Oklahoma. He received his B.S. (2019) in Chemical and Biological Engineering from Colorado State University and his Ph.D. (2023) in Biomedical Engineering from University of Oklahoma.Dr. Stefan Wilhelm, University of Oklahoma Dr. Wilhelm is an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. In 2014, he received his doctoral degree from the University of Regensburg (Germany) under the supervision of Prof. Otto S. Wolfbeis (Institute of Analytical Ch ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Longitudinal Analysis of Strategies for Improving Biomedical Engineering Student Knowledge of Career Paths and Desired
material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.(2236075). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. References[1] R. R. Baiduc, R. A. Linsenmeier, and N. Ruggeri, “Mentored Discussions of Teaching: An Introductory Teaching Development Program for Future STEM Faculty,” Innov High Educ, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 237–254, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10755-015-9348-1.[2] D. Oerther, “Using nursing theory to improve the teaching of engineering practice.,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2017.[3] D. B
a more even distribution of student majors acrosssessions. Additionally, merging the introductory class with the engineering disciplinaryexploration could streamline the curriculum.References[1] Felder, Richard M. "Learning and teaching styles in engineering education." (2002).[2] Lichtenstein, Gary, Alexander C. McCormick, Sheri D. Sheppard, and Jini Puma. "Comparing the undergraduate experience of engineers to all other majors: Significant differences are programmatic." Journal of Engineering Education 99, no. 4 (2010): 305-317.[3] National Academy of Engineering, U. S. The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004.[4] Tinto, Vincent. Leaving college
., Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 77–97. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199982981.003.0006.[12] Committee on Developing Indicators of Educational Equity, Board on Testing and Assessment, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Monitoring Educational Equity. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2019, p. 25389. doi: 10.17226/25389.[13] P. S. Smith, M. M. Nelson, P. J. Trygstad, and E. R. Banilower, “Unequal Distribution of Resources for K-12 Science Instruction: Data from the 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education,” Horizon Research, Inc, Apr. 2013. Accessed: Jul. 01, 2024. [Online
efforts. It may also take one or two tries to finalize themodule based on student response and performance but the end result is very satisfying and animportant first-step in making our students into socially conscious and well-rounded futureengineers.References [1] Cech, E. A. “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?” Science, Technology, & Human Values 39, no. 1, 42–72, 2014. [2] Foor, C. E., & Walden, S. E. “"Imaginary engineering" or" re-imagined engineering": negotiating gendered identities in the borderland of a college of engineering.” National Women’s Studies Association Journal 21.2, 41-64, 2009. [3] Campbell, D. A. et. al. “Balancing Pedagogy and Student Experience in First-Year Engineering Courses”, In
ETD 335 University-Industry Partnerships to Enhance Engineering Education Maged B. Mikhail and Hassan S. Hayajneh Purdue University NorthwestAbstractEngineering education is facing a lot of challenges nowadays due to the COVID-19 pandemicand low enrollment issues that caused lowered funding opportunities and administrative budgetreductions. Engineering educators are required to play vital leadership roles to face thesechallenges. Combining efforts and collaborating with other programs and external partners,including community colleges, industry personnel
Framework for the Elderly Healthcare Services Using Digital Twin,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 49088–49101, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909828.[3] C. Boje, A. Guerriero, S. Kubicki, and Y. Rezgui, “Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research,” Automation in Construction, vol. 114. Elsevier B.V., Jun. 01, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179.[4] F. Tao, J. Cheng, Q. Qi, M. Zhang, H. Zhang, and F. Sui, “Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 94, no. 9–12, pp. 3563–3576, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1.[5] G. Garg, V. Kuts, and G. Anbarjafari, “Digital twin for
ETD 365 Innovation and Design in Academic Work through Industry Partnership Maged B. Mikhail and Hassan S. Hayajneh Purdue University NorthwestAbstractThere are many benefits of university-industry partnerships and collaborations (UIPC). Thestrength of university programs depends on staying relevant to innovative technology and currentmarket trends, not only regionally but globally. Having strong industry partnerships allowsstudents and university stakeholders to learn about current and future technology. Thecollaboration between LinMot Inc. USA and Purdue University Northwest (PNW
ETD 365[4] C.-C. (Brian) Chen and K. Swan, “Using Innovative and Scientifically-Based Debate to Build e-Learning Community,” Online Learning, vol. 24, no. 3, Sep. 2020, doi:https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i3.2345.[5] A. M. S. Hamouda and F. Tarlochan, “Engaging Engineering Students in Active Learning and CriticalThinking through Class Debates,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol.191, pp. 990-995,Jun.2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.379.[6] A. Alaswad and S. Junaid, “Debate as a Tool in Engineering and Sustainability Education,” in 18thInternational CDIO Conference, 2022, pp. 1003–1008. Available: http://www.cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/debate-tool-engineering-and-sustainability-education.[7] K. Chang and
. Pooley, Alison and Wanigarathna, Nadeeshani (2016) Integrating students through a multidisciplinary design project. In: Integrated Design Conference id@50, 29 June - 1 July 2016, University of Bath.2. Gerber, D. J., & Lin, S. H. E. (2014). Designing in complexity: Simulation, integration, and multidisciplinary design optimization for architecture. Simulation, 90(8), 936-959.3. 1 U.S. Energy Information Administration. April 2021. “Monthly Energy Review,” Table 2.1. https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/4. Crawley, D., Pless, S., & Torcellini, P. (2009). Getting to net zero (No. NREL/JA-550-46382). National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States).5. Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J
frameworks on students’ skill acquisition in a process safety course.References[1] Zhiqiang Gao and R. R. Rhinehart, “Theory vs. practice: The challenges from industry,” in Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference, Boston, MA, USA: IEEE, 2004, pp. 1341– 1349. doi: 10.23919/ACC.2004.1386761.[2] R. R. Rhinehart, “Understanding the Rationale Behind the Academic-Practice Gap,” Control. Accessed: Aug. 24, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.controlglobal.com/manage/asset- management/article/11303683/understanding-the-rationale-behind-the-academic-practice-gap[3] S. R. Brunhaver, R. F. Korte, S. R. Barley, and S. D. Sheppard, “Bridging the Gaps between Engineering Education and Practice,” in U.S. Engineering in a Global
YOU DEVELOP AN OUTREACH PROGRAM?The Outreach Program Creation ProcessI. Create kit to accomplish purpose(s) and meet audience needs A. Set clear goals 1. Purpose There is no point in doing outreach if you don’t have clear goals. The main purposes of the K–12 Engineering Outreach Program are to showcase new technology and to discuss educational and career opportunities in engineering disciplines. Another important goal of the program is to encourage children (especially girls and minority group members, to stay with math and science in school, even when the subject matter becomes complex and when other activities seem more
United Arab Emirates University in Al-Ain, UAE where he helped set up an innovative introductoryengineering curriculum. Dr. Tanyel received his B. S. degree in electrical engineering from Bo_aziçi University,Istanbul, Turkey in 1981, his M. S. degree in electrical engineering from Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA in1985 and his Ph. D. in biomedical engineering from Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA in 1990. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education North Midwest Section Annual Conference Copyright ” 2002, American Society for Engineering Education
secondary school district. Using BYOB in the final lab alleviated our mainconcern with Scratch–that it does not have the capability to express functions. Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference Copyright © 2013, American Society for Engineering Education 605Related WorksThere is a diverse and large body of research in the area of computer science education, focusedon primary, secondary and tertiary schools, starting in the 1970's [3]. One common theme inmany papers is the fact that learning and teaching programming is difficult [3][4][5]. Other
" 4similar to the current problem and reuses them to solve the problem (Morcous et al.,2002). Each case records problem attributes and corresponding solutions. The inference engine of a CBR system performs two main tasks: I) case retrieval bysearching the case library for the case(s) that best match the current problem; and ii) caseadaptation by revising the retrieved case(s) to fit the current problem context. A CBRsystem also supports the storage of new cases and the updating of existing cases enablingthe system to “bootstrap itself” or learn. To achieve our short-term objectives listed earlier, data from a large number ofconstruction projects completed within the last seven years will be obtained from majorconstruction companies in Omaha
, in 2000, U. S. Geological Survey, in Cooperation with the Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma,(2000). Accessed on 5/31/04 at .[6] Drinking Water Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, (5/30/04). Accessed on 5/31/04at Additional ResourcesFor additional articles on Tar Creek see this webpage set up by Miami (OK) High School students:. One may view the reports from the Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating’s Tar CreekSuperfund Task Force (2001) at .Biographical InformationCHRISTI L. PATTON is Applied Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at The Universityof Tulsa. She received her B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Texas A&M University and herM.S. in Applied Mathematics and her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from The University ofTulsa. She
Transitioning a Microcontroller Course from Assembly Language to C Steve Menhart, Ph.D. Dept. of Engineering Technology University of Arkansas at Little Rock 2801 S. University Ave. Little Rock, AR 72204 AbstractThis paper describes improvements made to an integrated lecture and laboratory course dealingwith microcontrollers, taught in the Engineering Technology Department, at the University ofArkansas at Little Rock (UALR). This course initially used the Motorola 68HC11microcontroller, but currently uses the Motorola MC9S12DP256B
, bronchitis, lung and liver cancer,parkinson and alzheimer, crohn`s disease, heart disease, and colon cancer [7,8]. 2 Figure 1: Nanomaterials in different products that are used in daily life. Figure 2: The entrance of various nanoparticles into human body. 2. SURFACE PROPERTIS OF NANOMATERIALS The surface chemistry (e.g., surface potential, particle size and surface area) are thedominating factors for the toxicity of nanomaterials. These materials can react with the body,stay inert, and/or interact with the system based on their surface properties [2]. Some of theproperties of nanoparticles are summarized below:2.1 Particle size It is stated
, “well-rounded Renaissance Engineer”[s] [3]. Turns, Atman, et al., [4] use thesereports as an input to what an engineer needs to know. Dym, et al. present how engineeringeducation is being challenged to require students to consider additional design constraintsrequired as part of “new fundamentals” [5]. In response to this challenge, the CoE at WSU is aleader in reshaping the undergraduate experience to prepare the engineer of 2020, and at thesame time make the educational experience more meaningful to the student and the student moredesirable to local and national industries. As such, the CoE requires that for an Engineering BSdegree at WSU, each student will complete the program course requirements and at least three ofthe following six
Learning by engagement and empowerment - a pragmatic approach to enhance student engagement in a service course and developing relevance of such a course to their own majorsBijaya Shrestha, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Missouri S&TAbstractNew pedagogical approaches are developed and implemented in a service course in orderto enhance the engagement of students in the learning process. Service courses are oftenperceived to be non-relevant and lame by majority of engineering students. The newapproaches bring a climate where students are provided with opportunities to take chargeand explore. The idea behind the new approach is built around a good mix of technologywith old tools of the trade so as to
ECE686 courseeducational activities into the ECE686 course. knowledge with relay test system experiment and 4.2 Methodology The methodology of the experiment and demonstration is based on RTS-AMS with demonstration. 2. Course Integration relay/s in the loop. The pre-fault, fault, and post-fault states and breaker status are
development, 3) lecture highlights, 4) example problem(s),and 5) group work. The instructional team consisted of the professor, two graduate teachingassistants, and two undergraduate teaching fellows (UGTFs). Undergraduate teaching fellowswere undergraduates who had recently done well in the course and were embedded into thecourse to help with active-learning activities. The instructor, GTAs, and UGTFs walked aroundduring the group work time to assist groups and/or individuals with questions.Description of Homework Systems: In Fall 2017, the homework system changed compared toSpring 2017. The instructional team developed new homework problems, and a commonhomework template (example shown in Figure 4 at end of paper). The template included
, and then reconsider their own work afterlearning from another’s design.ReferencesAdams, R.S., Turns, J., and Atman, C.J. (2003). “Educating effective engineering designers: Therole of reflective practice”. Design Studies, 24 (3), 10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00056-X, 275-294.Alley, M. (2017). “Assertion-Evidence Approach.” (May 17, 2017).Davis, D., Beyerlein, S., Thompson, P., McCormack, J., Harrison, O., Trevisan, M., Gerlick, R.,and Howe, S., (2009). “Assessing design and reflective practice in capstone engineering designcourses.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.Layton, R. A., Loughry, M. L., Ohland, M. W., and Ricco, G. D. (2010). “Design and validationof a web-based system for assigning members to
to an in-campus course when all of the aforesaid resources are available.STATICS Online Asad Esmaeily, PhD, PEReferences:Gramoll, K. (1999, June). Teaching Statics online with only electronic media on laptop computers. In theProceedings of the ASEE 1999 Annual Meeting, Charlotte, NC, CD-ROM Session (Vol. 1668).Rutz, E., Eckart, R., E Wade, J., Maltbie, C., Rafter, C., & Elkins, V. (2003). Student Performance andAcceptance of Instructional Technology: Comparing Technology‐Enhanced and Traditional Instructionfor a Course in Statics. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(2), 133-140.Dollár, A., & Steif, P. S. (2007). An interactive online course on Engineering Statics
oriented throughout high school. In college, youwill be more successful if you start thinking in terms of mastery” (2)One of the authors has been teaching freshmen for over 25 years. At the end ofthe fall 2009 semester, one of his students came up to him and stated that he, a freshmenin engineering, was ENTITLED to high grades. The professor was astounded and herebutted that this was definitely not the case. Where did the student develop such anattitude? Maybe this attitude grew from the feeling that since the student, or the student‟sparents are paying for the student‟s education, that high grades are deserved. Or maybe itis because parents have control of our high schools and high grades are given to quiet anyrebellion from parents. After all
necessary to involve faculty from computer securityand faculty from biology to break the traditional professional boundaries.Reference[1] Cray, S. (1996). “An imaginary tour of a biological computer (why computer professionals and molecularbiologists should start collaborating)”, Remarks of Seymour Cray to the Shannon Center for Advanced Studies,University of Virginia. Retrieved on September 23, 2011 from http://www.cccp2000.com/cray.html[2] Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., &Walter, P. (2007). Molecular Biology of the Cell (5thedition), Garland Science.[3] Dasgupta, D. (2006). Advances in artificial immune systems. IEEE Computational IntelligenceMagazine, 1(4): 40-49.[4] Forrest, S., Somayaji, A., & Ackley, D
. Wiley & Sons, NY, 2009 7. Dinehart, D., Gross, S., Yost, J., Radlinska, A., “The Role of Structural Engineering in Multi-Disciplinary Freshmen Projects”, ASEE 2010 Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, June. 8. Caverly, R., Fulmer, H., Santhanam, S., Singh, P., O’Brien, J., Jones, G., Char, E., Mercede, F., Weinstein, R., Yost, J., “Project-based freshmen engineering experience: The Core Course,” 2010 ASEE Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, June. 9. Welty, J.R., Wicks, C.E., Wilson, R.E., Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer, 3 rd ed., J.Wiley & Sons, NY, 1984. pp. 624-626. 10. Fogler, H.S., “Using the Senior Unit Operations Laboratory to Develop Troubleshooting Skills and to Ease
://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2. Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics. American Association of University Women: Washington, DC. Retrieved fromhttp://www.aauw.org/learn/research/upload/whysofew.pdf3. Lord, S.M, Camacho, M.M., Layton, R.A., Long, R.A., Ohland, M.W., & Washburn, M.H. (2009). Who’spersisting in engineering? A comparative analysis of female and male Asian, Black, Hispanic, Native American andWhite students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 15, 167-190.4. Donaldson, K., Lichtenstein, G., & Sheppard, S. (2008). Socioeconomic status and the undergraduate engineeringexperience: Preliminary findings from four American
, project-based approach for undergraduate heat transfer instruction”,2001 ASEE Annual Conference, Albuquerque, 2001.7. Fleischmann, S., Sozen, M., and Mokhtar, W., “A Green Heat Transfer Design Project to IntroduceGlobalization and Society Awareness”, ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress &Exposition, Paper no: IMECE2010-38285, November 12-18, 2010.8. Leifer, J., “An Active Learning Design Project for a Junior-Level Kinematics and Dynamics Class”, 32ndASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, November 20029. Crone, W., “Using an Advanced Mechanics of Materials Design Project to Enhance Learning in an IntroductoryMechanics of Materials Course”, The 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference