Conference Session

First-Year Programs (FPD) Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alyssa N Berg, University of Colorado Boulder; Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado at Boulder; Virginia Lea Ferguson, Mechanical Engineering; University of Colorado; Boulder, CO; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

beginningtheir research. The students also complete a post-research survey about their experiences. Theundergraduate students gain practical research experience and demonstrate theiraccomplishments in an end-of-semester poster presentation. Both the undergraduates andgraduate mentors complete weekly qualitative reflective questions through an online process.Through both the pre- and post- surveys, as well as reflective questions posed during thesemester, the research team gathered information on maintaining and creating trust in thesementoring relationships. We compared and contrasted our mentor-mentee relationship to theperceived trust model created by Mayer, Davis, and Schoorman1. Our initial findings show thatability, benevolence, and integrity are

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 9: Lessons Learned from Engineering Graduate Programs

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ann M. Gansemer-Topf; Shan Jiang, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Yiqi Liang, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Dong Chen, The University of Arizona

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

-surveys that focused on thequestion, "What influence did the course have on students’ knowledge and application of PMskills?”Course OverviewThe GAPS course (MSE 580x), Introduction of Project Management for Thesis Research, aimsto improve graduate STEM students' efficiency in completing their thesis research and projectsby adapting the PM skills and concepts. This one-credit, satisfactory-fail semester-long course isoffered once a week for 50 - 80 minutes. Students learn PM processes such as Work Break DownStructure and Critical Path and tools like the Project Charter and Gantt Charts. Although thecourse's primary focus is PM skills, throughout the semester, students have the opportunity todevelop other skills such as communication, reflective

Conference Session

Global Roles and Societal Responsibilities of Engineers

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eunjeong Ma, Pohang University of Science and Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

silenced and highlighted inthe process of shaping hybrid pedagogies and engineering by reflecting on and assessing thenature of “hybridity,” “innovation,” and “design” in engineering education. Introduction During the late 2000s, the South Korean government identified the need to prioritizescience and technology policy in the university sector, specifically in the area of informationand communication technologies, with the aim of developing global leaders. A concerningissue of a "crisis in science and engineering fields" was identified, whereby many youngstudents were disinclined to pursue science and technology careers. In response, thegovernment initiated an effort to attract talented young

Conference Session

Technical Session 3 - Paper 5: Fostering a Supportive Mentoring Space During a Global Pandemic

Collection

2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)

Authors

Matthew Voigt, Clemson University; Eliza Gallagher, Clemson University; Rachel Lanning, Clemson University ; Tony Nguyen, Clemson University; Sharetta M. Bufford M.Ed., Clemson University; Tyler James Sullivan, Clemson University; Tim Ransom, Clemson University; Wysheka Austin, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity

the group that contributed to the fostering of asupportive mentoring space. The faculty mentors had extensive experience in qualitativemethodologies and supported emerging scholars in reflective methods.Based on our autoethnographic reflection we identified three structures and four practicesthat contributed to the developed of our supportive mentoring space.Structures that emerged as key to foster a supportive mentoring space ● Weekly research group meetings ● Asynchronous reading group ● Paired progress meetingsPractices that emerged as key to fostering a supportive mentoring space ● Norms for participation were generated, discussed, and named ● Attending to emotional and personal well-being ● Focus

Conference Session

COED: Grading Systems

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carlos Rojas, San Jose State University; Gina M. Quan, San Jose State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

card. Of the 83 students in the course,the number of completed surveys ranged from 12 to 18 participants, and we had 69 completesurveys throughout the semester. Rojas did not have access to the survey data until the end ofthe semester, but Quan occasionally shared broad patterns as formative feedback during thesemester.To capture the instructor's perspectives on the course as well as how the implementation ofmastery grading shifted over time, Rojas engaged in regular reflective journaling. We alsocollected documents and artifacts associated with the course including emails to and fromstudents which discussed mastery grading and syllabi from the focal semester and previoussemesters. We also viewed student course evaluations administered by the

Conference Session

Technical Session T1B

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Amanda Marie Singer, Michigan Technological University; Katrina L Carlson, Michigan Technological University; Akua B. Oppong-Anane, Montana Technological University; Michelle E Jarvie-Eggart P.E., Michigan Technological University; Sarah Tan, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Full Papers

relationships reported amongst respondents? 2. How do the results obtained from the previous study compare to the findings of this cross- university study?Study DesignTo further examine the role of familial influence on student engineering major choice, this studyemploys a multi-methods approach facilitated through a survey with both quantitative andqualitative components. Data obtained from elements of the survey were first analyzedindependently from each other. These independent analyses were followed by a combinedinterpretation phase that sought to understand the results in reflection of one another. To aid inthe analysis and interpretation of results, Social Cognitive Career Theory is used as a theoreticalframework for this

Collection

ASEE Zone 1 Conference - Spring 2023

Authors

Jennifer Shaffer Brown, Clemson University; Emma Katherine Buell, Clemson University; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University; Karen A High, Clemson University

reflections, one difficulty experienced by graduate students is thatoftentimes, they lack a common language to adequately articulate their skillsets and areas ofimprovement, especially in aspects of research that they have not received as much exposure to[8]–[10]. This inability to articulate which skills they need assistance in developing can addadditional layers of difficulty in mentoring relationships with advisors and supervisors, as it maynot be clear where mentors ought to focus their efforts based on mentees’ needs and career goals.In short, a common language or professional competency framework was needed to helpgraduate students map the larger landscape of prominent skillsets that they ought to nurture toexcel in a research career in

Conference Session

Student Division Technical 1: Diversity, Equity, Inclusivity (DEI)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cassandra McCall, Utah State University; Layla Araiinejad, Auburn University; Thomas Heaps, Utah State University; Wade Goodridge, Utah State University; Brooke Cochran, University of Colorado Boulder

by helping students “perceive their growing competenceand ability to perform engineering related tasks” [10]. Examples of these assessment typesinclude course projects, e-portfolios, and other means for students to build and demonstrate theirknowledge that are conducive to their own interests and consider the multiple intersections ofstudents’ social identities [10].Such feedback is also important for adopting unconventional assessment approaches or those thatstudents have not yet been exposed to. For example, Morton et al. [11] found that students didnot appear to possess an innate capacity for in-depth levels of reflection regardless of assessmenttype. Therefore, it is important for faculty to provide opportunities for students to

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Technical Session 4: Curriculum and Programmatic Effects

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keilin Jahnke, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

-minute lesson to teach a small peer group about the content of an episode of the NPR How I BuiltThis podcast through a brief lecture, engaging activity, and a discussion or quiz as a means ofassessment. This activity exposes students to the paths that various innovators took in theirentrepreneurial journeys to demystify the process of innovation and provide inspiration throughstorytelling.The third primary assessment mechanism is an individual innovation map and synthesis. Theobjective of this assignment is to provide a formal means for students to reflect on potential nextsteps in their entrepreneurial journey after the course ends and synthesize their understanding ofthe entrepreneurial mindset and their role as an innovation leader. Students

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chrysanthe Preza, The University of Memphis; Stephanie S Ivey, The University of Memphis; Craig O. Stewart, University of Memphis

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

engineeringbackgrounds, as well their hands-on research experience and working on a paper. However,many students felt there was not enough time in the course for research and writing. Othernegative experiences included feeling they did not understand the purpose of assignments on thecourse learning management system and other team members were not contributing. At thebeginning of the semester, assignments focused on ethics, teaming, how to do a literature reviewand document research, and other preliminary topics. Students wanted to dive right into theresearch rather than completing training and pre-research activities. Additionally, journalassignments requested that students reflect on their experiences weekly. Engineering students arenot accustomed to

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi Sherick, University of Michigan; Pauline Khan, University of Michigan; Tershia Pinder-Grover, University of Michigan; Deborah Covington, University of Michigan

around diversity, equity, and inclusion during ASEE’s “Year of Impact onRacial Equity” and beyond.Communication, calibration, and consistency were key to alignment as we reflect on the process.In addition, as committees were composed (See Appendix B), there was an intentional effort todiversify their composition, allowing for representation from job roles, faculty rank, anddepartments. Critical to the process was the active reflection and analysis of power, privilege,identity and motivations while the work was happening. Similarly, we used critical questioningexpertise to bring clarity to the problem, add context, and generate ideas. This is similar to otherproblem-solving techniques; however, the coupling of the reflection and purposefulness

Collection

ASEE-NE 2022

Authors

Allan Estuardo Rodas, Raytheon Company; Kai Ren, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

GHz) which covers the wholeUWB frequency range. The size of the proposed antenna is (29.28×42.90) 𝒎𝒎𝟐 printedon 0.813 mm thickness Rogers RO4003C substrate with permittivity 3.55, and the Vivaldiantenna models were simulated using Altair FEKO full-wave simulation software basedon the Method of Moments (MoM). Keywords—Vivaldi antenna, tapered slot antenna (TSA), Ultra-Wideband (UWB),microwave imaging, Non-Destructive Testing (NDT), Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV),drone, electromagnetic (EM) waves, radiation pattern, end-fire, frequency range, bandwidth(BW), reflection coefficient ( 𝑺𝟏𝟏 ), Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR), half-powerbeamwidth (HPBW), realized gain, downrange resolution, cross-range resolution,Microstrip to Slot line (M

Conference Session

Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Patrick Cunningham, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Cheryl Carrico P.E., E4S, LLC; Rachel McCord Ellestad, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Stacy Tantum, Duke University; Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University; Rebecca Simmons, Duke University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

Paper ID #32676Supporting Students’ Skillful Learning: Lessons Learned from a FacultyDevelopment WorkshopDr. Patrick Cunningham, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Patrick Cunningham is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technol- ogy. His professional development is focused on researching and promoting metacognition, self-regulated learning, and reflection among students and faculty in Engineering Education. Dr. Cunningham has been a PI/Co-PI on two NSF-funded grants and led Rose-Hulman’s participation in the Consortium to Pro- mote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE). He is also a

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer Kouo, Towson University; Stacy S. Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University; Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; W. Ethan Eagle, University of Maryland

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

PD was shifted online to a mixtureof synchronous and asynchronous sessions during the summer of 2020. The goal of this work inprogress is to present how the e4usa team adapted teacher PD to establish community amongour teachers and between teachers and staff, use this connection to enhance ourresponsiveness in PD, and deliver the engaging content of the e4usa curriculum. Teachersengaging remotely in e4usa activities have led to productive adaptations based on theirchallenges. The lessons learned reflecting back upon the PD will inform the design, delivery,and content of future e4usa teacher PDs. It is expected that future PD and professional learningofferings will continue to utilize flexible modalities and novel online tools, while also

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Goli Nossoni, University of New Haven

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Education, 2021 Work in progress: Personality Types and Learning Preferences of First-Year Gen Z Engineering StudentsAbstractHumans learn based on their strengths and weaknesses. Many researchers have studied thecorrelation between the delivery method in classrooms and students’ learning preferences. Learningpreferences can include active, reflective, sensing, intuitive, visual, verbal, sequential and globalstyles. Researchers have studied engineering students’ learning styles to help instructors in theclassroom adjust the method of delivery and strategy to enhance student learning outcomes.However, few studies have related the personality of engineering students and their learningpreferences. Further, the few studies

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ramya Sivaraj, University of Minnesota; Jeanna R. Wieselmann, Southern Methodist University; Gillian Roehrig, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

scope of set criteria andconstraints to collaborate toward innovation; b) utilizing design failure to better understand theproblems in context; and c) contributing as a group to iterative-reflective cycles. Findingscontribute to enhancing K-12 engineering teaching and learning with a focus on collaborativeproblem-solving throughout the engineering design process. Findings of this study also havesignificant implications related to the structure and design of small group collaborative K-12engineering learning experiences.EPISTEMIC PRACTICES OF ENGINEERING IN SMALL GROUP CONTEXTS 2Designing Solutions in Middle School Engineering: An Exploration of Epistemic Practices of Engineering in Small

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Paul Benjamin Crilly, U.S. Coast Guard Academy

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics

frequencies greater than 1 MHz, the ground losses are suchthat the signal will be severely attenuated. The amount of loss depends on the earth’sconductivity along that path. The surface wave is illustrated in Figure 1. (c) Troposphericbending, where dense air masses in the earth’s troposphere will cause refraction of radio waves.Occurance of tropospheric bending is a transient phenomenona, but sometimes enablescommunication distances of hundreds of mile at frequencies above 50 MHz [2]. (d) Reflectionand diffraction - the earth’s terrain or man-made objects can sometimes enable waves to travelbeyond the normal line of sight distances via diffraction or reflection[1,2].Ionosphere layers – Gas ionization is a process whereby a gas atom or molecule

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Diane L. Nelson, Carnegie Mellon University; Ilhem F. Hakem, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

learned how to sketch basic process flowsheets, made bath bombs (soap fizzies) [9, 11],measured their lung capacity after blowing bubbles from soap solutions, calculated their carbonfootprint and were asked to reflect on a cow’s breath as well as an industrial plant and theenvironmental effects of energy use for bioplastic manufacturing.Given the relevance and scope of the plastics crisis, we spent the majority of the class exploringhow plastics contribute to waste and what strategies exist to alleviate this problem. Studentslearned how bioplastics are made from renewable biomass such as vegetable fats, oils, corn-starch,milk and other bio resources. They explored biodegradability and what components in cornstarchand milk could make effective

Conference Session

Issues in the First Year - Focus on Self-Efficacy

Collection

2017 FYEE Conference

Authors

Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

FYEE Division - Paper Submission

pedagogy, reflective learn- ing and critical thinking as aids to enhanced student learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 You Might (or Might Not) Know More Than You Thought: Student Self-Perception vs. Performance in First Year Engineering Graphics and Computer Programming Natalie Van Tyne Virginia Polytechnic Institute, nvantyne@vt.eduAbstract - The results of a beginning of semester survey of efficacy, namely performance accomplishment,students’ current abilities in engineering graphics and

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talks

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John McNeill, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Richard F. Vaz, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Vinayak Ashok Prabhu, Nanyang Polytechnic; Rajani Shankar; Cherine Meng Fong Tan, Nanyang Polytechnic; Larry Keng tee Seow; Lee Raphael, Nanyang Polytecnic

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

challenge and open-endedness. 3. Sustained Inquiry: Plan for an extended period to allow students to learn new topics and explore issues in some depth. 4. Authenticity: Motivate students with problems that connect to applications in the world around them. 5. Student Voice & Choice: Provide students with opportunities to select goals, approaches, and/or evaluation procedures for their work. 6. Reflection: Provide opportunities for students to reflect on their learning, consider what they might have done differently, and connect learning to future work. 7. Critique & Revision: Scaffold PBL with interim assignments, and provide formative feedback for improvement. 8. Public Product: Make student work evident

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Martina Margaret Moyne, University College Dublin; Maxwell Herman, Harvard University; Conor Walsh P.E., Harvard University; Donal Padraic Holland, University College Dublin

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

education, and a case study to demonstrate its capabilitiesas a method of collecting and analyzing data from student design teams. The system isintended to support educators in coaching and monitoring student designers, encouragestudents in reflective reporting on their experiential learning, and to serve as a data collectiontool for education researchers.This poster also presents the results of a case study of a proposed framework involving DEFTdata to evaluate project-based design courses. The research consisted of interviews with thelead instructor of the classes (n=1), weekly observation of the student groups and the analysisof self-reported student design process data (n=12) to review the efficacy of the design class.The poster concludes by

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew D. Lovell P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

also surveyedto determine their perception of the enhanced specification course versus that of other traditionalcourses they have taken in the past. Finally, this paper includes a reflection of theimplementation of specification grading, a reflection on the appropriate competencies forreinforced concrete design, and the potential benefits for use in broader civil engineeringeducation.Introduction and BackgroundA picture of traditional grading as providing constructive feedback and serving as an impactfullearning device sounds both noble and desirable. However, traditional grading, at least intraditional engineering courses, often falls short. Rather than profound guidance, grading oftenmanifests itself as a cutthroat point competition

Conference Session

Our Future in Manufacturing: STEM Outreach

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Terence Fagan, Central Piedmont Community College

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

the Learn and Serve Clearinghouse, “Service-learning combinesservice objectives with learning objectives with the intent that the activity changes both therecipient and the provider of the service. This is accomplished by combining service tasks withstructured opportunities that link the task to self-reflection, self-discovery, and the acquisitionand comprehension of values, skills, and knowledge content.”10 By incorporating servicelearning into this freshman engineering course, there were three main goals; collaborate withstudents of different study areas in order to gain communication skills necessary in theengineering workforce, apply engineering ideas to social issues that affect local communityschools and students in k-12, and increase

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Krupczak, Hope College; Timothy Simpson, Pennsylvania State University; Vince Bertsch, Santa Rosa Junior College; Kate Disney, Mission College; Elsa Garmire, Dartmouth College

developed and comparisons to otherdisciplines, four standard models were identified: • The Technology Survey Course. • The Technology Focus or Topics Course. • The Technology Creation Course (Design Course). • The Technology Critique, Assess, Reflect, or Connect Course.The technology survey courses offer a broad overview of a number of areas of engineering andtechnology. The technology or topics or focus course is narrower in scope and develops onewell-defined area. The engineering design course, or technology creation course, places anemphasis on the engineering design process to develop technological solutions to problems. Thelast model to emerge is concerned with assessing technological impacts, connectingtechnological developments

Conference Session

Defining Technological Literacy

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn Neeley, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Technological Literacy Constituent Committee

name that gives so little insight into its character or potential—and thatcarries negative connotations and limitations that may undermine its chances for continuingsuccess. Although Technically Speaking and many other publications concerned withtechnological literacy reveal well-formed intentions and sophisticated reasoning, it appears thatthe name was selected with little deliberation or reflection on its implications. This paper willargue that we need to stop now to rename the enterprise and to reflect on the numerousconstituencies we will need to engage and system of heterogeneous elements we will need tobring together if we are to have an effective and productive interface between technical expertsand those without technical expertise

Conference Session

Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer L. Herman, Ohio State University; Ann D. Christy P.E., Ohio State University; Lynn Hall, Ohio State University; David A. Delaine, Ohio State University; William Cohen, Ohio State University; James Edward Toney, Ohio State University; Lisa Abrams, Ohio State University; Alan Kalish, Ohio State University; Melinda Rhodes-DiSalvo, Ohio State University; Toni M. Calbert, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

conversation withtheir supervisor or mentors to ensure that choices are made based on reflection about teachingpractice as well as timelines for submitting dossiers for promotion and tenure.We determined that incorporating meaningful, but intermittently administered summativeoptions as part of faculty annual reviews would ensure that the focus remained on teachingdevelopment, rather than strictly measured performance. To meet the needs of faculty whowould require summative evaluations for their promotion and tenure dossiers, our review optionson classroom teaching, syllabus and course materials include instructions and forms to helpobservers produce written reports documenting their observations that could be incorporated intoformal summative letters

Conference Session

TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Sara Kaye Jones; Mani Mina, Iowa State University of Science and Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

and aspects of tech- nological and engineering philosophy and literacy. In particular how such literacy and competency are reflected in curricular and student activities. His interests also include Design and Engineering, the human side of engineering, new ways of teaching engineering in particular Electromagnetism and other classes that are mathematically driven. His research and activities also include on avenues to connect Product Design and Engineering Education in a synergetic way. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021The challenge: The role of the student in Engineering and TechnologicalLiteracy programs, perspectives, discussions, and

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Micaela Sandoval, Texas A&M Health Science Center; Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University; Lauren Neala Holder, Texas A&M University; Mary Kathryn McDougal, Texas A&M University; Mary E Campbell, Texas A&M University; Bruce E. Herbert, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

deepermetacognitive skills through guided reflections. The University Libraries staff, as well as guestlecturers from public health and the humanities, are providing resources to bolster students’research and discovery skills, and the Writing Center on campus has pledged technicalcommunication and presentation support. Figure 3 serves as a visual display of the course andlearning objectives and elements. Each student group (typically four or five members) is alsoassigned a faculty mentor, who will facilitate relationships with partner agencies and provideinsight into the possible ramifications of proposed solutions. By committing their time andenergy to an outside organization, they will define their own knowledge gaps and opportunitiesfor advanced

Conference Session

Insights and Practices for Engineering Leadership Development

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Bayless, Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

used as the overarching tie in the leadership “S-triangle”pedagogy, which is illustrated in Figure 1. This approach links understanding of self, style, andsituation through hands-on application of leadership experience and discussions withPaper 18207 Page 2experienced leaders, as well as exploration of focused activities to help students reflect onleadership roles and characteristics.This work is the third evolution of an assessable “hands-on” capstone project for the semester-long leadership development course. The original effort was added to the curricula as a separateand late-in-class activity to reinforce learning through application. [5] This effort was

Conference Session

Engagement in Practice: Engaging the Community through Educational Outreach

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara Jordan-Bloch, Clayman Institute for Gender Research at Stanford University; Shoshanah Cohen, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

program and the Haas Centerfor Public Service to build both an educational program and research agenda that emphasize the value ofreciprocity, partnership, reflection, evaluation, and respect for diversity. In this paper, we present thelessons learned from our pilot year, including: the results from our feasibility evaluation, an assessment ofour partnership model, and our approach to scaling. Assessment of the students and their progress isongoing.Project Background and MotivationUnderrepresentation of women in computer science and engineering fields is a persistent phenomenon. Inthe US, while women earn 53% of undergraduate bachelor’s degrees overall, they represent only 18% ofcomputer science graduates [1], [2]. Underrepresented minority women