Paper ID #9266Sustainability in Undergraduate Civil and Mechanical Engineering Instruc-tionDr. Kenneth R. Leitch P.E., West Texas A&M University Dr. Leitch joined the West Texas A&M University School of Engineering and Computer Science in 2009. He received a BSCE with Honors in 1995, an MSCE in 1997, and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering in 2002, all from New Mexico State University. He also holds an MBA (2009) from Colorado Christian University. Dr. Leitch’s research interests include the structural and transportation subareas of civil engineering as well as engineering education, sustainability, ethics, and
, Technology, and Society (STS) programI. IntroductionIn many orientations to social science research, study participants are positioned as objects ofinquiry, but are not treated as partners in the inquiry process or within knowledge developmentprocesses. This paper offers one account of an engineering education research team disruptingthis dichotomy between “researcher” and “researched.”This work takes place in the context of an NSF-funded ethnographic investigation of Universityof Maryland (UMD) College Park Scholars Science, Technology, and Society Living LearningCommunity (STS-LLC) [1]. Our investigation focuses on understanding how engineeringstudents’ macro-ethical reasoning develops within the cultural practices of this community [2-5].In our
applicationexploration/storytelling.Conclusion: Through the use of examples, personal interactions, and application or classroomcontext-based anecdotes, faculty are already creating authentic microcosms of inclusiveclassrooms and are struggling to articulate how they do it to administrators and ABET. Wesuggest these resultant methods be used to create microinsertions of ethics and social impacts asone strategy for minimizing the technical/social dualism present in most curriculum [6], [7]which we hope will prove a rigorous strategy for the eventual full integration of sociotechnicalapproaches to problem solving in engineering education.IntroductionThere is a lack of consistency concerning integrating social impacts fully into technical lessons,modules, courses
2. an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 4. an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts 5. an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and
attributes cluster for a new engineer in engineering practice asperceived by key engineering stakeholders. The data consisted of perceived similarities between eachpossible pair of graduate attributes collected from engineering student, faculty and industrystakeholders. Multidimensional scaling analysis showed that the 12 graduate attributes can beconceptualized as four clusters, which we have suggested be titled, Problem Solving Skills,Interpersonal Skills, Ethical Reasoning, and Creativity and Innovation. These findings, supported bythe relevant literature, highlight the need to further explore how engineering competencies cluster inpractice to add empirical support for program changes aimed toward educating the whole engineer.1. Introduction and
Paper ID #15377The Role of Engineers as Policy Entrepreneurs toward Energy Transforma-tionsProf. Efrain O’Neill-Carrillo, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Efra´ın O’Neill-Carrillo is a professor of power engineering at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez (UPRM). He holds a Ph.D. (Arizona State), an M.S.E.E. (Purdue), and a B.S.E.E. (UPRM). His profes- sional interests include energy policy, sustainable energy, distributed generation, power quality, social and ethical implications of engineering, and technology. He has authored or co-authored more than 60 peer-reviewed journal and conference papers. O’Neill
students to realistically assess technological implications within the worldstage and to bridge the gap between the developed world and the developing worlds. The coursefalls into the inter-disciplinary STS classification (a field known as Science, Technology andSociety whose main focus is to explore the influences of technologies on society and therelationships between societies and technologies). The course emphasizes an integration of alltheir previous studies at DeVry in addition to professional group work, research, researchpresentations and technical reports, communication, critical thinking and analysis, solutions andapplications of the moral and ethical dilemmas the use of technology sometimes presents. Thecourse also identifies conditions
novel and interactive website. The website is available free of charge atwww.talk2mebook.com and contains the novel, several tie-in activities (currently ArtificialIntelligence, Design, and Ethics), and a blog. Each of these elements has been carefully plannedin relation to IE. The following sections highlight the use of IE in Talk to Me, and how specificcognitive tools are used to promote deep learning.Novel The core component of Talk to Me is a young-adult mystery story with a cast of five maincharacters. The protagonist is Sadina Reyes, a fourteen-year-old girl who is searchingdesperately for proof that her mother is innocent of a crime. Sadina’s younger sister Maddieknows who really committed the crime, but has a disorder called
from the American Society of CivilEngineers (ASCE) requires that curriculum include application of the “principles ofsustainability, risk, resilience, diversity, equity, and inclusion to civil engineering problems,”application of “an engineering code of ethics,” and application of “professional attitudes andresponsibilities of a civil engineer” [1]. The importance of these criteria is reflected directlywithin the preamble to ASCE’s Code of Ethics, which provides four fundamental principles forengineers to govern their professional careers, the first being to “create safe, resilient, andsustainable infrastructure” [2]. The importance of sustainability, both within civil engineeringeducation and the civil engineering profession, is well
Technology Studies (STS), cultural studies, innovation studies, communication, and the scholarship of teaching and leaDr. Shannon Conley Shannon N. Conley is an assistant professor in the Bachelors Program in Integrated Science and Tech- nology (ISAT) at James Madison University. She holds a PhD in Political Science from Arizona State University, and her research and teaching focus on sociaDr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, Col- lege Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology. David also does public engagement with science andDr. Nicole Farkas Mogul
). Bielefeldt is active in the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), serving on the Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee (2019-2022) and the Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee (2016-2018). She is the Senior Editor for the International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering (IJSLE) and a Deputy Editor for the ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. Her research focuses on engineering education, including ethics, social responsibility, sustainable engineering, and community engagement. Bielefeldt is also a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education.Laura MacDonald Managing Director, Mortenson Center in Global EngineeringCarlo Salvinelli Dr. Salvinelli is a Teaching Assistant
- gineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics. Dr. Barry is the 2020 recipient of ASEE’s National Outstanding Teaching Award.Major David Carlson P.E., United States Military Academy Major David Carlson is an instructor of Civil Engineering in the Department of Civil and Mechanical En- gineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He was commissioned as an Engineer Officer from the U.S
professor in the science, technology & society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. He is also the co-leader of the ’Nano and the City’ thematic research cluster for the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University. Rider is a Research Collaborator with the Sustainability Science Education program at the Biodesign Institute. His research focuses on wicked problems that arise at the intersection of society and technology. Rider holds a Ph.D. in
requirements currently in place. Therefore, it is beneficial to examine othermechanisms for incorporating biorefinery instruction, either as individual topics, components, orunits that can be used as specific learning modules, into existing coursework. Many approacheshave been found to be quite successful vis-à-vis augmenting engineering instruction by insertingadditional materials into mainstream instruction [62]. Addressing engineering ethics is a primeexample. Some avenues that have been shown to work well include integrating focusedcomponents (theory as well as case study analyses) into specific technical courses [63-67],examining issues during technical problem solving in specific technical courses [68], issues andtopics for review during
, including the ethics of science and technology, environmental science, technology and decision-making, and radiation, health, and policy. Her research has ranged over risk assessment and communication, green design, bioelectromagnetics, education in general, and pedagogy for modern-day literacy, such as scientific, environmental, and global literacy, and engineering ethics. Dr. Nair chaired the national Global Learning Leadership Council of the American Association of Col- leges & Universities (AAC&U) from 2010 to 2013 and is currently a member of the Global Advisory Committee. She is also on the advisory panel of the Center for Engineering, Ethics & Society (CEES) of the National Academy of Engineering
Teaching / Learning 4 Learning Styles Straw Towers Hiring and Firing Learning Process Process Industry Guest Ch 4: Making the Most 5 Ethics Ethics Tutoring Center Speaker of How You are Taught Ch 5: Making the Industry Guest 6 Name Practice Learning Process Work Names Success in Math Speaker for You Industry Guest
and withdrawal, and alternative methodological approaches to organizational and psychological science.Qin Zhu, Purdue University Qin Zhu is a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His main research interests include global, comparative, and international engineering education, engineering education pol- icy, and engineering ethics. He received his BS degree in materials science and engineering and first PhD degree in the philosophy of science and technology (engineering ethics) both from Dalian University of Technology, China.Ms. Kavitha D Ramane, Purdue UniversityNeha Choudhary, Purdue University Programs Neha choudhary is currently pursuing doctoral studies at Purdue university
this qualitativecase study was to better understand engineering students’ learning experiences in a EWB project,looking specifically at how students participating on the project exhibit attributes of globalengineering competencies. The case study investigates an EWB project with the mission ofdesigning and implementing a solar-powered electricity system for a school in Uganda. Wefound that students do exhibit attributes of global engineering competencies, although attributesregarding engineering cultures and ethics were exhibited more strongly than attributes regardingglobal regulations and standards. We discuss implications of these findings for educationalpractice and future research.IntroductionProviding engineering students opportunities
number and type of design criteria comprising the rubric. The completed rubric willprovide engineering educators and students with a learning and assessment tool to enhancesustainable design outcomes of projects.IntroductionDuring the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, a special session posed a question about howengineering educators can assess “difficult to measure” learning outcomes like sustainability,ethics, entrepreneurship, etc. Panelists presented numerous examples of assessment tools andmethods that could be used to benchmark and measure learning gains in each difficult area. Afollow-up systematic literature review focused on “sustainability assessments” in ASEEproceedings identified twenty-nine recent publications describing various tools and
, either as individual topics,components, or units that can be used as specific learning modules, into existing coursework.In fact, many approaches have been found to be quite successful for augmenting engineering andtechnology instruction by inserting additional materials into mainstream instruction38.Addressing engineering ethics is a prime example of how specific topics can be infused intocurricula without adding additional courses. Some avenues that have been shown to work wellinclude integrating focused components (theory as well as case study analyses) into specifictechnical courses39-43, examining issues during technical problem solving in specific technicalcourses44, issues and topics for review during capstone experiences45-46, specific
analytical and experimental studies that incorporate statistical, computer, and other appropriate techniques. (b), (e), (k), (m), (o)4. The ability to communicate effectively for presentation and persuasion using oral, written, and electronic media. (g), (p), (q)5. The ability to organize, lead, coordinate, and participate in industrial engineering and multi-disciplinary teams. (d), (l), (n)6. An appreciation of the humanities, social sciences, and contemporary issues for the general education of the individual and as resources for engineering studies and professional behavior. (h), (j)7. An appreciation of the ethical and professional responsibilities of Industrial Engineers and the benefits of a
mechanisms for incorporating biological and bioprocessing instruction, either asindividual topics, components, or units that can be used as specific learning modules, intoexisting coursework. Many approaches have been found to be quite successful vis-à-vis Page 11.1294.10augmenting engineering and technology instruction by inserting additional materials intomainstream instruction [58]. Addressing engineering ethics is a prime example. Some avenuesthat have been shown to work well include integrating focused components (theory as well ascase study analyses) into specific technical courses [59-63], examining issues during technicalproblem solving in
desired needs needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability 3(d) An ability to function on multi- An ability to function on multi- disciplinary teams disciplinary teams 3(e) An ability to identify, formulate, and An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems solve engineering
among 40students. Thematic analysis technique was used to identify what the students gained in thisassignment. After completing the assignment, many of them believed that they have chosenthe correct path and interviewing engineers had strengthened their determination to becomeengineers. They found out what engineers do, motivating them to have the desire to becomeexcellent engineers in the future. The engineers reminded them that in addition to technicalskills, it is also important to learn about sustainable development and engineering ethics aswell as other professional skills to be good engineers. Students also reflected that theassignment helped them develop communication, time management and team-working skills.Therefore, the simple
engineering and those defined for all students of the University by the Office ofInternational Affairs at Ohio State University. The eight are: 1. Understanding of global cultural diversities and their impact on engineering decisions. 2. Ability to deal with ethical issues arising from cultural or national differences. 3. Proficiency in a second language. 4. Ability to communicate across cultural and linguistic boundaries. 5. Proficiency in working in an ethnically and culturally diverse team. 6. Understanding of the connectedness of the world and the workings of the global economy. 7. Understanding of the international aspects of engineering topics such as supply chain
on Engineering and Society for First-Year Engineering Students and Non-MajorsAbstractA course designed for first-year engineering students and non-majors was conceived, piloted andtaught over the course of two semesters. The course addresses the engineering design process,including a hands-on project, engineering ethics, and engineering and society content. This paperdescribes the course and the instructors’ experience teaching it, and reports on an initial study ofchanges in student perceptions in the course using a single group, pre-test/post-test design.Background and IntroductionClarkson University is a small, technologically-focused, research university comprised of threeschools – Engineering, Arts and
English natively or extremely fluentlyconverged at KNU from higher-education institutions in Canada, the United States, France, andthe Netherlands to offer eight separate courses in computer science, business ethics, chemical Page 12.1165.3literature review, introduction to psychology, international marketing, meteorology, philosophy,and technical communication (“Practical English”).Practical English was based on a preexisting, junior-level technical writing course required of allengineering and computer science undergraduates at Mississippi State University, an Americanpartner university of KNU. Practical English was a three-hour course (like GE
Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team.Dr. Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter is an accredited green design professional (LEED AP) and practicing professional engineer (PE) whose expertise includes Low Impact Development (LID), innovative stormwater best management practices (BMPs), hydrologic and
conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data.b.1 Identify and describe experiment goals, related theoretical concepts and resources to be used.b.2 Execute a systematic and structured experiment with organized data.b.3 Analyze and critically interpret data using appropriate tools.b.4 Draw meaningful conclusions and produce a high quality technical report.Outcome c: An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs withinrealistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability.c.1 Define requirements specifications (scope) and constraints for the component or system to bedesignedc.2 Develop a feasible design to comply with
analyze and interpret data C) An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health, and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. D) An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. E) An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. F) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. G) An ability to communicate effectively. H) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context. I) A recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long learning. J) A knowledge of