Education”drawings and floor plans and completed comparative assessments for each of the finaldesigns. The second design project involved the application of a computer-aided design(CAD) software package that guides the user through the design of a truss-type highwaybridge, based on a specified design scenario; design submittals included isometric andelevation drawings for this unique commercial engineering application. Finally, students’end-of-course assessments are used to validate the effectiveness of the projects. Due tospace limitations, examples of student solutions are not included; however, the author canprovide copies of student solutions to interested educators upon request.Project #1: Residential DesignThis initial project buildson
Session 1347 Outreach Degree Completion Program Michael B. Spektor, Malcolm Grothe, Walter W. Buchanan Oregon Institute of Technology/The Boeing Company/Northeastern UniversityI. IntroductionIn our previous paper entitled “Delivering a Manufacturing Engineering Technology Program toBoeing Company”, in June of 1999, we reported about the mutual educational project betweenOIT and Boeing.1 In this paper we address the Initial Plan, Memorandum of Understanding,First Academic Quarter, Lessons Learned, and our Future Plan. All of the recommendationsfrom the earlier paper have been achieved during this academic year
offour semesters at IRE, the students are required to write four technical reports describing allaspect of the design projects in addition to writing business plan, personal improvement plan andexperiment reports for all the technical competencies. The IRE students graduate with a Bachelorof Science in general engineering from Minnesota State University, Mankato.The goal of the program is to producing graduates with significant integrated technical andprofessional knowledge and skills who will help the economic development of the region. Themajority of the student learning occurs in the context of industry engineering projects, in contrastto the traditional distinctly topical engineering classes. The IRE program values skills such asstrong
activities were scheduled on Monday thru Friday from8:00 am to 5:00 pm. Award of certifications were presented on the last day, Friday, July 22,2011. As for the subject matter in the profession, two sessions accomplished a very importantportion of the program. One was on “Engineering design projects using AutoCAD” and the otherwas “Lego robot session” followed by “Lego robot competition for the participants”. Winners ofthe competition were recognized.Program planning included first, seeking adequate collaboration from local schools, UnitedIndependent School District (UISD), Laredo Independent School District (LISD), and other areaeducational academies. A website was developed to provide details about the program, includingapplication material. A
engineeringconference, and 3) the asphalt paving conference. The planning of each of these conferencesinvolves the faculty and representatives of local industry. The conferences present invitedspeakers as well as faculty presentations that address the needs of the respective engineeringparticipants.The engineering community has, in recent years, requested a different form of continuingeducation. The degree programs do not address the needs of those who do not desire anadvanced degree. The conferences address a different need than the degree programs, but theypresent a scheduling problem in that it is necessary to miss an entire day of work in order toattend the conference. This can be difficult, in some cases, due to project deadlines, etc. In anattempt to
flexibility in developing an Page 5.19.2individualized plan of study to prepare the individual for attaining these career goals. It is importantto note that the Master of Science (M.S.) Degree in Technology for Full-time Professionals consists 2of the same basic course composition as the existing on-campus M.S. in Technology. Only themethod of instructional delivery is different. The noted one exception is that students enrolled in thenew program will not register for a directed project. Instead, students will complete a three credithour independent study requirement as the replacement. The
compared the experimental Page 3.212.2pressure distribution with the one-dimensional isentropic nozzle flow. Their results arepresented in Figs. 4 and 5.Comments and Future Plan for the use of apparatus in I: The system developed by thestudents is not exclusively dedicated to the nozzle experiment. The whole system is mobile ona cart and can be used to make pressure measurements in other experiments and in other labs.Currently the pressure wafer is operated manually. The plan is to buy a Scanivalve DigitalInterface Unit (SDIU) to control the scan cycle and place the measured values and address inmemory which can then be retrieved by the host computer
provide an in-depth look at what Computer Integrated Manufacturing is all about and what will be coming asthe students’ progress. Some examples are:• How CIM can address many of the problems of manufacturing companies.• A look ahead at the plan of study for the next four years.• Introductions to the faculty, administrators and courses that make up the program.• Visits to various sites on campus.• Presentations about the CIM related student organizations and support services on campus.• A look at some of the history and customs of the Purdue campus.The course helps students get to know each other and start off with a better understanding of thechallenges and opportunities which lie ahead.Background: During the early 1990s a major effort was made
Session 2347 Expectations for Faculty Development in Engineering Technology Walter W. Buchanan Oregon Institute of Technology AbstractThere is probably nothing more important to a new faculty member than to find out what isexpected to achieve promotion and tenure. In many institutions, however, what is expected toachieve these goals is vague and unclear. This article lays out ways an institution can make itclear to a new faculty member what needs to be done to have a good chance to achievepromotion and tenure through a realistic plan of
civil engineers in professional practice. • Develop a long-range plan for professional development.To accomplish these objectives, the original CE400A program of instruction consisted of a seriesof seminars, case studies, and guest lectures by civil engineering practitioners, as well as aprofessional reading requirement. Students were required to keep journals documenting theirobservations, insights, criticisms, and questions about each of the lessons in the course. Thejournals served the dual purpose of assessing student learning and assigning a grade for thecourse.I have served as the course director and principal instructor of CE400A since it was first offeredin Academic Year 1995-96. At the conclusion of this first year
part programming. These skills need to leverage newcapabilities in CAM tool path generation to be considered during process planning to improvemachining efficiency, the greater ease of programming multi-axis CNC machines, moresophisticated verification tools that can challenge visualization skills, metrology techniques thatassist in understanding the impact of planning choices, and even ways to monitor a process duringmachining such as measuring the cutting forces generated.In the sections that follow, how these capabilities are impactful to the extent that they need to beincluded in the curriculum will be discussed. The resources that a program needs to invest in tosupport doing this will be summarized, and examples of classes where their use
with the tooland familiarize them with formal property verification using assertions. A final project isintroduced, which allows students to create a validation plan for a design of their choice andvalidate it using the applications of the VC Formal tool.While designing the track for assertion-based verification, we designed the coursework to be easyto understand for students with no background in formal logic, no previous knowledge of formalproperty verification, and no background in the VC Formal tool. For that reason, the course isdivided into three phases: Introduction, Setup, and Assertion-Based Verification. The introductionphase is designed to familiarize students with formal property verification concepts. The setupphase introduces
://www.cetl.gatech.edustudents/step/overview.htm). STEP Fellows partner with metro area high school teams led by masterteacher-coordinators. STEP Fellows participate in summer training workshops where they learnabout inquiry-based learning pedagogy, classroom management, effective teaching skills, andappropriate uses of educational technologies. Fellows also work with K-12 personnel to developa needs assessment and action plan for the school. During the school year, Fellows work in teams(typically two of our students) with their partner school, engaging in activities such as (a)instructing students, (b) assisting with teacher professional development, (c) providing studentenrichment and mentoring, (d) creating and implementing classroom websites, (e) assisting
design and implement alternative energy systems.Oral Presentation Towards the end of the workshop, each participant was given a topic to research on andthey made an oral presentation to the class. Some of the topics are “Application of solar power”,“Application of wind power”, “Electric safety”, “History of solar power and wind power”, “Solarand wind power hybrid systems” and “Helpful websites for experiments and lesson plans relatedto solar and wind technology”.Lesson Plans Each participant wrote an inquiry-based lesson plan in solar and wind power technology,and electricity after attending the ETI institute. Inquiry-based learning incorporatesinterdisciplinary study, critical thinking skills, and structured research considering
-Based Graduate Course in Advanced Quality ToolsAbstractThis paper examines in detail the development of a graduate-level ManufacturingEngineering Technology course in advanced quality tools. All areas of modern industryhave adopted a standardized set of tools and methods used in designing processes andcommunicating their performance. These cover a wide range of individual tools, fromProcess Failure Mode Effect Analysis (PFMEA) and Control Plans through the AdvancedProduct Quality Planning (APQP) and Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) totechniques such as 8 (or 9) Disciplines (8D or 9D) and related tools. These, combinedwith project management elements defined by the Six Sigma methodology such asDefine
programs within that organization • WFEO Committee on Capacity Building, to provide an action oriented program for forward motionUNESCO plans for capacity buildingIn 2003, the United States of America rejoined UNESCO after an absence of 18 years.The US government indicated to UNESCO that it wanted a significant portion of theincreased funds that it would provide to its budget to be allocated to enhancing itsprograms in engineering and engineering education. A major proposal on how to mountan enhanced program, entitled “Engineering for a Better World”, has been developed bythe US engineering community and UNESCO’s engineering staff and submitted toUNESCO for consideration.The overall objectives of the “Engineering for a Better World
engineeringworkforce. For non-engineers, the mathematics and physics concepts may be daunting when theyneed such knowledge to perform their job responsibilities in a meaningful way. In the workforce,such knowledge gaps may occur, and one such instance is the hydraulics knowledge needed bythe environmental health specialists working for the state Department of Public Health (DPH) toexamine swimming pool plans prior to approval. An agreement was reached between a publicuniversity and the DPH to meet this need for engineering education. This work focused ontraining to help in developing a non-engineering workforce to understand fundamentalengineering concepts related to hydraulics. The training was divided into two portions: aclassroom lecture and accompanying
planning, and leadership skills. Dr. Singleton is enthusiastic about educating professionals and students to advance their business and academic endeavors using project management competencies, tools, techniques, and leadership. The purpose of this paper, Project Management Principles for Engineers: A Course Module, is to introduce the 12 Project Management Principles to engineering students to influence their behavior in future project environments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference Project Management Principles for Engineers: A Course ModuleAbstractProject engineers should have the appropriate technical and
discussion of how our plan provides us with critical and timely information aboutwhat, and how, our physics students are learning will be presented. While assessment is oftennot viewed as a favorite item on the “to do” list of any faculty member or administrator, we havefound enormous value in the continued attention we place on our annual assessment efforts. Wehope that by sharing the evolution of our curricular efforts, others will find useful ideas andstrategies that could be adapted to an existing assessment plan; or, that could be used to helpbuild the foundation for a new one. The overarching goal of this paper is to share successfultechniques that we’ve used to assess student learning. We hope these techniques will be usefulfor others as
tools. In the Spring semester, course topics focus onprofessional development, academic planning, and expanding basic engineering problem solvingskills.Proceedings of the 2012 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 3Fall Semester Topics Syllabus and Policies For many students, the fall semester of college is first time they are given a syllabus for a course. Therefore, the syllabus is discussed in detail. Students are also introduced to the FEP Assignment, Conduct, and Grading Policies. The FEP Assignment Policy clearly defines the guidelines for properly formatting handwritten
Computer Simulation and Analysis of High-precision Automated Assembly Line in Telecommunication Industry Wei Pan Yingbin Shi Advisor: Prof. Jeremy Li Session: Tools, techniques, and best practices of engineering education for the digital ageAbstractIn this project, a mechanism for inserting assembly technology is described. The process isseparated into two portions: pick-up and assembly. In the pick-up portion, process planning forindustry assembly is a very complex task, which is mostly dependent upon the combination ofexperience along with up-to-date assembly technology. Attempts to simulate the automatedassembly process have been largely unsuccessful and it remains a difficult task
, discussions, and oralinterest solving energy issues, and spread awareness across their presentations; and to improve student skills in critical thinkingown communities. and problem solving, especially engineering problem solving, Keywords—renewable; sustainable; curriculum; and sharpen student skills in math and science. The variouseducation; energy; awareness; lesson plans; wind lessons plans are framed around a hands-on wind turbine project to achieve these objectives. I
werepetroleum-related. The remainder of the projects were provided and sometimessponsored by faculty. In addition to the client-provided “engineer-in-charge,” each team Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas Tech University Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationwas assigned a faculty advisor. Short, weekly progress reports were submitted to thecourse instructor. Formal written and oral proposals and final reports were required fromeach team. There were also several other individual “reporting documents.” The coursealso had considerable content, e.g., the design process, oral and written communications,project planning, risk analysis
through the undergraduate or graduate curriculum. Effective academicadvising is considered a core requirement for student success in engineering programs. It mayoccasionally involve mentoring students in areas and activities related to their professionalsuccess such as advising on internships, co-ops, and industry-institute collaborated curricularprograms.Several strategies have been developed over the years to streamline the process and make it lesstaxing for both faculty and students. Among them are degree planning software, databasemanagement, online resources portal, office of undergraduate advisor, on campus student supportservices, student wellness, and experiential learning opportunities, to name a few.With the recent COVID crisis, as the
continueas a cohort in ME Fundamentals 2 during Spring 2023. The pilot cohort represents approximately 16% ofthe total enrollment of first-year mechanical engineering students at our institution. The literature supportsthe importance of first-year experiences with the major; however, our current ME program of study doesnot directly engage our majors until mid-way in year two as sophomores. While our pilot implementationis not conducting a rigorous engineering education research plan, we are undertaking various directmeasures of course delivery and student achievement with cognitive and affective domain learningobjectives. We anticipate conducting longitudinal tracking of the cohort as they progress through the major,with the hypothesis that we
education, how do we prepare ourstudents to engage in these technological practices in addition to the fundamental concepts ofconstruction planning and management? As BIM has been the focus of technological innovation in recent decades, severaluniversities have developed BIM-integrated curriculums for students of construction engineeringand management (CEM), but they represent only a handful of a large number of such programsavailable worldwide [10, 11], and in addition, there is significant diversity in their content. Atechnology education framework for CEM programs is needed to aid educators in establishingcoherent and comprehensive curricula, both within existing courses and by introducing newcourses. The curriculum is the foundation of
California, Irvine (Irvine, California) and a B.S. from the University of Florida (Gainesville, Florida). She teaches graduate classes on transportation planning and transportation data analysis. Dr. Hernandez is the faculty advisor for the student chapter of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and a member of ITE. Her research focuses on new and advanced technology applications in transportation systems engineering and is cen- tered on developing tools and methods to collect and analyze freight and commercial vehicle operations data for long range freight planning. Her project portfolio includes work for the Arkansas Department of Transportation, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the National Science Foundation
curriculum and AI concepts. This research focuses onleveraging 6th and 7th-grade science curricula related to state standards to introduce machine learningconcepts by using fossil shark teeth. Researchers from engineering, education, and paleontologycollaboratively developed learning modules to upskill Title I schoolteachers to meaningfully integrate AIfundamentals within their existing curriculum. With a special emphasis on machine learning (ML), fivelesson plans were presented during a week-long teacher professional development. Teachers conceptualizedand implemented ML models that distinguish fossil shark teeth by their taxonomy and primary functionsto recognize ecological and evolutionary patterns. After introducing a lesson, each teacher
international accreditationmovements of business schools around the world, is of interest to the management of curricula assystematic processes and assessment plans that collectively demonstrate that students achievecompetences of learning for the programs in which they participate. The objective of this work is toanalyze the implementation of the management of learning process at Unisinos University’sPolytechnic School, examining its impact on the curriculum management from the programcoordinators' perspective. This implementation process was designed as a training program forcoordinators of the 19 undergrad programs involved aiming at their development as managers of theprocess as the get involved in the process itself and organized in different
selected your major, who, if anyone, were asked about their contributed to your choice? What courses, if any, prepared you major selection and for your major? influences on deciding 2. What factors/characteristics are required for success in your on that major. major? 3. How important are technical in your major? Professional skills? Section 2. Participants 1. What elective track/specialization have you selected/plan to select were asked about their within your major? Why? specialization or 2. What factors/characteristics are required for success in your area elective track within of specialization? their major. 3. What are the ways, outside of coursework