mirrors was calculated to ensure that none of the mirrors detachwhenever the disc is rotated at a high speed. The centrifugal force was calculated in thefollowing process.The angular to linear velocity formula is ω 𝑣E 𝑣E = 𝑟×𝜔, (9a)wherevt = Linear velocity in m/s rr = Radius in meterω = Angular velocity in rad/s.The revolution per minute (RPM) to Equation (9a) is𝑣E = 𝑟×𝑅𝑃𝑀× *K (9b) Figure 10: Linear Velocity LM
and the outcomes of suchopportunities help prepare the future professionals of the construction industry.References1 Wandahl, S. & Ussing, L. F. (2016). Facilitating Industrial Placement in the Construction Engineering Curriculum.Construction Research Congress.2 Weber, S.L. (1998). Field Internships for Construction Studies: A Survey. ASC Proceedings of the 34th AnnualConference Central Connecticut State University- New Britain, Connecticut, April 15 - 18, 1998.3 Chapin, T., Roudenbush, W., & Krone, S. (2003). Cooperative education in the Associated Schools ofConstruction. Journal of Construction Education, 56-68.4 Rondinelli, D.F., Allen, S. Y. and Hauck, A. J. (2000). Impact of Structured Internship Programs on StudentPerformance in
devices, an optional 4-day course on engineering of musicalinstruments, and an opportunity for students to get together and speak about their experiencesthrough guided storytelling. We will report on the results of these programs at a later date.BibliographyASEE (2014). Going the Distance: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering,Engineering Technology, and Computing Students. https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles.Alon, S. (2005). Model mis-specification in assessing the impact of financial aid on academicoutcomes. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 109–125.Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2005). Assessing the “mismatch” hypothesis: Differences in collegegraduation rates by institutional
where the student explains how s/he solved the problem. To answer thissection, we ask the students to imagine that they are trying to explain what they did to their boss,what the problem was, and how it was solved. Students should assume that their boss knowsabout computer hardware and the current subject. Thus, they should use the correct language andthe right terminology. Some labs ask the students to write a procedure to solve the problem theysolved, assuming that the procedure would become part of the company’s documentation andtraining for other technicians. Some labs require collecting data from the conducted experiment.Students most format the data in tables and charts and present an analysis explaining themeaning of the data. This
critical success factors’, The TQM Journal, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 188-208.5. Cole, R. C. (1941). Vocational guidance for boys: a program for schools and social agencies. New York, London: Harper & Brothers.6. dos Santos Matai, P. H. L., & Matai, S. (2009). Cooperative Education: Andragogy. Retrieved from International Social Science Council,ISSC, 1, rue Miollis, Paris Cedex 15, 75732, France website: http://www.iiis.org/CDs2009/CD2009SCI/ag2009/PapersPdf/A064IQ.pdf7. Dukovska-Popovska, I., Hove-Madsen, V., & Nielsen, K. B. (2008). Teaching lean thinking through game: Some challenges. 36th European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI) on Quality Assessment, Employability & Innovation.8. Eckes, G. (2001) The Six
2015 AIChE Annual Meeting.The survey was conducted via a web-based interface hosted by runningthe open-source software LimeSurvey (limesurvey.org). E-mail invitations to participate wereinitially sent to all 158 department chairs in the United States requesting participation from thefaculty members teaching the relevant course(s). A separate request was sent directly to theinstructors of record for process controls courses during the 2014-2015 academic year based oninformation posted online. From that population, 81 usable responses representing 77 institutionsin the United States were received for a 48.7% institutional response rate.Questions were composed in consultation amongst the authors and were intended to providesome continuity with
confidence without conceit. They have a firm handshake, look people inthe eye, address colleagues by name, take pride in their appearance, speak up instead ofmumbling, etc.”“I want the students to show full confidence to look me in the eye and tell me where theirinterests are, definitive answers are always best.” Leadership research reveals a positive relationship in a leader’s self-confidence andsuccessful leadership34. These findings also align with Hartman et. al.’s (2015) study whereindustry professionals identified initiative/confidence as a main competence for entry-levelengineering leaders. The authors define the initiative/confidence theme as “stepping up, goingthe extra step, asking questions, having confidence and/or self-confidence
assessment feedback in student learning”, J. Studies in Higher Education, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2002. [5] Epstein Educational Enterprises. (2019). “IF-AT by Epstein Educational Enterprises”, [Online]. Available: http://www.epsteineducation.com/. [Accessed Jan. 7, 2019]. [6] S. H. Cotner, B. A. Fall, S. M. Wick, J. D. Walker, and P. M. Baepler, “Rapid Feedback Assessment Methods: Can We Improve Engagement and Preparation for Exams in Large-enrollment Courses?”, J.Science Education and Technology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 437–443, Oct. 2008. [7] B. R. Cook and A. Babon, “Active learning through online quizzes: better learning and less (busy) work”, J.Geography in Higher Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 24–38, Jan. 2017. [8] S
Paper ID #25277Visibly Random Grouping Applied to First-Semester EngineeringDr. Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics and engineering education departments. She is currently a member of the
: • Course(s) enrolled • Employment during university enrollment, • Factors leading students to not pursue their project as a startup, and • Suggested measures for increasing the rate of startup formation from course projects3. ResultsThe study’s three hypotheses were assessed using the interviews and the coded data. On average,each of the 16 participants provided 2.2 reasons for not launching their project as a startup. 3.1. Hypothesis 1Hypothesis 1 was that students do not continue with their projects because they cannot take timeaway from the paying jobs that are supporting their education. The data suggest that this is true.As shown in Fig. 1, students most frequently mentioned lack of time as a factor discouragingpursuing a
high school technology education and test scores for algebra 1 and geometry. History, 54(69.7), 71-7. 5. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P‐12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387. 6. Sheppard, S. D., Pellegrino, J. W., & Olds, B. M. (2008). On becoming a 21st century engineer. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 231-234. 7. National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12187. 8. Wilson‐Lopez, A., Mejia, J. A., Hasbún, I. M., & Kasun, G. S. (2016). Latina
Community in Introductory Engineering Classrooms”, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Engineering Education, Columbus, OH. 5 pp.[3] K. L. Tonso. 2014. “Engineering identity,” in Handbook of engineering education research, Cambridge University Press, pp. 267–282.[4] B. W. McNeill, L. Bellamy, and V. A. Burrows. 2000. “Team Norms and Communication,” in Introduction to Engineering Design, 9th ed., McGraw Hill Higher Education, pp. 1–13.[5] S. Gorman. 2014. Peering into the Culture of a Civil Engineering Discipline and Finding the White Rabbit, PhD Dissertation, Northern Arizona University. 285 pp.[6] E. Godfrey. 2007. “Cultures within cultures : Welcoming or unwelcoming for women ?,” ASEE, 19 pp.[7] S. J
, William Worley, Robin Matson, Madison Behringer, Annie Wong, Tori Bonagura, Karan Sahu,and Nick Graca for their contributions to the game development and testing. Finally, the authors would liketo thank the anonymous reviewers for their time and valuable suggestions that contributed to greatlyimproving the overall quality of this paper.References[1] CyberCiege, http://cisr.nps.edu/cyberciege/.[2] Forensic Toolkit (FTK), http://accessdata.com/solutions/digital-forensics/forensic-toolkit-ftk/.[3] Farmer, D., and Venena, W., Forensic Discovery, Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series, 2004.[4] Gee, J., What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy, Palgrave Macmillan, NY, 2003. 2.[5] Mathrani, A., Christian, S., and
, pp.305-308, Apr. 2013.[5] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor,, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, pp. 8410–8415, June 2014.[6] I. Han and J. B. Black, “Incorporating haptic feedback in simulation for learning physics,” Computers & Education, vol. 57, pp.2281-2290, Dec. 2011.[7] T. Wiesner, and W. Lan, “Comparison of student learning in physical and simulated unit operations experiments,” J. Engineering Education, vol. 93, pp.195-204, July 2004.[8] L. M. Triona and D. Klahr, “Point and click or drag and heft: Comparing the influence of
! Area-Moment !T EnergyMethod Singularity Function E !S&$ !S*T !T + !U !T − !U X ! = ± ( )X +PTU 2 2 Figure 3. Main Flow of the Knowledge Apps - Common Concept Map [17]To make the course materials more accessible
/ Flip w/ Blended Flip Quade’s Effect Blended Flip Adaptive Adaptive Test Size Dem Average Percentage (Adjusted) p d* Sample Size Group (s) All 63.0 65.1 63.5 0.949 0.13 126 88 83 (16.1) (16.1) (16.1) Female 65.5 60.5 61.2 0.513 -0.29 20
, thisintroduction included basic soldering iron safety rules. Students worked in groups of three: twohigh school students with one trained undergraduate or graduate student. These three studentsadapted one toy together, with the trained undergraduate or graduate student guiding the processbut allowing the high school students to do the hands-on work and problem solve through theprocess.Definition of racial and ethnic minority groupsIn regards to the definition of URM in high school enrollment (as listed above for two highschools), the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction identifiesHispanic/Latino of any race(s), American Indian/Alaskan Native, Black/African American, andNative Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander [23]. Additionally
hardware/software platform issues and design and develop activities with activelearning strategies in mind.References1. Lewis, L., K. Snow, E. Farris, and D. Levin. 1999. “Distance Education at Postsecondary Institutions: 1997-98 (NCES) 2000-013.” Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.2. Morrison, G.R. and S. M. Ross. 2007. “Designing Effective online Instruction. In R. Luppicini (Ed.), Learning Communities in Online Education.” Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing: 75-85.3. Hsiung, S., J. M. Ritz and J. Eiland. 2008. “Design and Develop a Cost Effective Microcontroller Training System for Distance Learning Engineering Students.” In Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering4. Hsiung, S, Ritz, J. M
. Therefore, future studies regarding student motivationsystems or other psychological factors are in need to explore factors that facilitate or impedestudents to transfer to a four-year engineering institution and factors that facilitate or impedetheir subsequent success at the four-year institutions. Third, time to graduation was consideredonly at the final degree granting institution. Therefore, further exploration about the amount oftime that transfer students have spent at their initial institution(s) is necessary in order to accountfor total time to graduation. Fourth, some factors that could be investigated here are the slope ofhow fast they graduate from the degree granting institution which is an indicator oftransferability of courses that
, S. O., and Terry, R. E., ”Use of the Kolb Learning Cycle and the 4MAT System in Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, April 1993, pp. 70-77.3. Harb, J. N., Terry, R. E., Hurt, P. K., and Williamson, K. J., Teaching Through The Cycle: Application of Learning Style Theory to Engineering Education at Brigham Young University, 2nd Edition, Brigham Young University Press, 1995.4. Ortiz, L. E. and Bachofen, E. M., “An Experience in Teaching Structures in Aeronautical, Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Applying the Experimental Methodology,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 2526.5. Harding, T. S., Lai, H.-Y
Paper ID #12829Writing-to-Learn-to-Program: Examining the Need for a New Genre in Pro-gramming PedagogyDr. Bryan A. Jones, Mississippi State University Bryan A. Jones (S’00–M’00) received the B.S.E.E. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Rice University, Houston, TX, in 1995 and 2002, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineer- ing from Clemson University, Clemson, SC, in 2005. He is currently an Assistant Professor with the Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS. From 1996 to 2000, he was a Hardware Design Engineer with Compaq, where he specialized in board layout for high
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2004).14. A. C. Estes, R. W. Welch, and K. F. Meyer , “Will Ten Pounds Fit into a Five Pound Bag?,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2005).15. S. H. VanderLeest, “Advocating Breadth in a World of Depth,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2005).16. B. R. Thompson, “The MS in Engineering Management at Milwaukee School of Engineering: An Update,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2005).17. S. Viswanathan and H. E. Evans, “Creating a Differentiated, Relevant, and
professional development project described in this paper. Sandia is a multi-programlaboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company for the United StatesDepartment of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.References1. Shigley, J. E., Mischke, C. R., and Budynas, R. G., Mechanical Engineering Design, 7th Ed., McGraw Hill, 2004.2. Bachnak, R., Verma, S., and Coppinger, T., “Restructuring the Capstone Course Leads to Successful Projects,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Section 1647, June 2005.3. Burbank, K., Holcomb, J., Cooper-Duffy, K., and Prohn, JK., “A Wheelchair Navigation System as a Collaborative Senior Project,” Proceedings of the
mechanical engineering at Michigan Technological University, developing research in the area of environmentally responsible design and manufacturing.Bob Meyer, University of Wisconsin-Stout Page 12.1130.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Opportunities and Challenges for Manufacturing EngineeringAbstractDuring the decades of the 1980’s and 1990’s, the development of undergraduate and graduatemanufacturing engineering programs advanced and legitimized the manufacturing engineeringdiscipline. With recent perceived loss of manufacturing production to oversees locations and thecontinued public perception of
the data matrix lies from the center of the galvo workspace; thelow setting is directly in the center and the high setting is 20 mm to the right of center. Finally,LED intensity is a setting on the camera that reads the barcode with 130 being on the low end ofthe recommended range and 160 on the upper end.The following machine parameters remained constant throughout this DOE: • Coupon Type: Black anodized aluminum at .47 mm thick • Barcode Size: 1mm x 1mm • Barcode Text: OXFORD LASERS • Laser Beam: 266 nm • Foreground on barcode camera: White • Beam movement: Galvo • Pen style: 1 (100 mm/s) • Hatches used: 1 (Horizontal) and 2 (Vertical) • Distance from center movement: X axis only • Fluorescent lights inside laser: On
there was an increased level of awareness of the students’learning, and that awareness will be used in other courses.6. Bibliography1. Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M. and McGoury, J., “The ABET “Professional Skills”- Can They Be Taught?Can They Be Assessed?,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, January 2005, pp. 41-55.2. Roselli, R. J. and Brophy S. P., “Effectiveness of Challenge-Based Instruction in Biomechanics,” Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol. 95, No. 4, October 2006, pp. 311-324.3. Wankat, P., “A Push for Participation,” PRISM, Vol. 15, No. 5, January 2006, pp. 39.4. Jawaharlal, Mariappan, Fan, Uei-Jiun and Monemi, Saeed, “Implementing Service-Learning in EngineeringCurriculum,” Presented at the 2006 ASEE Annual
, confusing the truesubject matter. This often occurs since without standardized partitioning of the control levels thevarious control sub-components are intertwined. Page 12.1276.8 iR R u RS uTR iS S u ST iT T u i System Level Control iRc iSc iTc ic Application Level
ingroups and prefer same-sex groups over mixed group settings.20 They also prefer problem-centered and socially relevant topics and activities.2,3,4 Research also indicates that females andminority students tend to prefer cooperative activities over competitions.22,23In addition, STEM students from underrepresented groups have identified cultural factors ashaving the greatest impact on their retention. This seems to beg attention for enhanced culturalunderstanding by those who are responsible for supporting students and mentoring thesedeveloping professionals.14 Multicultural counseling and teaching has emerged as a concern overthe years. In the early 1990’s multicultural competencies for human services were developed.24These competencies centered
AC 2007-735: SPEAKING TECH TO POWERDavid Bodde, Clemson University Dr. David L. Bodde Dr. Bodde is a professor of engineering and business at Clemson University and a Senior Fellow at Clemson’s Spiro Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership. Dr. Bodde serves on the Board of Directors of a variety of companies: Great Plains Energy (a diversified energy company and electric utility), the Commerce Funds (a mutual fund), and several privately held ventures. His past experience includes Vice President of the Midwest Research Institute, Assistant Director of the U. S. Congressional Budget Office, and Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Department of Energy. He recently
loyalty, improvequality, improve working conditions, improve employee job satisfaction, improve theirreputation, improve profits, and improve stakeholder returns. Things are never simply ‘goodenough’ for them; there is always room for improvement.Those organizations that have adopted this approach to quality are better off and more able tosuccessfully compete in today’s highly competitive global economy. They have become theleaders in their field. However, those organizations that have ignored the benefits of TQM willbecome the laggards in their field, struggling to survive right up to the time they go out ofbusiness.Bibliography1. Bailey, S. K. (1968). Objectives of the theory of public administration. Monograph of American Academy of