Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division (IND) Technical Session 4

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering Division (IND)

literature on quality in engineering education, accreditationis the predominant theme [4]–[8]. Engineering has been a pioneer in a discipline-specificaccreditation process, which serves as a model for other professional disciplines [6].The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) implemented in 1997 anew set of accreditation standards (Engineering Criteria 2000, EC2000), after which alearning outcomes assessment protocol became central for quality assurance models inundergraduate engineering programs [9] [10] [11]. Different international accreditationagencies for engineering programs have since agreed to define comparable learning outcomesthat shape the current quality standards in the discipline [12][13]. The latter has impacted

Conference Session

LEES 6: Writing & Communication

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca Essig, Purdue University Fort Wayne

systematic project process of project planning and management 2. Utilize appropriate analytical and computer tools in project work 3. Communicate effectively using simple memos, properly formatted tables and properly formatted figures following an engineering format and style guideline 4. Identify and demonstrate the behaviors of an effective team member and prepare a project scheduleThis type of assignment is a traditional method of incorporating writing in a science,engineering, or technology course. As mentioned previously, one of the weekly class meetings ofENGR 101 is a project studio where students work in small groups to perform an experiment thatillustrates a concept learned in lecture. There are three primary

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 7

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen Moore, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Liesl Folks, The University of Arizona; Erin Rowley, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

rShiny works and how they can use it to engage with the data set. Basedupon this, we conclude that the communicative and technological skills required in the internshipaligned with our micro-credential goals.CONCLUSION AND LIMITATIONSThis program is in its infancy: we’ve only just now begun the second cohort, and the pandemicgreatly impacted our ability to secure students. Nonetheless, we think reporting out on thisproject is worthwhile for a number of reasons. First, data science is an increasingly importantpart of STEM education, but its locale within academic programs is inconsistent and notnecessarily within engineering programs’ footprints. We hope this program offers a blueprint forhow interdisciplinary and engineering programs might

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 3

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

titles of the degrees that they offer, which may have led to some of the differences thatwere found on the websites. Among ABET EAC accredited non-specialty programs, degreenames included general engineering, interdisciplinary engineering, multidisciplinary engineering,and engineering.Table 1. Examples of ABET EAC Accredited Program Name Changes [19]Institution Older Name Newer NameGrand Valley State University Engineering BS 1988-1989 Interdisciplinary Engineering 2011- Engineering BSE 1989 - 2011 presentMontana Technological Engineering Science BS 1981-1999 General Engineering BS 1999- University

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Giannina Costa, Universidad Andres Bello; Juan Felipe Calderón, Universidad Andres Bello; David Ruete, Universidad Andres Bello; Danilo Leal, Universidad Andres Bello; Lilian Pamela San Martín Medina, Universidad Andres Bello

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

´es Bello.Dr. Juan Felipe Calder´on, Universidad Andres Bello Juan Felipe Calder´on received the bachelor’s in computer science and MSc and PhD degrees in engineer- ing sciences from the Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile. He is an assistant professor in the Faculty of Engineering at the Universidad Andres Bello, Chile. His research and teaching is focused on software engineering, software design, distributed systems and computer-supported collaborative learning, and new strategies for computer science teaching.Dr. David Ruete, Universidad Andres Bello David Ruete has the academic training of: Doctor in Multimedia Technologies, Master in Multimedia Technologies, Electronic Civil Engineer and Bachelor of

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University; Zachary Michael Steudel; Joshua Craig Hunter, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

also retrieving very specific pieces of information from binary files,that are usually masked by all other compilers.Ghidra’s functionality does not stop at just the decompiled code. The list of different toolsavailable in Ghidra are extensive and all serve different purposes that are beyond the need in thispaper. However, there are some really interesting aspects of Ghidra that might help illuminatewhy Ghidra is at the forefront of reverse engineering technology. This includes the graphicflowchart, function call graph, and the wide range of instruction info.Ghidra in itself has almost all of the aspects of the other reverse engineering tools stored intoone. Also, with having the ability to install packages within the system, it is very likely

Conference Session

Microsoft Teams, Deep Learning, and Classroom Flipping

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Paul M. Kump, SUNY Maritime College

Tagged Divisions

Ocean and Marine

,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) classrooms, but with varying degrees of success[1]. Prior research has demonstrated that a wide range of students with varying abilities and skill levelscan benefit from the flipped classroom format, but the benefits are not uniformly distributed among thegeneral STEM student population. For example, studies [2, 3] have suggested that medical studentsrespond most favorably—reporting heightened enjoyment, decreased boredom and a large gain inknowledge and skills—because the students naturally enjoy collaborative and project-based learning inhands-on environments. In maritime engineering, these same qualities are shared by students who seekU.S. Coast Guard Licensure (“license students”), qualities which

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Daniel Knight, University of Colorado Boulder; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado Boulder; Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable struc- tures, products, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Alexa Tannebaum, Duke University; Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University; Rebecca Simmons, Duke University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #32950Women in Engineering: 3D Printing Interests, Habits, and PersistenceAlexa Tannebaum, Duke UniversityDr. Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University Sophia Santillan joined Duke as an assistant professor of the practice in summer 2017. As a STEM educa- tor, she is interested in the effect of emerging technology and research on student learning and classroom practice. After earning her bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degrees from Duke, Santillan taught at the United States Naval Academy as an assistant professor and at the high school level, where she taught across the four-year math curriculum, including

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lisa Abrams, Ohio State University; Adithya Jayakumar, Ohio State University; Lucille Sheppard, Ohio State University; Amy Kramer P.E., Ohio State University; Toni M. Calbert, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

structures. Her current research interests include engineering epistemology and engineering identity with the underlying goal of making engineering education more inclusive.Dr. Toni M. Calbert, Ohio State University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Empowering Engineering Students as Allies Through Dedicated Classroom InstructionAbstractWomen* and other minoritized groups experience an unwelcoming environment in highereducation [1-5]. This is particularly acute in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math(STEM) fields, where students have reported experiencing both explicit and subtle biasedbehaviors by faculty, administrators and fellow

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lelanie Smith, University of Pretoria; Nadia Millis Trent P.E., University of Waikato

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education

, requires more data and investigation to be performed. In particular, we areinterested in the student experience and the students' perception of ARENDs contribution to theirprofessional skill development and subject cross synthesis. Based on the above findings,administrators at engineering schools and colleges should consider expanding support for student- andstaff-driven co-curricular programming.References[1] K. Edström, and A. Kolmos, “PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering educationdevelopment,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol 39-5, pp. 539-555. 2014.[2] A. Kamp, “Science and Technology education for 21st century Europe,” CESAER. 2019.[3] N.M. Trent, and L. Smith, “How the AREND project cultivated innovative attitudes

Collection

Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE PSW Section Conference, canceled

Authors

Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego; Rachel Bristol, University of California San Diego; Leah Klement, UC San Diego; Paul Andreas Hadjipieris; Sheena Ghanbari Serslev, University of California San Diego ; Carolyn L Sandoval, University of California, San Diego

considerations of working as anengineer, and how critical thinking and social and emotional competencies are essential to solveproblems and generate technological innovations.2 Although it is well-recognized that such skillsare important in professional contexts, there is some evidence that traditional engineeringeducation does not effectively foster the growth of critical thinking skills and creativity inengineering students.3 Research in engineering education has focused considerable effort oninvestigating more effective teaching methods to target these skills.4 To contextualize the presentresearch, a review of literature on critical thinking is provided alongside a review of scholarshipexamining the effect that flipped classrooms and varied

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Gross, Kettering University; Diane L. Peters, Kettering University; Stacy Lynn Mann, Kettering University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #22341Synergies between Experience and Study in Graduate Engineering Educa-tionDr. Elizabeth Gross, Kettering University Elizabeth Gross is a doctoral fellow in Engineering Education at Kettering University in Flint, MI. She is also adjunct professor in learning design and technology at Wayne State University in Detroit, MI and in the Library Science department at Sam Houston State University in Huntsville, TX.Dr. Diane L. Peters, Kettering University Dr. Peters is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University.Ms. Stacy Lynn Mann, Kettering University Undergraduate Student in Mechanical

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susantha Herath, St. Cloud State University; Rohitha Goonatilake, Texas A&M International University ; Suvineetha Herath

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

summer internships by scholars, and built newstructures and strengthen relationships with other 2-year and 4-year colleges, industry andnational labs. Marketing materials emphasized the promise of computing in the real world,steady job growth expected for next ten years, and a comparison of lifetime earnings of workerswith STEM and other majors.1. IntroductionThe world needs high-quality, trained majors in Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics (STEM) with the ability to learn in a short period and stay current with advances intheir respective fields without accumulating massive debts to complete a degree. According tothe Bureau of Labor Statistics’ in the US [1], job opportunities due to growth and replacementsare high in the computing

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

institutions as a team processwith socio-technological dimensions. (13) One practical reason is that ABET general engineeringcriteria target the social aspects of engineering education at several levels. In addition to criterion3(c), “an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs,” criterion 3(d)addresses the need to function on multidisciplinary teams, criterion 3(f) social and ethicalresponsibilities, criterion 3(g) communication skills, and criterion 3(h) addresses global andsocial impact. Constructivist theories of learning, irrespective of the subject matter, recognizethat learning is a social activity, and design-based courses, including project-based courses, areregarded by most as opportunities to improve students

Conference Session

International Case Studies:Collaborations, Exchanges & Interactions

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raghu Echempati, Kettering University; Butsch Michael, FH-Konstanz, Germany

Tagged Divisions

International

Dominion University and Rajagiri College in Cochin, Page 12.1048.5India is discussed by Chaturvedi, et al11,12. Their overall program is assessed for itsbenefits, efficiency and students understanding of the US and Indian university systems.Thompson and Sterkenburg13 of Aviation Technology at Perdue University discussanother international program in terms of the true meaning of global engineering asapplied to their Aviation Technology program. At the ASEE 2002 Colloquium held inBerlin, Germany several papers on study abroad programs were presented. For example,refer to the paper by Rogers14, which outlines a program sponsored by Siemens

Conference Session

Faculty Attitudes and Perceptions

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Lord, University of San Diego; Michelle Camacho, University of San Diego; Christina Aneshansley, University of San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

on student feedback) Small group work in class Students help shape the syllabus Student presentations; allowing students to occasionally teach the class Use of multimedia (new technologies, films, music, Tablet PC excluding PowerPoint) Use of space; consideration of seating arrangement in class Page 13.213.7 Use of examples relevant to students, Example: popular culture Visit local industry; tour a facility4.2. Data Analysis: Cultural Consensus AnalysisTo determine if agreement exists among engineering educators, we ran a cultural consensusanalysis using Anthropac, a commercially-available statistical analysis program.29 Output fromthis

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Trevelyan, University of Western Australia; Sabbia Tilli, University of Western Australia

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

commenced in 2007 with 192 graduates from the 2006 graduating cohort. Wemanaged to recruit around 60% of the overall graduating cohort from the faculty including civil,electrical, electronic, environmental, information technology, materials, mechanical,mechatronics, oil and gas, petroleum, resources and mining systems engineers. From the pilotstudy we found that at least two class appearances are needed in person to recruit a significantpercentage of graduating students. One group, software engineering, had no formal classes inthe last few months of their course so we resorted to e-mail, but without success. Theparticipation rate for electrical and electronic engineers is also less than the other disciplines forsimilar reasons. We also appeared at

Conference Session

Outcomes of Cooperative Education Assignments

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Johrendt, University of Windsor; Schantal Hector, University of Windsor; Michelle Watters, AUTO21; Derek Northwood, University of Windsor; Geri Salinitri, University of Windsor; Arunita Jaekel, University of Windsor; Karen Benzinger, University of Windsor

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative & Experiential Education

portion of the student’s college or universitycareer and allowing the progression in complexity of both the academic studies and the workexperiences is fundamental to cooperative education6. Employer and student performanceevaluation data have traditionally been used to reflect on and improve student or employerperformance in an informal way. An emphasis has been placed on developing evaluation criteriathrough learning outcomes that meet the needs of the cooperative education programs and theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) or the Canadian EngineeringAccreditation Board (CEAB).Research on cooperative education and engineering students has shown a positive impact onearnings and grade point averages at the cost of extended

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rick Williams, East Carolina University; Stacy Klein-Gardner; Loren Limberis; Stephanie Sullivan, East Carolina University

background, broad knowledge in a range ofareas, and specific skills in problem solving to give them a sound but flexible base for managingand implementing technology change and operations.” In 2004, East Carolina Universityinitiated a bachelor’s degree program in general engineering (BSE) to fulfill this requirement.The BSE curriculum is implemented “through a concept and program identified as theIntegrated Collaborative Engineering Educational Environment (ICEE). The ICEE program…emphasizes a broad but highly integrated foundation of engineering fundamentals andengineering sciences necessary for a general engineer.”1 The ECU engineering program features a common core that develops the fundamentalengineering skills and four concentrations

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donna Riley, Smith College; Lionel Claris, Smith College; Nora Paul-Schultz, Smith College; Ida Ngambeki, Smith College

2006-258: LEARNING/ASSESSMENT: A TOOL FOR ASSESSING LIBERATIVEPEDAGOGIES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONDonna Riley, Smith College Donna Riley is Assistant Professor in the Picker Engineering Program at Smith College. Her work focuses on implementing liberative pedagogies in engineering education.Lionel Claris, Smith College Lionel Claris holds a master's degree in education from Smith College and currently teaches Spanish and French to elementary school students in Springfield, MA. He is a passionate advocate for new ways of thinking about learning, involved locally in the Holistic School Project of Amherst and the Re-radicalization of Hampshire College.Nora Paul-Schultz, Smith College Nora

Conference Session

Innovative Classroom Techniques

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd Johnson, Washington State University; Reid Miller, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

2006-483: MEASURING ENGINEERING CLASSROOM COMMUNITY:LEARNING AND CONNECTEDNESS OF STUDENTSTodd Johnson, Washington State University Dr. Johnson is Assistant Professor in Educational Psychology. His primary teaching activity includes theoretical foundations of learning and instruction, educational statistics, educational measurement,assessment of learning, and program evaluation. He served as Co-PI on an NSF ?Bridging Engineering Education? grant called the CyberMentor (Mathematics and Engineering via New Technologies: Outreach and Recruitment) project. A major part of this grant was to promote and develop partnerships and interdisciplinary initiatives connecting education, engineering, K-12

Conference Session

Life After Graduation

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela Harris, Stanford University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University; Katherine L. Reinders; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #19874Understanding Engineering Student Motivating Factors for Job Applicationand SelectionDr. Angela Harris, Stanford University Angela is currently a Fellow with the Thinking Matters program at Stanford University. Angela received her PhD in Stanford’s Environmental Engineering and Science Program (Spring 2015). Angela completed her B.S. in Chemical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology prior to coming to Stanford for her M.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Angela conducts research related to water, sanitation, and child health in developing countries. Angela has extensive experience

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 7: Learning and Research in Makerspaces

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louis Nadelson, University of Central Arkansas; Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University; Jana Bouwma-Gearhart, Oregon State University; Sarah Lanci, Colorado Mesa University; Kate Youmans, Utah State University; Cindy Ann Lenhart, Oregon State University; Alexis K. Van Winkle, University of Central Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, and engineering teach- ing to frame his research on STEM teaching and learning. Nadelson brings a unique perspective of research, bridging experience with practice and theory to explore a range of interests in STEM teaching and learning.Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best

Conference Session

Design Assessment

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kimberly Cook-Chennault, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

University Research Experience for Teachers in Engineering for GreenEnergy Technology and undergraduate scholars who participated in the REU Site: Green EnergyTechnology Undergraduate Program. The perceptions, understanding and evaluation of theprogram before the implementation of the multi-layered mentorship program are compared to themulti-layered program. High school students expressed higher confidence levels in theengineering design cycle and knowledge of the engineering discipline in the multi-layeredmentorship program. Undergraduate students who were in labs where they peer-mentoredteachers expressed higher levels of confidence in their skills as researchers than undergraduatestudents who did not peer-mentor in-service teachers or high school

Conference Session

Diversity and Inclusion: Concepts, Mental Models, and Interventions

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan Keogh, University of Colorado, Boulder; Malinda S. Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder; Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

curriculum development. She is passionate about hands-on engineering design for every student, at every age level.Dr. Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher and instructor in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second

Conference Session

Expanding Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Engineering Cultures from a Theoretical Perspective

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea Haverkamp, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

existing within a ‘black box’ – seeminglyuntouched and unengaged with feminist theories and social science research on gender that hasbeen developed since the 1980s [6]. She put forth that the binary language and framing of“Women in Science, Technology, and Engineering” efforts to be working against its intendedgoal: “While purporting to liberate girls and women from gender stereotypes and promoting their equality in SET, initiatives which mobilize ‘Women in SET’ discourse may actually be engaged in processes of regulation which reinforce those stereotypes and construct girls/women and SET in such a way as to make it difficult for girls and women to understand themselves as being capable SET students and future

Conference Session

Graduate Student Writing and Communication

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelly J. Cunningham, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

Paper ID #25266Graduate Engineering Peer Review Groups: Developing Communicators andCommunityKelly J. Cunningham, University of Virginia Kelly Cunningham is the director of the Graduate Writing Lab in the School of Engineering and Ap- plied Science at the University of Virginia. She holds a PhD in applied linguistics & technology and human-computer interaction (co-majors) from Iowa State University of Science & Technology and an MA in intercultural studies/TESOL. She has worked with ESL students since 2007 and in graduate com- munication support since 2014. Her research draws from qualitative methods, appraisal

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego; Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Catherine Mobley, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

(Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in eval- uation and research in engineering education, computer science education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an Ameri- can Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the American Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Exten- sion Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Cheryl Matherly; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Lisa Benson, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

country or group. It refers to one’s ability to make sound judgements based onglobal needs in which engineering and associated technologies can have impact on globalimprovement. Finally, Global Engineering Community Connectedness is the last subscale. Thissubscale refers to one’s awareness of humanity and appreciation of interrelatedness of all peopleand nations and the role that engineering can play in improving humanity, solving humanproblems via engineering technologies, and meeting human needs across national boundaries.Table 2: EGPI Sample Items by Selected Subscales/Constructs Subcale/Construct Sample Index Item Engineering Ethics Engineers in my country have a moral obligation to share their & Humanitarian engineering