is a phenomenological case study that is explaining how a community college student experiences an undergraduate research experience and its influence on their motivation and values, including its influence on the completion of their engineering degree as they pursue and continue a career in engineering.Dr. Richard Goldberg, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Richard Goldberg is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Depart- ment of Applied Physical Sciences at UNC Chapel Hill. He is developing a new integrated engineering minor and major at UNC. He is interested in integrating engineering with the liberal arts and an en- trepreneurial mindset. He teaches a variety of
mathematics students will be exposed to an example of a real world scientific example of the importance of data analysis. A GIFT teacher placed in a corporate industrial engineering department spent her summer consolidating and organizing time-study data. She also created databases, executed queries, ran audits and created graphs. From her needs assessment she wrote “I want to place special emphasis on critical thinking and technology because many students fall greatly short in these areas, and they must be proficient in both to be contributing employees.” She expressed a desire to implement a curriculum that is more real world oriented and planed to expose her mathematics students to MS Access
Curriculum Review Committee with a view toassisting them with the integration of information skills into the entire curriculum.Members of the Review Committee were already convinced about the ineffective natureof ad hoc information skills programs (the add-on library classes) which are usuallyoffered as an afterthought, not as integral to the education process. The need to produce aprogram integrating information skills at all levels of the curriculum so that the graduatesleft with a set of information skills was recognised at the beginning of the planningprocess. One academic member of the Committee and two librarians formed a workingparty to produce a list of attitudes, skills and competencies for the graduates in order toensure the subjects
academic engagement by connecting Collaboratory work to faculty and student loads.Integrated Projects Curriculum (IPC)The Department of Engineering has developed and begun implementation of an Integrated ProjectsCurriculum (IPC) to engage students academically and professionally. The IPC draws on service-learningpedagogy to provide students with credit-bearing opportunities to engage the knowledge content of theiracademic discipline in the context of a specific problem or need, and to reflect on the experience in viewof Christian faith commitments. Service-learning is a pedagogy for achieving holistic, value changing,and action oriented learning objectives. It places students in contact with the needs of others, inrelationship with persons
European Conference on (pp. 353-358). IET.5. Ioannides, M. G. (2004). Design and implementation of PLC-based monitoring control system for induction motor. IEEE transactions on energy conversion, 19(3), 469-476.6. Armstrong, R. W. (1998). Load to motor inertia mismatch: unveiling the truth. In Drives and Controls Conference.7. Akram, Hossian. (2011)-352: Integrating Servomotor Concepts into Mechatronics Engineering Technology Curriculum Emphasizing High Speed Packaging Machinery8. Merzouki, R., Davila, J. A., Fridman, L., & Cadiou, J. C. (2007). Backlash phenomenon observation and identification in electromechanical system. Control Engineering Practice, 15(4), 447-4579. Li, Huaizhong., Le, M. D., Gong, Z. M., & Lin, W. (2009
resources and research practices ● Providing consultations to biomedical engineering faculty, researchers, and students at each stage of the research life cycle, on topics such as research data management, scholarly publishing, grant development, and research integrity ● Partnering with faculty by actively contributing to research proposals and projects, curriculum development and delivery, and evidence-based decision makingThe size of the Biomedical Engineering program has increased and that has resulted in the BMEliaison librarian having an opportunity to focus more on the design of 100 level classes.Connections between the library and the BME department have always been strong, but now theapproach is more
achieve thesame objectives but at smaller social or environmental costs? The “integrated sustainabletechnology and development” option presents many imposing challenges, but it must be thepreferred option.Is “Sustainable Technology” Sufficient?In 1993 the Georgia Institute of Technology launched a project to develop new curriculuminitiatives in sustainable development and technology. A three-course sequence of courses wasdeveloped and taught by faculty from various engineering and non-engineering programs.Importantly, the sustainability initiative at Georgia Tech came from the engineering faculty.The current dean of engineering, Jean-Lou Chameau, has been an energetic advocate ofintroducing sustainability to the education of engineering students
tothis course. In addition to providing direct support to students, UGTAs carry the bulk of the loadin ensuring designed parts are 3D printed and provided to students with minimumlatency. In addition to reviewing component suitability for printing and starting new print jobs, theperformance of routine maintenance is primarily performed by the UGTAs. Lab support duringthe project assembly phase and training in-coming UGTAs are also tasks performed by theUGTAs. This paper will provide an overview of our approach to incorporating the efforts ofundergraduate teaching assistants into a first-year engineering design class to assist otherinstitutions with integrating that same practice.IntroductionFor several years at Wayne State University
. Jean L Bossart P.E., University of Florida Jean Bossart is an Associate Engineering Librarian at the University of Florida (UF). Ms. Bossart assists students with research, data support, and citation management. In addition, she investigates and integrates creative technologies, such as 3D printing into the STEM discipline library services. She has a BS in chemical engineering and MS in environmental engineering from UF, over 20 years of experience in industry and consulting, and is a licensed professional engineer in Florida.Dr. Neelam BhartiDr. Mickey S. Schafer, University of Florida lapsed linguist teaching discipline-specific prose c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
college and includes faculty involved in departmental curriculumcommittees. The charge to the Roundtable has been to “Understand the changing environmentfor higher education and its implications for the College of Engineering and develop an actionplan that includes changes in course curriculum and delivery to meet the new challenges inundergraduate education.” This followed directly from the step 1 implementation from Massy tobuild awareness and commitment and is articulated with similar words in the CCSSI Phase Ireport and other institutional change literature.The Roundtable determined that three elements in addition to disciplinary excellencecharacterize the best undergraduate engineering education: 1) curriculum and course contentrelevancy, 2
laboratories in their Mechatronic courses.1. IntroductionThe reshoring of manufacturing in the United States requires a retraining of a workforce toutilize advanced manufacturing tools and techniques and automation [1]. Automation requirestraining in mechatronics, which integrates mechanical and electrical systems to developautomated systems that are controlled with programming. Mechatronics is the foundation ofautomated systems and has become not only a need to shorten the current manufacturing skillsgap [2], but also serves as a platform to provide STEM education. Mechatronics is an important area of study for several STEM related fields, butspecifically for the applied ones such as Engineering Technology (ET). ET as a discipline hasexisted
. After the introduction, the paper will be organized in thefollowing sections: (1) goals for change, (2) barriers to change, (3) foci for change, and (4)strategies for change.Intr oductionAs an engineering faculty member, you may be in the midst of working on a curricularinnovation or contemplating making a curricular innovation. In either case, you may be thinkingthat the curricular innovation on which you are working (or hope to be working) will eventuallybe broadly adopted across your department, college, or institution. However, issues that you facewhen developing your curricular innovation are almost entirely different from issues that youface when contemplating broader adoption of your curriculum. Curriculum developmentintegrates subject
School in Boston’sChinatown. They also aid 1st and 2nd grade teachers in Lincoln, MA implement a hands-onLEGO based engineering curriculum aimed at giving students early exposure to engineering. Allof the curriculum created by STOMP students is available at the CEEO’s site –http://www.ceeo.tufts.edu/robolabatceeo. The feedback from teachers has been tremendously positive. They enjoy havingsomeone to collaborate with and feel the STOMP volunteers bring an energy and excitement tothe class. The number of engineering projects and level of difficulty of projects attempted isincreased by having STOMP volunteers in the classroom. The STOMP students feedback hasalso been good. The students enjoy their classroom experiences and feel rewarded by
‟competencies that contribute to an effective and optimal engineering design process. Writtenand oral communications skills, teamwork, marketing, leadership and project management skillshave long been recognized as valuable traits. This paper asserts, as a result of globalization andthe overall expansion of engineering industries across international borders, that there is a needfor a new, non-technical competency for engineering students in intercultural communication.Engineering educators should include this competency in curriculum in order to educate ourstudents as global citizens who are capable of working tactfully, graciously, and effectively ininternational settings.While other educators have found bases for courses and modules that address
, which is not implemented in any otherautonomous vehicle programs.III. Approach The AUGV project at USMA is a multidisciplinary activity with electrical engineering andmechanical engineering curriculum. Figure 1 shows the course map. This paper focuses on theAutonomous Vehicle block. The design project consists of building an autonomous vehicle which will Figure 1 Course Map 2incorporate applied knowledge of robotics. In an introductory mechatronics course, there needs to be adesign project which allows students to apply these concepts in a meaningful way. This is done duringthe last five weeks of the semester by inductive learning. Inductive
, which is not implemented in any otherautonomous vehicle programs.III. Approach The AUGV project at USMA is a multidisciplinary activity with electrical engineering andmechanical engineering curriculum. Figure 1 shows the course map. This paper focuses on theAutonomous Vehicle block. The design project consists of building an autonomous vehicle which will Figure 1 Course Map 2incorporate applied knowledge of robotics. In an introductory mechatronics course, there needs to be adesign project which allows students to apply these concepts in a meaningful way. This is done duringthe last five weeks of the semester by inductive learning. Inductive
can comprehend, design, and mange cyber-physicalsystems [7]. The electricity system of the 21st century will require an adaptable and flexibleworkforce with additional areas of expertise and capabilities than the current workforce.The integration of variable renewable sources, storage systems, smart grid, and demandmanagement will require new training and skillsets [6]. The evolving demands on theelectricity industry are causing a number of workforce challenges for the electricityindustry, which include large shifts in skills needed and in geographic location of jobs, askills gap for deploying and operating newer technologies, changes occurring during aperiod when the industry is facing high levels of retirements, and challenges recruiting
explained with abrief narrative containing several key ideas that provide detail, or broad understandings, of thestandard. Within each standard, there are benchmarks provided by grade band (Pk-2, 3-5, 6-8,and 9-12) that detail what students should know and be able to do within the specified context.Benchmarks are written with active, measurable verbs to facilitate unit and lesson planning aswell as assessments. Additionally, each of the 142 benchmarks align with one or more of thedomains of learning – cognitive, psychomotor, and/or affective – and ITEEA offers an onlineresource to aid curriculum developers and classroom teachers in making these connections. Eachof these three domains are also correlated to the technology and engineering dimensions
results from the combination of grasping and transforming experience” (Kolb 1984, p. 41). Kolb’s experiential learning theory describes how students absorb and use information and is commonly shown in a four stage cycle ‐ concrete experience, observation of and reflection on that experience, formation of abstract concepts based upon the reflection, and testing the new concepts.1 A number of studies have shown the benefits of experiential learning and various models of integrating the concepts in the college curriculum. 2 A common way of providing experiential learning to college students are internship and co‐op experiences. In Liberal Education and America’s Promise [LEAP] report, developed by the American Association of Colleges and
, Texas State University, San Marcos Dr. Shaunna Smith is an Assistant Professor of Educational Technology in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Texas State University. She holds an Ed.D. in Curriculum & Instruction with an em- phasis on technology integration and art education. Her teaching and research explore how the hands-on use of design-based technologies (e.g. digital fabrication, 3D modeling and printing, computer program- ming, and DIY robotics) can impact multidisciplinary learning that transcends traditional content contexts (e.g. arts-based STEM integration). At her free mobile makerspace for K-12 students and teachers, The MAKE Lab (http://themakelab.wp.txstate.edu), she is currently
, recognizing their responsibility to protect the health and welfare of the public, and to be accountable for the social and environmental impact of their engineering practice.4. To establish an educational environment in which students participate in cross- disciplinary, team-oriented, open-ended activities that prepare them to work in integrated engineering teams.5. To offer a curriculum that encourages students to become broadly educated engineers and life-long learners, with a solid background in the basic sciences and mathematics, an understanding and appreciation of the arts, humanities, and social sciences, an ability to communicate effectively for various audiences and purposes, and a desire to seek out further educational
, identify its relevance, find it quickly and accurately, and use it to solve problems. ADL originated in the School of Aerospace Engineering (AE) at Georgia Tech, where the needs for cross-disciplinary learning, and the limitations of present systems, are keenly felt at all levels of the curriculum and research. AE is ideal for such an experiment, being rich in cross-disciplinary issues, and focused on vertical
about being a part of the decision making process In the class. By taking an active role in the class, students feel more enthusiastic and excited about the learning process. Technology Education as a subject, lends itself easily to this concepts. Few students are passive containers waiting to be thrilled by the vast knowledge of the teacher. The nonlinear approach to curriculum organization not only makes the curriculum come alive for the student, but keeps the teacher excited and enthused as well (Thode & Thode, 1997). This constructivist approach is central to the amazing outcomes of his program. He callshis approach a “nonlinear” approach. According to Thode, nonlinear refers to students
solutions to modern problems.While traditional engineering programs provide students with the technical skills required oftheir profession, students often lack the knowledge and resources on how to incorporate complexenvironmental and social factors into decision-making so that they are prepared to face society’sevolving challenges. As part of a larger initiative to integrate traditional technical skills withenhanced social awareness into the engineering curriculum, a two-part module emphasizing theenvironmental and social design considerations of sustainability was added to an existing moduleseries in a third-year Materials Science course. This paper will describe the design,implementation, and assessment of one part of this module entitled “The
undergraduate curriculum. While overall students saw some value in developingvisual-spatial skills, civil and mechanical students rated the importance higher. Studentsgenerally did not indicate that body-kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, or intrapersonal werebeing addressed within the curriculum. Furthermore, they did not think that body-kinesthetic ormusical should be addressed within the curriculum. However, they saw some value inaddressing interpersonal and intrapersonal skills. Figure 2: Student assessment of the extent to which an MI is currently addressed within the curriculum and the extent to which it should be addressed.We did not observe any significant gender differences with one exception: females self-evaluatedtheir
small robotic vehicles programmable in a dialect of Java and expandable through multiple sensors and wireless controllers, such a Bluetooth or RFID. Multiple Lego MindStorms NXT2.0 robotic vehicles that can be programmed in a variety of languages including a native language, as well as Java, C and LabVIEW. Three older generation SCARA robotic arms, with an interface via a RS232C serial port that allows full scale programming but without providing feedback to the controller. These robotic devices, both the simpler ones and the ones fully equipped, form the overallplatform for implementing the ideas of integrating the STEM curriculum in practical courses
electrical engineers", Proceedings of ASEE AC 2009-671.36. Piaget, J. "To Understand Is To Invent", N.Y.: Basic Books, 197437. You, Y., "A project-oriented approach in teaching robotics application engineering", Proceedings of ASEE AC 2009-2354.38. Michalson, W., "Balancing breadth and depth in engineering education: unified robotics III and IV", Proceedings of ASEE AC 2009-1681.39. Ciaraldi, M., "Designing an undergraduate robotics engineering curriculum: unified robotics I and II", Proceedings of ASEE AC 2009-1161.40. Devine, K., "Integrating robot simulation and off-line programming into an industrial robotics course", Proceedings of ASEE AC 2009-2159.41. Schneider, R., "Robotic Automation Can Cut Costs", Manufacturing Engineering
NSF funded initiative to promote systemic change in engineering educationby having faculty collaborate in teams to re-envision their roles in the students’ learning process.The ultimate goals of the project are:• to educate engineering faculty in instructional design techniques that are then implemented throughout the curriculum• to transform the classroom into an active learning environment using cooperative learning and other learning approaches, and• to efficiently and effectively incorporate the use of information technology in the learning process. Initial efforts at Bucknell University have focussed on getting both faculty and students towork together as teams. For the first time, faculty members from across the
resource planning, use, and management. A related goal is to operationalize such cross cutting objectives as gender equality, network development, fundraising, outreach, and policy impact. The USPCAS‐W Program is being implemented through five components: (1) Governance, (2) Curriculum Reform, (3) Applied Research, (4) Training, and (5) Sustainability. More details of USPCAS‐W are available at http://water.utah.edu/uspcasw and http://water.muet.edu.pk/. The USPCAS‐W Curriculum component is anchored by the creation of four new graduate degree programs in areas of great need in Pakistan: (1) Hydraulics, Irrigation, and Drainage; (2) Integrated Water Resources Management; (3) Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) Sciences; and (4) Environmental
learnt thus giving them a potential advantage inthe job market over other entry level competitors without that experience.While maintaining technical execution, students often require the acquisition of complementary technicalexpertise not covered in the official curriculum [18]. This combination of skills remains an area of studywithin engineering education that is still in need of further development and refinement for differentmajors [19]. Engineering collaboration within team settings must “move beyond the divide and conquer”approach (commonly observed) and instead operate in a dynamic and integrative mode that resembles theactual building industry [20]. Multi-disciplinary teams provide an excellent way to promote integrationthat allows for