device was developed earlier by another student as independent studyresearch. A comparison between mathematical modeling and experimental data will enablestudents to explore deviation of theoretical models from the physical system as also how well anassumption may describe a real system behavior.ConclusionsThe SLOs related to the course implementation of the learning modules are related to the twomain areas: (1) introductory notions for thermodynamics and fluid mechanics and (2) energyconversion and energy efficiency, from estimation to direct quantification. Therefore ABETcriteria and b will guide our SLO assessment as main criteria [7]. Also, criterion c will beimportant to assess, due to experimental nature of the activities developed. The
Paper ID #22246Examining the Relationships Between How Students Construct Stakeholdersand the Ways Students Conceptualize Harm from Engineering DesignAlexis Papak, University of Maryland, College Park Alexis Papak is a Research Assistant at the University of Maryland, College Park with the Physics Edu- cation Research Group. They completed their Bachelor’s Degree in Engineering Physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. Their research interests lie at the intersection of ethnic studies, critical pedagogies, and STEM teaching and learning.Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta
exemplars of macroethics instruction which have the potential be scaled andsustained at locations beyond their existing level of use. To assist in this process, four evaluationcriteria were established: (a) likely to have a high impact on student learning; (b) strongassessment methods; (c) novel or innovative; (d) transferability (to other institutions ordisciplines); these were rated on a scale from 1 (low) to 4 (high). An overall evaluation on levelof interest / excitement for including this teaching example in further research employed a 1(low) to 10 (highest) scale. Raters could also provide open comments. The interviewees wereasked to rate at least six de-identified teaching examples, and 29 sets of ratings were completed.The five members of
. Hutchinson, D. Henry, D. Verma, M. Clifford, and A. Pyster, Atlas: The Theory ofEffective Systems Engineers, version 1.0, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA,December 16, 2016.[5] R. K. Garrett, Jr., S. Anderson, N. T. Baron, and J. D. Moreland, Jr., “Managing theInsterstitials, a System of Systems Framework Suited for the Ballistic Missile Defense System”,Systems Engineering Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 87-109, J. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011.[6] R. Deiotte, and R. K. Garrett, Jr., A Novel Approach to Mission-Level Engineering ofComplex Systems of Systems; Addressing Integration and Interoperability Shortfalls byInterrogating the Intersititials, Missile Defense Agency, 13-MDA-7269, 29 April 2013.[7] J. Marvin, T. Whalen, B. Morantz, R
, no. 3, pp. 28–33, 1996.[13] K. L. McNeill and M. H. Vaughn, “Urban High School Students’ Critical Science Agency: Conceptual Understandings and Environmental Actions Around Climate Change,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 373–399, Dec. 2010.[14] D. P. Shepardson, D. Niyogi, S. Choi, and U. Charusombat, “Students’ conceptions about the greenhouse effect, global warming, and climate change,” Clim. Change, vol. 104, no. 3– 4, pp. 481–507, Jan. 2010.[15] B. Andersson and A. Wallin, “Students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect, the societal consequences of reducing CO2 emissions and the problem of ozone layer depletion,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1096–1111, Dec. 2000.[16] E. Boyes and M
associated events, a large number of Hungarian government-sponsored refurbishment projects were ongoing in the city. These projects provided a uniqueopportunity for Metropolitan State University of Denver (MSU Denver) and University of Pecs(UP) to jointly organize a Refurbishment of Structures course that constituted the start of anacademic collaboration between the two institutions. Although initially the partnership wasbetween the engineering colleges, by now it has expanded university wide. As the partnershipgrows, more academic areas, from Political Science, to Africana Studies, to Management havestarted collaborations, which consist mainly of faculty and student exchanges and jointconferences and program development. One of the main purposes of
school teachers enact when implementing an engineering design task? (b) How dowe capture and map teachers’ strategies over the course a design task? and (c) To what extent dothe observed high leverage practices coincide with the nature of the design task?Theoretical frameworkThis study draws upon the literature on ambitious teaching. The idea of ambitious teaching hasbeen developed by researchers in multiple subject matter areas including science, mathematics,and secondary literacy [2], [6], [7]. Ambitious teaching involves structuring opportunities forlearners to reason about key subject matter ideas, participate in the discourse of the discipline,and solve authentic problems [8]. In the science classroom, this means that students learn how
Comparison of Underrepresented Students in the Same Institution[3] American Society of Engineering Educators, "Engineering Degrees, 2017-2016," 16Profile-Front-Section(3).pdf, Ed., ed, 2017.[4] ABET. (2016). Setting the Standard World Wide. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/[5] C. R. Farrell and B. A. Lee, "No-majority communities: Racial diversity and change at the local level," Urban Affairs Review, p. 1078087416682320, 2017.[6] ABET. (2013). Engineering vs. Engineering Technology. Available: http://www.abet.org/engineering-vs-engineering-technology/[7] A. M. Lucietto, "The Role of Academic Ability in Choice of Major and Persistence in STEM Fields," Ph.D., College of Engineering School of
, E., Kireeva N., Stroganov I., Student’s projects as support of small busi- ness., Russian Entrepreneurship. 2017. T. 18. No. 3. P. 399-404.5.[5] Kelley, T, Kelley. D Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All[6] Welz, B., Rosenberg, A. (2018): SAP Next-Gen. Springer, 2018[7] Denning, P., Design Thinking, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 56 No. 12, Pages 29- 31[8] Kupp, M., Anderson, J., Reckhenrich, J., Why Design Thinking in Business Needs a Re- think., MIT Sloan Management Review; Cambridge Vol. 59, Iss. 1, (Fall 2017): 42-44.[9] Design Observatory at the Center for Design Research. Available: http://www-cdr.stan- ford.edu/observatory/ [Accessed: 18- March- 2018].[10] Anikushina, V., Taratukhin, V
Glassco, Jonathan Kass, Melissa Schwarz, Daniel L. Schwartz, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2012. “Parallel Prototyping Leads to Better Design Results, More Divergence, and Increased Self-efficacy.” In Plattner, Hasso, Christoph Meinel, and Larry Leifer (eds), Design Thinking Research: Studying Co-Creation in Practice. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg.[6] Zoltowski, Carla. B., William. C. Oakes, and Monica. E. Cardella. 2012. “Students’ Ways of Experiencing Human-Centered Design.” Journal of Engineering Education, 101:28–59. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00040.x[7] Nieusma, Dean. 2008. “Integrating Technical, Social, and Aesthetic Analysis in the Product Design Studio: A Case Study and Model for a New Liberal Education for
and R. B. Anderson, “The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 444–452, 1992.[7] M. Yeari, M. Oudega, and P. van den Broek, “The effect of highlighting on processing and memory of central and peripheral text information: evidence from eye movements,” J. Res. Read., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 365–383, Nov. 2017.[8] J. M. Burling and H. Yoshida, “Highlighting in early childhood: Learning biases through attentional shifting.,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 41 Suppl 1, no. Suppl 1, pp. 96–119, Feb. 2017.[9] A. Poole and L. J. Ball, “Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Current Status and
, 2008. 134(3): p. 279-286.13. Russell, J.S. and B. Stouffer, Leadership: Is it time for an educational change? Leadership and Management in Engineering, 2003. 3(1): p. 2-3.14. Carrato, P. and R. Haryott, Building leaders of a global society. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2003. 129(3): p. 125-128.15. Bonasso, S.G., Engineering, leadership, and integral philosophy. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2001. 127(1): p. 17-25.16. Cooney, T.J., Conceptualizing teachers’ ways of knowing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1999. 38(1/3): p. 163-187.17. McKay, V.C. and P.D. Rozee, Characteristics of faculty who adopt community service learning
, B. M. Dawant, J. M. Fitzpatrick, and R. F. Labadie, “Percutaneous cochlear implant drilling via customized frames: an in vitro study,” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 142, no. 3, pp.421-426, 2010.3 A. D. Pant, L. Kagemann, J. S. Schuman, I. A. Sigal, R. Amini, “An imaged-based inverse finite element method to determine in-vivo mechanical properties of the human trabecular meshwork,” Journal for Modeling in Ophthalmology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 100-111, 2017.4 R. Amini, S. Jouzdani, and V. H. Barocas, “Increased iris–lens contact following spontaneous blinking: Mathematical modeling,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 45 no. 13, pp.2293-2296, 2012.5 I. A. Sigal, J. G. Flanagan, and C. R
particular. It is a follow up to previous work by the author,on viable strategies to improve the classroom environment of engineering colleges in theArab Gulf Region. At the start, the paper provides an overview of relevant benchmarks ofengineering education in the Region. Then, relates author’s preliminary findings onteaching/learning practices in engineering colleges of the Region, sheds light on the pros andcons of the lecture format, and examines the literature on meanings and substance ofdifferent active learning protocols, focusing on cooperative engagement strategies. Thepaper, also, sheds light on: theoretical roots, research support, current practices, andsuggestions for redesigning classes, if need be, to stimulate interaction and help
2018 ETLI Capitol Hill Advocacy Day Miriam Quintal and Bill Ruch ASEE Government Relations Lewis-Burke Associates LLCLewis-Burke and ASEE• Started October 2, 2017• Goals: – Ramp up ASEE advocacy and presence in Washington – Protect engineering and engineering technology education and research funding – Promote sound policies for research and education – Make sure the engineering technology and engineering communities has a voice in relevant policy discussions – Develop grassroots efforts to engage members – THAT MEANS YOU!• Lewis-Burke: – Started in 1992 – 28 policy experts – 40 clients exclusively composed of non-profit entities: universities, scientific societies, managers of large federal
). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://w2.weather.gov/climate/ Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018, American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 506 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). National Hurricane Center (NHC). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). National Data Buoy Center (NDBC). (n.d.). Center or Excellence in Marine Technology. Retrieved from http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/ Othmar, H. A., Kármán, T. V. & Woodruff, G. B. (1941). The FWA
towards this question,indicating that the creative problem solving strategies may help their learning and facilitatethem to find right solutions to homework or exams. Based on students’ response to Question 1, i.e., “what benefits you get from your project”(see Table 1A and Table 1B in Appendix), the average of accounts by both ResearchAssistant A and Research Assistant B indicate that about 14% of the participants believedthat the community service learning with creative problem solving scaffolding can lead tobetter academic performance in their subsequent studies, such as “Helps me build work forthe next semester” (Interviewee 2, 2015 Fall), “learn to study in a better way, be moreaccurate.” (Interviewee 4, 2016 Fall), “Help studies…help
uncertain environment.The students’ efforts have three lasting impacts on the campus planning process. First, theproposed smart parking plan and related details from students research has been forwarded tocampus transportation and parking staff to inform their efforts to implement such a system.Secondly, the student efforts to update the five-year old campus GHG inventory has resulted inthe campus investing in staff time and latest on-line Cool Planet calculator license that has builtin benchmarking and strategy evaluation tools. Lastly, ongoing campus planning efforts aregoing to add a resilience component.References:1. Lantz, H. B. (2009). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education What Form? What Function? pp. 12. C40
ChE lifelong learning NEW MODEL FRAMEWORKS FORUNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRIAL PARTNERSHIPSSteven T. Perria,b, M. Barclay Satterfielda, Leah D. Burtonca Eastman Innovation Center • Raleigh, NC 27605b Current address: Eastman Chemical Company • Kingsport, TN 37662Oc NC State University • Raleigh, NC 27695-7005 pportunities for universities and businesses to col- They can provide access to talent to address current needs laborate are changing rapidly in response to shifts in as well as access to talent for future hiring. Some additional the global economy. In the United States, investors motivations and benefits are listed in Table 1.expect businesses to accelerate their growth and to delivergreater return
Paper ID #21046Optimizing Students’ Learning Experiences in Instrumentation and Mea-surement LaboratoryDr. Emine Celik Foust, York College of Pennsylvania Emine Celik Foust is currently an Associate Professor at York College of Pennsylvania. In 2008, she worked as a Postdoctoral Research Associate in Mechanical Engineering Department at Johns Hopkins University. She received her Master of Science and Ph.D degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Lehigh University. Emine Celik Foust’s research interests include design and development of engineering systems using ana- lytical and experimental approaches (advanced global
of TechnologyProf. Edward J. Coyle, Georgia Institute of Technology Edward J. Coyle is the John B. Peatman Distinguished Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing, directs the Arbutus Center for the Integration of Research and Education, and is the founder of the Vertically-Integrated Projects (VIP) Program. He is a Georgia Research Alliance Eminent Scholar and was a co-recipient of both the National Academy of Engineering’s 2005 Bernard M. Gordon Award for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education and ASEE’s 1997 Chester F. Carlson Award. Dr. Coyle is a Fellow of the IEEE and his research interests include engineering education, wireless networks, and digital signal processing
between art and engineering.References[1] H. Hahn, “The political implications of disability definitions and data”, Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 4(2), 1993, pp 42-55.[2] R. B. Darling, “Toward a model of changing disability identities: A proposed typology and research agenda”, Disability and Society, 18(7), 2003, pp. 881-895.[3] C. Y. Mason, M. S. Thormann, and K. M. Steedly, “How students with disabilities learn in and through the arts: An investigation of educator perceptions”, Washington, DC: VSA Arts, 2004.[4] M. Taylor, “Self-identity and the arts—Education of disabled young people”, Disability & Society, 20(7), 2005, pp. 763-778.[5] A. Smith, Reflections on Mouthstick Project, Figure Painting
., Backer, P. R., 2013, “How Important is the WOW Factor in First Year Engineering Courses?” AC2013-6417, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.[5] Eris, O., Chachra, D., Chen, H. L., Sheppard, S., Ludlow, L., Rosca, C., Bailey, T., Toye, G., 2010, “Outcomes of a longitudinal administration of the persistence in engineering survey,” Journal of Engineering Education, 99, pp. 371-395.[6] Mena, I. B., Zappe, S. E., Litzinger, T. A., 2013, “Examining the Experiences and Perceptions of First-Year Engineering Students,” AC2013-6270, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.[7] National Academy of Engineering, 2005, “The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in
. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 67, May 2013.[18] D. Duncan, “Professional Development Through Engineering Academies: An Examination of Elementary Teachers’ Recognition and Understanding of Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 520–539, 2011.[19] S. S. Guzey, K. Tank, H.-H. Wang, G. Roehrig, and T. Moore, “A High-Quality Professional Development for Teachers of Grades 3-6 for Implementing Engineering into Classrooms,” Sch. Sci. Math., vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 139–149, Mar. 2014.[20] M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre and B. Crujeiras, “Epistemic Practices and Scientific Practices in Science Education,” in Science Education, Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2017, pp. 69– 80.[21] J. D. Hertel, C. M. Cunningham, and G. J. Kelly
). Student interest in engineering is on decline. Daily Journal ofCommerce, Retrieved May 26, 2009 from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4184/is_20030611/ai_n1004581/[2] Mohr‐Schroeder, MJ, C Jackson, M Miller, B Walcott, DL Little, L Speler, (2014)Developing middle school students' interests in STEM via summer learning experiences: SeeBlue STEM camp. School Science and Mathematics 114 (6), 291-301[3] Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.[4] Brown, S.D. & Lent, R.W. (2006). Preparing adolescents to make career decisions: A socialcognitive perspective. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp.201-224). Greenwich, CT
prematurely. Of course, it is important topoint out that fortunately students who express interest in engineering have a good understandingabout dependence of engineering on mathematics and science. They also realize that the field ofengineering in academia and professional environment tends to be more rigorous than someother professions and requires high level of ethics and responsibility.Description of methodAfter many years of teaching this course, it has been realized that the purpose of offering anintroductory course in engineering could be threefold: a. To attract good students, especially minorities and females, to the field of engineering. b. To provide useful information about engineering for those who have undeclared majors and are
, London, 3-5 December 1985, Oxford: Learned Information (Europe) Ltd., 1985. pp. 163-169.[6] B. Murphy, “CD-ROM and Libraries,” Library Hi Tech, vol. 3 no. 2, pp. 21-26, 1985.[7] B.J.S. Williams, “CD-ROM: a New Medium for Publishing,” Information Media & Technology, vol. 19 no.3, pp.107-109, 1986.[8] S. Peniston, “Market Potential of CD ROM for Text Applications,” Journal of Information Science, vol. 15, pp. 21-26, 1989.[9] T. Hanson and J. Day Ed., CD-ROM in Libraries: Management Issues. London: Bowker- Saur, 1994.[10] J. Cox, “The CD-ROM Market,” in CD-ROM in Libraries: Management Issues, T. Hanson and J. Day, Ed. London: Bowker-Saur, 1994, p.19.[11] S. Mantell, “Looking it Up Is Looking Up: Improved Graphics and Increased
on theengineering profession in the years to come. Engineering faculty in the Arab GulfRegion, and the young in particular, need to expand their technical knowledge anddevelop new competencies to further their technical professional development andkeep up with modern approaches to teaching and learning. This paper explores waysto effective professional development of Region’s engineering educators to enablethem to assume the roles they are entrusted with. The purpose here is to offer a newway to think about the development of the professional engineering educator. In thisrespect, the paper focuses on:(i) the cognitive processes that faculty would follow asthey grow and learn more about teaching and learning,(ii) the discipline
Session ETD 425 Excel Spreadsheet in Mechanical Engineering Technology Education Prof. Ti Lin, Liu Department of Manufacturing & Mechanical Engineering Technology Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623 ASEE Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration (CIEC) 2018 Feb 7 – 9, 2018, San Antonio, TXAbstract:In the last three decades Excel Spreadsheet has become a very popular and effective computationaltool for performing engineering calculations. It is a great challenge on educators to apply this tooltowards
were identified using qualitative data analysis. They were broadly organized for this paperinto dominant themes that included a) interviewees’ characterizations of “the public,” b)experiences that shaped interviewees’ views of “the public,” c) interviewees’ understandingsabout their role in society, d) interviewees’ understandings about the role of “the public” inengineering decision making, and e) interviewees’ perceptions of risks and benefits associatedwith interacting with “the public.”IntroductionAt the forefront of the engineering code of ethics is the mandate to “hold paramount the safety,health and welfare of the public”1. The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) refers toengineers as “a key force in the improvement of our economic