(if their focus was on businessapplications). With the development of microprocessors in the 1960’s, the character of thelandscape began to change. Technology changed, creating demand for engineers whounderstood the hardware and electronics underlying the chips but also were conversant with andcapable of developing the software components of a system. It was not possible to adequatelytreat the topics needed for education of these engineers in the context of a specialization areawithin an electrical engineering program of study. The first computer engineering program wasaccredited by the EAC of ABET in 1971, and between about 1970 and 1990, computerengineering emerged as a separate discipline. The last decade of the twentieth century
and universities; panel reviewer for US DOE GAANN Fellowships (2009, 2010), NSF EEP (2005-08), and S-STEM (2008). Her assessment findings and evaluative works are reported in IEEE, presented in ASEE and FIE conference proceedings, and acknowledged in Mixed-Nuts on several different projects. Dr. Lee- Thomas also presented her evaluative work as a key component in an award-winning NPR radio broadcast ”Sounds of Progress” on The Women In Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics ON THE AIR! as part of a NSF funded project with Norfolk State University’s College of Science, Engineering and Technology.Autar Kaw, University of South Florida Autar K Kaw is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Jerome
-existing ideas may very well be an approach that can enthuse studentsto attain the goal of becoming future scientists, technologists, engineers, and mathematicians.i This material is based upon work supported by the Learning through Engineering Design and Practice, NationalScience Foundation Award# 0737616, Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings, under Page 22.1238.2Information Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) Youth-based Project. Opinions, findings,conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the
output (andforce them to examine the function of each statement in LINE1), student teams are thenchallenged to predict-then-verify LINE2’s output. The prediction portion generally elicits muchdiscussion, disagreement, and confusion, followed by many “aha’s” as students discover, realize,and explain to each other why the line tilts. When challenged to draw a “less steep line,” mostwill decrease the -increment to one and beam at their easy success.Their “concrete” actions of making dots appear steeper or less steep allows students to viscerallyexperience essential properties of linearity such as constant rate-of-change, which underlies the
creativity among students. Students’ learningoutcomes are assessed using KEEN-TTI assessment tools.AcknowledgmentsThe author wishes to express his sincere thanks to Kern Family Foundation for the initial grantduring 2007-09 and the expansion grant during 2009-11 to promote invention, innovation, andentrepreneurship in engineering education at MUSE.References[1] Sager, B., and Dowling, M. (2009). Strategic Marketing Planning for Opportunity Exploitation in Young Entrepreneurial companies. Int. Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Vol. 1, No, 1, pp. 88-107.[2] Shane S., and Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 217-226.[3] Kuratko, D. (1995
social-cognitive perspective,” Theory into Practice, 43 (3), 189-196.[6]. Cohn, M., User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development, Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004, Boston, MA 02116.[7]. Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., and Greathouse, S., (1998), “Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (1), 70-83.[8]. Eren, O., and Henderson, D. J., (2011), “Are we wasting our children's time by giving them more homework?” Economics of Education Review, 30 (5), 950-961.[9]. Ferreira, J., Sharp, H., and Robinson, H., (2011), “User experience design and agile development: Managing
of the factors. Several criteria exist to extract the number of factors underlying thedata: the point of inflexion of the curve in the scree plot31 and the number of eigenvalues greaterthan one32. Following Kaiser (1960)’s criteria32, we retained factors with eigenvalues greaterthan one. Thus, seven factors were considered for the possible number of factors of the TESS.Since a putative factor structure of the TESS is identified, the factor loadings of the items foreach factor were gauged to decide which items constitute which factors. Based on Stevens’(2002)33 guideline about the relationship between the sample size and cutoff factor loading, itemswith a factor loading greater than .40 were considered significant for the designated factor
Engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.[2] National Science Foundation. 2008. Science and engineering indicators 2008.http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08/c0/c0i.htm (last accessed, August 2008).[3] Nicholls, G., H. Wolfe, M. Besterfied-Sacre, L. Shuman, and S. Larpkiattaworn. 2007. A method for identifyingvariables for predicting STEM enrollment. Journal of Engineering Education 96 (1): 33–45.[4] Women’s Experiences in College Engineering (WECE). 2002. Cambridge, MA: Goodman Research Group, Inc.[5] Frehill, L. M., DiFabio, N. M., Hill, S. T., Traeger, K., & Buono, J. 2008. Review of the 2007 literature womenin engineering. SWE Magazine of the
and terminology in the graphics, text and presentation; words such as: typical, average, about, industry average, normalized, etc.; Juran23 provides “methods of summarizing data” which provides a technical transition from quantitative to qualitative data.IV. Specific Considerations‘Information structures,’ including Ulman and Gould’s reference to “other forms of visualpresentation(s)”46 need to be considered, and include: 1) working or assembly drawings; 2) schematic diagrams; 3) block diagram; 4) photographs; 5) exploded views; and 6) models (physical, CAD, or virtual).Other related information structures include: 7) flow diagrams and flowchartings (others) 8) force field
Idea: Adding Hands-on Design to an Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 193-199, Jul. 1996.8. Cooper, S. C., Miller, G. R., “A Suite of Computer-Based Tools for Teaching Mechanics of Materials,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, pp. 41-49, 1996. Page 6.156.15 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright Ó 2001, American Society for Engineering Education9. Crismond, D., Wilson,D.G., “Design and Evaluation of Multimedia Program: Assess MIT’s EDICS Program,” Proceeding of the ASEE Frontiers in Education Conference
Paper ID #41843A Comparison of Civil Engineering Curriculum and EAC-ABET Civil EngineeringProgram CriteriaDr. Matthew K Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He then went to obtain his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech followed by research work at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center on concrete bridges. He is currently a professor of civil engineering and the Jackson-Hope Chair in Engineering at VMI. He teaches
-Scale Study onthe Needs of Students with Disabilities in Engineering Courses,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual AnnualConference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual Conference: ASEE Conferences, Jul. 2021, p.36627. doi: 10.18260/1-2--36627.[2] S. Bellman, Sheryl Burgstahler, and Penny Hinke, “Academic Coaching: Outcomes from aPilot Group of Postsecondary STEM Students with Disabilities.” Journal of PostsecondaryEducation and Disability, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1066319[3] E. da S. Cardoso, Brian N. Phillips, Kerry Thompson, Derek Ruiz, Timothy N. Tansey, andFong Chan, “Experiences of Minority College Students with Disabilities in STEM.” Journal ofPostsecondary Education and Disability, 2016. [Online]. Available:https
. 2017. doi: 10.17226/24622.[4] D. H. Kinkel and S. E. Henke, “Impact of Undergraduate Research on Academic Performance, Educational Planning, and Career Development,” Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 194–201, 2006, doi: 10.2134/jnrlse2006.0194.[5] R. Taraban and E. Logue, “Academic factors that affect undergraduate research experiences,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 499–514, 2012, doi: 10.1037/a0026851.[6] S. Baron, P. Brown, T. Cumming, and M. Mengeling, “The Impact of Undergraduate Research and Student Characteristics on Student Success Metrics at an Urban, Minority Serving, Commuter, Public Institution,” Publications and Research, Apr. 2020
integral for teacher evaluations assessing or promoting inclusive − Change needs to be implemented teaching − Hearing students’ voices is inclusivityAttention to Social Dimensions of LearningOur first theme, Attention to Social Dimensions of Learning, addresses beliefs related tointerpersonal connections between students and faculty and the importance of student s feelingcared for by their instructors. Both students and faculty believe that when there is some kind ofmeaningful personal connection, learning
anchored in achievement but requires more than a checklist of academicaccomplishments. Understanding engineering course content and being able to apply thatknowledge in other contexts was the main priority for each student interviewed.Theme 4: Social Connections with Peers (supplement)Connie did not attribute engineering inspiration or motivation to family members, but rather toher peers. When asked about the most helpful resource for engineering students, she said, For me, the most helpful was the classmate[s] because seeing other people’s perspectives and also a lot of my classmates had internships already, and so, being able to talk to them like, hey, what is this like? What do you like about it? What do you not like
-safety-crisis/ [2] M. C. Staff. (2023). Pacemaker. Available: https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests- procedures/pacemaker/about/pac-20384689[3] A. R. GREEN et al., "Decision-Making Experiences of Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators," Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1061-1069, 2016.[4] M. Schoenfeld. Cardiac Pacemaker. Available: https://www.yalemedicine.org/conditions/cardiac- pacemaker[5] O. Aquilina, "A brief history of cardiac pacing," (in eng), Images Paediatr Cardiol, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 17-81, Apr 2006.[6] V. S. Mallela, V. Ilankumaran, and N. S. Rao, "Trends in cardiac pacemaker batteries," (in eng), Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 201-12
the UACI camp both summers.This platform enabled instructors to engage the camp participants in real-time, render the camp curriculaand facilitate hand-on activities collaboratively. Zoom offers a feature called “breakout rooms”, whichallows the host and co-host(s) of the meeting to form separate smaller groups within the meeting. Theinstructors and facilitators used this feature to provide assistance to students who exhibited difficultygrasping information and/or completing the hands-on activities. The Uhuru Academy (UA) instructors utilized Canva to deploy the STEM history lessons. Canvais an online design and publishing tool that enables users to create presentations, videos, posters, logos,social media posts, etc. All history
behind the remarkable success of the project.Ethical approvalEthical approval for this study was obtained from the University of Hong Kong, with HRECreference number EA230632.References[1] Chun Kit Chui, Norman C. Tien. “The Journey of Establishing and Operating an Innovation Center to Nurture Future Engineering Innovators,” 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2024.[2] Vöneky, S., Kellmeyer, P., Mueller, O., & Burgard, W. (Eds.). (2022). The Cambridge handbook of responsible artificial intelligence: interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge University Press.[3] UNESCO, C. “Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence.” (2021).[4] Hurlburt, G. (2023). What if ethics got in the way of generative ai?. IT
., "A Vision-Based Low-Cost Power Wheelchair Assistive Driving System for Smartphones," in 2022 IEEE 24th Int Conf on High Performance Computing & Communications; 8th Int Conf on Data Science & Systems; 20th Int Conf on Smart City; 8th Int Conf on Dependability in Sensor, Cloud & Big Data Systems & Application (HPCC/DSS/SmartCity/DependSys), 18-20 Dec. 2022 2022, pp. 1979-1986, doi: 10.1109/HPCC-DSS-SmartCity-DependSys57074.2022.00295.[5] S. Zhou, M. Xie, Y. Jin, F. Miao, and C. Ding, "An End-to-end Multi-task Object Detection using Embedded GPU in Autonomous Driving," in 2021 22nd International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), 7-9 April 2021 2021, pp. 122-128
recognized for her teaching, advising, service, and research and as an Exemplary Faculty Member for Excellence in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Supporting students’ success in the cybersecurity field: Accomplishments and lessons learned by the ACCESS projectAbstractThe NSF S-STEM funded project “Attracting and Cultivating Cybersecurity Experts andScholars through Scholarships” (ACCESS) has a goal to increase the number of high-achievingundergraduate students with demonstrated financial need who complete a degree in thecybersecurity field. This goal contributes towards addressing the huge unmet need forcybersecurity experts. This paper
, and N. Ruggeri, “Mentored discussions of teaching: An introductory teaching development program for future STEM Faculty,” Innovative Higher Education, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 237–254, Nov. 2015. doi:10.1007/s10755-015-9348-1[5] N. T. Buswell, “The purpose of a Phd in engineering: Where does teaching fit in?,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 83, Jan. 2021. doi:10.21061/see.8[6] R. M. Felder, “How students learn: Adapting teaching styles to learning styles,” Proceedings Frontiers in Education Conference, 1988. doi:10.1109/fie.1988.35029[7] N. S. Raj and V. G. Renumol, “A systematic literature review on adaptive content recommenders in personalized learning environments from 2015 to 2020,” Journal of
Development of Expertise,” 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.jee.org123[5] M. E. Beier, M. H. Kim, A. Saterbak, V. Leautaud, S. Bishnoi, and J. M. Gilberto, “The effect of authentic project-based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM,” J Res Sci Teach, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 3–23, 2019, doi: 10.1002/tea.21465.[6] A. L. Andersen, T. D. Brunoe, and K. Nielsen, “Engineering education in changeable and reconfigurable manufacturing: Using problem-based learning in a learning factory environment,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 81, pp. 7–12, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.002.[7] K. E. Cook, Y. L. Han, T. R. Shuman, and G. Mason, “Effects of integrating authentic engineering problem centered learning
, 2020.[5] J. S. Lamancusa, J. E. Jorgensen, and J. L. Zayas-Castro, “The Learning Factory—A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 103–112, 1997, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.1997.tb00272.x.[6] J. S. Lamancusa, P. State, L. Bldg, T. W. Simpson, P. State, and L. Bldg, “The Learning Factory – 10 Years of Impact at Penn State,” International Conference on Engineering Education, 2004.[7] K. Carley, “Content analysis,” 1990.[8] E. Hilton, M. Tomko, A. Murphy, R. Nagal, and J. Linsey, “Impacts on design self-efficacy for students choosing to participate in a university makerspace,” presented at the DS 89: Proceedings of The Fifth
include thisinformation in a subsequent version once the policies for aggregation and anonymization (ifapplicable) are applied to new data.Most of the instances of HIPs obtained from our student involvement tool were directly mappedto classes in our SSKG ontology. This information was provided directly by faculty and staffthrough the UTEP Engage tool. Fig. 3(b) shows the definition of the instanceSSKG:iLink_REU in Manchester Syntax. Relationships were also identified from the tabulardata provided, for example, faculty member(s) leading an initiative were linked to the initiativesthrough the property SSKG:isResponsibleFor. Fig. 3(c) shows the definition of theproperty SSKG:impacts. During the ontology design process, we observed that
International University (FIU). In the 2023-24 academic year, he was elected as the program chair and subsequently appointed interim chair of the American Society for Engineering Education’s student division. Before his tenure at FIU, Daniel worked in Dubai, the United Kingdom, and Nigeria, all in engineering and STEM/engineering education capacities.Dr. Bruk T Berhane, Florida International University Dr. Bruk T. Berhane received his bachelorˆa C™s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Maryland in 2003. He then completed a masterˆa C™s degree in engineering management at George Washington University in 2007. In 2016, he earned a PhMr. Joseph Ronald Sturgess, Florida International University Joseph
of Radical Kinship. Simon & Schuster, Nov. 14, 2017.[3] U.S. Department of Labor, “Engineering Competency Model,” 2017. [Online]. Available:http://www.careeronestop.org/CompetencyModel/competency-models/engineering.aspx. [Accessed: Jul.15, 2022].[4] G. Kremer, “Stacking the Deck for Student Success - Competency Card Deck. [Online]. Available:https://www.necessaryskillsnow.org/stackable-deck/cards.php, [Accessed: Jul. 15, 2022].[5] T. Rose and T. Flateby, “From College to Career Success,” Retrieved fromhttps://www.insidehighered.com/views/2022/07/15/employers-recent-grads-rate-their-skills-opinion onJul. 15, 2022.[6] S. Parrish, “The Difference Between Amateurs and Professionals,” Retrieved fromhttps://fs.blog/amateurs-professionals/, Jul
. J. Pharm. Educ., vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 127–137, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.5688/AJPE7113.[7] A. Navickis-Brasch et al., “Restoring Water, Culture, and Relationships: Using a Community-Based Participatory Research Methodology for Engineering Education,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, ASEE Conferences, 2014, pp. 24.1047.1-24.1047.15. doi: 10.18260/1-2--22980.[8] S. Coughlin, S. Smith, and M. Fernandez, “Overview of community-based participatory research,” in Handbook of community-based participatory research, 1st ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 1–10.[9] S. Secules, “On the importance of (white) humility: Epistemological decentering as a positional orientation toward
survey. However, existing researchsuggests that demographics items should be placed at the end of surveys due to their potential tocause stereotype threat for marginalized students [28]. For this reason, the demographics itemswere moved to be placed at the end of the survey.Survey AdministrationIn Spring 2023, the survey was administered to aerospace engineering undergraduate students atthe University of Colorado Boulder and the University of Michigan. Students were surveyed intwo classes where we were implementing macroethics lessons–a sophomore aerospace vehicledesign course at the University of Colorado Boulder and a senior space system design course atthe University of Michigan. Prior to the planned macroethics lesson(s), students enrolled
years.SyllabusImproving inclusivity and belonging in lab classes starts even before students come to theclassroom. How instructors organize classroom materials can signal to students the environmentthat the lab will create. Faculty can set the stage for an inclusive classroom by including syllabusstatement(s) and an instructor learning philosophy. These sections of the syllabus connectstudents with resources and make clear the instructor’s commitment to creating an inclusiveenvironment. When students come to class on the first day, spending time reviewing these itemsdemonstrates their importance to the class. If you have a syllabus quiz, including questions onthese items can also reinforce their importance to students.Syllabus statements can include a land grant