 1 hour credit course that wasgraded on an A, B, C, no credit scale. First Year Studies is a larger department at LSRU andorganizes FYS
Conference Session
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Professional Development for Students and Teachers
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Claire Duggan, Northeastern University; Maureen D. Cabrera, Center for STEM Education; Madeline Jean Leger
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division
andobjectives are to: a. Provide high school participants an authentic summer research experience. b. Provide participants an opportunity to learn about cutting edge research in engineering and other STEM fields. c. Introduce participants to a STEM support community that will transcend program participation consisting of faculty, students, program alumni and peers. d. Provide opportunities for faculty and university students to support K12 students through mentoring and research support. e. Provide participants essential information regarding applying to and succeeding in college. f. Increase the participants’ awareness of STEM careers, with
Conference Session
Environmental Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David C. Zgonc, United States Military Academy; Phil Dacunto P.E., United States Military Academy; Emily Arija Ezerins, United States Military Academy; Dalton Jefferson Alexander Combs, United States Military Academy; Jacob Neil Palmer, United States Army
Tagged Divisions
Environmental Engineering
peersand thus spawn professional growth. By marrying individual studies and a capstone course, the proposed model better meets theintent of ABET General Criterion 3 and General Criterion 5. These criterion sketch theknowledge bridge this proposed curriculum model seeks to build. ABET Student OutcomeCriterion 3-a, 3-b, and 3-e outline the need for the student to demonstrate the ability to applymath and science by designing and conducting experiments related to an identified problem.Then, in Student Outcome Criterion 3-c and Curriculum Outcome 5-c, ABET requires that thestudent be able to apply this knowledge to “design a system, component, or process to meetdesired needs within realistic constraints…”2 Studying engineering is intensely time
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Peter R Turner, Clarkson University; Jeffrey Humpherys, Brigham Young University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
Currently a professor of Mathematics at Brigham Young University, where he has served on the faculty since 2005. He received his Ph.D. > in Mathematics from Indiana University in 2002 and was an Arnold Ross Assistant Professor at The Ohio State University from 2002-2005. Since then, he has won several grants from the National Science Foundation, including a CAREER award in 2009. His current research interests are in nonlinear and stochastic dynamical systems, numerical analysis and scientific computing, healthcare analytics, actuarial science, and network science. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Modeling across the Curriculum: A SIAM-NSF initiative
Conference Session
Research on Design Learning
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jackson Lyall Autrey, University of Oklahoma; Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
detailed and open-ended problems [13]. In order to preparestudents to face these challenges, we expose students to a scaffolded design process. As stated earlier, one of the key reasons the course is planned around such an intensive,semester-long project is that our goal is to get students to internalize the principles ofengineering design, which are as follows: 1. Planning a. Forming a team b. Team contract c. Understanding the problem and framing the problem statement d. Schedule 2. Preliminary design a. Ideation – generating ideas b. Developing concepts: Ensure functional feasibility, ensure realizability (buildability, safety, and cost) c
Conference Session
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies: Best Papers
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anahid Behrouzi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Daniel Kuchma, Tufts University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
developmentof skills identified by the engineering accreditation board (ABET) in Criterion 3, including: (a) apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; (b) design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; (e) identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; and (g) communicate effectively.3This paper provides details of the course under investigation including: a high-level descriptionof the inquiry-based learning techniques used in the class, particulars on a selection of effectiveactivities the instructors developed, a student assessment of the pedagogical approach, andlessons learned from this research study.Institutional Context & Details of CourseThe research described in this paper on
Conference Session
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Fundamental: K-12 Student Beliefs, Motivation, and Self Efficacy
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brenda Capobianco, Purdue University, West Lafayette; James D. Lehman, Purdue University; Qiming Huang, Purdue University; Chell Nyquist, Purdue University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division
elementary school teachers’ enactmentsof engineering design-based science instruction and to assess the impact of their instruction onstudents’ science learning.Research questionsThis study was guided by the following research questions: a) How do elementary schoolteachers enact engineering design-based science instruction? b) What is the fidelity of teachers’implementation? c) What knowledge do students learn when engaging in engineering design-based tasks? and d) To what extent does the fidelity of instruction correlate with students’science learning?Theoretical frameworkThis study is grounded in the theoretical construct of situated learning theory where learners(teachers and students) become part of a community of practice in which they learn
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University; David Reeping, Ohio Northern University; Heather Sapp, Ohio Northern University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
performance under a particular criterion is found to be either above or below thestated standards, then the blank space in the appropriate cell is used to provide either typed orhandwritten feedback specific to what has been observed. Additionally, the single point rubrichelps to underline the concept that meeting the expected performance is not equal to a grade of‘A’; instead, a 5-4-3-0 weighting factor is employed, thereby placing a display of consistentproficiency at the cusp of the ‘B’-‘C’ boundary of 80%, a value empirically derived from thetypical scores observed to be assigned to the average term project.With respect to creating value through the example behavior of persisting through and learningfrom failure, the clients reviewed the post
Conference Session
Professional Skills development in Design
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Matthew Cromwell, Utah State University - Engineering Education; Andreas Febrian, Utah State University - Engineering Education
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
develop andrecognize one’s own self-regulation in learning and teaching.ACKNOWLEDGMENT This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1148806. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography[1] ABET - Engineering Accreditation Commission, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Reviews During the 2015-2016 Accreditation Cycle. November, 2014[2] Zimmerman, B. J., “Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview.” Theory into Practice, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 64-70, 2002.[3] Zimmerman, B. J. Attaining self