degrees? ShouldABET then require service as an accreditation criteria?In this short paper, service in professional codes of conduct are explored, a case study is made ofthe opinions of beginning engineering students as well as students at all levels who have beeninvolved with service-learning projects in several courses, and the implications are considered.Service and professional societiesEngineering professional societies as well as the societies of other professions, such as theAmerican Bar Association, expect community service in their codes of ethics and conduct, as forexample, the following:NSPE (National Society of Professional Engineers) code of ethics III. Fundamental Canons
access to a faculty member through their design course atleast once per week. Part of the two-hour design course lab time is relatively unstructured so thatstudents can have the opportunity to seek advice on the curriculum, career counseling, or anyother matter of interest to them. These courses allow the faculty access to all of the students inour department, providing an effective means to make announcements or discuss issuespertaining to the whole student body. Design courses also provide a platform for professionalcommunication throughout the curriculum5, and a relevant structure to discuss other professionaltopics such as intellectual property, professionalism, engineering ethics, and the need for lifelonglearning. Some of these topics are
course deliverables. Deliverablesinclude: final working product (hardware, source code, and binaries), research paper (completedindividually), time logs (completed individually), system requirements specification, systemdesign specification, project plan, design review presentation, socio-economic impact statement,ethical impact study, test document, traceability matrix, test logs, user manual, and finalpresentation.Literature Survey: Competition-based Capstone ProjectsCompetition-based capstones are not uncommon as was found from a literature survey. In aconference paper by Paulik and Krishnan4, they discuss the use of competitions for capstonedesign courses at the University of Detroit, Mercy’s department of Electrical and ComputerEngineering
skills that are desired in a competitive jobmarket.We have created a curriculum that couples a series of foundation courses in science andtechnology with complimentary courses in business/entrepreneurship, energy/environmentalsciences and technology ethics. Students also have the opportunity to take specialized courses inInformation Systems Technology or Biotechnology tracks during their senior year. Figure 1represents a comparison view of a traditional academic program versus a more multidisciplinaryapproach to a technical education.(A) (B) Biology Engineering Science
/interpersonal skills”). • Each document includes capabilities related to what we classify as “social analytic skills,” such as ethical reasoning, understanding of global and local contexts, or political awareness.As our main interests are how a) “the social” and b) the relation between “the social” and “thetechnical” are represented, our attention now shifts to an assessment of how these features aremanifest in the accreditation documents. For the most part, professional/interpersonal skills areconceptually straightforward in the accreditation documents, and there is agreement that goodcommunication and teamwork skills are core competencies for engineers (even if the attributesof these skills are less-clearly specified). While we acknowledge
in daily operations. No matter the discipline,scope, nor delivery method, to effectively manage construction projects, the project managermust have a definable set of key competencies that facilitate his/her ability to effectively leadadministrative personnel, supervisors, foremen, skilled and non-skilled labor, subcontractors,and suppliers by applying learned skills, knowledge, values, ethics, and characteristics1. Akey competency is the knowledge, trait, skill, motive, attitude, value or other personalcharacteristic essential in performing a job2. A key competency can be a hard skill, where atechnical ability or proficiency is needed, or soft skills that focus on the interpersonalrelationships and workplace productivity3.In a study
) outcomes. Accordingly, the instrument is directlyaligned to engineering ”soft skills” that are often difficult to measure via individual course examsand projects. The EGPI is not a student survey of perception of their learning; rather, it is a directmeasure of how prepared students are for global workforces in areas of communication,professional ethical responsibility, understanding of global issues and lifelong learning.Subscales for the index were developed accordingly, while also aligning with sound theoreticaland empirical research on global citizenry9, 10 and the National Academy’s expectations forglobal preparedness. The following four subscales are utilized as metrics in the engineeringglobal preparedness index (EGPI). These metrics are
which offers an array of courses which address theinterface between technology and society, technical writing and oral presentation, as well asengineering ethics. We have found that teaching gender issues is very effective when coupledwith the teaching of ethics and values of professionals. In this paper, I discuss the specificmaterials, methods and basic philosophy of teaching that are effective in teaching issues ofgender.My course, TCC 211, "Values of Professionals," explores the value framework, the "calling" ofvarious professions, including engineering. To help students understand how one establishes thevalues for a particular profession, we talk about applied ethics and about what we consider rightand wrong behavior both on the job and in
ethically compelling alternative to the competitive model ofindividualized achievement and assessment, the notion of collaborative teaching unnerves manyof us because it implies a loss of professional autonomy–and, indeed, may suggest (to ourcolleagues, at least) that we’re not up to the task of doing our own pedagogical thing.Likewise, while we may regard cooperative learning as good preparation for the real world ofworking in teams, collaborative teaching may well seem naively oblivious of the real-worldacademic promotion-and-tenure system that judges us on our individual teaching (and scholarly)merits. Finally, if cooperative learning offers practical benefits to us as teachers in reducing thenumber (and improving the quality) of assignments we
a vital and visible connection to their professional association.Needles to say that, an intimate familiarity with the Code of Ethics can help facultymembers to maintain the highest ethical standards and allow them to act as rolemodels for students. It is important to integrate the Code of Ethics into course work,where appropriate. This will help in to inculcate ethical thinking of the students.Finally, high standards of research are vital component of to the professional lives ofengineering faculty members and graduate students in a university setting.Engineering research advances the state of engineering practice, provides valuablelearning and experience to graduate students and generates needed revenue forteaching institutions. Besides
design projectcourse. In this case, students worked remotely in teams. In some case the students (teammembers) lived as far as 200 miles apart from each other.6. Ethics: The Engineering Criteria 2000 of the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) pledge to significantly and rigorously improve the landscape of engineeringeducation in the United States. One outcome of Criteria 2000 is increased attention in thecurriculum to the ethical responsibilities of engineers. This is certainly a concern among manyfaculties including those teaching courses in online learning environments. The focus is toachieve meaningful ethics education for all engineering students, with particular emphasis oncompeting curriculum models.Our enduring
Confucian cultural roots, also noted for Koreans’ general respectfor education as evidenced by the yearly statistics that over 70% of highschool graduates enroll in colleges. Although it may seem apparent–withthe coupling yearly statistics that about 23% outright majority of the college population major inengineering—that Republic of Korea is on smooth sail with respect to its engineering evolution,there are—due to threats pertaining to changes in industrial structure, culture, economy, politics,education, environment and social structures (and, ultimately, people’s psyche, work-ethics andliving styles)—some alarming early signals pertaining to the numbers, quality and sustainabilitypertaining to its engineering workforce. In this presentation
Page 15.773.2broader context of sustainability requires engineers, and by extension engineering students, tomove beyond traditional technical expertise, and incorporate complex aspects of political, social,economic, and environmental systems into engineering design.Within this broad framework, sustainability clearly moves beyond environmental engineeringand becomes a concern for all disciplines of engineering. Several professional disciplinarysocieties have recognized the importance of sustainability or sustainable development to theirfield by including them in their Codes of Ethics or similar policy statements. The AmericanSociety of Civil Engineers includes in the first “fundamental canon” of the Code of Ethics thatengineers “shall strive to
, American Society for Engineering Education”Course requirements include three assignments to cover the following topics: (1)Professional, ethical, and social responsibilities; (2) Recognizing the need for, and anability to engage in lifelong learning; and (3) Recognizing the need for timeliness,quality, and continuous improvement. These assignments consist of having students readhandouts, perform library and Internet searches, and submit two-page reports thatdemonstrates their understanding of these issues. Week Number Topics and Activities Course requirements 1 Life long learning Professional, ethical, and social responsibilities
common design seminar and in effortsto encourage development of multidisciplinary design teams.The primary result of this effort was the initiation of a senior design seminar2. Thecatalog description for the course was posed as: “Elements of Professional EngineeringPractice. Professionalism, licensing, ethics and ethical issues, intellectual property,contracts, liability, risk, reliability and safety, interdisciplinary teams and team tools, therole of codes, standards and professional organizations, career, entrepreneurship, humanfactors and industrial design.” The stated intent of the seminar was “… thedevelopment of design skills through lectures about elements of the design process. Thiscourse will include seminars on: professionalism
Co-PI on the NSF ethics in education grant ”Gaming Against Plagiarism” and was a member of the NIH VIVO Collaboration.Michelle Leonard, University of Florida Michelle Leonard received her master’s of arts (M.A.) and master’s of Library Science (MLS) degrees from Kent State University, and has worked in both corporate and academic environments. She is an asso- ciate university librarian in the Marston Science Library at the University of Florida where she manages collections in the agriculture and life sciences. Michelle regularly teaches workshops for science grad- uate students, post docs and faculty on responsible conduct of research, including plagiarism, and data management. Her current research interests
coursesnot only enhance students' knowledge in the energy domain but may also raise awareness aboutthe growing demand for energy. The focus of instruction is often on engineering design, analysis,and technical problem-solving, with less emphasis on dealing with sustainability and other globalissues. Also, students who opt for other electives within the electrical engineering major may notget effectively exposed to the energy crisis or its environmental impact and the need forsustainable solution.Ethics education in engineering curricula at many universities is typically delivered througheither a standalone ethics course or by integrating it into "bookend" courses, such asIntroduction to Engineering and senior-level Capstone courses. Often, selected
].The codes mostly fell under one of two main categories: positive comments and negative comments.Table 2 below provides a list of the codes that fell under each category, as well as an example commentfor each one. Table 2: Different Categories of Student Responses with Examples for Each One EXAMPLE POSITIVE COMMENTS About teammate's work, work “He was very good about getting the most out of everyone. Very ethic, and/or personality committed to creating a good product for every assignment.” “I feel that the work has been evenly and fairly distributed across About entire team's work
International Humanitarian Trips: Objectionable or Estimable? Katherine Abrey, Maddy Cronin, Deanna Malone, and Libby (Elizabeth) Osgood Faculty of Sustainable Design Engineering, University of Prince Edward IslandAbstractThe ethical considerations surrounding student international humanitarian trips are complex. Thisarticle considers the benefits and drawbacks of such trips by examining existing literature anddiscussing personal experiences. The positive aspects of these trips for communities includeessential work being accomplished, economic support, and job creation for support staff. Thebenefits for students include professional, personal, and technical growth, global awareness,research opportunities, leadership
or weaken that behaviour. p. 108-114.The federal government, for example, can increase funding to [3] Arnett, D.B., S.D. German, and D.H. Shelby, Thecancer research and enact policies that help support the Identity Salience Model of Relationship Marketingmessage of the campaign i.e. non-smoking during pregnancy. Success: The Case of Nonprofit Marketing. Journal ofThis is one of the reasons why social campaigners should Marketing, 2003. 67(2): p. 89-105.endeavor to reach the ears and capture the hearts of [4] Brenkert, G.G., Ethical Challenges of Sociallawmakers! Marketing. Journal of
Paper ID #37314Diverse Perspectives, Engineering in Context, andExperiential Learning in Engineering EducationLauren Kuryloski (Assistant Professor of Teaching) Lauren Kuryloski is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She teaches Technical Communication courses at both the undergraduate and graduate level.Amy Baird Amy Baird is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She teaches STEM Communications and Ethics in Engineering and Computing to undergraduate engineering and
Paper ID #29814Designing for a Sustainable World: Integrating the United NationsSustainable Development Goals into a First-Year Engineering Course inScience, Technology and SocietyDr. Benjamin J. Laugelli, University of Virginia Dr. Laugelli is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He teaches courses that explore social and ethical aspects of engineering design and practice, including Sci- ence, Technology, and Contemporary Issues; Technology and the Frankenstein Myth; The LEGO Course: Engineering Design and Values; STS and Engineering Practice; and The Engineer, Ethics, and Profes
the follow-up question, why do engineers solve problems?is not as frequently communicated. Engineers solve problems for the benefit of society. Evidencefor this role is seen within the National Society of Professional Engineer’s code of ethicscannons and rules of practice, the first of which is “Engineers shall hold paramount the safety,health, and welfare of the public [1].” While not every engineer will be providing individualizedproblem solutions, i.e. care, the discipline of engineering is intended to provide solutions andcare to society. Engineers are societal caregivers. The problems engineers are called on to solve, are complex, not just from anintellectually rigorous perspective, but also from the myriad of societal, ethical
Paper ID #20044The Use of Narrative in Undergraduate Engineering EducationDr. Gary P. Halada, Stony Brook University Dr. Halada, Associate Professor in Materials Science and Engineering at Stony Brook University, directs an interdisciplinary undergraduate degree program in Engineering Science. He designs educational ma- terials focused on nanotechnology, advanced manufacturing, and how engineers learn from engineering disasters and how failure and risk analysis can be used to teach about ethics and societal implications of emerging technologies. Halada also coordinates the Long Island Alternative Energy Consortium, a
the ABET GeneralCriterion 3: Student Outcomes, General Criterion 5: Curriculum, and the Program Criteria forCivil and Similarly Named Engineering Programs (CEPC). The comparisons are provided inTables 1 through 21. For those outcomes that include both the cognitive domain and theaffective domain (Tables 15 Sustainability through 21 Ethical Responsibilities), both of theoutcome statements are provided in the table. Following each table is a discussion of theCEBOK3 outcome and the relevant ABET accreditation criteria, along with a recommendationfor “closing the gap” when it is determined that the ABET criteria only partially addresses ordoes not address the CEBOK3 outcome. It should be noted that the comparisons, ratings, andrecommendations are
Session 2330 Eight-Dimensional Methodology for Innovative Thinking About the Case and Ethics of the Mount Graham, Large Binocular Telescope Project Submitted by:Rosalyn W. Berne, Division of Technology, Culture and Communication,University of Virginia, 351 McCormick Road, Thornton Road, Charlottesville, Va. 22904.434-924-6098. rwb@virginia.eduAnd,Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University, Electrical Engineering Department, FloridaAtlantic University, Boca Raton Florida, 33431. 561-297-2773. ravivd@fau.eduAbstract Case analysis is a common method for
education. A second set of challenges has interrogated the contents of the engineering sciences and engineering design. Social philosophers have long mapped engineers as technological intelligentsia whose success depends upon a wide range of social, ethical, and epistemological criteria (Goldman 1984; Lenk 1984; Davis 1996). Micro-‐ethicists have made visible contrasts between formal codes and actual practices (Baum and Flores 1982; Martin and Schinzinger 1983). More recently, macro-‐ethicists make visible a range of broader material projects that engineering formation and engineering work could serve or, in some cases, does serve (Herkert 2009
AC 2010-1756: SPECIAL SESSION: NEXT GENERATION PROBLEM-SOLVING:RESULTS TO DATE - MODELS AND MODELING USING MEASLarry Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academics and Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering educational experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former senior editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Dr. Shuman is the founding editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in the engineering education literature, and is co-author
competencies. ABET, the European Network forEngineering Education (ENAEE), and the Federation of Engineering Institutions in Asia and thePacific (FEIAP) highlight the need for engineers to recognize and account for the impacts ofengineering practice and design in broad contexts that impact human and environmentalconditions throughout their guidelines. ABET (2021) mandates that engineering graduates have“an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs withconsideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social,environmental, and economic factors,” and “an ability to recognize ethical and professionalresponsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must
apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration ofpublic health, safety, and welfare as well as global, cultural, social, and environmental, andeconomic factors” [2]. Outcome 4 is the “ability to recognize ethical and professionalresponsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgements, which must considerthe impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts”[2]. Although public policy isn’t directly stated in the outcomes, the need to incorporate multi-disciplinary issues and the cause and effect of engineering decisions and solutions on othersystems is evident. Although there is consensus that humanities and social sciences topics such as