literature revealed numerous and varying conceptions of what constitutedsystems thinking. However, very few instances were found in which authors depictedexpectations in terms that conformed to requirements for learning outcomes.Constructing a preliminary set of learning outcomes might advance conversations aboutexpanding the role of systems thinking in undergraduate engineering education. Aframework for learning outcomes was developed by combining the CDIO Syllabus29 withthe six levels of learning in the revised Bloom’s taxonomy40. Using this framework, theauthors developed a preliminary set of learning outcomes. It is the intent of the authors,that the set of learning outcomes will stimulate additional reflection and conversationabout how students
countries.To further emphasize this point, consider the following three quotes from, respectively, WilliamWulf, president of National Academy of Engineering; Duane Abata, president of ASEE, and KenKohrs, former vice president of Ford Motor Company: “…engineering is now practiced in a global, holistic business context, and engineers mustdesign under constraints that reflect that context. In the future, understanding other cultures,speaking other languages, and communicating with people from marketing and finance will bejust as fundamental to the practice of engineering as physics and calculus.”2 “Outsourcing is affecting engineering and all the facets that encompass engineering, includingresearch, design, marketing and service…This is a major
materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1 Rice, T. J. (2008). Riding out the waves: Community college transfers graduating with bachelor's degrees.Dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, ID.2 Dougherty, K. J. (1987). The effects of community colleges: Aid or hindrance to socioeconomic attainment?Sociology of Education, 60, 86-103.3 Smith, P. (2010). You can’t get there from here: Five ways to clear roadblocks for college transfer students.Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.4 Laanan, F. S. (2001). Transfer student adjustment. In New Directions for Community Colleges, 114, 5–13. San
. Special attention was paid todisconfirming evidence and outliers in data coding, as well as elements of frequency,extensiveness, and intensity within the data. Ideas or phenomena was initially identified andflagged to generate a listing of internally consistent, discrete categories, followed by fracturedand reassembled (axial coding) of categories by making connections between categories andsubcategories to reflect emerging themes and patterns (represented in Table 2). Categories werethen integrated to form grounded theory using selective categorization to clarify concepts andto allow for response interpretations, and conclusions associated with the students’ perceptionsof success of the “flipped” classroom. Frequency distribution of the coded
view a summary of the group‟s evaluations and to give them the option torevise, considering this feedback on group response and additional time for reflection, their ownindividual evaluations. This is consistent with the basic principles of the Delphi Method. The Round 2 questionnaire included the same topics as did Round 1, with the addition ofa group of six questions recommended for inclusion in the participant‟s Round 1 responses. Therequested participant input was to assign the achievement levels using Key Set #1 as follows:Level 1-Knowledge; Level 2-Comprehension; Level 3-Application; Level 4-Analysis; Level 5-Synthesis, and Level 6-Evaluation. The numbers ranging from 1 to 6 were assigned to the rank-ordered categories for the
: PjBL places emphasis on the application of knowledge over the learning of theory through one or more overarching projects. These projects often address real- world problems and are likely to have an interdisciplinary component and a group work orientation. To encourage student engagement in and ownership of the learning process, faculty act as guides, supporting acquisition of content knowledge and providing project scaffolding, while students exercise autonomy by carrying out independent open-ended projects. Students participating in projects create one or more significant tangible deliverables, often derived from the scaffolding provided by the faculty, but ultimately intended to reflect the
Page 23.599.9research experience. This finding is consistent with prior research about students’ motivationsfor undergraduate research,3,11,18,20,21 and is a reflection of students’ practical concerns aboutexploring options and preparing for future careers (whether in research, academia, or industry).The post-experience survey revisited several of these issues as part of a larger examination ofstudents overall impressions of the summer research experience. Students were asked to indicatetheir level of agreement with a series of value statements about the summer experience using afive-point Likert scale (Strongly Agree=1, Agree=2, Neutral=3, Disagree=4, StronglyDisagree=5). Table 7 summarizes students’ responses to these questions in the post
Page 23.705.2zero to three credit hours either required or optional depending on the university. Courserequirements range from optional (no bearing on degree requirements) to elective (mostlypass/fail) to mandatory in order to have access to the job posting database at the college oruniversity. Class sizes range from a seminar-sized group of around eight up to a lecture hallstyle group of about 100 per section, seemingly dependent on the staffing of the career centeritself or available faculty members qualified to teach the class. Formats vary just as much fromsmall weekly assignments to nearly daily assignments and end-of-term reflection papers. Someof the most often stated requirements are that students must create a resume and attend some
profession, AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Paper AC 2009-424, Austin, Texas.Paradis, J.G., and M.L. Zimmerman, 2002, The MIT Guide to Science and EngineeringCommunication, 2nd edn., MIT Press, 324 p.Robinson, C.M. and G.M. Blair, 1995, Writing Skills Training for Engineering Students inLarge Classes, Higher Education, v. 30, p. 99-114.Royal Academy of Engineering (UK), 2007a, Educating Engineers for the 21st Century.Royal Academy of Engineering (UK), 2007b, Creating Systems that Work: principles ofengineering systems for the 21st century.Schon, D.A., 1983, The Reflective Practitioner, Basic Books.Schon, D.A., 1990, Educating the Reflective Practitioner: toward a new design for teachingand learning in the professions
US institutions while others are atthe exploration stage.The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) is a growing movement in higher education.25 Page 23.734.7SoTL is scholarly inquiry into student learning which advances the practice of teaching bysharing this research publicly.26 Sharing the teaching style that an instructor finds useful in aclassroom is what makes it scholarship. SoTL builds on many past practices in higher education,including classroom and program assessment, the reflective practice movement, peer review ofteaching, traditional educational research, and faculty development efforts to enhance teachingand learning.In this
technological platforms. Focus on the students and their learning, emphasis on collaborative work, use of didactic techniques, enhance of the process by the use of digital technologies and use of computers favoring active student participation are goals that guide her work. As a member of Tecnol´ogicos faculty several awards had been granted by the institution on the acknowledgment of her teaching performance and research activities related to analyze and reflect on the educational process. She coauthored several textbooks for the learning of Pre-College Mathematics and Calculus. Recently the Textbook Series of Ap- plied Calculus has been published by Cengage Learning offering an innovative approach to the teaching and
) What are the Constraints of the challenge? (list) EXPANDED DESIGN CHALLENGE: Reword the design challenge to include the specifications and constraints. DESIGN PORTOFOLIO The design portfolio has several elements—challenge (including specifications and constraints), developing knowledge (knowledge and skill builder activities), creating alternative solutions (evaluating trade-‐offs and selecting the optimum solution), building and testing a prototype, evaluating the design and refining the design. There is also a reflection section and an extension section for students
alsoillustrates that students embrace changes in instructional approaches. Students’ comments,shown in the following, reflect their learning gains in areas of cognitive understanding, contents,and meta-cognition. … The problem solving was getting boring and not very helpful until we were Page 23.814.13 grouped into 'states' and put in competition against each other. Class was enjoyable again and it helps with understanding. I enjoyed this class and starting the understanding the concept behind motor design and uses. This class did offer good tools to learn and did help me with
responsibility. V. Lessons LearnedThis paper concludes with reflections on lessons that were learned over the last four years whileattempting to perfect our outreach, recruiting, and retention programs. a) Don’t Lecture - Engage!This simple piece of advice was found early in the implementation of our program in an onlinearticle by Seelman.8 We interpreted this statement as talk less and show more. The pupils willlikely not remember your words, but they will remember the interesting things you show them. b) Don’t Spam the PupilsThere is nothing more time consuming than written and verbal correspondence. After initiallyputting considerable efforts on these activities, we started to realize that there was little responseor evidence that it made much
can create online and Page 23.871.13dynamic course materials that can be updated easily and frequently as needed. The workpresented in this paper and the instruments described will also guide any systematic evaluation ofa pedagogical novelty on similar student learning outcomes.AcknowledgementThis material is supported by the National Science Foundation under TUES Phase-II Grantnumber 1022932. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendation presented are thoseof the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R., (2000). How people
and focused on attaining their degree for specific lifegoals. However the lack of difference amongst the groups when examining epistemologicalbeliefs illustrates the need for faculty to advance the students’ level of certainty, simplicity, andsource of knowledge and justification for knowing to be common across all students,independent of their academic level, age, or prior military experience.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University underthe Internal Grant. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Embry-RiddleAeronautical University.References1. Arnett, J.J. (2000
connected to infra-red drivers, andall network-node drivers were aimed at a reflective surface. Each network node also had aninfra-red receiver aimed at the same reflective surface. The infra-red receivers providedelectrical signals as receive-signal inputs to the nodes. Having wireless optical signals made theproject a bit more interesting to some students. However, the network-node implementationswere otherwise the same as they would have been with an electrical bus. It was decided that theadditional complexity and logistical difficulties in setting up the wireless optical networkoutweighed the positive aspects of having implemented a wireless network.Message transmission format: Each transmission for the message-exchange course
given the recent increase in nationwide outreachprograms designed to introduce women and racial/ethnic minorities to opportunities in STEMfields. However, the distribution of engineering degrees awarded across racial/ethnic groups isnot reflective of the current demographic shift in the United States. According to the U.S.Census Bureau, 14 out of 50 states in our country have already shifted to majority minoritypopulations with New Mexico, California, and Texas at the top of the list.7 Since 2005,Hispanics have exceeded more than 20 percent of students enrolled in the K-12 educationsystem,8 yet they earned only 10 percent of the engineering degrees awarded in 2007.9Racial/ethnic minorities continue to be an untapped pool of prospective STEM
. Page 24.106.5 4 1. Explore prior knowledge related to engineering and relationships between domains, 2. Develop basic knowledge of engineering, 3. Engage in cooperative engineering design activity, and 4. Reflect on activity as both learners and STEM educators (p.3).The only component Donna (2012) included that we did not was the formal development ofprofessional learning communities after PD concludes. While this took place informally in ourstudy due to the statewide AMSTI model, it was not a formal part of the design. Yoon, Diefes-Dux, and Strobel (2013) determined that engineering teacher professionaldevelopment
) > Thinking (N=14)** (MBTI; p = 0.114, MWp = .046)Machining Analysis Spring 32.41** Extrovert (N=10) > Introvert (N=8)* UoP 20 65.9 87.3 (MBTI; p = 0.034, MWp = .055)during Chip Formation 2013 (p < 0.001) Active (N=14) > Reflective
Page 24.138.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Adopting the BOK2 Student Outcomes: A Six Year RetrospectiveAbstractIn 2008, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) published the Civil Engineering Bodyof Knowledge, Second Edition (BOK2), reflecting ASCE’s vision of the skills and knowledgethe next generation of civil engineers must acquire. The Department of Civil Engineering atLawrence Technological University adopted the BOK2 that same year as part of its regularprogram review process. Faculty engaged in extensive debate on the prudence of adopting anew, more complex standard just two years before the ABET accreditation visit in 2010.However, the Department’s commitment to
product may not reflect student designs, owners anddesign engineers could benefit from student insights. This concept matches well with Cooley’s[6]second item listed previously. Page 23.314.5Further, although the concrete canoe and steel bridge are competitions defined and organizedoutside of a university, they are often considered to be extracurricular activities at a particularschool. For both the students and the advisors who participate in them, there is some level ofextra effort required. Houston[15] advocated that higher participation rates would result fromofficially crediting the work both students and faculty put in by incorporating the
to reflect a thermodynamics context. The items usedin the Phase 1 Survey are In order to prepare for thermodynamics class, I make enough time for doing the assigned homework problems. In order to prepare for thermodynamics class, I make enough time for doing the assigned readings.We re-evaluated all questions in light of current engineering education literature. For example,Litzinger posed that different cognitive and metacognitive strategies are used by students inproblem solving courses than in non-problem solving courses 36. Therefore, we eliminatedseveral questions in the SRLI that were not relevant in a problem solving course context whichalso helped keep the total length appropriate to avoid survey fatigue
effective approach to increasing applicability was toemploy real-life communication interaction scenarios—included for practice, reflection, andmodeling36, 37, 38, 39, 40. These scenarios were drawn from composites identified in CareerWISEfocus groups41, described earlier, which found the four major themes that affect attrition andpersistence decisions for graduate women in STEM: (1) advisor issues, (2) balance issuesbetween work and non-work life, (3) climate issues related to the STEM environment, and (4)delays and setbacks. These four major themes were then incorporated into the content andpresented as multidimensional (i.e., pertaining to more than one theme) self-tests and/or real-lifecommunication interaction scenarios. An example of a
. The 100m2 Laboratory incorporates areas for teaching and training, andstudent-centered learning activities were specifically designed to foster student exploration withreal-world hardware, machines, and physical systems. These activities promote “hands-on” and“minds-on” learning, and reflect the spirit of transformational learning that is a theme in theCollege of Engineering. The Laboratory is equipped with workbenches, tools, instruments, computers, data acquisi-tion systems, and an assortment of machines and mechanical systems to enhance creative explo-ration and investigation. The machines and systems include motorcycle engine assemblies(engines and transmissions), bicycles (including a chainless bicycle and a custom front-wheel-drive
citation theycollected, students learned to filter out irrelevant, out-of-date, unauthoritative, inaccurate, and biased Page 23.478.11information. What is significant for us as instructors of this course is that the quality of citations fromthe Open Web moved away from generic, encyclopedia-style sources (e.g. Wikipedia) to sourcesoriginating from professional entities (e.g. EPA) and scholarly publishers (PLOS.org.) This move onthe students’ part is attributable to the students’ awareness and appreciation of the evaluation criteria.The improvement in locating and using appropriate information sources also reflected on theirimprovement in
complete it. The shortsurvey consisted of several questions that gave some reflections of the students’ state of mindabout understanding lifelong learning competency. Page 23.479.6In the first question of the survey, students were asked to write their own definition of lifelonglearning, the sample consisted of 86 students in four different classes at the sophomore, juniorand senior levels. The responses were compared with the definition given by Candy3 repeatedhere for convenience, “equipping people with skills and competencies required to continue theirown self-education beyond the end of formal schooling”. 45
variables were collected throughout the four semesters using anunannounced exit survey administered online in the lab in the week following the GISlaboratory.Student PerformanceFive multiple-choice and fill-in-the-blank assessment items tested their recall of traffic safetyissues covered in the GIS laboratory. Students had no prior preparation associated with this test.Of these five assessment items, two were common for all semesters and three were equivalent indifficulty, but different for the stand-alone (first two semesters) and context-driven approach(last two semesters). This adjustment reflected the nature of the analyses required by the crash
students aboutentrepreneurship4,5, something that many of our faculty have been promoting to our students forthe last decade. Evidence shows that this new proposition is working as most of the studentsnow graduating from the Electronics Program take engineering jobs in the product and systemdevelopment sector, serving as applications engineers, product engineers, test engineers, andproject managers. With the change in how the program is presented to both new students and industry camean opportunity to overhaul the current curriculum and ensure that it optimally reflected a focus inproduct and system development. From a technical standpoint, the curriculum was very strong,emphasizing analog/digital electronics, power, embedded systems
quality that comes from much of thetext that is produced by students. This quality reflects a lack of flow in the wording, a conditionsimilar to reading a list that indicates no apparent connection among the various parts of the list.This lack of connection makes a reader quickly begin to wander, sometimes becoming lost inpersonal thoughts far from the actual text. The three items that may help improve all student text area focus on outlines, a review of simple paragraphing with topic sentences and supportinginformation, and an overview of the transitions that can be placed in a piece of writing to make thetext flow. These relatively easy elements in writing can make a great difference in the quality of astudent’s text.Another problem that is