relates to wearables and engineering. Based on participant feedback, a modifiedcurriculum is being written in hopes of more successfully meeting these goals in future versionsof the camp.Bibliography 1. Buechley, Leah, Kylie A. Peppler, Michael Eisenberg, and Yasmin B. Kafai. Textile Messages: Dispatches From the World of E-Textiles and Education. New York: Peter Lang, 2013. Print. 2. Buechley, Leah, Mike Eisenberg, Jaime Catchen, and Ali Crockett. 2008. “The LilyPad Arduino: Using Computational Textiles to Investigate Engagement, Aesthetics, and Diversity in Computer Science Education.” In SIGCHI: Proceeding of the Twenty-sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355–368.2. Johri, A. and Olds, B. M. (2011), Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences. Journal of Engineering Education, 100: 151–185. doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2011.tb00007.x3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. National Academy Press Washington, DC.4. Engle, R (2012). The productive disciplinary engagement framework: Origins, key concepts, and continuing developments. Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning. London: Taylor & Francis, 2012.5. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding
, "A Brief History of Biomedical Research Ethics in Iran: Conflict of Paradigms," Developing World Bioethics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 107-112, August 2015.21 B. Larijani and A. Rashidian, "Medical Ethics in Clinical Trial: A research on Research Dissertations in the form of Clinical Trial Conducted in Hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences," Scientific Journal of Medical Council of Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 65-73, 1999.22 A. M. Buyx and J. Tait, "Biofuels: Ethics and Policy-Makers," Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, vol. 5, no. 6, p. 631–639, November/December 2011.23 J. H. Hulse, "Biotechnologies, bioethics, biofuels, politics and poverty," Food Science & Technology, vol. 22, no
outside of their coursework. During their final year, engineering standardsare presented as standalone lecture in their senior capstone design course. Students prior orduring the same semester are presented with database and library resources for completingliterature reviews in a parallel course.The presentation of engineering standards is given just prior to project assignment. The timingof the instruction prior to the project assignments is because the first step after projectassignment is to complete a codes and standards worksheet (Appendix A) and realisticconstraints worksheet (Appendix B). After completing the worksheets the industry sponsors signoff on the scope of the project and standards utilized.Library instruction introduces students
Paper ID #13848Work-in-Progress: Leveraging Cloud Computing and Web Standards to Sup-port Learning Objectives in Multiple ClassroomsMs. Amber Shanice Solomon, Clemson UniversityDr. Sekou L Remy, Clemson University Sekou L. Remy is a researcher focused on removing barriers to effective use of Robotics and Cloud Computing in our homes, schools, and training centers. Dr. Remy is currently an Assistant Professor in Human-Centered Computing, and comes to Clemson from the University of Notre Dame where he was a Moreau Postdoctoral Fellow. He also had the pleasure of serving as a part-time instructor in Computer Science at Spelman
bache- lor degree in Physics Engineering from Tecnologico de Monterrey and a doctoral degree in Mathematics Education from Syracuse University, New York. Professor Dominguez is a member of the Researchers’ National System in Mexico (SNI) and currently she is the President of Red de Investigaci´on e Innovaci´on en Educaci´on del Noreste de M´exico (REDIIEN). Angeles has been a visiting researcher at Syracuse Uni- versity, at the University of Texas at Austin. She teaches undergraduate courses in Mathematics and grad- uate courses in Education. Professor Dominguez is a thesis advisor on the master and doctoral programs on education at the Tecnologico de Monterrey. Her main research areas are: a) models and modeling, b
and software engineering development managementprocess, which is a vast area, and does that in a fast-paced manner, leaving not much room forstudent experimentation with the techniques presented in class. Secondly, the topics covered aregeneric, as they apply for multiple engineering disciplines and the instructor needs to talk about“Activity A” and “Activity B” when presenting the modeling techniques rather than the “design Page 26.639.6the propulsion system” and “design the software control system.” Having said that, the instructordeveloped the course learning outcomes in such a manner to provide the students with thefoundations of the
climate. Following the initial coding, the threeresearchers met to define preliminary hypotheses based on the results. Considering both researchquestions, the researchers drafted 10 initial hypotheses that were used as a starting point for theremainder of the data analysis.The next phase in analytic induction is to examine a new case25, for this study that aligned with anew interview, final report, or qualitative survey response. The aim of this examination is todetermine whether the hypotheses adequately describe the new case. If a hypothesis does nothold, the hypothesis is either (a) modified to capture the new case and all previous cases moreaccurately or (b) given bounds such that this new case is excluded from the hypothesis25. The
Design (CAD) of Recursive/Non-Recursive FiltersA b s t r a c t. Computer Tools are integral part of many engineering design courses, they shouldbe used in the right place, right time. Courses in the Digital Signal Processing/Filter areas(including speech, image and video processing) have been traditionally viewed by students to befairly mathematical subjects including many abstractions (e.g., spectrum, analysis/designmethods in time/frequency domains, SNR, bandwidth, white/pink noise, various transforms, etc.)The pedagogical value of this work is that, with the help of modern engineering tools,engineering educators can better help students visualize these apparently difficult (but important)concepts. We focus on the subject of designing digital
must demonstrate the ability to accomplish theintegration of systems using appropriate analytical, computational, and application practices andprocedures… must demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge of probability, statistics,engineering economic analysis and cost control, and other technical sciences and specialtiesnecessary in the field of industrial engineering technology3”. According to ABET,manufacturing deals with value-added transformations in shape, form or properties of materials4.The specific ABET ETAC student outcomes for Engineering Technology are4: a. An ability to select and apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of the discipline to broadly-defined engineering technology activities b. An ability
, Edvardsson B. New service development: learning from and with customers. Int J Serv Ind Manag. 2004;15(5):479–498. doi:10.1108/09564230410564948.16. Kujala S. User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behav Inf Technol. 2003;22(1):1 – 16. doi:10.1080/0144929021000055530.17. Oehlberg L, Leighton IAN, Agogino A. Teaching Human-Centered Design Innovation across Engineering , Humanities and Social Sciences. Int J Eng Educ. 2012;28(2):484–491.18. Klatsky GJ. User centered design of human factors class projects. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 1998;42(7):611–615. doi:10.1177/154193129804200703.19. Sugar WA. What is so good about user-centered design? Documenting the effect of usability sessions on
Paper ID #12572Engineering, Society and the Environment in the Teaching Goals and Prac-tices of Engineering InstructorsMs. Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as Senior Lecturer, Curriculum, Teaching and Learning with the Division of Engi- neering Science at the University of Toronto. In this position, Lisa plays a central role in the evaluation, design and delivery of a dynamic and complex curriculum, while facilitating the development and imple- mentation of various teaching and learning initiatives. Lisa is cross-appointed with the Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning at OISE/UT, and
the systems approach,the educators are exposing their students to the various perspectives related to the utilization ofnatural resources for bio-energy, ways to mitigate the global climate change, and understand thecomplexities that are involved in modern scientific and technological challenges. The studentsare also exposed to career choices in the cutting-edge STEAM disciplines; b)To develop andprovide curricular materials and set of teaching tools for educators for enhancing instruction inthe areas of sustainable bio-energy and sustainability in their classrooms--In addition to trainingthe STEAM educators on a systems perspective of renewable energy, the program includesdeveloping and providing curricular materials and laboratory tool kits
and CCMSalignment project.References1. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: David McKay Company.2. Akins, L. & Burghardt, D. (2006) Work in Progress: Improving K-12 Mathematics Understanding with Engineering Design Projects. 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, M3C-14, October 28-31, 2006, San Diego, CA. Accessed 1/16/2015. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=41168693. Bottoms, G. & Anthony, K. (2005) Project Lead the Way: A Pre-Engineering Curriculum That Works: A New Design for High School Career
intendedobjective is to increase the support of, and participation in, the “BRIDGE” program at GeorgiaSouthern University. Another measure taken will be to encourage faculty to participate in communityactivities involving underrepresented groups. Additionally, the department plans to provide a nurturingenvironment for incoming freshmen through retention initiatives like the ‘Living LearningCommunity’. Progress will be measured by tracking enrollment, retention and diversity statistics, andidentifying the most prevalent recruitment avenues through the administration of a freshman survey. Page 26.268.4GOAL B: Prepare female students to function as high
portions: Part A investigating scientificliteracy and Part B investigating student value of the inquiry-guided pedagogy. Both parts wereassessed for validity using factor analysis and reliability using Cronbach’s alpha. Data wereanalyzed with Mann-Whitney U tests for non-parametric statistics.The SLIGS had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha >0.8). All statements factoredas anticipated with three exceptions. These exceptions will be revised and re-piloted. Thescientific literacy portion showed high levels of confidence both pre- and post-intervention (76%and 91% respectively, npre = 155 and npost=165). Further, there was a statistically significantincrease in confidence in all ten categories including explanation of scientific
., and Johnson, R.T., “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 94, Issue 1, pages 87-101, 20056. Tsang, E. Van Haneghan, J., Johnson, B., Newman, E.J., and Van Eck, S., “A Report on Service-Learning and Engineering Design: Service Learning’s Effect on Students Learning Engineering Design in ‘Introduction to Mechanical Engineering,’” International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(1), pages 30-39, 2001.7. Lamancusa, J.S., Jorgensen, J.E., Zayas-Castro, J.L., “The Learning Factory—A New Approach to Integrating Page 26.138.16 Design and Manufacturing into
downloaded datasets compiled from Survey Monkey were further analyzed to address theevaluation questions in the current report using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences(SPSS) version 21.Sources of criterion references used in the current evaluation are from (a) project expectationsand objectives cited in the proposal to NASA dated 2010; (b) two science teaching status reportsavailable online. These latter reports--“The Status of Secondary Earth Science Teaching” dated2002 but based on data from the 2000 National Survey conducted by Horizon Research for theNational Science Foundation (NSF) 8 and reports published by the Texas Education Agency(TEA) in May 2012 9 describing demographics and teaching experience of science teachersStatewide
still students (53% of responses) andthose who already graduated (47% of responses). Figure 3b illustrates that the participants aredistributed in wide-range of industries from aerospace to research and development. That is, theskills attained from the new course redesign can be assessed from academic and industrialperspectives. Page 26.1102.7 6 Figure 3: Percentage of (a) student and graduates; and (b) industry sector.Table 1 shows the survey questions, where each participant were asked to rate (on the scale 1 to5, where 1 represented “not well” and 5 indicated “extremely well”) the
Paper ID #12651The Management Tree of Life - An Aid for Undergraduate Engineers toStructure Management ThinkingDr. William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University Dr. William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering – Engineering Management from the University of Alabama in Huntsville and M.S. and B.S. degrees in Industrial and Management Engineering (IME) from Montana State University (MSU). He is an Assistant Professor in IME at MSU with research interests in engineering education and the role of leadership and culture in process im- provement. Prior to his academic career, he spent 14 years in
Francisco, CA.9. Banta, T. 2007. Assessing Student Learning in the Disciplines. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, CA.10. Banta, T. 2004. Hallmarks of Effective Outcomes Assessment. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, CA.11. Maki, P. L. 2004. Assessment for Learning. Building a Sustainable Commitment Across the Institution. Stylus Publishing. Sterling, VA.12. Maki, P. L. 2002. Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 28(1): 8–13.13. Walvoord, B. E. 2004. Assessment Clear and Simple: A Practical Guide for Institutions, Departments, and General Education. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, CA.14. The Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 2012. 21st Century Skills Framework. Available
(Co-PI), Gavrin(Co-PI), Marrs (Co-PI),Mzumara(Co-PI), “Central Indiana STEM Talent Expansion Program”, January, 2011 3. Dewey, John. 1938/1963. Experience & Education, Collier Books, New York.. 4. Kolb, David. 1984. Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 5. Kayes, A. B., Kayes, D. C., & Kolb, D. A. 2005. Experiential learning in teams. Simulation & Gaming, 36(3), 330-354. 6. IUPUI ET Students, “SiPP Student Essay”, July, 2012, July 2013, July 2014 Page 26.1441.8
Paper ID #11232Systems Engineering Approach in Aircraft Design Education; Techniquesand ChallengesProf. Mohammad Sadraey, Daniel Webster College Mohammad H. Sadraey is an Associate Professor in the Engineering School at the Daniel Webster Col- lege, Nashua, New Hampshire, USA. Dr. Sadraey’s main research interests are in aircraft design tech- niques, and design and automatic control of unmanned aircraft. He received his MSc. in Aerospace Engineering in 1995 from RMIT, Melbourne, Australia, and his Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Kansas, Kansas, USA. Dr. Sadraey is a senior member of the American
Society for Engineering Education 97 Table 2: ABET (2011) student outcomes and student chapter activities ABET (2011) Student Outcomes Examples of student chapter activities supporting the outcome (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process Participation in community work and competitions. to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such
initiatives, and PhD Completion in Panama, Mexico, Ecuador, Colombia, Puerto Rico, and schools across the United States. Tull is on the board of advisors for the PNW-COSMOS Alliance to increase the number of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) students who complete STEM graduate programs, and is a speaker on ”GRADLab” tour with the National GEM Consortium, giving talks across the US each Saturday morning during the Fall. Tull researched speech technology as former member of the faculty at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She has co-authored several publications on achievement in STEM fields, and is a mentoring consultant for Purdue, Carnegie Mellon, Cornell, and MIT. She co-leads the ”ADVANCE His- panic Women in
. College composition and communication, 122-128 (1977).15 Emig, J. Writing as a Mode of Learning. Landmark Essays on Writing Across the Curriculum, 89-96 (1994).16 Galbraith, D. Writing about what we know: Generating ideas in writing. Sage handbook of writing development, 48-64 (2009).17 Oatley, K. & Djikic, M. Writing as thinking. Review of General Psychology 12, 9 (2008).18 Ong, W. J. Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. (Routledge, 2012).19 Klein, P. D. & Yu, A. Best practices in writing to learn. Best practices in writing to learn (2nd ed.), The Guilford Press, New York, 166-189 (2013).20 Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M. & Wilkinson, B. The Effects of School-Based
Annual ASEE K-12 Workshop on Engineering Education “Authentic Engineering: Representing & Emphasizing the E in STEM” Presented by Dassault Systems Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:00 A.M. – 5:00 P.M. Sheraton Seattle | Seattle | WAWorkshop Description. Please provide a detailed description of the proposed workshop that, atminimum, explicitly addresses the following (maximum 4,000 characters): a. Learning objectives b. Hands-on activities and interactive exercises c. Materials that participants can take with them d. Practical application for teachers and outreach
examination from the section administered with miniproject and section without project were also compared. The result of the in-class surveypresented a strong positive response while the final examination score between the projectimplemented and non-implemented sections did not show significant differences. A longer trialperiod and more data collection are expected in the near future to investigate the efficacy of the“virtual” hands-on experience in dynamics via Virtual mechanical Laboratory. Also as a finalpoint, the mechanics of material module is under construction and to be tested in fall 2015. Page 26.536.139. References 1. Coller, B. D., “An
direct-pathway and returning engineering graduate students. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.11. Mosyjowski, E. A., Daly, S.R., Peters D.L., Skerlos, S.J., & Baker, A. B. (2014). The PhD advising relationship: Needs of returning and direct-pathway students. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. Page 26.859.7
of questions in the study related to engineers’ leadership, teaching, and mentoringskills before starting their engagement in this program and again directly after their involvementin the family science event (see Tables 2a and b). Data from the pre- and post-surveycomparisons are described here. While, in general engineers had pretty optimistic and positiveimpressions about how their skills would relate to design challenges with elementary schoolchildren and their families, a number of items stand out as being enhanced by the participation inthe program. For instance, most engineers agreed that at the outset they were fairly effective atteaching difficult concepts to non-technical people (58%). However after their experience in thefamily