Session 2353 Teaching Failure Analysis as an Independent Design Experience David V. Niebuhr California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407AbstractFailure analysis of an engineering component is similar to building a puzzle with only some ofthe pieces. The engineer is left to interpret the data and make an educated conclusion.Undergraduate engineers, while enjoying the investigative experience, are somewhat intimidatedby the many unknowns. In this course students select a failed engineering component andinvestigate the source of its demise. The evolution of the failure analysis course over 5 years isdescribed, as
Session 2553 A Freshman Module to Teach Instrumentation Methods Jagdish Gajjar Union CollegeAbstractEvolution of modern electronic devices has reached a level where a black-box approachto designing and building systems is within the capabilities of beginning laboratoryexperiments. This facilitates the introduction of modern instrumentation methods tofreshmen in an engineering curriculum. The paper describes a freshmen moduledesigned to provide an exposure to transducers, signal conditioning, computerinterfacing and signal processing. The module consists of a coordinated set of
, 2005.10. Noerenberg, J.W., II Bridging wireless protocols. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 39 (11). 90-97.11. Planet3 Wireless. Introduction - CWNP career certifications, 2006.12. Richards, B. and Stull, B. Teaching wireless networking with limited resources Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, ACM Press, Norfolk, Virginia, USA, 2004.13. Sarkar, N.I. Teaching computer networking fundamentals using practical laboratory exercises. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49 (2). 285-291.14. Shin, M., Ma, J., Mishra, A. and Arbaugh, W.A. Wireless network security and interworking. Proceedings of IEEE, 94 (2). 455-466.15. Snyder, J. Down and dirty with Wireless LAN security NetworkWorld
Valley State University Amy Lenz is faculty in mechanical engineering at Grand Valley State University, teaching dynamic sys- tems and controls. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Teaching Dynamic Systems and Control without DynamicsAbstractThis work-in-progress paper explores whether or not it is possible to teach dynamic systems andcontrol effectively to students who do not take dynamics. Grand Valley State University offerstwo different versions of a junior-level dynamic systems and control course. One version is formechanical engineering majors and requires dynamics as a prerequisite; the other version is forProduct Design and Manufacturing Engineering
revised sections, and have onefaculty member teach the other sections. All the instructors used common exams and homeworkassignments. The course instructors had been using a pre-assessment at the start of the course fora few years, so we have several years’ worth of baseline data. The final exam used similar itemsto previous semesters for comparison on key ideas. Students were randomly assigned to sectionsto avoid bias in any of the groups. Students were required to also enroll in chemistry laboratoryclasses. The laboratory sections were not yet revised during this study period. Student scores arebeing examined in all sections and across the laboratory sections.The symbolic lens was a significant area of concern for the reform of this course
on the numerical methodswith little emphasis on using the software and the other is to introduce a CFD software as avirtual reality laboratory in Fluid Mechanics class without emphasis on teaching software. In thefirst type, students need strong mathematical background to succeed in the class and also needfurther training to effectively use modern commercial software for real industrial application.While in the second type, students only learned an abstract form of CFD processes, thus they willnot be able to use CFD commercial software without further training in this area.This paper is about the use of CFD in teaching graduate students at this university who were in atwo year design track program. Many of these students did not have a good
in more detail.The Laboratory Experience After teaching the applied electromagnetics course twice as lecture-only, it becameapparent that the students would benefit greatly from an associated lab experience as detailed inTable 1.Table 1 – Laboratory AssignmentsLab Description Software and Hardware Tools Used Agilent 8712ET Network AnalyzerLab 1 Real Components – Study of the frequency response of resistors, inductors, and capacitors, determination of parasitic values. Orcad PSpiceLab 2 Parasitic Effects
Paper ID #39116Increasing Student Motivation and Learning by Adopting theExperiment-Centric Pedagogy: A Case of Undergraduates in BiologyMs. Blessing Isoyiza ADEIKA, Morgan State University Blessing ADEIKA is a graduate student at Morgan State University currently studying Advanced Com- puting. She has interest in teaching student basic concepts by adopting an Experiment-centric approach to it. She also is currently working towards being a Data Scientist - AI/ML Expert and hope to use her skills to prefer solutions in the Medical, Financial, Technology and any other Sector she sees a need to be filled/catered for.Dr
AC 2012-4796: A QUARTER-CENTURY OF TEACHING SPACECRAFTMISSION DESIGNDr. Wallace T. Fowler P.E., University of Texas, Austin Wallace Fowler has served on the faculty of the Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics at the University of Texas, Austin, since 1965. He is a Fellow of both the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. He served as National President of the ASEE in 2000-01. He currently directs the NASA Texas Space Grant Con- sortium. He was the recipient of the 1985 AIAA/ASEE John Leland Atwood Award and the 1994 ASEE Fred Merryfield Design Education Award
combination, percent Percent of labs 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Sapon/ester-ification Petrochemical Decolorization H2O2 decomposition Bioreactions Polymerization Other inorganic Simulated generic No reactionFigure 19. Percentage of laboratory activities which involve the listed reactionsEffective Teaching MethodsOne open-ended question allowed faculty to describe the unique features of the course as theyteach it. One theme that emerged from responses is an emphasis on teaching. Faculty mentionedsix different areas that they emphasize in teaching: • Problem-solving approaches
AC 2009-1500: TEACHING FACILITY-MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: A CASESTUDYSarel Lavy, Texas A&M University Dr. Sarel Lavy (corresponding author), Assistant Professor, Department of Construction Science, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3137, USA, e-mail address: slavy@archmail.tamu.edu. Dr. Lavy is a faculty member in the Department of Construction Science, which is one of four departments in the College of Architecture at Texas A&M University. He also serves as the Associate Director of the CRS Center for Leadership and Management in the Design and Construction Industry. Dr. Lavy is a member of the International Facility Management
: <25% Between 25 and 50% Between 50 and 75% >75% 25 [CompLabs]Do your students have computing laboratories available? Page 25.703.22 Please choose all that apply: Yes, maintained by the Department Yes, maintained by the College8 of 22 5/4/2011 5:37 PMUK College of Engineering Surveys - AIChE Best Practices in Teaching 2011 http://www.engr.uky.edu/survey/admin
AC 2011-369: TEACHING SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS IN ELECTRON-ICS LECTURE COURSESDavid Braun, California Polytechnic State University David Braun received the Ph.D. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of California at Santa Barbara in 1991. From 1992 to 1996, he worked for Philips Research Laboratories in Eindhoven, The Netherlands, on semiconducting polymers for display applications. He joined California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo in 1996 and is now a Professor in the Electrical Engineer- ing Department. See www.ee.calpoly.edu/faculty/dbraun/ for more information. He teaches courses in electronics, solid-state electronics, polymer electronics and sustainability. He holds
, instructional laboratories, and equity-focused teaching. She teaches biomedical instrumentation, signal processing, and control systems. She earned a Ph.D. in Systems Engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State University, and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Designing a Bioinstrumentation Lab for All LearnersIntroductionCombining the experiences of the instructor, teaching assistant, and students, we utilizedparticipatory action research and the application of entrepreneurial mindset to improve theexperience for all students in a
leveraging technology to enhance learning experiences and broaden access to engineering education. He has experience as a practicing engineer and has taught at the university and community-college levels. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work-in Progress: Aligning an Engineering Hands-On Learning Program to College Strategy: Reducing Implementation Barriers to Support Faculty, Students, and Their SuccessAbstractThis Work in Progress addresses two of ELOS’ requested foci: pedagogy and best practices oflaboratory courses and hands-on laboratory instruction. We describe a redesign plan in theIntegrated Teaching and Learning Program (ITLP) at University of Colorado Boulder
and Research Methods DivisionTags: IoT, VM, Virtual, Raspberry Pi, student labs, project development, virtual labsAbstractThe growing field of the Internet of Things (IoT) is valuable for Engineering and EngineeringTechnology students to know. Due to COVID and often limited resources, this can be a difficulttopic to teach. The authors pioneered a way to implement the same IoT systems both withphysical devices and a Virtual Machine (VM) environment using a Raspberry Pi with servos,buttons, and lights. The VM used the Quick Emulator (QEMU) on the Ubuntu Linux platform.QEMU is a type 2 hypervisor that runs within the user space and performs virtual hardwareemulation. The authors developed educational activities which allowed AAS/AOS level
. Additional work is ongoing to assess the efficacy of theteaching modalities in individual courses and will be subject of future publications. IntroductionMost engineering and computer science faculty members at our public university prefer teaching in aface-to-face format in the classroom instead of teaching virtually. However, during the COVID-19pandemic, the faculty are asked to choose among five teaching modalities that cope with the pandemic.The teaching modalities offered by the university are ‘Traditional Classroom/Laboratory,’ ‘BlendedHybrid,’ ‘Flexible mode,’ ‘Remote Virtual,’ and ‘Online.’It is important to note that a complete learning management system [1] is widely implemented acrossthe
Teaching Design Engineering Technology: Experiential Learning Activities John L. Irwin, EdD Michigan Technological UniversityAbstractThis research shows that experiential learning using problem-based simulation activitieswas perceived by students and teachers as a valuable tool to use in design engineeringand in the education of CAD/Drafting students. The simulation activities offer manyadvantages to the user in visualizing results and being able to predict more accuratelyanswers to problems. Results are shared from action research projects involving highschool design/CAD students, university workshop participants, and university
asgraduate students. It would be foolish indeed not to tap this source of valuable expertise and use it toimprove communication skills at the undergraduate level. It is important, though, to take formal steps toplace graduate students into the role of communication mentors.Implementation Four laboratory courses in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State Universityare targeted in the communication effort: Heat Transfer, Vibrations, Controls, and Fluid Mechanics. Twenty-five teaching assistants will eventually grade both technical and composition areas. That is, the TA’s willgrade not only the technical abilities of undergraduates but also the methods that these students use topresent that information completely, clearly, and
instructor,whether the students believed she was female or male), no difference in the student ratings of theinstructors was found. However, when SET results were grouped by perceived instructor gender(i.e. both the female and male instructors, when the students believed each was female), studentsrated the perceived male instructor as significantly better than the perceived female instructor.These findings support the idea that there is a real bias that exists among students in evaluatinginstructors, not simply a difference in the teaching styles or teaching effectiveness betweenfemale and male instructors.Another study performed a laboratory experiment where students were shown an identicallecture delivered by a stick figure with a gender-neutral
Little None too difficult just right too easy Figure 6: Anonymous mid-term survey data during the completion of Lab 5.Future Work:Our neuron board demonstrated that the complete PCB design and build cycle is capable at Bay-lor University. A future lab may teach the students part or all of this build cycle. Candidate de-sign projects include: building a PCB for the AVR microprocessor to replace the Xplained Mini,building a DAC PCB to replace our expensive DAC board, building their own neuron circuit per-haps with a DAC on-board the PCB. We would also like to integrate a low-cost portable oscillo-scope/logic analyzer into the laboratories. A candidate is the Analog Discovery 2 by Digilent5(Shown in the
and Environmental Engineering, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-6603 Page 11.268.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Benefits and Challenges of Training Teaching AssistantsAbstractGraduate teaching assistants (TAs) contribute significantly to laboratory instruction,grading, and, to a lesser extent, classroom instruction in undergraduate engineeringeducation. However, many universities/colleges do not offer formal training forengineering TAs and, instead, rely on generalized workshops and orientations offered bythe University or Graduate School. While these workshops are beneficial to
TEACHING PLC IN AUTOMATION --A Case Study Dr. George Yang, Assistant Professor And Dr. Yona Rasis, Assistant Professor Department of Engineering Technology Missouri Western State College 4525 Downs Drive St. Joseph, MO 64507 Abstract Programmable logic controllers, PLCs, have become the industry standard,replacing the hard-wired electromechanical devices, in controlling process machines anddriving the equipment of manufacturing. Varying in size and sophistication, theseelectronic devices are now
. Page 24.842.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 LabVIEW: A Teaching Tool for the Engineering CoursesAbstractComputer programming in languages such as Visual Basic, C++, or JAVA follow a control flowmodel of program execution. In the control flow model, the sequential order of program elementsdetermines the execution order of a program. A program written in LabVIEW uses a slightlydifferent approach compared to the conventional method known as dataflow programming.LabVIEW stands for Laboratory Virtual Instrument Engineering Workbench. This powerfulgraphical development system, developed by National Instruments (NI), is a widespread teachingtool and is used in many industries. LabVIEW can
Session 1566 Application-Centered Methodology for Teaching Programmable Logic Controllers Condoor, S.S. Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MissouriAbstractThe paper discusses the methodology used for teaching programmable logic controllers –a part of the Mechatronics curriculum. The goal of the curriculum is to nurture skills thatcan help in implementing a Mechatronics project from the functional specifications. Tothis end, we developed a teaching paradigm involving several modules each with sixidentical steps. In this teaching paradigm, students see: 1
Session 2468 Outcomes Assessment Inside the Classroom: Performance Oriented Teaching David S. Cottrell, P.E., Ph. D. United States Army Corps of EngineersAbstract This paper presents a methodology employed in an introductory mechanics ofmaterials course to quantify individual student mastery of learning objectives, to initiateadditional instruction as required, and to revalidate improved skills. This paper examines thefirst of four major blocks of instruction in an introductory mechanics of materials course as avehicle to demonstrate the tenets of performance
Session 2432 Teaching Three-Phase Power ... A Low-Voltage Approach Thad B. Welch ASEE/United States Air Force Academy Abstract Any electrical power systems course that includes demonstrations and/or laboratoryexercises would benefit from a low-voltage three-phase power supply. Providing a low-voltagethree-phase power supply allows classroom demonstrations and “hands-on” studentparticipation in laboratory exercises without the danger associated with a 240 VAC system.Faculty and student surveys indicate that students would benefit from a
395 Engineering 101: Peer Teaching with LEGO NXT Robotics Stephen Beck1, Joshua Brent1, Thomas Brown1, Agostino Cala1, Eniko T. Enikov2, Richard Lucio III1 1 Undergraduate Student Mentors; 2Faculty advisor Advanced Micro and Nano Systems Laboratory, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The University of ArizonaAbstractThe vast amount of knowledge and the multitude of disciplines encompassed by engineering canoften be intimidating and difficult, creating an educational barrier for beginning students. Thegoal of an
AC 2008-1342: TEACHING REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN WITHMATHCAD APPLICATIONNirmal Das, Georgia Southern University Nirmal K. Das is an associate professor of Civil Engineering Technology at Georgia Southern University. He received a Bachelor of Civil Engineering degree from Jadavpur University, India, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering (structures) from Texas Tech University. His areas of interest include structural analysis, structural reliability and wind engineering. Dr. Das is a registered professional engineer in Ohio and Georgia, and is a Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers
Paper ID #13167How We Teach: Transport Phenomena and Related CoursesDr. Daniel Lepek, The Cooper Union Dr. Daniel Lepek is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at The Cooper Union for the Ad- vancement of Science and Art. He received his Ph.D. from New Jersey Institute of Technology and B.E. from The Cooper Union, both in chemical engineering. In 2011, he received the ASEE Chemical Engineering Division ”Engineering Education” Mentoring Grant. His research interests include particle technology, transport phenomena, and engineering education. His current educational research is focused on peer instruction