Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Student-Centered Activities and Maker Spaces in Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Holly Jr., Purdue University, West Lafayette; Cole H. Joslyn, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Avneet Hira, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Morgan M. Hynes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Chanel Beebe, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

). The role of interest in learning and development. InK. A. Renniger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), Interest, learning, and development. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.Marzano R. J., Pickering D., McTighe J. (1993). Assessing student outcomes: Performanceassessment using the dimensions of learning model. Alexandria, VA: Association forSupervision and Curriculum Development.Montfort, D. B., Brown, S., & Whritenour, V. (2013). Secondary students' conceptualunderstanding of engineering as a field. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research(J-PEER), 3(2), 1-12.Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York, NY: BasicBooks

Conference Session

Socio-Technical Issues in Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park; Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland, College Park; Thomas M. Philip, University of California, Los Angeles

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Paper ID #16586The Dynamics of Perspective-taking in Discussions on Socio-technical IssuesDr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta is Assistant Research Professor in Physics and Keystone Instructor in the A. J. Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. Broadly speaking he is interested in modeling learning and reasoning processes. In particular, he is attracted to fine-grained analysis of video data both from a micro- genetic learning analysis methodology (drawing on knowledge in pieces) as well as interaction analysis methodology. He has been working on how learners’ emotions

Conference Session

Socio-Technical Issues in Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Priya Balasubramanian, Grand Valley State University; Nael Barakat, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

survey responders for sharing their opinions via the survey.References1. Callahan, D. The Hastings Center and the early years of bioethics. Theor. Med. Bioeth. 33, 11–20 (2012).2. Al-Rodhan, N. The Many Ethical Implications of Emerging Technologies - Scientific American. (2015). at 3. Brey, P. in A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology (eds. Olsen, J. K. B., Pedersen, S. A. & Hendricks, V. F.) 392–396 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2009) at 4. Human Genome Project Completion: Frequently Asked Questions. National Human Genome Research Institute (2010) at 5. Downes, L. & Nunes, P. Regulating 23andMe Won’t Stop the New Age of Genetic Testing | WIRED. (2014). at 6. Lindsay, R. A. Future bioethics: overcoming taboos, myths, and dogmas

Conference Session

Case and Scenario in Engineering Ethics Instruction

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elisa L. Warford, University of Southern California

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Paper ID #16036Ethics in the Classroom: The Volkswagen Diesel ScandalDr. Elisa L. Warford, University of Southern California Elisa Warford is a senior lecturer in the Engineering Writing Program at the University of Southern Cal- ifornia, where she teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in written and oral engineering commu- nication. Her current research interests include the rhetoric of science and portrayals of engineering and technology in American literature. She is also a professional technical editor specializing in engineering writing for academia and industry. She holds a Ph.D. in English from the University

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jana Lunt, Southern Utah University; John S. MacLean, Southern Utah University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

include financial support, faculty and peermentoring programs, and professional and graduate school preparation seminars. Based onexternal survey results, students recognize the value of the program, and the goals of the programare being successfully met. Continued adjustments based on lessons learned will improve thestudents’ experiences. This program can serve as a model for supporting students with financialand/or social disadvantages.References1. Nunez, A. M., & Cuccaro-Alamin, S. (1998). First Generation Students: Undergraduates Whose Parents Never Enrolled in Postsecondary Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).2. Thayer, P. B. (2000). Retention of Students from First

Collection

2016 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Jeffrey S. Bates; Taylor D. Sparks

2016 ASEE Rocky Mountain Section Conference7 G. D. Kuh, What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement, Journal of College Student Development 50 (2009) 6, 683-706.8 M. F. Bugallo, A. M. Kelly, A pre-college recruitment strategy for electrical and computer engineering study, 4th IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (2014) 1-4.9 D. F. Shell, M. P. Hazley, Associations of students’ creativity, motivation, and self-regulation with learning and achievement in college computer science courses, IEEE (2013) 1-7.10 W. B. Stouffer, J. S. Russell, M. G. Oliva, Making the strange familiar: creativity and the future of engineering education, American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division: Sustainability and Hands-On Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado - Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

, VA.6. ASCE – American Society of Civil Engineers. 2011. The ASCE Code of Ethics: Principles, Study, and Application. ASCE. Reston, VA.7. ASCE – American Society of Civil Engineers. 2013. 2013 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure. ASCE. Reston, VA.8. ASEE PEER. https://peer.asee.org/advanced_search?q=%22concept+map%22&collection_id=&year=&published_after=&pu blished_before= accessed Dec. 20, 20159. Badurdeen, F., D.Sekulic, B. Gregory, A. Brown, H. Fu. 2014. Developing and teaching a multidisciplinary course in systems thinking for sustainability: lessons learned through two iterations. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 15-18

Conference Session

Case Studies and Programs to Improve Graduate Students' Skills

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fazil T. Najafi, University of Florida; Emily Rivera P.E., University of Florida; Ryan Thrun, U.S. Navy; Sarah Isabel Romero, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

. Retrieved from http://www.geysers.com/history.aspx.4. Harding-Newman, T., J. Morrow, S. Sanyal. Success of Geothermal Wells: A Global Study. International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC, 2013.5. Monastero, F. C. Model for Success: An Overview of Industry-Military Cooperation in the Development of Power Operations at the Coso Geothermal Field in Southern California. The Geothermal Resources Council (GRC) Bulletin. September/October 2002, Pp. 188-194.6. Mateck, B. 2014 Annual U.S. & Global Geothermal Power Production Report. Geothermal Energy Association, 2014.7. Geysers by the Numbers: The Geysers Geothermal Field 2014 Statistics. Calpine Corporation, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.geysers.com

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul C. Lynch, Penn State University - Erie; Cynthia Bober, Penn State University; Joseph Wilck, United States Air Force Academy

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

“unsatisfying” class together. To alleviate this issue relating to beingbinary of “good” or “bad” courses, only one course was evaluated in each survey given tostudents. The course assigned to each student was randomly given for one of three courses thatthe students would have taken or have been currently enrolled in, named Class A, Class B, ClassC. Each survey type had approximately 35 students in the sample set. Therefore, the 107participating students were split into thirds to compare three courses. The questions and formatamong the class versions remained the same. Different courses within the curriculum werechosen to avoid a student ranking courses very high or very low in satisfaction, leading to a nullmodel that shows little significance. All

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yanna Lambrinidou, Virginia Tech; Nathan E Canney, Seattle University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

’ interactions with “the public.” To explore these questions, weare examining a) official engineering documents that frame the profession’s discourse aroundengineers’ relationship with society, b) perspectives of engineers, and c) perspectives ofmembers of what Hess calls “mobilized” publics.27 As groups that stand in opposition to specificengineering decisions, technologies, or practices and that strive to be heard, mobilized publicsmight offer insight into how engineering imaginaries are expressed in practice and affect criticalpoints of contact between engineers and society. Community perspectives may also highlightimportant aspects of what it is like to be “the public” that engineering imaginaries might distortor overlook. We anticipate that our

Conference Session

Solid and Structural Mechanics in Aerospace Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waterloo Tsutsui, Purdue University - West Lafayette; Michael C. Loui, Purdue University - West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

received higher grades thanthose who did not participate. The difference was about one-third of a grade point, for instance,B vs. B–.PLTL became well-established because PLTL could be modified to suit the needs of the studentsand educators. For instance, PLTL might also be conducted during a regular lecture session.Brown and Poor5 investigated the effectiveness of in-class peer tutoring (ICPT). In ICPT, a peerteam leader acts as a teaching assistant for a small group of students during the in-class exercise.The authors reported that more than 80% of students liked the ICPT experience. Furthermore,PLTL allowed students to experience social benefits. Students who participated in PLTLregularly made new friends during the sessions, and these peers

Conference Session

First-Year Issues in ECE Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Girma Tewolde, Kettering University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

different ways of implementing a traffic light circuit using: a) a hardware approach, b) a microcontroller, programming, and basic circuit elements. Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of each approach based on different criteria such as: cost, complexity, time-to-market, and design flexibility. • Research and brainstorm/painstorm with your lab partners and present innovative ways of improving a specific existing product or service by using a microcontroller such as the Arduino. For extra credit opportunity propose a new product or service with good analysis on its market potential.Module 4: In the fourth module students are introduced to basic concepts of mobile robotics,including actuators, sensors, and

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retention Programs for Diverse Students

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer L. Groh, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

] deep within yourown thoughts, as opposed to recieving [sic] only guidance from someone.(F, 3) I am looking forward to getting more practice in coaching so I can be more comfortablewith the types of questions that I will ask.(B, 3) Coaching can certainly be applied in several areas in life. I can already see how coachingcan be extremely helpful and learning-promoting opportunity in a professional (work) setting. Iam looking forward to further improve my coaching skills.(G, 4) I am interested to see when/how I will use the coaching skills I have learned in this classthroughout my life and how they will help me.Coaching technique:(J, 1) After completeing [sic] my first coaching session, I found that it was more difficult than Iwas expecting it to

Collection

2016 ETLI

Authors

Dean Chang

Innovation Instead GOTB And Ask Customers What They Need & Will “Pay” ForLean Startup isn’t explicitlyabout starting a company …It’s really about how tomaximize the number ofpeople you help and impact(i.e., the business model)That’s why we start with theseCustomer Segments(Does Anyone Care?)Value Propositions(Why Do They Care)Value Propositions(Why Do They Care) Idea, Technology,‘Sustainable’, ‘Interactive’ = Features, Not Value PropositionsFaster, Cheaper, Better (Mom & Apple Pie) =Weak Value Propositions Quantifiably Faster, Cheaper, Better =Better Value Propositions Q ua ntifia bl e, Rel eva nt, Significant, & Testable Product B e n e f i ts =Much

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alison K. Polasik, The Ohio State University; Glenn S. Daehn, The Ohio State University; Michelle R. McCombs, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

has led a range of education efforts for CEM including working with undergraduate and graduate STEM students to teach science lessons to inner city elementary students in Columbus, OH; organizing on-campus outreach efforts for middle school students; coordinating a summer Research Ex- perience for Undergraduates (REU) program and organizing professional development experiences for graduate students and postdoctoral researchers. Prior to joining CEM, she worked at the University of California, Davis for a NSF funded Science and Technology Center, the Center for Biophotonics Science and Technology, where she led a variety of similar efforts. c American Society for Engineering Education

Conference Session

Effective Use of Technology in Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Judith Virginia Gutierrez, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM); Frida Diaz Barriga, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM); Nelly Ramirez-Corona, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Aurelio Lopez-Malo, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Enrique Palou, Universidad de las Americas Puebla

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

of technological devicesSpecific skills (classified by means of the Digital Taxonomy9) that students believe they havedeveloped include the following:1. Remember (retrieving, recalling or recognizing knowledge from memory. Remembering is when memory is used to produce definitions, facts or lists, or recite or retrieve material10): a. Recitation (Word Processing, Mind map, presentation tools) b. Quiz/Test - Online tools (Blackboard), Word Processing (Word, Pages, Office 365, Google Documents, etc.). c. Definition - Word Processing (local or online – Word, Pages, Office 365, Google Documents, etc.), simple Mind maps, wikis, Moodle Glossary, etc

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter M. Osterberg, University of Portland; Aziz Sukru Inan, University of Portland

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

Contact 2 _ I + V µ1 +Q R B> A +I R @ µ2 B> A

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan R. Peterfreund, SageFox Consulting Group; Emanuel Costache, SageFox Consulting Group; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University & SKG Analysis; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Education: Looking for change as seen by ASEE members, 2012 to 2015BACKGROUNDDuring the Fall of 2012 and Spring of 2015, SageFox Consulting Group, external evaluators forthe National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter),1 undertook a study inorder (a) to establish a baseline that could be used by Epicenter to assess change over time inI&E initiatives within this community, and (b) to provide information to the Epicenter team thatwould assist in setting priorities and allocating resources. Within the context of the larger effortof evaluating Epicenter, it became clear that the study would provide a unique opportunity toaddress three key research questions that are the focus of this paper

Conference Session

Research on Design Learning

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cassandra Telenko, Georgia Institute of Technology; Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology; Christopher Saldana, Georgia Institute of Technology; Todd Sulchek, Georgia Institute of Technology; Shannon K. Yee, Georgia Institute of Technology; Wendy C. Newstetter, Georgia Institute of Technology; Thomas Kurfess, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #15472Examples of Synergies between Research and Hands-on Design-Based Learn-ingDr. Cassandra Telenko, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Cassandra Telenko holds a joint appointment in Mechanical Engineering and in Industrial Design at Georgia Tech. She has taught engineering, design, and sustainability topics at MIT, The Georgia Institute of Technology, SUTD, and UT-Austin. Dr. Telenko’s education research interests include sustainability, critical thinking, design thinking, and design-based learning. Her educational research products include a methodology for creating short-term design experiences for

Conference Session

Capstone and Collaborations in Civil Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin G. Sutterer, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Sue Niezgoda P.E., Gonzaga University; John Aidoo, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Capstone Design Conference, June 2-4, Columbus, Ohio.5. Hanson, J., Annor, F., Aidoo, J., Adu, A., Davenport, E., Kline, A., Owusu, A., Sollman, B., and Tikoli, D. (2012) “Capstone Design: Insights from an International Collaborative Student Team,” Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas.6. Howser, R., Trowbridge, M., Gauthier, J., Bloss, N., Fields, D., Aidoo, J., Hanson, J. (2008) “Overcoming the Communication Challenges in International Student Design Projects”, Annual Illinois/Indiana Section Conference, Engineering Education at the Crossroads, April 3-5, Terre Haute, Indiana.7. Olson, C. L., & Kroeger, K. R. (2001). Global competency and

Conference Session

Experiential Learning in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauren Sefcik Anderson, Lafayette College; James K. Ferri, Lafayette College; Ashley Danielle Cramer, Lafayette College

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

coming to lab. This is precisely where the benefit of video SOPs andthe flipped laboratory model can be realized.Table I below is the laboratory schedule for the course, which is divided into four blocks,increasing in complexity. The Blocks are: 1. Sequential Experiments I and II (Fluidized Beds) 2. Gas Chromatography (GC), Pump Performance, and Flow in Pipes and Valves 3. Packed Bed, Vapor Liquid Equilibrium (VLE), and Heat Exchanger 4. Process Control I, II, and III (Twin-column Distillation Unit)Table I. CHE 322 Laboratory Schedule of Experiments Week of Group (Monday) A B C th January 26

Conference Session

Software and Programming

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anurag Goswami, North Dakota State University; Gursimran Singh Walia, North Dakota State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

development (e.g., requirement, design, code, interfaces)13. Inspections takes place indifferent steps which involves: a) Selecting skilled individuals/inspectors, b) Individual review tofind faults, c) Team meeting to consolidate faults, d) Follow-up and repair.There are many variations on Fagan’s original concepts 14, 15 that emphasize different parts of theprocess (e.g. placing more emphasis on the individual preparation phase and less emphasison the team meeting phase). Regardless of whether there is a team meeting, the effectiveness ofthe individuals significantly impacts the overall effectiveness of the inspection 16. During the useof inspection technique, inspectors are given a set of checklists and printed form which guidesthem on how to

Conference Session

Assessment & Accreditation in ECE

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fong K. Mak, Gannon University; Ramakrishnan Sundaram, Gannon University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

Minima, and U for Unsatisfactory. However, in either cycle ofprocesses, there were no refined performance indicators (PI) defined for each SO. In order toprepare for the next cycle of accreditation and to better refine our assessment of the programeffectiveness, it is necessary to include performance indicators (PIs) for each SO. This would letus with the identification of areas for improvement. However, we rapidly realize that if, forexample, a set of three PIs are defined for each SO, the evaluation effort will be at least threetimes more time consuming. In addition, there are some significant challenges such as (a) how toassess and augment the PIs into the existing process (b) making the PIs acceptable to both, thefaculty within the

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Addressing the NGSS: Supporting K12 Teachers in Engineering Pedagogy, Engineering Science, Careers, and Technical Pathways

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Cafarella, University of Colorado - Boulder; Kevin O'Connor, University of Colorado - Boulder; Jacob (Jenna) McWilliams, University of Colorado - Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

four accountability groups defined in No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Actof 2001 and the reauthorized Elementary and Secondary Education Act [ESEA], Section1111(b)(2)(C)(v): • economically disadvantaged students, • students from major racial and ethnic groups, • students with disabilities, and • students with limited English proficiency. (p. 2)Appendix D focuses on three additional groups: Girls, students in alternative educationprograms, and gifted and talented students. Appendix D devotes a chapter to each these sevengroups, interweaving a case study that draws from research conducted in formal classrooms withinstructional principles for working with students from each group. In these case studies, NGSScommunicates messages about

Conference Session

Architectural Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amber Bartosh, Syracuse University; Bess Krietemeyer, Syracuse University; Sinéad C. Mac Namara, Syracuse University

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

DesignIntelligence. "Professionals Weigh Graduate Skills, Weaknesses." DesignIntelligence. November 15, 2003.Accessed February 01, 2016. http://www.di.net/articles/professionals_weigh_graduate_skills/.  3 Mac Namara, S.C., C.J. Olsen, Scott L. Shablak, Carolina B. Harris. Merging Engineering and ArchitecturalPedagogy – A Trans-disciplinary Opportunity? Proceedings of the 2010 ICEE Conference on EngineeringEducation, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland, July 18-22, 2010.4  Mac Namara, S.C. & C. J. Olsen. Collaborations in Architecture and Engineering. Routledge July 2014. Chapter16.  5 John Ochsendorf, “Teaching Architectonics” Keynote Lecture, 2013 Building Technology Educator’s SocietyConference, Roger Williams

Conference Session

Software Applications in ET Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maddumage Karunaratne, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

Real Projects," Proceedings 2001 Frontiers in Education Conference,Oct. 2001, Reno, NV.[8] Wong, P., & Pejcinovic, B., “Teaching MATLAB and C Programming in First-year Electrical EngineeringCourses Using a Data Acquisition Device,” Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2015,Seattle, Washington.[9] Ageenko, E., La Russa, G., "A Visualization Toolkit for Teaching, Learning and Experimentation in ImageProcessing," Frontiers in Education Conference 2005.[10] Aleksi, I.; Kraus, D.; Hocenski, Z., "Multi-language programming environment for C++ implementation ofSONAR signal processing by linking with MATLAB External Interface and FFTW," Proceedings ELMAR 2011Conference, September 2011, Zadar, Croatia.[11] Fincher, S., "What are

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 4B: Assessing Student Motivation and Student Success

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Quamrul H. Mazumder, University of Michigan - Flint; Vasudha Kilaru, University of Michigan - Flint

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

kykalava & Elena Anatolievna Vasilyeva (2015). On the problem of categorizing students based on their cognitive styles and teaching strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences; 176(2015), 578- 587 2. Danna Naurzalina et al. (2015). Impact of emotional intelligence on formation of meaning existential strategy among students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences; 171 (2015), 390-395. 3. Sadi, O. & Uyar, M. (2013). The relationship between cognitive self-regulated learning strategies and biology achievement: A path model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences; 93 (2013), 847-852 4. Zajacova, B. (2013). Learning styles in physics education: introduction of our research tools and design

Conference Session

Expanding the Perspectives of Underrepresentation in Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michele Yatchmeneff, University of Alaska Anchorage; Herbert P. Schroeder, University of Alaska, Anchorage; Matthew E. Calhoun, University of Alaska, Anchorage

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Engineering Students Form Career Goals. in 40th ASEE/IEEE Front. Educ. Conf. 1–2 (IEEE, 2010). at 25. American Society for Engineering Education. Innovation with impact: Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering edcuation. (American Society for Engineering Education, 2012).26. Cox, M. F., Cekic, O., Ahn, B. & Zhu, J. Engineering professionals’ expectations of undergraduate engineering students. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 60–70 (2012).27. National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering. Critical issues in engineering education policy. 2, (2012).28. University of Alaska Anchorage. UAA degree and certificate awards by gender, FY2011-2012. (2012).29. Nord, C. et al. The nation’s report

Conference Session

Engineering Management: Supply Chain, Systems Thinking, and Lean Initiatives

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raed Jaradat, Mississippi State University ; Sara E. Campbell, Mississippi State University; Sawsan Abutabenjeh, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

characteristics and behavioral competences of engineers with high capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST). Journal of Systems Engineering, 9(2), 91-103.9 Frank, M. (2002). Characteristics of engineering systems thinking-a 3D approach for curriculum content. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 32(3), 203-214.10 Jaradat, R., Keating, C., Bradley, J. (2014). A histogram analysis for system of systems. Int. J. System of Systems Engineering, 5(3), 193–227.11 Boardman, J., Sauser, B. (2008). Systems thinking: Coping with 21st century problems. New York: CRC Press.12 Carlock, P. G., Fenton, R. E. (2001). System of systems (SoS) enterprise systems engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chip W Ferguson, Western Carolina University; Paul M Yanik, Western Carolina University; Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University; Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Anagnos, T., Furman, B. J., Hsu, P., Backer, P. R., 2013, “How Important is the WOW Factor in First Year Engineering Courses?” AC2013-6417, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.4. Eris, O., Chachra, D., Chen, H. L., Sheppard, S., Ludlow, L., Rosca, C., Bailey, T., Toye, G., 2010, “Outcomes of a longitudinal administration of the persistence in engineering survey,” Journal of Engineering Education, 99, pp. 371-395.5. Mena, I. B., Zappe, S. E., Litzinger, T. A., 2013, “Examining the Experiences and Perceptions of First-Year Engineering Students,” AC2013-6270, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.6. National Academy of Engineering, 2005, “The Engineer