) 1 (N=23) 0 A A‐ B+ B B‐ C+ C C‐ D F Grade Figure 1: Course grade distribution.Figure 2 shows a chart of the average quiz scores for the course. The trendline in Figure 2 showsthat the average scores slightly decreased during the course. Table 2 shows how quiz-takingstudents performed both with and without the quiz option. The quiz option had a relatively smallbenefit for students (1.19%); approximately one third of the quiz-taking students had highercourse point totals when their course totals were calculated as a non-quiz option
] Available: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf[9] M. Soehren, “Lifecycle of a CLO,” in Learning Leaders Fieldbook, B. Concevitch, Ed., Saratoga Springs, NY: Masie Learning Consortium, 2009, 23-25. [online] https://masie.com/images/pdfs/LearningLeadersFieldbook-1.pdf[10] D. Ramellie, “Building world-class talent,” in Learning Leaders Fieldbook, B. Concevitch, Ed., Saratoga Springs, NY: Masie Learning Consortium, 2009, 26-30. [online] https://masie.com/images/pdfs/LearningLeadersFieldbook-1.pdf[11] T. Kelly and M. Radhakrishnan, “Unlocking the potential of learning management technology,” in Learning Leaders Fieldbook, B. Concevitch, Ed., Saratoga Springs, NY: Masie Learning
Comparative Analysis of Female and Male Asian, Black, Hispanic, Native American, and White Students,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 167–190, 2009.[4] B. E. Hughes, “Orientation Identity ‘ Managing by Not Managing ’: How Gay Engineering Students Manage Sexual Orientation Identity,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 385–401, 2017.[5] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas, “Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: the experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students,” Eng. Stud., vol. 3, no. 933165213, pp. 1–24, 2011.[6] H. Boone and A. Kirn, “First Generation Students ’ Engineering Belongingness First Generation Students ’ Engineering Belongingness,” presented at the 2017
2011-12 3 1 1 0 2 2012-13 3 4 1 1 0 2013-14 5 3 1 2 0 2014-15 5 1 1 4 1 2015-16 5 1 2 2 0 Grand Total 29 13 10 10 5Table Nine A and B: Student Success Measure Four: Transfer Major Graduation Rates:While Community College Transfers are the majority of the student enrollees for theBSIT program, their graduation rates are decreasing. (Source: CSUCI InstitutionalResearch Office) All
revisedinstrument of moral judgement,” J. Ed. Psych., vol. 91, pp. 644-659, Dec. 1999.[9] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. Kenny Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, A. D Mead, “Thedevelopment of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-baseddesign teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods,” in 121st ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014, [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/23130. [Accessed: Mar. 29, 2018].[10] J. Rest, S. J. Thoma, D. Navaez, M. J. Bebeau, “Alchemy and Beyond: Indexing theDefining Issues Test,” J. Ed. Psych., vol. 89, pp. 498-507, Feb. 1997.[11] Y. Dong, “Norms for DIT-2: from 2005 to 2009.” Center for the Study of EthicalDevelopment, U. Ala
wouldalso be helpful to administer the survey to a similar group of students who did not receive theintervention. Based on the lack of literature about the growth mindset in engineering curricula,this area of study has much potential.Appendix A: MINDSET SURVEYAttitudes about difficult classes and learning1. What have you heard about the difficulty of MSE 308? a. It’s really hard b. It’s kind of hard c. It’s not too hard d. It’s not hard at all2. What have you heard about the time commitment involved with MSE 308? a. It takes a ton of time b. It takes a lot of time c. It takes a moderate amount of time d. It is not too time intensive3. What else have you heard about MSE 308? (short answer)4. What are you expectations for your
. The thermocouples were arrangedat two different elevations (0.9 m and 1.8 m from ceiling) as shown in Figure1(a) andFigure 1(c). Figure 1(c) is a generic 3D model for the room showing the surrounding rooms,window and door locations, and the twelve thermocouples. The room was conditioned using theexisting building HVAC system and the temperature was controlled by a thermostat located onthe left side wall of the room. The hallway on the west side of the room was kept at highertemperature than the room temperature. The thermocouples were labelled for better analysis as Figure 1. Office used for experimental data collection (a) actual office with hanging thermocouples, (b) actual office with included equipment and furniture, (c
,” Review of educational Research, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 249-276, 1998. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS [12] A. M. Langan, C. P. Wheater, E. M. Shaw, B. J. Haines,This material is based upon work supported by a Miller Grant W. R. Cullen, J. C. Boyle, D. Penney, J. A. Oldekop, C. Ashcroft, and L. Lockey, “Peer Assessment of Oralfrom Iowa State University. Presentations: Effects of Student Gender, University
thequestions and maps specific design representations to the rows and columns. Each of therepresentations is briefly discussed and some of the failed attempts in earlier versions of thecanvas are disclosed along with the reasons they did not work in the authors’ capstone courses. A B C D E Design Are we Why should Does our (still) able Choices we build it How What system to build it System
exciting activities. The pictures of the schools we have visited and the children, withdemonstrations and activities focus on explaining the consent, doing the activities it spreads awareness of STEMengineering process, design, and methodology. The main in the elementary level education system.goal of these activities is to introduce both boys and girlsinto engineering and eliminate the preconceived notions of B. A Typical Engineers on Wheels Tripthe difficulties encountered within engineering. In hopes thatsome of the young students will see that a career in In order for a visit to be successful, the Engineers onengineering can be obtained by anyone with an interest and Wheels
controversialtopics surrounding engineering innovation with the class as a whole. Figures 2-4 show some ofthese activities. Figure 2 shows a design thinking exercise that illustrates the difference inworking harder and working smarter. Students are instructed to design a way to get an objectfrom point A to point B where there is a barrier between. Most start by building a bridge orcatapult while going around is a simply feasible alternative. As seen in Figure 3, whendiscussing the differences between incremental, breakthrough, and disruptive innovations,lighting is used as an example to highlight these differences. To expand on the topic, studentsbuild an electrical circuit to compare the brightness and voltage drops across incandescent andled bulbs. Figure
Engineering Education, 91(1):81–87, 2002. [7] H. Hodge, S.H. Hinton, and M. Lightner. Virtual circuit laboratory. ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1):507–511, 2001. [8] C. Lemckert and J. Florance. Real-time internet mediated laboratory experiments for distance education students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1):99–103, 2002. [9] Z. Merchanta, E.T. Goetz, L. Cifuentes, W. Keeney-Kennicutt, and T.J.Davisa. Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in k-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 70:29–40, 2014.[10] S. Chatterjee, A. Mohanty, and B. Bhattcharya. On the exploration of game-based learning in stem education with the development and
language (Newly revised and edited by Alex Kozulin). Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 4. Alexander, P. A. (1996). The past, present, and future of knowledge research: A reexamination of the role of knowledge in learning and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 89-92. 5. Bransford, J., Vye, N., Stevens, R., Kuhl, P., Schwartz, D., Bell, P., ... & Roschelle, J. (2006). Learning theories and education: Toward a decade of synergy. Handbook of educational psychology, 2, 209-244. 6. Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. Handbook of child psychology: Volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language. Damon, William (Ed)., (pp. 679-744). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons
multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom.," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 424-436, 1993.[14] E. A. Geist and M. King, "Different, Not Better: Gender Differences in Mathematics Learning and Achievement," Journal of Instructional Psychology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 43-52, 2008.[15] D. F. Halpern, "A Cognitive-Process Taxonomy for Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities," Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 13, pp. 135-139, 2004.[16] U. Kessels and B. Hannover, "When being a girl matters less: Accessibility of gender-related self-knowledge in single-sex and coeducational classes and its impact on students' physics- related self-concept of ability," British Journal of
, pp. 22.109.1-16.[4] A. Szmerekovsky, B. Self, “Using Just-in-Time Teaching in Dynamics and in Mechanics ofMaterials”, 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, ASEE 2006, Chicago, IL, USA, June18-21, 2006, pp. 11.1392.1-14.
. References [1] D. Crismond and R. Adams, “The informed design teaching and learning matrix”, Journal of Engineering Education , vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 738797, 2012. [2] D. Crismond, “Scaffolding strategies for integrating engineering design and scientific inquiry in projectbased learning environments,” in Fostering human development through Engineering and Technology Education , pp. 235255, SensePublishers, 2011. [3] M. Ford, “Educational Implications of Choosing “Practice” to Describe Science in the Next Generation Science Standards”, Science Education , vol. 99 , no. 6, pp. 10411048, 2015. [4] L. Berland, C. Schwarz, C. Krist, L. Kenyon, A. Lo and B. Reiser, “Epistemologies in practice: Making
. Pollock, and N. Finkelstein, “A Physics Department’s Role in Preparing Physics Teachers: The Colorado Learning Assistant Model,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 78, pp. 1218, 2010.[18] S. Hauk, N. M. Speer, D. Kung, J. J. Tsay, and E. Hsu, (Eds.) “Video Cases For College Mathematics Instructor Professional Development,” 2013. [Online]. Available: http://collegemathvideocases.org[19] D. M. Gilbuena, B. U. Sherrett, E. S. Gummer, A. B. Champagne, and M. D. Koretsky, “Feedback on Professional Skills as Enculturation into Communities of Practice,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 104, pp. 7, 2015.[20] K. Durkin, “The Self-Explanation Effect when Learning Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis,” Society for Research on
. 12Noonan, Ryan. Office of the Chief Economist, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. (March 30, 2017). STEM Jobs: 2017 Update (ESA Issue Brief # 02-17). Retrieved from http://www.esa.gov/reports/stem-jobs-2017-update.Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students (Vol. 2). K. A. Feldman (Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Reed, K. E., Aiello, D. P., Barton, L. F., Gould, S. L., McCain, K. S., & Richardson, J. M. (2016). Integrating Leadership Development Throughout the Undergraduate Science Curriculum. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(5), 51.Siefert, T.A., Gillig, B., Hanson, J.M., Pascarella, E.T., & Blaich, C.F. (2014). The
. & Koedinger, K. R. An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cogn. Sci. 26, 147–179 (2002).11. Olsen, J. K. et al. Authoring collaborative intelligent tutoring systems. CEUR Workshop Proc. 1009, 1–10 2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Spring Conference, April 6-7, 2018 – University of the District of Columbia (2013).12. Woolf, B. & McDonald, D. D. BUILDING A COMPUTER TUTOR: DESIGN ISSUES. Computer (Long. Beach. Calif). 17, (1984).13. Arroyo, I. et al. A multimedia adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition and affect. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 24, 387–426 (2014).14. Blair-Early, A. &
manufacturing. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018, American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 406Bibliography[1] Robotics; an internet for robots. (2013). Telecommunications Weekly, 886.[2] International Federation of Robotics, Retrieved from http://www.ifr.org.[3] Esmaeilian B, Behdad S, Wang B. (2016). The evolution and future of manufacturing: a review. J Manuf Syst;39:79–100.[4] Paris, H., & Mandil, G. (2017). Process planning for combined additive and subtractive manufacturingtechnologies in a remanufacturing context. Journal of Manufacturing
Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[11] K. Bohle Carbonell, R. E. Stalmeijer, K. D. Könings, M. Segers, and J. J. G. van Merriënboer, “How experts deal with novel situations: A review of adaptive expertise,” Educational Research Review, vol. 12, pp. 14-29, 2014.[12] G. Hatano and K. Inagaki, “Two courses of expertise,” in Child Development and Education in Japan, H. W. Stevenson, H. Azuma, and K. Hakuta, Eds., ed New York: W.H. Freeman & Co., 1986, pp. 263-272.[13] B. van der Heijden, “Prerequisites to guarantee life-long employability,” Personnel Review, vol. 31, pp. 44-61, 2002.[14] E. M. Smith, J. K. Ford, and S. W. J. Kozlowski, “Building adaptive expertise: Implications
, Discuss the pros and cons of alternative technical solutions, and Debate possible evolutionary paths for the standard being analyzed.We propose six learning stages with specific learning objective in each stage. These aredescribed in continuation.3.1 ContextThe student needs to get familiar with the standard and the standardization mechanics. Theinstructor thus provides a) A high-level description of the standard with certain details, describing theoretical concepts and employed technologies, identifying relevant working parameters and expected system behaviors, b) The standard specifications and the relationships among the main and auxiliary documents, and c) The introduction to the software framework to be used
Paper ID #22268The ’Structured’ Engineering Design Notebook: A New Tool for Design Think-ing within a Studio Design CourseMs. Kristen Clapper Bergsman, University of Washington Kristen Clapper Bergsman is the Engineering Education Research Manager at the Center for Sensorimo- tor Neural Engineering at the University of Washington, where she is also a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in Learning Sciences and Human Development. Previously, Kristen worked as an ed- ucational consultant offering support in curriculum design and publication. She received her M.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction (Science Education
some reasoned thoughts. Preparation should end up with a sound, well-supported analysis of the situation and a sound, defensible set of recommendations about which managerial actions need to be taken. b. Participating in Class Discussion of a Case - A classroom environment, calls for one’s sizing-up of the situation, analysis, actions recommended, and why they are recommended. As the class discussion unfolds, fellow classmates may say some insightful things that were not thought of by everyone. Often the comments of others in the class would expand one’s own thinking about the case. c. Preparing a Written Case Analysis - The expectation is (a) identification of all the pertinent issues that
within the department used these definitions: a. “Outcome b. is an ability to select and apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to engineering technology problems that require the application of principles and applied procedures or methodologies. b. Outcome j. is a knowledge of the impact of engineering technology solutions in a societal and global context [2].”Course objectives were met by partially by the completion of 21 laboratory projects: 1) Engine stand identification and conformity 2) Magneto overhaul 3) Comparative life costs for magnetos 4) Starting vibrator and fault diagnosis exercise 5
implementation of these activities instead of the standardized curriculumguides or documents. Experiential learning allows students to create knowledge “throughthe transformation of experience” [12]. In this case, the experience would be a designactivity involving IoT and 3D printing.This teacher workshop is part of a broader National Science Foundation InnovativeTechnology Experiences for Students and Teachers. These projects are funded withproceeds of the H1-B visa program and attempt to promote STEM interest. This paperdetails the professional development workshop instruction, the instruments used toevaluate the understanding and interest in STEM among the participating teachers, anadditional survey, and the post workshop support that the teachers
/132368362/a-chemical-conundrum-how-dangerousis-dioxin[22] K. Eschner, “How Agent Orange turned this American small town into a toxic waste-ridden deathtrap,”Smithsonian. April 3, 2017. [Online]. Available: www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/times-beach-wasfounded-newspaper-promo-demolished-toxic-waste-ridden-ghost-town-180962693/[23] T. B. Wheeler, “The little river town dioxin killed,” The Baltimore Sun. Nov. 13, 1996. [Online]. Available:articles.baltimoresun.com/1995-11-13/news199663180081_dioxin-times-beach-eastern-missouri[24] “Federal buyout of Times Beach, MO., begins,” The New York Times. Sept. 7, 1983. [Online]. Available:www.nytimes.com/1983/...buyout-of-times-beach-mo-begins.html[25] “Dioxin-laced Times Beach folds,” United Press
surveys,documentation, and reflections papers to address: a) What cultural resources were used bystudents to obtain community-centric and project-centric information? b) What culturalinformation was obtained and how useful was this information for the project design andunderstanding the community? and c) How were students impacted by the Learning Outcomes?A brief discussion of future plans for strengthening the GEO course will also be presented.Surveys, Documentation, and Reflection Papers.Surveys were developed in collaboration with faculty and students in the Department ofSociology at Brigham Young University. The surveys were administered using the Qualtricssoftware and included free-response questions, multiple-choice questions, rank order
J. McGourty, "Engineering Faculty Development: A Multicoalition Perspective," in Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, St. Louis, MO, 2000.[6] C. Bonwell and J. Eison, "Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom," ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No.1, Washington, DC, 1991.[7] B. Smith and J. MacGregor, "What is Collaborative Learning?," in Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education, University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, 1992, pp. 9-22.[8] B. Millis and J. P. Cottell, "Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty," ORYX Press, 1998.[9] A. Kwan, "Problem Based Learning," in The Routledge International Handbook of
, our design could maintainthe structural integrity that we desired so that a person can safely ride our bike and brake usingRE-Brake.Although we accomplished most of our goals as we progressed further into our project, uponfurther examination we realized that RE-Brake could be greatly improved. Although our RE-Brakesystem worked for us, it lacked portability and was not interchangeable between bikes. Wedesigned RE-Brake specifically for our bike and all the measurements that we took matched ourdesign and layout, however, our next goal would be to make RE-Brake more modular and to haveit easily fit on various bikes and models.Once the RE-Brake system was attached to the bike [Figure 2a-b], three different tests were run.The first test was